Similar documents
#Ȳ¿ë¼®

11¹Ú´ö±Ô

untitled

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

강의지침서 작성 양식

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

12È«±â¼±¿Ü339~370

< FBEC6C1D6B9FDC7D05F39C2F72E687770>

<BFA9BAD02DB0A1BBF3B1A4B0ED28C0CCBCF6B9FC2920B3BBC1F62E706466>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

09김정식.PDF

,.,..,....,, Abstract The importance of integrated design which tries to i

Vol.259 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

10송동수.hwp

Vol.257 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con


PowerChute Personal Edition v3.1.0 에이전트 사용 설명서

06_ÀÌÀçÈÆ¿Ü0926

歯1.PDF

- 2 -

<30362E20C6EDC1FD2DB0EDBFB5B4EBB4D420BCF6C1A42E687770>

untitled

03-ÀÌÁ¦Çö

<BCF6BDC D31385FB0EDBCD3B5B5B7CEC8DEB0D4C5B8BFEEB5B5C0D4B1B8BBF3BFACB1B85FB1C7BFB5C0CE2E687770>

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

ISO17025.PDF

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

10방송통신서비스_내지최종

<B1A4B0EDC8ABBAB8C7D0BAB8392D345F33C2F75F E687770>

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

제 출 문 식품의약품안전처장/식품의약품안전평가원장 귀하 이 보고서를 과제명(주관연구기관명/주관연구책임자) 과제의 최종보고서로 제출합니다 주관연구기관명 :(주)영양과 미래 주관연구책임자 :정해랑


Output file

30이지은.hwp

¹ýÁ¶ 12¿ù ¼öÁ¤.PDF

0125_ 워크샵 발표자료_완성.key

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


05_±è½Ã¿Ł¿Ü_1130

~41-기술2-충적지반

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

00내지1번2번

07_À±¿ø±æ3ÀüºÎ¼öÁ¤

歯3이화진

슬라이드 1

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

untitled

<32382DC3BBB0A2C0E5BED6C0DA2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

ACB Air Circuit Breaker A-2

step 1-1

민속지_이건욱T 최종

에너지경제연구 제13권 제1호

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

<3136C1FD31C8A320C5EBC7D52E687770>

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

< FC7D1BEE7B4EB2DB9FDC7D0B3EDC3D132382D332E687770>

03±èÀçÈÖ¾ÈÁ¤ÅÂ

사용시 기본적인 주의사항 경고 : 전기 기구를 사용할 때는 다음의 기본적인 주의 사항을 반드시 유의하여야 합니다..제품을 사용하기 전에 반드시 사용법을 정독하십시오. 2.물과 가까운 곳, 욕실이나 부엌 그리고 수영장 같은 곳에서 제품을 사용하지 마십시오. 3.이 제품은

Microsoft PowerPoint - Freebairn, John_ppt

歯Trap관련.PDF

07_Àü¼ºÅÂ_0922

.....hwp


<5B D B3E220C1A634B1C720C1A632C8A320B3EDB9AEC1F628C3D6C1BE292E687770>


歯주5일본문.PDF

300 구보학보 12집. 1),,.,,, TV,,.,,,,,,..,...,....,... (recall). 2) 1) 양웅, 김충현, 김태원, 광고표현 수사법에 따른 이해와 선호 효과: 브랜드 인지도와 의미고정의 영향을 중심으로, 광고학연구 18권 2호, 2007 여름


중국 상장회사의 경영지배구조에 관한 연구

Vol.258 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

Development of culture technic for practical cultivation under structure in Gastrodia elate Blume

GEAR KOREA

<BFACB1B85F D333528C0CCC3B6BCB1295FC3D6C1BEC8AEC1A45FC0CEBCE2BFEB E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 95~118 학술 탄소은행제의가정용전력수요절감효과 분석 1) 2) 3) * ** *** 95

<28BCF6BDC D B0E6B1E2B5B520C1F6BFAABAB020BFA9BCBAC0CFC0DAB8AE20C1A4C3A520C3DFC1F8C0FCB7AB5FC3D6C1BE E E687770>

아니라 일본 지리지, 수로지 5, 지도 6 등을 함께 검토해야 하지만 여기서는 근대기 일본이 편찬한 조선 지리지와 부속지도만으로 연구대상을 한정하 기로 한다. Ⅱ. 1876~1905년 울릉도 독도 서술의 추이 1. 울릉도 독도 호칭의 혼란과 지도상의 불일치 일본이 조선

<B1E2C8B9BEC828BFCFBCBAC1F7C0FC29322E687770>

<C0C7B7CAC0C720BBE7C8B8C0FB20B1E2B4C9B0FA20BAAFC8AD5FC0CCC7F6BCDB2E687770>

Microsoft Word - Westpac Korean Handouts.doc


2. 박주민.hwp


... 수시연구 국가물류비산정및추이분석 Korean Macroeconomic Logistics Costs in 권혁구ㆍ서상범...

01이정훈(113~127)ok


(Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern (Micro- Environment) Re

목차 1. 서론 1.1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1.2. 연구의 내용 및 방법 2. 제품스타일 분석 2.1. 제품이미지 2.2. 미래지향적 스타일 3. 신세대 감성분석 3.1. 라이프스타일 3.2. 광고전략 3.3. 색채에 따른 제품구매 분석 4. 결론 *참고문헌 ( )

< C6AFC1FD28B1C7C7F5C1DF292E687770>

레이아웃 1

216 동북아역사논총 41호 인과 경계공간은 설 자리를 잃고 배제되고 말았다. 본고에서는 근세 대마도에 대한 한국과 일본의 인식을 주로 영토와 경계인 식을 중심으로 고찰하고자 한다. 이 시기 대마도에 대한 한일 양국의 인식을 살펴볼 때는 근대 국민국가적 관점에서 탈피할

000표지

¹Ìµå¹Ì3Â÷Àμâ


Transcription:

Policy Analysis 09-14 The Trend of Revising on the Energy Consumption Efficiency Rating Indication System Eun-Ae Hwang 09 14

머리말,. 2008,.,.,. 6,.

,,.,.. EU,,.,.. 한국소비자원 원장

국문요약 EU,,,.,,,,,,., EU,,. EU. Energy Guide Label Energy Star Program.

. Top Runner Program.,,.,,,.,,,,,,.

차 례 1. 11 2. 13 1. 17 2. 19. 19. 21. 22 3. 22. 23. 25. 28 1. EU 31. 31. 33. 37

2. 40. 40. 41. 45 3. 47. 47. 48. 48 1. 55. 55. 61 2. 65. 65. 67

표차례 < 1> 23 < 2> 25 < 3> 25 < 4> 27 < 5> 36 < 6> 42 < 7> 43 < 8> 44 < 9> 56 < 10> 62

그림차례 < 1> (1990~2006) 11 < 2> 28 < 3> EU 38 < 4> 45 < 5> 49

제 1 장서론

1 11 1. 연구배경및목적 (WEC) ( 原 ) 1990 2006,. < 1>,,, EU,,. : WEC, Energy Efficiency Policies around the world, 2008.,,

12. (IEA).,., 6,..,,,. EU,,, EU

1 13 Top Runner Program, Energy Guide Label Energy Star Program. EU,,,. 2. 연구의범위및방법, EU,,. EU,,.

제 2 장에너지소비효율표시제도의국내체계

2 17 1. 에너지소비효율표시제도의개요,. (MEPS : Minimum Energy Performance Standard), 1~5, 1992. ( ) ( )., ( ), ( ), 3. 1~5,..

18,.,,.,.

2 19 2. 에너지소비효율표시제도의관련법령,,. 가. 에너지이용합리화법 1) 제 15 조 ( 효율관리기자재의지정등 ) 1 ( " " ). < 2008.2.29> 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2 ( )

20.,. < 2008.2.29> 3 2. < 2008.2.29> 4 ㆍ 2. < 2008.2.29> 5 23 ㆍ. < 2008.2.29> 1. ㆍ 2. 2 3. 1 2 2) 제 16 조 ( 효율관리기자재의사후관리 ) 1 15 1 1 3 4

2 21.< 2008.2.29> 2 15 1 2.< 2008.2.29> 3 15 1 1 4.< 2008.2.29> 나. 에너지이용합리화법시행규칙 1 15 1 ( ). 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ( ) 6. 7. 2 1.

22 3 15 1 6 15 2 ( ),. 다. 효율관리기자재운영에관한규정 ( 2009-158 ) 2 4, 5, 5 15, 16.. 3. 에너지소비효율표시제도의주요내용,,,,.

2 23 가. 대상품목및측정방법 22,,,,,.,,. < 1>. 대상품목 측정방법 KS C ISO 15502 (1 365/12) 1 m2 KS C 7601 KS C 8102 (lm/w) (lm/w) ( ) KS C ISO 15502 (1 365/12) 1 (1 (Wh) 150/ ) KS C 7621 (lm) ( : lm/w).

24 대상품목 측정방법 KS C 9321 KS C IEC 60312 ( / ) KS C IEC 61972 (%). KS C 9306 ( (W)/ (W)) KS C 9301 ( / ) KS B 8109 KS B 8127 (%). KS C 9608 1kg (1 (kg)/ (Wh)) 1 m2 ( ( (W)/ ( m2 ) 1kg KS C 7501 ( ) ( ) KS C 7601 KS C 9306 20 ( / ) KS C ISO 15502 (1 365/12)

2 25 < 2>. 측정방법 대상품목,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 나. 표시항목및표시위치 < 3>. 대상품목 표시항목,,,, 1 CO 2, 1m2,,, 1 CO 2,,

26 대상품목 표시항목,, 1 CO 2, 1, 1,, 1 CO 2,,, 1 CO 2,,,,, 1 CO 2,,,, 1 CO 2,,,,, 1 CO 2,, 1, 1 CO 2,,,, 1 CO 2,,, 1kg, 1, 1 CO 2, 1m2,,, 1 CO 2, 1kg,, 1, 1, 1 CO 2,,, 1 CO 2,, 1, 1, 1, 1 CO 2,,, 1 CO 2,,,,, 20,,, 1 CO 2,

2 27, CO 2.,,, < 4>. 표시위치 대상품목,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.

28 다. 등급표시방법및라벨유형 1~5. CO 2.,.,. 22,, 19 3.

제 3 장주요국의관련제도현황

3 31 1. EU 의에너지소비효율표시관련제도현황 가. 에너지소비효율표시관련제도의개요 EU, EU 1992 The Energy Labeling Framework Directive (92/75/EEC).,,,,,,,,, 10.,,,,, 5. A~G EU. A G. EU,. 1 :. 2 :.

32 3. 4 :. 5 EU :., 2005 7 (Energy-using Products; EuP) (The Eco-Disign Directive). EU 20,. EU 19,,,,,.,,,. 14,

3 33,,. EU. 나. 에너지소비효율표시관련제도의개정동향 EU 2005 6 2020 20% Action Plan for Energy Efficiency. EU 20%,.,. EU.,,

34.,.,, (,,,, ). (Ecodesign & Energy Labeling Regulatory Committee) 2009 3 31,,,, A G, A. EU A 2003 A+, A++ 2, A.

3 35 A-20%, A-40%, A-60%, A-80% A. A-20% A 20%, A. A A., A+ A++ A-20%, A-40%.. A, 2008 1 A. A 2010 A. 2009 5 6,,,. 7 (A~G), 3~5

36. 10~20% A., 3.. 1 차기준제정 (2005~2008) 2 차기준제정 (2009~2011) 3 차기준제정 (2012 년이후 ),,,,, (, ),,,,, 2009, 2009 9 60W 2011 9, 40W 25W 2012 9. 2009 2013 2015

3 37. 2009 1 2, 20%. 2009 2010 7 B, C 2012 7 A, 2014 7 A+. 2009 2010 7 B, C 2013 7 A+. EU. 다. 개정된제도의내용을반영한라벨동향,,,, 1, 5. EU < 3>.

38

3 39, A~G 7, A A-20%, A-40%, A-60%, A-80% A. 1,,. A~G. 1.,,. EU.,,.

40 2. 미국의에너지소비효율표시관련제도현황 가. 에너지소비효율표시관련제도의개요., 1975 (Energy Policy and Conservation Act), 1992 (Energy Policy Act) 2, 1987 (National Appliance Energy Conservation Act). (DOE:US Department of Energy), CFR(The Code of Federal Regulations) 1) 10. 1980,,,. 1) The Code of Federal Regulations: (Federal Register). 50 Federal Register. 1 The Code of Federal Regulation(CFR http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-table-search.html).

3 41, 1970. 1980 Appliance Labeling Rule (Energy Policy and Conservation Act) 1987,,,,,,,, 9., (FTC),.. (Sec.333) 1 100. 나. 에너지소비효율표시관련제도의개정동향 2009, 12.

42 가정용기기상업용기기 품 목 영어표기 1 Refrigerators Freezers Refrigerator-freezers 2 Room air conditioners 3 Central air conditioners Central air conditioner heat pumps 4 Water heaters 5 ( ) Furnaces 6 Dishwashers 7 Clothes washers 8 Clothes dryers 9 (*1) Cooking Products 10 Pool heaters 11 Direct heating equipment 12 Fluorescent lamp ballasts 13 General service fluorescent lamps Incandescent reflector lamps - ( ) Television sets (Reserved) - (*2) Showerheads - (*2) Faucets - (*2) Water closets - (*2) Urinals - (*1) Small and large commercial package air conditioning and 14 Electric motors :(*1) =. (*2) = :Energy Policy and Conversation Act Title Ⅲ Part B, C Code of Federal Regulations Part 430 - Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products.

3 43 2009 20, 10. 가정용 기기 품 목 영어표기 1 Refrigerators Freezers Refrigerator-freezers 2 Freezer 3 Room air conditioners 4 Central air conditioners 5 Heat pumps 6 Water heaters 7 ( ) Furnaces 8 Dishwashers 9 Clothes washers 10 Pool heaters - (*1) Fluorescent lamp ballasts - (*1) Fluorescent lamps - (*1) Medium base compact fluorescent lamps - (*1) Incandescent lamps incl refrector lamps - (*2) Showerheads - (*2) Faucets - (*2) Water closets - (*2) Urinals - ) Metal halide lamp fixture - Ceiling fan :(*1) =, (*2) :Code of Federal Regulations 16 Part 305

44, 2001 1 Code of Federal Regulations 16 ChapterⅠ.,. 품 목 기 한, 8 1 7 1 6 1 5 1 3 1,, 1992 (EPA). 2009 2,,, TV, VCR, DVD,,,, PC 60.

3 45 2009 2 17,000 41,000 Energy Star Program 6,300 Energy Star Program. 다. 개정된제도의주요내용을반영한라벨동향,,,, 5, < 4>.

46,,,.,....,., 2007 KWh,....

3 47 3. 일본의에너지소비효율표시관련제도현황 가. 에너지소비효율표시관련제도의개요 Top Runner Program., Top Runner Program 1979,, 1998 11. 20 Top Runner Program.,. ( = ), (%)

48, (JIS). 나. 에너지소비효율표시관련제도의개정동향 2008 5 30, Top Runner Program. 2009 7,,,,,,,, VTR,,,,,,, ( ),,,,, DVD,, L2 23., 2006 10,,. 다. 개정된제도의내용을반영한라벨동향 2006

3 49.,,, < 5>. 1 ( ) 5 ( ) 5

50.,,,. 1 에너지절약성마크,. 2 에너지절약기준달성율 %,. 3 에너지소비효율,. 4 목표연도,.

3 51.,,.

제 4 장현행제도의문제점및개선방안

4 55 1. 현행제도의문제점..,.,,,,. 가. 유용한정보생산의측면,,,, < 9>.

56 한국 E U 미국일본,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 대상 22,,,,, 품목,,, 23.,, 10 11,,,,,,, 측정 방법.,,,, CO 2,, 표시항목 *,, 1,,,, (,,,, ),,,,, 표시,,,, 위치 1~5 A~G 7 ( 1 ( ), A A-20%,, 5 ( 등급 표시 A-40%, A-60%, A-80% ) ) 5

4 57 1) 대상품목의문제, 22.,. 2009 10, 23, EU 11,,.,,., EU,.,.,.

58 2) 측정방법의문제,,.,,..,,,,.,.

4 59 3) 표시항목의문제,.,,,.,. EU..,

60.,. 4) 등급표시의문제,....,,,,, 90% 1.

4 61., EU A A 4.,, 1. 나. 효과적인정보제공의측면.,, < 10>.

62 한국 E U 미국일본 크기 7cm 7cm 7.5cm 17.5cm 13.5cm 18.8cm - 컬러 / 모양 표시항목별제시형태, 표시항목측정조건제시 표시항목 산출단위 /1 /1kg/1 /1 /1 /1 라벨적용시주의사항표시, 추가정보안내유무 비교정보로서특성 A

4 63 1) 표시라벨형태의문제,,, < 10>, EU 7cm 10cm 7cm.,.,,. 2) 표시라벨내용의문제, EU,

64. 1m2, 1,., EU,., EU,.,, EU, 1.

4 65 2. 제도개선을위한시사점,.. 가. 유용한정보생산을위한개선방안 1) 대상품목의정비, 22,,., (, ),.

66 2) 측정방법의표준도입과실제사용패턴의주기적반영,,., EU.,.. 3) 년간전기요금등표시항목의추가,.

4 67,. 4) 에너지소비효율표시방법의변경을통한제품간판별력강화, 1. Energy Guide Label,. 나. 효과적인정보제공을위한개선방안 1) 라벨의형태변경을통한쉽고명확한정보전달력강화,,.

68, 13.5cm 18.8cm 2,.,.,,.,. 2) 라벨표시항목의내용구체화를통해체감정보강화,.,.,,

4 69,.. 1, 1.,.

제 5 장결론

5 73 EU,,,.,.,,,,. EU,,, EU, Top Runner Program, Energy Guide Label Energy Star Program.,,,

74.,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,..

75 [ 참고문헌 ] 1., - -,, 2009. 6. 2.,,, 2009. 6. 3., - -,, 2008. 10. 4.,,, 2009. 8. 5.,,, 2008. 6.,,, 2008. 4. 7.,,, 1998. 8.,,, 2008. 9.,,, 2008,12. 10. IEA, Energy Policy of IEA Contries-Japan, 2008. 11. IEA, Energy Policy of IEA Contries-USA, 2007.

76 12. IEA, Energy Policy Review-EU, 2008. 13. WEC, Energy Efficiency Policies around the world, 2008. 14. 環境省, 環境表示ガイドライソ, 2008. 15. Commission of the European Communities, Directive fo the European Parliament and of the Council on te indication by labelling and standard product informaion of consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products, 2008. < 인터넷홈페이지 > http://www.kotra.or.kr/ http://www.keiti.re.kr/ http://www.mke.go.kr/ http://www.moleg.go.kr/ http://www.kemco.or.kr/ http://www.meti.go.jp/ EU http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm/ http://www.ftc.gov/ http://www.epa.gov/ EU http://www.eceee.org/

Executive Summary 77 Executive Summary The Trend of Revising on the Energy Consumption Efficiency Rating Indication System Eun-Ae Hwang This study examined Korea s legislations and systems related to the Energy Consumption Efficiency Rating Indication System, especially focusing on the program of providing information for consumers. Then it analyzed the relevant systems and the trend of revising those systems in the EU, the U.S. and Japan, where energy efficiency has been continuously improving. Based on that, some implications for enhancing the labeling system in Korea have been drawn, in an effort to strengthen the provision of useful information on the label. The Energy Consumption Efficiency Rating Indication System has been implemented based on the Energy Use Rationalization Act, the Enforcement Regulation of the same Act, and the Regulations on the Operation of High-Efficiency Energy Appliances notified by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy. In order to examine the System especially from a viewpoint of the program of providing information for consumers, various and specific data at both home and abroad have been analyzed. The data include the information indicated on the label under the

78 Regulations on the Operation of High-Efficiency Energy Appliances, applicable items, methods of measurement, indicated items and methods of indication, type of labels and so on. According to the result of analyzing the recent trend of relevant systems in major countries, the EU, the US, and Japan have reinforced their labeling systems by improving the contents and methods of indicating the energy consumption efficiency ratings. More specifically, the EU subdivided the energy consumption efficiency ratings to make it easier to compare the information among different products, and revised the relevant regulations to indicate more detailed information on the label, so that consumers can make their choices based on those energy consumption efficiency data. The U.S. has associated the Energy Guide Label, a mandatory system of labeling the energy consumption efficiency data, with the Energy Star Program, a voluntary program of manufacturers which obligates the provision of certification data for energy efficient products. As a result, both the energy consumption efficiency data and the certification data can be indicated on the same label. Also, while its previous labeling system emphasized the amount of annual energy consumption, under the revised system, information about annual electricity bill is provided so that consumers recognize the energy consumption efficiency as an important

Executive Summary 79 criterion for making their choices when they purchase products. In Japan, the relevant laws and regulations have been revised in a direction to provide more detailed information of the Energy Conservation Label which is based on the Top Runner Program. For example, Japan s new labels offer not only the visual information including the energy consumption efficiency level and whether or not the efficiency target has been met, but also such quantified information as the compliance rate for energy conservation and annual electricity cost. As consumers are provided with such useful data, it became easier for them to compare the information among different products and make rational choices. Also, the value of the label information has been enhanced as critical consumer information. Compared to the recent trend of revising relevant systems in these countries, Korea s current system appears to have some problems in two different perspectives: First, the nation s current labeling system does not seem to encourage the production of useful consumer information that can help consumers select the products with higher energy efficiency; Second, the system is failing to effectively deliver the necessary information through the labeling. Based on this analysis, the study has suggested various improvement measures in an effort to resolve the aforementioned problems and to

80 upgrade the current labeling system so that it can provide more useful information for consumers. The measures include the maintenance of target items, introduction of standard methods of measurement for some items, cyclical reflection of actual usage pattern, addition of labeling items such as annual electricity bill, enhancement of easiness to discriminate the information among different products by changing the method of indicating the energy consumption efficiency data, provision of easier and more accurate information by improving the layouts of the label, and reinforcement of the practical information by offering more detailed labeling information.

에너지소비효율표시제도의개정동향분석 / 2009 12 31 / 2009 12 31 / / 2273 3521 / 137 700 108 / 3460 3000 / 3 348 (1991 5 17 ) 8,000 ISBN 978-89-88087-51-0.