PubMed Journal Selection Process - PMC 를중심으로 박진영 서울대학교의학도서관한국메들라스센터 U.S National Library of Medicine s International Partner Library & DOCLINE user group
1. PubMed 컨텐츠현황 2. 국내의학학술지 PubMed 등재현황 3. MEDLINE & PMC 저널심사과정및심사기준 4. MEDLINE & PMC 저널선정후 NLM 관리정책 5. 시사점 참고문헌 2 목차
PubMed Content ~2% Books Book, Chapter, 정부가이드라인등보고서에수록된서지목록 PMC NLM 이만든 Open Access Repository MEDLINE 87% NLM 저널선정위원회 (LSTRC*) 에서선정된저널의수록서지목록 MeSH, Funding, Genetic, Chemical and other metadata 제공 17% * LSTRC, Literature Selection Technical Review Committee (Source: Data from PubMed, 2019. 5.28) 3 1. PubMed 컨텐츠현황
PMC Content 1,371,501 25% Journal & Publisher Program Deposit - PMC 선정저널의전체원문 Full text 저장 Author Manuscript Deposit 671,061 12% 5,536,580 (Source: PMC overview, 2019. 5.31, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/intro/) 3,494,018 63% - 정부기관및특정연구단체의펀딩을받은논문의 Author manuscript 저장 Digitization Projects - 2014 년부터역사적으로중요하다고판단되는의생명과학저널의백이슈및고아저작물 *(Orphan Works) 을디지털작업하여저장 * 저작권자를알수없는저작물 4 1. PubMed 컨텐츠현황
국내의학학술지 PubMed 등재현황 국내보건의학학술지 : 261 종 ( 대한의학학술지편집인협의회기준, 2018.7 월 ) PubMed 등재학술지 : 130 종 (2019 년 5 월현재 ) MEDLINE 등재 31 종 MEDLINE 9 종 MEDLINE & PMC 22 종 PMC 99 종 PMC 등재 121 종 (Source: Data from Journals in NCBI Databases, 2019. 5.28) 5 2. 국내의학학술지 PubMed 등재현황
PubMed 등재저널수 연도별등재현황 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 PMC 1 7 17 15 20 15 13 2 4 4 1 MEDLINE 1 0 3 4 6 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 1 3 2 2 0 2 1 합계 99 31 6 2. 국내의학학술지 PubMed 등재현황
왜 PubMed 에등재해야하는가? 국내학술지의경우국내저자의논문만으로는생존불가, 국제화필수 PMC에등재후 PubMed에서쉽게검색누구나쉽게온라인에서읽고활용가능하므로학술지이용증가국제적노출증가로전세계학술지시장에서리더쉽증대국내의학학술지발전의지표로평가및활용 7 2. 국내의학학술지 PubMed 등재현황
왜등재하기어려운가? 오직내용의과학성과학술지편집수준만심사 ( 인용지수평가 X) PMC 등재심사위원제도입 MEDLINE 선정수준의까다로운평가 최근국내학술지등재탈락율 : 80% 이상 국내영문미등재학회지약 30 종에대한정부지원책강구 Table 1. MEDLINE Selection Statistics. From MEDLINE Selection Statistics; 2019 [cited 2019 May 31]. Available form; https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/lstrc/stats.html [5] Fiscal Year Reviewed Recommended LSTRC 심사통과율 FY 2018 470 52 11% FY 2017 428 62 14% FY 2016 394 55 14% FY 2015 518 75 14% FY 2014 493 59 12% FY 2013 517 67 13% FY 2012 559 93 17% 8 2. 국내의학학술지 PubMed 등재현황
MEDLINE 및 PMC 저널심사과정 Figure 1. NLM Journal Selection for MEDLINE & PMC. From MEDLINE, PMC Journals, Author Manuscripts, Oh My!: Understanding what Content is in PubMed Available form; https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/disted/video/mla_2018/selection.html [3] 9 3. MEDLINE & PMC 저널심사과정및심사기준
1 단계. MEDLINE & PMC 등재필수요건심사 Step 2. Initial application screening Table 2. MEDLINE vs. PMC. From MEDLINE, PMC Journals, Author Manuscripts, Oh My!: Understanding what Content is in PubMed Available form; https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/disted/video/mla_2018/selection.html [3] MEDLINE PMC 출판사필수요건 XML 형태로서지와초록 Deposit English language abstracts for non-english articles ISSN, e-issn 분리 40 peer-reviewed articles XML 형태로원문전체를 Deposit Articles in English ISSN 25 peer-reviewed articles 심사위원단 Literature Selection Technical Review Committee (LSTRC) 외부컨설턴트 Scientists (Ph.D. or M.D. level researchers and physicians) & medical librarians 심사위원회설립 1987 2014 심사횟수연간 3 회상시 (12 주이내결과통보 ) 10 3. MEDLINE & PMC 저널심사과정및심사기준
2 단계. NLM 수서정책적합성심사 Step 3. Review by Collection staff to ensure journal is in scope for NLM 1. Journal Type 2. Journal Scope Original research journals Clinical practice journals Review journals Clinical case reports Data journals 아티클의약 20% 이상이 NLM 수서정책기준의 biomedical and life science 주제범위안에있어야함 Kathryn Funk, PMC program manager, NLM First of all, it s important to bear in mind that the scope of what NLM collects is biomedical and life science content. I always recommend that journals familiarize themselves with the scope of the library s collection before applying for either MEDLINE or PMC because we do see a lot of submissions that are outside of the scope for the databases, said Funk. 11 3. MEDLINE & PMC 저널심사과정및심사기준
3 단계. 과학성심사 학회지탈락사유 Step 4. Journal review by external committee /consultants 학술지정책과편집수준평가 1 2 3 Article selection 기준, peer-review process, 연구출판윤리에관한정보유무확인 저자에대한 financial conflicts of interest 서약서 상업적후원기관이있는경우, 컨텐츠전반의객관성에영향을미치지않는지확인 - Aims and Scope 를기술하고잘지키는가? - Peer review 과정이명백하고자세한가? - 심사방법과 single blind, double blind 여부를기술하였는가? - 편집위원투고원고처리정책을기술하였는가? - 심사자는 2 명이상인가? - 투고부터발행 (e-pub 포함 ) 까지 6 개월미만인가? - 연구출판윤리를명확히기술하고잘지키는가? - Advertising policies 를기술하였는가? - 사람대상연구에서 Institutional Review Board (IRB), informed consent 를기술하는가? - 동물실험에서동물윤리위원회허락을받는가? - 중복출판점검을하는가? - 상업적스폰서를명확하게기술하였는가? 12 3. MEDLINE & PMC 저널심사과정및심사기준
3 단계. 과학성심사 Step 4. Journal review by external committee /consultants 논문의과학성입증요소평가 1 연구목적및근거가명확한가? 2 실험을재현할수있는상세한방법론이진술되었나? 3 Discussion 은비평적이고확고하며, 포괄적으로진술되었나? 4 결론은데이터에의해주장되었는가? 학회지탈락사유 - 연구수행의근거와당위성이있는가? - 논문에가설설정을하는가? - 조사설문과디자인의타당도를확인하는가? - 통계분석을정확히하는가? - 통계편집인이있는가? - 연구디자인이견실하고목적달성에적절한가? - 고찰부분이확고한논리에바탕을두고포괄적인가? - 논문기술은참고문헌에서적절하게뒷받침하고있는가? 5 레퍼런스가일관성있게인용되었고, 최신정보인가? 13 3. MEDLINE & PMC 저널심사과정및심사기준
3 단계. 과학성심사 Step 4. Journal review by external committee /consultants 국내학술지업무지침부실항목예시 출판사의업무지침 (Best Practice) 심사 - 의학학술지에게재되는학술저작물의생산, 보고, 편집및출판에대한권고안 (Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals from ICMJE.) http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf - 학술지출판투명성원칙과처리기준 (Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing (joint statement by COPE, DOAJ, WAME, and OASPA) http://doaj.org/bestpractice - 독자가누구인지기술 - Single blind, double blind, open review, editorial review 등기술 - 소유권을명확하게기술 - 운영팀을세세하게기술 - 편집, 심사, 내용에대한이의신청및처리방법기술 - 자료공유정책유무, 재현성구현기술 - 지적재산권은누가갖는지기술 - 출판후논문내용토의하는과정기술 - 학술지폐간후논문이용여부기술 - 출판경비마련에관한내용 - 광고정책및마케팅기술 ( 스팸메일사용방법제외 ) 14 3. MEDLINE & PMC 저널심사과정및심사기준
3 단계. 과학성심사 Table 3. Literature Selection Technical Review Committee: Journal Review Summary From Huh S. Endocinol Metab 2017;32:60 [2] 학술지심사표 - 4.0 이상통과 - 국내학회지는 3.0-3.5 수준으로탈락함 Step 4. Journal review by external committee /consultants 15 3. MEDLINE & PMC 저널심사과정및심사기준
NLM 모니터링 - NLM publisher review working group - PubMed 의품질향상을위해현재등재된 PMC, MEDLINE 저널을검토함 - new to NLM, 출판사활동의변화감지, 출판사발행저널들의전체적인품질우려가감지되는경우검토함 - 심사당시의출판지침을위반할경우, Indexing 중단, 3 년간등재신청불가 등재저널의개별아티클미평가 - 의견, 수정, 철회등문제발생시이를해결할수있는해당출판사프로세스신뢰 - PubMed, PMC 에등재된개별논문에대한평가는연구저자와독자의몫 16 4. MEDLINE & PMC 저널선정후 NLM 관리정책
의학도서관은국내학술지의 PubMed 등재를위한연구자들의활동을지원할수있어야함 - 투고논문의신뢰성확보를위한도서관사서검증서비스필요 - 학술논문의기본적인지침을교육하는도서관서비스개발 (ex. 표와그림의주석달기, 참고문헌작성, 통계분석의기술등 ) 의학사서는 PubMed 등재를위한학술지필수요소및심사기준을이해하고연구자들에게학술지발행및작성에대한조언가능 PMC 저널심사과정에의학사서가적극참여하는것과같이국내색인 DB 등재 (KoreaMed 등 ) 심사과정에의학사서의적극적참여필요 17 5. 시사점
[Article] 1. 허선, 우리나라의학학술지최근약진과발전방향 : 우리나라학술지논문으로노벨생리의학상을수상할수있을까?. J Korean Med Assoc 2018;61:524-531. 2. Huh S. How to prepare endocrinology and metabolism for reapplication to MEDLINE. Endocinol Metab 2017;32:58-61. [ 웹사이트 ] 3. NLM Theater Presentations at the 2018 Medical Library Association Conference. MEDLINE, PMC Journals, Author Manuscripts, Oh My!: Understanding what Content is in PubMed; 2018 [cited 2019 May 20]. Available form; https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/disted/video/mla_2018/selection.html 4. NLM Collection Development Manual. Journals; 2017 [cited 2019 May 31]. Available form; https://www.nlm.nih.gov/tsd/acquisitions/cdm/formats29.html 5. MEDLINE Selection Statistics; 2019 [cited 2019 May 31]. Available form; https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/lstrc/stats.html 6. Xmlink. PMC Journals; 2019 [cited 2019 May 31]. Available form; https://xmlink.kr/journals_pmc.php. 7. Collection Development Manual of the National Library of Medicine; 2004 [cited 2019 May 31]. Available form; https://www.nlm.nih.gov/tsd/acquisitions/cdm/cdmbooksubjecttoc.html [ 단행본 ] 8. 허선. Check lists for society journal editors to add their journals to indexing databases. 1st ed. Seoul:XMLARCHIVE, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5082/checklist.2019.3.21 18 참고문헌