: 15 1 Vol. 15, No. 1, April, 1999 = Abstract = A Clinical Analysis of Chronic Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease Jin Myoung Huh, M.D., Woo Hyung Kwun, M.D.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download ": 15 1 Vol. 15, No. 1, April, 1999 = Abstract = A Clinical Analysis of Chronic Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease Jin Myoung Huh, M.D., Woo Hyung Kwun, M.D."

형민 노
5 years ago
Views:

1 : 15 1 Vol. 15, No. 1, April, 1999 = Abstract = A Clinical Analysis of Chronic Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease Jin Myoung Huh, M.D., Woo Hyung Kwun, M.D., Bo Yang Suh, M.D. and Koing Bo Kwun, M.D. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Chronic Aorto-Iliac Occlusive Disease (CAIOD) commonly occurs in conjunction with obstruction in the femoral and popliteal arteries, resulting in ischemia of the lower extremities. To analyze the characteristics of CAIOD among Koreans, we relied on 110 cases of aorto-iliac occlusive disease in-patients who underwent operative treatment at Yeungnam university hospital during the last 15 years. Among the 110 total cases, the mean age was 61, with the highest incidence among people in their 60s, followed by those in their 50 s and then in their 70 s. 88.2% of the cases occurred in males with the remaining 11.8% occurring among females. Co-existing diseases included hypertension 46 cases (41.8% of the cases), coronary arterial diseases 17 cases (15.4%), diabetes mellitus 22 cases (20%), chronic pulmonary diseases 14 cases (12.7%) and cerebrovascular diseases 10 cases (9.1%). 80% of the cases involved patients with a history of smoking. The level of serum total cholesterol was higher than normal in 32.7% of cases. Advanced arteriosclerotic manifestation was found in over two-thirds of the cases, with the anatomical distribution as follows: Type I 5 cases (4.5%), Type II 30 cases (27.3%) and Type III 75 cases (68.2%). According to the Fontaine classification of clinical symptoms, the distribution was as follows: Grade I (0 case), Grade II 52 cases (47.3%), Grade III 36 cases (32.7%) and Grade IV 22 cases (20.0%). Among the 110 cases, 75 received only inflow procedures, 19 received both inflow and outflow procedures at the same time, and 16 received only outflow procedures. Among the 94 cases of inflow procedures, PTA accounted for 11 cases, PTA with stent accounted for 5, endarterectomy for 3, and bypass operations for 75. The breakdown for the 75 cases of bypass operations was as follows: aortofemoral or aortoiliac (21 cases): iliofemoral (12 cases): extraanatomic bypass including axillobifemoral bypass (15 cases): and fem-fem bypass (27 cases). Thirty-five outflow procedures included femoropopliteal and femorotibial bypass (22 cases), thromboembolectomy (6 cases), endarterectomy (5 cases) and profundoplasty (2 cases). 19 out of these 35 outflow procedures were performed in conjunction with inflow procedures at the time of the initial operation, but 16 were used without inflow procedure, mainly for Type III cases with relatively mild aortoiliac pathology. In over 90% of the 110 operative cases, the early outcome was good with 3 to 2 rating according to Rutherford criteria. The early outcome seemed to be related to the extent of disease and preoperative clinical symptoms but not with the surgical procedures used. 45

2 46 : Among the 110 total cases, 26 (23.6%) required second procedures. Among the 94 cases of inflow procedures, 24 (25.5%) required the second procedures, while among the 16 cases of outflow procedures, 2 (12.5%) required the second procedures. Among the 94 cases of inflow procedures, the need for second operations was higher in cases undergoing both inflow and outflow procedure at the same time (36.8%, 7 out of 19 cases) compared to the cases that underwent inflow procedure only (22.6%, 17 out of 75 cases). Among the inflow procedures, axillofemoral (46.7%) and iliofemoral (41.7%) bypass required the 2nd procedures much more frequently than aorto-fem (23.8%), fem-fem (14.8%) bypass and PTA (18.8%). An overall 5-year cumulative patency rate demonstrated significant statistical differences between procedures (p=0.001 Log Rank test): aortofemoral or aortoiliac: 0.81, fem-fem: 0.77, PTA: 0.74, iliofemoral: 0.56, and axillofemoral: A 5-year cumulative patency rate also showed a significant correlation with the extent of disease (p=0.01), preoperative ischemic symptoms (p=0.05) and Ankle Brachial pressure Index (ABI.). Operative mortality for the 110 cases was 3.6% (4 cases), including 3 resulting from associated cardiac conditions and 1 resulting from aortoduodenal fistula. Key Words: Aortoiliac occlusive disease, Clinical analysis,, Leriche1),, dos Santos2) 1952 Oudot,3) DeBakey,4) Dubost5) DeBakey6).,,. -, ,, Doppler test, - 110,,,,

3 Brewster7) Type I, Type II, Type III. Fontine Classification8) Grade I (Asymptomatic) Grade II (Intermittent claudication), Grade III (Rest pain), Grade IV (Gangrene or Non-healing ulcer). Rutherford 8). 1 ABI (Ankle brachial Index) (markedly improvement), (moderately improvement), (minimal improvement), (no change), (mildly worse), (moderately worse), (markedly worse).,, Doppler, Duplex scan. Chi-square test, 5 Kaplan-meier test Log-rank test. 1) , 60 50, 70, 40. Table 1. Age and sex distribution of patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease No. of patient (Male/Female) Age group Total (M/F) Type I Type II Type III /0 2/0 3/ /0 4/0 7/1 12/ /0 11/0 16/1 29/ /1 9/1 25/3 35/ /0 2/2 14/4 16/ /0 0/0 2/0 2/0 Total 4/1 27/3 66/9 97/13 Table 2. Comparative analysis of age and clinical symptoms (Table 1)., 30, 70 Grade IV (p=0.03 Chi-square test) (Table 2).. 2) Brewster Type I 5 (4.5%), Type II 30 (27.3%), Type III 75 (68.2%) Type Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade (33.3%) 2 (66.7%) 40 7 (50.0%) 6 (42.9%) 1 (7.1%) (62.1%) 7 (24.1%) 4 (13.8%) (52.5%) 12 (30.0%) 7 (17.5%) 70 5 (22.7%) 9 (40.9%) 8 (36.4%) 80 2 (100%) (p=0.03 Chi-square test) III (Table 1), Grade III, IV Type III (p=0.009, Chi-square test) (Table 3).

48 : 15 1 1999 Table 3. Comparative analysis of anatomical type and clinical symptoms. 3) Grade I 0, Grade II 52 (47.3%), Grade III 36 (32.7%), Grade IV 22 (20.0%) (Fig. 1),.

4 48 : Table 3. Comparative analysis of anatomical type and clinical symptoms. 3) Grade I 0, Grade II 52 (47.3%), Grade III 36 (32.7%), Grade IV 22 (20.0%) (Fig. 1),. 4) 46, 22, 17, 10, 14 (Table 4), 89 (80.9%). 36 Total cholesterol 200 mg/dl. 5) Type I Type II Type III Grade 2 3 (5.8%) 22 (42.3%) 27 (51.9%) Grade 3 2 (5.6%) 4 (11.1%) 30 (83.3%) Grade 4 4 (18.2%) 18 (81.8%) (p=0.009, Chi-square test) Fig. 1. Distribution of clinical symptoms (Inflow procedure) 16 (Outflow procedure), (PTA, Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty) 5 Table 4. Associated diseases Associated disease No. of patients (%) Hypertension* 46 (41.8%) Diabetes mellitus 22 (20.0%) Cardiologic disease 22 (20.0%) Coronary arterial disease (17 ) Congestive heart failure (4 ) Rheumatoid heart disease (1 ) Chronic Pulmonary disease 14 (12.7%) COPD** (8 ) Asthma (3 ) Malignancy (2 ) Bronchiectasis (1 ) Cerebrovascular disease 10 (9.0%) Other ASO*** 6 (5.4%) Others Hyperthyroidism (1 ) Stomach malignancy (1 ) Hypercholestolemia**** 36 (32.7%) *Hypertension: Blood pressure 150/90 mmhg, **COPD: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, ***ASO: Arteriosclerosis obliterans, ****Hypercholestolemia: Serum Total Cholesterol Level 200 mg/dl Table 5. Inflow procedures for Aorto-iliac occlusive disease Procedures Stent. 3 (Endarterectomy), No of patients PTA 16 Endarterectomy 3 Aortic bypass 21 Aorto-Bifemoral bypass 11 Aorto-unifemoral bypass 5 Aorto-Biiliac bypass 1 Aorto-Uniiliac bypass 2 Aorto-Bipopliteal bypass 2 Ilio-femoral bypass 12 Extraantomical bypass 42 Axillo-unifemoral bypass 1 Axillo-Bifemoral bypass 14 Fem-Fem bypass (Bypass operation).

5 3 49 Aorto- Bifemoral bypass 11, Aorto-Unifemoral bypass 5, Aorto-Biiliac bypass 1, Aorto-Uniilac bypass 2, Aorto-Bipopliteal bypass 2, Iliofemoral bypass 12, Axillo-unifemoral bypass 1, Axillo-Bifemoral bypass 14, Fem-Fem bypass 27 (Table 5) Table 6. Outflow procedures for Aorto-iliac occlusive diseases Procedures No of patients Adjunctive outflow procedure 19 Fem-Popliteal bypass 11 Endarterectomy 5 Profundoplasty 1 Thromboembolectomy 2 Outflow procedure 16 Fem-Popliteal bypass 9 Fem-Tibial bypass 2 Profundoplasty 1 Thromboembolectomy 4. Femoro-Popliteal bypass 11, Endarterectomy 5, Profundoplasty 1, Thromboembolectomy Type III Femoro-Popliteal bypass 9, Femorotibial bypass 2, Profundoplasty 1, Thromboembolectomy 4 (Table 6)., Graft 62 PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene) 21 Dacron 83 Table 7. Early outcome of treatment for Aorto-iliac occlusive diseases (n=142) Outcome No. of limbs (%) Markedly improved 87 (61.3%) Moderately improved 48 (33.8%) Minimally improved 3 (2.1%) No change 0 Mildly worse 0 Moderately worse 2 (1.4%) Markedly worse 2 (1.4%) Table 8. Comparative analysis of anatomical type and early clinical outcome Type I 7 (77.8%) 2 (22.2%) Type II 32 (84.2%) 5 (13.2%) 1 (2.6%) Type III 48 (50.5%) 41 (43.2%) 3 (3.2%) 2 (2.1%) 1 (1.1%) (p=0.04, Chi-square test) Table 9. Comparative analysis of clinical grade and early clinical outcome Grade 2 46 (66.7%) 23 (33.3%) Grade 3 29 (63.0%) 15 (32.6%) 2 (4.3%) Grade 4 12 (44.4%) 10 (37.0%) 1 (3.7%) 2 (7.4%) 2 (7.4%) (p=0.006, Chi-square test)

50 : 15 1 1999 Table 10. Comparative analysis of preoperative ABI and early clinical outcome 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 0.5 37 (48.7%) 36 (47.7%) 2 (2.6%) 1 (1.3%) 0.5 44 (88.0%) 6 (12.0%) (p=0.

6 50 : Table 10. Comparative analysis of preoperative ABI and early clinical outcome (48.7%) 36 (47.7%) 2 (2.6%) 1 (1.3%) (88.0%) 6 (12.0%) (p=0.000, Chi-square test) Fig. 2. Cumulative patency rate of all cases. Fig. 3. Cumulative patency rate of alternate procedures (p=0.004, Log rank test). 16 (Greater saphenous vein). 2 Reverse bypass, 14 In situ bypass. 6) % (Table 7).,, ABI (Ankle-brachial Index) (Table 8 10),,. Fig. 4. Comparative cumulative patency rate of anatomical pattern (p=0.008, Log rank test). 7) 5 Kaplan-meier test , , 36, 48, (Fig. 2). 5 Aorto-Fem or Iliac bypass 0.81, Fem-Fem bypass 0.77, PTA 0.74, Ilio-Fem bypass 0.56, Axillo-Fem bypass 0.50 (Fig. 3)., (Fig. 4, 5). ABI ABI 0.5

3 51 graft. Intestinal obstruction Transabdominal approach Aorto-Bifemoral bypass. 9) Fig. 5. Comparative cumulative patency rate of clinical grade (p=0.03, Log rank test).

7 3 51 graft. Intestinal obstruction Transabdominal approach Aorto-Bifemoral bypass. 9) Fig. 5. Comparative cumulative patency rate of clinical grade (p=0.03, Log rank test). 4 3, 1 Aortoduodenal fistula 6. Aorto- Fem bypass 2, 1 Axillo-Fem bypass, 1 Fem-Tibial bypass. Fig. 6. Comparative cumulative patency rate of preoperative ABI (p=0.17, Log rank test). (Fig. 6). 8) 6 Graft Fem bypass graft 1 Graft. Pseudoaneurysm Aorto-Popliteal infection 4, Pseudoaneurysm 1, Intestinal obstruction 1. Graft infection 4 Axillo-Bifemoral bypass graft 3, Ilio- bypass 27 Pseudoaneurysm resection Greater saphenous vein Fem-Tibial reverse bypass,.9),, multilevel occlusive disease.,,.,. Brewster7) Type I, Type II Type III Type I 5 10%, Type II 25%, Type III 65%.10) Type I,,, 30 50%.7) 1923 Leriche1),,

8 52 : ,, Type I Leriche syndrome. Type I Type III, (Type IV hyperlipoproteinemia) 11).. Type III, Type I,,,.7,12) (36.3%), (27.2%), (20.0%), (11.8%) , ,13 17),. Type I 5 (4.5%), Type II 30 (27.3%), Type III 75 (68.2%).10,13 17) Fontine classification Grade I 0, Grade II 52 (47.3%), Grade III 36 (32.7%), Grade IV 22 (20.0%). 40 (50.0%) 50 (62.1%) Grade II, Grade III, Grade IV. Type III Grade III, Grade IV (p=0.009),. 46 (41.8%), 22 (20.0%), 17 (15.0%), 10 (9.0%), 14 (12.7%) Szilagyi,13) Eugene,18) Bartlet19) ( %) dos Santos2) 1951 Oudot,3) Dubost,4) DeBakey5) DeBakey6) Freeman, Leeds,20) Vetto21) , Blaisdell, Hall,22) Louw23) , 1970.,,, thrombosis late failure.,,, Type cm.24,25) PTA 1964 Dotter Judkins26),. PTA.27) PTA.28,29) -

9 3 53.,.24,30) -.,,, -, graft,. Inferior mesentery artery,,.10,17,31,32), -,. -,,.21,33,34) - graft, - graft 2,.34 36),. Type III. Type III,, ,38) graft graft graft Type III.39,40) Melone,41) Mozersky42) Type III 60 80%. Type III Grade III, Grade IV 19, - 11, 5, 1, thromboembolectomy (markedly improvement) 87 (61.3%), (moderately improvement) 48 (33.8%), (minimal improvement) 3 (2.1%), (moderately worse) 2 (1.4%), (markedly worse) 2 (1.4%) 95%. (P=0.04), (P=0.006), ABI (P=0.000),,,..

10 54 : Kaplan-meier test , , 36, 48, ,. ABI, ABI , , PTA 0.74, , , 4 graft infection. - 3, - 1, graft. pseudoaneurysm 1-27 pseudoaneurysm saphenous vein -. 1 intestinal obstrution transabdomimal approach -. 4, 3 1 aorto-duodenal fistula 6. 50%.43) 4 3., ,, , Type I 5 (4.5%), Type II 30 (27.3%), Type III 75 (68.2%) Type III. Fontaine Classification grade II 52 (47.3%), grade III 36 (32.7%), grade IV 22 (20.0%). 110 (94 ) (PTA: 16 ). 3, 75 (inflow procedure). - - (21 ), - (12 ), - (15 ), - (27 ). (outflow procedure) % Rutherford,. (p=0.04, Chi-square test) (p=0.006, Chi-square test). 5 (p=0.004, Log rank test) , , PTA 0.74, , , (p= 0.008, Log rank test) (p=0.03, Log rank test). 4 3, 1

11 3 55 aorto-duodenal fistula.,,, Type III. REFERENCES 1) Leriche R, Morel A: The syndrome of thrombotic obliteration of the aortic bifurcation. Ann Surg 127: 193, ) Dos Santos JC: Sur la desobstruction des thromboses arterielle anciennes. Mem Acad Chir 73: 409, ) Oudot J: La greffe vasculaire dans les thromboses due carrefour aortique. Press Med 59: 234, ) Debarkey ME, Creech O Jr, Cooley DA: Occlusive disease of the aorta and its treatment by resection and homograft replacement. Ann Surg 140: 290, ) Dubost C, Allary M, Occonomos N: Resection of an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta: Reestablishment of the continuity by a preserved human arterial graft, with result after five months. Arch Surg 64: 405, ) Debarkey ME, Cooley DA, et al: Clinical application of a new flexible knitted Dacron arterial substitute. Am Surg 24: 862, ) Brewster DC: Clinical and anatomic considerations for surgery in aortoiliac disease and results of surgical treatment. Circulation 83(sup I): 42, ) Rutheford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, Johnston KE, et al: Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: Revised Version. J Vasc Surg 26: 517, ) Valdoni P, Venturini A: Considerations on late results of vascular prostheses for reconstructive surgery in congenital and acquired arterial disease. J Cardivasc Surg 5: 509, ) Brewster DC, Darling RC: Optimal methods of aortoiliac reconstruction. Surgery 84: 739, ) Darling RC, Brewster DC, Hallett JW Jr, Darling RC III: Aortoiliac reconstruction. Surg Clin North Am 59: 565, ) Imperato AM, Sanoudos G, Epstein JH, Abrams RM, et al: Results in 96 aortoiliac reconstructive procedure: Preoperative angiographs and functional classification used as prognostic guides. Surgery 84: 610, ) Szilagyi DE, Elliott JP Jr, Smith RF, Reddy DJ, et al: A thirty-years survey of the reconstructive surgical treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 3: 421, ) Crawford ES, Bomberger RA, Glaeser DH, Saleh SA, et al: Aortoiliac occlusive disease: Factors influencing survival and function following reconstructive operation over twenty-five year period. Surgry 90: 1055, ) Perdue GD, Long WD, Smith RB III: Perspective concerning aortofemoral arterial reconstruction. Ann Surg 173: 940, ) Hill DA, McGrath MA, Lord RSA, Tracey GD: The effect of superficial femoral artery occlusion on the outcome of aortofemoral bypass for intermittent claudication. Surgery 87: 133, ) Dean RH, Foster JH: Aortoiliac occlusive disease: Fifteen years' operative experience. S Med J 66: 813, ) Eugene J, Goldstone J, Moore WS: Fifteen year experience with subcutaneous bypass grafts for lower extremity ischemia. Ann Surg 186: 177, ) Bartlett FF, Gibbons GW, Weelock FC Jr: Aortic reconstruction for occlusive disease. Arch Surg 121: 1150, ) Freeman NE, Leeds FH: Operations on large arteries. Calif Med 77: 229, ) Vetto RM: The treatment of unilateraliliac artery obstruction with a transabdominal, subcutaneous, femorofemoral graft. Surgery 52: 343, ) Blaisdell FW, Hall AD: Axillary-femoral artery bypass for lower extremity ischemia. Surgery 54: 563, ) Louw JH: The treatment of combined Aorto-iliac and femoropopliteal occlusive disease by splenofemoral and axillofemoral bypass graft. Surgery 55: 387, ) Johnston KW: Aortoiliac reconstruction, 76th ACS postgraduate course. Peripheral Vascular Surgery 17: 9, ) Dos Santos JC: From embolectomy to endartrectomy on the fall a myth. J Cardivasc Surg 17: 113, ) Dotter CT, Judkins MP: Transluminal treatment of arteriosclerotic obstruction: Description of a new technique and a preliminary report of its application. Circulation 30: 654, ) Health and Public Committee: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Ann Intern Med 99: 864, ) Martine EC, Frnkuchen EI, Karlson KB: Angioplasty for femoral artery occlusion. Comparison with surgery. AJR 137: 915, 1981

12 56 : ) Morin JF, Johnston KW, Wasserman L: Factors that determine the long-term result of percutaneous transluminal dilatation for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 4: 68, ) Darling RC, Brewster DC, Hallett JW Jr: Aortoiliac reconstruction. Surg Clin N Am 149: 676, ) Gaylis H: Aortoiliac bypass grafting: end to end or end to side anastomosis. S Afr J Surg 11: 45, ) Brewster DC, Frnklin DP, Darling RC: Intestinal ischemia complicating abdominal aortic surgery. Surgery 109: 447, ) Fahal AH, McDonald AM, Marston A: A femorofemoral bypass in unilateral iliac artery occlusion. Br J Surg 76: 22, ) Plecha FR, Pories WJ: Extraanatomical bypasses for aortoiliac disease in high risk patients. Surgery 80: 480, ) Mannick JA, Nabseth DC: Axillofemoral bypass graft, a safe alternative to aortoiliac reconstruction. N Engl J Med 278: 461, ) Johnson WC, Logerofo FW, Vollman RW: Is axillobilateral femoral graft an effective substitute for aorto-bilateral iliac/femoral graft? An analysis of ten years experience. Ann Surg 186: 123, ) Brewster DC, Perier BH, Robison JC: Aortofemoral graft for the multiple occlusive disease. Predictors of success and need for distal bypass. Arch Surg 117: 1593, ) Raines JK, Darling RC, Buth J: Vascular laboratory criteria for the management of peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremity. Surgery 72: 21, ) Dardik H, Ibraham IM, Jarrah M: Synchronous aortofemoral or iliofemoral bypass with revascularization of the lower extremity. Surg Gynecol Obstet 149: 646, ) O' Donnel TF Jr, McBride KA, Callow AD: Management of combined segmental disease. Am J Surg 141: 452, ) Melone JM, Moore WS, Goldstein J: The natural history of bilateral aortofemoral bypass grafts for ischemia of the lower extremities. Arch Surg 110: 1300, ) Mozersky DJ, Summer DS, Strandnes DE: Long-term results of reconstructive aortic surgery. Am J Surg 123: 503, ) Crawford ES, Bomberger RA, Glaeser DH, Saleh SA, et al: Aortoiliac occlusive disease: Factors influencing survival and function following reconstructive operation over 25 year period. Surgery 90: 1055, 1981

637

637 Peripheral Arterial Disease Yong Bok Koh, M.D. Department of General Surgery The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Kangnam St. Mary s Hospital E mail : ybkoh@catholic.ac.kr Abstract Peripheral