[ 미국 ] BSA, 2010 년도세계소프트웨어불법복제현황 보고서발표 1) * Business Software Alliance (BSA) 소개 (BSA), BSA, (e-commerce). BSA Adobe, Apple, ARM, Autodesk, Corel, Microsoft, Minitab, Siemens, Symantec, The MathWorks. 국내외소프트웨어불법복제현황 BSA 2011. 5. 12. 116 2010. - 2 3%,, 42% 1% 40%. - 25% 7 2 2,. ( ). * 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 1
한국, 아시아, 세계 SW 불법복제율추이 (2000 ~ 2010) - 60% 1%, 190. -, 20%. - 14% 590, BRICs (69%). - BSA Ipsos Public Affairs. - 70%, 60%. - 47%. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 2
참고자료 Ÿ Ÿ http://www.bsa.org/country/news%20and%20events/news%20archives/g lobal/05062011-idc-globalpiracystudy.aspx http://portal.bsa.org/globalpiracy2010/index.html 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 3
[ 미국 ] ISP 와검색엔진을겨냥한 PROTECT IP Act 발의 2) * 배경 2011. 5. 12. 11 The Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act ( PROTECT IP Act ),. (Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE) 2010 (The Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act, COICA ). COICA 2010. 11. 19:0 (full Senate). PROTECT IP Act 내용 ISP.. * 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 4
각계의반응 Patrick Leahy ( ) - PROTECT IP Act.. -,. - PROTECT IP Act COICA, ISP,,. - Public Knowledge Center for Democracy and Technology(CDT), COICA. - Public Knowledge Sherwin Siy PROTECT IP Act. - Electronic Privacy Information Center(EPIC) Marc Rotenberg PROTECT IP Act. - (The American Federation of Musicians), 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 5
(The Directors Guild of America), (The Screen Actors Guild), (The Software and Information Industry Association, SIIA), (The National Cable and Telecommunications Association-NCTA) PROTECT IP Act. - SIIA Keith Kupferschmid,. - NCTA Michael Powell PROTECT IP Act. 참고자료 Ÿ Ÿ http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/227760/new_copyright_bill_targets_isps_search_engines.html http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-3804 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 6
[ 미국 ] 프로그램제작자가스토리작가의아이디어를 사용한경우묵시적계약의법리와저작권법 1) * 사건의개요 1996 2003 Montz,,. 2006 11 Montz Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc., NBC Universal Inc., Craig Piligian, Jason Conrad Hawes Ghost Hunters,. 쟁점 ( ) (implied-in-fact contract) 1956 Desny 1).. (state law) (preempted). * 1) Desny v. Wilder, 46 Cal.2d 715, 299 P.2d 257 (Cal. 1956). 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 7
법원의판단 (The US District Court for the Central District of California) Florence-Marie Cooper. 9 2) 2010 6 3. 2011 5 4 9 (en banc). 3) 다툼의대상이되는법리 9. 9 2004 Grosso 4). 5) 9 2010 6 9 Grosso. 2) Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc., 606 F.3d 1153, 1158 (9th Cir. 2010). 3) Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc., 2011 WL 1663119 (9th Cir. May 4, 2011). 4) Grosso v. Miramax Film Corp., 383 F.3d 965 (9th Cir. 2004), amended 400 F.3d 658 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied 546 U.S. 824, 126 S.Ct. 361, 163 L.Ed.2d 68 (2005). 5). 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 8
[ 미국 ] 비영리교육목적으로신문사의뉴스사설을 이용한것은공정이용에해당한다는판결 * 미국네바다주연방법원은 2011. 4. 22. Righthaven이제기한저작권침해소송에서, 비영리기관이일반대중을교육하기위한목적으로신문사의뉴스사설을복사해그기관의웹사이트에게재한것은저작권자의허락을받지않았다하더라도공정이용에해당하기때문에저작권침해에해당하지않는다고판결함. Righthaven, LLC v. Jama 사건 6) 의배경 Las Vegas Review Journal( LVRJ ) 2010. 6. 28.., Center for Intercultural Organizing( CIO ) 2010. 7. 8. CIO. LVRJ 2008. 7. 26. CIO Righthaven, Righthaven 2010. 8. 5. 501 CIO. 2011. 4. 22. CIO. * University of British Columbia Law School, J.D. 6) 2011 WL 1541613 (D.Nev. April 22, 2011). 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 9
공정이용관련판결내용 1), 2),.,. ( ) - CIO, LVRJ Righthaven CIO. - LVRJ, Righthaven, CIO CIO. - CIO. -,, LVRJ., 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 10
-, CIO LVRJ,,, CIO. -,, CIO, Righthaven. - LVRJ CIO, Righthaven. CIO, Righthaven Righthaven,,. 80 Righthaven. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 11
참고자료 Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ http://www.scribd.com/doc/53658597/righthaven-v-cio-summary-judg ment-ruling http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/04/25/36074.htm http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/05/copyright-troll-clobbered -judge-finds.html 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 12
[ 캐나다 ] 대학교원협회, 대학내저작물이용에관한 종합지침서출간 * 캐나다대학교원협회가대학내에서의저작물이용에관한가이드라 인을제공하기위해캐나다의저작권및공정이용원칙을바탕으로한 종합지침서를작성하여발표함. 대학내저작물복사관련일반원칙 7),. - :. - : 50. - :, TV.. - : (Open Access), (Institutional Repositories), Creative Commons * University of British Columbia Law School, J.D. 7) Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT). 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 13
. - :,,,,,,,. - :,.,,. - :. - :. 공정이요 (fair dealing) 가이드라인. 8) 9) 8) Copyright Act, RSC 1985, c C-42. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 14
. CCH Canadian Limited v. Law Society of Upper Canada 10) ( CCH ) 6 11)., 1), 2) CCH 6, 3).. -,,. - 1, ( ),. - 10%, 10%.,. 5% 9) ( 29 ), ( 29.1 ), ( 29.2 ). 10) CCH Canadian Limited v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13. 11),,,,, 6. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 15
,. - Reserve Shelf 12),. -. 29.4 29.7. 참고자료 Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ http://www.caut.ca/uploads/copyright_guidelines.pdf http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/rsc-1985-c-c-42/latest/rsc-1985-c-c- 42.html http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5787/196/ http://www.caut.ca/home.asp?page=432 12) Reserve Shelf. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 16
[ 독일 ] 신문기사의불공정 Buy-out 약관에대한결정 * 독일뮌헨고등법원은언론인들의신문기사작성과같은저작활동에대한보수가불공정한 Buy-out 약관을통해지불되었다면, 이는저작권자의권리를침해한것으로보아신문사는기사작성자에게포괄적, 배타적, 무제한의용익권을부여하도록요구할수없고, 작성자의권리를침해하는특정약관의내용이무효라고결정함. 이결정은그동안불공정한 Buy-out 약관으로반복적으로발생한기사작성자의권리침해에대하여보수및권리를정당하게보장받을수있게만들어준데시사점이있음. 사건의내용 13) 14) ( DJV ) 3 8. Süddeutsche Zeitung 5. DJV, Buy-out. 뮌헨지방법원의결정, * 13),. 14) Der Landesverband des Deutschen Journalistenverbandes für Berlin und Brandenburg. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 17
.. 뮌헨고등법원의결정, 2,., 3,,. 10. 소송대상이된약관의구체적내용과법원의판단 ( ),,,. (Printmediarecht),,,,,, 3 - :, 3. 1,. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 18
. 참고자료 Ÿ http://www.justiz.bayern.de/gericht/olg/m/presse/archiv/2011/03022/inde x.php 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 19
[ 일본 ] 저작권등록에관한저작권법시행령개정을위해 의견제출절차를진행함 15) * 2009 (2009 53 ). 일본저작권법제78조 2 저작권등록원부는정령으로정하는바에의하여, 그전부또는일부를자기디스크 ( 이에준하는방법에의하여일정한사항을확실히기록하고있을수있는물건을포함한다. 제4항에서같다.) 로작성할수있다. (1970 335 ) (1986 287 ). 39 2011. 5. 2. ~ 16.. * 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 20
[ 중국 ] 중국자산평가협회, 저작권자산평가지침 7 월부터시행 16) * 2011. 5. 9. 2011. 7. 1.. 2008,.,,.,,,., * 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 21
,,,. 참고자료 Ÿ 我国首个 著作权资产评估指导意见 7 月起实施, 국가판권국, 2011. 5. 10. http://www.ncac.gov.cn/cms/html/205/2079/201105/716531.html 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 22
삼베문양의가전제품이삼베바탕색동벽화의저작권을 침해한것이아니라는판결 * 사실관계 2005. 9. ( ), ( ). 2008,, (, ). -,,,. 제1심판결 17) -, * 17) 2009. 10. 22. 2009 17689. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 23
,. -,,,. 항소심판결 18),,,.,,. 요약및평가, 1 18) 2011. 4. 13. 2009 111823. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 24
,. 1 (merger doctrine),.., 1,, 1. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 25