<B0E6C8F1B4EBB3BBB0FA20C0D3BBF3B0ADC1C E687770>

Similar documents
ÀÇ»çȸº¸ È£-14, page Normalize ( È£-14 )

( ) Jkra076.hwp


원저 Lab Med Online Vol. 3, No. 1: 29-33, January 진단면역학 2010 ACR/EULAR 류마티스관절염의분류체계에대한항핵주변인자검사의적용에관한예비연구

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

원위부요척골관절질환에서의초음파 유도하스테로이드주사치료의효과 - 후향적 1 년경과관찰연구 - 연세대학교대학원 의학과 남상현

歯채민병.PDF

untitled

1..

전립선암발생률추정과관련요인분석 : The Korean Cancer Prevention Study-II (KCPS-II)

Pharmacotherapeutics Application of New Pathogenesis on the Drug Treatment of Diabetes Young Seol Kim, M.D. Department of Endocrinology Kyung Hee Univ

전공의 연수강좌

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

( )Kju269.hwp


기관고유연구사업결과보고

MSU crystals induce apoptosis in HEK cell

달생산이 초산모 분만시간에 미치는 영향 Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 達 은 23) 의 丹 溪 에 최초로 기 재된 처방으로, 에 복용하면 한 다하여 난산의 예방과 및, 등에 널리 활용되어 왔다. 達 은 이 毒 하고 는 甘 苦 하여 氣, 氣 寬,, 結 의 효능이 있

untitled

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구


( )Jkstro011.hwp

12이문규

00약제부봄호c03逞풚

A 617

untitled

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

서론 34 2

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

13_이찬희 외_ 수정 완료.hwp

석사논문.PDF

<30332EC6AFC1FD2DB9DABCBAC8AF2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<C7D1B1B9B1A4B0EDC8ABBAB8C7D0BAB85F31302D31C8A35F32C2F75F E687770>


( ) ) ( )3) ( ) ( ) ( ) 4) 1915 ( ) ( ) ) 3) 4) 285

연하곤란


04조남훈

김범수

Can032.hwp

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

<31332EB1E8C1F6BFB52E687770>

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

Sheu HM, et al., British J Dermatol 1997; 136: Kao JS, et al., J Invest Dermatol 2003; 120:

Treatment and Role of Hormaonal Replaement Therapy

Rheu-suppl hwp

<31372DB9DABAB4C8A32E687770>


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

<5B D B3E220C1A634B1C720C1A632C8A320B3EDB9AEC1F628C3D6C1BE292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

12¾ÈÇö°æ 1-155T304®¶ó

<323020C1F5B7CA C0E5C8F1BFF82DC0CCBCF6B0EF2E687770>

레이아웃 1

°í¼®ÁÖ Ãâ·Â

Microsoft PowerPoint - 발표자료(KSSiS 2016)

노영남

139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ


012임수진

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

서론

ÀÇÇа�ÁÂc00Ì»óÀÏ˘

Á¶´öÈñ_0304_final.hwp


( )Kjhps043.hwp

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

γ

975_983 특집-한규철, 정원호

대한한의학원전학회지24권6호-전체최종.hwp


보건사회연구-25일수정

류마티스 질환의 이해와 관리

PowerChute Personal Edition v3.1.0 에이전트 사용 설명서

( )Kju225.hwp

May 10~ Hotel Inter-Burgo Exco, Daegu Plenary lectures From metabolic syndrome to diabetes Meta-inflammation responsible for the progression fr

*Ãßõ¿©Çà

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

untitled

03±èÀçÈÖ¾ÈÁ¤ÅÂ

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

<35BFCFBCBA2E687770>

<303120C6AFC1FD20C0CCC0BABAC D E687770>

OR MS와 응용-03장

텀블러514

음주측정을 위한 긴급강제채혈의 절차와 법리, A Study on the Urgent Compulsory Blood

(

590호(01-11)

( ) 06.jkra043.hwp

7.ƯÁýb71ÎÀ¯È« š

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

퍼스널 토이의 조형적 특성에 관한 고찰

Output file

Microsoft PowerPoint - Labs and Lupus Bev2 24

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Transcription:

2012 개원의와함께하는임상강좌 경희대학교의학전문대학원류마티스내과학교실 홍승재 진단의중요성 치료의첫단계 : 정확한진단은아무리강조해도지나치지않음 감별진단의중요성 : 진단이달라짐에따라치료시기와약제의선택, 진행경과, 합병증여부, 예후및삶의질에차이가있다. 류마티스관절염 (Rheumatoid arthritis) : 비교적젊은나이에발병하며, 진단초기부터관절염증에의한골파괴소견이가능함. 진행될경우관절의심한변형과기능상실이유발 골관절염 (Osteoarthritis) : 나이가들어감에따라발생이증가하며, 염증보다연골감소로인한변화가서서히생김. 류마티스관절염진단기준의변천 1956/8 1961 1966 1987 2010 American Rheumatism association Rome criteria Now York criteria ACR* criteria 2010 ACR/EULAR** classification criteria * : ACR(American College Of Rheumatollogy) ** : EULAR(The European League Against Rheumatism)

홍승재 : 류마티스관절염의새로운진단기준 1987 년 ACR 류마티스관절염진단기준 1. 조조강직 : 1시간이상 2. 관절염 : 3관절이상적어도 6주이상지속 3. 수부관절염 4. 대칭성관절염 5. 류마티스결절 6. 류마티스인자 : 양성 7. 방사선학적변화 : 골미란또는탈칼슘화 7 개중 4 개이상이면진단됨 류마티스관절염과골관절염의관절침범분포 Ulnar deviation swan neck deformity boutonniere deformity DIP: Heberden s node PIP: Bouchard s node 류마티스관절염의주요공격타겟 관절을싸고있는활막조직 2012 개원의와함께하는임상강좌

길라잡이 : 개정된가이드라인을중심으로 류마티스관절염의진행 Inflammation Disability Joint damage (X-rays) Severity (arbitrary units) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Duration of Disease (years) DMARDs 치료시점에따른류마티스관절염진행 류마티스관절염에서 Anti-CCP antibody 의의미 Citrulline containing peptide (CCP) Highly specific for RA (specificity 90-96%) Sensitivity low (47-76%) Anti-CCP positive with early RA : increased risk of progressive joint damage test sensitivity specificity Anti-CCP 56% 90% IgM RF 73% 82% IgM RF+anti-CCP 48% 96%

홍승재 : 류마티스관절염의새로운진단기준 Anti-CCP antibody 와 IgM RF 의진단적가치 Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-ccp) Sensitivity, % (95% CI) 67 (62 72) Specificity, % (95% CI) 95 (94 97) Positive likelihood ratio (range) 12.46 (9.72 15.98) Negative likelihood ratio (range) 0.36 (0.31 0.42) Immunoglobulin M rheumatoid factor (IgM-RF) 69 (65 73) 85 (82 88) 4.86 (3.95 5.97) 0.38 (0.33 0.44) Meta-analysis of 37 studies of anti-ccp antibody and 50 studies of RF; data generated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects method Ann Intern Med 2007;146:797-808 Anti-CCP and/or RF can be detected in RA - up to 14 years before disease onset - Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:380-386 RF and anti-ccp are key predictive factors for rapid radiographic progression (RRP) in RA Risk of RRP by predictive factor, showing that RF, anti-ccp status, baseline CRP and erosion score were significant independent predictors of RRP CRP (mg/l) RF and anti-ccp status -/- +/- or -/+ +/+ Baseline erosion score 47 69 78 4 35 24 44 56 1 4 19 37 49 0 22 42 54 4 10 35 9 20 29 1 4 7 16 23 0 16 32 43 4 <10 6 14 21 1 4 6 11 17 0 Risk of RRP (%) 50 20 50 10 20 <10 Adapted from Visser et al. EULAR 2009 2012 개원의와함께하는임상강좌

길라잡이 : 개정된가이드라인을중심으로 Patients meeting ACR criteria: 1 st visit 40 RA Non-RA 30 % 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Number of ACR criteria Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:2485-91 1987 ACR 진단기준의한계점 초기 2~3 년대부분의관절손상이일어나게되지만, 1987 진단기준은 Early RA 진단 sensitivity 가낮다. 관절손상은환자의예후와직결되지만, 1987 진단기준은골미란이생긴후진단하게된다. Anti-CCP antibody 와같은새로운진단혈청검사들이개발되었으며이를진단에포함시켜야한다. Early RA 진단이어려워 DMARDs 의조기적용이안된다. DMARDs 보다강력한 TNF-a blocker 등이개발되었으며, 조기사용시관절파괴를막을수있다. 2010 ACR/EULAR 진단기준개발의목적 만성또는골미란의 risk 가있는 early inflammatory arthritis 를조기에진단하기위해. Early RA 환자에서 DMARDs 사용의근거를제공하기위해. New serologic test 를진단에적용하기위해. Scoring system 의도입으로진단의객관성을얻기위해. Later course of RA 환자의진단을배제하지않는다.

홍승재 : 류마티스관절염의새로운진단기준 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria 의개발 (Phase I) 3115 patients from 9 cohorts Enrolled in or after 2000 Duration of arthritis < 3 years Purpose : to identify the contributions of clinical and laboratory variables : predictive to initiate DMARDs in patients with early arthritis Summary of Phase I results Acute-phase response, ESR or CRP; RF, rheumatoid factor; ACPA, anti-citrullinated protein antibody Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2569-81 Conclusion of Phase I Swelling of small joint regions has independent effects Tenderness also considered as a sign of joint involvement Symmetrical involvement not have a incremental effect over unilateral involvement Abnormal APR (acute phase response) has a effect, especially CRP 2012 개원의와함께하는임상강좌

길라잡이 : 개정된가이드라인을중심으로 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria 의개발 (Phase II) 12 rheumatologists from Europe & 12 from North America 2009 ACR RA classification preliminary criteria 1 swollen joint Not currently classified as RA NO YES NO Better explained by another disease? YES Typical RA erosion on conventional radiograph? NO YE S APPLY Classification Classified as Criteria for RA RA Not currently classified as RA Summary of Phase II results Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2569-81

홍승재 : 류마티스관절염의새로운진단기준 The 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2569-81 Small joints MCP, PIP 2~5 th MTP 1 st IP wrists Large joint Shoulder Elbow Hip Knee ankle JOINT INVOLVEMENT (0-5) 1 Large joint 0 2-10 Large joints 1 1-3 small joints 2 4-10 small joints 3 10> joints (at last 1 small joint) 5 SEROLOGY (0-3) Neither RF or ACPA positive 0 At least one test low positive titer 2 At least one test high positive titer 3 DURATION of SYNOVITIS (0-1) Score 6 Indicates definite RA <6 weeks 0 6 weeks 1 ACUTE PHASE REACTANTS (0-1) Neither CRP or ESR abnormal 0 Abnormal CRP or abnormal ESR 1 2012 개원의와함께하는임상강좌

길라잡이 : 개정된가이드라인을중심으로 Tree algorithm for classifying definite RA Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2569-81 SUMMARY Eligibility for use of the new criteria : evidence of active clinical synovitis in at least 1 joint : synovitis is not explained by expert assessor Algorithm incorporates 4 weighted domains : through joint evaluation : at least 1 serologic test (RF or ACPA) : history of symptom duration : 1 acute-phase response measure (ESR or CRP) Cut-off point 6