ISSN 한국심리학회지발달 27 권 2 호 (2014 년 6 월 ) THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 목차 한국판부모양육효능감검사 (K-PSOC) 및배우자양육협력검사 (K-PAI) 의타당화연구 김정미

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "ISSN 한국심리학회지발달 27 권 2 호 (2014 년 6 월 ) THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 목차 한국판부모양육효능감검사 (K-PSOC) 및배우자양육협력검사 (K-PAI) 의타당화연구 김정미"

유현 평
4 years ago
Views:

ISSN 1229-0718 한국심리학회지발달 27 권 2 호 (2014 년 6 월 ) THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 목차 한국판부모양육효능감검사 (K-PSOC) 및배우자양육협력검사 (K-PAI) 의타당화연구 김정미 임희선 허성호 4세실행기능과 6세읽기능력간관련성 : 단기종단적탐색 김연수

1 ISSN 한국심리학회지발달 27 권 2 호 (2014 년 6 월 ) THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 목차 한국판부모양육효능감검사 (K-PSOC) 및배우자양육협력검사 (K-PAI) 의타당화연구 김정미 임희선 허성호 4세실행기능과 6세읽기능력간관련성 : 단기종단적탐색 김연수 곽금주관찰학습에서나타나는아동의모방특성 : 인과적이해를중심으로 정혜린 방희정우울한노인의담화에나타나는자전적기억의일화및비일화인출양상 김영경빈곤청소년의양육자변경빈도와내재화및외현화문제의관계에서부모및친구관계의매개효과 설경옥 백상은 이선아 박지은거짓말과참말이해에대한상황적요인의영향 : 4세아동의자료 송미리 송현주감정고려가만 4세아동의분배행동에미치는효과 유하나 이지현 송현주 김영훈중년기의성숙한노화와죽음태도및죽음대처유능감의관계 정영숙 이화진 한국발달심리학회

2 한국심리학회지 : 발달

3 원고제출및작성요령 1. 한국심리학회지 : 발달,, ( ). 2. (kjspp.editor@gmail.com).,, , 95, -10, ,800, 3,700 ( 500 ). 4..,. 5.,, ( ) (600 ),. Psychological Abstracts APA. 7.. (figure graph). 8. ( : 1. ), ( : 1. ). ( : 1..., 1...). 9.. (1970) Köhler(1940) (1970) Köhler Wallach,, (1970) Wallach (1951) (, 1970) (Köhler, 1940) (,, 1970) (Köhler & Wallach, 1944) (, 1970) (Wallach et al.,1951)... (, 1970).... (Köhler, 1940). 10., et al.... :,, (1970).., (1975).,,. Miller, G. A. (1950). Language and communication. New York: McGraw-Hill. Osgood, C. E. (1983). Psycholinguistics. In S. Koch(Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (pp ). New York: McGraw-Hill. Werner, H., & Chandler, K. A. (1950). Experiences on sensory-tonic field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, , APA Publication Manual 한국발달심리학회윤리규정 (

4 4 * 1) 2) 1) 1) 1) 2) 4, ,.,. 2,. 1,.. *, ( ) (NRF-2012-S1A3-A ). (2013). :,, ( ) hsong@yonsei.ac.kr

5 (Fehr, Bernhard, & Rockenbach, 2008; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003).,..,. (dictator game). (player).... ( ) (Castelli, Massaro, Sanfey, & Marchetti, 2010)..., 20 30% (Camerer & Fehr, 2004; Edele, Dziobek, & Keller, 2013; Gummerum, Keller, Takezawa, & Mata, 2008)., (Gummerum, Hanoch, & Keller, 2008; Harbaugh & Krause, 2000; Harbaugh, Krause, & Liday, 2003)., Fehr (2008) 3 8.,, %. 3 4,.,,

6 3 4, ( ) (,, 2013; Benenson, Pascoe, & Radmore, 2007; Harbaugh et al., 2003).?? (Fehr & Henrich, 2003).. (Gummerum, Hanoch, Keller, Parsons, & Hummel, 2010; Takagishi, Kameshima, Schug, Koizumi, & Yamagishi, 2010).,,.. (Barclay, Skarlicki, & Pugh, 2005).. Xiao Houser(2009).., ( 10% ). Ellingsen Johannesson(2008), 40% 20%, 30% 50%.,.

7 ?.. (Gummerum et al., 2010), (,, 2013;,, 2013)... Ellingsen Johannesson(2008), Xiao Houser(2009) (e.g., Benenson et al., 2007; Fehr et al., 2008;,, 2013) (,, 2003;,, 2009; Denham & Zoller, 1991; Pons, Harris, & de Rosnay, 2004; Stein & Levine, 1999)., , 4 5. Denham Zoller,,,, 4. 4,. ( 1) ( 2).,. 1,, (e.g., Ellingsen & Johannesson, 2008; Xiao & Houser, 2009).

8 ,. 2.5 (, 2007; DeLoache, 1987), 4.. (pretend play), (Denham, 1986; Dunn, Brown, Slomkowski, Tesla, & Youngblade, 1991). 3 4 (Dennis & Kelemen, 2009), (face-to-face) (e.g., Takagishi et al., 2010) ( : 52.72, : , 14, 16 ). 2,.., 15, cm, 60cm., 16cm, 10, (J, K, L)..,

(Gummerum et al., 2010). 1 1...,.,.,.. 10 1..,, 10.

9 (Gummerum et al., 2010) ,.,., ,, ,. OO OO. (J ), (K ), (L ) OO..,... OO OO.,, OO..,

10 ., (F(1, 26) = 0.209, p =.651),. t, (t(28) = 2.140, p <.05). 4.4 (SD = 2.80), 2.47 (SD = 2.10), %. (33.3%), 5 (26.7%) 3 (26.7%). 20%, 33.3%. 100% 5.

. 10 0 4, 5. Takagishi (2010) ( 5 (fair), 6 (hyper-fair) ), 5. 73.3% 26.7%,., 26.7% 73.3%,.

11 , 5. Takagishi (2010) ( 5 (fair), 6 (hyper-fair) ), % 26.7%,., 26.7% 73.3%,., (, ) (x 2 (1) = 6.533, p <.05).. 2 ( ) ( : 54.08, : , 14, 12 ). 1,.., 12, ,

12 , ,., (F(1, 22) = 0.001, p =.969). t, (t(24) = -.035, p =.973) (SD = 2.99), 4.29 (SD = 2.23), ,. 5 (25%), %.

13 5 4 ( 28.6%)., 5. ( 1, 2 ). 1 (6 ), % , 5. 50% 50%. 50% 50%, , (4.4 ) t, (t(27) = 2.261, p <.05). 4,. 1 (Ellingsen & Johannesson, 2008; Xiao & Houser, 2009) 4.,.

14 . 2 (, ), 4. 1, 2 1, ( ).,.. (,. ), (,.,. ), (, 5. ) , 14 (70%), x 2 (1) = 6.400, p < , 12 (70.6%), x 2 (1) = 5.765, p < (70.3%), x 2 (1) = , p <.001., 4 (e.g., Blake & Rand, 2010; Fehr et al., 2008; Lane & Coon, 1972) , 2. 2?,

15 .. Haley Fessler(2005), , (,,,,, 2008;,,,,,, 2013; Eisenberg & Fabes, 1990; Takagishi et al., 2010),,,, (Edele et al., 2013; Gummerum et al., 2010;,, 2013;,, 2013).,.,,.,. 1, (4.4 ) 2 ( : 4.25, : 4.29 )..,. 1?.

16 . Batson, Duncan, Ackerman, Buckley Birch(1981), Batson(2010).,. 1,,,..,., Takagishi (2010)...,... (nonmonetary sanction) (Fehr & Gächter, 2002; Xiao & Houser, 2009).,. Ellingsen Johannesson(2008),., ( ) (disapproval).,., (approval). 1,., ( ), ( )

17 ., ( ). 1..,.,., ( )..,.,.,. ( ).,,. (, )., , (2013).. (3), ,,,, (2008). :. (3), ,,,,, (2013).. (1), (2007).. (2), , (2013).,. (1), , (2003). :

18 . (2), , (2009).,,. (4), Barclay, L. J., Skarlicki, D. P., & Pugh, S. D. (2005). Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), Batson, C. D. (2010). Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature, Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), Benenson, J. F., Pascoe, J., & Radmore, N. (2007). Children's altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(3), Blake, P. R., & Rand, D. G. (2010). Currency value moderates equity preference among young children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), Camerer, C. F., & Fehr, E. (2004). Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. In J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, & H. Gintis (Eds.), Foundations of human sociality: economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies (pp.55-95). New York: Oxford University Press. Castelli, I., Massaro, D., Sanfey, A. G., & Marchetti, A. (2010). Fairness and intentionality in children s decision-making. International Review of Economics, 57(3), DeLoache, J. S. (1987). Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young children. Science, 238(4833), Denham, S. A. (1986). Social cognition, prosocial behavior, and emotion in preschoolers: Contextual validation. Child Development, 57(1), Denham, S. A., & Zoller, D. (1991). When my hamster died, I cried : Preschoolers' attributions of the causes of emotions. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 152(3), Dennis, T. A., & Kelemen, D. A. (2009). Preschool children's views on emotion regulation: Functional associations and implications for social-emotional adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(3), Dunn, J., Brown, J., Slomkowski, C., Tesla, C., & Youngblade, L. (1991). Young children's understanding of other people's feelings and beliefs: Individual differences and their antecedents. Child Development, 62(6), Edele, A., Dziobek, I., & Keller, M. (2013). Explaining altruistic sharing in the dictator game: The role of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and justice sensitivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2),

19 Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2008). Anticipated verbal feedback induces altruistic behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(2), Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454(7208), Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), Fehr, E., & Henrich, J. (2003). Is strong reciprocity a maladaptation? In P. Hammerstein(Ed.), Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation (pp.55-82). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Gummerum, M., Hanoch, Y., & Keller, M. (2008). When child development meets economic game theory: An interdisciplinary approach to investigating social development. Human Development, 51(4), Gummerum, M., Hanoch, Y., Keller, M., Parsons, K., & Hummel, A. (2010). Preschoolers allocations in the dictator game: The role of moral emotions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), Gummerum, M., Keller, M., Takezawa, M., & Mata, J. (2008). To give or not to give: Children s and adolescents sharing and moral negotiations in economic decision situations. Child Development, 79(3), Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. (2005). Nobody's watching?: Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human behavior, 26(3), Harbaugh, W. T., & Krause, K. (2000). Children's altruism in public good and dictator experiments. Economic Inquiry, 38(1), Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Liday, S. G. (2003). Bargaining by children. University of Oregon Economics Working Paper No Lane, I. M., & Coon, R. C. (1972). Reward allocation in preschool children. Child Development, 43(4), Pons, F., Harris, P. L., & de Rosnay, M. (2004). Emotion comprehension between 3 and 11 years: Developmental periods and hierarchical organization. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1(2), Stein, N., & Levine, L. J. (1999). The early emergence of emotional understanding and appraisal: Implications for theories of development. In T. Dalgleish, & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp ). New York: Wiley. Takagishi, H., Kameshima, S., Schug, J., Koizumi, M., & Yamagishi, T. (2010). Theory of mind enhances preference for fairness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(1), Xiao, E., & Houser, D. (2009). Avoiding the sharp tongue: Anticipated written messages promote fair economic exchange. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), : : :

20 The influence of others emotions on 4-year-olds' distributive behaviors Hana Yoo 1) Zi-hyun Lee 2) Hyun-joo Song 1) Young-Hoon Kim 1) 1) Department of Psychology, Yonsei University 2) Yonsei Happy Mind Psychiatric Clinic The current study investigated whether predicting others emotions affects 4-year-olds sharing behavior during dictator games. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to allocate 10 stickers between themselves and a monkey puppet shown in a photo. Children in the experimental condition, but not those in the control condition, were told that the monkey would draw a picture of how he felt about the amount of stickers he received. Children in the experimental condition allocated significantly more stickers to the recipient than did those in the control condition, suggesting that an understanding of others emotions promoted altruistic distribution. In Experiment 2, we examined whether the presence of the recipient in the setting would affect children s distribution of resources. The procedure was identical to that of Experiment 1 except that participants were asked to give stickers to a monkey puppet in a face-to-face setting. In Experiment 2, children in both conditions donated stickers about equally between themselves and the monkey puppet, which resembled results of the experimental condition from Experiment 1. These results suggest that considering others emotions as well as an awareness of another s presence promotes children s fair distribution. Key words : emotion understanding, distributive justice, dictator game, prosocial behavior

* 6 12 (agent),. 12 ( 1), 6 ( 2) ( ).,,,. ( ) ( ).,, , 1. * 2012 ( ) (NRF-2012-S1A3-A ) 2011 :,, ( ) 50 : Tel: ,

* 6 12 (agent),. 12 ( 1), 6 ( 2) ( ).,,,. ( ) ( ).,,. 6-12., 1. * 2012 ( ) (NRF-2012-S1A3-A2033375) 2011 :,, (120-749) 50 : Tel: 02-2123-2449, E-mail: hsong@yonsei.ac.kr ,.,.,. (agents). Premack Premack[1]