20, 41..,..,.,.,....,.,, (relevant).,.,..??.,

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "20, 41..,..,.,.,....,.,, (relevant).,.,..??.,"

하나 노
5 years ago
Views:

1 , 41 ( ) * 1) *** ***,. IMF..,,,.,,,,.. I (,.),, *. ** *** 19

2 20, 41..,..,.,.,....,.,, (relevant).,.,..??.,

3 ,. II G. G. Muller International Accounting ,,,. 1972, 1973 (International Accounting Standards Committee: IASC). IASC,,,,,,,,, IASC Board. IASC. IASC 1983 (International Federation of

4 22, 41 Accountants: IFAC), IFAC IASC IASC (Core Standards) (International Organization of Securities Commissions: IOSCO). (International Accounting Standards: IAS) IASC,. 1) IASC IAS, 1999 IASC (IASC 1999) IASC IASB(International Accounting Standards Board). (IASC).,.,. 2). IASC IASB IASC IASB. IASC, 1) IASC (, 2004)., (IASC 1999, 1997).,.,., IASC.,., IASC. 2), ( ).

5 23., IASB. IASB (board members). IASB board member part-time pull-time,.,.. (IASB) (IFRSs, 2004).,.,.. (IAS) (IFRSs) (convergence). IASB, IASC. IASB, IASB IASC (IAS). IASC 2001 IASB, IASB IAS

6 24, 41 IFRSs IAS 7 IFRSs. (IFRSs) 3) (European Union: EU). EU.,,,,,,, ),,, ), , ), IBRD.,., ) (IAS) (IFRSs),. 4) IASB News ) Convergence 2002, International Forum for Accountancy Development: IFAD. 6) Deloitte & Touche, (, ) 104 ( ).

7 , 3 (convergence). 3, IASB. 3 (a joint working group), (convergence). III IBRD ,.,...

8 26, 41 (Korea Accounting Standards Board: KASB) (mission),,.,.,. ( ) 28 7),. 100%.,. 8),.,.,. 7) , , 100 3, 101, 102, 103, 28. 8) (KASB) ( ) (IAS IFRS). 34. Road map K-IFRS.

9 ,..,.,,,, (Statement of Changes in Owners Equity)..,. 21,.,,,,..

10 28, 41.,.,,.. ( ),,,.,,..,,.,..,,,,,.,,.,..., 11,.,.,

11 29.,...,....,..,..,. (, 2005)....,.,, ( ),, ( )

12 30, 41,,....,., , (2006 ) 90%. 9),., ( ),, 9),, 15 3, 2006, p. 167.

13 31.,..,.,.,...,,,,,,.,,,,.,..,. 10) K-IFRSs. 3, , ) ( ).

14 32, ,. (complete convergence),. IV.,., ,.,..,.. (global standards).,..

15 33.. Korea Discount,..,.,.,, market risk.,.,,. 11),.,..., 11). IASB Tweedie,,, (2005).. Covrig, DeFond, and Hung(2007),.

16 34, 41,. (local firms),.,.,..,,,,,,.,.,,..,..,.. 12). 12).

17 35,..,....,.,. 13),.. (interactive),..,.., 13),,,,, (, :, [ ], 2004).

18 36, 41..,..,,...,,..,. 14).,.. 14)..,..

19 37,..,....,,,,.,....,..,.,.. 15),... 15),, 5,, 2006, p. 267.

20 38, 41.,.,,.,...,... 16). 17) (convergence), 100%..,,.,,, 16),.,., K-IFRS (, Road Map( ), 2006). 17) IASB,., (, Road Map( ), 2006).

21 39..,,,.,.,....,.,,.. V.,. 1990,.

22 40, ,..,,.,.,.,., (IASB)..,..,.,. 2009,.

23 ,..,...,.,. (1994).. 2. (2000)...

24 42, 41,, (2006) , ,, (2004) ,, (2003).. 14.,, (2006). :, (2005) , (1997) (2004). :. 16. (2000) (2005)..., (2003) (2004)... (1998). :. Journal of Business Research 13., (2003) (2004) (2006)

25 43 (1998). :. Journal of Business Research 13. Choi, F., and G. Mueller (1993). Globalization of Financial Accounting and Reporting. Financial Executives Research Foundation. Covrig, V., L. DeFond, and M. Hung (2007). Home bias, Foreign Mutual Fund Holdings, and the Voluntary Adoption of International Accounting Standards. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (No. 1): Mueller, G., H Gernon, and G. Meek (1997). Accounting: An International Perspective. (3rd ed.). Irwin. Schipper, K. (2005). The Introduction of International Accounting Standards in Europe: Implications for International Convergence. European Accounting Review 14 (No. 1): Sir Tweedie, D., and T. Seidenstein (2005). Setting a Global Standard: The Case for Accounting Convergence: Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 25 (Spring):

26 44, 41 The Impact and Evaluation of International Accounting Standards on Korean Accounting Standards 18)Sang-Oh Nam* Tai-Yun Kim** ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to deal with two things: first, exploring the impact of International Accounting Standards (IAS or IFRSs) on the revision and change of Korean Accounting Standards and second, evaluating this impact in the era of fully adopting International Accounting Standards as the Korean GAAP. Our result is that International Accounting Standards have made very great influence on the revision and change of Korean Accounting Standards since the Korean financial crisis of We evaluate separately the advantages and the disadvantages in the influence of International Accounting Standards on Korean Accounting Standards. The advantages are as follows: Firstly, this improves the international recognition of Korean Accounting practices as well as our recognition. Secondly, Global firms of Korea can reduce cost in relation to making their financial statements because these firms do not have to make financial statements twice. Thirdly, we can reduce short-term expenses of making accounting standards. The disadvantages are as follows: Firstly, we may endure negative effects on the usefulness of accounting information when International Accounting Standards neglect the inherent characteristics of Korean situation. Secondly, the full adoption of new accounting principles would mean immediate extra costs and more burdens to us. Thirdly, we would lose our right to make our own * Professor, College of Business Administration, Seoul National University ** Student of Master s Course, College of Business Administration, Seoul National University

27 45 accounting principles in the era of International Accounting Standards, so we worry about a problem of the accounting sovereignty. And lastly, we will have more expenses of making accounting standards in the long run. The conclusion is that we should make a careful plan realistically to maximize our interests in the rapidly changing circumstances. We think this will be essential because the current general situation of the full adoption of International Accounting Standards cannot be changed. Keywords: International Accounting Standards, IAS, IFRSs, Korean Accounting Standards, Korean GAAP

204 205

204 205 -Road Traffic Crime and Emergency Evacuation - 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 Abstract Road Traffic Crime