특집-김호진

Similar documents
The Window of Multiple Sclerosis

Pharmacotherapeutics Application of New Pathogenesis on the Drug Treatment of Diabetes Young Seol Kim, M.D. Department of Endocrinology Kyung Hee Univ

A 617

975_983 특집-한규철, 정원호

Treatment and Role of Hormaonal Replaement Therapy

김범수

ÀÇÇа�ÁÂc00Ì»óÀÏ˘

7.ƯÁýb71ÎÀ¯È« š

석사논문.PDF

00약제부봄호c03逞풚

May 10~ Hotel Inter-Burgo Exco, Daegu Plenary lectures From metabolic syndrome to diabetes Meta-inflammation responsible for the progression fr

Can032.hwp

페링야간뇨소책자-내지-16

기관고유연구사업결과보고

노영남

<30322D28C0CCB1A4BCF62DBEC8C0E7BFB5292D6F6B2E687770>

<BFA9BAD02DB0A1BBF3B1A4B0ED28C0CCBCF6B9FC2920B3BBC1F62E706466>

<B0E6C8F1B4EBB3BBB0FA20C0D3BBF3B0ADC1C E687770>

16_이주용_155~163.hwp

황지웅



서강대학원123호

( )Jkstro011.hwp

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

°í¼®ÁÖ Ãâ·Â

untitled


Lumbar spine

(

< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc


#Ȳ¿ë¼®

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

歯1.PDF

<303038C0AFC8A3C1BE5B315D2DB1B3C1A42E687770>

슬라이드 1

(Microsoft PowerPoint - S13-3_\261\350\273\363\307\366 [\310\243\310\257 \270\360\265\345])

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

440 /


- 증 례

γ

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

<30312DC1BEBCB320BCD5C0BAC8F12E687770>

1..

, 41 ( ) * 1) ***.,. I.,..., ( ) ( ).,. ( ) *. ** 1

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특


139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

서론 34 2

44-4대지.07이영희532~

<C7A5C1F620BEE7BDC4>

03이경미(237~248)ok

11¹Ú´ö±Ô

대한한의학원전학회지26권4호-교정본(1125).hwp

12이문규

°ø±â¾Ð±â±â

( )Kju269.hwp

<31C1BEBCB D BAF3C3A2C8C62DB9DAB9CEBCF62E687770>

( ) Jkra076.hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

012임수진


09김정식.PDF


16(1)-3(국문)(p.40-45).fm

1. 서론 1-1 연구 배경과 목적 1-2 연구 방법과 범위 2. 클라우드 게임 서비스 2-1 클라우드 게임 서비스의 정의 2-2 클라우드 게임 서비스의 특징 2-3 클라우드 게임 서비스의 시장 현황 2-4 클라우드 게임 서비스 사례 연구 2-5 클라우드 게임 서비스에

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

노인정신의학회보14-1호

Vol.257 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

09È«¼®¿µ 5~152s

ePapyrus PDF Document

°Ç°�°úÁúº´5-44È£ÃÖÁ¾

<BFACBCBCC0C7BBE7C7D E687770>

<31382D322D3420BDC5B1D4C8AF5FB3EDB9AE28C3D6C1BEBABB292E687770>



Rheu-suppl hwp

Output file


Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

04조남훈

Trd022.hwp

<30382EC0C7C7D0B0ADC1C22E687770>

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

2 大 韓 政 治 學 會 報 ( 第 18 輯 1 號 ) 과의 소통부재 속에 여당과 국회도 무시한 일방적인 밀어붙이기식 국정운영을 보여주고 있다. 민주주의가 무엇인지 다양하게 논의될 수 있지만, 민주주의 운영에 필요한 최소한의 제도적 조건은 권력 행사에서 국가기관 사이의


Microsoft PowerPoint - AC3.pptx

06_À̼º»ó_0929

hwp

<5B D B3E220C1A634B1C720C1A632C8A320B3EDB9AEC1F628C3D6C1BE292E687770>

본문01

Transcription:

Focused Issue of This Month Multiple Sclerosis Woojun Kim, MDHo Jin Kim, MD Department of NeurologyNational Cancer Center E - mail : hojinkim@ncc.re.kr J Korean Med Assoc 2009; 52(7): 665-676 Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) and one of the most common disabling neurological diseases of young adults. Although the exact mechanisms involved in MS pathogenesis remain unclear, MS is believed to be caused by interactions between as yet unidentified environmental factors and susceptibility genes. Symptoms commonly occurred in MS include visual disturbance; weakness; spasticity; sensory disturbances; ataxia; bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction; fatigue; affective symptoms; and cognitive impairment. Most patients initially undergo a relapsing-remitting course, however, without treatment, the majority of them make a transition to the secondary progressive form. The clinical diagnosis is based on demonstrating neurological lesions, predominantly in the white matter, that are disseminated over space with the lapse of time. The key to the successful MS management is to prevent disability. Although there is no effective cure for MS, therapies are available that mitigate the course of the disease, treat relapses and improve symptoms, all of which place a significant impact on patients quality of life. Recent clinical trials suggest that early identification and treatment are critical to optimize the treatment benefit. Currently six agents have been specifically approved for mitigating the course of MS. These include three formulations of interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, mitoxantrone, and natalizumab. Recent advances in understanding of immune pathogenesis lead us to new therapeutic approaches focused on precise target mechanisms. Many ongoing clinical trials will provide better treatment protocols in near future. Keywords: Multiple sclerosis; Epidemiology; Immunopathology; Diagnosis; Treatment 665

Kim WKim HJ 666

Multiple Sclerosis A B C D E APC = antigen presenting cell, IFN = interferon, MBP = myelin basic protein, MHC = major histocompatibility complex, MMP = matrix metalloproteinase, NOI = nitric oxide intermediates, ROI = reactive oxygen intermediates, TCR = T cell receptor, TNF = tumor necrosis factor, VCAM = vascular cell adhesion molecule, VLA = very late antigen. Figure 1. The five key immunopathogenic processes in multiple sclerosis (MS) targeted by MS therapies (10). (A) T cell activation and differentiation into T-helper (Th) -1 cells, (B) interleukin (IL)-2-induced proliferation of activated Th1 cells, (C) recruitment of B cells and monocytes by activated Th1 cells, (D) activated Th1 cell trafficking across the blood- brain barrier (BBB), (E) T cell reactivation and induction of immune cell-mediated demyelination. 667

Kim WKim HJ 668

Multiple Sclerosis Figure 2. Diagram representing the different types of multiple sclerosis. 669

Kim WKim HJ Table 1. 2005 Revisions to the McDonald Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis (25) Clinical Presentation Two or more attacks a ; objective clinical evidence of two or more lesions Two or more attacksa; objective clinical evidence of one lesion One attack a ; objective clinical evidence of two or more lesions One attack a ; objective clinical evidence of one lesion (monosymptomatic presentation; clinically isolated syndrome) Insidious neurological progression suggestive of MS Additional Data Needed for MS Diagnosis None b Dissemination in space, demonstrated by: MRIc or Two or more MRI- detected lesions consistent with MS plus positive CSF d or Await further clinical attacka implicating a different site Dissemination in time, demonstrated by: MRIe or a Second clinical attack Dissemination in space, demonstrated by: MRIc or Two or more MRI-detected lesions consistent with MS plus positive CSF d and Dissemination in time, demonstrated by: MRIe or a Second clinical attack One year of disease progression (retrospectively or prospectively determined) and two of the following: a. Positive brain MRI (nine T2 lesions or four or more T2 lesions with positive VEP) f b. Positive spinal cord MRI (two focal T2 lesions) c. Positive CSF d If criteria indicated are fulfilled and there is no better explanation for the clinical presentation, the diagnosis is MS; if suspicious, but the criteria are not completely met, the diagnosis is possible MS ; if another diagnosis arises during the evaluation that better explains the entire clinical presentation, then the diagnosis is not MS. a An attack is defined as an episode of neurological disturbance for which causative lesions are likely to be inflammatory and demyelinating in nature. There should be subjective report (backed up by objective findings) or objective observation that the event lasts for at least 24 hours. b No additional tests are required; however, if tests (MRI, CSF) are undertaken and are negative, extreme caution needs to be taken before making a diagnosis of MS. Alternative diagnoses must be considered. There must be no better explanation for the clinical picture and some objective evidence to support a diagnosis of MS. c MRI demonstration of space dissemination must fulfill the criteria derived from Barkhof and colleagues and Tintoré and coworkers. d Positive CSF determined by oligoclonal bands detected by established methods (isoelectric focusing) different from any such bands in serum, or by an increased IgG index. e MRI demonstration of time dissemination must fulfill the criteria in Table 3. f Abnormal VEP of the type seen in MS. MS = multiple sclerosis, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, CSF = cerebrospinal fluid, VEP = visual- evoked potential Table 2. MRI criteria to demonstrate brain abnormality and demonstration of dissemination in space Three of the followings: 1 At least one gadolinium- enhancing lesion or nine T2 hyperintense lesions if there is no gadolinium enhancing lesion 2 At least one infratentorial lesion 3 At least one juxtacortical lesion 4 At least three periventricular lesions NOTE: A spinal cord lesion can be considered equivalent to a brain infratentorial lesion: an enhancing spinal cord lesion is considered to be equivalent to an enhancing brain lesion, and individual spinal cord lesions can contribute together with individual brain lesions to reach the required number of T2 lesions. Table 3. MRI criteria to demonstrate dissemination of lesions in time There are two ways to show dissemination in time using imaging: a. Detection of gadolinium enhancement at least 3 months after the onset of the initial clinical event, if not at the site corresponding to the initial event b. Detection of a new T2 lesion if it appears at any time compared with a reference scan done at least 30 days after the onset of the initial clinical event 670

Multiple Sclerosis 671

Kim WKim HJ A Figure 3. Representing MRI of multiple sclerosis. (A) Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI demonstrates typical multiple perpendicular-axis periventricular white matter lesions called Dawson s fingers. (B) Gadolinium enhanced T1-weighted MRI shows well-enhancing MS plaque. B 672

Multiple Sclerosis Table 4. List of US food and drug administration-approved disease-modifying therapies Disease-modifying Approved indication Dose/Route Frequency Recommended tests agent Glitiramer acetate RR 20 mg/sc q day None (Copaxone ) Inteferon -1a Relapsing forms 30 µg/im q week LFTs and CBCs at baseline, (Avonex ) 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, then periodically in absence of clinical symptoms Consistent with MS TFTs q 6 months in those with thyroid consistent with MS thyroid dysfunction or as clinically indicated Inteferon -1a Relapsing forms 22 µg or 44 µg/sc TIW LFTs and CBCs at baseline, 1 month, (Rebif ) (titration needed) 3 months, 6 months, then periodically in absence of clinical symptoms TFTs q 6 months in those with thyroid dysfunction or as clinically indicated, then periodic intervals in absence of clinical symptoms Inteferon -1b Relapsing forms 250 µg/sc qod LFTs and CBCs at baseline, 1 month, (Betaferon ) (titration needed) 3 months, 6 months, then periodically in absence of clinical symptoms CIS with MRI features TFTs q 6 months in those with thyroid consistent with MS dysfunction or as clinically indicated Natalizumab Relapsing forms 300 mg/iv q 4 weeks MRI with contrast of the brain prior (Tysabri ) to initiation Inadequate response to MRI and CSF testing for JC virus disease-modifying therapies when suspecting PML Monotherapy only Clinical follow-up at 3 and 6 months; then q 6 months thereafter Mitoxantrone Worsening RR, PR, 12 mg/m 2 /IV q 3 months LVEF evaluation at baseline (Novantrone ) or SP and prior to each dose Cumulative lifetime Contraindicated if LVEF <50% dose 140 mg/m 2 LFTs and CBCs at baseline and prior to each dose CBC = complete blood count with platelets, CIS = clinically isolated syndrome, DMT = disease-modifying therapy, LFT = liver function tests, LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction, MS = multiple sclerosis, PML = progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, PR = progressive-relapsing, q = every, qod = every other day, RR = relapsing-remitting, SC = subcutaneous, SP = secondary progressive, TFT = thyroid function tests, TIW = 3 times a week 673

Kim WKim HJ 11. Ropper AH, Brown RH, eds. Adams and Victor s principles of neurology. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005: 771-796. 12. Compston A. Genetic epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997; 62: 553-561. 13. Kurtzke JF. Mutliple sclerosis in time and space-geographic clues to cause. J Neurovirol 2000; 6: 134-140. 14. Raghuwanshi A, Joshi SS, Christakos S. Vitamin D and multiple sclerosis. J Cell Biochem 2008; 105: 338-343. 15. Gale CR, Martyn CN. Migrant studies in multiple sclerosis. Prog Neurobiol 1995; 47: 425-448. 16. Sibley WA, Bamford CR, Clark K. Clinical viral infections and multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1985; 1: 1313-1315. 17. Willer CJ, Dyment DA, Risch NJ, Sadovnick AD, Ebers GC. Canadian Collaborative Study Group. Twin concordance and sibling recurrence rates in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 100: 12877-12882. 674

Multiple Sclerosis 18. Olerup O, Hillert J. HLA class II-associated genetic susceptibility in multiple sclerosis: a critical evaluation. Tissue Antigens 1991; 38: 1-15. 19. Svejgaard A. The immunogenetics of multiple sclerosis. Immunogenetics 2008; 60: 275-286. 10. Chofflon M. Mechanisms of action for treatments in multiple sclerosis; Does a heterogeneous disease demand a multitargeted therapeutic approach? BioDrugs 2005; 19: 299-308. 11. Bar-Or A. Immunology of multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin 2005; 23: 149-175. 12. Archelos JJ, Storch MK, Hartung HP. The role of B cells and autoantibodies in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2000; 47: 694-706. 13. Link H, Muller R. Immunoglobulins in multiple sclerosis and infections of the nervous system. Arch Neurol 1971; 25: 326-344. 14. Johnson KP, Nelson BJ. Multiple sclerosis: diagnostic usefulness of cerebrospinal fluid. Ann Neurol 1977; 2: 425-431. 15. Raine CS, Cannella B, Hause SL, Genain CP. Demyelination in primate autoimmune encephalopmyelitis and acute multiple sclerosis lesion: a case for antigen-speficit antibody mediation. Ann Neurol 1999; 46: 144-160. 16. Lucchinetti C, Bruck W, Parisi J, Scheithauer B, Rodriguez M, Lassmann H. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesion: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination. Ann Neurol 2000; 47: 707-717. 17. Buntinx M, Moreels M, Vandenabeele F, Lambrichts I, Raus J, Steels P, Stinissen P, Amellot M. Cytokine-induced cell death in human oligodendroglial cell lines: I. Synergistic effects of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha on apoptosis. J Neurosci Res 2004; 76: 834-845. 18. Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mork S, Bo L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 29: 278-285. 19. Hauser SL, Goodin DS; Multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases. In Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, Isselbacher K. Harrison s Online. 2006. Available from: URL:http://www.accessmedicine.com. New York, McGraw- Hill. 20. Rizzo JF III, Lessell S. Risk of developing multiple sclerosis after uncomplicated optic neuritis: A long -term prospective study. Neurology 1988; 38: 185-190. 21. Optic neuritis study group. The five-year risk of MS after optic neuritis. Experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Neurology 1997; 49: 1404-1413. 22. Lucchinetti CF, Kiers L, O Duffy A, Gomez MR, Cross S, Leavitt JA, O Brien P, Rodriguez M. Risk factors for developing multiple sclerosis after childhood optic neuritis. Neurology 1997; 49: 1413-1418. 23. Beck RW, Trobe JD, Moke PS, Gal RL, Xing D, Bhatti MT, Brodsky MC, Buckley EG, Chrousos GA, Corbett J, Eggenberger E, Goodwin JA, Katz B, Kaufman DI, Keltner JL, Kupersmith MJ, Miller NR, Nazarian S, Orengo -Nania S, Savino PJ, Shults WT, Smith CH, Wall M; Optic neuritis study group. High - and low-risk profiles for the development of multiple sclerosis within 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 944-949. 24. Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials on New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996; 46: 907-911. 25. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Metz LM, McFarland HF, O Connor PW, Wandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Weinchenker BG, Wolinsky JS. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the McDonald Criteria. Ann Neurol 2005; 58: 840-846. 26. Katzman GL. Multiple sclerosis. In: Osborn AG, Blaser SI, Salzman KL, Katzman GL, Provenzale J, Castillo M, Hedlund GL, Illner A, Harnsberger HR, Cooper JA, Jones BV, Hamilton BE, eds. Diagnostic imaging. Brain. Salt Lake City: Amirsys, 2004. I - 8.74-8.77. 27. Jiang H, Milo R, Swoveland P, Johnson KP, Panitch H, Dhib- Jalbut S. Interferon beta-1b reduces interferon gammainduced antigen-presenting capacity of human glial and B cells. J Neuroimmunol 1995; 61: 17-25. 28. Genc K, Dona DL, Reder AT. Increased CD80 (+) B cells in active multiple sclerosis and reversal by interferon beta-1b therapy. J Clin Invest 1997; 99: 2664-2671. 29. Teleshova N, Bao W, Kivisakk P, Ozenci V, Mustafa M, Link H. Elevated CD40 ligand expressing blood T-cell levels in multiple sclerosis are reversed by interferon-beta treatment. Scand J Immunol 2000; 51: 312-320. 30. Sharief MK, Semra YK, Seidi OA, Zoukos Y. Interferon-beta therapy downregulates the anti-apoptosis protein FLIP in T cells from patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2001; 120: 199-207. 31. Calabresi PA, Pelfrey CM, Tranquill LR, Maloni H, McFarland HF. VLA-4 expression on peripheral blood lymphocytes is downregulated after treatment of multiple sclerosis with interferon beta. Neurology 1997; 49: 1111-1116 32. Calabresi PA, Tranquill LR, Dambrosia JM, Stone LA, Maloni H, Bash CN, Frank JA, McFarland HF. Increases in soluble VCAM-1 correlate with a decrease in MRI lesions in multiple sclerosis treated with interferon beta-1b. Ann Neurol 1997; 41: 669-674. 33. Trojano M, Avolio C, Liuzzi GM, Ruggieri M, Defazio G, Liguori M, Santacroce MP, Paolicelli D, Giuliani F, Riccio P, Livrea P. Changes of serum sicam-1 and MMP-9 induced by rifnbeta- 675

Kim WKim HJ 1b treatment in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology 1999; 53: 1402-1408. 34. Calabresi PA, Stone LA, Bash CN, Frank JA, McFarland HF. Interferon beta results in immediate reduction of contrastenhanced MRI lesions in multiple sclerosis patients followed by weekly MRI. Neurology 1997; 48: 1446-1448. 35. Petersen B, Bendtzen K, Koch-Henriksen N, Ravnborg M, Ross C, Sorensen PS; Danish multiple sclerosis group. Persistence of neutralizeing antibodies after discontinuation of IFN beta therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2006; 12: 247-252. 36. Jacobs LD, Beck RW, Simon JH, Kinkel RP, Brownscheidle CM, Murray TJ, Simonian NA, Slasor PJ, Sandrock AW. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a therapy initiated during a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. CHAMPS Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 898-904. 37. Comi G, Filippi M, Barkhof F, Durelli L, Edan G, Fernández O, Hartung H, Seeldrayers P, Sørensen PS, Rovaris M, Martinelli V, Hommes OR; Early Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Effect of early interferon treatment on conversion to definite multiple sclerosis: a randomised study. Lancet 2001; 357: 1576-1582. 38. Kappos L, Polman CH, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Bauer L, Jakobs P, Pohl C, Sandbrink R. Treatment with interferon beta-1b delays conversion to clinically definite and McDonald MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 2006; 67: 1242-1249. 39. Arnon R. The development of Cop 1 (Copaxone), and innovative drug for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: personal reflextions. Immunol Lett 1996; 50: 1-15. 40. Teitelbaum D, Meshorer A, Hirshfeld T, Arnon R, Sela M. Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by a synthetic polypeptide. Eur J Immunol 1971; 1: 242-248. 41. Neuhaus O, Farina C, Wekerle H, Hohlfeld R. Mechanisms of action of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2001; 56: 702-708. 42. Weber MS, Starck M, Wagenpfeil S, Meinl E, Hohlfeld R, Farina C. Multiple sclerosis: glatiramer acetate inhibits monocyte reactivity in vitro and in vivo. Brain 2004; 127: 1370-1378. 43. Kim HJ, Ifergan I, Antel JP, Seguin R, Duddy M, Lapierre Y, Jalili F, Bar-Or A. Type 2 monocyte and microglia differentiation mediated by glatiramer acetate therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Immunol 2004; 172: 7144-7153. 44. Fox EJ. Mechanism of action of mitoxantrone. Neurology 2004; 63: 15-18. 45. Niino M, Bodner C, Simard ML, Alatab S, Gano D, Kim HJ, Trigueiro M, Racicot D, Guérette C, Antel JP, Fournier A, Grand'Maison F, Bar - Or A. Natalizumab effects on immune cell responses in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2006; 59: 748-754. 46. Miller DH, Khan OA, Sheremata WA, Blumhardt LD, Rice GP, Libonati MA, Willmer - Hulme AJ, Dalton CM, Miszkiel KA, O Connor PW; International natalizumab multiple sclerosis trial group. A controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 15-23. 47. Kleinschmidt - DeMasters BK, Tyler KL. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy complicating treatment with natalizumab and interferon- b-1a for multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 369-374. 48. Langer -Gould A, Atlas SW, Green AJ, Bollen AW, Pelletier D. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after natalizumab therapy for Crohn s disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 362-368. 49. Buttmann M, Rieckmann P. Treating multiple sclerosis with monoclonal antibodies. Expert Rev Neurother 2008; 8: 433-455. 50. Cohen BA, Reickmann P. Emerging oral therapies for multiple sclerosis. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 1922-1930. 51. Kesselring J, Beer S. Symptomatic therapy and neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4: 643-652. Peer Reviewers Commentary 676