R&D 2002. 12
.. / TEL : 3771-0473, FAX: 3771-0110, E- mail : comden@fki.or.kr / TEL : 3771-0370, FAX: 3771-0110, E- mail : jinyh@fki.or.kr
- - < > / 1 / 9. R&D / 11 1. R&D / 11 2. R& D / 12 3. / 14 4. R&D / 23. R&D / 26 1. R& D / 26 2. R& D / 29. R&D / 33 1. R& D ( ) / 33 2. R& D ( ) / 35. / 40
< >. R& D 2002 R&D 323-5.9%, 3.01% - 520, 25 21 3.10%, 2.15% 1% 2003 381 R&D - 2002 18%, 3.33% - 602, 32 2002 15.8%, 28.0% 3.48%, 2.27% 2002 R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) 7,985 9,643 10,050 10,781 11,447 R&D ( ) 225 284 305 323 381 (%) 3.05 2.92 3.02 3.01 3.33 (%) - 26.2 7.4 5.9 18.0-1 -
- 2002 R&D 420 3.35% (3.01%) 2003 R&D 591-2002 R&D 345 1.08% R&D 2003 R&D 380-2002 R&D 221 16.3%, 3.60% 2003 R&D 266-2002 R&D 267 2001 2002 20.3% 2003 10.9% 296-2002 R&D 88 22.2%, 1.96% 2003 17.0% 103 R&D - 2002 R&D 112 7.7% 2003 R&D 3.6% 116 R&D - 2 -
- 2002 R&D 81 19.1%, 0.79% 2003 94, R&D - 2002 R&D 23 R&D 2003 24, - 2002 R&D 103 4% R&D 2003 115, 2002 11.7% 2002 R&D 68%(167 ), 32%(78 ) - (100%), (94%), (90%), (35%), (40%), (49%) R&D (34%) (28%) - (12%), (8%), - 3 -
R&D (20%) (18%) - (17%) (15%) - (23%), (26%). R&D R&D 70%, 4% - (65%) (77%) - (84%), (83%), (25%), (48%), (52%) - R&D (34%) (33%) - R&D (31%), (25%), (22%), (17%) (30%), (45%) - 4 -
R&D R&D 79% -, (80%) (77%) - (96%), (95%) (100%), (94%), (92%) R&D (32%), (28%), (21%), - (40%), (32%) R&D, (46%). R&D R&D 15% - 33%, 29%, 23% - R&D -, - 5 -
R&D, - 61%, (12%), (11%), (8%) R&D, R&D 13% - 15% 12% - 28%, (25%), (20%) R&D R&D 35%, (18%), (14%), (14%), (12%) R&D (28%) (26%) - (21%), (18%), R&D R&D 50%, - 38%, R&D - 6 -
R&D, (79%),. R&D R&D (36%) - R&D (24%), (15%) -, 2%, IMF - (3%) (3%) 1, 2, - -, - 7 -
< 11> R&D ( : %) 1 R&D 36 37 34 2 R&D 24 21 29 3 15 15 14 4 R&D 12 13 10 5 5 4 6 6 3 3 4 7 3 5 1 8 2 1 2 * 1 1 1-100 100 100-8 -
< > R&D,,, < > - 9 -
< >, 250, 150 - ( 300 ) (300 ) R&D ( ) < > : : 2002. 10. 14-2002. 12. 7 (8 ) < > 400 245 ( 61%) - ( 300 ) : 146 - ( 300 ) : 99 43 4 7 15 11 10 23 5 34 18 14 18 7-10 -
. R&D 1. R& D R&D 2002 R&D 323-305 5.9% (18 ) - 1999 (255 ) 27% (68 ), R&D 3.01% - (3.02%), 1999 (3.05%) 2003 381 R&D, 2002 18% (58 ) - 3.33% 2002 (3.01%) 0.32% - 11 -
-, R&D,, < 1> R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) 7,985 9,643 10,050 10,781 11,447 R&D ( ) 225 284 305 323 381 (%) 3.05 2.92 3.02 3.01 3.33 (%) - 26.2 7.4 5.9 18.0 2. R& D 2002 R&D 520, 25-3.10%, 2.15% 1% - 6.8%, 2 13.6% - R&D, R&D - 12 -
2003 R&D 602, 32 2002-2002 15.8% (82 ), 28.0% (7 ) - 3.48%, 2.27% 2002, 2002 < 2> R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) R&D ( ) 403 452 487 520 602 (%) 3.12 2.99 3.09 3.09 3.48 (%) - 12.2 7.7 6.8 15.8 R&D ( ) 13 19 22 25 32 (%) 1.51 1.75 2.21 2.06 2.27 (%) - 46.2 15.8 13.6 28.0-13 -
3. (1 ) 2002 R&D 420 -, - R&D (3.01%) 3.35% 2003 R&D 4.32% 591-2002 R&D 40.7%, < 3> R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) R&D ( ) 340 372 409 420 591 (%) 3.74 3.44 3.43 3.35 4.32 (%) - 9.4 9.9 2.7 40.7-14 -
(2 ) 2002 R&D 345 - - R&D, (3.01%) 1.08% 2003 R&D 1.19% 380 - R&D, 10% < 4> R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) R&D ( ) 270 257 304 345 380 (%) 1.15 1.04 1.04 1.08 1.19 (%) - 4.8 18.3 13.5 10.1-15 -
(3 ) ( ) 2002 R&D 221, - R&D 90, 3.60% (3.01%), 16.3% 2003 R&D 266 - PDP, T FT - LCD, R&D < 5> R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) R&D ( ) 161 188 190 221 266 (%) 3.17 3.26 4.15 3.60 3.24 (%) - 16.8 1.1 16.3 20.4-16 -
(4 ) 2002 R&D 267, - 2000, 2001 R&D 2002 -, R&D 2002 R&D 1.95%, 20.3% 2003 R&D 10.9% 296, 2.05% - R&D,, < 6> R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) R&D ( ) 555 415 222 267 296 (%) 5.99 4.37 1.72 1.95 2.96 (%) - 25.2 46.5 20.3 10.9-17 -
(5 ) 2002 R&D 22.2%, 88 -,, R&D - R&D 2003 R&D 17.0% 103, 2.18% -, R&D < 7> R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) R&D ( ) 95 60 72 88 103 (%) 2.55 1.79 1.96 2.04 2.18 (%) - 36.8 20.0 22.2 17.0-18 -
(6 ) ( ) 2002 R&D 0.99% 112-7.7%, -, R&D 2003 R&D 3.6% 116 - R&D, - R&D < 8> R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) R&D ( ) 78 99 104 112 116 (%) 0.83 0.93 0.98 0.99 0.96 (%) - 26.9 5.1 7.7 3.6-19 -
(7 ) 2002 R&D 81, 19.1% - R&D, 0.79% - R&D 2003 R&D 94, 2002 - R&D -, R&D < 9> R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) R&D ( ) 61 67 68 81 94 (%) 0.54 0.56 0.57 0.73 0.90 (%) - 9.8 1.5 19.1 16.0-20 -
(8 ) 2002 R&D 23, -, - -, R&D 2003 R&D 24, -, < 10> R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) R&D ( ) 14 14 20 23 24 (%) 0.62 0.54 0.76 0.79 0.76 (%) - - 42.9 15.0 4.2-21 -
(9 ) 2002 R&D 2001 103 -,, R&D -, 4% - R&D, 2003 R&D 115, 2002 11.7% - R&D - R&D, R&D < 10> R&D ( ) 1999 2000 2001 2002( ) 2003( ) R&D ( ) 77 96 104 103 115 (%) 3.75 4.07 4.29 3.92 3.89 (%) - 24.7 7.7 0.1 11.7-22 -
4. R& D 2002 R&D 68% 167, 32% 78 - R&D 67% ( 33%), 69%( 31%) - (100%), (94%), (90%) 90% R&D - (35%), (40%), (47%), (49%) R&D 50% R&D (34%) (28%) - (12%), (8%), R&D -, R&D - 23 -
- R&D, -, R&D < 1> R&D R&D (20%) (18%) - (17%) (15%) R&D - (23%), (26%) - 24 -
< 2> R&D - 25 -
. R&D 1. R& D (1 ) R&D (, ), 70% - 26%, 4% < 3> R&D - 26 -
- 65%, 32%, 3% - 77%, 18%, 5% (84%), (83%) - (25%), (48%), (52%), (2 ) R&D 2002 (34%) (33%) - -, ( 55%, 40%), (35%) - 27 -
< 4> R&D, R&D ( ) (31%) - (25%), (22%), (17%), - (30%), (25%) (20%) - (45%), (25%), (20%) - 28 -
< 5> R&D 2. R& D (1 ) R&D ( ) R&D 79% - 18%, 3% - R&D, - 29 -
< 6> R&D, - 80%, 19%, 1% - 77%, 16%, 6% (96%), (95%) (100%), (94%), (92%) - (47%), (50%) R&D - 30 -
(2 ) R&D (32%), (28%), (21%), (12%) -, (40%), (24%), (19%), (32%), (24%), (23%) - ERP 50%, < 7> R&D - 31 -
, R&D - R&D - (46%), (23%), (15%) - 32 -
. R&D 1. R& D ( ) R&D 15% - 33%, 29%, 23% - R&D 77%, R&D < 7> R&D - 33 -
, - 22%, 27%, 33%, 18% - 7%, 39%, 24%, 30% -,, R&D R&D, - 61%, (12%), (11%), (8%) -, (30%), (28%), (25%) - 34 -
< 8> R&D 2. R& D ( ) R&D, R&D 13% - 15% 12% - 28%, (25%), (20%) R&D R&D 35% - 35 -
- (61%), - (18%), (14%), (14%), (12%), R&D < 9> R&D R&D - 28%, 26% - (21%) (18%) - 36 -
- R&D < 10> R&D R&D R&D - R&D 11%, 39% 50% - 8%, 30% 38% - 37 -
- R&D, < 11> R&D R&D R&D, - 79%, 21% -, - 38 -
< 12> - 39 -
. R&D R&D (36%) - R&D,, - R&D - R&D R&D (24%) - - R&D, - 40 -
-,, (15%) - R&D, -,, R&D (12%) R&D -, R&D, -,,, - - 41 -
,, R&D, 2% - IMF, R&D (3%) (3%), - 1, 2, -, - 42 -
< 11> R&D ( : %) 1 R&D 36 37 34 2 R&D 24 21 29 3 15 15 14 4 R&D 12 13 10 5 5 4 6 6 3 3 4 7 3 5 1 8 2 1 2 * 1 1 1-100 100 100-43 -
< 1> 13. R&D E-MAIL 2,.,.? ( ) (S/W,, SI ). R&D ( ),. ( ), 1999 2000 2001 2002 ( ) 2003 R&D 1. 2001 2002 R&D? (, ) ( ) - 44 -
2. 2001 2002 R&D? (, ). R&D R&D R&D, R&D. 1. R&D? ( )... 2. ( R&D )? (, ) (ERP ) 3. ( R&D )? (, ) ( ) R&D R&D R&D R&D. 1. R&D? ( )... 2. ( R&D )? (, ) (ERP ) - 45 -
3. ( R&D )? (, ) ( ) R&D. R&D? (, ) 200%, R&D. R&D 1. R&D,? ( ) R&D.,.,.. 2. R&D,? ( ) 3-7 R&D. 3. R&D %? ( % ) 4.? (, ) 5. R&D? (, ) (,, ) ( ) - 46 -
6. R&D R&D? ( ).... 7. R&D? ( )... R&D. ( ) *. - 47 -
< 2> < 146 > SDI / FAG INI STEEL KEC KT LG CNS LG PhilipsLCD LG LG LG LG LG LG LG LG- Caltex POSCO POSDATA SK T ELESYS SK SK SK SK SKC STX WIA - 48 -
< 99 > R&T NSC ENC LMS WB ( ) KISWEL( ) YG- 1-49 -