hwp

Similar documents
1.,..,..,..,.,.,,.

의정연구_36호_0828.hwp

1-2-2하태수.hwp

석사논문연구계획서


<3031C8ABB5E6C7A52E687770>


<C5EBC0CFBFACB1B8BFF85F4B494E5520C5EBC0CFC7C3B7AFBDBA2832C8A3295FB3BBC1F628C0FCC3BC295F37C2F75F E687770>

<30315FC0CCB5BFC1D65FC7D1B1B9BCBAB8C5B8C52E687770>

<302DC5EBC0CFB0FA20C6F2C8AD28BFCF292E687770>

<3037C0CCC8AFB9FC5FC0CCBCF6C3A22E687770>

,. (, 2011). (paraphrasing)....., 까지어떻게가는지모릅니다. 라는메시지로응답자가버스정거장까지길을안내하도록하거나그의가능한반응을예상할수있다. Schulz von Thun (1984),, (Sach-Ohr), (Appell-Ohr), (Selbsto

북한의 사회통제 기구 고찰 -인민보안성을 중심으로- 연구총서 전 현 준 통 일 연 구 원

1-3-2 윤기웅, 김진영, 공동성.hwp

민주장정 100년, 광주 전남지역 사회운동 연구 총 론 나간채

요 약 대한민국은 1948년 정부수립 이후 60년 만에 세계 13위의 경제대국으로 비약적인 성 장을 이루었다. 정부수립 2년 만에 북한의 전격 남침으로 전 국토가 초토화되었고, 휴 전 이후에도 안보에 대한 위협은 계속되었다. 그러나 대한민국 국민은 불리한 여건에 좌절하

<B1E8BCF6C1A4BEC6BDC3BEC620BFA9BCBAC0C720B1B9C1A6B0E1C8A5BFA120B4EBC7D120B9CCB5F0BEEE20B4E3B7D02E687770>

<C7F6B4EBBACFC7D1BFACB1B F3136B1C72032C8A3292E687770>

BEAA hwp

*5£00̽ÅÈ�

<3133B1C732C8A328BCF6C1A4292E687770>

2 大 韓 政 治 學 會 報 ( 第 18 輯 1 號 ) 과의 소통부재 속에 여당과 국회도 무시한 일방적인 밀어붙이기식 국정운영을 보여주고 있다. 민주주의가 무엇인지 다양하게 논의될 수 있지만, 민주주의 운영에 필요한 최소한의 제도적 조건은 권력 행사에서 국가기관 사이의

5-김재철

Microsoft Word - NEW08_prof. Ma

ㅍㅍㅍㅍ통계지식과 경제적 상상의 구축

<3037C1A4BCB1BFED5FB1E8BCBABCF65FBBE72E687770>

<3033B9DABCF6B0E62E687770>

Theoretical foundation for the ethics of coaching sport Sungjoo Park* Kookmin University [Purpose] [Methods] [Results] [Conclusions] Key words:

조재욱D)-63-88

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

2. 박주민.hwp

288 經, 35 卷 4 그러나 정작 CRM은 사용되는 상황이나 CRM을 보는 관점에 따라 그 의미가 분분 한 것이 실상이다. 예를 들면, 영업을 담당하는 사람들은 CRM을 하나의 영업전략으 로 정의하고 있는 반면, 캠페인 관리를 하는 사람은 CRM을 좀더 개인화되고

<B9DABCBCC1A45FBCB1B9CCBCF6C1A42E687770>

CNVZNGWAIYSE.hwp

¨ë Áö¸®ÇÐȸÁö-¼Û°æ¾ðOK

<C0CEB9AEBBE7C8B C1FD32C8A3292DC3D6C1BE2E687770>

(5차 편집).hwp

< BBF3B9DDB1E228C6EDC1FD292E687770>

歯 c PDF

大 韓 政 治 學 會 報 ( 第 23輯 1 號 ) 된지 오래다. 국회가 본연의 임무를 다 하지 못하기 때문이다. 물론 의회가 국민들로부터 불신 받는 것은 우리나라만의 문제는 아니다. 문제는 국민들이 국회에 대한 불신이 너무 크며 업무 수행 능력에 대해서도 아주 부정적으

2016-국가봄-6-정은숙( ).hwp

£05ä·Ðȸ

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

제 출 문 문화체육관광부장관 귀하 본 보고서를 문화예술분야 통계 생산 및 관리 방안 연구결과 최종 보고서로 제출합니다. 2010년 10월 숙명여자대학교 산학협력단 본 보고서는 문화체육관광부의 공식적인 견해와 다를 수 있습니다


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

untitled

<312DBACFC7D1BBE7C0CCB9F6C0FCB7C22DC0D3C1BEC0CEBFDC2E687770>

1?4?옥?-32

<C0FCC8C4BCD2BCB3B0FAC7E3B9ABC1D6C0C7C0FBB9CCC0C7BDC42DBABBB9AE2E687770>


시안

74 현대정치연구 2015년 봄호(제8권 제1호) Ⅰ. 서론 2015년 1월 7일, 프랑스 파리에서 총격 사건이 발생했다. 두 명의 남성이 풍자 잡지 주간 샤를리 의 본사에 침입하여 총기를 난사한 것이다. 이 사건으로 인해 열두 명의 사람이 목숨을 잃었다. 얼마 후에

<BCBCB0E8C1A4C4A120C6C4C0CFB8F0C0BD2833C2F7292E687770>

26-ÀÌÇýÂùÅä·Ðȸ

h99-37.PDF

대구전시컨벤션센터 전시행사의 지역경제 파급효과 분석

08_¹Úö¼øöKš

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

06_ÀÌÀçÈÆ¿Ü0926

567돌 한글날 기념 누구나 알아야 할 한글 이야기 10+9

표현의 자유

<313329C3D6C1A4C7A52E687770>

중국 상장회사의 경영지배구조에 관한 연구

Microsoft Word - 21KR_Proceeding_2009_

4.기획특집5-최종

에너지 포커스 (제2권 제2호 통권12호, ·4)

04±èºÎ¼º

43¹ÚÁ¤µ¿-Çؿܼ¼¹Ì³ª

한국교양교육학회/전국대학교양교육협의회/한국교양기초교육원 주최 2015 추계전국학술대회 프로그램 주제 교양교육의 : 당면과제와 전망 일시 : 2015년 11월 20일(금) 14:00~19:00, 21일(토) 09:00~17:00 장소 : 경남대학교 1공학관(공과대학 6층

<B1B9B9CEC5EBC7D5C0BB20C0A7C7D120C0CCB3E4B0A5B5EE20C1F8B4DCB0FA20B1B9C8B8C0C720BFAAC7D220B8F0BBF62E687770>

세종대 요람

진보적 효과 라고 불렀다. 3) 그렇다면, 오늘날 우리 사회에서 조-중-동 이라는 용어는 무엇을 의미하고 상징 하는가? 많은 이들이 이 세 신문을 보수신문 으로 분류하고 있으며, 이른바 한-경 과 대척점에 있는 것으로 여기고 있다. 조-중-동 이라는 호명이 무엇을 근거

<B1B3C8B8BBE7C8B8BBE7BEF75F3236C8A35FBABBB9AE5F33C2F72E687770>

12월16일자.hwp

SNS 명예훼손의 형사책임

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

±¹Á¦ÆòÈ�3±Ç-01~06,01~186š

지방자치시대의 정책갈등 분석

2 KHU 글로벌 기업법무 리뷰 제2권 제1호 또 내용적으로 중대한 위기를 맞이하게 되었고, 개인은 흡사 어항 속의 금붕어 와 같은 신세로 전락할 운명에 처해있다. 현대정보화 사회에서 개인의 사적 영역이 얼마나 침해되고 있는지 는 양 비디오 사건 과 같은 연예인들의 사

< DB9DFC1A6B9AE28BCF6C1A4BABB292D312E687770>

목차 1. 서론 1.1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1.2. 연구의 내용 및 방법 2. 제품스타일 분석 2.1. 제품이미지 2.2. 미래지향적 스타일 3. 신세대 감성분석 3.1. 라이프스타일 3.2. 광고전략 3.3. 색채에 따른 제품구매 분석 4. 결론 *참고문헌 ( )

학습영역의 Taxonomy에 기초한 CD-ROM Title의 효과분석

<BEE7BFB5B1D52E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

13Ç㿱-Ãʱ³

ePapyrus PDF Document

<30315FB1E2C8B9B3EDB4DC B0A1C0BBC8A3295FB1E8C1DFC8A32E687770>

<30312DC8ABBDC2C7E52E687770>

*ÅëÀϹ®Á¦ÀÌÇØÓMì272»¹®

, (, 2000) (public management),,, ( ), (Parasuraman, 1988), Lacobucci(1996) (consumer evaluation),,, ( ) ( E x p e c t a t i o n ) (, 2001) Parasurama

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

15_3oracle

6.장우영논문

<BED6C7C3BCD2BDBA5F4B5350BBFDBBEABCBA31C0E5312D32302E70312E504446>

歯J01-13.PDF

Transcription:

접속시대의사회갈등과사회통합 2005. 2

. 2005. 2 : :

1 7 1 11 2 13 1 13 2 14 3 19 1 19 2, 20 3 26 4 29 4 32 1 32 2 36 3 39 5 41 1 41 2 43 3 46 4 49 5 51

2 6 52 7 54 6 56 1 57 1. 58 2. 59 3. 61 2 63 1. 63 2. 64 3.? 66 4. 68 5. 69 7 : 71 1 71 2 71 3 75 1. 76 2. 78 3. 78 4 80 5 81 6 83 8 : 86 1 87

3 2 89 1. 90 2. 94 3. 98 9 104 109

4 4 1 40 7 1 73 7 2 75 7 3 76 7 4 77 7 5 78 7 6 79 7 7 80 7 8 81 7 9 82 7 10 ( ) 83 7 11 ( ) 83 7 12 85

5 3 1 27 3 2 29 5 1 46

7 1.,,.,,. 2.,,.,,,... 1960,,,,,

8,..,,,,,,... 2000 (Nimby).,.,,,.., KBS MBC SBS,, 10 2004 8 12.,.,

9..,.,..,.,.,,.,..

10 3.,..,.......,.,, 10.

1 11 1.,,,.,,..,. 2002,,,.,,..,.,.

12.,,.,,.??,???,.,,.

2 13 2 (, 2000).,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,,.,,,,. 1,,,,,,,,,, (Fink, 1968)... (, 1997;, 2000). (H. J. Reitz),

14 (J. Litterer),,, (J. A. Stoner),,,, (disagreement). (R. H. Kiman and K. W. Thomas, 1983),. (J. G. March and H. A. Simon, 1958)., (R. Darendorf, 1959: 135), (L. A. Coser),,, (Coser, 1956[1980]: 12). 2,.,. (T. Parsons),,,,

2 15.., (E. Durkheim), (K. Marx), (G. Simmel).,.,.,.,...... (, 1992: 64-66)....

16,.,,.,.,.,.,.., (Dahrendorf. 1959)......,.,,

2 17,..,,,..,,. (Coser, 1956[1980]).,,..,,,., (, 1997: 51).,,,.,,,.,,,,

18.,,,,.,.,..

3 19 3,,,,,.,,,,,,,,..,,.,,,. 1.,,,,.,..

20,,,,, (subculture).,,,, (, 1994: 16-17).,, (Dahrendorf, 1967; Giddens, 1975)... (post-bourgeois), (silent revolution) (Inglehart, 1977).. ( ), ( ), ( ), ( ) (, ). 2,..,

3 21.,,, (Stroh and Miller, 1993: 28-39).,., (, 1997).,. (C. Offe).,.,.,,.,..,,,.

22 (Offe, 1972: 27). (J. Habermas). 1),.,,,.,.., 1) Habermas(1973) 9.., (1973. 11).....,..,.,,. (Habermas, 1973: 12).

3 23.,.,., (Gesamtkapitalist).,.....,.., (Habermas, 1973: 88-89)..,.

24.... (Habermas, 1973: 98).,... ( )... (Habermas, 1973: 100).,.,., (Habermas, 1973: 99)..,,..,.,.

3 25.,.,,, (Habermas, 1993: 104).,,.,,..,....,,..,

26 (N. Luhmann). 1960 70 80,,,, (Luhmann, 1984).,,,.,,,.,.,,,, (Luhmann, 1986: 144-145).,,,.,,,,,,,, (Luhmann, 1987). 3,

3 27.,., ( 3 1 ). 3 1,, (conventional)..

28..,,,...,.,,..,,,, ( 3 2 ).,,.

3 29,. 3 2 NEW,, NEW OLD,, OLD 4.,.,,,,,,,

30.,,,,,,,,.,. ( ) ( ) (, 1997: 56).,,,.,,,,.,.,,,,,.,,.,,.,,,.,.,,.,

3 31..,,,.,,,.,,, (FTA),.,.,., (system) (life world).,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.

32 4., 6.25. 4.19, 5.16,,,,, 10.26 1987 (, 2000)..?,,,. 1, 1960 3.,, (, 1985).,

4 33,, (, 1987).,,,,,,,.,,,,,.,., 1960 72 28, 4 1985 35 65. 1960 28% 1990 74% (, 1991: 45). 1966 1970 20%, 1980 21% 24% (, 1994: 19-20). 1990 1997 8. 6, 2 80., 5. 1990 40 (, 2000)..

34.,.. 5,,.. 40. 1955 1994,, 1,,,, (, 2000)..,., 1955 1993 3.7%.,,, 21%, 20%, 35%, 20%. 36%.

4 35.,,,,.. 1960 1980 2.7, 1.6, 2.5. 2, 3 (, 1982;, 1985:, 2000)., 1950, 1960, 1980.. 4,....,. 1960,,.

36 1966 8.2% 1985 20.7%. 1987..,., 1960 70.. 1980 1980.. 1980 1960 1970,,. 1980 3%, 25%, 70%, 2%.,,. 2,.,,,,

4 37...,,..,,... 2000 (Nimby).,,.,,,. 2) 2), 2004 9 17 55.,

38,,,,.,.,,,..,,. 1987,... 3,000, 1,500.,.. 18 2 2,000,. 500 (, 2004 9 18 ).

4 39.,. 1960,,. 1987., (, 2001: 21). 3. 71.2%, 27.6%, 1.1%. 52.5%, 36.4%, 88.9% (, 2004)., ( 76.6%), (75.7%), (74.8%). (71.2%).. 50 80.1%. 40 73.3%, 30 68.0%, 20 62.0%

40.,. 4 3, 65.9%. 150 73.9% 69.5% 251. 322 78.1%, 72.2%, 70.1%, 69.1%. 60.7% 61.5%.,.,, 1/3 ( 4 1 ). 4 1 ( : %) KRC(2003. 8. 11) 37.9 14.8 9.8 8.7 24.7 KRC(2004. 9. 11) 36.6 27.4 10.4 8.9 12.2 TNS(2004. 10. 27) 52.8 29.6 7.1 4.4 3.3 2.0

5 41 5,.,,,,,,. 1,.,,,,,,,.,.,,.,.

42 1997 IMF. IMF IMF,,,, (, 1999). IMF. IMF. 1998, 20% 1997 37.2% 39.8%, 80%. IMF. IMF,.,. 80 20.,..,,.

5 43...,.. 2.,. (, 1998).,,.,. (, 2003)..

44,., ( ).... ( ),...,..,

5 45. 4, 4..,.,,.. ( ) ( )..,.,,,. 21 2004 6 ( 5 1 ). 2002 6 31.3% 2004 2 27.9% 3.4%, 2 17.4% 22.0% 4.6%. 2002

46,. 5 1 : 21, 2004 3.. 1960,, (, 1991)., 3, 3,,,

5 47,,,,,,.. 1987,,,. 1987,,.,,,,.,...,,,, (, 2001: 38). 1997 IMF. 3) 3) 1990 2% IMF 7%

48.,, (, 1999).. 2004 11 2.. IMF,,,., IMF 60% 1998,.. (, 2000: 262)., 1999 1/4 8.4% 175.. (2002 8 ), (1360 ) 56.6%(770 8 ). 96 (182 ) 52.9%, 45.5 ( 44 ) 1.5.

5 49.,.. 4 1..,.,. (individuation).. 2002., 2000 1,431 2, 1 15.5%. 21%, 18.5%..,, ( ),,

50,. IMF,., 1997 11 4 72 1998 4 3 3 95, 1998 2 1.,,.,,,.. (,, ). 70%.,..., 1998 7.7% 10.8% (, 2001). IMF 63%, 24%,.,,, ( ),.

5 51 5.,,. 2002,,.,.,,,,,...,,.,,,, (, 1993)...,. 2003 7 (KSDC), 39.8%, 36.1%, 17.7%. 20 31.8%, 9.0%, 27.4% 10%, 50 41.5%, 30.5%,

52 15.4% 20 12% (, 2004: 43).. 2001 7.4%, 354 3. 7%, 14%, (, 2004). 7% 14% 115, 71 15. N,..,.,,. 6.,

5 53., (, 1993).. 1971 1 3 1987, 1992, 2000. 2002.,.,.,., 1960... 1960,. 1997..

54, (NIMBY) (PIMPY),... 7.. 2002,,,..,,.,,. (relative deprivation).

5 55.,... IMF, ( ).,,..,. (we-group) (other-group),.,.

56 6,.. 1994 1997 100, 1999 1,000 2001 2,000, 2004 3,000.., 11.5, 74.5% 3. TV (, 2004).,, (primitive fusion) (differentiation).., (electronic commerce). DB..

6 57,,,..,,,,.,. 1..,.,. (official sphere), (quasi-official sphere), 3 (third place), (incidental sphere), (private sphere).,

58,. 3,, BBS, (, 2000: 26-28). 1.., (, 2002a: 111).,,,.,.,,,,,.

6 59 2.. 2000.,,...,.,,.,,,.,.,. 1999 10 3 1 ifree.com. 2000 6 7

60. 4),,,,. 2001 2002.,,,,,. 2001,,,,,, 2002., 2002 (www. antimigun.org). (www.yesanti.com), 100 (www.anti-100.com), 21 (www.anti21c.com), (http://www.antinetwork.net). 2003. 4) (, 2000 6 28 ).

6 61,.,.,....,, (, 2003). 3..,, (solidarity).. (CMCs),

62,,,,,..,.,,.....,,,,.,,.,.,.,.

6 63 2.,,,. 1..,,.. (Itsuko Yamaguchi),, (essential tension) (Yamaguchi, 1998. 9: 1 2).,....,,,,

64. (liberal spirit).,.,.. (, 1998).. ( 53 ) ( ), (, 2001)., (, 2002: 16).,,,. 2..,

6 65,, (dataveillance)..... 40%.,..., 770815 A, a 770815. a. b c A b c 770815. b c,.. 2004, 160 68%. 221 47%. 1,297 2.5,

66 4,552 34% (, 2004 7 26 ).. (, 2001)... NEIS(National Education Information System). 5) 3.?.. P2P(Peer to Peer) (, 2002: 18).. 10 5) NEIS 1, 16,.

6 67.,,,. (copyright) (copyleft).,. 6)., 2003 P2P MP3 50. 2003 9 P2P 2 61. 2003., 6) 1980 GNU(GNU is Not Unix ). 1991 (OS).,...

68. ( ) ( )... 4..,,, (2004)., 50,,, 100 ( ) 15, ( ) 100, 35%. 26.2%, 60.8%, 73.3%. (,,, ). 60%,

6 69. 10%, 20%., 90% 50% 70%...,,..,.,,,.,... 5.. (2004), 6 39 90%, 40

70 (40 58.3%, 50 27.6%)., 1.. 40 7.5% 30 7.9%, 50 4.4%.,.,...

7 : 71 7 :..,,,, KBS, MBC..,. 2000 2..,,,,,..

72 1.,,...????? 2, KBS MBC SBS,, 10 2004 8 12., 7 1.

7 : 73 7 1 125 03. 5. 15 04. 7. 31 HOT! 234 03. 7. 22 04. 9. 4 4 04. 8. 9, 20 2002. 8 26 2003 461 03. 8. 12 04. 10. 3 KBS & 24 04. 5. 1 9. 30 MBC 90 01. 3. 16 04. 9. 20 SBS,., (100 ).... HOT!, 3.....

74,., 17,., 20...... KBS &,,.. best,. MBC,.,.

7 : 75 3,.. 7 2 KBS MBC 82 194 2 164 14 51 9 15 531 31 28 1 129 4 18 4 8 223 7 10 0 44 2 12 1 1 77 3 0 0 13 0 4 1 0 21 1 0 0 5 1 0 1 0 8 0 2 0 9 1 1 0 0 13 0 0 1 20 2 4 2 0 29 1 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 10 125 234 4 390 24 90 20 24 911 7 2,,,...,.,,

76., 7 3. 7 3 / (A) / (B) A B 223.92 188.21 42/123 44/123 21 20 94.87 419.09 31/108 35/108 7 5 154.25 39.66 2/4 2/4 1 1 1326.78 81.49 58/379 93/379 19 13 KBS 96.63 226.78 6/24 11/24 1 1 MBC 280.33 111.97 21/90 28/90 4 1 184.36 9/19 9 5 * A: / ** B: / *** A B: A B 1.. 2 3,,,,,.. ( 7 4 ).

7 : 77 7 4 ( ) : / : / : / : / : /K: KBS/M: MBC ( ) ( ) 0 1/7 1/7 ( ) 0 2/7 2/7 ( ) 0 2/7 1/7 ( ) 14 1/7 ( ) 14 1/7 ( ) ( ) 14 1/7 ( ) ( )( ) 14 1/7 5/7 ( ) 14 3/7 ( ) ( ) 14 1/7 ( ) 0 2/7 2/7 ( ) 0 2/7 2/7 = ( ) 2 2/7 ( ) 2 1/7 6/7 ( ) 2 3/7 ( ) 3 2/7 ( ) 1 4/7 (M) 0 4/7 5/7 ( ) 2 6/7 (K) 0 6/7 ( ) 0 6/7 6/7, ( ) 8 3/7 ( ) 8 2/7 6/7 ( ) 8 1/7 ( ) 0 1/7 1/7 ( ) ( ) 11 4/7 4/7 ( ) 5 6/7 ( ) 5 6/7 6/7 ( ) 10 6/7 * : ** ( ): / *** ( ): /

78 2.,,,.. ( ) ( 7 5 ). 7 5 ( ) : / : / : : / : /K: KBS/M: MBC ( ) ( ) 0 1/7 1/7 KBS ( ) 0 2/7 2/7 ( ) 3 2/7 6/7 ( ) 9 1/7 ( ) 2 4/7 4/7 / ( ) 0 3/7 3/7 ( ) 4 3/7 3/7 ( ) 3 2/7 4/7 ( ) 1 2/7 ( )( ) 2 1/7 2/7 3...,

7 : 79.. ( 7 6 ). 7 6 ( ) : / : / : : / : /K: KBS/M: MBC ( ) ( ) 1 1/7 1/7 ( ) 0 2/7 2/7 ( ) 0 5/7 ( ) 7 5/7 5/7 ( ) 0 5/7 ( ) 0 1/7 1/7,,..,,,..

80 4. 7 7,..,. 7 7 15,801 12,334 3,344 3,022 2,955 2,339 1,937 1,861 1,760, 1,671 1,624 ( ) 1,519 1,468 1,462,.

7 : 81,,., ( 7 8 ). 7 8 719.34 699.9 588.76 588.75 ( ) 550.18 448.06 442.67 ( ) 441.44 413.09 MBC 374.96 5,. 14.,,,

82 ( 7 9 ). 7 9 ( ) ( ) 14 ( ) ( ) 14 ( ) 14 14 ( / ) 14 11 10 9, 8 14.,, ( 7 10 ).. 7 11,,,,.

7 : 83 7 10 ( ) ( ) 6( / / /K/M/ ) 6( / / /K/M/ ) 6( / / /K/M/ ) / ( ) 6( / / /K/M/ ) KBS / 6( / / /K/M/ ) / 6( / / /K/M/ ) 6( / / /K/M/ ), ( ) 6( / / /K/M/ ) 6( / / /K/M/ ) 7 11 ( ) ( ) 6( / / /K/M/ ) 6( / / /K/M/ ) 6( / / /K/M/ ) / ( ) 6( / / /K/M/ ) KBS / 6( / / /K/M/ ) / 6( / / /K/M/ ) 5( / /K/M/ ) 5( / / /M/K) 5( / / /M/K) 5( / / /M/K) 6.

84,.. (browsing),,,,,,,..,,,,.,. (group polarization)., (decontextualization) (clue) (Siegel et al. 1986). ( 7 12 ).,.

7 : 85.,.,. 7 12 (%) 0 23 4 1 1 4 11 0 52.3 9.1 2.3 2.3 9.1 25.0 7),..,,. 7),.,.,.

86 8 :,...,., (, 1992: 263-168).,.,.,..,.,..,..

8 : 87.,.,...,,..,.,...,.. 1

88.,, (, 1995: 300).,.,,,.,.,,,,..,.,....,

8 : 89,.,....,. 2, (Rustow, 1970: 362).,.,.

90 1., (age of paradox) (Handy, 1994)....,., (paradoxos), (contrary to expectation).,..,,, (mutual exclusivity),, (simultaneity) (Pascale, 1990). (dilemma).. ( ), ( ). (Camaron and Quinn, 1988: 2),

8 : 91,.,.,...,,,,,,,,.,,,., (, 1994: 56).,.,,., (, 1994: 62)..,.,

92.?,,,. (, 2001).,,..,.,,.., (systems thinking).,.,.,...

8 : 93,.,..,.,. (interpenetration).,., (social integration), (system integration), (Münch, 1982: 395).,..,..,.,

94.. 2. (Joseph A. Schumpeter). (majority rule),. (majoritarian democracy) (representative democracy) (, 2004: 24-25). ( ) (policy-making).,,, (cleavage society).,, (subsocieties)., (, 2004: 27-28).

8 : 95., (, 2004: 106).,. (Berman and Weitzer, 1997).,..,.,,, (decontextualization).,,,,.,., (speaker) (listener).,, (interactive forms of communication).,, (gatekeeper),

96, (, 2002: 14;, 1998).,,.,., (Herring, 1993).,,,.., (Resnick, 1998: 50).. (, 2004: 82-83)...,,

8 : 97.,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,..,..,. (, 2001: 199). (diversity into integration) (, 2004).

98 3.,,,,,. 1990 WTO 1997 IMF. 2002. 10 60., TV... TV.,,,,, (, 2002)., (, 2002;, 2002;, 2002).,,,, (, 2002b;

8 : 99, 2002c).?.,,.. R.,, ( ),,,,,, (, 2002).,. (, 2003: 22)., 21., (, 2002).

100,..,. 20,. (, 2002)..,.,,..,..

8 : 101.,, (cosmopolitan)..,, (, 2003: 27).,,,,,,..,,,.,,.,,. (self-organizing)

102 (decentralization).. (New Science) (emergence).,. (spontaneous) (order) (chaos) (Maturana and Varela, 1980; Prigogine and Stenger, 1984; Waldrop, 1992).,.,... (best practice)

8 : 103. 3.

104 9,,.,,..,,. 200., (reinforcement). 50,,,..,,,.,,

9 105... 50,,,,.,..,,.,,., (discipline).,.,.,,,,

106.,,, (cleavage society),..,. 1987.,,,..,,.....

9 107,..,.,.,..,..,.,, 10,,..,.,

108,,,,.

109, :,,,, 2002.,,, 1991.,,, 1982.,,,,, 1993.,,, 2004,,,,, 1991.,,,,, 1987., :,, 35 3, 2001.,, 13, 2002a., R,, 31,, 2002b.,, 9 3, 2002c.,, 37 6, 2003.

110,,, 2002,, 2003.,,, 2002., (Peak Society),, 2002,, 2003., 13,, 2004., 1999,,,,, 1999.,,, 1992.,,,, 2004.,,, 1995.,, 2001., 2002, Issue Paper, 2002. 8. 3,, 2002.,,, 1998.,,, 2004.,,,.,, 1994.,,,, 1985,,, 1994., e,, 2000.,,, 2001.

111,,, 2000.,,, 1997.,, 2000.,,, 2000.,, KBS (2000 9 1 ), 2000.,,, 1998.,,,,, 2002.,,,,, 1991.,,, 2003.,, /,,, 1993., NGO,, NGO :,, 2001.,,, 1997.,,, 2002.,,,,,, 1999.,,, 1998., :,, 2003, 2003., :,, 2002,, 2003.

112,,, 2002 21,, 2004 3 10 500, 2004..,,, 2002.,, http://www.nic.or.kr/, 2003., 2004, 2004.,,, 1985., 2001, 2001.,,,, 2002.,,,, 2002. 47,,, 2000, :,, 1998.,,, 30 4, 1999. Angell, R. C., The Sociology of Human Conflict, E.McNeil (ed.), The Nature of Human Conflict, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1965. Berman, J. and Weitzner, D.J., Technology and Democracy, Social Research 64: 3, 1997. Bürklin, W.P., Die Grünen und die Neue Politik, PVS 22, 1981. Coser, Lewis A., The Functions of Social Conflict, New York: Free Press, 1956,,,, 1980. Dahrendorf, R., Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1959. Dahrendorf, R., Recent Changes in the Class Structure of European Societies, Grandbard, S. (ed.), A New Europe, Boston, 1967.

113 Fink, C. F., Some Conceptual Difficulties in the Theory of Social Conflict, Journal of Conflict Resolution 12, Dec. 1968, pp.429 431. Giddens, A., The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies, New York/London, 1975. Gorz, A. Der Abschied vom Proletariat, F.a.M., 1980. Habermas, J., Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus, Frankfurt a.m., 1973., Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Bd.1 and 2, F.a.M., 1981. Handy, C., The Age of Paradox, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994. Herring, S., Gender and Democracy in Computer-Mediated Communication, Electronic Journal of Communication 3: 2, 1993. Inglehart, R., The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics, Princeton, N.J., 1977. Kilmann, R.H. and K.W. Thomas, Four Perspectives on Conflict Management; An Attributional Framework for Organizing Descriptive and Normative Theory, Academy of Management Review, Jan. 1983, pp.59 60. Klingemann, H.D. and Pappi, F.U., Politischer Radikalismus, München-Wien, 1972. Litterer, J.A., Conflict in Organization: A Reexamination, H. Tosi and W. Hamner (eds.), Organization Behavior and Management, Michigan State University, 1974. Luhmann, N., Soziologische Aufklärung 1, Opladen, 1970., Soziale Systeme, F.a.M., 1984., Ökologische Kommunikation, Opladen, 1986., Tautologie und Paradoxie in den Selbstbeschreigung der modernen Gesellschaft, Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie, Jg.16, 1987, pp.161 174. March, J.G and H.A. Simon, Organizations, N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons, 1958. Maturana, H. and F. Varela, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing, 1980. Münch, M., Theorie des Handelns. Zur Rekonstruktion der Beiträge von Talcott Parsons,

114 Emile Durkheim und Max Weber, Frankfurt a.m., 1982. Pascale, R.T., Managing on the Edge: How the Smartest Companies Use Conflict to Stay Ahead, New York: Touchstone, 1990. Prigogine, I. and I. Stenger, Order out of Chaos: Man s New Dialogue with Nature, New York: Bantam Books, 1984. Quin, R.F. and Cameron, K.S.(eds.), Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management, Cambridge: Ballinger, 1988. Resnick, D., Politics on the Internet: The Normalization of Cyberspace, Chris Toulouse and Timothy W. Luke (eds.), The Politics of Cyberspace, London: Routledge, 1998. Siegel, J., et al., Group Processes in Computer-mediated Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 27, 1986. Stoner, J.A.F., Management, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1978. Stroh, P. and Miller, W. W., Learning to Thrive on Paradox, Training and Development, 1993. Tenbruck, F.H., Die Glaubensgeschichte der Moderne, ZfP 1, 1976. Yamaguchi, I., Coexistence of Cyberspace and the Real World under Tension: Some Reflections on the Premises of Cyberspace Law, Asia-Pacific Regional Expert Meeting on Legal Framework of Cyberspace, September, 1998. Waldrop, M.M., Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, London: Viking, 1992.

2005 2 2005 2 1-1 TEL: 570-4114 FAX: 579-4695 6