,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download ",,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;"

길호 탄
5 years ago
Views:

1 ,,.. 400,,,,,,.,,, -, -, -., 3.. :, Tel : , sunney05@hanmail.net

2 ,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006; Adelman, Taylor, & Nelson, 1989),., (2012),.,..,

3 . (Diener, 2000),., (,, 2012;,,, 2001;, 2005;, 2006;, 2011;, 2010) (Parsons, 1999),,.,,,,,,.,.,,,,,.,,,.,,, (, 2010). (, 2010).. (, 2007).,,.

4 (,, 2012). 30% (, 2013)... (,, 2010)..,,.. (, 2010).,., (2011),. (2013),. (2012), 20 30, 40,.,. 4,,,. 1.? (Berry, 1997),,,,

5 2 (, 2008;, 2007;,, 2010).,, (, 2006;,, 2007;, 2009)..,.. (2008),,, (2012).,,.,.,. (subjective well-being). (Diener, 2000). Ryff(1989) (, 2001). Ryff(1989) 6 (psychological well-being). 6 (self acceptance), (positive relations with others),

6 (autonomy), (environmental mastery), (purpose in life), (personal growth) (, 2001).,,,, (, 2009;, 2010). (2009).,,,,,, (, 2006;, 2005).,,,. (Hobfoll, 2002)... (empowerment).,. Bandura(1977)... (, 2005;, 2010)., (2011).,,,.,,.. (,, 2008).

7 . (,, 2009:,,, 2006).,, (2006). (2007).,, (2012)..,,,..,,,,,,,, (,,, 2011;, 2006; Adelman, Taylor, & Nelson, 1989).,, (2012),,,.,., (2009)., (,, 2008).,,

8 , , 369. (Positive Affectivity and Negative Affectivity Schedule: PANAS) (2003)., (Cronbach'α).90. Ryff(1989) (Psychological Well-being Scale: PWBS) (2001). PWBS 6 46 Likert 6 (2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 33, 34, 36, 40, 41, 45, 46). 6 -,,,,,. (Cronbach'α).84. Rogers (1997), (2001). 4 8(7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 18, 23), 6(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), - 5(10, 11, 15, 16, 17), - 4 (19, 20, 21, 22) Diener (1984) (1999) (Satisfaction with life scale: SWLS). 5, SPSS WIN 18.0 AMOS

9 ,,,,,,,.,,, -, / -, / / -. < 1> N % N % ~ ~ ~

10 .,,,. (F=15.35, p=.001), (F=7.89, p=.001), (F=3.02, p=.018) , 4-6, 7-10, 11..,,. * p<.05, *** p<.001 (SD) F (0.86)a 3.25(0.93)b 3.42(0.91)b 2.38(0.80)a (0.89)b (0.95)b (0.88)c (0.93)c 2.93(0.68)a 3.34(0.82)b 3.22(0.95)b 2.83(1.06)a 3.00(0.54)a 3.10(0.78) 3.05(0.83) 3.24(0.94) 3.06(1.02) 2.63(0.72) *** *** *

11 . 4,. (F=15.47, p=.001), (F=6.58, p=.001), (F=7.25, p=.001), (F=3.12, p=.015) , 11.,,,,,, * p<.05, *** p<.001 (SD) F (0.77)a 2.84(0.82)b 2.70(0.81)b 3.32(0.52)a (0.80)ab (0.82)ab (0.85)ab (0.81)c 3.26(0.47)a 2.75(0.74)b 2.82(0.84)b 3.38(0.86)a 3.34(0.79)a 3.14(0.58)a 3.11(0.75)a 2.81(0.83)b 3.09(0.88)a 3.47(0.67)c *** *** *** *

12 .,,,. (F=4.76, p=.009), (F=3.43, p=.009), (F=7.12, p=.001), (F=6.13, p=.001) , 7.,,,.,. ** p<.01, *** p<.001 (SD) F (0.31)a 2.18(0.28)b 2.14(0.23)b 2.35(0.38)a (0.29)ab (0.30)ab (0.26)b (0.25)b 2.28(0.30)a 2.13(0.28)b 2.17(0.26)b 2.29(0.26)a 2.66(0.55)c 2.15(0.33)a 2.25(0.29)b 2.15(0.27)a 2.24(0.27)b 2.58(0.44)c ** ** *** ***

13 ,,.,? 1.,,,, (multicollinearity),,,., VIF(: 9.409, ; 9.163, : 4.857).10.,,,.7~8,.,,, ** ** ** **.720 **.738 **.692 **.772 ** ** p<.01 (β=52, t=2.29, p=.036) (β=15, t=.77, p=.046).., AMOS., χ 2 5 NF(Normed Fit Index)I, TLI(Tucker-Lewis Imdex) 8, RMSEA(Root Mean Square Error of Approximation) 1.,,,,,. B β t * *.77 Adj R 2.84 * p<.05, *** p<.001 F ***

14 ? 1..,..,,,.,,.,..,,.,,.,,.,,

15 .,,.,,,.,,,,,, (, 2007;, 2011;,, 2007;, 2009)..,..,.,,, AMOS., -, -, -...,.,.

16 (, 2010),.,, (, 1998)...,. (, 2007). (,,, 2006;, 2009),, (,, 2010;,, 2007;, 2006;, 2010)....,,....,.,,

17 ..,,,, (2013)... (2009)... (2008). 2008, (2012).. (1), (2006)... (2005)..., (2010).. (2), (2009).., (2001). :. (2), (2005). : (2010).. (2), (2010).

18 .. (2010).., (2006).. (3), (2010)... (2001)...,, (2006)... (2011).,. (2), (2010).. (2008).., (2007).. (2011) , (2010).. (2), (2005).,. (2007)... (2011).,,,. (2), (2007) (2011).. (2), (2010).., (2007) (2009).. (4), (2012).. (1), , (2012)., (2) (2012)..

19 (2), (1998)...,,,, (2009). : (2010)... (2008) (2010).,. (3), (2009)... (2005).. (2012)... (2003).. (4), (2010).. (4), (2011).. ( ).. 1. available: (2007)... (2012).. (2), (2012). :. (1), (1999) (2006). : (2006). --. (5), , (2011).. (9), (2013). < >. :. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 84(2) Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of haooiness, and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55,

20 Hobfoll, S, E. (2002). Social and psychological resource and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6, Parsons R. J. (1999). Empowerment pratice in social work. Canadian Scholars' Press Inc. Rogers, E. S., Chamberlin, J., Elloson, M. L., & Cream, T. (1997). A consumer constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 48(8), Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it?: Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), : : :

21 Influence on the Life Satisfaction of the Negative Emotions, Psychological Well-being and Empowerment of Mothers from Multicultural Families Oh, Ok Sun Dept. of Education, JeJu National Univ. Lecturer This study was designed to look into whether there is any mediated effect of psychological well-being and empowerment on the path of the negative emotions of mothers from multi-cultural families turning into the life satisfaction and tried to demonstrate empirically factors to mitigate the decline in the life satisfaction due to negative emotions of mothers from multi-cultural families. In addition, we verified the differences of psychological factors according to the characteristics of the sociology of population of mothers from multi-cultural families. For this, the survey was conducted with 400 mothers from multi-cultural families across the nation. The results are as follows. First, in case of negative emotions, there were differences among groups depending on ages, years of marriage and educational background. In case of psychological well-being and empowerment, there were differences among groups with different age, years of marriage, their own or their spouse's educational background. Second, as a result of looking into the path through which negative emotions turned into life satisfaction, there were the path effects between negative emotions and empowerment, between negative emotions and life satisfaction, and between psychological well-being and life satisfaction. This means that dealing properly with negative emotions can have positive impacts on the three dimensions of psychological well-being, empowerment, and eventually the life satisfaction. This study is meaningful in that it took psychological factors of mothers from multi-cultural families into consideration and the results can be used as useful data to come up with political measures for mothers from multi-cultural families in the future. Key words : mothers from multi-cultural families, negative emotions, psychological well-being, empowerment, life satisfaction

,......

,...... The Impact of Personal Traits, Family Characteristics, and Job Satisfaction on the Psychological Well-Being of Middle Aged Men from the Baby Boomer Generation Working in Large Corporations Department of