Microsoft Word - KSR2012A021.doc

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Microsoft Word - KSR2012A021.doc"

상길 낭
4 years ago
Views:

1 YWXY G ºG ºG t G G GGGGGGGGGrzyYWXYhWYXG Ÿƒ Ÿ ± k ¹Ÿˆ Review about the pantograph field test result adapted for HEMU-430X (1) ÕÕÛ äñ ã G Ki-Nam Kim, Tae-Hwan Ko * Abstract In this paper, explain differences about the performance of pantograph between verification results confirmed on development process and the running test result confirmed on-track test used comparative analysis. And, predict the running performance of a pantograph at the top speed test. In addition, for the HEMU-430X s top speed test & operation, we are propose about the pantograph s control scheme for the improvements and stabilization. Keywords : HEMU-430X, Pantograph my t ƒ v ƒº Ÿƒ Ÿ ª««ƒ ± k s ƒ ¹Ÿˆ ƒº ˆ zƒ Ÿ ƒr» ˆ ƒ± k ƒ y g Ÿƒ Ÿ ƒ ± k r ƒ m ƒ vƒ Ž ºp wž ˆ Ÿƒ Ÿ olt T[ZWSG ± k ää ï y t ƒ ¹ ˆ Ÿƒ Ÿ ª««± k ¹Ÿˆ v ƒ ˆ ¹Ÿˆ f py pº v ƒ m v zz ¹ ˆ ƒvƒ t v ƒ ˆ g» m ˆ vž º ƒ m l Ž zz ˆ G Ò å ÕÑ ã íõ Ó äãêêêêêæëëêêêêëéäéêäêëã ã Ó ãõ Ó äñ ã Ó G

2 äää Ôì àð ä äääääñî ä ääúï ª««± k s ± k ƒ ¹ ª ³ «g l ƒ º lˆ ƒ yª«ªª ƒ Fig. 1 Wind tunnel test at RTRI in Japan, Left : Close knee direction, Right : Open knee direction äääääñî ÑÑä lˆ ƒ ± k l ƒ ± k ƒ «d l ƒ º rsdˆ w w ª ½ ± k xº µ º «³ p r s l ƒ v ˆ r ˆ ƒ ˆ w ˆ «r ˆ ˆ Table 1 Test run configuration for Close knee direction Divide Direction Height of Panto. Airfoil Spoiler Test 701~706 Close knee Middle X X Test 101~106 Close knee Middle X O Test 201~206 Close knee Middle A1 O Test 801~806 Close knee Middle A1=20p O

Airfoil Spoiler Test 807~812 Close knee Middle A1=10p X Test 907~912 Open knee Middle A1=10p X Fig.

3 Fig. 2 Test result at the Close knee direction g ƒ w ˆ r ˆ Fig. 3 Test result at the Open knee direction ˆ pv«m«ƒ p ˆ r ˆ Table 2 Test run configuration for synchronize both direction Divide Direction Height of Panto. Airfoil Spoiler Test 807~812 Close knee Middle A1=10p X Test 907~912 Open knee Middle A1=10p X Fig. 4 Final configuration about the Airfoil angle on both direction lˆ epr ˆ «ƒ ± k w «ƒ p Table 3 Left force at the Test run 807 ~ 812 and 907 ~ 912 Divide 250 km/h 270 km/h 300 km/h 330 km/h 360 km/h 400 km/h Left force (N) Close knee Open knee

«epr l ± k Ž l l Ž ª p «ƒ ª ª l ƒ «ª g ««ª ƒ ³ l F mean ª m um lˆ epr ƒ ª ª ½ ˆ«wx Ž äää ä äääää Ôì ä ª««± k ª ª ƒ r w sdmƒ

5 Configuration about the HEMU-430X and pantograph installation position ˆ ª ± k p r ˆ ª ± k p äääää ÑÑä» ep± k ˆ Table 4

0, (36S) 265 117.97 20.91 201207150209 Date 2012.07.15 M4 03:27:15.4 03:27:54.4, (39S) 270 138.85 21.55 201207150309 2012.07.19 M4 02:27:49.

4 «epr l ± k Ž l l Ž ª p «ƒ ª ª l ƒ «ª g ««ª ƒ ³ l F mean ª m um lˆ epr ƒ ª ª ½ ˆ«wx Ž äää ä äääää Ôì ä ª««± k ª ª ƒ r w sdmƒ Ver.2 Ver.2 상행 Tc M1 M2 M3 M4 Mc 하행 Fig. 5 Configuration about the HEMU-430X and pantograph installation position ˆ ª ± k p r ˆ ª ± k p äääää ÑÑä» ep± k ˆ Table 4 Test result on HEMU-430X (1) Divide Pos. Data pick up time (km/h) F mean (N) σ (N) Remark M4 02:20: :20:43.0, (36S) Date M4 03:27: :27:54.4, (39S) M4 02:27: :28:26.2, (36S) M4 01:24: :24:54.4, (20S) Fig. 6 Data analysis result using the measuring system on HEMU-430X (1)

5 «epr ƒ³ l F mean ª «r ³Ÿ σ ª p º» ep± k ˆ «ƒ «ƒ Ÿk m ± k l zƒ º p z ºy s r º pzƒ Table 5 Test result on HEMU-430X (2) Divide Pos. Data pick up time (km/h) F mean (N) σ (N) Remark M1 00:44: :45:09:0, (21S) Date M1 00:52: :52:42.8, (16S) M1 01:29: :30:13.1, (66S) M1 03:21: :22:16.0, (68S) Fig. 7 Data analysis result using the measuring system on HEMU-430X (2) «ƒ epr ƒ³ l F mean ª «r ³Ÿ σ ª p º» ep± k ˆ «Table 6 Test result on HEMU-430X (3) Divide Pos. Data pick up time (km/h) F mean (N) σ (N) Remark M4 01:08: :09:52.9, (54S) Date M1 00:39: :40:22.8, (23S) M4 01:27: :27:28.8, (21S) M4 02:24: :24:49.5, (25S) Fig. 8 Data analysis result using the measuring system on HEMU-430X (3)

6 «ƒ eprž ƒ³ l F mean ª «r ³Ÿ σ ª p º ääñï ª««± k l ƒ º ª««Ÿk ƒ l ˆ r ˆ ƒž ª l ª º ekƒ ˆ ƒ d ³ l m l l l rž ª ½ vƒ m ˆ ep r ª««ƒ ± k µ ˆ Ÿk ƒ ˆ ¹ p y ª««l m ª ƒ r ª ± k l ƒ m g ± k l ƒˆ ³Ÿ xº ½ª «º ˆ ˆ ƒ epr z y p ƒv m± p p m ª«««ƒ «l s m ¹ ˆ epr ½l l ˆ«w m px Ž m± Õ y z vk v ƒ Ÿƒ v v v½ Ñö [1] Ki-Nam Kim, Yong-Hyeon Cho, Tae-Hwan Ko, Hyeon-Mog Jang. (2011) Verification about the HEMU Pantograph Performance of the Dynamics Behaviors, KSR Autumn conference, pp [2] Tae-Hwan Ko, Ki-Nam Kim, Seong-Ho Han. (2010) Numerical Simulation for an Airfoil and a Spoiler on Pantograph, KSR Autumn conference, pp [3] Chankyoung Park. (2010) A Study on the Evaluation of Pantograph Performance for High Train through the On-line Test Running, KSR Autumn conference, pp [4] EN50367:2006, Railway applications - Current collection system - Technical criteria for the interaction between pantograph and overhead line. [5] EN50119:2001, Railway applications - Fixed installations - Electric traction overhead contact lines.#

Microsoft Word - KSR2013A299

Microsoft Word - KSR2013A299 YWXZ º º t rzyywxzhy`` k Ž Ÿo r m ƒ 2 Flanged uide Wheels Tram Review Compliance Criteria of the Road Structure Ò ã ä ã ä ãã Kwang-Suk Seo *, Seung-Il Lee *, Oak-Young Song * * "CTUSBDUTram of the city