012임수진

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "012임수진"

상연 모
4 years ago
Views:

1 Received : Reviewed : Accepted : A Clinical Study on Effect of Electro-acupuncture Treatment for Low Back Pain and Radicular Pain in Patients Diagnosed with Lumbar HIVD. Su-jin Lim, O.M.D. Sang-won Park* O.M.D., Jun-suk Lee, O.M.D. Seul-Ji Lee, O.M.D. Kie-won Kim, O.M.D., Ji-hwan Nam, O.M.D. Min-jung Lee, O.M.D. Jae-yoon Jeon, O.M.D., Ju-hyun Song, O.M.D. Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, Jaseng Hospital of Oriental Medicine *Jaseng Hospital Objectives : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of electro-acupuncture treatment for low back pain and radicular pain in patients diagnosed with Lumbar HIVD. Methods : This clinical study was carried out on 92 patients with low back pain and radicular pain diagnosed with HIVD, who had been admitted from Mar to Dec patients were divided into two groups, group A and group B, of 46 patients each. Group A was treated with electro-acupuncture treatment and general acupuncture treatment twice per day for more than 2 weeks. Group B was treated with general acupuncture treatment twice per day for more than 2 weeks. Verbal numerical rating scale(vnrs) and Oswestry disability index(odi) were used to evaluated the effectiveness of the Oriental medical treatment. Results : In both two groups, VNRS, ODI, patient s condition grade decreased significantly in ststistics as treatment was perfomed. Between the two groups there was no significant difference in the VNRS, patient s condition grade. But there was significant difference in the ODI. Conclusions : These results suggest that both electro-acupuncture and general acupuncture were effective in reducing low back pain and radicular pain caused by HIVD. More systematic clinical stuty on electro-acupuncture is needed. Key words : Low Back Pain, Radicular Pain, Lumbar HIVD, Electro-acupuncture Treatment 119

2 120

3 121

4 122

5 Table. Distribution of Age Between Group A(n=46) and Group B(n=46) Age Group A(%) Group B(%) ~19 1(2.17%) 1(2.17%) 20~29 7(15.22%) 2(4.35%) 30~39 12(26.09%) 18(39.13%) 40~49 6(13.04%) 11(29.91%) 50~59 15(32.61%) 11(29.91%) 60~69 3(6.52%) 2(4.35%) 70~ 2(4.35%) 1(2.17%) Mean SD Table. Distribution of sex Between Group A(n=46) and Group B(n=46) sex Group A(%) Group B(%) Male 22(47.82%) 19(41.30%) Female 24(52.17%) 27(58.70%) Table. Distribution of period Between Group A(n=46) and Group B(n=46) period Group A(%) Group B(%) Under 1 week 5(10.87%) 4(8.70%) Acute stage 5(10.87%) 11(29.91) Subacute stage 28(60.87%) 20(43.48) Chronic stage 8(17.39%) 11(29.91) Table. Distribution of HIVD type Between Group A(n=46) and Group B(n=46) HIVD type Group A(%) Group B(%) bulging 6(13.04%) 1(2.17%) protrusion 20(43.48) 16(34.78%) extrusion 20(43.48) 28(60.87%) 123

6 Table. Distribution of HIVD region Between Group A(n=46) and Group B(n=46) HIVD region Group A(%) Group B(%) 1 region 4(8.70%) 11(29.91%) 2 region 26(56.52%) 17(36.96%) 3 region 9(19.56%) 12(26.09%) 4 region 5(10.87%) 5(10.87%) 5 region 2(4.35%) 1(2.17%) Table. The Result of VNRS of Low Back Pain Between Group A and Group B* Admission 1 week 2 week Discharge Group A Group B * : independent t-test p<0.05. VNRS, Verbal Numberic rating scale. 124

7 Table. The Result of VNRS of Radicular Pain Between Group A and Group B* Admission 1 week 2 week Discharge Group A Group B * : independent t-test p<0.05. VNRS, Verbal Numberic rating scale. Table. The Result of ODI Between Group A and Group B* Admission 1 week 2 week Discharge Group A Group B * : independent t-test p<0.05. ODI, oswestry disability index. Table. Comparison of VNRS of Low Back Pain, VNRS of Radicular Pain and ODI Variation and Condition Grade Between Group A and Group B Group A Group B P-value VNRS(Low Back Pain) VNRS(Radicular Pain) ODI Condition Grade * : pared-sample t-test p<0.05. : VNRS, Verbal Numberic rating scale. ODI, oswestry disability index. 125

8 126

9 127

10 128

11 129

Lumbar spine

Lumbar spine CT 32 111 DOI : 10.3831/KPI.2010.13.2.111 Lumbar Spine CT 32 Received : 10. 05. 23 Revised : 10. 06. 04 Accepted : 10. 06. 11 Key Words: Disc herniation, CT scan, Clinical analysis The Clinical