75 ( ) ( ) *. ** 1, hspark9233@gmail.com ***, visionofsea@hotmail.com
76 :,,,,,,, 1987 6.29... 1993.. 1997. (IMF)..,
77...,,......,..,.....??.
78?.. (conventional wisdom),,.,,,...... 2014.,,...
79 (Sigal, 1973;, 2008 ). (Ronneberger) (mutual relationship). (, 2003, ).., (O'Heffernan, 1994) ' (mutual exploitation model)'..,, (Turk, 1986)..,.., (Schudson, 1991;, 201,1 ),, (Glasgow University Media Group, 1985).. (Althusser, 1971). (propaganda model),
80.,. (Altschull, 1984). (2000). (2000),,...,,.,,., (, 2013)..,.
81. (origin stage), (mediation&lification), (organization). (, 2004)....,.,.,,., (, 2010;, 2006;, 2006)..
82 (presupposition) (world view) (position). (core values), (slogan) (symbol) (,2007;,2003)....,..,,, (life cycle) (, 2013)., (2003).,, 1990,.,,., (, 1994;, 2003).,,,, (, 2003;, 2003;, 2004)..
83,,, (, 2007)... (policy discourse), (business discourse), (research discourse),, (special discourse), (public discourse), (mass discourse). (media discourse),,.,..,, (, 2007). (van Dijk).,,.,,, (, 2006, ).,.
84., (2006) (Labov),, -, (Bell). (2011) (Norman Fairclough & Wodak, 1997).,..,,. 5.,....
85.. ()., 2002 22.. 1 5,000...,.,. PD
86,,., () (). 2012 7. 2007 10 3, 12 3, 2011 12 1 5,000..,.
87 사건 ( 공식입장발표일 ) -- (2002.06.21) - (2007.09.11) - (2012.07.27) 전국일간지 경향국민동아문화서울세계조선한겨레한국 합계 11 19 18 21 11 16 22 18 15 151 14 23 24 18 25 19 23 16 25 187 13 15 16 12 11 14 10 13 18 122 ( ) 38 57 58 51 47 49 55 47 58 460 ( 건 ),,.,.,,. (www.kinds.or.kr).,,,,,,. 9 (,,,,,,,, )
88 460... [ 연구아젠다 ] 언론은대통령친인척 측근비리사건을 사건생애주기 (Event Life Cycle) 에따라어떻게재구성하고있는가? [ 연구문제 1] 언론은대통령친인척 측근비리사건의태동기에사건을어떻게재구성하고있는가? [ 연구문제 2] 언론은대통령친인척 측근비리사건의성장기에사건을어떻게재구성하고있는가? [ 연구문제 3] 언론은대통령친인척 측근비리사건의성숙기에사건을어떻게재구성하고있는가? [ 연구문제 4] 언론은대통령친인척 측근비리사건의쇠퇴기에사건을어떻게재구성하고있는가? (contents analysis). (Event Life Cycle),. 2
89.,.. 3.,,,. [ 1] 2.. < 2>.. - -.,. -,
90 정권별대통령측근 친인척비리사건 김홍일게이트 변양균 - 신정아스캔들이상득저축은행비리...,.. < 2>... < 2-1>.
91 정권별대통령측근 친인척비리사건 김홍일게이트 변양균 - 신정아스캔들이상득저축은행비리. (), 3,,,.
92, (,2002.05.21) (,2002.05.21), (, 2002.05.19).,. (2002.05.22), (2002.05.22)., (2002.05.30), (2002.05.30) (, 2002.05.22)., (, 2002.05.25) (, 2002.05.23) (, 2002.05.25). - (, 2007.08.25), (, 2007.08.25). (, 2007.08.25), (, 2007.08.24).,
93., (, 2012.07.04),. (, 2012.07.04).(, 2012.07.04), (, 2012.06.30).. [ 2],. < 3>. 정권별대통령측근 친인척비리사건 김홍일게이트 변양균 -신정아스캔들이상득저축은행비리 -..
94.,. -. PD.,.,...... < 3-1>.., () - -.
95 정권별대통령측근 친인척비리사건 김홍일게이트 변양균 - 신정아스캔들이상득저축은행비리, 2... 5 (),,,,. (, 2002.06.18), (, 2002.06.05)
96. (, 2002.06.05) (, 2002.06.18). -.,, (, 2007.09.05) (, 2007.09.03)., (, 2007.09.03). (, 2007.09.11)., 5 (, 2012.07.12). (, 2012.07.12) ( ) (, 2012.07.13).,. (, 2012.07.12), ()(, 2012.07.13). (, 2012.07.14) (, 2012.07.15).
97... < 4>. 정권별대통령측근 친인척비리사건 김홍일게이트 변양균 -신정아스캔들 이상득저축은행비리.,...., 6,. -
98.,.,..,,.. < 4-1>,. ( ). (2002.06.28), (2002.06.28). (2002.06.21) (2002.06.23).. (, 2002.07.01) (, 2002.06.22.).
99 정권별대통령측근 친인척비리사건 김홍일게이트 변양균 - 신정아스캔들이상득저축은행비리......,
100.. (2002.06.23). (, 2002.06.27) (, 2002.06.27), (, 2002.06.22).,.,,,..... (2012.07.28).
101... < 5>. 정권별대통령측근 친인척비리사건 김홍일게이트 변양균 - 신정아스캔들이상득저축은행비리,, ()......
102..,.... < 5-1>. 정권별대통령측근 친인척비리사건 김홍일게이트 변양균 - 신정아스캔들이상득저축은행비리.,, 5.
103.,,... 5..,... (, 2002.07.19) (, 2002.07.10).. (2002.07.10) (, 2002.07.13). (, 2002.07.16).. -
104. (, 2007.09.29), (, 2007.09.22)., (, 2007.10.01) (, 2007.09.29). (, 2007.09.25) (, 2007.09.29).,, (, 2007.09.29). (,, ) (,,,, ). (, 2012.08.14) (, 2012.08.14).
105....,...,,.,..
106.,,..,.,...... 9..
107.,... (Semiotic Network Analysis).,. (1994).,, 3, 92~131. (1997).,, 31, 123~159. (2007). :. 3 1, 156~196. (2003).,, 58, 41~69.
108 (2013). :,, 21 3, 64~106. (2013). :,,, 13 3, 75~122. (2007). :., 15 4, 39~85. (2009). : 2008., 9 4, 98~134. (2010). : 2008 9,, 50, 164~186. (2011). : 24,, 56, 86~116. (2000)., : (2005). PR :,,,, 1 1, 296~331. (2004). :,, 2004 3, 58~103. (2006). :< >,, 33, 115~167. (2009). : (SNA),
109, 2009 12, 483~503. (2003). :,, 6 2, 55~89. (2000). :., 27, 48~81. (2007). :,,,,, 51 6, 62~90 (2006).., 14 3, 106~145. (2003).., 11 2, 72~110. (2003).. ECO, 4, 46~93. (2003). -,, 26 2, 83~112. (2006). -,, 11, 19~41. (2003). :., 3 3, 95~132 (2005).,., 4 2. 49~80. (2008)., :,, 2008 10, 164~191. (2011). : 1948-2008., 11 3, 349~380. (1996).., 11, 6~33 (2003). :,, 42, 237~254.
110 Timothy, E. (1998). Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago and London: London of Chicago Press Entman, R.M. (1991). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51~58 Fariclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis, in Teun A. Van Dijk(Ed.) Discourse As Social Interaction, London, Sage. O Heffernan (1994). A Mutual Exploitation Model of Media Influence in U.S Foreign policy. University of Chicago Press. 231~249. Tuchmas, G. (1978). Making News: A Study ing the Construction of Reality, NewYork: the Free Press, (pp.19~20) (1995),, :. Turk, Judy Vanslyke (1986). Public Relation's Influence on the News. Newspaper Research Journal, 7(4). pp.15~27. 2014 04 10 2014 05 23 2014 06 02
111 : Media's discursive patterns in dealing with political scandals
112