East Asia institute Research and Survey Series 3 EARS Series3 EAI CCFR CIDE COMEXI 한국 미국 멕시코 3개국 공동 여론조사 프로젝트 여론과 미국 외교 부시 기 외교정책의 딜레마와 선택 김성한 정한울 (공저) 여론분석센터
EARS Series3
Global Views 005 EARS Series 3
Contents 04 05 09 10 13 17 1 7 31 37 4 44
4
EARS Series 3 5
6
EARS Series 3 7
EARS Series 3
EARS Series
Global Views 005 01 10
EARS Series 3 11
Global Views 005 1
EARS Series 3 0 13
Global Views 005 14
EARS Series 3 15
Global Views 005 16
EARS Series 3 03 17
Global Views 005 18
EARS Series 3 19
Global Views 005 0
EARS Series 3 04 1
Global Views 005
EARS Series 3 3
Global Views 005 4
EARS Series 3 5
Global Views 005 6
EARS Series 3 05 7
Global Views 005 8
EARS Series 3 9
Global Views 005 30
EARS Series 3 06 31
Global Views 005 3
EARS Series 3 33
Global Views 005 34
EARS Series 3 35
Global Views 005 36
EARS Series 3 37
Global Views 005 38
EARS Series 3 Data 39
EARS Series 3
EARS Series 3
Global Views 005 4
EARS Series 3 43
Global Views 005 Question 3 (1-13) Question 3 (1-13): Below is a list of possible threats to the vital interest of the United States in the next 10 years. For each one, please select whether you see this as a critical threat, an important but not critical threat, or not an important threat at all. 3/1. Economic Competition from Europe (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 30 54 10 6 1994 7 57 10 6 44 1998 00 4 13 58 63 1 6 004 14 63 0 3 Change in % points 00-004 +1 0 - +1 3/. The Development of Chi as a world power (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 40 43 9 8 1994 57 3 5 6 1998 57 3 6 5 00 56 34 8 004 33 54 10 Change in % points 00-004 -3 +0 + 0
EARS Series 3 3/3. Islamic Fundamentalism (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 1994 33 36 14 17 1998 38 33 16 13 00 61 4 8 7 004 38 43 16 3 Change in % points 00-004 -3 +19 +8-4 3/4. The Possibility of Unfriendly Countries Becoming Nuclear Powers (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 1994 1998 7 75 1 18 3 3 4 4 45 00 85 1 1 004 64 31 3 Change in % points 00-004 -1 +19 +1 +1 3/5. Intertiol Terrorism (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 1994 69 5 3 3 1998 84 13 1 00 91 7 004 75 1 Change in % points 00-004 -16 +15-1 +
Global Views 005 3/6. Large numbers of immigrants and refugees coming into the U.S. (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 1994 7 3 3 1998 55 35 7 3 00 60 31 8 1 004 5 37 9 1 Change in % points 00-004 -8 +6 +1 0 3/7. Economic Competition from Low-wage Countries (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 46 1994 1998 40 44 1 4 00 31 44 4 1 004 35 48 14 Change in % points 00-004 +4 +4-10 +1 3/8. Global Warming (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 1994 1998 43 38 1 7 00 46 33 17 4 004 37 47 14 Change in % points 00-004 -9 +14-3 -
EARS Series 3 3/9. Chemical and Biological Weapons (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 1994 1998 76 19 3 00 86 1 004 66 9 3 Change in % points 00-004 -0 +17 +1 + 3/10. AIDS, the Ebola Virus, and other Potential Epidemics (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 1994 1998 7 4 47 00 68 9 3 004 58 37 4 1 Change in % points 00-004 -10 +8 +1 +1 3/11. Tensions between India and Pakistan (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 1994 1998 00 54 36 7 3 004 18 6 18 Change in % points 00-004 -36 +6 +11-1
Global Views 005 3/1. World population growth (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 1994 1998 00 44 4 1 004 30 55 13 Change in % points 00-004 -14 +13 +1 0 3/13. Military conflict between Israel and its Arab neighbors (N=1,195) Critical Important but not critical Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Year 1990 48 1994 1998 00 67 7 5 1 004 39 48 1 Change in % points 00-004 -8 +1 +7 +1
EARS Series 3 Question 4 Question 4 (1-14): Below is a list of possible foreign policy goals that the United States might have. For each one please select whether you think that it should be a very important foreign policy goal of the United States, a somewhat important foreign policy goal, or not an important goal at all? Raking of U.S. Foreign Policy Goals (by Very Important) (N=1,195) Very important Somewhat important Not important Not sure/ Decline Total Goal Protecting the jobs of American workers 78 19 Preventing the spread of nuclear weapons 73 3 Combating intertiol terrorism 71 5 Securing adequate supplies of energy 69 7 Stopping the flow of illegal drugs into the United States 63 7 8 Controlling and reducing illegal immigration 59 33 6 Maintaining superior military power worldwide 50 41 7 49 Improving the global environment 47 44 8 1 Combating world hunger 43 47 9 Strengthening the United Nations 38 43 17 Protecting the interests of American business abroad 3 53 13 Protecting weaker tions against foreign aggression 18 67 13 Helping to improve the standard of living of less developed tions 18 59 1 Helping to bring a democratic form of government to other tions 14 58 7
Global Views 005 Question 35 Question 35: Do you think that the United States has the responsibility to play the role of world policeman, that is, to fight violations of intertiol law and aggression wherever they occur? 35. U.S. responsibility to be World Policeman (N=1,195) Yes No Not sure/ Decline Total Year 00 34 6 4 004 0 76 4 Change in % points 00-004 -14 +14 0 Question 40 50 Question 40: Please select if you agree or disagree with the following statement: The U.S. is playing the role of world policeman more than it should be. 40. U.S. World Policeman more than it should be (N=1,195) Agree Disagree Not sure/ Decline Total Year 00 65 34 1 004 80 18 3 Change in % points 00-004 +15-16 +
EARS Series 3 Question 53b (exclusive from 53a) Question 53b: Suppose there is a government that is providing substantial support to a terrorist group that the United States thinks might pose a threat to the United States. Please select when you think the US would have the right to overthrow this government even if it does not have UN approval 53b. U.S. overthrow of governments that support terrorism without UN approval (N=583) Year 004 When the US thinks that the terrorist group may pose a threat at some point in the future, whether or not it poses such a threat now Only when the US has strong evidence that the terrorist group poses an imminent threat The US would always first need to get UN approval Not sure/ Decline Total 11 58 6 6 Question 90 Question 90: Please select whether you agree or disagree with the following statement. When dealing with intertiol problems, the U.S. should be more willing to make decisions within the United Nations even if this means that the United States will sometimes have to go along with a policy that is not its first choice. 51 90. US-UN joint decision making (N=1,195) Agree Disagree Not sure/ Decline Total Year 004 66 9 4
Global Views 005 Question 199 Question 199: In the effort to fight terrorism, do you think that in the future, compared with what it has been doing, the US government: 199. Efforts to fight terrorism (N=1,195) Year 004 Should put more emphasis on military methods Should put more emphasis on diplomatic and economic methods Has the balance about right Not sure/ Decline Total 11 58 6 6 Question 03 5 Question 03: Do you think the US should or should not make active efforts to ensure that no other country becomes a superpower? 03. US efforts to remain superpower (N=1,195) Should make active efforts Should not make active efforts Not sure/ Decline Total Year 004 5 41 6
EARS Series 3 Question 30 Question 30: Do you think the US should or should not put greater pressure on countries in the Middle East, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to become more democratic? 30. Democratization in the Middle East (N=1,195) Should Should not Not sure/ Decline Total 11/003 41 53 6 35 57 8 Data is from a PIPA/Knowledge Networks survey asked in November 003 53
54
CCFR Team The Chicago Council Foreign Relations Marshall M. Bouton, Study chair 116 South Michigan Avenues Catherine Hug 10th Floor Steven Kull Chicago, IL 60603 Benjamin I. Page Phone: (31) 76-3860 Robert Y. Shapiro Web: www.ccfr.org Jennie Taylor Christopher B. Whitney Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas, A.C., Division de Estudios Intercioles Carretera Mexico-Touca No.3655 Col. Lomas de Santa Fe, C.P. 0110 Mexico D.E. Phone: (555) 577986, 577987 Fax: (555) 577987 Web: www.cide.edu CIDE Team Susan Minushkin A Golnzalez Laura E. Cedillo Guadalupe Gonzalez Uleses Beltran Antonio Ortiz Me 55 Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Inerancioles, A.C. CamposEliseos 345, piso 6 Col. Polanco, C.P. 11560 Mexico D.F. Phone: (55) 579 6087 Fax: (555) 5796091 Web: wwwe. consejomaxicano.org COMEXI Team Andres Rozental Miguel Basanez Aurora Adame Susa Iruegas
Between Compliance and Conflict : East Asia, Latin America, and the "New" Pax America edited by Jorge I. Dominguez and Byung-Kook Kim Published in 005 by Routledge Taylor & Francis Group 56
EAI