Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research"

준기 이
5 years ago
Views:

1 Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research Trends on Curriculum for Students with Severe and multiple disabilities in Korea Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze current for ten years research Trends of curriculum for students with severe and multiple disabilities in Korea. Through this study, we suggested tasks and direction of future research and base data for effective curriculum development of students with severe and multiple disabilities. Method: For we reviewed, 25 papers published in domestic professional journals over the past 10 years from 2007 to The results of the study were as follows. Results: First, the trends of curriculum for students with severe and multiple disabilities were analyzed quantitatively according to four variables: publication year, research method, research area, and redundancy type. Second, the qualitative analysis of the study on the curriculum for students with severe and multiple disabilities showed that five main categories: The basic curriculum organization and operation, the direction and teaching method of subject matter education, the theory and model of curriculum, review of overseas curriculum, the others. Conclusion: Based on the above results, we searched major issues in the curriculum for students with severe and multiple disabilities and suggested the direction of follow up study. Key words : severe and multiple disabilities, curriculum, research trends * Corresponding Author: Kim, Hye-Ri. Joongbu University, Dept. of Secondary Special Education, 305, Dongheon-ro, Deogyang-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do , Korea, miss1117@joongbu.ac.kr

2 (Snell & Brown, 2006).,, (, 2010). (, 2011;,, 2013;, 2011;, 2011). (, 2012). 2012,,,,, (, 2015).,, (, 2011).,, (, 2012)., (,, 2013).,

3 (Stodden, Galloway, & Stodden, 2003),.,, 100% (,,,, 2013)., (, 2011)., -,, - (,,,, 2013).,,,,,, (,, 2015). (,, 2015).,, -.,, -, (,, 2015).,

4 (, 2010)., , (2015).,,.. 10,..,?,?. KERIS( ), KISS( ), DBpia( ), ,,,,,,, -, 30 1, 25..

5 , 10. (,, 2015;,, 2011;,,, 2015;,, 2012) 10, ,., 10.,,,,,,,, -, 1.,.,.,,, IEP,, -,,.,,,, 4 %. (,, 2011;,, 2009;,,, 2015;,, 2012), (2006).,,, 4,,,,,, 6,,,

6 , 4.,. Strauss Corbin(1998),,, (, 2012).,.,,,, 5., ( / + ) 100, 97%. 2., (,,,, ), 4..,,,,.

7 .,,, 4. 1) 논문게재연도 % (20.0%), ) 연구방법 % (44.0%), (28.0%), (24.0%).

8 . 7,. 3) 연구영역 % (48.0%),.. 4) 중복장애유형 % , 17 (68.0%), 5 (20.0%), 2 (8.0%), 1 (4.0%).,

9 ,,,, (,,, IEP ) 5. 1) 기본교육과정편성 운영 2012, (, 2014)., 50%, (,, 2013)., 2012., (, 2014). (, 2013)., (,,, 2013), (, 2011). (, 2011)., 100%

10 (,,,, 2013)., (2015),,., (2010),,,,. - (,,,, 2013)., (,, 2013;, 2011), (,, 2015)., -,,, (,, 2015).,,, (, 2013).,,, -., (, 2011).

11 2) 교과교육의방향성및교수방법 (, 2013). 50%, (, 2012)., (,, 2012).,, (,, 2015).,, (,, 2012)., (, 2011), (, 2012).,, - (,, 2012).,

12 (, 2013). (2012) -., (2012) ICT,.,. (, 2014). (2010) Dewey.,, 3,. 3) 교육과정이론및모형,, (, 2010). (2010),., (2011),,,

13 ,., (,, 2011). (2015) - (Merleau-Ponty),,,,,,,,,,,,. 4) 국외교육과정분석 (2011),,,,,,.,, (2013),,. 5) 기타 ( 통합교육을위한일반교육과정접근, 학교수준교육과정편성운영방안, 교육과정재구성, IEP 연계방안등 ) 51,,

14 , (,, 2016).,, (,, 2016).,, (,, 2011)., (,, 2013).,, (, 2014). (,, 2013)., (,, 2016).,, IEP, IEP IEP

15 (,, 2016)., (, 2011).. 10,.., , , 2008 (, 2011;,, 2011;, 2011;, 2011;, 2011)., 2012, 2013, ,,,,.

16 , (2015),, ( ),,..,.,,,,., (2015). (2010),.,,.,,.,,.., (,, 2013;, 2011).,

17 , (,, 2015).,, 2012,,., 2012 (2014) 2012,,,.,, (2013) %,., (2015),.. - (,, 2015).

18 (, 2013), (,,,, 2016). 100% (,,,, 2013),,.,, (, 2011;,, 2015;,, 2015;, 2011;, 2013;, 2011)., (,,, 2013). Agran, Alper, & Wehmeyer(2002),., (, 2015). (2014),. (2009),. (2014)

19 ,.,.,,. Alquraini(2012).,, (2012) -, -.,, (,, 2016). -,., (,, 2012),, (,, 2012). (, 2012). (, 2015).,,,,.

20 ,,.,,. (2015).,,. (,,, 2013),..,,,,, IEP.,.,, (,, 2017).,., (2016) 51,,.

21 ,. (*). * (2009). 2008,. (1), * (2011).. (3), (2012).. *, (2011).. (3), *, (2015).. (4), ,,, (2016).. (3), (2012).., *,,, (2013).. (1), *, (2015).. (1), *, (2013) (2), * (2010).. (4), * (2011).. (3), * (2015)..

22 (4), 1-22., (2017).. (1), * (2011).. (2), *, (2016). :. (3), , (2011). : (4), *,, (2007).. (2), (2012)..., (2009).. (4), * (2010).. (2), , (2006). :. *, (2016).. (4), * (2014).. (3), ,, (2015). : (1), *, (2012).. (1), * (2010).. (1), * (2012).. (3), * (2013).. (1), * (2014)..

23 (3), *,, (2013).. (2), (2011).. (4), *, (2012).. (2), *, (2013).. (2), , (2012). : (4), , (2012). :. (1), (2013).. (3), * (2011) (1), Agran, M., Alper, S., & Wehmeyer, M. (2002). Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means to teachers. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, Alquraini, A. T. (2012). Factors related to teachers attitudes towards the inclusive education of students with severe intellectual disabilities in Riyadh, Saudi. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(3), Snell, M. E., & Brown, E. (2006). Instruction of students with severe disabilities(6th ed). Pearson Merill: Prentice Hall. Stodden, R. A., Galloway, L. M., & Stodden, N. J. (2003). Secondary school curricula issues: Impact on postsecondary students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70, Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedure for developing Grounded theory(2nd ed). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications. Inc.. : / : / :

24 : 10,. : ,. :,,,, 4.,,,,, 5. :.

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.335-363 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.26.3.201612.335 Awareness, Supports in Need, and Actual Situation on the Curriculum Reconstruction