ª Œª Œ 26ƒ 1A Á œ pp. 213 ~ 218 gj pœw y ey y gj p k p Characterization of Compressive Strength and Elastic Modulus of Recycled Aggregate Concre

Similar documents
14.531~539(08-037).fm

10(3)-10.fm

12.077~081(A12_이종국).fm

17.393~400(11-033).fm

< DC1A4C3A5B5BFC7E22E666D>

27(5A)-07(5806).fm

fm

w w l v e p ƒ ü x mw sƒw. ü w v e p p ƒ w ƒ w š (½kz, 2005; ½xy, 2007). ù w l w gv ¾ y w ww.» w v e p p ƒ(½kz, 2008a; ½kz, 2008b) gv w x w x, w mw gv

27(5A)-13(5735).fm

82-01.fm

10(3)-09.fm

10(3)-11.fm

605.fm

15.101~109(174-하천방재).fm

23(2) 71.fm

82.fm

69-1(p.1-27).fm

416.fm

10(3)-12.fm

14(4) 09.fm

304.fm

9(3)-4(p ).fm

10(3)-02.fm

105.fm

16(1)-3(국문)(p.40-45).fm

fm

( )-113.fm

untitled

14.fm

07.051~058(345).fm

50(1)-09.fm

fm

202.fm

05.581~590(11-025).fm

untitled

(k07-057).fm

<30332DB9E8B0E6BCAE2E666D>

32(4B)-04(7455).fm

26(3D)-17.fm

<30312DC0CCC7E2B9FC2E666D>

06.177~184(10-079).fm

untitled

50(5)-07.fm

10(1)-08.fm

57.fm

12(2)-04.fm

12(4) 10.fm

27(6A)-10(5570).fm

13.fm

untitled

3.fm

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

12(3) 10.fm

15(2)-07.fm

11(5)-12(09-10)p fm

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

23(4) 06.fm

50(4)-10.fm

15.529~536(11-039).fm

<312D303128C1B6BAB4BFC1292E666D>

83.fm

85.fm

49(6)-06.fm

93.fm

4.fm

16(5)-06(58).fm

진성능을 평가하여, 로프형 및 밴드형 FRP가 심부구속 철근 의 대체 재료로서의 가능성을 확인하였으며, 홍원기(2004)등 은 탄소섬유튜브의 횡구속효과로 인한 강도증가 및 휨 성능 의 향상을 입증하였다. 이전의 연구중 대부분은 섬유시트 및 튜브의 형태로 콘크 리트의 표

14(2) 02.fm

16(5)-03(56).fm

fm

fm

89.fm

( )-71.fm

( )-77.fm

( )-53.fm

19(1) 02.fm

16(5)-04(61).fm

( )-69.fm

8(3)-15(p ).fm

10.063~070(B04_윤성식).fm

8(2)-4(p ).fm

(163번 이희수).fm

87.fm

( )-123.fm

51(2)-09.fm

16(2)-7(p ).fm

15.fm

16(4)-05.fm

14.091~100(328-하천방재).fm

( )-84.fm

25(3c)-03.fm

11(1)-15.fm

27(5A)-15(5868).fm

62.fm

fm

04.fm

31(3B)-07(7055).fm

201.fm

93-09.fm

한 fm

Transcription:

26ƒ 1A Á 2006 1œ pp. 213 ~ 218 gj pœw y ey y gj p k p Characterization of Compressive Strength and Elastic Modulus of Recycled Aggregate Concrete with Respect to Replacement Ratios Á Á Á½ Sim, JongsungÁPark, CheolwooÁPark, Sung JaeÁKim, Yong Jae Abstract As a manufacturing process of recycled aggregate improves the quality of recycled aggregate shall be sufficient enough to be used for structural concrete. This study characterized compressive strength and elastic modulus of concrete that used recycled coarse and fine aggregate. Before the strength tests, the fundamental characteristics of recycled aggregate were preliminarily analyzed and the recycled aggregate satisfied the class 1 requirements in KS F 2573. As the replacement ratio increased, the compressive strength and elastic modulus of recycled aggregate concrete decreased. When the coarse and fine aggregates were completely replaced with the recycled, the compressive strength and elastic modulus were decreased by 13% and 31%, respectively. Based on the test results, this study suggests equations for predicting the compressive strength and elastic modulus of the recycled aggregate concrete with respect to the replacement ratio. The values from the equations were in good agreement with the test data from this study and others. Keywords: recycled aggregate, recycled aggregate concrete, compressive strength, elastic modulus š y t wš, gj p w w ƒ» k y y y ey mwš w. x y y KS F 2573 1» w, y e y ƒw y gj p k w w ùkû. p y ey w k gj p 13% 31%ƒ w. w x» y ey y gj p k w,» ü x w k mw. w : y, y gj p,, k 1. p, š v ƒw yy gj p w». w gj p 70% wš», yw w gj p t w, j w w w. ù x ü w w ƒ ƒ š. 2004 w w ü 2004 (2 6 8 m 3 )» * z Áw w m y œw ** Á z Áw w m y œw BK21 (E-mail: tiger1park@hotmail.com) ***w w m y œw ****w» œ wz 40 œ ƒ w š š (w gœ xz, 2004). ƒ ƒw š. z ù w» w y gj p wš ù, ¾ w yw k ( m, 2004).» y w (û, 1995;, 2004; Hansen, 1992; Mukai, 1979; Rashwan, 1997; Salem, 2003) y y gj p 26ƒ 1A 2006 1œ 213

ü w w. w y gj p f p gj p w š œ» 1% ƒ š w. p k 15% 20% w. ü y w gj p w y, y gj p» mwš k p q w ù ƒ y ey k wš w. 2. x t 1. y ey x Recycled Aggregate Replacement Ratio Specimen Coarse aggregate Fine aggregate NN - - RN Recycled 100% - RR30 Recycled 100% Recycled 30% RR60 Recycled 100% Recycled 60% RR Recycled 100% Recycled 100% x y ey y gj p k p q w» w t 1 5ƒ ey x w, y t, k w w w w w w. 2.1 w» s, w ƒ 1:1 yw œ w y š w KS F 2573(gj p ) 1 y y w (t 2, 3 ). e Property KS F 2573 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 y 25 mm y» w x ww. y sw w KS F 2576( w x ) d w. d, y 0.71%» 0.4%» sw, s ù ƒ. y,»» ƒ q w» ƒ» w x w w. y» w d w» w, KS F 2510(gj p sw» x ) KS F 2514( k w» w w x ) w. x, 3% yùp e k y t w yƒ, k yùp» z ƒ 92%. y ƒ 90% ³ w 90% w. w w d w» w KS F 2511( sw (0.08 mm m w ) x ) w x w. x, y 2.1% 2.8% gj pt x 5% y t» w 7% w. p m sp p, yy ùv k š AE w. x ü y gj p w w e, x w w š w. y ey t 4 ey» w, š w 45 MPa, v 10 cm, œ» 5%, 44% w w. 2.2 x x ϕ100ü200 mm x œ 1 z t 2. Recycled Coarse Aggregate Natural Crushed C. A. RCA Quality Standard (MOCT) Used KS F 2527 Used Absorption (%) ß 3.0 1.82 ß 3.0 0.47 ß 3.0 ß 5.0 ß 7.0 Density (g/cm 3 ) à 2.2 à 2.5 2.61 à 2.5 2.64 Abrasion (%) ß 40 ß 40 21.5 ß 40 24.1 Solid Volume (%) à 55 à 55 60.3 à 55 55.4 Property KS F 2573 Class 1 Class 2 t 3. Recycled Fine Aggregate Natural F. A. RCA Quality Standard (MOCT) Used KS F 2527 Used Absorption (%) ß 5.0 4.55 ß 3.0 1.16 ß 5.0 ß 10.0 Density (g/cm 3 ) à 2.2 à 2.2 2.43 à 2.5 2.61 214

kxwš 20Û2 o C 28 mw w. x KS F 2405(gj p x ) w w. k œ t w ƒ w» x w w x d w w. 3. x 3.1 v œ» gj p wt ww z d v œ» 1 ey w ùkü. v w 12 cm v ùkü. y eyw v 1cm ƒw, ey 100% k ey ƒw v 5cm ƒ ƒw. y w gj p f pƒ w š, q x eš ù xk ƒ ù, ey y ƒ š j ü w xk, š vƒ j gj p, vg w f p y gj pƒ y w ùkù. œ» 4.3%, y ey 0.4% ƒ ey ƒw w ƒ w ùkü. w, 1 w y ey œ» y w ùkû. y w gj p v œ» - p,, y œ, yy yy ƒ ùký, x w mw v œ» w p q w w. 1. y ey v œ» y 2. y ey y 3.2 d 2 w. y ey ƒw w w ùkü. y 100% eyw 2MPa x, y eyw 4MPa ƒ x ùkû. w y ey»» ey 30% ü, w, ey 30%»»ƒ j ùkû. (2004) w y ey 60%»» ƒw ùkû. y gj p ey 30-60% j y ƒ. w w y ey y gj p w wš w, (1) w. w g j p» y ey z š w, w xk w. w w x x l y gj p w x y w y w j q, ey w w (1) xk w. w w x w x ƒ v wù, y gj p y t w j» j, w x ƒ ü w z w» w, š w y w w 30-50 MPa y gj p ww. f = ckr f 0.017 ck G 0.04S», f ckr y gj p (MPa), f ck gj p (MPa), G y ey (%), S y ey (%). x l y gj p (1) 26ƒ 1A 2006 1œ 215

3.» x» (½, 2004; ½, 2003; ½y, 2003;, 2001;, 2001; ³, 1999, 2003; x, 2001;, 2002;, 2004a, 2004b;, 2003) w (1) Á mw. 3» y gj p x x w ü x d w ùküš. 3 w d w ƒ š w. 30 MPa w x w û w š ù,» j q, w ww k. = y ey y t 4. gj p w Specimen NN W/C(%) S/a (%) W C 4. k d gj p wš yw w, y w gj p, w x w» y q. 3.3 k x l w k 4 ùkù ƒ y ey ƒw k w. y eyw gj p k 8GPa d. t 5 x w y gj p d k (2) xw gj p» (gj p ƒ 30 MPa ) gj p k w ùküš. E c 0.03ω1.5 f ck + 7.700( f ck 30MPa, w = 1, 450~2,500kg m 3 ) (2) Unit volume weight (kg/m 3 ) C. A. F. A. Natural Recycled Natural Recycled 851.4 0 661.7 0 RN 0 841.7 661.7 0 RR30 33 44 189.1 580.5 0 841.7 463.2 184.8 RR60 0 841.7 264.7 369.7 RR 0 841.7 0 616.1 t 5. k d HRWRA (kg) AE (g) 4.4 22 Specimen f ck E, by test E, by KCI E, from eq. (3) (MPa) Reduction (%) (MPa) Reduction (%) (MPa) Reduction (%) (MPa) Reduction (%) NN 45.0-24,185-29,836-29897 - RN 43.3 3.8% 20,440 15.5% 29,417 1.4% 28058 6.2% RR30 42.8 4.8% 17,981 25.7% 29,292 1.8% 26902 10.0% RR60 41.7 7.3% 20,000 17.3% 28,870 3.2% 25485 14.8% RR 39.1 13.1% 16,516 31.7% 28,325 5.1% 23881 20.1% 216

», E c gj p k (MPa), w gj p (kg/m 3 ), f ck gj p (MPa). x gj p d 5GPa ƒ w. k z w w w w x ƒ w q. ù y gj p ey ƒw k gj p w j ùkù, w xw gj p» w x w wš. 4 xw gj p» k»» y w ùkùš, gj p k y gj p w w q y gj p w k w. E = cr 0.03ω1.5 f 1 700 ckr +(, 14.2G 10.9S) ( f ck 30MPa, w 1, 450~2, 500kg m 3 = )», E cr y w w gj p k (MPa), w gj p (kg/m 3 ), f ckr y gj p y gj p (MPa), G y ey (%), S y ey (%).» w k x w» š ƒ w, gj p k w ey w w ƒw y gj p y ey k š w. w, 4 ey ƒw y gj p k y w. ƒ x l y gj p k» 5. k» x (3) (½, 2004;, 2001; ³, 2003;, 2002) w (3) Á mw 5 ùkü. 5 w (3) w x w z, xw gj p» gj p( 30 MPa ) k y gj p w. 5 l w y gj p k yw w ùkû, w xw g j p» y w gj p š w w š y w» ƒ j. xw gj p» w y gj p k w j k ƒ û, y w w, y gj p ƒ û ù y ey, j w. 4. š y w gj p gj p p ƒ, w y gj p w, gj p ù w ƒ» e k p w. w w k y gj p gj p w vƒ j y x» w q. w y gj p y ey œ» y j w q. ù y ey ƒw w, eyw 4% eyw 13% x. w p» y y ey w w,» mw yw. w, y gj p k d w, w ùkü. w y ey k s eyw 15%, y eyw 31% ƒ. w x k y ey k w w, k» w de eƒ w. y w gj p k w ey w w, w y w gj p ù w y w q. w x, w œw ƒ 26ƒ 1A 2006 1œ 217

q. w y» w sgj p š ƒƒe y» w w w s gj p š ƒƒe y w» y w. š x m (2004) y t» ( ). pp. 2-27. ½, «t, t, y (2003) w gj p» w x. w gj pwz ƒ w tz, 15«, 2y, pp. 116-119. ½,, y, ½ûy(2004) gj p q p x. w wz, w wz 6«, 1y, pp. 37-45. ½y,,,, x(2003) w gj p w p w x. w gj pwz w tz, 15«, 1y, pp. 25-30. û (1995) gj p œw p w x. w, û w, pp. 35-40., k ³, (2001) v yww gj p ü. w gj pwz, w gj pwz, 13«, 1y, pp. 23-29., y, x, x³(2004) t p w. w wz w t z, 2004, pp. 195-198., y, t,,, ½ w(2001) s» š gj p p w x. w gj pwz w tz, 13«, 1y, pp. 495-500. ³, y(1999) ey gj p w p. w gj pwz ƒ w tz, 11«, 2y, pp. 119-122. ³, y, y(2003) gj p ü w x. wm wz, wm wz, 23«, 1Ay, pp. 85-93. x, ey(2001) š gj p p. w gj pwz, w gj pwz, 13«, 6y, pp. 575-583. (2004) v e p w v y gj p sƒ. w, w w, pp. 34-54.,,,, ½ (2004a) t gj p œw p. w gj pwz ƒ w tz, 16«, 2y, pp. 197-200.,, ½ (2004b) št w gj p p. w gj pwz w tz, 16«, 1 y, pp. 384-387.,,», ½w, (2002) ƒ gj p e w. w gj pwz ƒ w tz, 14«, 2y, pp. 233-238., y, ¼x(2003) gj p yw gj p. wm wz»w z, pp. 2922-2926. w gœ xz(2004) w. pp. 1-43. Hansen, T.C. (1992) Recycling of Demolished Concrete and Masonry. Report of Technical Committee 37-DRC, Demolition and Reuse of Concrete, RILEM, Routledge, 1992. Mukai, T. et al. (1979) Study on Reuse of Waste Concrete for Aggregate of Concrete. Proc. Energy and Resources Conservation in Concrete Technology, Japan-US Cooperative Science Programme, San Francisco, US. Rashwan, M.S. and Abourizk, S. (1997) The Properties of Recycled Concrete, Concrete International, ACI, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 58-60. Salem, R.M., Burdette, E.G.SGand Jackson, N.M. (2003) Resistance to Freezing and Thawing of Recycled Aggregate Concrete. ACI Materials Journal, ACI, Vol. 100, No. 3, pp. 216-221. ( :2005.8.12/ :2005.10.20/ :2005.11.17) 218