Ⅱ. 노동조합에대한태도

Similar documents
ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

의정연구_36호_0828.hwp


<3037C1A4BCB1BFED5FB1E8BCBABCF65FBBE72E687770>

최종ok-1-4.hwp

1-2-2하태수.hwp

hwp


歯4차학술대회원고(황수경이상호).PDF

歯4차학술대회원고(장지연).PDF


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<302DC5EBC0CFB0FA20C6F2C8AD28BFCF292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree


<BFACBCBCC0C7BBE7C7D E687770>


Microsoft Word - NEW08_prof. Ma

<3036C0CCBCB1BFEC2E687770>

,......

<3133B1C732C8A328BCF6C1A4292E687770>

지방자치시대의 정책갈등 분석

조사연구 권 호 연구논문 한국노동패널조사자료의분석을위한패널가중치산출및사용방안사례연구 A Case Study on Construction and Use of Longitudinal Weights for Korea Labor Income Panel Survey 2)3) a


<3037C0CCC8AFB9FC5FC0CCBCF6C3A22E687770>

①국문지리학회지-주성재-OK

<3132B1C732C8A328C0DBBEF7292E687770>

大 韓 政 治 學 會 報 ( 第 23輯 1 號 ) 된지 오래다. 국회가 본연의 임무를 다 하지 못하기 때문이다. 물론 의회가 국민들로부터 불신 받는 것은 우리나라만의 문제는 아니다. 문제는 국민들이 국회에 대한 불신이 너무 크며 업무 수행 능력에 대해서도 아주 부정적으

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

창업 여성CEO의 특성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 연구

*ÅëÀϹ®Á¦ÀÌÇØÓMì272»¹®

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

44-3대지.08류주현c

<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>

歯1.PDF

<C1A4BAB8B9FDC7D031362D335F E687770>

<BACEB7CF3120B3EBB5BFBBE7B8F1B0FA20BBE7C8B8B1B3B8AE28BCF6C1A4292E687770>

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

국제무역론-02장

歯14.양돈규.hwp

<372E20B9DAC0B1C8F12DB0E62E687770>

Á¶´öÈñ_0304_final.hwp

IDP www idp or kr IDP 정책연구 한국경제의구조적문제와개혁방향 민주정책연구원 The Institute for Democracy and Policies

AIAA (I).hwp

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 19~41 석유제품브랜드의자산가치측정 : 휘발유를 중심으로 19

I&IRC5 TG_08권

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

5-김재철

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

<B9DABCBCC1A45FBCB1B9CCBCF6C1A42E687770>

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

ADU


봄호.PDF

1) 이논문은 2009 년도성신여자대학교학술연구조성비지원에의하여연구되었음. 2) Francis Fukuyama, "The End of History," National Interest, No. 16 (Summer 1989), p. 4. 3) 이러한구분에관해서는존베일리스

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

보건사회연구-25일수정

<BFA9BAD02DB0A1BBF3B1A4B0ED28C0CCBCF6B9FC2920B3BBC1F62E706466>

?6玲狙

<5BB9E8C0E7B4EBC7D0B1B35DBFACB1B8BAB8B0EDBCAD2DC3D6C1BEC3E2B7C22E687770>

ㅍㅍㅍㅍ통계지식과 경제적 상상의 구축

<C0C7B7CAC0C720BBE7C8B8C0FB20B1E2B4C9B0FA20BAAFC8AD5FC0CCC7F6BCDB2E687770>

- 2 -


< F D20C0C7B7E1B9E8BBF3B0F8C1A6C1B6C7D520C3DFC1F820B0FCB7C320BFACB1B85FBCF6C1A42E687770>

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

에너지 포커스 (제2권 제2호 통권12호, ·4)

03이경미(237~248)ok

¨ë Áö¸®ÇÐȸÁö-¼Û°æ¾ðOK

3.황아란

조재욱D)-63-88

2 大 韓 政 治 學 會 報 ( 第 18 輯 1 號 ) 과의 소통부재 속에 여당과 국회도 무시한 일방적인 밀어붙이기식 국정운영을 보여주고 있다. 민주주의가 무엇인지 다양하게 논의될 수 있지만, 민주주의 운영에 필요한 최소한의 제도적 조건은 권력 행사에서 국가기관 사이의

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

<BCBCB9CCB3AA E32392E687770>

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

논총13집.PDF

중국 상장회사의 경영지배구조에 관한 연구

< BBF3B9DDB1E228C6EDC1FD292E687770>

288 經, 35 卷 4 그러나 정작 CRM은 사용되는 상황이나 CRM을 보는 관점에 따라 그 의미가 분분 한 것이 실상이다. 예를 들면, 영업을 담당하는 사람들은 CRM을 하나의 영업전략으 로 정의하고 있는 반면, 캠페인 관리를 하는 사람은 CRM을 좀더 개인화되고

歯표지.PDF

<313329C3D6C1A4C7A52E687770>

<B7CEC4C3B8AEC6BCC0CEB9AEC7D B3E23130BFF9292E687770>

44-4대지.07이영희532~

50-5대지05장후은.indd

134 25, 135 3, (Aloysius Pieris) ( r e a l i t y ) ( P o v e r t y ) ( r e l i g i o s i t y ) 1 ) 21, 21, 1) Aloysius Pieris, An Asian Theology of Li

<B5BFC7E2B0FAC0FCB8C15F3839C8A35FBABBB9AE20C3D6C1BE20B5F0C0DAC0CE E687770>

하나님의 선한 손의 도우심 이세상에서 가장 큰 축복은 하나님이 나와 함께 하시는 것입니다. 그 이 유는 하나님이 모든 축복의 근원이시기 때문입니다. 에스라서에 보면 하나님의 선한 손의 도우심이 함께 했던 사람의 이야기 가 나와 있는데 에스라 7장은 거듭해서 그 비결을

(5차 편집).hwp

*5£00̽ÅÈ�

<2D3828C8AE29B9DAC3B5B1D42E687770>

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

<31342EBCBAC7FDBFB52E687770>

<30315FC0CCB5BFC1D65FC7D1B1B9BCBAB8C5B8C52E687770>

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

2 ㆍ 大 韓 政 治 學 會 報 ( 第 20輯 1 號 ) 와 팀스피리트 훈련 재개문제 로 모든 합의가 무산되었다. 이후 북핵문제 해결을 위해서 북ㆍ미회담이 자리 잡게 되었고, 미국이 주요 행위자로서의 역할을 수행해 왔다. 북핵문제는 우여곡절 끝에 1994년 10월 북미

20, 41..,..,.,.,....,.,, (relevant).,.,..??.,

Transcription:

글로벌금융위기이후고용형태와노동조합조합원여부에따른노동조합우호도변화에관한연구 Ⅰ. 연구목적

Ⅱ. 노동조합에대한태도

Ⅲ. 한국노동패널조사와노동조합에대한태도

(: %) :,, 8.

: = 0.05.

1) *:p<0.10, **:p<0.05, ***:p<0.01 2),.. 3) Hausman 33.81 p=0.01

IV. 결론

참고문헌 (2001),,, 13 2, 335-361. (2002), -,, 5, 237-257. (2011),,, 34 4, 139-167.,,. Bakke, E. Wight (1945), Why Workers Join Unions, Personnel, 22(1): 2-11. Bamberger, Peter A., Avraham N. Kluger, and Ronena Suchard (1999), Research Notes: The Antecedents and Consequences of Union Commitment: A Meta-Analysis, Academy of Management Journal, 42(3): 304-318. Barling, Julian, E. Kevin Kelloway, and Eric H. Bremermann, Preemployment Predictors of Union Attitudes: The Role of Family Socialization and Work Beliefs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 725-731. Bigoness, William J. and Henry, L. Tosi (1984), Correlates of Voting Behavior in a Union Decertification Election, Academy of Management Journal, 27(3): 654-659. Brett, Jeanne M. (1980), Why Employee Want Unions, Organizational Dynamics, 8(4): 273-282. Bryson, Alex, Lorenzo Cappellari and Claudio Lucifora (2004), Does Union Membership Really Reduce Job Satisfaction?, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(3): 439-459. Budd, John (2008), Labor Relations: Striking a Balance, 2nd Edition, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin. Davy, Jeanette A. and Frank Shipper (1993), Voter Behavior in Union Certification Elections : A Longitudinal Study, Academy of Management Journal, 36: 187-99. Deery, Stephen and Helen De Cieri (1991), Determinants of Trade Union Membership in Australia, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 29(1): 59-73.

Deshpande, Satish P. and Jack Fiorito (1989), Specific and General Beliefs in Union Voting Models, Academy of Management Journal, 32: 883-897. Farber, Henry S. (2005), Union Membership in the United States: The Divergence between the Public and Private Sectors, Working Papers (Princeton University, Industrial Relations Section), 503. Gallagher, Daniel G. and Magnus Sverke (2005), Contingent Employment Contracts: Are Existing Employment Theories Still Relevant?, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 26(2): 181-203. Getman, Julius B., Stephen B. Goldberg, and Jeanne B. Herman (1976), Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality, New York: Russel Sage. Glick, William, Phillip Mirvis, and Diane Harder (1977), Union Satisfaction and Participation, Industrial Relations, 16(2): 145-151. Gordon, Michael and Angelo S. Denisi (1995), A Re-Examination of the Relationship between Union Membership and Job Satisfaction, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2): 222-236. Goslinga, Sjoerd and Miagnus Sverke (2003), Atypical Work and Trade Union Membership: Union Attitudes and Union Turnover among Traditional and Atypically Employed Union Members, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(2): 290-312. Hammer, W. C. and F. J. Smith (1978), Work Attitudes as Predictors of Union Activity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 415-421. Huszczo, Gregory E. (1983), Attitudinal and Behavioral Variables Related to Participation in Union Activities, Journal of Labor Research, 4(3): 289-297. Kochan, Thomas A. (1970), How American Workers View Labor Unions, Monthly Labor Review, 22(4): 23-31. Lipset, Seymour Martin and Noah M. Meltz (2004), with Rafael Gomez and ivan katchanovski, The Paradox of American Unionism: Why Americans Like Unions More than Canadians Do But Join Much Less, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. McShane, Steven L. (1986), General Union Attitude: A Construct Validation, Journal of Labor Research, 7(4): 403-417. Newton, Lucy A. and Lynn McFarlane Shore (1992), A Model of Union Membership: Instrumentality, Commitment, and Opposition, Academy of Management Review, 17(2): 275-298. Park, Heejoon Patrick P. McHugh, and Matthew M. Bodah (2006), Revisiting General and Specific Union Beliefs : The Union-Voting Intentions of Professionals, Industrial Relations 45: 270-89. Riley, Nicola-Maria (2003), Determinants of Union Membership: A Review, Labour, 11(2): 265-301.

Schnabel, Claus (2003), Determinants of Trade Union Membership, in John T. Addison and Claus Schnabel (eds.), International Handbook of Trade Unions, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited: Cheltenham, Uniked Kingdom. Schriesheim, Chester A. (1978), Job Satisfaction, Attitude toward Unions and Voting in a Union Representation Election, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4): 548-552. Scruggs, Lyle (2002), The Ghent System and Union Membership in Europe, 1970-1996, Political Research Quarterly, 55(2): 275-297. Seidman, Joel, Jack London, and Bernard Karsh (1951), Why Workers Join Unions, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 75-83. Smith, Russel L. and Anne H. Hopkins (1979), Public Employee Attitude towards Unions, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 32(4): 484-495. Van de Vall, Mark (1970), Labor Organizations, London: Cambridge University Press. Wheeler, N. and John A. McClendon (1991), The Individual Decision to Unionize, in George Strauss, Daniel G. Gallagher, and Jack Fiorito (eds.), The State of Unions, Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.

Korean Workers Attitude towards Union by Employment Type and Union Membership after Global Financial Crisis in 2008. Young-Myon Lee, Dongguk University-Seoul In-Gang Na, Incheon National University Park, Jae-Hee, Dongguk University Attitudes towards union have been researched for a long time. However, it is still very important topic to us because it helps to predict the future of union density rate or industrial relations in general. The global financial crisis in 2008 impacted the working condition of Korean workers but the union density did not change significantly although the employment types diversified further. Employment type diversification typically reduce the solidarity of workers while the impact of global crisis may increase the solidarity of workers to protect their common working conditions. This paper aims to analyze the net result of these two contradicting forces to the attitudes toward union. After the global financial crisis in 2008, the attitudes toward union of general citizen including both wage earning and non-wage earning workers, became more favorable to union in Korea. The absolute level of the attitude were higher for permanent workers than temporary workers and higher for union members than nonmembers. However, the employment type does not make difference to the attitude although the union membership increase the attitude. This means outside impact, from global financial crisis, to employment insecurity more severely affected the attitude toward union than employment type.