, ( ) 1) ** **... (NSD) (NPD),,..,.,,.,,. I % %. (Behara, 2000). * **

Similar documents
정보화정책 제14권 제2호 Ⅰ. 서론 급변하는 정보기술 환경 속에서 공공기관과 기업 들은 경쟁력을 확보하기 위해 정보시스템 구축사업 을 활발히 전개하고 있다. 정보시스템 구축사업의 성 패는 기관과 기업, 나아가 고객에게 중대한 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로, 이에 대한 통제

untitled

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree


., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

08_¹Úö¼øöKš


요 약 제품혁신은 기업 생존의 열쇠이지만, 그 노력에 비해 성과는 미흡하다. 기업의 제품혁 신 노력을 나타내는 R&D 집약도는 한국기업의 경우 2005년 3.2%로 OECD 30개국 중 4위이 지만, 제품혁신 활동을 수행하거나 높은 차원의 혁신제품을 개발하는 기업 비율

,......

288 經, 35 卷 4 그러나 정작 CRM은 사용되는 상황이나 CRM을 보는 관점에 따라 그 의미가 분분 한 것이 실상이다. 예를 들면, 영업을 담당하는 사람들은 CRM을 하나의 영업전략으 로 정의하고 있는 반면, 캠페인 관리를 하는 사람은 CRM을 좀더 개인화되고

001지식백서_4도

Á¶´öÈñ_0304_final.hwp

ecorp-프로젝트제안서작성실무(양식3)

15_3oracle

슬라이드 1


¨ë Áö¸®ÇÐȸÁö-¼Û°æ¾ðOK

시안

03¼ºÅ°æ_2

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

최종ok-1-4.hwp

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache


untitled

창업 여성CEO의 특성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 연구

훈련교재 목록-내지-0520.indd


20(53?)_???_O2O(Online to Offline)??? ???? ??.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

, ( ) 1) *.. I. (batch). (production planning). (downstream stage) (stockout).... (endangered). (utilization). *

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

FSB-6¿ù-³»Áö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 19~41 석유제품브랜드의자산가치측정 : 휘발유를 중심으로 19

12È«±â¼±¿Ü339~370

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

20, 41..,..,.,.,....,.,, (relevant).,.,..??.,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

구로구민체육센터 여성전용 기구필라테스 강좌 신설 구로구시설관리공단은 신도림생활체육관에서 2014년도부터 시행하여 주민의 큰 호응을 얻고있는 기구필라 테스 강좌를 일자로 구로구민체육센터에 확대 시행하게 되었습니다. 구로구 관내 고객들의 니즈를 반영한 기

Microsoft Word - NEW08_prof. Ma

요 약 대한민국은 1948년 정부수립 이후 60년 만에 세계 13위의 경제대국으로 비약적인 성 장을 이루었다. 정부수립 2년 만에 북한의 전격 남침으로 전 국토가 초토화되었고, 휴 전 이후에도 안보에 대한 위협은 계속되었다. 그러나 대한민국 국민은 불리한 여건에 좌절하

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

2017 1

1-3-2 윤기웅, 김진영, 공동성.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Main Title

04±èºÎ¼º

44-4대지.07이영희532~

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

<3037C0CCC8AFB9FC5FC0CCBCF6C3A22E687770>

No Title

< FC1A4BAB8B9FDC7D D325FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

, ( ) * 1) *** *** (KCGS) 2003, 2004 (CGI),. (+),.,,,.,. (endogeneity) (reverse causality),.,,,. I ( ) *. ** ***

, (, 2000) (public management),,, ( ), (Parasuraman, 1988), Lacobucci(1996) (consumer evaluation),,, ( ) ( E x p e c t a t i o n ) (, 2001) Parasurama

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

untitled

LG Electronics Inc. I 2002 I Based on its insight into the needs of the digital age and on its innovative technology, LG Electronics is aiming t

<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

최종보고서.PDF


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Oracle Apps Day_SEM

<303720C7CFC1A4BCF86F6B2E687770>

07_À±¿ø±æ3ÀüºÎ¼öÁ¤

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>


<C7C1B7A3C2F7C0CCC1EE20B4BABAF1C1EEB4CFBDBA20B7B1C4AA20BBE7B7CA5FBCADB9CEB1B35F28C3D6C1BE292E687770>

<30315FC0CCB5BFC1D65FC7D1B1B9BCBAB8C5B8C52E687770>

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

학습영역의 Taxonomy에 기초한 CD-ROM Title의 효과분석

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

2013년 중소기업 플러스 제5호_최종본.hwp

I

??윕햳??

ÀÌÀç¿ë Ãâ·Â

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

부문별 에너지원 수요의 변동특성 및 공통변동에 미치는 거시적 요인들의 영향력 분석

< B3E220C0CCBDB4C6E4C0CCC6DB2DB9E8B0E6C8AD28C3D6C1BEBCF6C1A4BABB E687770>

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

16, al, 1998)., (Davenport & Prusak, 1998;, 1999). 10,,.., (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995).,...,,.,.

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

2

untitled

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

44-6대지.08김정희-5

이제는 쓸모없는 질문들 1. 스마트폰 열기가 과연 계속될까? 2. 언제 스마트폰이 일반 휴대폰을 앞지를까? (2010년 10%, 2012년 33% 예상) 3. 삼성의 스마트폰 OS 바다는 과연 성공할 수 있을까? 지금부터 기업들이 관심 가져야 할 질문들 1. 스마트폰은

<30312DC1A4BAB8C5EBBDC5C7E0C1A4B9D7C1A4C3A52DC1A4BFB5C3B62E687770>

Transcription:

, 40 1 2 (2006 6 ) 1) ** **... (NSD) (NPD),,..,.,,.,,. I.. 1990 46.7% 2003 12 73.5%. (Behara, 2000). * **

308, 40 1 2,., (Fitzsimmons, et al., 2000)... (, 1999)., (Behara, 2000)..,....,... (Boone, 2000).,..

309. (NSD) (NPD),, 124. II. OECD 60%,, 70%. 2002 8 63.4%, 2000 57.5%, 1995 51.3%, 1990 48.4% ( ). 1990. 2002 12 71.5% 65.7%. [ 1],,... (de Brentani, 1989). : % 71.7 68.5 68.9 67.7 71.1 70.9 71.5 73.7 : OECD(2002), National Accounts of OECD Countries (2002),, p. 27.

310, 40 1 2 100 90 80 70 71.5 구성비 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 년도 한국미국일본.., (Avlonitis, Papastaopoulou & Gounaris, 2001). (Fitzsimmons, et al., 2000).. (Edgett & Parkinson, 1994; Vermeulen, 2001).,. (Avlonitis et al., 2001)...

311 (Johne et al., 1998).. (Larsen, 2001)... (Vermeulen et al., 2002)., (Meyer et al., 2001).. 60%,.. 3.8 5.4. [ 2]., ()..,.. < 2>.

312, 40 1 2 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 라인계획 전략개발 개념창출 서비스 개념스크린 제조 사업성 분석 개발 시험및타당성분석 제조개발 상품화 NSD NPD 3.8 5.4 -- - - 1.7 2, R&D NPD NSD. NPD NSD. : Griffin(1997). de Brentani(2001),,,. < 3>.

313 NSD NPD. / (me-too)..... NSD NSD : de Brentani(2001) Johne(1998),,. Lovelock(1984)..,,,,

314, 40 1 2.. (Johne et al., 1998). Johne(1998),, (offer). (opportunity analysis)..,.., (Johne et al., 1998)..,,,..........,. (offer) 1)

315 /... (offering).....,.,,,,,. III.. (de Brentani, 2001), 1) offer.,,,.,,, (, 1994).

316, 40 1 2 (Johne et al., 1998).., (Cooper & Kleinschmidt, 1994) (Griffin & Hauser, 1993; Song & Parry, 1997). [ 3]. de Brentani(1989)... (Mahadvan et al.,1998). (Li et al., 1998).. Jaworski Kohli(1993).,. Cooper(1999)...

317 1:. 1-1:. 1-2:. 1-3:. 2:. 2-1:. 2-2:. 2-3:.. Froehle(2000)

318, 40 1 2.,..,. Martin Horne(1993) 16 80.,. (Avlonotis et al., 2001). (Rochford et al., 1997). 3:. 3-1:. 3-2:. 3-3:. 4:. 4-1:. 4-2:. 4-3:. ( ).

319. Martin Horne(1993)... Cooper(1995)... (Moore, 1987). Crawford.,,,,, (Martin & Horne, 1993). (Johnson et al., 2000; Cooper & Kleinschmidt, 1995). (strategic vision). (Fitzsimmons et al., 2000). 5:. 5-1:. 5-2:. 5-3:. 6:. 6-1:.

320, 40 1 2 6-2:. 6-3:. IV.., (, 2001; Heskett et al., 1990). 2003 9 5 6, 2003 9 15 10 15,. 54, 36, 38 128. 4 124.,. Likert 7 (1: 7: ).

321,,, 42 5. < 5>. () Giffin & Hauser(1993) Li & Calantine(1998) Day & Wensley(1992) Li & Calantine(1998) Zeithaml(1998) Sujan, Weitz, & Kumar(1994) Griffin(1997) Cooper & Kleinschmidt(1995) Cohen & Levinthalvl(1990) Lievens & Moenaert(2001) Noori, Munro, Deszca, Cohen(1997) de Brentani(1995)

322, 40 1 2 Noori, Munro, Deszca, Cohen(1997) Cooper & Kleinschmidt(1995) Martin & Horne(1993) Cooper & Kleinschmidt(1995) Page(1993) 3 () () 3 ( ) Griffin(1997) Griffin & Page(1996) Cooper & Kleinschmidt(1995) Cooper(1999) Brown & Eisenhardt(1995) Cooper & Kleinschmidt(1995).,. SPSS ver. 11.0.

323 (61.29%) (38.71%), 10 56.45%, 50 20.16%. < 9>. (%) (%) 76 61.29 23 18.55 48 38.71 25 20.16 5 40 32.26 29 23.39 6-10 30 24.19 4 3.23 11-20 7 5.65 17 13.71 21-30 13 10.48 26 20.97 31-40 6 4.84 20 37 29.84 41-50 3 2.42 30 43 34.68 50 25 20.16 40 29 23.39 49 39.52 50 14 11.30 75 60.49 60 1 0.81 KMO(Kaiser Meyer Olkin) 0.60. Bartlett. ( &, 2003). KMO 0.60, Bartlett 0.05. KMO 0.849

324, 40 1 2 Bartlett 0.000. KMO 0.788 Bartlett 0.000. KMO 0.739 Bartlett 0.000. 0.5.. < 10> < 13>... 0.7 (, 1999). 0.60 0.8. 1 2 3.876.821 10.742.8180.894.865.669.634.630.648.849.769.815.788.862.802.887.878.820.791.640.641 15.821.8209 49.816.8885

325 1 2 3.741.666.866.820.860.783.750.593.886.798.883.837.929.872.859.785.793.686.813.734.928.859.928.903.859.743 22.197.8615 22.880.8724 30.394.9238 1 2 3.766.790.781.691.824.741.604.674.813.752.774.683.814.676.755.666.903.821.828.704.804.663 11.953.7976 24.378.7668 34.447.8522

326, 40 1 2 1 2.884.805.899.830.792.773 ().913.877 ().917.890 ( ).792.661 21.756.8648 58.859.8822. < 15>. < 15> VIF 2.007., t 5.224, t 5.119.. β t R 2 F VIF.139 1.647 1.270 -.171-1.681 0.259 13.95** 1.791.537 5.224** 2.007.093 1.105 1.270 -.079 -.784 0.266 14.49** 1.794.524 5.119** 2.007 * : p 0.10 ** : p 0.05

327. < 16>. < 16> VIF 0.821., t 2.743, t 2.230, t 1.715., t 4.187, t 2.728, t 1.974.. β t R2 F VIF.159 1.715*.756.198 2.230** 0.223 11.50**.821.254 2.743**.755.231 2.728**.756.161 1.974** 0.347 21.21**.821.355 4.187**.755 * : p 0.10; ** : p 0.05. < 17>. < 17> VIF 1.5., t 4.815, t 1.821

328, 40 1 2.,. t 5.327 t 3.099.,,. β t R2 F VIF.171 1.821* 1.500.437 4.815**.296 16.780** 1.080 -.038 -.480 1.405.106 1.185 1.500.462 5.357**.365 22.966** 1.080.234 3.099** 1.405 * : p 0.10; ** : p 0.05 V... < 20>.,.....

329 (5%) 1. 1-1. 1-2. 1-3. 2. 2-1. 2-2. 2-3. 3. 3-1. 3-2. 3-3. 4. 4-1. 4-2. 4-3. 5. 5-1. 5-2. 5-3. 6. 6-1. 6-2. 6-3.,.,..

330, 40 1 2.,.,..... (2001), :,,, 24(3), 89-105. 박정민, 나상균 (2003), SPSS 11.0을이용한통계분석, 법문사, 서울. (1999), -(CS),,. (1994), - -,,. (2002),,, 25-41. Avlonitis, G.J., Papastaopoulou, P.G. & Gounaris, S.P. (2001), An empirically-based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure screnarios, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 324-342. Behara, R.S. (2000), Process Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Service, in J.A. Fitsimmons and M.J. Fitsimmons (eds.) New Service Development, Sage Publications Inc., 138-151.

331 Boone, T. (2000), Exploring the Link Between Product and Process Innovation in Services, in J.A. Fitsimmons and M. J. Fitsimmons (eds.) New Service Development, Sage Publications Inc., 92-110. Cohen, W.M. & Levinthalv, D.A. (1990), Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152. Cooper, R.G. & Edgett, S.J. (1999), Product developmetn for the service sector-lessons from market leaders, Perseus Book, Cambridge, M.A. Cooper, R.C. & Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1995), Benchmarking the firm's critical success fators in new product development, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 374-391. Cooper, R.C. & Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1994), Determinants of timeliness in product development, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 381-396. de Brentani U. (2001), Innovative versus incremental new business service: Different keys for achieving success, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 169-187. de Brentani, U. (1989), Success and failure in new industrial services, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 6(2), 239-258. Day, G. & Wensley, R. (1994), The Capabilities of Market Driven Organizations, Journal of Marketing, 58(Oct.), 37-52. Edgett, S. & Parkinson, S. (1994), The development of new finacial service: Identifying determinats of success and failure, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 5(4), 24-38. Fitzsimmons, J.A. & Fitzsimmons, M.J. (2000), Service Management Operations, Stratrgy and Information Technology, 3rded, McGraw-Hill, New York. Froehle, C., Roth, A.V., Chase, R.B. & Voss, C. (2000), Antecedents of new Service Development Effectiveness: An Exploratory Examination of Strategic Operations Choices, Student Paper. Griffin, A. (1997), PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices, Journal Product Innovation

332, 40 1 2 Management, 14, 429-458. Griffin, A. & Hauser, J.R. (1993), The Voice of the Customer, Marketing Science, 12(1), 1-27. Heskett, J.L., Sasser, Jr. W.E. & Hart, C.W. (1990), Service Breakthoughs: Changing the Rules of the Game, NewYork, Free Press. Jaworski, B.J. & Kohli, A.K. (1993), Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences, Journal of Marketing, 57, 53-70. Johne, A. & Storey C. (1996), New service development: a review of the literature and annotated bibliography, European Journal of Marketing, 32(3/4), 184-251. Johnson, S.P., Mennor, L.J., Roth A.V. & Chase R.B. (2000), A Critical Evaluation of the New Service Development Process, in J.A. Fitzsimmons and M. J. Fitzsimmons (eds.) New Service Development, Sage Publications Inc., 1-18. Larsen, J.N. (2001), Human Resources and Social Practice: The Knowledge-Intensive Business Service Firm as a Distributed Knowledge System, The Service Industries Journal, 21(1), 81-102. Li, T. & Calantone, R.J. (1998), The Impact of market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination, Journal of Marketing, 62(Oct.), 13-29. Lovelock, C.H. (1983), Classifying Services to Gain Strategic Marketing Insight, Journal of Marketing, 47, 2-18. Madhavan, R. & Grover, R. (1998), From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management, Journal of Marketing, 62(10), 1-12. Meyer, M.C. & DeTore A. (2001), PERSPECTIVE: Creating a platfom-based approach for developing new services, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 188-204. Noori, H., Munro, H., Deszca, G., Cohen M. (1997), Managing the P/SDI Process: Best-in-class principles and leading practices, International Journal of Technology Management, 13(3), 245-268.

333 Rochford L. & Rudelius W. (1997), New Product development process: Stages amd success in the medical industry, Industrial Marketing Management, 26, 67-84. Sujan, H., Weitz B.A. & Kumar N. (1994), Learning Orientation, Working Smart and Effective Selling, Journal of Marketing, 58(7), July, 39-52. Vermeulen, P. & Dankbaar, B. (2002), The Organization of Product Innovation in the Financial Sector, The Service Industries Journal, 21(1), 81-102. Zeithaml, V.A. & Bitner, M.J. (1998), Service Marketing, McGraw-Hill, New York.

334, 40 1 2 Success Factors for New Service Development in Travel Industry 2)Sang-Chul Jung** Myeong-Suk Kim** The purpose of this study is to find the critical factors for successful new service development, and to identify the relationships between NSD success factors and performances in domestic travel industry. In the results, we confirmed the following consequences. First, the study presented the theoretical basis for setting the new service concept and the business strategy for a firm to develop new service by providing relationships of NSD factors and NSD performance. Second, we find that success factors for NSD are market-related, company-related and development process-related. Third, Relations between success factors for New Service Development and performances are clarified. *Professor, College of Economis & Management, Chungnam National University **Part-time lecturer, Chungnam National University/Pai Chai University