항균제 관리 필요성

Similar documents
항균제 관리 필요성

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

1.장인석-ITIL 소개.ppt

Manufacturing6

A Problem for Government STAGE 6: Policy Termination STAGE 1: Agenda Setting STAGE 5: Policy Change STAGE 2: Policy Formulation STAGE 4: Policy Evalua

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

untitled


untitled

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션


ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

歯1.PDF

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

15_3oracle

11¹Ú´ö±Ô


Rheu-suppl hwp


Output file

untitled

09김정식.PDF

<C3D6C1BE5F2D FBCF6C1A42E687770>

슬라이드 1

0125_ 워크샵 발표자료_완성.key

ZNMMZTUCJDUV.hwp

정진명 남재원 떠오르고 있다. 배달앱서비스는 소비자가 배달 앱서비스를 이용하여 배달음식점을 찾고 음식 을 주문하며, 대금을 결제까지 할 수 있는 서비 스를 말한다. 배달앱서비스는 간편한 음식 주문 과 바로결제 서비스를 바탕으로 전 연령층에서 빠르게 보급되고 있는 반면,

<BFA9BAD02DB0A1BBF3B1A4B0ED28C0CCBCF6B9FC2920B3BBC1F62E706466>

03.Agile.key


., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Microsoft PowerPoint - Freebairn, John_ppt

untitled

Main Title

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Microsoft PowerPoint - 3.공영DBM_최동욱_본부장-중소기업의_실용주의_CRM


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Week9



DW 개요.PDF


공연영상

BSC Discussion 1

4번.hwp

2

, ( ) 1) *.. I. (batch). (production planning). (downstream stage) (stockout).... (endangered). (utilization). *

975_983 특집-한규철, 정원호

ePapyrus PDF Document

Oracle Apps Day_SEM

<C7C1B7A3C2F7C0CCC1EE20B4BABAF1C1EEB4CFBDBA20B7B1C4AA20BBE7B7CA5FBCADB9CEB1B35F28C3D6C1BE292E687770>

How we create value? 안전경영 조직 및 시스템 강화 위원장 위원 간사 CEO 전략사장, CFO, 인사지원실장, 사업부장, 사업장장 안전환경인프라팀장 삼성SDI는 안전사고의 위험성에 대비하고 안전한 근무환경을 조성하기 위해 전담부서 개 편과 업무 관리범위

step 1-1

I&IRC5 TG_08권

00약제부봄호c03逞풚

<C1DF3320BCF6BEF7B0E8C8B9BCAD2E687770>


13 Who am I? R&D, Product Development Manager / Smart Worker Visualization SW SW KAIST Software Engineering Computer Engineering 3

제 출 문 국방부 장관 귀하 본 보고서를 국방부 군인연금과에서 당연구원에 의뢰한 군인연금기금 체 계적 관리방안 연구용역의 최종보고서로 제출합니다 (주)한국채권연구원 대표이사 오 규 철

Product A4

Page 2 of 6 Here are the rules for conjugating Whether (or not) and If when using a Descriptive Verb. The only difference here from Action Verbs is wh

untitled

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

<BFACB1B85F D30335FB0E6C1A6C0DAC0AFB1B8BFAA2E687770>

1 2 HDO 3 HDO 4

중국 상장회사의 경영지배구조에 관한 연구

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

°í¼®ÁÖ Ãâ·Â

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

KM-380BL,BLB(100908)

< FC3D6C1BEBCF6C1A45FB1E2B5B6B1B3B1B3C0B0B3EDC3D E687770>

대한한의학원전학회지24권6호-전체최종.hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

원고스타일 정의

歯kjmh2004v13n1.PDF

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

untitled

본문01

Vol.259 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

May 10~ Hotel Inter-Burgo Exco, Daegu Plenary lectures From metabolic syndrome to diabetes Meta-inflammation responsible for the progression fr

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

H3050(aap)

<3133B1C732C8A328BCF6C1A4292E687770>

<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

SW¹é¼Ł-³¯°³Æ÷ÇÔÇ¥Áö2013

2011´ëÇпø2µµ 24p_0628

약수터2호최종2-웹용

歯3이화진

ETL_project_best_practice1.ppt

PMP수험서_8-2쇄

274 한국문화 73

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

서론 34 2

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

<32382DC3BBB0A2C0E5BED6C0DA2E687770>

ecorp-프로젝트제안서작성실무(양식3)

목차 1. 서론 1.1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1.2. 연구의 내용 및 방법 2. 제품스타일 분석 2.1. 제품이미지 2.2. 미래지향적 스타일 3. 신세대 감성분석 3.1. 라이프스타일 3.2. 광고전략 3.3. 색채에 따른 제품구매 분석 4. 결론 *참고문헌 ( )

Transcription:

- -

(IOM, 1990) The degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge.

Classification of Quality Problems Overuse Underuse Misuse From JAMA 1998;280:1000-1005

Some Examples from Medical Literatures - Overuse & Underuse - Unnecessary surgery: 8-86%(Leape, 1992) No regular HbA 1 c & retinal exam. for many D.M. patients(weiner et al., 1995) Only14% of pt. with CV Ds. achieved recommended lipid level(mcbride et al., 1998). Failure to treat effectively AMI leads to 18,000 preventable deaths/yr(chassin & Galvin, 1998).

Some Examples from Medical Literatures - Misuse - In US 180,000 deaths/yr partly as a result of iatrogenic injuries(leape, 1994) In US 106,000 deaths/yr by fatal ADR among inpatietns(lazarou et al., 1998) Fatal medication errors in US doubled among outpatients btw. 1983 & 1993(Phillips et al, 1998). Lower quality of care within hospitals for black & the uninsured(kahn et al., 1994; Burstin et al, 1992)

QI Implicit case review Medical audit Problem-oriented studies Ongoing monitoring of departmental indicators Systems thinking Practice guidelines Outcomes management TQM/CQI Organization-wide continuous improvement in performance

Performance What How well Results Health outcomes Costs Satisfaction Judgment Quality Value

(JCAHO) What is done (efficacy) (appropriateness) How it is done (availability) (timeliness) (effectiveness) (continuity) (safety) (efficiency) (respect and caring)

(customer focus) (understanding work as processes and systems) (testing changes) (emphasizing the use of data) (teamwork)

(external customer) (internal customer)

(root cause analysis) bad apple syndrome (medication error) Inputs Processes Outputs/Outcomes

: 6. 3 vincristine 5mg IV order ( ). order...

..,. order.,. 5 20 1. ( 110 74 ).,. 5 45

: : I II

You can t manage what you can t measure. PDCA Cycle: Plan-Do-Check-Act

(Individual Problem Solving) (Rapid Team Problem Solving) (Systematic Team Problem Solving) (Process Improvement)

Q1 : Process Improvement : Q2 Q2 Individual Problem Solving : Q3 Q3 Systematic Team Problem Solving Rapid Team Problem Solving

When to use When you know the problem is dependent on only one person Teams Data Unnecessary Almost none Time Little

When to use When the team needs quick results and has a lot of intuitive ideas Teams Data Ad hoc Can succeed with little data Time Little

When to use When the problem is complex or recurring, requiring analysis Teams Data Ad hoc Need data to understand the causes of the problem Time Limited to the time necessary

When to use When a key process or system requires ongoing monitoring or continual improvement Teams Data Permanent Data from continuous monitoring; may need to collect more Time Continuous

QI FOCUS-PDCA FOCUS Find a process improvement opportunity Organize a team that knows a process Clarify the current knowledge of the process Understand causes of process variation Select the process improvement PDCA Plan - Do - Check - Act

QI FOCUS-PDCA FOCUS Find, Organize, Clarify, Understand, Select PDCA Plan the process improvement Do the improvement, data collection & analysis Check the results and lessons learned Act by adopting, adjusting, or abandoning the change

QI Assessment QI: FOCUS Improvement :, QI: PDCA

1

1

1?????

1 Brainstorming Data Collection The 7 Management Tools Affinity Diagrams Interrelationship Diagrams Tree Diagrams Matrix Diagrams Prioritization Matrices Process Decision Program Chart Activity Network Diagrams

2 (Internal customers) (External customers) / : Brainstorming

3???? /? /? :,

4 /?? : What..Who..Where..When..How? (Common cause variation) (Special cause variation)?

4 Brainstorming Cause and Effect Diagram Inverse Tree Diagram Multi-Voting Scatter Diagrams Run and Control Charts Histograms

Q1 vs. Q2:? : ( ), Q3 : ( ), Q4 Q3:? : Do Nothing, : Q4:?

5????

6,,,,?? Brainstorming Process Decision Program Charts

7

8????

8 Data Collection Scatter Diagrams Run and Control Charts Histograms Customer Surveys

9 (Hold the gain) (Adopt the change) (Adjust the change) (Abandon the change)

9,, orientation, feedback,, /, feedback,,,, /,,,

9?????

Four Steps to Quality Improvement Step 1: Identify Determine what to improves Step 2: Analyze Understand what must be known or understood about the problem in order to make improvement Step 3: Develop Hypothesize about what changes will yield improvement Step 4: Test & Implement Test the hypothesized solution to see if it yields improvement; based on the results, decide whether to abandon, modify, or implement the solution

Identify Individual decision making for a small problem that is not interdependent on others Analyze Relies on individual analysis, using existing data, observation, and intuition Develop The change is usually minor and not interdependent on others Test & Implement Trial and error approach to testing

Identify An ad hoc team identifies an intuited or obvious problem based on intuition, observation, and existing data Analyze Generally requires minimal analysis using mainly existing data and group intuition Develop A series of small changes Test & Implement Many small to medium tests in similar systems

Identify An ad hoc team addresses a complex, recurring problem Analyze The team examines the problem to try to identify its root causes; existing data and/or data collection is used Develop Generally large change that addresses the root cause of the problem Test & Implement Generally requires extensive testing before implementation.

Identify A permanent team addresses a core process or issue in a large process or system Analyze Requires detailed process knowledge from on-going data collection and monitoring Develop A change in a key process Test & Implement Depends on the approach used and magnitude of the change; permanent teams continue to monitor and improve the process

: Find, Organize Clarify : 11.8 ( 9.1 ) Understand (+) Select

: Plan Do (2nd) : 120 ml/day 3ml/Kg/day 4 Check : 9.1 6.1 : 0/19 0/18 : 11.8 10.1 Act

Make a new organizational culture Consider cost of poor quality Focus on System/Process Do the right thing right the first time Communicate success stories Use positive enforcements Encourage team approach & integration