0724민컴-임상종양내지최종.ps, page Normalize

Similar documents
( )Jkstro011.hwp

김범수

황지웅

연하곤란

지원연구분야 ( 코드 ) LC0202 과제번호 창의과제프로그램공개가능여부과제성격 ( 기초, 응용, 개발 ) 응용실용화대상여부실용화공개 ( 공개, 비공개 ) ( 국문 ) 연구과제명 과제책임자 세부과제 ( 영문 ) 구분 소속위암연구과직위책임연구원

노영남

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy

001-학회지소개(영)

기관고유연구사업결과보고

레이아웃 1

Table 1. Distribution by site and stage of laryngeal cancer Supraglottic Glottic Transglottic Total Stage Total 20

A 617

hwp

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

Kjhps016( ).hwp

Lumbar spine

untitled


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

00약제부봄호c03逞풚

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

노인정신의학회보14-1호

<342EBEC8BCBABFAD2CB9DAC7E2C1D82E687770>

歯1.PDF

(

12이문규

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

1..

???? 1

304.fm

569_581_특집- 정승용

Treatment and Role of Hormaonal Replaement Therapy

( )Jksc057.hwp

보건사회연구-25일수정

012임수진

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>

조기 위암 집담회 부산대학교 병원 CASE

11¹Ú´ö±Ô

Kbcs002.hwp

내시경 conference

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

대한한의학원전학회지26권4호-교정본(1125).hwp

Pharmacotherapeutics Application of New Pathogenesis on the Drug Treatment of Diabetes Young Seol Kim, M.D. Department of Endocrinology Kyung Hee Univ

May 10~ Hotel Inter-Burgo Exco, Daegu Plenary lectures From metabolic syndrome to diabetes Meta-inflammation responsible for the progression fr

untitled

, ( ) 1) *.. I. (batch). (production planning). (downstream stage) (stockout).... (endangered). (utilization). *

Rheu-suppl hwp


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

388 The Korean Journal of Hepatology : Vol. 6. No COMMENT 1. (dysplastic nodule) (adenomatous hyperplasia, AH), (macroregenerative nodule, MR

원위부요척골관절질환에서의초음파 유도하스테로이드주사치료의효과 - 후향적 1 년경과관찰연구 - 연세대학교대학원 의학과 남상현


16(1)-3(국문)(p.40-45).fm

½Éº´È¿ Ãâ·Â

<BFACB1B85F D30335FB0E6C1A6C0DAC0AFB1B8BFAA2E687770>

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

Can032.hwp

< FC1F8B9E6B1B3C0B02E687770>


( )Jkstro027.hwp

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

44-4대지.07이영희532~

04±èºÎ¼º

03이경미(237~248)ok

서론 34 2

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

09김정식.PDF

20, 41..,..,.,.,....,.,, (relevant).,.,..??.,

139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ

590호(01-11)

untitled

대한한의학원전학회지24권6호-전체최종.hwp

<C1A63534C8B820BCBCB9CCB3AA2DC6EDC1FD2E687770>

12È«±â¼±¿Ü339~370

07_Àü¼ºÅÂ_0922

인문사회과학기술융합학회

120304강신용

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

페링야간뇨소책자-내지-16

Jkbcs016(92-97).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend


untitled

<303720C7CFC1A4BCF86F6B2E687770>

1. KT 올레스퀘어 미디어파사드 콘텐츠 개발.hwp


1. 서론 1-1 연구 배경과 목적 1-2 연구 방법과 범위 2. 클라우드 게임 서비스 2-1 클라우드 게임 서비스의 정의 2-2 클라우드 게임 서비스의 특징 2-3 클라우드 게임 서비스의 시장 현황 2-4 클라우드 게임 서비스 사례 연구 2-5 클라우드 게임 서비스에

<3133B1C732C8A328BCF6C1A4292E687770>



untitled

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

<BFA9BAD02DB0A1BBF3B1A4B0ED28C0CCBCF6B9FC2920B3BBC1F62E706466>

433대지05박창용

<C5EBC0CFB0FA20C6F2C8AD2E687770>

300 구보학보 12집. 1),,.,,, TV,,.,,,,,,..,...,....,... (recall). 2) 1) 양웅, 김충현, 김태원, 광고표현 수사법에 따른 이해와 선호 효과: 브랜드 인지도와 의미고정의 영향을 중심으로, 광고학연구 18권 2호, 2007 여름

종골 부정 유합에 동반된 거주상 관절 아탈구의 치료 (1예 보고) 정복이 안된 상태로 치료 시에는 추후 지속적인 족부 동통의 원인이 되며, 이런 동통으로 인해 종골에 대해 구제술이나 2차적 재건술이 필요할 수도 있다. 2) 경종골 거주상 관절 탈구는 외국 문헌에 증례

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Transcription:

REVIEW ARTICLE Debate and update issues for surgical treatment of mid and lower rectal cancer Professor Department of Surgery Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul, Korea Nam Kyu Kim, M.D. Debate and update issues for surgical treatment of mid and lower rectal cancer 9

Table 1. Selected Series of Local Excision Alone for T1 Rectal Cancers Study Number of patients patients 5-year local recurrence rate(%) 5-year disease free survival rate(%) Chakravartl et al(1999) [7] 52 11 80 Steele et al(1999) [8] 59 7 87 Garcla-Agullar et al(2000) [9] 55 18 77 Paty et al(2002) [10] 45 14 92 Nascimbeni et al(2004) [11] 70 24 76 Madbouly et al(2005) [12] 52 28 71 Endreseth et al(2007) [13] 35 12 64 You et al(2007) [14] 601 8 93 Ptok et al(2007) [15] 105 5 91 10 Nam Kyu Kim

Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology Summer 2012;Vol.8,NO.1: Table 2. Selected Series of Local Excision Alone for T2 Rectal caner Study Number of patients patients 5-year local recurrence rate(%) 5-year disease free survival rate(%) Garcla-Agullar et al(2000) [9] 55 18 77 Paty et al(2002) [10] 45 14 92 Gao et al(2003) [16] 70 24 76 You et al(2007) [15] 601 8 93 Table 3. Results of Retrospective Series Comparing Local Excision with Radical Surgery for T1 Rectal caner Study 5 year local recurrence rate(%) 5 year overall survival rate(%) Median Follow up(years) Local Excision Radical Resection Local Excision Radical Resection Mellgren et al(2000) [18] 18 0 72 80 4.6 Nascimbeni et al(2004) [11] 6.6 2.8 72 90 8.1 Endreseth et al(2005) [13] 12 6 70 80 Range 2-8 Bentrem et al(2005) [17] 15 3 89 93 4.3 You et al(2007) [14] 12.5 6.9 77 82 6.3 Ptok et al(2007) [15] 5.1 1.4 84 92 3.5 Folkesson et al(2007) (Mix of T1 and T2) [19] 7 2 87 93 Not reported Nash et al(2009) [20] 13.2 2.7 87 96 5.6 Debate and update issues for surgical treatment of mid and lower rectal cancer 11

Table 4. Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery versus Radical Surgery for T1 and T2 Rectal cancer TEM Radical resection T stage Local recurrence Overall survival Local recurrence Overall survival Follow-up(months) rate(%) rate(%) rate(%) rate(%) Winde et al(1996) [22] 1 4.2 96 0 96 46 Heintz et al(1998) [23] 1(low risk) 4.4 79 2.9 81 42-52 1(high risk) 33 62 18.2 69 Lee et al(2003) [24] 1 4.1 100 0 93 31-35 2 19.5 95 9.4q 96 De Graaf(2009) [26] 1 24 75 0 77 42-84 Fig. 1. Transanal Endoscopic Operation (TEO) 12 Nam Kyu Kim

Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology Summer 2012;Vol.8,NO.1: Table 5. Transanal excision with adjuvant treatment for rectal cancer Study Number of patients Follow-up(months) 5-year local recurrence rate(%) 5-year disease free survival rate(%) Coco et al(1992) [28] 15 68 6 74 Fortunato et al(1995) [29] 21 56 19 77 Steele et al(1999) [30] 51 48 13.7 85(6 year) Le Voyer et al(1999) [31] 35 46 11.4 91(DFS) Russell et al(2000) [32] 51 73.2 13.7 75(DFS) YUHS et al(2007) [33] 76 84.9 7.9 100(pT1, with RT) 76(pT1, without RT) 75(pT2) Table 6. Outcome of patients with rectal cancer undergoing local excision after achieving pathological T0 following neoadjuvant chemoradiation Study Patients with pt0 Follow up median(range) Local recurrence n(%) Distant recurrence n(%) Schell et al(2002) [35] 8 48(18-105) 0 1(12) Ruo et al(2002) [36] 3 29(2-89) 0 0 Hershman et al(2003) [37] 7 33(3-120) 0 0 Bonnen et al(2004) [38] 14 42(5-109) 0 1 Stipa et al(2004) [39] 7 37(18-118) 0 NR Caricato et al(2006) [40] 3 47 0 0 Borschitz et al(2007) [41] 1 24(12-79) 0 0 Lezoche et al(2008) [42] 11 84(72-96) 0 0 Nair et al(2008) [43] 19 64(6-153) 1(5) 1(5) YUHS et al(2008) [44] 4 91(50-127) 0 1(25) Yulia et al(2010) [34] 14 48(5-123) 0 0 Debate and update issues for surgical treatment of mid and lower rectal cancer 13

Table 7. Oncologic outcomes after ultra low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis Study Follow up median(months) Local recurrence n(%) Distant recurrence n(%) Drake et al(1987) [57] 20 27 5 Cavaliere et al(2002) [58] 62 27 5 Parc et al(2003) [59] 17 17 6 Huguet et al(2004) [60] 20 15 5 Hautefeuille et al(2004) [61] 20 16 5 YUHS et al(2006) [62] 36.3 18.7 5.2 YUHS et al(robotic CAA) (2012) [63] 21.3 16.3 NR 14 Nam Kyu Kim

Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology Summer 2012;Vol.8,NO.1: Table 8. Oncological outcomes following intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Median R0 Local 5-year survival (%) Operative Overall Continence Study n follow-up resection recurrence Overall Disease-free mortality morbidity (mean bowel (months) (%) (%) (%) (%) movements in 24 h) Braun et al(1992) [53] 63 80 100 11 62 NR 6 35 2.2 Bannon et al(1995) [54] 109 40 NR 11 87 NR 1 10 NR Kohler et al(2000) [55] 31 82 100 10 79 NR 0 65 3.3 Rullier et al(2005) [56] 92 40 89 2 81 70 0 27 NR Schiessel et al(2005) [57] 121 94 96.7 5.3 88 NR 0.8 17.1 2.2 Saito et al(2006) [58] 228 41 98.7 5.3 92 83 0.4 24.0 NR Chamlou et al(2007) [59] 90 56 94 7 82 75 0 19 2.3 Akasu et al(2008) [60] 120 42 96.7 6.7 91 77 0.8 33.0 NR Krand et al(2009) [61] 47 68 98 2 85 82 0 38 2.3 Han et al(2009) [62] 40 43 100 11 62 NR 6 35 2.2 Saito et al(2009) [63] 132 40 100 10.6 80 69 0 30.3 NR Weiser et al(2009) [64] 44 47 92 0 96 83 0 39 NR Yamada et al(2009) [65] 107 41 100 2.5 92 87 0 27.0 3.7 Debate and update issues for surgical treatment of mid and lower rectal cancer 15

Fig. 2. Intersphincteric resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation 16 Nam Kyu Kim

Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology Summer 2012;Vol.8,NO.1: REFERENCES 1. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982;69:613-6. 2. Chessin DB, Guillem JG. Surgical issues in rectal cancer: a 2004 update. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2004;4:233-40. 3. Jeong SY, Chessin DB, Guillem JG. Surgical treatment of rectal cancer: radical resection. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2006;15:95-107. 4. Urban M, Rosen HR, Hölbling N, Feil W, Hochwarther G, Hruby W, et al. MR imaging for the preoperative planning of sphinctersaving surgery for tumors of the lower third of the rectum: use of intravenous and endorectal contrast materials. Radiology 2000;214:503-8. 5. Rullier E, Sebag-Montefiore D. Sphincter saving is the primary objective for local treatment of cancer of the lower rectum. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:775-7. 6. NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) Guidelines Version 3,2012 Rectal cancer. 7. Chakravarti A, Compton CC, Shellito PC, et al. Long-term followup of patients with rectal cancer managed by local excision with and without adjuvant irradiation. Ann Surg 1999; 230:49-54. 8. Steele GD Jr, Herndon JE, Bleday R, et al. Sphincter-sparing treatment for distal rectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1999; 6:433-41. 9. Garcia-Aguilar J, Mellgren A, Sirivongs P, et al. Local excision of rectal cancer without adjuvant therapy: a word of caution. Ann Surg 2000; 231:345-51. 10. Paty PB, Nash GM, Baron P, et al. Long-term results of local excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2002; 236:522-29. 11. Nascimbeni R, Nivatvongs S, Larson DR, et al. Long-term survival after local excision for T1 carcinoma of the rectum [published erratum appears in: Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:1325-6.] Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1773-9. 12. Madbouly KM, Remzi FH, Erkek BA, et al. Recurrence after transanal excision of T1 rectal cancer: should we be concerned? Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:711-9; discussion 179-21. 13. Endreseth BH, Myrvold HE, Romundstad P, et al. Transanal excision vs. major surgery for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:1380-8. 14. You YN, Baxter NN, Stewart A, et al. Is the increasing rate of local excision for stage I rectal cancer in the United States justified?: a nationwide cohort study from the national cancer database. Ann Surg 2007; 245:726-33. 15. Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F, et al. Oncological outcome of local vs. radical resection of low-risk pt1 rectal cancer. Arch Surg 2007; 142:649-55. 16. Gao JD, Shao YF, Bi JJ, et al. Local excision carcinoma in early stage. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9:871-3. 17. Bentrem DJ, Okabe S, Wong WD, et al. T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum: transanal excision or radical surgery? Ann Surg 2005; 242:472-7; discussion 477-9. 18. Mellgren A, Sirivongs P, Rothenberger DA, et al. Is local excision adequate therapy for early rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:1064-71; discussion 1071-4. 19. Folkesson J, Johansson R, Pahlman L, et al: Population-based study of local surgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:1421-1426, 2007. 20. Nash GM, Weiser MR, Guillem JG, et al: Long-term survival after transanal excision of T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:577-582, 2009. 21. Jesse S. Moore, Peter A. Cataldo, Turner Osler et al: Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Debate and update issues for surgical treatment of mid and lower rectal cancer 17

Rectum 51: 1026-1031, 2008. 22. Dimitrios Christoforidis, Hyeon-Min Cho, Matthew R. Dixon et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus conventional transanl excision for patients with early rectal cancer. Annals of Surgery 249, Number 5, May 2009. 23. Winde G, Nottberg H, Keller R, et al. Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:969-76. 24. Heintz A, Morschel M, Junginger T. Comparison of results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical resection for T1 carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 1145-8. 25. Lee W, Lee D, Choi S, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical surgery for T1 and T2 rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:1283-7. 26. De Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, Tollenaar RA, et al: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus total mesorectal excision of T1 rectal adenocarcinomas with curative intention. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:1280-1285, 2009. 27. Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S et al: Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol 2004 Jun; 29(6):534-43. 28. Coco C, Magistrelli P, Granone P, Roncolini G, Picciocchi A. Conservative surgery for early cancer of the distalrectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:131-6. 29. Fortunato L, Ahmad NR, Yeung RS, Coia LR, Eisenberg BL, Sigurdson ER, et al. Long-term follow-up of local excision and radiation therapy for invasive rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1193-9. 30. Steele GD Jr, Herndon JE, Bleday R, Russell A, Benson A 3rd, Hussain M, et al. Sphincter sparing treatment for distal rectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:433-41. 31. Le Voyer TE, Hoffrnan JP, Cooper H, Ross E, Sigurdson E, Eisenberg B. Local excision and chemoradiation for low rectal T1 and T2 cancers is an effective treatment. Am Surg 1999;65:625-30. 32. Russell AH, Harris J, Rosenberg PJ, Sause WT, Fisher BJ, Hoffman JP, et al. Anal sphincter conservation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum: longterm results of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 89-02. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;46:313-22. 33. Min BS, Kim NK, Ko YT, Lee KY, Baek SH, Cho CH, et al. Long-term oncologic results of patients with distal rectal cancer treated by local excision with or without adjuvant treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:1325-30. 34. Yulia Kundel, Ronen Brenner, Ofer Purim et al: Is local excision after complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer an acceptable treatment option? Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 1624 1631. 35. Schell SR, Zlotecki RA, Mendenhall WM, Marsh RW, Vauthey JN, Copeland EM III. Transanal excision of locally advanced rectal cancers downstaged using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.j Am Coll Surg. 2002;194:584 591. 36. Ruo L, Guillem JG, Minsky BD, Quan SH, Paty PB, Cohen AM. Preoperative radiation with or without chemotherapy and fullthickness transanal excision for selected T2 and T3 distal rectal cancers. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2002;17:54 58. 37. Hershman MJ, Myint AS, Makin CA. Multi-modality approach in curative local treatment of early rectal carcinomas. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5:445 450. 38. Bonnen M, Crane C, Vauthey JN, et al. Long-term result using local excision after preoperative chemoradiation among selected T3 rectal cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:1098 1105. 39. Stipa F, Lucandri G, Ferri M, Casula G, Ziparo V. Local excision of rectal cancer with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Anticancer Res. 2004;24:1167 1172. 40. Caricato M, Borzomati D, Ausania F, et al. Complementary use of local excision and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20:1203 1207. 41. Borschitz T, Wachtlin D, Möhler M, Schmidberger H, Junginger T. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and local excision for T2 3 rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:712 720. 42. Lezoche G, Baldarelli M, Guerrieri M, et al. A prospective randomized study with a 5-year minimum follow-up evaluation of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant therapy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:352 358. 43. Nair RM, Siegel EM, Chen DT, et al. Long-term results of transanal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for T2 and T3 adenocarcinomas of the rectum. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12(10):1797 1806. 44. Huh JW, Jung EJ, Park YA, Lee KY, Sohn SK. Preoperative chemoradiation followed by transanal excision for rectal cancer. J Surg Res. 2008;148:244 250. 45. Habr-Gama A, de Souza PM, Ribeiro U, et al. Low rectal cancer: impact of radiation and chemotherapy on surgical treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1087 96. 46. Habr-Gama A, de Souza PM, Ribeiro U, et al. Multimodality therapy in low rectal cancer: long-term outcome of complete responders. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:A18. 47. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W, et al: Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: Long-term results. Ann Surg 240:711-717, 2004; discussion 717-718. 18 Nam Kyu Kim

Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology Summer 2012;Vol.8,NO.1: 48. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Proscurshim I, et al: Patterns of failure and survival for nonoperative treatment of stage c0 distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 10: 1319-1328, 2006; discussion 1328-1329. 49. Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM, Lammering G, Nelemans PJ, Engelen SM et al.wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 4633 640. 50. Kraske P. Zur extirpation hochsitzender mastdarmkrebse. Verch Dtsch Ges Chirurgie 1885;14:464-74. 51. Parks AG, Pery JP. Resection and sutured coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1982;69:301-4. 52. Williams NS, Price R, Johnston D. The long term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on function of the anal sphincter in man. Br J Surg 1980; 67:203-8. 53. Ho YH, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses. Br J Surg 1996;83:978-80. 54. Hallböök O, Nyström PO, Sjödahl R. Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:332-8. 55. Joo JS, Latulippe JF, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained? Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:740-6. 56. Fürst A, Burghofer K, Hutzel L, Jauch KW. Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:660-7. 57. Drake DB, Pemberton JH, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR, Wolff BG. Coloanal anastomosis in the management of benign and malignant rectal disease. Ann Surg 1987;206:600-5. 58. Cavaliere F, Pemberton JH, Cosimelli M, Fazio VW, Beart RW Jr. Coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Long-term results at the Mayo and Cleveland Clinics. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:807-12. 59. Parc R, Berger A, Tiret E, Frileux P, Nordlinger B, Hannoun L. Colo-anal anastomosis with reservoir in the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol (Paris) 1987;23:329-31. 60. Huguet C, Harb J, Bona S. Coloanal anastomosis after resection of low rectal cancer in the elderly. World J Surg 1990;14:619-23. 61. Hautefeuille P, Valleur P, Perniceni T, Martin B, Galian A, Cherqui D, et al. Functional and oncologic results after coloanal anastomosis for low rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 1988;207:61-4. 62. Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY, Sohn SK, Cho CH. Hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for distal rectal cancer: long-term clinical outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:775-80. 63. Kang JH, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY, Kim NK et al: Roboti coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by Robotic procedure. Ann Surg Oncol (2012) 19:154-155. 64. Moore HG, Riedel E, Minsky BD, Saltz L, Paty P, Wong D, et al. Adequacy of 1-cm distal margin after restorative rectal cancer resection with sharp mesorectal excision and preoperative combined-modality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:80-5. 65. Braun J, Treutner KH,Winkeltau G, Heidenreich U, Lerch MM, Schumpelick V. Results of intersphincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1992; 163: 407 412. 66. Bannon JP, Marks GJ, Mohiuddin M, Rakinic J, Jian NZ, Nagle D. Radical and local excisional methods of sphincter-sparing surgery after high-dose radiation for cancer of the distal 3 cm of the rectum. Ann Surg Oncol 1995; 2: 221 227. 67. Köhler A, Athanasiadis S, Ommer A, Psarakis E. Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 843 850. 68. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, Rullier A, Vendrely V, Zerbib F. Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 465 469. 69. Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, Rosen HR, Renner K, Holbling N. Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1858 1865. 70. Saito N, Moriya Y, Shirouzu K, Maeda K, Mochizuki H, Koda K et al. Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49(Suppl): S13 S22. 71. Chamlou R, Parc Y, Simon T, Bennis M, Dehni N, Parc R et al. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 916 921. 72. Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, Ishiguro S, Yamaguchi T, Fujita S et al. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma: univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 2668 2676. 73. Krand O, Yalti T, Tellioglu G, Kara M, Berber I, Titiz MI. Use of smooth muscle plasty after intersphincteric rectal resection to replace a partially resected internal anal sphincter: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1895 1901. 74. Han JG, Wei GH, Gao ZG, Zheng Y, Wang ZJ. Intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosisfor ultralow rectal cancer: the experience of People s Republic of China. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 950 957. 75. Saito N, Sugito M, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Yoneyama Y et al. Oncologic outcome of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. World J Surg 2009; 33: Debate and update issues for surgical treatment of mid and lower rectal cancer 19

1750 1756. 76. Weiser MR, Quah HM, Shia J, Guillem JG, Paty PB, Temple LK et al. Sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer is facilitated by preoperative chemoradiation and intersphincteric dissection. Ann Surg 2009; 249: 236 242. 77. Yamada K, Ogata S, Saiki Y, Fukunaga M, Tsuji Y, Takano M. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1065 1071. 78. Bozzeitti F, Mariani L, Miceli R, Doci R, Montalto F, Andreola S, et al. Cancer of the low and middle rectum: local and distant recurrences, and survival in 350 radically resected patients. J Surg Oncol 1996;62:207-13. 79. Zaheer S, Pemberton JH, Farouk R, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Ilstrup D. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 1998;227:800-11. 80. Kim JS, Lee CR, Kim NK, Hur H, Min BS et al: Intersphincteric resection and colonanal anastomosis for very low lying rectal cancer. J Korean Surg Soc 2009; 76: 28-35. 81. Kim JS, Hur H, Kim NK et al: Oncologic Outcomes After Radical Surgery Following Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer: Abdominoperineal Resection Versus Sphincter-Preserving Procedure Ann Surg Oncol (2009) 16:1266 1273. 82. Heald RJ, Smedh RK, Kald A, Sexton R, Moran BJ. Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum an endangered operation. Norman Nigro Lectureship. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40: 747 51. 83. Law WL, Chu KW. Abdominoperineal resection is associated with poor oncological outcome. Br J Surg 2004;91:1493 9. 84. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, et al. The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 2005;242:74 82. 85. Wibe A, Møller B, Norstein J, et al. A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:857 66. 86. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P. Pathology review committee low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:9257 64. 87. J. Braun, K. H. Treutner, G.Winkeltau, U. Heidenreich, M. M. Lerch, and V. Schumpelick, Results of intersphincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma, The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 407 412, 1992. 88. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial, Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 336, no. 14, pp. 980 987, 1997. 89. L. J. Kuo, C. S. Hung, C. H. Wu et al., Oncological and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer, Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 170, pp. e93 e98, 2011. 90. Chambers W, Khan A, Waters R, Lindsey I, George B, Mortensen N et al. Examination of outcome following Abdominoperineal Resection for adenocarcinoma in Oxford. Colorectal Dis 2010;12:1192 7. 91. Ueno M, Oya M, Azekura K, Yamaguchi T, Muto T. Incidence and prognostic significance of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92:756 65. 92. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, Haffner J, Wiig JN, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group. Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg 2004;91:210 6. 93. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 2008;26:303-12. 94. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Holm T, Quirke P. Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3517 3522. 95. G. Portier1, L. Ghouti1, S. Kirzin1, R. Guimbaud1 et al ; Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. British Journal of Surgery 2007; 94: 341 345. 96. Holbling. Shirouzu K, Ogata Y, Araki Y, Kishimoto Y, Sato Y. A new ultimate anus-preserving operation for extremely low rectal cancer and for anal canal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2003;7:203-6. 20 Nam Kyu Kim

Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology Summer 2012;Vol.8,NO.1: Debate and update issues for surgical treatment of mid and lower rectal cancer Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Nam Kyu Kim, M.D. Updates and Debate issues form the surgical treatment of middle or low rectal cancer The main goals for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer were the complete removal of the rectal cancer with surrounding lymphatic draining area, which subsequently result in decreasing the rate of local recurrence as well as prolong patient survival. If the tumor located at the near the anal canal, concerning issues will be whether anal sphincter can be preserved or not and furthermore autonomic pelvic nervous system could be saved or not. Multidisciplinary approach for rectal cancer has been more popular and treatment strategy rapidly changing based on more accurate preoperative local staging finding and minimal invasive surgical techniques become popular too. One of the advance technology is the development of transanal local excision techniques such Transanal endoscopic microsurgery technique such as TEM(transendoscopic microsurgery), TEO(transendoscopic operation) and TAMIS (transanal minimal invasive surgery). Those techniques make us be able to excise early rectal cancer with full thickness as well as unfragmented state, also can be approached to the upper rectum, which can not approach with previous conventional transanal approach method. Local excision for early T1 rectal cancer has been regards as good treatment option because patient can avoid complication related to the radial proctotectomy such as anastomoitc leakage, postoperative sexual and voiding dysfunction and dysregulated bowel movements. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy has been recommended for patient with ct3n0 or ct3 N+ rectal cancer because some clinical trials showed us preoperative chemoradiation therapy showed better local control rate and less toxicities than postoperative chemoradiation treatment. Recent clinical trial both retrospective and prospective showed us a promising results about local excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation selectively in patients with low rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for ct2n0 followed by local excision reported excellent oncologic outcomes quite comparable to the radical surgery group. In addition to that, there has been some reports which showed clinical complete remission after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy could be wait and see. A couple of observational studies showed wait and see can be possible option of treatment in selective patients. Radial surgery for middle and low rectal cancer still remains a cornerstone of surgical treatment Ultralow anterior resection with or without intersphincteric resection became a more standard surgical method for low rectal cancer. Oncologic and functional outcomes has been reported as safe even functional outcomes study was rare. Furthermore, Abdominoperineal resection has been famous for high intraoperative tumor perforation and positive circumferential resection margin, those factors have been contributed to the high rate of local recurrence and poor survival rate compared with sphincter saving procedures for rectal cancer. Recently, there have been great efforts Debate and update issues for surgical treatment of mid and lower rectal cancer 21

for reducing theses problem and total levator excision or extended abdominoperineal resection concepts emerged. Surgeons who advocated this concept recommended perineal dissection under the Jack-knife position. Surgical management for low rectal cancer should be directed for radically and preserving function based on multimodality approach. We need more high level of evidence based on prospective clinical trials for tailored treatment of rectal cancer patients 22 Nam Kyu Kim