제 13 권제 1 호 ( ) 1),.,,,. 2),. 3), ( 3, 4 ).,.., (, ),.,.,. 1) ,,. 16, 65,. 2) )

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "제 13 권제 1 호 ( ) 1),.,,,. 2),. 3), ( 3, 4 ).,.., (, ),.,.,. 1) ,,. 16, 65,. 2) )"

서희 곡
6 years ago
Views:

1 불법쟁의행위와민사책임 ( 문무기 ) , , pp ),.,.,,.,.,,,.,,..,,.,. * ( ), , mgmoon@kli.re.kr

2 제 13 권제 1 호 ( ) 1),.,,,. 2),. 3), ( 3, 4 ).,.., (, ),.,.,. 1) ,,. 16, 65,. 2) )

3 불법쟁의행위와민사책임 ( 문무기 ) , %, 80%. ( 단위 : 개소, 백만원 ) 전 체 손해배상 기업수 금액 16,498 22,781 18,481 57,760 가압류 기업수 금액 23,059 38,165 68, ,005 전체 금액 39,557 60,946 87, ,765 출처 : 노동부가지방노동관서를통하여조사한자료., ( ),. 4).,,, ( ) ( 4) , ( ).

4 제 13 권제 1 호 ).,.,,. ( ).,.,,. ( ),. ( ). 5),. 5) , , 32835( ) ;,.

5 불법쟁의행위와민사책임 ( 문무기 ) 73. ( ) 1,. 6).., ( ),. 7) ( ). 8),,. 9),.,. 6) , ;,,..,,,. 7),,, 2002, ;,,, 1999, ;,,, 1999, ;,,, 1996, ),,, 1996, ( ). 9), II,, 1996,

6 제 13 권제 1 호, ( ). ( ) 10) (,,, ).,.. 11).,., ( ), ( ). 12) ( ),. 13) ( 10) , ) ( ) , ),, ( 9 ),, , ),,, 8, , 199.

7 불법쟁의행위와민사책임 ( 문무기 ) 75 ) 3.,. (Veranlasser), ( (Ausführende)). 14), (BGB) 54,. 1919, ( 15) ), 831 ( 16) ) ( ). (le droit de gréve) ( ).,. 14) BAG Urtl. vom , AP Nr. 2 zu Art. 9 GG Arbeitskampf. 15) ) 756.

8 제 13 권제 1 호 ( ),., (,, ) 17). 1970, 1982 (Conseil constitution- nel) ( ) 8, (promulgation) ,. 18) ( ). ( ) (conspiracy)., ( ) Taff-Vale 19) ( ) (vicarious liability). 1906, ) Jean Pélissier et autres, op. cit., p ). 8,. 19) The Taff Vale Railway Company v. The Amalgamated Society of Railway Servant(1901), A. C. 426.

9 불법쟁의행위와민사책임 ( 문무기 ) ( ) (Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act, 1992) ( 20 2 )., ( 21 ). ( 22 ), ( 23 ). 20) ( 단위 : 파운드 ) 조합원수 1992 년통합법 1971 년노사관계법 5,000 명미만 10,000 5,000 5,000~25,000 명미만 50,000 25,000 25,000~100,000 명미만 125,000 50, ,000 명이상 250, ,000 (NLRA), (unfair labor practice) Commonwealth v. Hunt 21),.. NLRA 7,, 20). 21) Commonwealth v. Hunt, 45 Mass.(4 Met.) 111, (1842).; (Means-Ends Test).

10 제 13 권제 1 호. NLRA NLRB NLRB,., NLRA.,..,,. ( = )... 22). ( ), ( ) , ( ). 23) 22),,, 1993, ;, ( ),, 1988, ;,,, ) ;

11 불법쟁의행위와민사책임 ( 문무기 ) 79,..,.. 24).,,,. 25) 26), 1., ( ). ( ). 24),, ( ). 37 ( 1 ), ( 2 ). 38, 41, ). 26),.

12 제 13 권제 1 호,.,..,.,.,.. 27).,. 27) ( ) ( , ( )), ( , ( ); , ( ); , ( )), ( , ( ); , ( )), ( , ( )) ( , ( ); , ( )).

13 불법쟁의행위와민사책임 ( 문무기 ) ,.,.,.,. 28),. 29),. ( 280 ). ( 3 ) 28) , ( 33, 3 ),, ( ( ), ),. 29),,,.

14 제 13 권제 1 호.,.,. 30),.,. 50% ( ),.. 50%, ( ) 31), 32).,. ( 50%).,.,..,. 30) ( ) ( ),.,,,,,. 31) 2003 ( ) ) , 2 59, 3 81,

15 불법쟁의행위와민사책임 ( 문무기 ) 83.,. ( ). ( 6 ).. ( ),.,., (,,,, ).,,.....

16 제 13 권제 1 호.,. 1.,,, , II,, ,,, , ( ),, ,,, ,, 9,, ,,, ,, 9,, ,, 9,, ,, 19,, ,,, ,, 8, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, , ( ),, ,,, 1992.

17 불법쟁의행위와민사책임 ( 문무기 ) 85 abstract Industrial actions are guaranteed by the Constitution as basic rights in Korea. However illegal strikes are subject to severe criminal liability or harsh punishment. But they seem to be not effective enough for workers to deter strikes. Employees are reluctant to share responsibility for the losses incurred due to labor strikes. In an effort to address this problem, claims for huge sums of damages and injunctions(temporary attachment) by employers are largely raised as controling methods of strikes after However trade unions harshly criticize it, branding it as a new repression of the labor movement." These methods have become another factor that exacerbate labor relations. There are several cases ruled by the Supreme Court concerning claims for damages and injunctions. But regarding the extent of the claim, individual or collective liabilities, cause-result relationship, and burden of proof, there are no firmly set legal principles, and there have not been many relevant cases. Examples from other countries reveal that the extent of civil liability for illegal strikes depended on the historical background, socio-economic, legal and political circumstances of each country. The fundamental direction of the issue of civil liability for illegal strikes must consider harmony of the right to industrial actions for workers and the right of property for employers. The enlargement of extent for legitimacy of industrial actions, mitigation of criminal and civil liability for illegal strikes, improvement of legal system and customary for injunctions(temporary attachment), improvement of personal reference system will be considered as alternative measures. In addition, enhancement of voluntary agreement between labor and management, holding accountable for industrial actions on their each part will be asked for. On the part of the government, it faces challenge of reconciling labor-management relations through fair and impartial administrative services.

18 제 13 권제 1 호 Keyword: industrial action, illegal strike, civil liability, claim for damage, injunction (temporary attachment)

:,,,,, 서론 1), ) 3), ( )., 4) 5), 1).,,,. 2) ( ) ) ( 121, 18 ).

:,,,,, 서론 1), ) 3), ( )., 4) 5), 1).,,,. 2) ( ) ) ( 121, 18 ). 41 2015 2 Korea Administrative Law Theory Practice Association Administrative Law Journal Vol. 41, Feb. 2015 학교회계직원의사용자에대한고찰및입법정책적검토 사법상권리의무의주체와단체교섭사용자적격의관련성을중심으로 1) 이종범 * ㆍ박동열. ( ),.,. 2013. 1. 15. 201228346.,...,,.,.,.,.