(Microsoft PowerPoint - CXBTUEOAPVQY.ppt [\310\243\310\257 \270\360\265\345])

Similar documents
저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

(Microsoft PowerPoint - S13-3_\261\350\273\363\307\366 [\310\243\310\257 \270\360\265\345])

기관고유연구사업결과보고

전립선암발생률추정과관련요인분석 : The Korean Cancer Prevention Study-II (KCPS-II)

Treatment and Role of Hormaonal Replaement Therapy

590호(01-11)

00약제부봄호c03逞풚

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구


untitled

May 10~ Hotel Inter-Burgo Exco, Daegu Plenary lectures From metabolic syndrome to diabetes Meta-inflammation responsible for the progression fr

Risk of Developing Hypertension by Daily Intake of Alcohol

1..

노영남

A 617

황지웅

012임수진

고혈압 어떻게 잘 진단하고, 치료할 것인가?

歯1.PDF

슬라이드 1

원위부요척골관절질환에서의초음파 유도하스테로이드주사치료의효과 - 후향적 1 년경과관찰연구 - 연세대학교대학원 의학과 남상현

DIABETES FACT SHEET IN KOREA 2012 SUMMARY About 3.2 million Korean people (10.1%) aged over 30 years or older had diabetes in Based on fasting g

Kjcg007( ).hwp

약수터2호최종2-웹용

( )Jkstro011.hwp

YI Ggodme : The Lives and Diseases of Females during the Latter Half of the Joseon Dynasty as Reconstructed with Cases in Yeoksi Manpil (Stray Notes w

고혈압 어떻게 잘 진단하고, 치료할 것인가?



Pharmacotherapeutics Application of New Pathogenesis on the Drug Treatment of Diabetes Young Seol Kim, M.D. Department of Endocrinology Kyung Hee Univ

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

< FB4EBB1B8BDC320BAB8B0C7BAB9C1F6C5EBB0E8BFACBAB820B9DFB0A320BFACB1B85FBEF6B1E2BAB92E687770>

김범수


레이아웃 1

Lumbar spine

Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

본발표와관련된이해관계 없음 대한당뇨병학회학술위원회

11¹ÚÇý·É

<35BFCFBCBA2E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 동일조건변경허락 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 이차적저작물을작성할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비

Microsoft PowerPoint - XUOBWSQUNNWX.pptx

레이아웃 1

<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>

Microsoft PowerPoint - NPDZIIEIJWUR.pptx

서론

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy

637

Microsoft PowerPoint - Benefits of CRT-D in CHF.ppt

untitled

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

Microsoft PowerPoint - CNVZNGWAIYSE.pptx


서론 34 2

페링야간뇨소책자-내지-16



<B0A3C3DFB0E828C0DBBEF7292E687770>


. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

untitled

Vol.259 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

,......

심장2.PDF

°Ç°�°úÁúº´5-44È£ÃÖÁ¾

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

석사논문.PDF

<31342EBCBAC7FDBFB52E687770>

Homocysteine

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

<31382D322D3420BDC5B1D4C8AF5FB3EDB9AE28C3D6C1BEBABB292E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Microsoft PowerPoint - CNVZNGWAIYSE.pptx

부속

연하곤란

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

°Ç°�°úÁúº´6-2È£

Microvascular Angina Data From Korean Women's Chest Pain Registry

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

hwp

달생산이 초산모 분만시간에 미치는 영향 Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 達 은 23) 의 丹 溪 에 최초로 기 재된 처방으로, 에 복용하면 한 다하여 난산의 예방과 및, 등에 널리 활용되어 왔다. 達 은 이 毒 하고 는 甘 苦 하여 氣, 氣 寬,, 結 의 효능이 있

항균제 관리 필요성

Microsoft PowerPoint - 발표자료(KSSiS 2016)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

歯4차학술대회원고(황수경이상호).PDF

ps

12이문규

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

15(1)-01(국)(p.1-8).fm

슬라이드 1

Microsoft PowerPoint - SS2_Dr.LeeHY(fiber).ppt

<5B31362E30332E31315D20C5EBC7D5B0C7B0ADC1F5C1F8BBE7BEF720BEC8B3BB2DB1DDBFAC2E687770>

KD hwp

Microsoft PowerPoint - YEMNQZEWSOVU.pptx

(Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern (Micro- Environment) Re

(Microsoft PowerPoint - src.ppt [\310\243\310\257 \270\360\265\345])

(Microsoft PowerPoint - PJIOFGQVDOKY.ppt [\310\243\310\257 \270\360\265\345])

OvCa guideline ( )

Transcription:

당뇨병환자에서항혈소판제사용 - 아스피린일차예방을중심으로 - 경희대학교강동경희대병원 황유철

말씀드릴내용 당뇨병및심혈관질환의역학 아스피린의심혈관질환 1차, 2차예방효과 아스피린부작용및용량에따른효과차이 당뇨병환자에서아스피린사용의적응증

사망원인순위, 2010 년 25.6% 통계청

심혈관질환에의한의료비추세 6 조 1400 억 국민건강보험공단, 2002-2009

Multidisciplinary approach for CVD prevention

Steno-2: Percentage of Patients at Treatment Goals at End of Study

Steno-2: Effect of Multifactorial Intervention on Various CV Events in Type 2 Diabetes

Steno-2: Effect of Multifactorial Intervention on CV Events in Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes Care 2008;31:S27-8.

Aspirin for CVD secondary prevention

Aspirin s Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction Second International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS-2) 17,187 patients randomized to aspirin, streptokinase, both, or placebo Aspirin showed a 23% RRR (ARR 2.5% NNT 40) in cardiovascular death Benefit was additive with streptokinase Lancet 1988; 2: 349-60

Aspirin for Secondary Prevention Antithrombotic Trialists Collaboration Meta-analysis of 65 trials using aspirin in over high-risk patients Over 140,000 patients total 22% odds reduction in all vascular events (2.5% absolute reduction) BMJ 2002; 324: 71-86

Aspirin for CVD primary prevention

Aspirin for primary Prevention Study /year Aspirin dose (mg) F/U (yr) No. Female (%) Age (yr) CHD RR (95% CI) control vs. aspirin Stroke RR (95% CI) aspirin vs. control PHS DM/1989 325 EOD 5.0 533 70 >40 0.59 (0.33-1.06) 1.50 (0.69-3.25) ETDRS/1992 650 5.0 3711 44 >18 0.85 (0.73-1.00) 1.18 (0.88-1.58) PPP DM/2003 100 3.7 1031 52 >50 0.49 (0.17-1.43) 0.90 (0.38-2.09) WHS DM/2005 100 EOD 10.1 1027 100 >45 1.34 (0.85-2.12) 0.45 (0.25-0.82) TPT DM/199 75 6.7 68 0 >45 0.90 (0.28-2.89) 0.67 (0.06-7.06) BMD/1988 500 5.6 101 0 >50 1.00 (0.42-2.40) 1.39 (0.15-12.86) HOT DM/1998 75 3.8 1501 47 >50 0.77 (0.44-1.36) 0.91 (0.52-1.61) Pignone M et al. JACC 2010;55:2878-86.

Two primary prevention trials The Japanese Primary Prevention of Atherosclerosis With Aspirin for Diabetes (JPAD) Trial The Prevention of Progression of Arterial Disease and Diabetes (POPADAD) Trial

Efficacy of Low-Dose Aspirin Therapy for the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Events in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The Japanese Primary Prevention of Atherosclerosis With Aspirin for Diabetes (JPAD) Trial Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial low-dose aspirin group (81 or 100 mg/day) vs. non-aspirin group 163 institutions in Japan Inclusion Criteria: Type 2 diabetes between ages 30 and 85 years Exclusion Criteria: prior CVD, atrial fibrillation, history of severe gastric or duodenal ulcer, and use of antiplatelet or antithrombotic medication

Patient Flow and Outcomes 2567 Patients were screened 2539 Randomized 28 Excluded 6 Withdrew consent 10 History of atherosclerotic disease 10 Aged >85 years 1 No diabetes 1 Receiving warfarin 1262 Randomized to receive aspirin 1277 Randomized to nonaspirin group 1139 Received aspirin through completion of trial 123 Stopped taking aspirin 9 Received aspirin or other antiplatelet therapy 6 Received aspirin 3 Received other antiplatelet medication 1165 Followed up through end of study 97 Lost to follow-up 1181 Followed up through end of study 96 Lost to follow-up 1262 Included in efficacy and safety analyses 1277 Included in efficacy and safety analyses

Baseline Clinical Characteristics Characteristic Aspirin Group (n = 1262) Nonaspirin Group (n = 1277) Age (y)* 65 ± 10 64 ± 10 Male, n (%) 706 (56) 681 (53) Current smoker, n (%) 289 (23) 248 (19) Body mass index (kg/m 2 )* 24 ± 4 24 ± 4 Hypertension, n (%) 742 (59) 731 (57) Dyslipidemia, n (%) 680 (54) 665 (52) Duration of diabetes (y), median (IQR) 7.3 (2.8-12.3) 6.7 (3.0-12.5) Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)* 136 ± 15 134 ± 15 Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)* 77 ± 9 76 ± 9 *Mean ± SD.

Primary End Point: Total Atherosclerotic Events According to the Treatment Groups 10 8 6 Log-Rank Test, P = 0.16 HR (95% CI): 0.80 (0.58 1.10) % 4 2 Aspirin Group Nonaspirin Group 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years Nonaspirin Group (n) Aspirin Group (n) 1277 1220 1165 1117 813 135 1262 1210 1159 1095 806 140

Fatal Coronary and Cerebrovascular Events According to the Treatment Groups 1.0 Log-Rank Test, P = 0.0037 HR (95% CI): 0.10 (0.01 0.79) 0.8 0.6 % 0.4 0.2 Aspirin Group Non-Aspirin Group Nonaspirin Group (n) Aspirin Group (n) 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years 1277 1220 1165 1117 813 135 1262 1210 1159 1095 806 140

Other End Points Aspirin Group n (%) Nonaspirin Group n (%) HR 95% CI P Value CHD events (fatal + nonfatal) 28 (2.2) 35 (2.7) 0.81 0.49 1.33 0.40 Fatal MI 0 (0) 5 (0.4) Nonfatal MI 12 (1.0) 9 (0.7) 1.34 0.57 3.19 0.50 Unstable angina 4 (0.3) 10 (0.8) 0.40 0.13 1.29 0.13 Stable angina 12 (1.0) 11 (0.9) 1.10 0.49 2.50 0.82 Stroke (fatal + nonfatal) 28 (2.2) 32 (2.5) 0.84 0.53 1.32 0.44 Fatal stroke 1 (0.08) 5 (0.4) 0.20 0.024 1.74 0.15 Nonfatal stroke (ischemic) 22 (1.7) 24 (1.9) 0.93 0.52 1.66 0.80 Nonfatal stroke (hemorrhagic) 5 (0.4) 3 (0.2) 1.68 0.40 7.04 0.48 Transient ischemic attack 5 (0.4) 8 (0.6) 0.63 0.21 1.93 0.42 Peripheral artery disease* 7 (0.6) 11 (0.9) 0.64 0.25 1.65 0.35 Total mortality 34 (2.7) 38 (3.0) 0.90 0.57 1.14 0.67 *Arteriosclerosis obliterans (5 in aspirin group and 8 in nonaspirin group); aortic dissection (2 fatal in the aspirin group and 1 nonfatal in the nonaspirin group); mesenteric artery thrombosis (1 in the nonaspirin group) and retinal artery thrombosis (1 in the nonaspirin group).

Age, y Aspirin Group Nonaspirin Group Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 65 45/719 59/644 0.68 (0.46 0.99) <65 23/543 27/633 1.0 (0.57 1.70) Gender Male 40/706 51/681 0.74 (0.49 1.12) Female 28/556 35/596 0.88 (0.53 1.44) Hypertensive Status Hypertensive 49/742 55/731 0.88 (0.60 1.30) Normotensive 19/520 31/546 0.64 (0.36 1.13) Lipid Status Dyslipidemia 38/680 43/665 0.88 (0.57 1.37) Normolipidemia 30/582 43/612 0.71 (0.45 1.14) Smoking Current or past smoker Subgroup Analysis Events, No./Total No. 36/565 42/494 0.73 (0.47 1.14) Nonsmoker 32/697 44/783 0.83 (0.53 1.31) Favors Aspirin Favors No Aspirin 0.3 1.0 Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 2.0

Total Atherosclerotic Events According to the Treatment Groups: Subgroup Aged 65 Years or Older 12 10 8 Log-Rank Test, P = 0.047 HR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.46-0.99) % 6 4 2 Aspirin Group Nonaspirin Group Nonaspirin Group (n) Aspirin Group (n) 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years 644 612 582 553 396 73 719 683 656 619 452 77

Adverse Events No difference between aspirin group (10 patients) and nonaspirin group (7 patients) for composite of hemorrhagic stroke and severe GI bleeding 4 cases of severe gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding that required transfusion in aspirin group 6 hemorrhagic strokes (1 fatal) in aspirin group and 7 hemorrhagic strokes (4 fatal) in nonaspirin group

Belch J et al. BMJ 2008;337:a1840.

Study design 40 year, ABI <0.99, CVD (-) 100mg daily Belch J et al. BMJ 2008;337:a1840.

Cardiovascular outcomes Belch J et al. BMJ 2008;337:a1840.

All cause mortality Belch J et al. BMJ 2008;337:a1840.

Primary and secondary end points

Meta-analysis of aspirin primary prevention trials ADA/AHA/ACCF

Meta-Analysis of Aspirin - CHD

Meta-Analysis of Aspirin Stroke

Aspirin dose - prospective trials Campbell CL et al. JAMA 2007;297:2018-24.

Aspirin dose - Retrospective observational study Campbell CL et al. JAMA 2007;297:2018-24.

Risk for hemorrhagic stroke Absolute risk increase of 12 events per 10,000 person during 37 months He J et al. JAMA 1998;280:1930-5.

Hemorrhagic stroke in subgroups He J et al. JAMA 1998;280:1930-5.

Risk for GI bleeding

Risk for GI bleeding by age, sex

Risk for GI bleeding Meta-analysis of the six primary prevention trials - RR 1.54 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.82). - absolute increase in risk : 3 in 10 000 per year in mainly middle-aged adults Higher CVD risk are also at higher risk for aspirin-related adverse effects. Diabetes taking aspirin experienced a 55% increased risk (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.14) Pignone M, et al. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1395-1402.

ADA/AHA/ACC: Recommendations for Use of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of CV Events in People With Diabetes Recommendation Low-dose (75 162 mg/d) aspirin use for prevention is reasonable for adults with diabetes and no previous history of vascular disease who are at increased CVD risk and who are not at increased risk for bleeding Aspirin should not be recommended for CVD prevention for adults with diabetes at low CVD risk potential adverse effects from bleeding outweigh potential benefits Low-dose (75 162 mg/d) aspirin use for prevention might be considered for those with diabetes at intermediate CVD risk until further research is available Definition of risk 10-yr risk of CVD events >10% Most men >50, women >60 yrs with smoking, HTN, dyslip, premature CVD fam hx, albuminuria 10-yr CVD risk <5% Men <50, women <60 yrs with no major add l CVD risk factors Younger patients with 1 risk factor Older pts with no risk factors Pts w/ 10-yr CVD risk 5 10% Pignone M, et al. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1395-1402.

감사합니다.