Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ"

승수 피
5 years ago
Views:

1 Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in University & 2 Kang Won University [Purpose] [Methods] [Results] [Conclusion] Key words: Ⅰ Ⅲ

2 Ⅲ Ⅲ

3 Ⅲ Table 1. Seasonal participants season competition method event N 25th (2009) overall th (2010) overall qualifier th (2011) semi qualifier th (2012) semi qualifier th (2013) semi qualifier th (2014) semi qualifier st (2015) semi qualifier nd (2016) semi qualifier rd (2017) semi total 6768

4 Fig. 1. example for scoring Table 2. events for season and competition method season 25th (2009) 26th (2010) 27th~ 28th (2011~ 2012) 29th~ 33rd (2013~ 2017) event standard parallel progressive parallel free progressive parallel middle progressive parallel combination progressive parallel Standard & Progressive parallel progressive parallel middle combination mogul combination progressive parallel qualifier progressive parallel middle Standard & Progressive parallel semi progressive parallel mogul progressive parallel combination combination progressive parallel qualifier progressive parallel middle Standard & Progressive parallel semi progressive parallel mogul Giant Slalom(gate) progressive parallel

5 Ⅲ Fig. 2. standard for scoring(ksia, 2017)

6 σ σ Table 3. analysis results 25th season combination (N=388) free (N=388) middle (N=388) carving (N=388) (N=388) (N=388) J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J p j p*j p j p*j p j p*j p j p*j p j p*j p j p*j

7 Table 4. analysis results 26th season J p middle J J j (N=333) J J p*j J p mogul (N=333) (N=333) combina tion (N=333) (N=333) J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J j p*j p j p*j p j p*j p j p*j Table 5. analysis results 27th season J p J J j J J p*j J p J combi J j nation J qualifier J p*j (N=362) J p J middle J j J J p*j J p J J j J J p*j J p J J j J semi J p*j (N=230) J p J Mogul J j J J p*j J p J combi J j nation J J p*j (N=120) J p J J j J J p*j

8 Table 6. analysis results 28th season J p J J j J J p*j J p combi J J j nation J qualifier J p*j (N=414) J p middle J J j J J p*j J p J J j J J p*j J p J J j semi J J p*j J (N=216) p J Mogul J j J J p*j J p combi J J j nation J J p*j (N=121) J p J J j J J p*j Table 7. analysis results 29th season J p J J j J p*j J J p combi J j J nation J qualifier p*j J (N=436) J p middle J j J J p*j J J p J j J J p*j J J p J j J semi J p*j J J p (N=270) J Mogul J j J p*j J J p J j J (N=162) J p*j J

9 Table 8. analysis results 30th season J p J J j J J p*j J p combi J J j nation J qualifier J p*j (N=475) J p middle J J j J J p*j J p J J j J J p*j J p J J j semi J J p*j J (N=283) p J Mogul J j J J p*j J p J J j (N=162) J J p*j Table 9. analysis results 31st season J p J J j J J p*j J p combi J J j nation J qualifier J p*j (N=462) J p middle J J j J J p*j J p J J j J J p*j J p J J j semi J J p*j J (N=276) p J Mogul J j J J p*j J p J J j (N=156) J J p*j

10 Table 10. analysis results 32nd season J p J J j J J p*j J p combi J J j nation J qualifier J p*j (N=348) J p middle J J j J J p*j J p J J j J J p*j J p J J j semi J J p*j J (N=272) p J Mogul J j J J p*j J p J J j (N=126) J J p*j Table 11. analysis results 33rd season J p J J j J J p*j J p combi J J j nation J qualifier J p*j (N=398) J p middle J J j J J p*j J p J J j J J p*j J p J J j semi J J p*j J (N=299) p J Mogul J j J J p*j J p J J j (N=134) J J p*j

11 Ⅱ

12 Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ

13 Ann. K. S. (2007). Appropriateness of Dance Performance Assessment by Trimmed Mean Method, Journal of Korea Sport Research, 18(5), Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. NY: Springer-Verlag. Bae. J. K.(2004) Fairness of Trimmed Mean Method for Assessing a Dance Performance. Korea sport research, 15(2), Baumgartner, T. A., & Jackson, A. S. (2006). Measurement for evaluation in physical education and exercise science (8th). Dubuque, IA : WCB McGraw-Hill. Cho. J. H. (2006). An analysis of sources of error and optimal condition of generalizability coefficient in the Korean national bowling player selective match. Korea journal of physical edcuation. 45(6), Choi. Y. S. (2010). Performance Assessment for Modern Dance Competitors of Dong-A Concours ( ). The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 12(2) Choi. Y. S. (2011). Analyzing the Judges rating in Modern Dance Competitors of Dong-A Concours through Many-Faceted Rasch Model. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 13(2) Cho. E. H. & Choi. Y. L. (2015). Analysis of Error Sources in Results of Evaluation of Difficulty(D) and Execution(E) by Judges of Rhythmic Gymnastics Competition. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 17(3), Cho. E. H. (2016). Analysis of error source in subjective evaluation results on Taekwondo Poomsae: Application of generalizability theory. Journal of the Korean data & information science society. 27(2), Kim. D. Y. & Heo. J. G. (2002). Generalizability Coefficient Estimation of Subjectively Volleyball Test. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science. 4(2), Kim. M. Y. (2003). Objectivity in the Judgement of Figure Skating Performance. Korea journal of physical education. 45(2), Kim. Y. J. & Kim. E. J. (2005) A Study on the Degree of Perfection and the Objectivity of Judges' Scores for Women's Gymnastics. Korea Sport Research, 16(5), Kim. W. K. (2007) Interjudge Objectivity of Taekwondo Poomsae Competition, Journal of Korea Sport Research, 18(4), Kim. H. D., Woo. D. I. & Kim. E. J. (2011) Objectivity of International Aerobics Referee decision. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 13(2), Korea Ski Instructor Association(2017) Lee. T. K., Lee. H. J., Chung. J. E. & Yang. H. W. (2016). Analysis of Judges Judging in Figure Skating, Korean Journal of Sport Science, 27(4), Moon. C. Y. (2006). Evaluation of Holistic Methods in Judgment of Sports Performance. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 8(2), Oh. S. H., Kim. S. J. & Lee. Y. K. (2001). An Objectivity of a Performance Assessment Instrument in Dance. The Korean Journal Of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sports Science, 3(1), Oh, S. H. & Lee. B. Y. (2002) Introduction to Objectivity and its Usage. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 4(1), 1-12.

14 Shin. J. Y., Cho. E. H. & Eom. H. J. (2015). An Objective Index for Subjective Judgements of Experts: Comparison of Inter-rater Agreement Coefficients. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 54(6), Seok. J. S., Kang. S. K. & Lee. J. H. (2016). Objectivity Evaluation of the Ski Level II Test. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 18(2),

Analysis of Judges Judging in Figure Skating Tae-Koo Lee, Han-Joo Lee, Jae-Eun Chung, & Hee-won Yang* Yonsei University

Analysis of Judges Judging in Figure Skating Tae-Koo Lee, Han-Joo Lee, Jae-Eun Chung, & Hee-won Yang* Yonsei University Table 1. Definition of the Program Components Factor Definition Overall skating