歯86박춘경.PDF

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "歯86박춘경.PDF"

유천 아
7 years ago
Views:

1 200 A Simple Two-Phase Critical Flow Model for Long Pipes,,, 05 flashing, L/D flashing Abstract A simple two-phase critical flow model is developed for estimating flashing flow rates through breaches in vessels or pipeworks The model considers both subcooled and saturated conditions The model has been tested against an extensive set of data from critical flow experiments with water as the test fluid In addition, comparison of the predictions with other theoretical models is made Results show that present model adequately predicts flashing flow rates through long pipes or large L/D geometries flashing, nozzle, slit -, [] Richter [2] general drift flux (GSL) [] space-dependent model, Marviken [3] [] slit [4,5]

2 ,, 2 (,,, ) (G c ) (T o ) [4,5] (G * ) ( T* sub ) : G G * G c ref T T sat o T * sub (2) Tsat Tref, [ 2 ( P P )] G = ( Cd ) ρref o b ref ( C d ) ref ref = + K + f L D 05 ref 05 G ref (C d (P o P b ) T ref = 20 C (discharge coefficient) G* T* sub [4,5]: 52 G * = (5) * + exp[( ) / 088] T sub slit : Gc = ( Cd [ 2ρ ( Po Pb )] ref (6) + exp ( T * ) / 088 sub (,, receiving end pressure) (C d 6 : x x G = o + o 3 TP (7) 3 3 G G = 0 x o = x o () (3) (4)

3 G x, 6 o = 0 = 00 T* sub G : x o = 2 k + 2k P 2 2 o k k G x = = Cdg (8) o k vo k + k C dg 2, (C d C dg K f [4,6,7] (C d 4,, (C d 6 C dg (C d (C d, ( X ) ( σ ) : n X i i= X = n 2 (9) 05 n 2 ( X ) i X σ = 00 % (0) i= n Gexp Gcorr X i = 00 % () Gexp i G exp G corr, n 3 (6 )

4 , 3 Table 284, 0 ~ 62 MPa, 025 ~ 509 mm, 40 ~ 2,335 mm 6 Table 8 % 0 %,,, (7 ) 267, 30 ~ 00 MPa, 52 mm 762 mm, 76 mm,778 mm (Table 2 ) Table Predictions of the subcooled inlet critical flow data with the Park model Experiment Pressure (MPa) Hydraulic Diameter, D (mm) Flow Length, L (mm) L/D No of Data X (%) Amos et al [6] 4 ~ ~ > Ardron et al [8] 02 ~ , Boivin [9] 20 ~ 0 2 ~ 50 Celata et al [0] 08 ~ ~ 2, ~,380 s (%) > > Fincke et al [] 0 ~ Jeandey et al [2] 20 ~ John et al [7] 40 ~ ~ > Marviken [3] 20 ~ 50 Super Mobydick [3] 30 ~ , 300, > 590 > 5 > > 29 > 7 > Reocreux [4] 02~ , Seynhaeve [5] 03 ~ Sozzi et al [6] Sozzi et al [6] 57 ~ ~,778 > Park [4] 05 ~ 20 0 ~ ~ 400 > Remarks Slit Down Flow Down Flow Slit Down Flow Transient Pipe Down Flow Transient, Venturi Transient,,

5 Fig Table % 83 % Table 2 Predictions of the two-phase inlet critical flow data with the Park model Experiment Pressure (MPa) Hydraulic Diameter, D (mm) Flow Length, L (mm) L/D for No of Data X (%) s (%) Remarks Super Mobydick [3] 30 ~ 00 52, 55 Sozzi et al [6] 27 ~ ~,778 > Sozzi et al [6] 63 ~ 69 54, Sozzi et al [6] 65 ~ , Sozzi et al [6] Transient, Transient, Venturi Transient, Venturi Transient, Venturi

6 50000 Calculation (kg/m 2 -s) Measurement (kg/m 2 -s) Fig Comparison between the model predictions and the test data in Table 2,,, : () 025 ~ 762 mm, L/D 8, 40 mm, (2) 200 mm L/D 5 32 [7], Table 3,, Table 4 space-dependent model Moody model [8], Henry-Fauske model [9], Homogeneous Equilibrium model (HEM) [], space-dependent model Elias-Chambre model [20], Richter model [2], general drift flux (GSL) model [] Table 3 Selected subcooled inlet critical flow data for the analytic models Experiment Hydraulic Flow Pressure No of Diameter, Length, L/D (MPa) Data D (mm) L (mm) Remarks

7 Ardron et al [8] 02 ~ , Boivin - [9] 20 ~ Boivin 2 [9] 20 ~ , Boivin 3 [9] 20 ~ Fincke et al [] 0 ~ Jeandey et al [2] 20 ~ Jeandey et al- 2 [2] 20 ~ Reocreux [4] 02 ~ , Seynhaeve [5] 03 ~ Seynhaeve 2 [5] 03 ~ Rounded Entrance + Diffuser Rounded Entrance + Diffuser Rounded Entrance + Diffuser + Diffuser Nozzle + Nozzle + + Diffuser + Diffuser + space-dependent model Tables 3 4 Table 5 Fig 2 Elias et al [] space-dependent model Richter model GSL model Richter model [2], GSL model [] Table 4 Fig 3 4 (Space-dependent model Elias et al [] ) space-dependent model GSL model [], Table 4 Selected critical flow data for model comparison Hydraulic Flow Pressure No of Experiment Diameter, Length, L/D (MPa) Data D (mm) L (mm) Sozzi et al [6] 57 ~ Remarks

8 Sozzi et al [6] 58 ~ Sozzi et al [6] 63 ~ Sozzi et al [6] 60 ~ Sozzi et al [6] 57 ~ Sozzi et al [6] 60 ~ Sozzi et al [6] 64 ~ Sozzi et al [6] 6 ~ 69 27, Sozzi et al [6] 60 ~ Sozzi et al [6] 60 ~ Sozzi et al [6] 6 ~ Sozzi et al [6] 60 ~ No 3 Nozzle,, No 3 Nozzle,, No 3 Nozzle,, No 3 Nozzle,, Table 5 Predictions of all the data in Table 3 using the Park and analytic models Model Moody Henry-Fauske HEM Park Mean s Mean s Mean s Mean s [8] Ardron et al Bovin [9] Bovin 2 [9] Bovin 3 [9] Fincke et al [] Jeandey et al [2] Jeandey et al 2 [2] Reocreux [4]

9 Seynhaeve [5] Seynhaeve 2 [5] Relative X mean and σ Moody X mean Moody σ Henry-Fauske X mean Henry-Fauske σ HEM X mean HEM σ Park X mean Park σ L over D (L/D) Fig 2 Comparison of calculated relative mean differences and standard deviations between the model and the analytic models for the data in Table 4 20 Relative X mean and σ (%) Elias-Chambre X mean Elias-Chambre σ GSL X mean GSL σ Park X mean Park σ L over D (L/D) Fig 3 Comparison of calculated relative mean differences and standard deviations

10 between the model and the space-dependent models for subcooled inlet data in Table 4 20 Relative X mean and σ (%) Elias-Chambre X mean Elias-Chambre σ Richter X mean Richter σ Park X mean Park σ L over D (L/D) Fig 4 Comparison of calculated relative mean differences and standard deviations between the model and the space-dependent models for the two-phase inlet data in Table 4 4 flashing, L/D flashing, () mm, L/D 8, 40 mm (2) 200 mm L/D 5 Acknowledgement This project has been carried out under the Nuclear Research and Development Program by MOST

11 Nomenclature (C d discharge coefficient evaluated at 20 C C dg discharge coefficient of pure vapor D diameter, mm f friction factor G mass flux, kg/m 2 s G c critical mass flux, kg/m 2 s G ref mass flux evaluated at 20 C, kg/m 2 s G TP critical mass flux of two-phase inlet conditions, kg/m 2 s G * dimensionless mass flux, G /G c ref K pipe entrance loss coefficient k ratio of specific heats L (total) length of test section, mm n number of data P pressure, MPa P b back pressure, MPa P o stagnation pressure, MPa T temperature, C T o stagnation temperature, C T ref reference temperature, 20 C T sub subcooling, C T * sub dimensionless subcooling, (T sat - T o )/(T sat -T ref ) v o specific volume of steam, m 3 /kg x o quality ρ density of water, kg/m 3 Subscript b receiver system c critical o stagnation condition ref values at 20 C sat saturation condition TP two-phase condition x = 0 saturated water x o o = all vapor Superscript * dimensionless References [] E Elias and GS Lellouche, "Two-Phase Critical Flow," Int J Multi-phase Flow, Vol 20, Suppl, pp 9-68, 994 [2] HJ Richter, Separated Two-Phase Flow Model: Application to Critical Flow, EPRI NP-800, 98 [3] The Marviken Full Scale Critical-Flow Tests, NUREG/CR-267, MXC-30, 982 [4] CK Park, An Experimental Investigation of Critical Flow Rates of Subcooled Water

12 through Short Pipes with Small Diameters, Ph D Thesis, KAIST, Korea, 997 [5] CK Park, JW Park, MK Chung, and MH Chun, An Empirical Correlation for Critical Flow Rates of Subcooled Water Through Short Pipes with Small Diameters, J Kor Nucl Soc, Vol 29, No, pp 35-44, 997 [6] CN Amos and VE Schrock, "Two-Phase Critical Flow in Slits," NUREG/CR-3475, 983 [7] H John et al, "Critical Two-Phase Flow through Rough Slits," Int J Multiphase Flow, Vol 4, No 2, pp 55-74, 988 [8] D H Ardron and MC Ackerman, "Study of the Critical Flow of Subcooled Water in a Pipe," GEGB Report: RD/B/N4299, 978 [9] JY Boivin, "Two-Phase Critical Flow on Long Nozzles," Nuclear Technology, Vol 46, Mid-Dec, 979 [0] GP Celata et al, "Two-Phase Flow Models in Unbounded Two-Phase Critical flows," Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol 97, pp 2-222, 986 [] JR Fincke and DR Collins, "The Correlation of Two Dimensional and Nonequilibrium Effects in Subcooled Choked Nozzle Flow," NUREG/CR-907, EGG-208, 98 [2] C Jeandey et al, "Auto Vaporization d'ecoulements Eau/Vapeur," CEN de Grenoble, Report TT No 63, 98 [3] Bethsy Team, "Selected Results from Characterization Tests of the Bethsy Break Nozzles (2" and 6 ) Conducted in the Super Moby-Dick Facility," Addendum to NOTE SETh/ LES/90-04, CEN Grenoble [4] M Reocreux, "A Contribution l'etude des Debits Critiques en Recoulement Diphasique Eau-Vapeur," Doctoral Dissertation a l'universite Scientifique et de Grenoble, 974 [5] JM Seynhaeve, "Etude Experimentale des Ecoulements Diphasiques Critiques a Faible Titre," Doctoral Dissertation, Universite Catholique de Louvain, France, 980 [6] GL Sozzi and WA Sutherland, "Critical Flow of Saturated and Subcooled Water at High Pressure," NEDO-348, 975 [7] V Ilic, S Banerjee, and S Behling, "A Qualified Data Base for the Critical Flow of Water," EPRI NP-4556, 986 [8] FJ Moody, Maximum Two-Phase Vessel Blowdown from Pipes, ASME J Heat Transfer, 966 [9] RE Henry and HF Fauske, The Two-Phase Critical Flow of One Component Mixtures in Nozzles, Orifices, and Short Pipes, ASME J Heat Transfer, Vol 93, 97 [20] E Elias and PL Chambrë, A Mechanistic Non-Equilibrium Model for Two-Phase Critical Flow, Int J Multiphase Flow, 0,, 984

유해중금속안정동위원소의 분석정밀 / 정확도향상연구 (I) 환경기반연구부환경측정분석센터,,,,,,,, 2012

11-1480523-001163-01 유해중금속안정동위원소의 분석정밀 / 정확도향상연구 (I) 환경기반연구부환경측정분석센터,,,,,,,, 2012 목 차 ⅰ ⅲ ⅳ Abstract ⅵ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ i 목 차 Ⅳ ii 목 차 iii 목 차 iv 목 차 v Abstract vi Abstract σ ε vii Abstract viii Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅰ. 1 Ⅰ. 서론.

歯86박춘경.PDF

歯86박춘경.PDF