YWXY G ºG ºG t G G GGGGGGGGGrzyYWXYhWYXG Ÿƒ Ÿ ± k ¹Ÿˆ Review about the pantograph field test result adapted for HEMU-430X (1) ÕÕÛ äñ ã G Ki-Nam Kim, Tae-Hwan Ko * Abstract In this paper, explain differences about the performance of pantograph between verification results confirmed on development process and the running test result confirmed on-track test used comparative analysis. And, predict the running performance of a pantograph at the top speed test. In addition, for the HEMU-430X s top speed test & operation, we are propose about the pantograph s control scheme for the improvements and stabilization. Keywords : HEMU-430X, Pantograph my t ƒ v ƒº Ÿƒ Ÿ ª««ƒ ± k s ƒ ¹Ÿˆ ƒº ˆ zƒ Ÿ ƒr» ˆ ƒ± k ƒ y g Ÿƒ Ÿ ƒ ± k r ƒ m ƒ vƒ Ž ºp wž ˆ Ÿƒ Ÿ olt T[ZWSG ± k ää ï y t ƒ ¹ ˆ Ÿƒ Ÿ ª««± k ¹Ÿˆ v ƒ ˆ ¹Ÿˆ f py pº v ƒ m v zz ¹ ˆ ƒvƒ t v ƒ ˆ g» m ˆ vž º ƒ m l Ž zz ˆ G Ò å ÕÑ ã íõ Ó äãêêêêêæëëêêêêëéäéêäêëã ã Ó ãõ Ó äñ ã Ó G
äää Ôì àð ä äääääñî ä ääúï ª««± k s ± k ƒ ¹ ª ³ «g l ƒ º lˆ ƒ yª«ªª ƒ Fig. 1 Wind tunnel test at RTRI in Japan, Left : Close knee direction, Right : Open knee direction äääääñî ÑÑä lˆ ƒ ± k l ƒ ± k ƒ «d l ƒ º rsdˆ w w ª ½ ± k xº µ º «³ p r s l ƒ v ˆ r ˆ ƒ ˆ w ˆ «r ˆ ˆ Table 1 Test run configuration for Close knee direction Divide Direction Height of Panto. Airfoil Spoiler Test 701~706 Close knee Middle X X Test 101~106 Close knee Middle X O Test 201~206 Close knee Middle A1 O Test 801~806 Close knee Middle A1=20p O
Fig. 2 Test result at the Close knee direction g ƒ w ˆ r ˆ Fig. 3 Test result at the Open knee direction ˆ pv«m«ƒ p ˆ r ˆ Table 2 Test run configuration for synchronize both direction Divide Direction Height of Panto. Airfoil Spoiler Test 807~812 Close knee Middle A1=10p X Test 907~912 Open knee Middle A1=10p X Fig. 4 Final configuration about the Airfoil angle on both direction lˆ epr ˆ «ƒ ± k w «ƒ p Table 3 Left force at the Test run 807 ~ 812 and 907 ~ 912 Divide 250 km/h 270 km/h 300 km/h 330 km/h 360 km/h 400 km/h Left force (N) Close knee 58.3 65.7 83.9 103.6 126.2 161.8 Open knee 49.6 60.7 80.3 103.0 130.8 184.5
«epr l ± k Ž l l Ž ª p «ƒ ª ª l ƒ «ª g ««ª ƒ ³ l F mean ª m um lˆ epr ƒ ª ª ½ ˆ«wx Ž äää ä äääää Ôì ä ª««± k ª ª ƒ r w sdmƒ Ver.2 Ver.2 상행 Tc M1 M2 M3 M4 Mc 하행 Fig. 5 Configuration about the HEMU-430X and pantograph installation position ˆ ª ± k p r ˆ ª ± k p äääää ÑÑä» ep± k ˆ Table 4 Test result on HEMU-430X (1) Divide Pos. Data pick up time (km/h) F mean (N) σ (N) Remark 2012.07.15 M4 02:20:06.5 02:20:43.0, (36S) 265 117.97 20.91 201207150209 Date 2012.07.15 M4 03:27:15.4 03:27:54.4, (39S) 270 138.85 21.55 201207150309 2012.07.19 M4 02:27:49.7 02:28:26.2, (36S) 290 107.78 25.79 201207190208 2012.07.22 M4 01:24:34.9 01:24:54.4, (20S) 295 101.85 29.14 201207220057 Fig. 6 Data analysis result using the measuring system on HEMU-430X (1)
«epr ƒ³ l F mean ª «r ³Ÿ σ ª p º» ep± k ˆ «ƒ «ƒ Ÿk m ± k l zƒ º p z ºy s r º pzƒ Table 5 Test result on HEMU-430X (2) Divide Pos. Data pick up time (km/h) F mean (N) σ (N) Remark 2012.07.29 M1 00:44:48.1 00:45:09:0, (21S) 272 100.86 17.99 201207290025 Date 2012.08.02 M1 00:52:26.4 00:52:42.8, (16S) 290 101.48 19.00 201208020023 2012.08.02 M1 01:29:07.1 01:30:13.1, (66S) 297 84.56 28.41 201208020109 2012.08.02 M1 03:21:08.8 03:22:16.0, (68S) 297 100.83 19.20 201208020253 Fig. 7 Data analysis result using the measuring system on HEMU-430X (2) «ƒ epr ƒ³ l F mean ª «r ³Ÿ σ ª p º» ep± k ˆ «Table 6 Test result on HEMU-430X (3) Divide Pos. Data pick up time (km/h) F mean (N) σ (N) Remark 2012.08.12 M4 01:08:58.1 01:09:52.9, (54S) 299 75.73 28.93 201208120046 Date 2012.08.16 M1 00:39:59.1 00:40:22.8, (23S) 294 102.63 21.64 201208160023 2012.08.19 M4 01:27:01.7 01:27:28.8, (21S) 316.5 93.17 29.15 201208190110 2012.08.18 M4 02:24:24.8 02:24:49.5, (25S) 318 102.65 33.00 201208190204 Fig. 8 Data analysis result using the measuring system on HEMU-430X (3)
«ƒ eprž ƒ³ l F mean ª «r ³Ÿ σ ª p º ääñï ª««± k l ƒ º ª««Ÿk ƒ l ˆ r ˆ ƒž ª l ª º ekƒ ˆ ƒ d ³ l m l l l rž ª ½ vƒ m ˆ ep r ª««ƒ ± k µ ˆ Ÿk ƒ ˆ ¹ p y ª««l m ª ƒ r ª ± k l ƒ m g ± k l ƒˆ ³Ÿ xº ½ª «º ˆ ˆ ƒ epr z y p ƒv m± p p m ª«««ƒ «l s m ¹ ˆ epr ½l l ˆ«w m px Ž m± Õ y z vk v ƒ Ÿƒ v v v½ Ñö [1] Ki-Nam Kim, Yong-Hyeon Cho, Tae-Hwan Ko, Hyeon-Mog Jang. (2011) Verification about the HEMU Pantograph Performance of the Dynamics Behaviors, KSR Autumn conference, pp. 230-237. [2] Tae-Hwan Ko, Ki-Nam Kim, Seong-Ho Han. (2010) Numerical Simulation for an Airfoil and a Spoiler on Pantograph, KSR Autumn conference, pp. 1541-1546. [3] Chankyoung Park. (2010) A Study on the Evaluation of Pantograph Performance for High Train through the On-line Test Running, KSR Autumn conference, pp. 12-17. [4] EN50367:2006, Railway applications - Current collection system - Technical criteria for the interaction between pantograph and overhead line. [5] EN50119:2001, Railway applications - Fixed installations - Electric traction overhead contact lines.#