설문-인터뷰-america 9차.indd

Similar documents
32

다 함께 모였습니다. 예술가와 시민, 우리 주변의 소외된 이웃들까지. 클래식과 국악을 넘나드는 아름다운 소리가 아르코예술극장의 겨울밤을 반짝이게 했습니다. 마음으로 준비한 새해 선물 <당신을 위한 노래>처럼 여러분들의 2015년 한 해도 예술 한 조각으로 따스해질 수


0802¼þ½Çµ¿¹®È¸-69È£ÃâÃâ

歯 PDF

Holland Bar Stool BL1BKAppStU Appalachian State University Logo Pendant Light with Black Finish - 120V Holland Bar Stool BL1BKArizSt-F Arizona State U

untitled

LIG문화재단 레지던스-L은 국내 중견급 공연예술인들을 위한 2년제 레지던시 프로그램이다. 고유한 예술적 지향점을 제시하며 괄목할 만한 창작 활동을 펼쳐가고 있는, 앞서가는 예술인 지원을 위해 2010년에 출범한 프로그램이다. 일회성 제작지원 방식의 한계를 극복해 보려


목원 한국화- 북경전을 준비하며 지난해부터 시작 된 한국의 목원대학교 한국화 전공의 해외미술체험은 제자와 스승의 동행 속에서 미술가로 성장하는 학생들의 지식에 샘을 채워주는 장학사업으로 진행되고 있으며, 한국의 우수한 창작인력 양성을 위해, 배움을 서로 나누는 스승들의

1

2001 Seoul Arts Center Anual report _ Reports of Operations Opera House

정현진, <FATAL> 제작노트 中 매력은 사람을 끌어들이는 힘을 말한다. 사람의 매력은 단지 외형적인 뛰어남을 넘어 그 사람만의 고유한 이미지에서 만들어진다. 모두가 추구하는 획일화되고 일률적인 외모보다, 의도치 않게 뿜어져 나오는 것. 그것이 진정한 매력이자 FAT

5 2012년, 세종문화회관 무대를 채워나갈 공연과 무대를 빛낼 헤로인을 <문화공간>에서 만나보세요. 02 Look of sejong 한방 치유 음악회 <동행> contents september 2012 NO SEOUL CULTURE SCHEDULE 서울

C O N T E N T S DAEGU ARTS CENTER 2016 Repertory Season Program DAC ()

untitled

<30315FC0CCB5BFC1D65FC7D1B1B9BCBAB8C5B8C52E687770>

???춍??숏


사운드네트워크(주)_소개서 KEYNOTE( )

AT_GraduateProgram.key

1

레이아웃 1

특집.레터

KAGRO

1

Boston College Eagles VS Bryant University Bulldogs Friday, October 12, 2012 Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts Event 2 Men 200 Yard Medley Relay 1 Bryant U

시민청에서 더 많은 재미를 만나세요! 인터넷 검색창에 시민청 을 검색하세요. 02)


27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

공대상상8호표지

12 공익 과 수익 을 동시에 추구해야 하는 사회적 기업이라는 모순된 모델을 가장 성공시킬 수 있는 선수들은 창의력과 상상력을 갖춘 예술가와 기획자들이 아닐까? 44 사진전은 전시실에 선뜻 들어서기 어려운 매력이 있다. 사진기라는 기계로 작품을 만들어서일까, 어쩐지 전

business structure CJ Culture Foundation 문화를 키우다 나누다 CJ문화재단이 하는 일 다양한 장르의 창작자 지원을 통한 문화융성 세계 무대를 향한 도전 함께하는 문화나눔 우리는 문화의 다양성을 추구합니다. CJ문화재단은 자유로운 상상,

1

Microsoft Word - NEW08_prof. Ma

2 철원기행 End of winter (HD / color, 99min, 2014) Producing 이임걸 Lee Im-kul ScreenWriting 박진수 Park Jin-soo Directing 김대환 Kim Dae-hwan Film Festival / Awar

5.5~ ~ (전야제무료) 5.1~5.2 1~ ~ ~


5-김재철

취업지원(0222)_인쇄용.hwp

쩔짤횉횪쨔횣쨩챌-쨘짙?횑횂징횊占승맡㈑올?PDF

공연장

KAGRO 7-8¿ù-ÀÎÅͳݿë

Absolute Blue 태양의 위세 앞에서도 당당한 여자의 자존 심을 닮은 컬러. 바람을 닮아 유연한, 물을 닮아 자유롭게, 거칠 것 없이 여름의 클라 이맥스에 올라서서 세상을 물들이는 소리 없는 지배자, 블루

현 안 분 석 2 Catsouphes & Smyer, 2006). 우리나라도 숙련된 인 력부족에 대한 우려가 심화되고 있으며, 일자리의 미 스매치 수준이 해외 주요국보다 심각하다는 점도 지 지부진한 유연근무제의 확산을 위한 진정성 있는 노 력이 필요하다는 점을 보여준다

,, ,

03 Contents May LOTTE Focus 04 클로즈업 02 포커스 롯데 HR 포럼 기획 06 롯데월드몰을 가다 마케팅 어워드 시리즈 5 10 롯데백화점 06 인사이드 롯데 12 롯데멤버스 특집 14 롯데월드타워 첨단 기술 현장스케치

16

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

1+2월호-최종2

* pb77¹¼úÀÇÇöÀå02š

Ç¥Áö

1

¸Þ´º¾ó-ÀÛ¾÷5

untitled

2010_05¿ùÈ£ ÃÖÁ¾

관객들의 안전을 책임지겠습니다. 비상시 대응력 강화 훈련 상설화 어느 때보다 슬프고 가슴 아팠던 봄이 지나가고 있습니다. 예술가들은 이러한 때에 문화예술이 어떤 역할을 해야하는지 고민하고 각자의 역할에 충실하며 나름대로의 방식으로 애도하는 마음을 표하고 있습니다. 많은

레이아웃 1

<31332EBEC6C6AEB8B6C4C9C6C3C0BB20C8B0BFEBC7D120C6D0C5B0C1F6B5F0C0DAC0CE20BFACB1B82E687770>

문화+서울 contents 월의 문화+서울 인문학, 예술에 홀리다 지난해 삼성경제연구소에서는 미래 경영의 새로운 돌파 구가 바로 인문학이다 라는 연구자료를 발표했다. 이뿐만 이 아니다. 故 스티브 잡스 역시 자신의 디자인 철학이 인 문학에 궤를 두고

2 大 韓 政 治 學 會 報 ( 第 18 輯 1 號 ) 과의 소통부재 속에 여당과 국회도 무시한 일방적인 밀어붙이기식 국정운영을 보여주고 있다. 민주주의가 무엇인지 다양하게 논의될 수 있지만, 민주주의 운영에 필요한 최소한의 제도적 조건은 권력 행사에서 국가기관 사이의

GMI_2010_10월호_pdf용.indd

003 The sun never sets on us 마라도에서 강원도 삼척의 두메산골까지 그리고 저 멀리 지구 반대편의 아르헨티나까지라도 채권이 있 는 곳이면 어디든지 달려간다. 나의 하루는 24시간 으로도 모자라다. 깨어있으나 꿈꾸고 있으나 나의 업무는 전국 아니 전

지누얼의 살며 사랑하며

1

신세계

p. 10 Before You Read p. 26 Understanding the Story ( ).,.,..,,...,...

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

연구기관 문화기획집단 영희야놀자 문화기획집단 영희야 놀자는 여성의 시선을 통해 세상을 바라보고 해석하며 사람들과 소통 하고자 하는 여성들이 모여 만든 문화기획집단입니다. 영희 는 우리 자신들이자 우리가 말 걸 고 싶은 우리 세대 보통 여자들을 의미합니다. 그동안 <모래

12 올해도 어김없이 우리 곁을 찾아온 하이서울페스티벌. 서울광장과 청계천, 서울의 5대 궁궐에서 개최되는 이번 축제는 서울 시민뿐만 아니라, 전 세계인들이 다시 찾는 놀이의 장을 만들 것이다. 서울의 봄, 희망으로 피다 를 슬로건으로 내건 하이서울페스티벌 2009를

(김재영)서울대학교-제주평화연구원 공동정책회의 발표문.hwp

±Â¸ð´×-08. 1¿ùb61¹¹®š

Cousultingº»¹®

12 세계가 지구촌 이 된 글로벌시대. 경제교류의 장벽이 무너진 데 이어 이제는 명실 공히 문화교류의 시대다. 특히 2000년대 들어서는 동시대 작가들의 작품 교류와 공동 작업이 활발해지고 있으며, 이러한 트렌드에 맞춰 작가들의 해외거주 작품 활동을 지원하는 국제 레지

: 4 2. : (KSVD) 4 3. :

!DVD브로셔

글로벌인재양성기금 모금 캠페인 한국외국어대학교와 함께 성장하는 외대사랑후원업소의 무한한 발전을 기원합니다. 발전기금문의 ~2796 (한국외대 발전협력팀) 금강산 래미안2차 앞 이삭토스트 토스트 호프 디엠 설악산수 후즈후 음식업

한류스토리 vol11 5월호(0215).indd

<C5EBB1C73333C8A BFF9C8A329B9AEC8ADBFCD20B1E2BCFAC0C720B8B8B3B22E687770>

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

?

1

16(1)-3(국문)(p.40-45).fm

목 차 회사현황 1. 회사개요 2. 회사연혁 3. 회사업무영역/업무현황 4. 등록면허보유현황 5. 상훈현황 6. 기술자보유현황 7. 시스템보유현황 주요기술자별 약력 1. 대표이사 2. 임원짂 조직 및 용도별 수행실적 1. 조직 2. 용도별 수행실적

별을 닮은 대학 별을 담은 대학 KYUNGSUNG UNIVERSITY 학생 중심의 맞춤형 진로설계, 취업&창업 프로그램 복수학위부터 해외 인턴십까지, 글로벌 네트워크 세상을 움직이는 경성인, 동문 파워 교육 패러다임의 진화, 교육 학생지원 프로그램

00½ÃÀÛ 5š

±Â¸ð´×ÀÎõ ÃÖÁ¾

<B0F8BFACC4DCC5D9C3F7B1E2C8B92E687770>

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

*BA_00

µµ·Ïº»¹®Ãâ·ÂÃÖÁ¾

CONTENTS 이사장 인사말 한눈에 보는 2013 서울장학재단 서울장학재단 소개 2013 대학생 대상 장학사업 2013 초중고등학교 대상 장학사업 신규사업 회계결산보고 시민과 함께 배움을 선물합니다 서울장학재단 배움의 고른 기회

±ÇµÎ¾ðÀÛ¾÷¼öÁ¤2

menu_10p_all_161020_cs6

MY FIRST BMW My First BMW

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

1


<33B1C720C1FDB4DCC8F1BBFD C3D6C1BEC6EDC1FD E687770>

<C6EDC1FD2DC1A636C8B820C1A6C1D6C7D8BAF1C4A120BEC6C6AEC6E4BDBAC6BCB9FA2E687770>

Transcription:

II : 1 Questionnaire Interview 09-04-03

Questionnaire ( ) 016 1 045. 016 1 046. 018 2 019 1. 048 5. 021 2. 048. 023 3. 049. 051. 026 2 054 055 2 1. 026 1 056. 027 1. 058. 027. 1 029. 2 059. 031. 3 033. 061 2. 033 2. 063 3. 035 3. 063. 064. 035. 066 4. 037. 068 5. 038 4. 068. 1 038. 069. 2 040. 071. 3 042. 073. 044.

074 3 100 101 102 2... 074 1 103 3. 075 1. 104 4. 076 2. 106 5. 078 3. 108 2 080 4. 109 1. 082 5. 110 2. 082. 084. 112 3. 084. 113 4. 086 2 087 089 090 1. 2. 3. 116 5 116 1 092 4. 117 1. 094 5. 119 2. 119. 1 096 6. 120. 2 122. 3 098 4 124 125 126 128. 3. 4. 5. 098 1 099 1. 130 6.

132 2 137 2. ( ) 133 1. CTFD, DTRC 138 3. ( ) 133. CTFD / DTRC 138. 139. 135. CTFD / DTRC 141. 136. CTFD / DTRC 019 < 1-1> 021 < 1-2> 023 < 1-3> 024 < 1-4> 028 < 2-1> 1 030 < 2-2> 2 032 < 2-3> 3 034 < 2-4> 036 < 2-5> 038 < 2-6> 040 < 2-7> 042 < 2-8> 043 044 046 047 < 2-9> < 2-10> < 2-11> < 2-12>

049 050 052 056 057 059 061 062 064 066 067 069 071 072 076 078 079 080 082 083 084 085 087 088 089 090 091 092 094 < 2-13> ( + ) < 2-14> < 2-15> < 2-16> < 2-17> ( 2009 3 ) < 2-18> < 2-19> < 2-20> < 2-21> ( 2009 3 ) < 2-22> < 2-23> < 2-24> 1 < 2-25> 2 < 2-26> 3 < 3-1> < 3-2> < 3-3> 2007, 2008, 2009 ( + ) < 3-4> ( + ) < 3-5> / (2008.4.1 2009.3.31 ) < 3-6> < 3-7> < 3-8> < 3-9> 2008, 2009 < 3-10> < 3-11> 2008, 2009 < 3-12> < 3-13> 2007, 2008, 2009 / < 3-14> / < 3-15>

095 095 097 100 102 103 104 105 107 110 111 113 114 118 120 122 123 124 126 128 129 130 134 136 137 138 139 140 142 < 3-16> 2007, 2008, 2009 < 3-17> < 3-18> < 4-1> ( / ) < 4-2> : < 4-3> : < 4-4> < 4-5> < 4-6> < 4-7> < 4-8> < 4-9>, < 4-10> < 5-1> < 5-2> 1 < 5-3> 2 < 5-4> 3 < 5-5> < 5-6> < 5-7> < 5-8> < 5-9> < 5-10> CTFD / DTRC < 5-11> CTFD / DTRC < 5-12> CTFD / DTRC < 5-13> 2007, 2009 ( ) < 5-14> ( ) < 5-15> ( ) < 5-16> ( )

020 020 020 021 022 022 022 023 024 024 027 027 028 029 029 030 031 031 032 033 033 034 034 035 035 036 037 037 < 1-1> < 1-2> < 1-3> < 1-4> < 1-5> < 1-6> < 1-7> < 1-8> < 1-9> < 1-10> < 2-1> 1 < 2-2> 1 < 2-3> 1 < 2-4> 2 < 2-5> 2 < 2-6> 2 < 2-7> 3 < 2-8> 3 < 2-9> 3 < 2-10> < 2-11> < 2-12> < 2-13> < 2-14> < 2-15> < 2-16> < 2-17> < 2-18>

038 039 039 040 041 041 041 042 043 043 044 045 045 045 046 048 048 049 049 050 050 051 051 051 055 055 055 056 057 < 2-19> < 2-20> < 2-21> < 2-22> < 2-23> < 2-24> < 2-25> < 2-26> < 2-27> < 2-28> < 2-29> < 2-30> < 2-31> < 2-32> < 2-33> < 2-34> ( + ) < 2-35> ( + ) < 2-36> ( + ) < 2-37> < 2-38> < 2-39> < 2-40> < 2-41> < 2-42> < 2-43> < 2-44> < 2-45> < 2-46> ( 2009 3 ) < 2-47> ( 2009 3 )

057 058 058 059 059 060 060 061 062 062 063 063 064 065 065 065 066 067 068 068 069 069 070 070 071 072 072 073 075 < 2-48> ( 2009 3 ) < 2-49> < 2-50> < 2-51> < 2-52> < 2-53> < 2-54> < 2-55> < 2-56> < 2-57> < 2-58> ( 2009 3 ) < 2-59> ( 2009 3 ) < 2-60> ( 2009 3 ) < 2-61> < 2-62> < 2-63> < 2-64> < 2-65> < 2-66> 1 < 2-67> 1 < 2-68> 1 < 2-69> 2 < 2-70> 2 < 2-71> 2 < 2-72> 3 < 2-73> 3 < 2-74> 3 < 2-75> < 3-1>

075 076 077 077 079 079 079 080 081 081 082 083 083 084 085 087 088 088 089 089 091 091 092 093 093 093 094 095 096 < 3-2> < 3-3> < 3-4> < 3-5> < 3-6> 2007, 2008, 2009 ( + ) < 3-7> ( + ) < 3-8> ( + ) < 3-9> / (2008.4.1 2009.3.31 ) < 3-10> / (2008.4.1 2009.3.31 ) < 3-11> / (2008.4.1 2009.3.31 ) < 3-12> < 3-13> < 3-14> < 3-15> < 3-16> < 3-17> 2008, 2009 < 3-18> < 3-19> < 3-20> 2008, 2009 < 3-21> < 3-22> 2007, 2008, 2009 / < 3-23> / < 3-24> / < 3-25> < 3-26> < 3-27> < 3-28> 2007, 2008, 2009 < 3-29> < 3-30>

096 097 099 099 100 101 101 102 103 103 104 104 105 106 106 107 109 109 109 110 111 111 112 112 112 113 114 114 117 < 3-31> < 3-32> < 4-1> < 4-2> < 4-3> < 4-4> < 4-5> < 4-6> < 4-7> < 4-8> < 4-9> < 4-10> < 4-11> < 4-12> < 4-13> < 4-14> < 4-15> < 4-16> < 4-17> < 4-18> < 4-19> < 4-20> < 4-21>, < 4-22> < 4-23> < 4-24> < 4-25> < 4-26> < 5-1>

117 118 119 119 120 121 121 121 122 123 123 124 125 125 126 126 127 127 128 129 129 130 133 133 134 135 135 136 137 < 5-2> < 5-3> < 5-4> 1 < 5-5> 1 < 5-6> 1 < 5-7> 2 < 5-8> 2 < 5-9> 2 < 5-10> 3 < 5-11> 3 < 5-12> 3 < 5-13> < 5-14> 2007, 2008, 2009 < 5-15> < 5-16> < 5-17> < 5-18> < 5-19> < 5-20> < 5-21> < 5-22> < 5-23> < 5-24> CTFD / DTRC < 5-25> CTFD / DTRC < 5-26> CTFD / DTRC < 5-27> CTFD / DTRC < 5-28> CTFD / DTRC < 5-29> CTFD / DTRC < 5-30> ( )

138 138 139 140 140 140 141 142 142 < 5-31> ( ) < 5-32> ( ) < 5-33> ( ) < 5-34> ( ) < 5-35> ( ) < 5-36> ( ) < 5-37> ( ) < 5-38> ( ) < 5-39> ( ) Interview ( ) 148 156 168 174 182 190 202 208 220 226 232 236 242 248 260 266 272 278 286 292 296 308 314 320 326 332 340

Questionnaire

1 1

. ( ) 2009 :,.,,,,. ( ). 2009, 2009 4 27 7 10 11.,. 2007 2008 :.. 7.,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ). : 17

2

., 25 3 (13.6%), 26 ~30 7 (31.8%), 31 ~35 2 (9.1%), 36 ~40 6 (27.3%), 41 4 (18.2%)., 7 (31.8%), 15 (68.2%)., 5 (22.7%), 8 (36.4%), 9 (40.9%)., 3 (13.6%), 8 (36.4%), 11 (50.0%)., 12 (54.6%), 7 (31.8%), 3 (13.6%)., 18 (81.8%), 4 (18.2%)., 5 (22.7%), 15 (68.2%), 2 (9.1%)., 20 (90.9%), 2 (9.1%). < 1-1> % [ ] 22 100.0 25 3 13.6 26 30 7 31.8 31 35 2 9.1 36 40 6 27.3 41 4 18.2 7 31.8 15 68.2 5 22.7 8 36.4 9 40.9 3 13.6 8 36.4 11 50.0 12 54.6 7 31.8 3 13.6 18 81.8 4 18.2 5 22.7 15 68.2 2 9.1 1., 26 30 31.8%, 36 40 27.3%, 41 18.2%, 25 13.6%, 31 35 9.1%. : 19

< 1-1> 13.6% 31.8 9.1 27.3 18.2 ( 25 26 30 31 35 36 40 41 ),,.,, 41 66.7%, 26 30 36 40 37.5%, 26 30 36.4%. < 1-2> 33.3% 66.7 12.5% 37.5 12.5 37.5 18.2% 36.4 27.3 18.2 ( 25 26 30 31 35 36 40 41 ),, 26 30 41.7%, 25 26 30 28.6%, 41 66.7%. 30 57.2%. < 1-3> 8.3% 41.7 8.3 25.0 16.7 28.6% 28.6 42.9 33.3% 66.7 ( 25 26 30 31 35 36 40 41 ),, 41 80.0%, 26 ~30, 36 ~40,,,. Questionnaire( ) : 20

< 1-4> 20.0% 80.0 20.2% 46.7 6.7 26.7 100% ( 25 26 30 31 35 36 40 41 ) < 1-2> 25 26 30 31 35 36 40 41 [ ] ( ) 3 7 2 6 4 22 (%) 13.6 31.8 9.1 27.3 18.2 100.0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 100.0 1 3 1 3 0 8 12.5 37.5 12.5 37.5 0.0 100.0 2 4 0 3 2 11 18.2 36.4 0.0 27.3 18.2 100.0 1 5 1 3 2 12 8.3 41.7 8.3 25.0 16.7 100.0 2 2 0 3 0 7 28.6 28.6 0.0 42.9 0.0 100.0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 100.0 0 0 1 0 4 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 100.0 3 7 1 4 0 15 20.0 46.7 6.7 26.7 0.0 100.0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 2., 50.0%, 36.4%, 13.6%. : 21

< 1-5> 13.6% 36.4 50.0 ( ).,,., 66.7%, 33.3%. < 1-6> 66.7% 33.3 100.0% 100.0% ( ),, 60.0%, 40.0%, 53.3%, 46.7%.. < 1-7> 60.0% 40.0 46.7% 53.3 50.0% 50.0 ( ) Questionnaire( ) : 22

< 1-3> [ ] ( ) 3 8 11 22 (%) 13.6 36.4 50.0 100.0 0 8 4 12 0.0 66.7 33.3 100.0 0 0 7 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 3 0 0 3 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 3 0 2 5 60.0 0.0 40.0 100.0 0 7 8 15 0.0 46.7 53.3 100.0 0 1 1 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 100.0 3., 68.2%, 22.7%, 9.1%. < 1-8> 22.7% 68.2 9.1 ( ), 54.6%, 31.8%, 13.6%. : 23

< 1-9> 54.6% 31.8 13.6 ( ), 75.0%, 85.7%, 100.0%. < 1-10> 16.7% 75.0 8.3 85.7% 14.3 100.0% ( ) < 1-4> [ ] 5 15 2 22 % 22.7 68.2 9.1 100.0 2 9 1 12 16.7 75.0 8.3 100.0 0 6 1 7 0.0 85.7 14.3 100.0 3 0 0 3 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 24

: 25

2 1

1. 3... 1 1, 77.3%,,,, 4.5%. < 2-1> 1 4.5% 77.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 ( / / ) 0% =, 85.7%, 66.7%, 100.0%. < 2-2> 1 8.3 66.7 8.3 8.3 8.3 85.7 14.3 100.0 ( / / ) : 27

0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0,,,, /. < 2-3> 1 < 2-1> 1 6.7 73.3 6.7 6.7 6.7 50.0 50.0 ( / / ) / [ ] ( ) 1 17 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 22 (%) 4.5 77.3 4.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 4.5 100.0 1 8 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 12 8.3 66.7 8.3 0.0 0.0 8.3 8.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0.0 85.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 100.0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 11 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 15 6.7 73.3 6.7 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 6.7 100.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 / 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 28

. 2 2, 31.8%, 22.7%, 18.2%, 13.6%. < 2-4> 2 31.8% 18.2 4.5 4.5 22.7 4.5 13.6 ( / / ) 0% =, 41.7%, 28.6%,, 33.3%. < 2-5> 2 41.7% 25.0 25.0 8.3 28.6% 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 33.3% 33.3 33.3 ( / / ) : 29

, 33.3%, 50.0%, 40.0%. < 2-6> 2 20.0% 20.0 20.0 40.0 33.3% 20.0 6.7 26.7 6.7 6.7 50.0% 50.0 ( / / ) 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 < 2-2> 2 50.0 100.0 [ ] ( ) 1 17 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 22 (%) 31.8 18.2 4.5 4.5 22.7 0.0 0.0 4.5 13.6100.0 5 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 12 41.7 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 100.0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 7 28.6 14.3 14.3 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 14.3 14.3 100.0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 100.0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 5 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 100.0 5 3 1 0 4 0 0 1 1 15 33.3 20.0 6.7 0.0 26.7 0.0 0.0 6.7 6.7 100.0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 / / Questionnaire( ) : 30

. 3 3, 27.3%, 22.7%, 13.6%, 13.6%. < 2-7> 3 13.6% 4.5 9.1 13.6 27.3 4.5 22.7 4.5 ( / ) 0% = /, 41.7%, 42.9%,, 33.3%. < 2-8> 3 25.0% 8.3 41.7 8.3 16.7 28.6% 42.9 28.6 33.3% 33.3 33.3 ( / ), 60.0%, 26.7%, 50.0%. : 31

/ / < 2-9> 3 60.0% 20.0 20.0 13.3% 6.7 13.3 13.3 20.0 6.7 26.7 50.0% 50.0 ( / ) < 2-3> 3 [ ] ( ) 3 1 2 3 6 1 0 5 1 22 (%) 13.6 4.5 9.1 13.6 27.3 4.5 0.0 22.7 4.5100.0 3 1 0 0 5 1 0 2 0 12 25.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 41.7 8.3 0.0 16.7 0.0 100.0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 2 0 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 42.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 33.3 33.3 100.0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 100.0 2 1 2 2 3 1 0 4 0 15 13.3 6.7 13.3 13.3 20.0 6.7 0.0 26.7 0.0 100.0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 32

., 33.3%, 16.7%, 7.6%, 7.5%, 6.1%. < 2-10> 16.7% 33.3 6.1 7.6 16.7 1.5 9.1 7.5 1.5 ( / / ) 2., 40.9%, / 31.8%, 22.7%, / 4.5%. < 2-11> 40.9% 31.8 4.5 22.7 ( / / ), 50.0%, 42.9%. : 33

< 2-12> 50.0% 33.3 16.7 42.9% 28.6 14.3 14.3 33.3% 66.7 ( / / ), 60.0%, / 26.7%, / 50.0%. 60.0%, / 40.0%. < 2-13> 40.0% 60.0 60.0% 26.7 6.7 6.7 50.0% 50.0 ( / / ) < 2-4> / / [ ] ( ) 9 7 1 5 22 (%) 40.9 31.8 4.5 22.7 100.0 6 4 0 2 12 50.0 33.3 0.0 16.7 100.0 3 2 1 1 7 42.9 28.6 14.3 14.3 100.0 0 1 0 2 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 100.0 0 2 0 3 5 0.0 40.0 0.0 60.0 100.0 9 4 1 1 15 60.0 26.7 6.7 6.7 100.00 0 1 0 1 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 34

3.., /., 54.5%. 31.8%, 9.1%, / 4.5%. < 2-14> 9.1% 31.8 4.5 54.5 ( / / ), 100.0%, 66.7%. 41.7%, 41.7%, 8.3%, / 8.3%. < 2-15> 8.3% 41.7 8.3 41.7 100.0% 33.3% 66.7 ( / / ), 80.0%, 73.3%, 50.0%, 50.0%., : 35

55.0%, 30.0%, 10.0%, / 5%. 50.0%. < 2-16> 20.0% 80.0 6.7% 13.3% 6.7 73.3 50.0% 50.0 ( / / ) < 2-5> / / [ ] ( ) 2 7 1 12 22 (%) 9.1 31.8 4.5 54.5 100.0 1 5 1 5 12 8.3 41.7 8.3 41.7 100.0 0 0 0 7 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 1 2 0 0 3 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 4 0 0 5 20.0 80.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 2 1 11 15 6.7 13.3 6.7 73.3 100.00 0 1 0 1 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 36

., 40.9%, 27.3%, 18.2%, 13.6%. < 2-17> 13.6% 40.9 18.2 27.3 ( ) 0% =, 41.7%, 33.3%, 16.7%, 8.3%. 57.1%, 28.6%, 14.3%, 66.7%, 33.3%.,,. < 2-18> 16.7% 41.7% 8.3 33.3 57.1% 14.3 28.6 33.3% 66.7 ( ), 60.0%, 20.0%, 60.0%, 20.0%, 13.3%, 6.7%, 100%. : 37

< 2-19> 20.0% 60.0 20.0 13.3% 60.0 6.7 20.0 100.0% ( ) < 2-6> [ ] ( ) 0 3 9 4 6 22 (%) 0.0 13.6 40.9 18.2 27.3 100.0 0 2 5 1 4 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 8.3 33.3 100.0 0 0 4 1 2 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 14.3 28.6 100.0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 100.0 0 1 0 3 1 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 100.0 0 2 9 1 3 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 6.7 20.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 4..., 54.5%, 18.2%, 13.6%, 9.1%, 4.5%. 2008 : (2008 : 14) 61.3% Questionnaire( ) : 38

,. < 2-20> 18.2% 9.1 13.6 4.5 54.5 ( ) 0% =, 58.3%, 71.4%, 66.7%. < 2-21> 16.7% 16.7 8.3 58.3 28.6% 71.4 66.7% 33.3 ( ), 40.0%, 40.0%, 60.0%., 50.0%. : 39

< 2-22> 40.0% 20.0 40.0 13.3% 13.3 13.3 60.0 50.0% 50.0 ( ) < 2-7> [ ] ( ) 4 0 2 3 1 12 22 (%) 18.2 0.0 9.1 13.6 4.5 54.5 100.0 2 0 0 2 1 7 12 16.7 0.0 0.0 16.7 8.3 58.3 100.0 0 0 2 0 0 5 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 0.0 71.4 100.0 2 0 0 1 0 0 3 66.7 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 0 0 1 0 2 5 40.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 40.0 100.0 2 0 2 2 0 9 15 13.3 0.0 13.3 13.3 0.0 60.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 100.0., 12 10., 1 50.0%, 4 ~6 30.0%, 2 ~3 10.0%, 1 10.0%. Questionnaire( ) : 40

< 2-23> 10.0% 10.0 30.0 50.0 ( 1 2 3 4 6 1 ) 0% = 7 1, 1 60.0%, 66.7%, 2 ~3, 4 ~6 50.0%.. < 2-24> 20.0% 20.0 60.0 50.0% 50.0 33.3% 66.7 ( 1 2 3 4 6 1 ),,, 1. 16.7% 1, 2 ~3,. < 2-25> 33.3% 66.7 16.7% 16.7 33.3 33.3 100.0% ( 1 2 3 4 6 1 ) : 41

< 2-8> 1 2 4 7 1 3 6 1 [ ] ( ) 1 1 3 0 5 10 (%) 10.0 10.0 30.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 1 0 1 0 3 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 60.0 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 100.0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 100.0 1 1 2 0 2 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 0.0 33.3 100.0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0. 12 10., 50.0%, 20.0%, 20.0%, 10.0%. < 2-26> 10.0% 50.0 20.0 20.0 ( ) 0% =, 60.0%, 20.0%, 20.0%, 50.0%, 50.0%. 33.3%, 33.3%, 33.3%. Questionnaire( ) : 42

< 2-27> 60.0% 20.0 20.0 50.0% 50.0 33.3% 33.3 33.3 ( ),,,, 33.3%. < 2-28> 33.3% 33.3 33.3 50.0% 33.3 16.7 100.0% ( ) < 2-9> [ ] ( ) 1 5 2 2 0 10 (%) 10.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 100.0 0 3 1 1 0 5 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 1 0 1 0 3 33.3 33.3 0.0 33.3 0.0 100.0 1 1 0 1 0 3 33.3 33.3 0.0 33.3 0.0 100.0 0 3 2 1 0 6 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 0.0 100.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 : 43

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0., 10 12., 66.7%, 16.7%, 8.3%, 8.3%. 2008 : (2008 : 14), 44.0%, ( ) 32.0%. < 2-29> 16.7% 8.3 66.7 8.3 ( ) 0% = [ ] ( ) 2 0 0 0 1 8 1 12 (%) 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 66.7 8.3 100.0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 7 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 71.4 0.0 100.0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 5 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 100.0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 100.0 1 0 0 0 1 6 1 9 11.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 66.7 11.1 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 2 Questionnaire( ) : 44

., 10 12., 66.7%, 25.0%, 8.3%, 0.0%. < 2-30> 25.0% 66.7 8.3 ( ) 0% =,, 71.4%, 60.0%. < 2-31> 28.6% 71.4 20.0% 60.0 20.0 ( ), 100.0%, 55.6%, 33.3%, 11.1%. < 2-32> 100.0% 33.3% 55.6 11.1 100.0% ( ) : 45

< 2-11> [ ] ( ) 3 8 1 0 0 12 (%) 25.0 66.7 8.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 5 0 0 0 7 28.6 71.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 3 1 0 0 5 20.0 60.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 3 5 1 0 0 9 33.3 55.6 11.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0.., 77.3%, 13.6%, 9.1%. < 2-33> 9.1% 13.6 77.3 ( ),. Questionnaire( ) : 46

< 2-12> [ ] ( ) 2 3 17 22 (%) 9.1 13.6 77.3 100.0 0 2 10 12 0.0 16.7 83.3 100.0 1 0 6 7 14.3 0.0 85.7 100.0 1 1 1 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 100.0 1 2 2 5 20.0 40.0 40.0 100.0 1 1 13 15 6.7 6.7 86.7 100.0 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 : 47

5..., 3 81.8%, 2 9.1%, 3 9.1%. 1 0.0%, 1. < 2-34> ( + ) 9.1% 9.1 81.8 ( 2 3 3 ) 0% = 3 6 1, 3 75.0%, 3 16.7%, 2 8.3%, 3 85.7%, 2 14.3%. 3 100.0%. < 2-35> ( + ) 8.3% 16.7 75.0 14.3% 85.7 100.0% ( 2 3 3 ), 3 100.0%, 3 73.3%, 3 13.3%, 2 13.3%. Questionnaire( ) : 48

< 2-36> ( + ) 100.0% 13.3% 13.3 73.3 100.0% ( 2 3 3 ) < 2-13> ( + ) 3 6 1 2 3 3 [ ] ( ) 0 0 0 2 2 18 22 (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.1 81.8 100.0 0 0 0 1 2 9 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 100.0 0 0 0 1 0 6 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 0 0 2 2 11 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.3 13.3 73.3 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0., 3 72.7%, 3 9.1%, 1 9.1%, 2 4.5%, 3 4.5%. < 2-37> 9.1%9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 ( 3 1 2 3 3 ) 0% = 6 : 49

, 66.7%, 71.4%, 100.0% 3. < 2-38> 16.7% 16.7 66.7 14.3% 14.3 71.4 100.0% ( 3 1 2 3 3 ),,, 3. < 2-39> 100.0% 6.7% 13.3 6.7 13.3 60.0 100.0% ( 3 1 2 3 3 ) < 2-14> 3 6 1 2 3 3 [ ] ( ) 1 0 2 1 2 16 22 (%) 4.5 0.0 9.1 4.5 9.1 72.77 100.0 0 0 2 0 2 8 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 16.7 66.7 100.0 1 0 0 1 0 5 7 14.3 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 71.4 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.00 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.00 100.0 1 0 2 1 2 9 15 6.7 0.0 13.3 6.7 13.3 60.00 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.00 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 50

.., 1 31.8%, 22.7%, 3 18.2%, 1 18.2%, 6 9.1%. < 2-40> 22.7% 18.2 9.1 18.2 31.8 ( 3 6 1 1 ), 1 41.7%, 66.7%, 1 42.9%. < 2-41> 8.3% 33.3 8.3 8.3 41.7 42.9% 14.3 42.9 33.3% 66.7 ( 3 6 1 1 ), 1 80.0%, 26.7%, 3 1 50.0%. < 2-42> 20.0% 80.0 26.7% 20.0 13.3 20.0 20.0 50.0% 50.0 ( 3 6 1 1 ) : 51

< 2-15> 3 6 1 1 [ ] ( ) 5 4 2 4 7 22 (%) 22.7 18.2 9.1 18.2 31.8 100.0 1 4 1 1 5 12 8.3 33.3 8.3 8.3 41.7 100.0 3 0 1 3 0 7 42.9 0.0 14.3 42.9 0.0 100.0 1 0 0 0 2 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.7 100.0 1 0 0 0 4 5 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.0 100.0 4 3 2 3 3 15 26.7 20.0 13.3 20.0 20.0 100.0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 52

: 53

2

1.., 63.6%, 36.4%,. < 2-43> 36.4% 63.6 ( ), 58.3%, 41.7%, 57.1%, 42.9%. 100.0%. < 2-44> 41.7% 58.3 42.9% 57.1 100.0% ( ),,,. < 2-45> 20.0% 80.0 46.7% 53.3 100.0% ( ) : 55

< 2-16> [ ] ( ) 8 14 22 (%) 36.4 63.6 100.0 5 7 12 41.7 58.3 100.0 3 4 7 42.9 57.1 100.0 0 3 3 0.0 100.0 100.0 1 4 5 20.0 80.0 100.0 7 8 15 46.7 53.3 100.0 0 2 2 0.0 100.0 100.0. (~2009 3 ) 14 8., 3 37.5%, 3 37.5%, 1 25.0%. < 2-46> ( 2009 3 ) 25.0% 37.5 37.5 ( 1 3 3 ) 0% = 3 6 2, 3 3 40.0%, 1 33.3%, 3 33.3%, 3 33.3%. Questionnaire( ) : 56

< 2-47> ( 2009 3 ) 20.0% 40.0 40.0 33.3% 33.3 33.3 ( 1 3 3 ), 3 100.0%, 3 42.9%. < 2-48> ( 2009 3 ) 100.0% 28.6% 42.9 28.6 ( 1 3 3 ) < 2-17> ( 2009 3 ) 3 6 1 2 3 3 [ ] ( ) 0 0 2 0 3 3 8 (%) 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 37.5 37.5 100.0 0 0 1 0 2 2 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 100.0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 0 2 0 3 2 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 42.9 28.6 100.0 : 57

. 14 8., 3 ~5 50.0%, 6 ~10 25.0%, 1 ~2 12.5%, 11 ~15 12.5%, 16 0.0%. < 2-49> 12.5% 50.0 25.0 12.5 ( 1 2 3 5 6 10 11 15 ) 0% = 16, 3 ~5 60.0%, 6 ~10 20.0%, 11 ~15 20.0%, 1 ~2 33.3%, 3 ~5 33.3%, 6 ~10 33.3%. < 2-50> 60.0% 20.0 20.0 33.3% 33.3 33.3 ( 1 2 3 5 6 10 11 15 ), 3 ~5 100.0%, 3 ~5 42.9%, 6 ~10 28.6%, 1 ~2 14.3%, 11 ~15 14.3%. Questionnaire( ) : 58

< 2-51> 100.0% 14.3% 42.9 28.6 14.3 ( 1 2 3 5 6 10 11 15 ) < 2-18> 1 2 3 5 6 10 11 15 16 [ ] ( ) 1 4 2 1 0 8 (%) 12.5 50.0 25.0 12.5 0.0 100.0 0 3 1 1 0 5 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 100.0 1 1 1 0 0 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 3 2 1 0 7 14.3 42.9 28.6 14.3 0.0 100.0. 14 8., 62.5%. (, ),, 12.5%. < 2-52> 12.5% 12.5 62.5% 12.5 ( ( ) / ) 0% = : 59

, 100.0%. 40.0%, (, ),, 20.0%. < 2-53> 20.0% 20.0 40.0 20.0 100.0% ( ( ) / ), (, ) 100.0%. 71.4%, 14.3%. < 2-54> 100.0% 14.3% 71.4 14.3 ( ( ) / ) Questionnaire( ) : 60

< 2-19> ( / ) [ ] ( ) 0 1 1 5 1 0 8 (%) 0.0 12.5 12.5 62.5 12.5 0.0 100.0 0 1 1 2 1 0 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 1 5 1 0 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 0.0 100.0 2.., 3 59.1%, 2 18.2%, 3 13.6%. 3 4.5%, 1 4.5%. < 2-55> 4.5% 18.2 13.6 59.1 4.5 ( 3 1 2 3 3 ) 0% = 6, 58.3%, 42.9%, 100.0% 3. : 61

< 2-56> 8.3% 16.7 16.7 58.3 14.3% 28.6 14.3 42.9 100.0% ( 3 1 2 3 3 ), 100.0%, 40.6%, 100.0% 3. < 2-57> 100.0% 6.7% 6.7 26.7 20.0 40.6 100.0% ( 3 1 2 3 3 ) < 2-20> 3 6 1 2 3 3 [ ] ( ) 1 0 1 4 3 13 22 (%) 4.5 0.0 4.5 18.2 13.6 59.1 100.0 0 0 1 2 2 7 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 1 0 0 2 1 3 7 14.3 0.0 0.0 28.6 14.3 42.9 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 1 0 1 4 3 6 15 6.7 0.0 6.7 26.7 20.0 40.6 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 62

3.. (~2009 3 )., 1 ~10 59.1%, 11 ~20 22.7%. 18.2%. < 2-58> ( 2009 3 ) 18.2% 59.1 22.7 ( 1 10 11 20 ) 0% = 21 30 31 50 51, 100.0%, 85.7%, 58.3% 1 ~10. < 2-59> ( 2009 3 ) 58.3% 41.7 14.3% 85.7 100.0% ( 1 10 11 20 ), 1 ~10 100.0%, 73.3%, 60.0%. : 63

< 2-60> ( 2009 3 ) 60.0% 40.0 6.7% 73.3 20.0 100.0% ( 1 10 11 20 ) < 2-21> ( 2009 3 ) 1 11 21 31 51 10 20 30 50 [ ] ( ) 4 13 5 0 0 0 22 (%) 18.2 59.1 22.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 7 5 0 0 0 12 0.0 58.3 41.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 6 0 0 0 0 7 14.3 85.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 3 0 2 0 0 0 5 60.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 11 3 0 0 0 15 6.7 73.3 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0. 18., 55.6%, 3 22.2%, 1 16.7%, 6 5.6%. Questionnaire( ) : 64

< 2-61> 22.2% 5.6 16.7 55.6 ( 3 6 1 ) 0% = 1, 3 50.0%, 66.7%. < 2-62> 8.3% 8.3 16.7 66.7 50.0% 16.7 33.3 ( 3 6 1 ), 100.0%, 50.0%. 3 28.6%. < 2-63> 50.0% 50.0 28.6% 7.1 13.3 50.0 100.0% ( 3 6 1 ) : 65

< 2-22> 3 6 1 1 [ ] ( ) 4 1 3 0 10 18 (%) 22.2 5.6 16.7 0.0 55.6 100.0 1 1 2 0 8 12 8.3 8.3 16.7 0.0 66.7 100.0 3 0 1 0 2 6 50.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 33.3 100.0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 4 1 2 0 7 14 28.6 7.1 13.3 0.0 50.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 4.., 45.5%, 27.3%, 18.2%, 4.5%, 4.5%. 2008 : (2008 : 23),,, 2009. < 2-64> 45.5% 18.2 27.3 4.5 4.5 ( / ) 0% = / Questionnaire( ) : 66

0.0 0.0 0.0,,, 42.9%. < 2-65> 41.7% 25.0 25.0 8.3 42.9% 42.9 14.3 66.7% 33.3 ( / ) 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 / [ ] ( ) 10 10 4 6 0 1 0 1 22 (%) 45.5 18.2 27.3 0.0 4.5 0.0 4.5 100.0 5 3 3 0 1 0 0 12 41.7 25.0 25.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 7 42.9 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 100.0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 5 40.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 8 2 4 0 0 0 1 15 53.3 13.3 26.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 100.0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 / : 67

5. 3... 1 1, 40.9%, 27.3%, 18.2%, 9.1%, 4.5%. < 2-66> 1 9.1% 4.5 18.2 27.3 40.9 ( ) 0% =, 41.7%, 85.7%, 66.7%, 1. < 2-67> 1 8.3% 25.0 41.7 25.0 14.3% 85.7 66.7% 33.3 ( ), 40.0%, 46.7%, 50.0%. Questionnaire( ) : 68

< 2-68> 1 40.0% 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0% 33.3 46.7 50.0% 50.0 ( ) < 2-24> 1 [ ] ( ) 2 0 1 4 0 6 9 0 22 (%) 9.1 0.0 4.5 18.2 0.0 27.3 40.9 0.0 100.0 0 0 1 3 0 5 3 0 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 25.0 0.0 41.7 25.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 100.0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 66.7 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 5 40.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 0 3 0 5 7 0 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 33.3 46.7 0.0 100.0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 100.0. 2 2, 31.8%, 27.3%, 13.6%, 9.1%, 9.1%, 4.5%, 4.5%. < 2-69> 2 13.6% 4.5 27.3 4.5 31.8 9.1 9.1 ( ) 0% = : 69

, 41.7%, 28.6%, 100.0%, 2. < 2-70> 2 8.3% 41.7 25.0 8.3 16.7 28.6% 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 100.0% ( ), 80.0%, 26.7%, 50.0%. < 2-71> 2 20.0% 80.0 13.3% 6.7 26.7 6.7 20.0 13.3 13.3 50.0% 50.0 ( ) Questionnaire( ) : 70

< 2-25> 2 [ ] ( ) 0 3 1 6 1 7 2 2 22 (%) 0.0 13.6 4.5 27.3 4.5 31.8 9.1 9.1 100.0 0 1 0 5 0 3 1 2 12 0.0 8.3 0.0 41.7 0.0 25.0 8.3 16.7 100.0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 7 0.0 28.6 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 0.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 2 1 4 1 3 2 2 15 0.0 13.3 6.7 26.7 6.7 20.0 13.3 13.3 100.0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0. 3 3, 27.3%, 18.2%, 13.6%, 13.6%, 9.1%, 9.1%, 4.5%. < 2-72> 3 9.1% 4.5 18.2 27.3 13.6 9.1 13.6 4.5 ( ) 0% =, 33.3%, 66.7%, 42.9%. : 71

< 2-73> 3 8.3% 8.3 33.3 16.7 16.7 8.3 8.3 14.3% 42.9 14.3 28.6 33.3% 66.7 ( ), 60.0%, 26.7%, 50.0%. < 2-74> 3 20.0% 60.0 20.0 6.7% 26.7 20.0 20.0 13.3 6.7 6.7 50.0% 50.0 ( ) < 2-26> 3 [ ] ( ) 2 1 0 4 6 3 2 3 1 22 (%) 9.1 4.5 0.0 18.2 27.3 13.6 9.1 13.6 4.5 100.0 1 0 0 1 4 2 2 1 1 12 8.3 0.0 0.0 8.3 33.3 16.7 16.7 8.3 8.3 100.0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 7 14.3 0.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 14.3 0.0 28.6 0.0 100.0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 100.0 1 0 0 4 3 3 2 1 1 15 6.7 0.0 0.0 26.7 20.0 2.0 13.3 6.7 6.7 100.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 72

., 24.2%, 21.2%, 19.7%, 10.6%, 7.6%, 6.1%, 6.1%. < 2-75> 6.1% 6.1 3.0 21.2 10.6 24.2 19.7 7.6 1.5 ( ) : 73

3 1

1.., ( ) 45.5%, 22.7%, ( ) 18.2%, 9.1%, 4.5%. < 3-1> 22.7% 4.5 45.5 18.2 9.1 ( ( ) ( ) ) 0% =, ( ),, ( ) ( ). < 3-2> 16.7% 85.7% 100% 8.3 33.3 33.3 8.3 14.3 ( ( ) ( ) ) : 75

0.0 0.0 ) < 3-1> ( ( ) ) 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 [ ] ( ) 5 1 10 4 2 0 22 (%) 22.7 4.5 45.51 8.2 9.1 0.0 100.0 2 1 4 4 1 0 10 16.7 8.3 33.3 33.3 8.3 0.0 100.0 0 0 6 0 1 0 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 0.0 14.3 0.0 100.0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 10 4 0 0 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2.., 77.3%, 22.7%., 17 (77.3%), 72.7%, 4.5%. < 3-3> 72.7% 4.5 22.7 (... ) Questionnaire( ) : 76

, 100.0%. 83.3%, 16.7%, 75.0%, 8.3%. 100.0%.. < 3-4> 75.0% 100.0% 100.0% 8.3 16.7 (... ), 80.0%, 93.4%, 100.0%.,. < 3-5> 20.0% 80.0 86.7% 6.7 6.7 100.0% (... ) : 77

< 3-2>... [ ] ( ) 16 1 5 22 (%) 72.7 4.5 22.7 100.0 9 1 2 12 75.0 8.3 16.7 100.0 7 0 0 7 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 3 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 1 0 4 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 100.0 13 1 1 15 86.7 6.7 6.7 100.0 2 0 0 2 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 3. ( )., 21 ~30 40.9%, 31 ~40 27.3%, 20 18.2%, 41 ~50 9.1%, 50 4.5%. 2007 (2007 : 100), 2008 : (2008 : 15). 2007, 20 21 ~30 33.1%, 2008, 31 ~40 51.9%. 2009 21 ~30. Questionnaire( ) : 78

< 3-6> 2007, 2008, 2009 ( + ) 2007 2008 33.1% 25.9% 33.1 25.6 8.2 7.4 51.9 14.8 2009 18.2% 40.9 27.3 13.6 ( 20 21~30 31~40 41 ) < 3-3> 2007, 2008, 2009 ( + ) 20 21 30 31 40 41 2007 (%) 33.1 33.1 25.6 8.2 100.0 2008 (%) 25.9 7.4 51.9 14.8 100.0 2009 (%) 18.2 40.9 27.3 13.6 100.0, 66.7% 20, 50.0% 21 ~30, 57.1% 31 ~40. < 3-7> ( + ) 16.7% 28.6% 50.0 16.7 8.3 8.3 57.1 14.3 66.7% 33.3 ( 20 21 30 31 40 41 50 51 ), 20, 21 ~30. < 3-8> ( + ) 60.0% 20.0 20.0 6.7% 40.0 33.3 13.3 6.7 100.0% ( 20 21 30 31 40 41 50 51 ) : 79

< 3-4> ( + ) 20 21 30 31 40 41 50 50 [ ] ( ) 4 9 6 2 1 22 (%) 18.2 40.9 27.3 9.1 4.5 100.0 2 6 2 1 1 12 16.7 50.0 16.7 8.3 8.3 100.0 0 2 4 1 0 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 0.0 100.0 2 1 0 0 0 3 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 3 1 1 0 0 5 60.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 6 5 2 1 15 6.7 40.0 33.3 13.3 6.7 100.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4. / (2008 4 1 ~2009 3 31 )., $2,000 ~$3,000 31.8%, $1,000 ~$2,000 $4,000 ~$5,000 18.2%, $1,000 13.6%, $5,000 9.1%. < 3-9> / (2008.4.1 2009.3.31 ) 13.6% 18.2 31.8 9.1 18.2 9.1 ( 1,000 1,000 ~2,000 2,000 ~3,000 3,000 ~4,000 4,000 ~5,000 5,000 ) = $ Questionnaire( ) : 80

, $4,000 ~$5,000 66.7%, $1,000 ~$2,000 33.3%. $2,000 ~$3,000.,,. < 3-10> / (2008.4.1 2009.3.31 ) 25.0% 14.3% 16.7 41.7 16.7 28.6 28.6 28.6 33.3% 66.7 ( 1,000 1,000 ~2,000 2,000 ~3,000 3,000 ~4,000 4,000 ~5,000 5,000 ) = $, $4,000 ~$5,000 40.0%, $2,000 ~$3,000 40.0%. $2,000 ~$3,000 50.0%, $4,000 ~$5,000 50.0%. < 3-11> / (2008.4.1 2009.3.31 ) 20.0% 13.3% 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 6.7 6.7 13.3 50.0% 50.0 ( 1,000 1,000 ~2,000 2,000 ~3,000 3,000 ~4,000 4,000 ~5,000 5,000 ) = $ : 81

< 3-5> / (2008.4.1~2009.3.31 ) $ 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 $ 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 [ ] ( ) 3 4 7 2 4 2 22 (%) 13.6 18.2 31.8 9.1 18.2 9.1 100.0 3 2 5 2 0 0 12 25.0 16.7 41.7 16.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 2 0 2 2 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 0.0 28.6 28.6 100.0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 0.0 100.0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 0.0 100.0 2 3 6 1 1 2 15 13.3 20.0 40.0 6.7 6.7 13.3 100.0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 100.0 5.., 81.8%, 18.2%. < 3-12> 18.2% 81.8 ( ), 100.0%, 83.3%, 16.7%, 71.4%, 28.6%. Questionnaire( ) : 82

< 3-13> 16.7% 83.3 28.6% 100.0% 71.4 ( ),,, 50.0%. < 3-14> 100.0% 20.0% 80.0 50.0% 50.0 ( ) < 3-6> [ ] ( ) 4 18 22 (%) 18.2 81.8 100.0 2 10 12 16.7 83.3 00.0 2 5 7 28.6 71.4 100.0 0 3 3 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 5 5 0.0 100.0 100.0 3 12 15 20.0 80.0 100.0 1 1 2 50.0 50.0 100.0 : 83

.., 2 50.0%, 1 3 25.0%. < 3-15> 25.0% 50.0 25.0 ( 1 2 3 ) < 3-7> 1 2 3 [ ] ( ) 1 2 1 4 (%) 25.0 50.0 25.0 100.0 0 1 1 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 100.0 1 1 0 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 100.0 1 1 1 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 100.0 0 1 0 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0.., 50.0%, 50.0%. Questionnaire( ) : 84

< 3-16> 50.0% 50.0 ( ) 0% =,,, 100.0%., 66.7%, 33.3%.. < 3-8> [ ] ( ) 2 0 2 0 4 (%) 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 100.0 2 0 0 0 2 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 2 0 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 2 0 1 0 3 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 100.0 0 0 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 : 85

2

1. ( )., 68.5%, 18.2%, 13.6%.. 2008 : (2008 : 17), 51.7%, 37.9%, 6.9%. 3.5%. < 3-17> 2008, 2009 2008 51.7% 37.9 6.9 3.5 2009 13.6% 68.2 18.2 ( ) 0% = (2009), (2008, 2009) < 3-9> 2008, 2009 2008 (%) 51.7 37.9 6.9 3.5 0.0 100.0 2009 (%) 13.6 68.2 18.2 0.00 0.0 100.0, 83.3%, 57.1%, 66.7%. : 87

< 3-18> 8.3% 28.6% 83.3 8.3 57.1 14.3 33.3% 66.7 ( ),,,. < 3-19> 60.0% 40.0 20.0% 73.3 6.7 50.0% 50.0 ( ) < 3-10> [ ] ( ) 3 15 4 0 0 22 (%) 13.6 68.2 18.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 10 1 0 0 12 8.3 83.3 8.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 4 1 0 0 7 28.6 57.1 14.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 3 2 0 0 5 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 3 11 1 0 0 15 20.0 73.3 6.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 88

2., 54.5%, 27.3%, 18.2%.. 2008 : (2008 : 17), 46.4%, 42.9%, 10.7%, 2009. < 3-20> 2008, 2009 2008 46.4% 42.9 10.7 2009 27.3% 54.5 18.2 ( ) 0% =, < 3-11> 2008, 2009 2008 (%) 46.4 42.9 10.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 2009 (%) 27.3 54.5 18.2 0.0 0.0 100.0, 58.3%, 57.1%,,,. < 3-21> 25.0% 28.6% 58.3 16.7 57.1 14.3 33.3% 33.3 33.3 ( ) : 89

< 3-12> [ ] ( ) 6 12 4 0 0 22 (%) 27.3 54.5 18.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 3 7 2 0 0 12 25.0 58.3 16.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 4 1 0 0 7 28.6 57.1 14.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 1 1 0 0 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 2 1 0 0 5 40.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4 9 2 0 0 15 26.7 60.0 13.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 3. /., 50.0%, 27.3%, 18.2%, 4.5%. 2007 (2007 : 57) 2008 : (2008 : 17)., 2007 58.7%, 2008 53.9%. 2009 50.0%.,,,. Questionnaire( ) : 90

< 3-22> 2007, 2008, 2009 / 2007 2008 0.2% 0.9 11.7 7.7% 28.5 58.7 53.9 30.8 3.9 3.9 2009 18.2% 50.0 27.3 4.5 ( ) < 3-13> 2007, 2008, 2009 / 2007 (%) 0.2 0.9 11.7 28.5 58.7 100.0 2008 (%) 7.7 53.9 30.8 3.9 3.9 100.0 2009 (%) 0.0 18.2 50.0 27.3 4.5 100.0, / 50.0%, 57.1%, 33.3%. < 3-23> / 16.7% 50.0 25.0 8.3 14.3% 57.1 28.6 33.3% 33.3 33.3 ( ) 0% =, 53.3%, 100.0% /. 40.0% /. : 91

< 3-24> / 20.0% 20.0% 100.0% 20.0 40.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 ( ) 0% = < 3-14> / [ ] ( ) 0 4 11 6 1 22 (%) 0.0 18.2 50.0 27.3 4.5 100.0 0 2 6 3 1 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 25.0 8.3 100.0 0 1 4 2 0 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 0.0 100.0 0 1 1 1 0 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 100.0 0 1 1 2 1 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 100.0 0 3 8 4 0 15 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 0.0 100.0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.., 68.2%, 18.2%, 13.6%. 81.8%. Questionnaire( ) : 92

< 3-25> 13.6% 68.2 18.2 ( ) 0% =,,,,,. < 3-26> 8.3% 28.6% 66.7 25.0 71.4 66.7% 33.3 ( ),,,. < 3-27> 60.0% 40.0 20.0% 66.7 13.3 86.7% 13.3 ( ) : 93

< 3-15> [ ] ( ) 0 3 15 4 0 22 (%) 0.0 13.6 68.2 18.2 0.0 100.0 0 1 8 3 0 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 0.0 100.0 0 2 5 0 0 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 100.0 0 0 3 2 0 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 100.0 0 3 10 2 0 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 0.0 100.0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.., 45.5%, 36.4%, 13.6%, 4.5%.. 2008 : (2008 : 17), 70.0%, 16.7%, ' ' 13.3%.. < 3-28> 2008, 2009 2008 16.7% 70.0 13.3 2009 13.6% 36.4 45.5 4.5 ( ) Questionnaire( ) : 94

< 3-16> 2008, 2009 2008 (%) 16.7 70.0 13.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 2009 (%) 13.6 36.4 45.5 4.5 0.0 100.0, 66.7%, 42.9%, ' 41.7%., 33.3%, 14.3%, 8.3%. < 3-29> 8.3% 14.3% 41.7 41.7 8.3 42.9 42.9 33.3% 66.7 ( ) 0% = < 3-17> [ ] ( ) 3 8 10 1 0 22 (%) 13.6 36.4 45.5 4.5 0.0 100.0 1 5 5 1 0 12 8.3 41.7 41.7 8.3 0.0 100.0 1 3 3 0 0 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 0 2 0 0 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 1 3 0 0 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 5 7 10 1 5 13.3 33.3 46.7 6.7 0.0 100.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 : 95

6.., ( ) 31.8%. 13.6%, 9.1%, 4.5%. < 3-30> 9.1% 31.8 13.6 31.8 9.1 4.5 ( ( ) ), 41.7%, 33.3% ( ). 42.9%. < 3-31> 41.7% 14.3% 16.7 25.0 16.7 14.3 14.3 42.9 14.3 33.3% 33.3 33.3 ( ( ) ),,, ( ). Questionnaire( ) : 96

< 3-32> 20.0% 6.7% 26.7 40.0 40.0 20.0 26.7 13.3 6.7 50.0% 50.0 ( ( ) ) < 3-18> ( ) [ ] ( ) 2 7 3 7 2 1 22 (%) 9.1 31.8 13.6 31.8 9.1 4.5 100.0 0 5 2 3 2 0 12 0.0 41.7 16.7 25.0 16.7 0.0 100.0 1 1 1 3 0 1 7 14.3 14.3 14.3 42.9 0.0 14.3 100.0 1 1 0 1 0 0 3 33.3 33.3 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 2 0 2 0 0 5 20.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 4 3 4 2 1 15 6.7 26.7 20.0 26.7 13.3 6.7 100.0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 : 97

4 1

1. ( )., 63.6%, 36.4%. < 4-1> ( / ) 63.6% 36.4 ( ), 71.4%, 66.7%, 58.3%. < 4-2> ( / ) 58.3% 41.7 71.4% 66.7% 33.3 28.6 ( ), 100.0%, 66.7%., 40.0%, 60.0% ' '. : 99

< 4-3> ( / ) 40.0% 60.0 66.7% 33.3 100.0% ( ) < 4-1> ( / ) [ ] ( ) 14 8 22 (%) 63.6 36.4 100.0 7 5 12 58.3 41.7 100.0 5 2 7 71.4 28.6 100.0 2 1 3 66.7 33.3 100.0 2 3 5 40.0 60.0 100.0 10 5 15 66.7 33.3 100.0 2 0 2 100.0 0.0 100.0 2. ( ).,. Questionnaire( ) : 100

. ( )., 28.6%, 21.4%, ' 14.3%, ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ' 7.1%. < 4-4> 7.1% 7.1 21.4 7.1 28.6 7.1 14.3 7.1 ( ), 28.6%, 60.0%, 50.0%. < 4-5> 14.3% 20.0% 14.3 14.3 14.3 28.6 14.3 20.0 60.0 50.0% 50.0 ( ) : 101

< 4-2> : [ ] ( ) 1 1 3 1 4 1 2 1 14 (%) 7.1 7.1 21.4 7.1 28.6 7.1 14.3 7.1 100.0 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 0.0 14.3 14.3 28.6 14.3 100.0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 1 0 4 1 2 1 10 0.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 40.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 100.0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0. ( )., 42.9%, 21.4%, 14.3%, 14.3%, 7.1%. < 4-6> 42.9% 21.4 14.3 7.1 14.3 ( ), 28.6%, 60.0%, 100.0%. Questionnaire( ) : 102

< 4-7> 14.3% 60.0% 100.0% 28.6 14.3 14.3 28.6 20.0 20.0 ( ) < 4-3> : [ ] ( ) 6 3 2 1 2 14 (%) 42.9 21.4 14.3 7.1 14.3 100.0 1 2 1 1 2 7 14.3 28.6 14.3 14.3 28.6 100.0 3 1 1 0 0 5 60.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4 2 1 1 2 10 40.0 20.0 10.0 10.0 20.0 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 3. ( )., 1 ~2 2 ~3 28.6%, 1 21.4%, 6 14.3%, 4 ~5 7.1%. < 4-8> 28.6% 21.4 28.6 7.1 14.3 ( 1~2 1 2~3 4~5 6 ) : 103

< 4-4> 1~2 1 2~3 4~5 6 [ ] ( ) 4 3 4 1 2 14 (%) 28.6 21.4 28.6 7.1 14.3 100.0 4. ( )., ( ) 64.3%, 21.4%, 14.3%. < 4-9> 21.4% 14.3 64.3 ( ( ) ) 0% =, 50.0%., ( ) 100.0%, 57.1%. 28.6%. < 4-10> 28.6% 100.0% 14.3 57.1 50.0% 50.0 ( ( ) ) Questionnaire( ) : 104

, 100.0%, 70.0% ( ), 50.0%, 50.0%. < 4-11> 50.0% 50.0 20.0% 100% 10.0 70.0 ( ( ) ) < 4-5> ( ) [ ] ( ) 3 0 2 9 14 (%) 21.4 0.0 14.3 64.3 100.0 2 0 1 4 7 28.6 0.0 14.3 57.1 100.0 0 0 0 5 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 1 0 1 0 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 100.0 1 0 1 0 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 100.0 2 0 1 7 10 20.0 0.0 10.0 70.0 100.0 0 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 : 105

5. ( )., 42.9%, 35.7%, 14.3%, 7.1%. (78.6%). < 4-12> 14.3% 35.7 42.9 7.1 ( ) 0% =, 42.9%.. < 4-13> 28.6% 40.0% 28.6 42.9 40.0 20.0 50.0% 50.0 ( ),, ',. Questionnaire( ) : 106

< 4-14> 50.0% 20.0% 100% 50.0 40.0 30.0 10.0 ( ) < 4-6> [ ] ( ) 2 5 6 0 1 14 (%) 14.3 35.7 42.9 0.0 7.1 100.0 2 2 3 0 0 7 28.6 28.6 42.9 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 2 2 0 1 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 20.0 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 4 3 0 1 10 20.0 40.0 30.0 0.0 10.0 100.0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 : 107

2

1.., 54.5%, 45.5%. < 4-15> 45.5% 54.5 ( ), 71.4%., '. < 4-16> 41.7% 58.3 71.4% 100.0% 28.6 ( ), 53.3%. 80.0%, 20.0%. < 4-17> 20.0% 80.0 53.3% 46.7 50.0% 50.0 ( ) : 109

< 4-7> [ ] ( ) 10 12 22 (%) 45.5 54.5 100.0 5 7 12 41.7 58.3 100.0 5 2 7 71.4 28.6 100.0 0 3 3 0.0 100.0 100.0 1 4 5 20.0 80.0 100.0 8 7 15 53.3 46.7 100.0 1 1 2 50.0 50.0 100.0 2.,., 45.5%, 36.4%, 18.2%,, 54.5%. < 4-18> 18.2% 36.4 45.5 ( ), 50.0%, 100.0%, 71.4%. Questionnaire( ) : 110

< 4-19> 25.0% 14.3% 100.0% 25.0 50.0 71.4 14.3 ( ), 100.0%, 46.7%, 50.0%, 50.0%. < 4-20> 100.0% 26.7% 46.7 26.7 50.0% 50.0 ( ) < 4-8> [ ] ( ) 4 8 10 22 (%) 18.2 36.4 45.5 100.0 3 3 6 12 25.0 25.0 50.0 100.0 1 5 1 7 14.3 71.4 14.3 100.0 0 0 3 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 0 5 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 4 7 4 15 26.7 46.7 26.7 100.0 0 1 1 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 100.0 : 111

3.,., 86.4%, 9.1%, 4.5%,. < 4-21>, 9.1% 86.4 4.5 ( ),,,. 28.6%. < 4-22>, 91.7% 28.6% 71.4 100.0% 8.3 ( ),,,. < 4-23>, 100.0% 13.3% 80.0 6.7 100.0% ( ) Questionnaire( ) : 112

< 4-9>, [ ] ( ) 2 19 1 22 (%) 9.1 86.4 4.5 100.0 0 11 1 12 0.0 91.7 8.3 100.0 2 5 0 7 28.6 71.4 0.0 100.0 0 3 0 3 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0 5 0 5 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 2 12 1 15 13.3 80.0 6.7 100.0 0 2 0 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 4., 72.7%, 27.3%. < 4-24> 27.3% 72.7 ( ),,,. : 113

< 4-25> 25.0% 75.0 42.9% 57.1 100.0% ( ),,,. < 4-26> 20.0% 80.0 33.3% 66.7 100.0% ( ) < 4-10> [ ] ( ) 6 16 22 (%) 27.3 72.7 100.0 3 9 12 25.0 75.0 100.0 3 4 7 42.9 57.1 100.0 0 3 3 0.0 100.0 100.0 1 4 5 20.0 80.0 100.0 5 10 15 33.3 66.7 100.0 0 2 2 0.0 100.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 114

: 115

5 1

1.., 50.0%. 30 22.7%, 40 22.7%, 30.. < 5-1> 22.7% 22.7 50.0 4.5 ( 30 40 ) 0% = 20, 30, 30, 58.3%, 100.0%, 30 42.9%.. < 5-2> 16.7% 42.9% 100.0% 25.0 58.3 28.6 14.3 14.3 ( 30 40 ) : 117

, 100.0%. 30 42.9%, 26.7%. < 5-3> 100.0% 33.3% 100.0% 33.3 26.7 6.7 ( 30 40 ) < 5-1> 20 30 30 30 40 [ ] ( ) 0 0 0 5 5 11 1 22 (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.7 22.7 50.0 4.5 100.0 0 0 0 2 3 7 0 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 0.0 100.0 0 0 0 3 2 1 1 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.9 28.6 14.3 14.3 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 0 5 5 4 1 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 33.3 26.7 6.7 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 118

2. 3... 1 1, 50.0%, 31.8%, 9.1%, 9.1%, 1. < 5-4> 1 31.8% 50.0 9.1 9.1 ( ) 0% =,, 66.7%, 57.1%, 41.7%. 42.9%, 33.3%, 25.0%. < 5-5> 1 25.0% 42.9% 41.7 16.7 16.7 57.1 33.3% 66.7 ( ) : 119

,, 1. < 5-6> 1 20.0% 26.7% 100.0% 60.0 20.0 53.3 6.7 13.3 ( ) < 5-2> 1 [ ] ( ) 7 11 2 2 0 0 22 (%) 31.8 50.0 9.1 9.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 3 5 2 2 0 0 12 25.0 41.7 16.7 16.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 3 4 0 0 0 0 7 42.9 57.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 3 1 0 0 0 5 20.0 60.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4 8 1 2 0 0 15 26.7 53.3 6.7 13.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0. 2 2,,, 22.7%. 18.2%, 13.6%. Questionnaire( ) : 120

< 5-7> 2 22.7% 22.7 18.2 13.6 22.7 ( ) 0% =, 33.3%, 42.9%, 28.6%.,, 33.3%. < 5-8> 2 33.3% 16.7 8.3 8.3 33.3 14.3% 42.9 28.6 14.3 33.3% 33.3 33.3 ( ),,,,., 50.0%. < 5-9> 2 20.0% 40.0 20.0 20.0 26.7% 26.7 13.3 6.7 26.7 50.0% 50.0 ( ) : 121

< 5-3> 2 [ ] ( ) 5 5 4 3 5 0 22 (%) 22.7 22.7 18.2 13.6 22.7 0.0 100.0 4 2 1 1 4 0 12 33.3 16.7 8.3 8.3 33.3 0.0 100.0 1 3 2 1 0 0 7 14.3 42.9 28.6 14.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 100.0 1 0 2 1 1 0 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 100.0 4 4 2 1 4 0 15 26.7 26.7 13.3 6.7 26.7 0.0 100.0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0. 3 3, 31.8%, 22.7%, 18.2%, 13.6%. < 5-10> 3 18.2% 4.5 22.7 31.8 13.6 9.1 ( ) 0% =, 33.3%, 42.9%, 66.7%. Questionnaire( ) : 122

< 5-11> 3 33.3% 8.3 16.7 16.7 25.0 28.6% 42.9 28.6 33.3% 66.7 ( ), 60.0%, 26.7%, 50.0%. < 5-12> 3 20.0% 20.0 60.0 26.7% 26.7 20.0 13.3 13.3 50.0% 50.0 ( ) < 5-4> 3 [ ] ( ) 4 1 5 7 3 0 2 22 (%) 18.2 4.5 22.7 31.8 13.6 0.0 9.1 100.0 4 1 2 2 3 0 0 12 33.3 8.3 16.7 16.7 25.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 42.9 0.0 0.0 28.6 100.0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4 0 4 3 2 0 2 15 26.7 0.0 26.7 20.0 13.3 0.0 13.3 100.0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 : 123

., 25.8%, 24.2%, 18.2%, 16.7%, 12.1%. 2008,,,,,. < 5-13> 24.2% 25.8 16.7 18.2 12.1 3.0 ( ) 0% = < 5-5> [ ] ( ) 16 17 11 12 8 0 2 66 (%) 24.2 25.8 16.7 18.2 12.1 0.0 3.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 124

3.., 63.6%, 36.4%. < 5-14> 63.6% 36.4 ( ), 85.7%, 66.7%, 50.0%.. < 5-15> 50.0% 50.0 85.7% 14.3 66.7% 33.3 ( ), 100.0%, 66.7%, 40.0%.. : 125

< 5-16> 40.0% 60.0 66.7% 100.0% 33.3 ( ) < 5-6> [ ] ( ) 14 8 22 (%) 63.6 36.4 100.0 6 6 12 50.0 50.0 100.0 6 1 7 85.7 14.3 100.0 2 1 3 66.7 33.3 100.0 2 3 5 40.0 60.0 100.0 10 5 15 66.7 33.3 100.0 2 0 2 100.0 0.0 100.0 4.., (59.0%) (41.0%). < 5-17> 59.0% 41.0 ( ) Questionnaire( ) : 126

,,, 85.7%, 66.7%. < 5-18> 50.0% 50.0 85.7% 14.3 33.3% 66.7 ( ),, 80.0%. < 5-19> 20.0% 80.0 66.7% 100.0% 33.3 ( ) : 127

< 5-7> [ ] ( ) 13 9 22 (%) 59.0 41.0 100.0 6 6 12 50.0 50.0 100.0 6 1 7 85.7 14.3 100.0 1 2 3 33.3 66.7 100.0 1 4 5 20.0 80.0 100.0 10 5 15 66.7 33.3 100.0 2 0 2 100.0 0.0 100.0 5.., 72.7% 27.3%,. < 5-20> 72.7% 27.3 ( ), 100.0%, 66.7%. (66.7%) (33.3%). Questionnaire( ) : 128

< 5-21> 66.7% 100.0% 33.3 33.3% 66.7 ( ),,,. < 5-22> 60.0% 40.0 73.3% 26.7 100.0% ( ) < 5-8> [ ] ( ) 16 6 22 (%) 72.7 27.3 100.0 8 4 12 66.7 33.3 100.0 7 0 7 100.0 0.0 100.0 1 2 3 33.3 66.7 100.0 3 2 5 60.0 40.0 100.0 11 4 15 73.3 26.7 100.0 2 0 2 100.0 0.0 100.0 : 129

6.,, 72.7%. < 5-23> 72.7% 27.3 ( ),,,.,,,. < 5-9> [ ] ( ) 16 6 22 (%) 72.7 27.3 100.0 7 5 12 58.3 41.7 100.0 6 1 7 85.7 14.3 100.0 3 0 3 100.0 0.0 100.0 4 1 5 80.0 20.0 100.0 10 5 15 66.7 33.3 100.0 2 0 2 100.0 0.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 130

: 131

2

1. CTFD, DTRC. CTFD / DTRC Career Transition for Dancers (CTFD) Dancer Transition Resource Center(DTRC)., 54.5%, 45.5%. < 5-24> CTFD / DTRC 54.5% 45.5 ( ),,,.. < 5-25> CTFD / DTRC 33.3% 66.7 71.4% 28.6 100.0% ( ) : 133

,,. < 5-26> CTFD / DTRC 80.0% 20.0 40.0% 100.0% 60.0 ( ) < 5-10> CTFD / DTRC [ ] ( ) 12 10 22 (%) 54.5 45.5 100.0 4 8 12 33.3 66.7 100.0 5 2 7 71.4 28.6 100.0 3 0 3 100.0 0.0 100.0 4 1 5 80.0 20.0 100.0 6 9 15 40.0 60.0 100.0 2 0 2 100.0 0.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 134

. CTFD / DTRC Career Transition for Dancers (CTFD) Dancer Transition Resource Center(DTRC) CTFD DTRC., 58.3%, 42.7%. < 5-27> CTFD / DTRC 41.7% 58.3 ( ),, CTFD DTRC, 50.0%. < 5-28> CTFD / DTRC 50.0% 50.0 40.0% 60.0 33.3% 66.7 ( ),.,. : 135

< 5-29> CTFD / DTRC 50.0% 50.0 33.3% 66.7 50.0% 50.0 ( ) < 5-11> CTFD / DTRC [ ] ( ) 5 7 12 (%) 41.7 58.3 100.0 2 2 4 50.0 50.0 100.0 2 3 5 40.0 60.0 100.0 1 2 3 33.3 66.7 100.0 2 2 4 50.0 50.0 100.0 2 4 6 33.3 66.7 100.0 1 1 2 50.0 50.0 100.0. CTFD / DTRC CTFD DTRC CTFD DTRC., CTFD DTRC. Questionnaire( ) : 136

< 5-12> CTFD / DTRC [ ] ( ) 0 5 5 (%) 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 2 2 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 2 2 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 1 1 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 2 2 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 2 2 0.0 100.0 100.0 0 1 1 0.0 100.0 100.0 2. ( ) (Dancer s Career Development Center: DCDC)., 45.5%, 27.3%, 27.3%. (55.5%) ( ). 2007 61.3%, 10.8% (2007 : 183), ( ). < 5-30> ( ) 45.5% 27.3 27.3 ( ) : 137

< 5-13> 2007, 2009 ( ) 2007 (%) 61.3 27.9 10.8 100.0 2009 (%) 45.5 27.3 27.3 100.0 3. ( ). ( )., 54.5%, 40.9%, 4.5%. < 5-31> ( ) 54.5% 40.9 4.5 ( ) 0% =,, 71.4%, 66.7%, 41.7%. < 5-32> ( ) 41.7% 71.4% 50.0 8.3 28.6 66.7% 33.3 ( ) Questionnaire( ) : 138

,,,. < 5-33> ( ) 80.0% 20.0 46.7% 46.7 6.7 50.0% 50.0 ( ) < 5-14> ( ) [ ] ( ) 12 9 1 0 0 22 (%) 54.5 40.9 4.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 5 6 1 0 0 12 41.7 50.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 5 2 0 0 0 7 71.4 28.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 1 0 0 0 3 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4 1 0 0 0 5 80.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 7 7 1 0 0 15 46.7 46.7 6.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0. ( )., 81.8%, 18.2%. : 139

< 5-34> ( ) 81.8% 18.2 ( ) 0% =,,, 100.0%, 75.0%, 66.7%. < 5-35> ( ) 75.0% 100.0% 66.7% 33.3 25.0 ( ),,,. < 5-36> ( ) 80.0% 80.0% 100.0% 20.0 20.0 ( ) Questionnaire( ) : 140

< 5-15> ( ) [ ] ( ) 18 4 0 0 0 22 (%) 81.8 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 9 3 0 0 0 12 75.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 7 0 0 0 0 7 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 1 0 0 0 3 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4 1 0 0 0 5 80.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 12 3 0 0 0 15 80.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0. ( )., 59.1%, 36.4%, 4.5%. < 5-37> ( ) 59.1% 36.4 4.5 ( ) 0% =,, 66.7%, 58.3%, 57.1%. : 141

< 5-38> ( ) 58.3% 33.3 8.3 57.1% 42.9 66.7% 33.3 ( ),,,. < 5-39> ( ) 80.0% 20.0 46.7% 46.7 6.7 100.0% ( ) < 5-16> ( ) [ ] ( ) 13 8 1 0 0 22 (%) 59.13 6.4 4.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 7 4 1 0 0 12 58.3 33.3 8.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 4 3 0 0 0 7 57.1 42.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 1 0 0 0 3 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4 1 0 0 0 5 80.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 7 7 1 0 0 15 46.7 46.7 6.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Questionnaire( ) : 142

Interview 글 : 윤성주

in Las Vegas Sun Ho Kim and Dancers Roxey Contemporary Ballet Atlanta Ballet Ex. American Ballet Theatre Studio Company Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater American Ballet Theater Ong Dance Company, Ong Dance School Yoo and Dancers in Las Vegas LeeSaar the Company, LDP New York Theatre Ballet Koresh Dance Company Helen Simoneau Dance Company, SIWIC Dance Ensemble

America United States of Moonea Choi & Dancers Ko-Ryo Dance Theater Trisha Brown Dance Company Cedarlake Contemporary Ballet Company Da Da Dance Project Complexions Contemporary Ballet Pittsburgh Ballet Theater, Pittsburgh Ballet School

/ Rosalie O Connor / The Father( ) / / Raul Melendez / (Don Quixote) / Charlie McCullers / (Romeo & Juliet) /

Kwak Ballet Academy in Las Vegas 1970, 1998 2008. (Nevada Ballet Theatre) & 1995 1998. (Seoul Ballet Theatre) 1993. (Krov) 1988 1995. (Universal Ballet Company) 1992. 1989.

2009 7 7,.... 1988 UBC, 93, 95. 8, SBT 3 98 Nevada Ballet Theatre Bruce Steivel..,., O1. O1.. 9/11..,,?.. : 149

.. Nevada Ballet Theatre. Nevada Ballet Theatre 25, 7. 40 6~7, Nevada Ballet Theatre., 1, 2,.. Nevada Ballet Theatre,.... Nevada Ballet Theatre.. Nevada Ballet Theatre.,.. 80,. : 150

,..,. 5 2.... 5....... Nevada Ballet Theatre. 1 3. 5-6 8.. 4~5.., 1.. : 151

. O1..,,,,.. O1, 1, 1 30 42, 48, 2~3. 1, 2. O1,. O1...,...,., 10... : 152

,......,...?,.., (Nevada Ballet Theatre Solist )..... 10. : 153

...?. Nevada Ballet Theatre.......... 10..,...?,. : 154

,!. 7.. : 155

Sun Ho Kim and Dancers Raul Melendez 1970, 2003. (The Metropolitan Opera Ballet) / 2001. (New York City Opera Dance Company) / 1997 2000. (Boston Dance Collective) & (Prometheus Dance Company) 2007. (Minesota Opera) 2006, 2007. (Opera Colorado) 2005, 2007. (Boston Lyric Opera) 2009. (Boston College) (University of Massachusetts Boston) (Boston University) 1996. (The Boston Conservatory) (MFA) 1991. (BA)

2009 7 15, 90,,, (,, ), MBC!,, 1994,.. 2 3. 9,,. Raul Melendez The Boston Conservatory.,, 1.,. Boston Dance Collective Trisha Brown Dance Company,, Prometheus Dance Company,. 3. 2000 Joyce Soho : 157

Joyce Soho Presents. 2002 Sun Ho Kim and Dancers..,,.. 11, 1...,... The Metropolitan Opera Ballet New York City Opera Dance Company. John Adams Nixon in China 25, Boston Lyric Opera, Minnesota Opera, Opera Colorado. 1 26,. : 158

.,,.(.).., 1 Practical Training H1 ( ) Boston Dance Collective. H1. (1 30 ) 15, 12,,. 67 3, 4 Boston College, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston University. Cambridge School of Weston.....,,, : 159

. Extraordinary Ability Alien 2, 5 5...?,,.,.??.,,.,,..?,...,... : 160

.. 15,,?.,,...,..,,,.,,. 50 20, 8,.,. Boston Dance Collective 60. 3 60 : 161

., 3,......,. 70. 90. Prometheus Dance Company. 3,..,., Doug Varone, Sean Curran, Dawn Kramer, David Dorfman, Terry Creach. Doug Varone 96. Doug Varone, Anna Sokolow,. 2000 : 162

Les Troyens Doug Varone. Sean Curran 80 90, Nixon in China. 45,., 26.. 90 2000 A 500., 1200-1400, ( ). 300, 500.. Equity. AGMA American Guild of Musical Artists. I.M.G,, 2000 10. AGMA. AGMA... 4,.? : 163

.,,,?.,.,. 10?.,..,... ( ),., 80.. Petricia Donegan / Haiku Mind : 164

,..,.,.,,,,,.?,?,,,., 20....,? : 165

4, 5,..,,,... 2,,,.!?...,.?...,.,,..?,., : 166

,,.,.,,,. : 167

Ajkun Ballet Theater/Roxey Contemporary Ballet 1979, 2007. 2005. 1998. 2009. (Albania National Opera Ballet Theater) 2008. (Baltimore Ballet), 2008. (Albany Berkshire Ballet) 2004. 2 1997. 7 2009. Dance in ITALY Festival <The Dying Lover> 2006. 7 Dance 2000 Festival <Identity>

2009 5 20,. 2007 2 3 (Ajkun Ballet Theater). O1 3...... ( ) Ajkun Ballet Theater Roxey Contemporary Ballet.. Roxey Contemporary Ballet 3,. Ajkun Ballet Theater,..,... Roxey Contemporary Ballet, Roxey. Roxey Style. Roxey Contemporary Ballet Ajkun Ballet Theater : 169

Roxey Contemporary Ballet.. Roxey Contemporary Ballet,.,,. Ajkun Ballet Theater...,... Ajkun Ballet Theater 3, Roxey Contemporary Ballet. Ajkun Ballet Theater Roxey.... : 170

. ( )?...,,......,,...., Ajkun Ballet Theater,.,. : 171

,..?................,, : 172

?!,? : 173

Atlanta Ballet Charlie McCullers 1982, 2007. 2004. 1997 2000. 2000. 1 1999. 7 1999. 30

2009 8 21, 2005,, 2, 3. 20 (Atlanta Ballet). 110, 1, 2 2006 6,. 2009 9 Atlanta Ballet.,. (Sharon Story) Charlie McCullers, Atlanta Ballet (John Mcfall)......,.,. : 175

Atlanta Ballet..,., 10, 12, 2, 5. 30. Atlanta,. Atlanta, 4. Fox CobbEnergy Art Center Atlanta.. ( ), Michael Pink, Darrell Grand moultrie, 3 ABT lauri Stallings, Christopher Hampson.. Atlanta Ballet....,., : 176

...... Atlanta Ballet bar center 20 120., 3.,.. 9 5 1.,.... Atlanta Ballet AGMA( ),. 700, 1300.,,,, MBA. -, : 177

.. ( )....,,...,,..,.,. : 178

.,,..,.....,..,.....,., : 179

,,.,.,.,..,..,.?!....... : 180

: 181

American Ballet Theatre Studio Company Rosalie O Connor 1989, 2007. 2003 2006. 2007. American Ballet Theatre Studio Company(N.Y.) 2007. ( ) 2006. (Senior/ ) 2006. Jackson(Junior/ ) 2005. ( / )

2009 4 30,.,,.. ABT(American Ballet Theater). 3 ABT., 10., 17~18 ( ). Rosalie O Connor. 17. ABT.,. 3~4..,.., 1. $700..., 4~5 : 183

.,,,,....... 32, ( ),,,... 2.,,... ABT, ( ),.., ( ),. ABT- 2( ),. 8, 80~90, 16~20 young 12~14,.,,,,. : 184

ABT ( ),..,,.. 9 7. 1.,...??. 1.,.,,.,.,.. ABT.,,.,,,,... : 185

.,. ABT.,,.. 6, 1 30. ABT?. 1:1., ( ) 5.. 1 ( ) 2. ~ 10,., (O1)...,...,.,, : 186

...,,,...........,,.. 5 6. 5 18, 7 8 ABT ABT. ABT. 2~3. 21,!. : 187

.?..,..?,.,,......,,,,.......,,.. : 188

,.? : 189

Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater 1983, 2006. 2002. 2009. 3 Alvin Ailey II 2006. 7 Alvin Ailey School 2009 6 1 2001

2009 7 7,... Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater 2007,. Alvin Ailey.. Alvin Ailey?. 2,. Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater. Alvin Ailey. Alvin Ailey 98% 2%,. Alvin Ailey Second Company First Company : 191

. Second Company. Second Company. Alvin Ailey 1 Second Company 1 Second Company. Second Company,......,...,,..,. How are you? Good!. I m tired Not bad!. : 192

Good Good!.., 3... 6...., $150,, $150~$180, 250,.. Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater. Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater. 98%....., Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater, 6.... : 193

. (Revelation).. 1.., 10 12 6. 7 9, 18 9 fall tour. Second Company,,, 2 (,, ). Alvin Ailey. First Company 12, 1.,. 4..?. : 194

. Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater..... 2.. Second Company First Company 1. 1.... First Company. First Company... 3... Second Company 2,. Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater,., 27,,.., : 195

.. Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater.?.........,..?.. 6....., 1., : 196

..... First Company 44.. Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater..?.?..,,..,......... : 197

.,,,,,... 7 1.. 7 6 12,, 2. First Company. First Company..,......,,,,,....,.,. : 198

......... : 199

/ Prima / LeeSaar the Company / Brook Notary

/ Robert Gullen Photography / Sealed in Stone / / Tom Bower

American Ballet Theater 1979, 1992 1998. 1991. 2004. 2002. 1998.

2009 5 27,....... 1,,.,, 2002 1, UBC. ABT American Ballet Theater. ABT.?,.. ABT..,,,,. 4. ABT, 1.,. : 203

. 5 8. 10 6 8. ABT..... ABT..,. 10 15 1, 12 7. 3 1. 5..,. ABT 9 3, 4.. O1.. 6. 1, 2 off weeks,,.?. : 204

.. 1, 2.. (5 ). 1 8, 5 8, 1.,,. ABT 2... 7, 6.... 79. 28.. 11 19, 20.. : 205

.?..........?...... : 206

: 207

OngDance Company/School (OngDance Company) (OngDance School) 1972, 2001. 1996. 1996 2002. 2009. 2005. 1995. 25

2009 6 18,.. l.. 2005 2006, 20. 1., OngDance Company Outstanding achievement in Performance( )...,., Asian OngDance Company. 11. : 209

., 600 11. 30,,,,..,,,.,,.,...... 6. 30......,. OngDance Company. : 210

1,.,.,,,,,.,........ 3, 4 150~200....... 30,, Oakland Asian Cultural Center 1. 1, 2.. 2,.. : 211

..,,,,.. University of California at Berkeley,..?... 30.?,.,..,..,,... : 212

,.,.,, 7,,.. 1. National Dance Week,..,,,,.,,........ OngDance Company. 2. Korean Traditional Dance Company : 213

OngDance Company.,,.. 5. 5.. 2 5,..,.. People like me Ethnic Dance Festival.......?... : 214

,,....?.,........ 1,000,.. ( )?. : 215

5~10 100....?.... OngDance Company..... OngDance Company..,. 10 1. 10 ( ) (2007~2011),,,,, ( ) 6 ( 6H),,. 1 : 216

,.......,?..... UCLA....,. LA.. OngDance Company... : 217

........,...?.......!. : 218

: 219

Yoo and Dancers 1968, 2009. (NYU) 1991. 2002. (California Ballet Company) 2001. (San Diego City Ballet) 1998. (Canberra Dance Theater) 1994. (Kirov) 2008. Second Avenue Dance Company Fade 2008. Tisch Dance We Are Momentarily Delayed 2008. Grupo Corpo

2009 8 4, s 1992 93 (kirov).. 1, 96 (Canberra Dance Theater),. 2000 (San Diego City Ballet) 1, (California Ballet Company) 2.. (Tulane University) 2004 3. 2007 (NYU) 2,. 11 (Yoo and Dancers), 9 12..... sink or swim... Canberra Dance Theater Meryl Tankard : 221

, Australian Dance Company Stephanie Burridge,.. San Diego City Ballet. California Ballet Company 30. (Sonia Arova)... California Ballet Company 9 2 3. -..?...,.?. 1 2, 3 4. 12 : 222

. 12 1. 9. 2 9. 9 5 1, 6, 7, 8.., 12 1.,,,. Trisha Brown Dance Company.. 10, San Diego City Ballet 200~250, 1000, California Ballet Company 250,.. Merce Cunningham Dance Company. ABT 600, 3500.?..,,... : 223

,. Grupo Corpo Dance Company.,,....,..... 3?,....,, : 224

..................... : 225

Kwak Ballet Academy in Las Vegas 1969, 1988., 2003 2008. (Nevada Ballet Theatre) 1999. (Nevada Ballet Theatre) 1991. (Kirov Ballet Academy) 1988 1999. 1991.

2009 5 27, (UBC) 11. ( ) (SBT) (Nevada Ballet Theatre). 1 Nevada Ballet Theatre. UBC 11. UBC Nevada Ballet Theatre, 1, 10 Nevada Ballet Theatre 21. O1... UBC Nevada Ballet Theatre., Nevada Ballet Theatre. 1999, 29. 29..,,,,. UBC., 98 1. Nevada : 227

Ballet Theatre,.,. 1,.. O1 ( ). Nevada Ballet Theatre,..,.,........?.. : 228

. UBC..........., 10. Nevada Ballet Theatre. 1 5... 1 1.. Nevada Ballet Theatre...,... 1. 1. 1. O1.. : 229

. Nevada Ballet Theatre.,,, 6.,,,,.?,..,...,... 3,. : 230

?. 40... 33 7 40... : 231

LeeSaar the Company/LDP LDP LeeSaar the Company 1983, 2007. 2004. 2008., GENEVA SESSIONS 2008 2007. <MOMENT> 2006. <the cloud>

2009 5 4,.... LDP...,. 6, 10 LeeSaar the Company.. 2009 3. 1 2 O1.....,... LeeSaar the Company 2000 Lee saar. Lee Saar... LeeSaar the Company, 40, 20. saar : 233

Lee.....,,.. LeeSaar the Company JCC........ 1, 2. LeeSaar the Company 1 2009..... : 234

,,..?........, 11 Prima..,,....?.,... : 235

New York Theatre Ballet 1983, 2005. 2000. 2006 2008. Roxy Ballet Company 2006 2007. 2005 2006.

2009 6 17,. 1,. 2006 1, 9 (New York Theatre Ballet) 5. New York Theatre Ballet, (Roxey Contemporary Ballet). Roxey Contemporary Ballet.,. Roxey Contemporary Ballet,.. 30.... 24.. 20. : 237

?. Roxey Contemporary Ballet..... New York Theatre Ballet ABT.,,,. 12,, 30.. New York Theatre Ballet,. New York Theatre Ballet.. 9 10 15, 10 4. 30 : 238

. 4. 2, 3. 15~17,,... Roxey Contemporary Ballet. New York Theatre Ballet 5. 9 5 1 5............ : 239

.,,,.?.,...,......,....,,? : 240

: 241

Koresh Dance Company Cheryl Mann Photography 1975, 2001. The University of the Arts in Philadelphia 1994. 2004 2007. River North Dance Company 2002 2004. Sarasota Ballet of Florida 2001. Shapiro and Smith Dance Company 1997 1998. San Diego Dance Theatre 2008. Cavalier in Sugar Plum pas de deux with Brandywine Ballet Company 2004 2005. Snow Prince in Snow pas de deux with Civic Ballet of Chicago

2009 7 29, 2 1 1995.. 1.,, 1. Cheryl Mann Photography 1, 97 San Diego Dance Theatre 1, 98, The University of the Arts in Philadelphia. 1998-2001 Koresh Dance Company, 2001 Shapiro and Smith Dance Company 1, 2002-2004 Sarasota Ballet of Florida, 2004-2007 River North Dance Company 3. 2001. 2007 5, 6 Koresh Dance Company.... : 243

... 14 1.,,,,.,.... Koresh Dance Company Roni Koresh,.. Batsheva Dance Company. Koresh Dance Company Koresh Dance School. Koresh Dance Company Tour Company. Roni Koresh, Itzik Galili. 11 Koresh Dance Company 5 10 4,. : 244

....,,,,... 14.. Koresh Dance Company.. 5,.,. Koresh Dance Company 1 32-35., 7.,. : 245

. 400.. 19...?.,,,....,,,,. 14. 1. 2004..,.. : 246

.... Koresh Dance Company 1.....,. 75, 35, 97 3,,......,,,,..... 14. 1 2. : 247

Helen Simoneau Dance Company /SIWIC Dance Ensemble 1981, 2008. / (Hollins/ADF Program) 2006. 2004. 2009. SIWIC(Swiss International Coaching Project for Choreographers) 2009. American Dance Festival, New York, USA 2008. American Dance Festival, Durham, USA

2009 7 23,..,... University of Michigan 10,,. 5. 2006,,,, Dance 2XS 1.. American Dance Festival, Donna Faye Burchfield co-education program 1. / Hollins/ADF Program,. Duke University,, MIT Yale. : 249

. / Hollins/ADF, American Dance Festival.,. Adjunct Faculty,.. 2008, Helen Simoneau Dance Company Helen Simoneau.,.. ]udson Memorial Church,,,. 1 30. 29,, 7 Movement Research : 250

Artist-In-Residency,.., 1, 2.,,., 1 SiWic Dance Ensemble. SIWIC Dance Ensemble. 3,. SIWIC Dance Ensemble Ventura Dance Company Pablo Ventura 9 11. 1....,. : 251

/..........,,......, : 252

..,. Helen Simoneau Dance Company Stuttgart Dance Festival /. Merce Cunningham.,... 3 American Dance Festival, Jacob s Pillow Dance Festival, Bates Dance Festival. Helen Simoneau Dance Company, ( ).,,.,.,. Helen Simoneau Dance Company 4 : 253

....,,,,..... 5,..,.. SIWIC Dance Ensemble 1,,,. 4. 200 40,. 3, 4. : 254

O1...,,,,. Politics...,.. ( )..,,.., : 255

1......,.,?..,.,.,........ : 256

? 2009 Ventura Dance Company,,, 2 2, 3., 5,. Asian Women Artists Project. 8 New York Fringe Festival...,,........... : 257

/ Prey and Pradator / Roberto Aguilar / Cris Covics / Jacek Lipowski

/ Il-hwa II: Missing Episode(Group) / / Steven Schreiber / Andrea Mohin(The New York Times)

Ko-Ryo Dance Theater Steven Schreiber 1967, 1999. American University 1990. 2009 6. Jacob s Pillow Dance Festival 2006, 2007. La MaMa Moves Blast at LaMaMa 1999, 2002, 2006. Dance New Amsterdam Raw Meterial Series 1999. Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission

2009 5 13,.,,..,., Steven Schreiber...., 10..... : 261

10 8 4,.,..,,,.,.,. 30,........... Ko-Ryo Dance Theater( ), KOREA... : 262

2001 Ko-ryo Dance Theater......,...... 5, 60. Ko-Ryo Dance Theater.,, 2...?., 1... : 263

20.. 20..,..??................,... : 264

7, 8.?,....,..!.. : 265

Trisha Brown Dance Company 1967, 2003. Dance Space Center 6 (ISVP) 2001. 1998. 2004. The point of union ( : In The Desert) 2006. The Korea Daily ( ) 2006. 2004. ( )

2009 5 22, 2003,.,,...,,...?. 2004. Trisha Brown Dance Company., Trisha Brown Dance Company. 4-5.. 2004 10. : 267

.. Trisha Brown Dance Company.,,., Trisha Brown. Trisha Brown Dance Company Trisha Brown.?.. I love my robots(2007), How long does the subject linger on the edge of the volume...(2005), PRESENT TENSE (2003), Geometry of Quiet(2002), If you couldn t see me(1994), You can see us (1995), Foray For(1990), Set and Reset(1983), Glacial Decoy(1979). Trisha Brown Dance Company 6 1 2.., : 268

., 5, 4,.,. 5.,,. 6. (,, ),..,.... 3. 1 3,.. 3 1..,.... : 269

...... 6..,..,,,.,.. 7,,, LG.. Trisha Brown Dance : 270

Company,,....................?....... : 271

Complexions Contemporary Ballet Jae Man Joo 1975, 2002 2006. (The Sacramento Ballet) 1999 2001, 2006. 1997 1998. 1998. 1997.

2009 6 5, 1998. 3. (The Sacramento Ballet) 2002 2006 (Complexions Contemporary Ballet).. 9.11 The Sacramento Ballet Complexions Contemporary Ballet Complexions Contemporary Ballet. Jae Man Joo Complexions Contemporary Ballet Dwight Rhoden Desmond Richardson. 15 2, 3.,.. Summer School.,.., 7, 8 : 273

..,.,. The Sacramento Ballet.. Complexions Contemporary Ballet,... Complexions Contemporary Ballet,.. The Sacramento Ballet, Complexions Contemporary Ballet Alvin Ailey..,,,?. 6 10 6 45.. : 274

... 11.. Complexions Contemporary Ballet... Complexions Contemporary Ballet,.. The Sacramento Ballet.,. 8 5, 6,.?.,....,,..,. : 275

,.. 34.. Complexions Contemporary Ballet. 3~4............?......?.. : 276

...,. : 277

Pittsburgh Ballet Theater /School 1969, 1997. 1991. 1988. Tokyo City Ballet 1997 2002. (Cleveland Ballet) 1994 1997. (Seoul Ballet Theater) 1991 1994. 1990. 1988.

2009 5 20, 1991.. 2 2 4.,... 25 1995. 1 Atlanta Ballet,. 1997 Cleveland Ballet, O1 3. Pittsburgh Ballet Theater, 1. 1 Pittsburgh Ballet Theater., Cleveland Ballet ( ).,. 5 Pittsburgh Ballet Theater..... : 279

?... 2, 3.....? 3 1.,... 1. 15 15 3. 5, 3 4...,,.., : 280

...,.,.. Pittsburgh Ballet Theater,.. Pittsburgh Ballet School 130..,..... Pittsburgh Ballet Theater 80%, 20%.. 50:50. 1 80.,...?? : 281

.,. Pittsburgh Ballet Theater,.? 2. 1,... 9 15 10 45 15 11 6, 5.....,,,......? 1 10, : 282

............,.........,. 41,...... ( ). O1.... : 283

...... I love Ballet!!...... : 284

: 285

Moonea Choi & Dancers 1969, 2001. / MFA 1999., 1995 1996. 1993. (M.A) 1991. 2002 2004. (Loretta Livingstone & Dancers) / (Rosana Gamsen/Woldwide) 2008. (University California Irvine) 2005. 2003. 2002 2004. (El Camino College)

2009 5 7, (Moonea Choi & Dancers) 2009 13 2002 2004 (Loretta Livingstone & Dancers) / (Rosana Gamsen/ Woldwide)..., Moorpark College, California State University of Long Beach Moorpark College El Camino College. Loretta Livingstone Loretta. Moorpark College Loretta Livingstone & Dancers. Loretta. Loretta,.., Rosana Gamsen John,.. : 287

,,? 4. 40..,.... 1, 2.. 25 6 College,.?.. LA.. Loretta Livingstone & Dancers Rosana Gamsen/Woldwide.,,,. Rosana,, Loretta.. Loretta LA. 2004 1 Lester Horton Dance Awards Loretta Livingstone & Dancers : 288

,. LA Loretta... 6.,. Loretta 1. 4.. Rosana Loretta....,,... : 289

.. Loretta.,?....,. 2009.,,,., 4..? LA.... : 290

.........?.,,..,... : 291

Cedarlake Contemporary Ballet Company 1985, 2008. Alvin Ailey School in New York Fellowship program 2008. 2004. 2007. 4

2009 5 21,. 1. Alvin Ailey School 6. 2 1 (Cedarlake Contemporary Ballet Company) 7.,...,, 3 O1. 1 7. 4.. 6,.,,,.. 3., Cedarlake Contemporary Ballet Company. SBT 3, 4. Cedarlake Contemporary Ballet Company : 293

.. Cedarlake Contemporary Ballet Company..,,,..,. Cedarlake Contemporary Ballet Company., 10 11 10, 11 10 2,,. 2, 3 3 6. 5.,.,. 4,,,. : 294

.,.. 1,......,. 2. 2.. Cedarlake Contemporary Ballet Company.,,,, 2 8... : 295

1. 2,3...,..,,,.... : 296

: 297

Da Da Dance Project 1972, 2009. 2003. 1996. 1998 2006. (Allyson Green Dance) 1998 2002. (Seán Curran Company) 1998 1999. (Limón Dance Company) 1996 1998., (San Diego, Malaschock Dance and Company) 2009. BluePrint, Prey and Predator, Ploy 2007. Automated Teller, Tras Lados 2006. Primaveria en Siberia 2004. Left Unexpected 2003. Muted Narrative

2009 7 17, 19,,.....,,,,..... 3. (San Diego, Malaschock Dance and Company) 1, (Seán Curran Company), (Allyson Green Dance), (Limón Dance Company). 1991 (ADF).,..,. Da Da Dance Project,. Da Da Dance Project,. Da Da Dance Project. : 299

,.,.,,,, 1914....,.. Da Da Dance Project..,,,. 2. Da Da Dance Project 10, 7...,..,.. : 300

.........?,........ 100, 400.. : 301

.?..?..,,,.,. : 302

: 303

Mi Young Kim Dance Company The National Ballet of Canada Suddenly Dance Theatre Vancouver Korean Dance Society Nai-ni Chen Dance Company

Canada

/ The #7 Train by Eun Hee Kim / Nina Yi / Connection / Sandra Lynn Belanger

Mi Young Kim Dance Company 1946, :,,, 50, Millenium Cheer,, Historic Story, Maple Leaf, Dance of Soul, Ritual Dance 1958. 1 1954., 1 Korean Dance Studies Society of Canada

2009 7 22,!. 6.25,,,,, ( ) 15. ( ) ( ).. 30. 1979.... 1987, 1988. 1997.,. 30 : 309

? 3....,,., 60... 18 25,...,.. : 310

..... 10.. 1997...,,, ( )..... 9 25..,.,. : 311

..?..,,..,,,, 13. 1997 (2009) (2010), 2009 9, 2010....,,,..,..? : 312

..........,.... (, ). : 313

Houston Ballet /The National Ballet of Canada 1982, 2007 2009. (Houston Ballet) 2001 2007. (The National Ballet of Canada) 1995 2000.

2009 5 21,.,..?,.,..,.. 1. 8 4,.. 2000 7 The National Ballet of Canada 12~3. Houston Ballet, Dutch National Ballet Company,, 2007., 3. 100,..,.. : 315

The National Ballet of Canada 4~5, 4~5,,,,. 1, 1. The National Ballet of Canada... The National Ballet of Canada....,.? The National Ballet of Canada,,,. Houston Ballet.... : 316

..,,,..,,.,,...... The National Ballet of Canada,,, DVD.,,, - ( )...,..,. O1. 1, 7 1.., : 317

....,.,.,....,.,,?..,,,.,.,. The National Ballet of Canada..,. 50.........,. UBC. : 318

..., 2.. The National Ballet of Canada.........,,..... : 319

Suddenly Dance Theatre 1967, 1993. 1988. 2008. Four Swallows (POMP Festival) 2007. Wen Wei Dance Unbound 2007. DUET (New Current Festival of Music) 2006. M award-favorite ( ) 2004. M award-favorite ( )

2009 7 8,,,,.! 1999...,. ( ). Suddenly Dance Theatre 2003..,....,,,..? : 321

,. Suddenly Dance Theatre 15.,.. (Battery Opera) 1 8 3,.. David Ferguson Suddenly Dance Theatre. 3, 4, Wen Wei Wang, 96 Su Feh Lee.,. Suddenly Dance Theatre... 10 11, 5, 10, 5. 6 CADA, The Canadian Alliance of Dance Artists.,.. : 322

... 2 MRI........ 3, 4,,,. 5, 6, 2,.. Suddenly Dance Theatre,,,.?. 700. : 323

500 20 25. 5 700,... 1 40 10, 1..?........ ( )..... : 324

... 5, 6 10........?..,?,,.. : 325

Vancouver Korean Dance Society 1966, 1990. 1989. 2007-. Canada (Canada Art Council) 2003-. (USA) 1997-1998. (Vancouver School Board) 2009. Canada (Canada Heritage) 2008. Canada BC 2005. 1988. 1988.

2009 7 8, (Vancouver Korean Dance Society) 2007, 2008 BC 2009 (Canada Heritage). B.C (Coquitlam city) Korean Dance Festival..? 1996.., 100.. 100. 20. 20.... 3,. Vancouver Korean Dance Society, 2007 : 327

.. Vancouver Korean Dance Society 13, 5 13. 1,300.,,... Vancouver Korean Dance Society. 20, 13. 20-40,,,. 2. 13.,, DVD,....... : 328

.,,...... Vancouver Korean Dance Society. 3 1 10 450. 10.! 10..... 1.. 8 13.. Vancouver Korean Dance Society 1. 5,.. : 329

... Canadian......,.?. 100. 2, 30... ( ) ( ).,... 7, 8... 5.. : 330

.....,,,..,,,.??..?,.,,......,. : 331

Nai-Ni Chen Dance Company Young Kyu Park 1979, 2003. 2008 2009. (Colemanlemieux & Compagnie Company) 2000 2006. Tatmaroo Dance Company, Hong Dance Company 2009. The # 7 Train by Eun Hee Kim New York 2008. La ou je vis by by Le Carre des Lombes - Montreal 2008. In Camera by James Kudelka - Toronto & Ottawa