부속

Similar documents
<B9DABCBCC1A45FBCB1B9CCBCF6C1A42E687770>

?6玲狙


2


I&IRC5 TG_08권

pdf 16..

5-김재철


지속가능경영보고서도큐_전체

Page 2 of 5 아니다 means to not be, and is therefore the opposite of 이다. While English simply turns words like to be or to exist negative by adding not,

- 2 -

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

09김정식.PDF

레이아웃 1

Vol.258 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

Microsoft Word - 21KR_Proceeding_2009_

V28.

(2005) ,,.,..,,..,.,,,,,

요 약 대한민국은 1948년 정부수립 이후 60년 만에 세계 13위의 경제대국으로 비약적인 성 장을 이루었다. 정부수립 2년 만에 북한의 전격 남침으로 전 국토가 초토화되었고, 휴 전 이후에도 안보에 대한 위협은 계속되었다. 그러나 대한민국 국민은 불리한 여건에 좌절하

2011´ëÇпø2µµ 24p_0628

노동경제논집 38권 4호 (전체).hwp

레이아웃 1

µðÇÃÇ¥Áö±¤°í´Ü¸é

국제무역론-02장

<3036C0CCBCB1BFEC2E687770>

Microsoft Word - NEW08_prof. Ma

본문01

134 25, 135 3, (Aloysius Pieris) ( r e a l i t y ) ( P o v e r t y ) ( r e l i g i o s i t y ) 1 ) 21, 21, 1) Aloysius Pieris, An Asian Theology of Li

*5£00̽ÅÈ�

우리들이 일반적으로 기호

<C5EBC0CFBFACB1B8BFF85F4B494E5520C5EBC0CFC7C3B7AFBDBA2832C8A3295FB3BBC1F628C0FCC3BC295F37C2F75F E687770>

6 영상기술연구 실감하지 못했을지도 모른다. 하지만 그 이외의 지역에서 3D 영화를 관람하기란 그리 쉬운 일이 아니다. 영화 <아바타> 이후, 티켓 파워에 민감한 국내 대형 극장 체인들이 2D 상영관을 3D 상영관으로 점차적으로 교체하는 추세이긴 하지만, 아직까지는 관

Page 2 of 6 Here are the rules for conjugating Whether (or not) and If when using a Descriptive Verb. The only difference here from Action Verbs is wh

06_À̼º»ó_0929

장양수

하나님의 선한 손의 도우심 이세상에서 가장 큰 축복은 하나님이 나와 함께 하시는 것입니다. 그 이 유는 하나님이 모든 축복의 근원이시기 때문입니다. 에스라서에 보면 하나님의 선한 손의 도우심이 함께 했던 사람의 이야기 가 나와 있는데 에스라 7장은 거듭해서 그 비결을

Microsoft PowerPoint - Freebairn, John_ppt



untitled

중국 상장회사의 경영지배구조에 관한 연구


경제이야기내지_최종수정

歯박효종1-1.PDF

IDP www idp or kr IDP 정책연구 한국경제의구조적문제와개혁방향 민주정책연구원 The Institute for Democracy and Policies

<BCBCB9CCB3AA E32392E687770>

<C5EBC0CFB0FA20C6F2C8AD2E687770>

<2D3828C8AE29B9DAC3B5B1D42E687770>



2 동북아역사논총 50호 구권협정으로 해결됐다 는 일본 정부의 주장에 대해, 일본군 위안부 문제는 일 본 정부 군 등 국가권력이 관여한 반인도적 불법행위이므로 한일청구권협정 에 의해 해결된 것으로 볼 수 없다 는 공식 입장을 밝혔다. 또한 2011년 8월 헌 법재판소는

최종ok-1-4.hwp

Hi-MO 애프터케어 시스템 편 5. 오비맥주 카스 카스 후레쉬 테이블 맥주는 천연식품이다 편 처음 스타일 그대로, 부탁 케어~ Hi-MO 애프터케어 시스템 지속적인 모발 관리로 끝까지 스타일이 유지되도록 독보적이다! 근데 그거 아세요? 맥주도 인공첨가물이

11¹Ú´ö±Ô

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

00글로벌CSR(삼교

Á¶´öÈñ_0304_final.hwp

<4D F736F F D20B0D4C0CCC6AEBFFEC0CC5FBFB9B9AEC7D8BCAE5FB7B9BDBC33342D36362E646F63>

2011 <C560><B274><C5BC><B9AC><D3EC><D2B8> <CD5C><C885>.pdf

?? 1990년대 중반부터 일부 지방에서 자체적인 정책 혁신 을 통해 시도된 대학생촌관 정책은 그 효과에 비자발적 확산 + 대한 긍정적 평가에 힘입어 조금씩 다른 지역으로 수평적 확산이 이루어졌다. 이? + 지방 A 지방 B 비자발적 확산 중앙 중앙정부 정부 비자발적

야쿠르트2010 3월 - 최종

07_À±¿ø±æ3ÀüºÎ¼öÁ¤

歯목차.PDF

¹Ìµå¹Ì3Â÷Àμâ

2

2007 학년도 하반기 졸업작품 아무도 모른다 (Nobody Knows) 얄리, 보마빼 (AIi, Bomaye) 외계인간 ( 外 界 人 間 ) 한국예술종합학교 연극원 극작과 예술전문사 안 재 승

182 동북아역사논총 42호 금융정책이 조선에 어떤 영향을 미쳤는지를 살펴보고자 한다. 일제 대외금융 정책의 기본원칙은 각 식민지와 점령지마다 별도의 발권은행을 수립하여 일본 은행권이 아닌 각 지역 통화를 발행케 한 점에 있다. 이들 통화는 일본은행권 과 等 價 로 연

<C0CEBCE2BFEB5FBFACB1B85F D32322D3528BAAFBCF6C1A4295F FBCF6C1A42E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

2 KHU 글로벌 기업법무 리뷰 제2권 제1호 또 내용적으로 중대한 위기를 맞이하게 되었고, 개인은 흡사 어항 속의 금붕어 와 같은 신세로 전락할 운명에 처해있다. 현대정보화 사회에서 개인의 사적 영역이 얼마나 침해되고 있는지 는 양 비디오 사건 과 같은 연예인들의 사

<B1E2C8B9BEC828BFCFBCBAC1F7C0FC29322E687770>

Output file

08년요람001~016


#Ȳ¿ë¼®

, ( ) * 1) *** *** (KCGS) 2003, 2004 (CGI),. (+),.,,,.,. (endogeneity) (reverse causality),.,,,. I ( ) *. ** ***

74 현대정치연구 2015년 봄호(제8권 제1호) Ⅰ. 서론 2015년 1월 7일, 프랑스 파리에서 총격 사건이 발생했다. 두 명의 남성이 풍자 잡지 주간 샤를리 의 본사에 침입하여 총기를 난사한 것이다. 이 사건으로 인해 열두 명의 사람이 목숨을 잃었다. 얼마 후에

< C7CFB9DDB1E22028C6EDC1FD292E687770>

歯4차학술대회원고(황수경이상호).PDF

목차 1. 서론 1.1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1.2. 연구의 내용 및 방법 2. 제품스타일 분석 2.1. 제품이미지 2.2. 미래지향적 스타일 3. 신세대 감성분석 3.1. 라이프스타일 3.2. 광고전략 3.3. 색채에 따른 제품구매 분석 4. 결론 *참고문헌 ( )

<BED6C7C3BCD2BDBA5F4B5350BBFDBBEABCBA31C0E5312D32302E70312E504446>

슬라이드 1

1-국가봄-박영준(5-37).hwp

<3132B1C732C8A328C0DBBEF7292E687770>

02양은용

삼교-1-4.hwp

ㅍㅍㅍㅍ통계지식과 경제적 상상의 구축

Main Title

¨è ¿¬Â÷º¸°í¼Ł³»Áö-1 PDF

02. 특2 원혜욱 지니 3.hwp

<283129C1A4C1F8BEC62E687770>

조재욱D)-63-88

泰 東 古 典 硏 究 第 24 輯 이상적인 정치 사회의 구현 이라는 의미를 가지므로, 따라서 천인 합일론은 가장 적극적인 경세의 이론이 된다고 할 수 있다. 권근은 경서의 내용 중에서 현실 정치의 귀감으로 삼을 만한 천인합일의 원칙과 사례들을 발견하고, 이를 연구하여

Vol.257 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

Stage 2 First Phonics

µðÇÃÇ¥Áö±¤°í´Ü¸é

퇴좈저널36호-4차-T.ps, page Preflight (2)

항공우주뉴스레터-제13호-컬러3

18 박 준( ).hwp

Transcription:

1955., { } { } { }. 1 2000 8 9 2 2000 8 22 1976 3 19 ( 7-15 ) 110-070 4 503 (02)737-6064 (02)730-8757 www.ypub.co.kr 2000 ISBN 89-7278-221-1 03810

1997.,,.,.. 1998-5.8% 1999 10.2%, 2000 7%.,,..,....,. 5

1960. 30.,. 1997..,.., 1,..,.. 2., 6

.,.,,.,..,.,. 2,. 2, {.}. 2000.. 2 7

.,..,.,.,,......,.,..,... 8

^,, 1985. ^,, 1992. ^,, 1999. ^,, 1998. ^,, 1994. ^, 1991. ^,, 2000. ^,, 1999. ^,, 1971. ^,, 1994. ^,, 1994. ^,, 1992. ^,, 1989. ^ @,, 1994.,... ^, ^., ^ ^ (!). 9

....,...,.,.,..... 10

5 17 / / 28 / 37 / / / 49 53 60 / 66 / / 80 /

89, / 99 106 / / / / 130 / 147 / / / 172 184 191 213 220 / 233 / 240

249 / / 261 / 274 281 286 293 297 309

1

21?,..,,..,.,. 17

,.,.,...,.,,..,.,....... 18

...,..,.,.,.,...,., 19

. 2 1776.,...,, ;..,... _. 20

,,,.. ^....,.,. _.. 21

.,,.,,,,,,,.,.,.,...,. 22

., X. WW WW 1 {?} {..}.... 2 23

. A 3,..,,.,...,...... 24

..,.,.,....,....,. 4... { } 25

^ ^.......,,,.....,.,..,.,.. 26

..,,.,..,,. (.).,.,. * *. {. _. _ }( ). ( ).. 27

..,...,,.,.. 28

..............,. [,!]...,... [,!]... 29

...,, ( ), ^.... _!.....,,.,,.,.,......... 30

. { } { }. { }.,. ^ ^.....,.... { }....,., { } { }.......,.. 31

..,..,,.,. ( :,., 4 40..,. 2 20..).. 32

,. Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country..,......,,.,,........ 33

........,........,,,.. 5.,... 34

.. ^ ^. { }.,...., $..,,..,.., 35

..,....,....,.....,. 36

...,.,.. 37

..,,... 6.....,,.,.,., ( ). 38

2000 7 1. ( ^ ^.),., 30. ({ }, { }..)....,. ^ ^,.... 39

,....,......,.... 40

..,.... (,.),..,.. ( ),.,,,.. { }.. {!}.,. 41

.... 7...,.....,,,.. 42

.. (!..) 2000 6 { } ^ ^., ( ).. (1999 11 15 { } 1,.)..,.,.,.,. ( 43

...).. [ ]........ ( 9,470.....,..) ( ) { }.., 44

. { },.. (.).., { }..,,,..,. ( ),.....,.,. * 45

[ ]........,.., ( ) 8,.. *, 10 48~60, 45~60 151~195. 1,150, 55,200~69,000, 173,650~224,250. 1999 11 6,600. 1 3 3 1, 3~11..,.,, 1999. 2.. 46

,....... 9....,. (.),. ( ).. 47

...,,,. ( ). (.) { }.,.,.,., *. { },.,.. *,.,. { }. (.).. 48

.....,.,.. _,. 49

.. [ ].,, [ ]. 1,....,.. ( )..., 50

...... 2000......, { } ^ ^.,. 51

B 10,..,......... 52

. {?}, {.}. C {?}, {.}. {.}, {.}... 53

.,... {.} 11.......,..,. 54

,.,, 12.,,,, justice. _.,,. injustice. _,.., _.....,.., [ ], [ ]., 55

,.,.. {, }....... 56

2

...... 59

.,.,.. { resource curse}..,.. 60

,.,., rent.. (.)....... 61

.,,,.. 1,.,....,,.,,,,,,,,.. _ 62

. 2.,..,,..,,..,.... 63

,. D 2. _.,. _ ( ). * _,,. _,. _ _ _ _ *,. 64

,.. 65

,.,,... @,..,,.. [ ]... 66

,,..,..,.,..,. @. @ 100, 100. 2 67

, 100.,.,..,,...,..,.,.,.,.,,, 68

....,.. ( )..,,. { }, 3 1960. 1970.. 1965 {, 1964: } 4, 69

,,. (..) 1960.. @.. 30,. 5, @..,,. 70

,.....,.. { }..,.,.,,,,.,.,,., 71

,.,,..,.,.. Young, 1966~1990 10.3% 8.6%, 1.7%. 6,. 6@25,,. 30 @,..,,. 72

. 1997 1.,......,.,.,..,. 73

,,,..,..,..,.,. ( { })..,....,., 74

,...,. { }.. ^ ^..,., { }... { }..,.,..,. { moral hazard}. ({ }.).. { }. { } { }... 75

.,... { }......,,.,..,.,, _. _. ( ), {, } 7., _ _ 76

. 10%. * 90%, 3~4.... ( { }.). 8 { },.... * {1997 30 3.3%, 3.3%, 6.6%. 21.7%, 70.4%. _ 21.7% 1~2%. 8~9%, 90%.}, {,},, 1999, 430-431. 40%. { }. 77

... (.),.. @ { }..,.......... *, *.. 78

,... { }... *.,,.,.,,,,. 9.. *... 79

{ }. 1960. 1970. { }..,..,. (.),.. 80

...... { }.. ^. 100 30 50. 30 100 50., ( ),.,, ( ).. 81

,,.,...,..., { },... (..) 1993, 10,... 82

,,,,,,,...,, 11 { }.,,,,..,..,,. 1973~1979 1.5%....., 83

,.., 5 1..,, 1 5 1,.....,,..,,,. 12. 1.2%. ( 84

1.2%. 100 30, 5% 432, 1.2% 6.2% 608 1.4.). 13, (1960 ) (1980 ),,, 8... 1980 ( @ ) 1989,,. 7 1996 3 2... 14.. 15 61 1,276., 10%.. 85

,...,.,. 2,200.. 86

3

,..., 2... 17,. 19 (?~ 1100?)., 31, 89

,. 12, ( 1122?~771), ( 770~256). 37., 71 170.,. 403,,,. 20,, @ @ @ @ @ @,, 221. ( 551~479).,. X. *, @ @ 90

@.,. { }, 1,.,,. ( 385~304),.,.,. (?~645),,, ( 390~338) 2,. (?~208) *,,,, 1994, 30. X [ X ]., 9,., 91

,., ( 280?~233?).,. *, 3, 4.. ( ),.,.,,,,. ( ) {, ( ), 5 ( ),, 6, }. * [ ], [ ].,. 92

,, [ ] [ ] [ ] [ [ ] 10. [ ]. ( ). _, ( ) [ ] [ ], {,.}, {.}..,... {.,..,..}.. ( ).,., 93

,. 2 7 ( 156~87).,. 2, { [ ].} 7.. { } 8..,., ( 1608 ~1623),. (1501~1572) (1535~1623)., 9 94

.., F. {.}... {.}... {?} {..}.., 95

... 2,200...,.., 19 *..,, {.} 10, *,,, 1898,.,. 103,., { },,,, 1999. 96

.,..,,,, @ @.., {, } 11....., { }, 12,... 2000, 97

.,,.. 98

.... (.).,. (.).,.,, 99

. _,.,. _ 13..,..,..,.,,. 100

,,. _. _ 14 15, { }....,,....,.,,., 101

W hen we obey laws, in the sense of general abstract rules laid down irrespective of their application to us, we are not subject to another man]s will and are therefore free. 16,,. *.,. 100 80. { }. 80. 80.. *..,.. 102

[ ]. 80., 79... ( ) 80.. [ ]...,.. { }. 80.. * [ ]...... 100 *., 103

. ^. 20 [ ]. ^ ^. [ ].. 80 20, [ ]. 30. 70 10. 30. 10. 20 70 10 _..,.. 80... 20.....?.. 5 80. 5. (400. 104

.). 5 100. 5 80 5 20.. 80. 5 5.., ( )..,.,,.,.... *. ^. * { }.,,.,. ^137 ^., 105

.,. 17 2,... 106

......,. 18.,. _. _, 107

...,. (.),...,.,.. _.,.. _, 108

^,.., 2000. ( ).,....,.,,, 109

...,,...,,.,..,. 19,, 110

,..., ( )..,.. 20..,, 111

.. { } { }. (.).,.... { }, { }... ( ),. 112

....,.. 1,,. 21., 113

,.,,.,,.,....,....,,,,,.,. ^ ^,. {, ; ; 114

.}...,..,,.,,... _,., 115

,....,...,. _,. _ ( ) { } 22. _ _ 23 (!). _?,. 116

,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,.. 3..,..,..,. ( )., 117

.. 3 { }...,,,.,..., * * 536,,. 118

..,....,,,....,. { Y **.,. **.,., 119

}... { } 24. 3.,.,.,,. ( ) 25 120

....... ^ ^....,,.....,.,.., 121

26... {.}.....,...... 122

{ }..,,.,. 27,. 28.,.,., 123

,,,. 29,. G X. 30. _,.., 31 124

.,. _,..,.,., 50,.. ^., 125

*.., ( ),,,.,..,...,... *. {.. } ( ).. 126

. ^.,.,,,,,.,,,,......,.,, 127

(1469~1527).. 1762 ( 2 3 6 ). { ^ ^. _ 1 ^ ^, _.} (, { },..,.... 128

,,,, 1994.),., { }..., {. }, {.. }., 129

.,..... 130

{ }. { }...,,.,.,.,....., 131

{?}, {.}. {?}, {.}. {?}, {,.,.}...,.. 1997..,,,. 132

.,, _. _,, _. _ _ _ 32.... 33... {, 133

.}.... _. _..,..,..,...., 134

.,.,..,,,..,,. ( [ ] ) { }.,.. { }. { }. { }. [ ( ) ]. { }..,, 135

,,,,. * 34,,.,.,. { } { }. { }.,. { }..,. *,,. 136

...,,,,,,..,..,,.,, 137

@ @,.,.,...,,,.,,.,.,,. _ ( ) { }. 138

,,,.. ( ),..,......,.. ( ). 10, 139

,... { } { }.. 3D { }.,.,,. { }.. ( { }.)., 140

.,... ( ),. 35,.,,. ( ) ( )., 141

.. ( ^181 ^.).,...,.,. G,., 142

.,,...,,.,..,.., 143

4

..,... 147

.,,.,,. _. _,.,.,..,,. 148

..,. 2,200,,.,, ^ ^....,..,,..,,.,.,,.,. 149

( ),.,.,..,... 2000..,,... {?} {.,.},.. 150

,... {?} {.}. {.} {.} {,?} {.} {?} {,,,.} {.} {.}..,. {.} {?} {,..} {.} (?) { }... (...) {?} {.}. {.} {,.} (.)... {, 151

.}. (.)... {.} {?} {.} {?} {.} {?} {.} {?} {?.} {?} {.}.. {?} {.} {?} {.} {?} {..} {,?} {?} {!}......... 10.....,. 152

{ } :. 153

. (.).......,. (.)....,... {.} (.)....... (.).. *..... *, { } { }.. 154

.,. (.)...., 2.(, 3,600.)............ (.)...,...... {?} {?} {.}.,.,,... % { } 155

, %. { },..........,..,..... (., 10.) *,. *,,. {4,520.}, {?}..,,,.. 156

.,.,...........,,.....,,,....,. 157

.... [ ]. [ ]....., ( )... [ ]..,.,...,.,..... 158

... ^. ( : 2000 2 7,,.,.., @,.),..,.. 159

..,.,.,,,, ( ). [ ] 1999... 160

,...,..,..,... * 3 161

.,.,..,....,,.,. * 17 { }.. { }, { }. 162

,,. ( ). **,.,,,,,..,. {.},. **. {,. }( ). 185. 163

.,,,,,,,,..,,. 2, { }...,...... 1 164

{(,),.,.},, {..,,..,.,.,.}... 165

. 104.,... [ ],.,.,,.. 166

..,.,,,...... (.)..,. 167

....,....... (.),,,. 168

,,..,,...,,. *,,. 2 *..,,,, 1991( 1945), 442.. 169

,.....,. ( ). 2... ( )... 3 170

,,....,,,,. 171

.. ( ), ( ). 4..,... 172

... { }.....,.....,.,.....,... 173

.,,.,,.,..,.,.., { },..,.,,.,,,,...,,,... 174

,.,.,. { },......,,,..,....,,.. 175

,. { }.,...,., 16...,..,.,., 5, 5., 5., 5 5., 5.., 176

,,. ( ),..,,.,,,....... ( ),,.. 177

.. ( ^.,.)..,.........,....,. 178

.....,...... 5. *,,... * Verbandsklage.,.,.,,. 179

... ^ ^ 5, 5. 10% 5, 1 40, 20. { }. 40, 40. { } ^ ^.... class action.., 40 20.,.., 180

,. *, { }...,. { }. punitive damage. ^ ^.,.... *.. 181

..,....,,,,.,...,.,. 10 { },. { }. { }, 182

... { }.. { },.... 183

.,.,. ( ),,. _. * _ { }. _ 184

_,...,.. _ @.. _ 6 *,. {. }( )., :,, 1995. 185

,........, 20...,...... { },., 186

...,.. 10 1..,. { tragedy of the commons}..,.,..,.,.,... 187

. 1215 Magna Carta,,.,..,. 20. *,,,...,..,. {, *,.. 2.,. 188

.} 7. 2000....,...,......, [ ].,,, ( ).. 189

,.,. [ ]...,,..,,.,.. (.),. 190

... (.).....,, ( )....., 191

,....,. * { }. (.)...,,..,.,........,., *,.,,. 192

........ { }..,..,. 21.,.., @.. * *., 193

...,....,.. ^ ^...,. 8,. { } 2002. 194

.,...,..... ^ ^...,,,,... 3. { }. 195

,.,,.....,..,.. { }....... 196

. @ @...,..,..,. @..,. ^ ^.,...,..,.. 197

... 5.. 21. ^ ^,. ( )..,.... ( )..,..,,. (1999 58.1%, 198

..)..,.. ^.....,. (. { },.)...,..,. 199

. < 1>.,,. * < 1> ^,., [ ],... *.. [ ].. [ ]....... ( 200

< 2> < 3>,., < 2>...., < 3>.,. [ ].,. ( { }.),,....).,.. (.),. [ ], 201

..,, [ ]... 1980..,....,.....,...... 1920 1933.,. 202

,. ( ) { }.,, { }.,,. (,.,.).. 1,, 3.3% 13.6%. 9.... (.), ( ).. 203

. *.....,...,.. ( { }.). { }.. { }..,,.. *.,. 204

, ( ),..... { } { }.,., { }..........., * *, { }. { }. 205

( ),....... { }....,, ^. { }. (,..)....... 206

. (, { }.).,....,,.. { },.,.. (.),.., { }.,.... 207

. ( ) [ ].,...,,......,... *,,,. { }..... * { }.. 208

.. 10,..,,.,... [ ]......,,, { } { },,..,. { }...,. 209

..,.,,. ( {40 }.) { }.,....,,.. { }, { }...,. (.) 210

5

92.1% (, 1999 6 7 ), 95% (, 1999 2 26 )., 95%, 70%., (, 1998 8 24 ). 21 (, 1998 8 13 ), (17.8%) (30.9%) (, 1998 12 26 ). 213

....,..,,.,., ( )..,.,.,. { the abuse of pub- 214

lic power for private benefit}.,... $,,.. ( ). $ $ (H),.,., [ ]. { },..,, 215

. { - }. principal agent.,,,,. -.,,,. (.),.......,., 216

. I 1, ( ), ( ).,. { }. {, }.....,. { }.. 217

,..,. *.. (.),..,,.... * family, {cosa nostra}, { } { },., ( ) ^ 1999 99 38.,... 218

, ( ),..,...,...,,. ( ),...,. 219

,..,.,... { _},., 220

.,.....,, { }.,,,.,,., { }..,..,....,,.,. 221

. 2,,. ^..,..,.... 222

.,,. { }.,., { [ ].} 3,,,.,,.....,,..,...,. 223

. (,,.).....,.,,..,,... -,... 224

.,.,, ( )..,.,. corruption with theft corruption without theft. 4,..,,. 5.,,,..... 225

...,,...... *.., 6,,, 32%.,.. 7.., 8 5% *.. 226

0.5%.,....,. 9 ( ). ( ).....,. 91, 10,...,. { } { } 227

..,., ^,.. ( ),.,.. 11,..,.,...,.. 228

.,.,. 12,. 59,. 13 { }......, ( ).., ( ),..,..,. 229

.. ( )., ^ ^..,...,. ( ),.,..,.,. 230

L L 14.,.,., ( ).....,.. 231

,. 232

.....,. 1995., 1999 99 50. * *. 1995~1999, /, 27/41, 27/54, 34/52, 43/85, 50/99.. 1999, 99 47, 43, 48, 45, 50. 1999 2. 18,,. (,.) http://www.transparency.de/. 233

....... { },.. 15,,.,.,.,...., 234

,.,..,,.,,.,,.,., { }.,,,,..,,..,. 235

,.,.,..,,..,., 16 ( ).,,..,. 236

..... (, 15 60, 20 237

..).,..,.,.., 15..,.,,,.... 238

.,.,.,...,.,,.,...,. 239

,....,.....,..,.., 240

,.. { }............ ( )..,..,,.,.,, 241

.,,.,....,..,. [ ],.. 242

,.,,......,,.,..,..,. ( ), 243

( )..,.,. { }. ( ),,..,.., 244

.., 18 {.,.} 17..,,. 245

6

.,,..,.. { },... 249

,... { }..,. { }.,,..,..,.,.,.... 1 250

.,.....,,..,.., ( ),.,..,,.. 251

.....,.,...,....,.,.. 252

J 2 4..,.. 3, 4 1, 1 1. 4 1. ( ) ( ) 4 1 4 1 1 1,. 1 1, 4. 1,. 1 { }. 4. identity bias., 3. 253

. 4, 100 60 3, 40 3. 180 120 60. 60 45, 15 55. 55. 15 40 25 3 (-3) (-3) 0 ^55 ^55 ^55 15 55, 45 55.. 60 2 40 3, 60 1 40. 55. 15 40 15 1 0 0 ^55 ^55 ^55... 60, 254

60 40.,., 55,.,... 5. ( )., { }, ( ). 6,.,.,. 255

.., 50 2 100, 50., 50, 4 50 6 100, 6 100. 7. 4 50 6 100 4, 50 2 100... { }...,,...,,.., 256

.. K < 8...,..,.. { }. 9,.,..,..., 257

.,.,,....,.,. { }....,., 258

,.....,,.,,,.,,.,,..,.. 10,,. (,.),,., 259

,.,.,... 260

. 11.., { }.,....,,,.. 261

..,., ^ ^..,,..,. (.)...,,,.,,,. 262

. 12.,., ( )..,.,. { },.,,.,...,.,,.,. 263

,...,.,,.,.,..,.,.....,,. 264

..,,.,.. { adaptive efficiency}. 13.,..,...,.. 265

,..,.. 100.,...,...,,,,..,,.,. * 266

.,..,..,.,.,.,..,., *... 267

.,..,..,..,.,,,...,... 268

... 18.,..,..,..,.,......, 269

,. ( ),,. ( ) { } 14. 270

7

.,.,. 273

{ }..,... ^ ^.., {.,. 274

.} 1,., {,.,.?} 2, { }., 1980.. * { }, ( ). ** * Paul Krugman, Peddling Prosperity, W. W. Norton & Company, 1994. { }...,. **,. 275

.. 3.. { }. 4,..,.. *.,,. ( ) *,. (. {. L }.),.. 276

. { }. { }.,.,.,.,,. { } { }., 3... (,,.) ^ ^,. 277

,..., New Keynesian. { },.,.. { } ( ),. { }.,.... { }. 278

..,., { } { }. (,,.).....,... { } { }. (,.) 279

...,, 5,.,,.. { },. 280

,.,,., 2000.,.....?.. 281

..., { }. { }.. { }., ^ ^...,,,.. { }.,.,.., { },. * * ^ ^, 282

. { }. 21... ** ( ),. ( ),... { }, { }... **, ( ). ^ ; ; ; ; ;. { ; }.,. 283

., { }.,..... 6 1998,,,,. 7 Liberalism,, *.....,. * { liberation}. 284

,...,.,... 285

. {IMF (]97~]99 ) _ IMF _ IMF (*OECD )}. 8 1997 0.283, 1998 0.316, 1999 0.320, (0.401;1994), (0.537;1995), (0.325; 1990), (0.315;1994), (0.250;1992). ( 1, 0.) { }. ( Gini 286

Genie.) 10%. 10%... 1999 10% (!) 562, 277. * 82%, 84%., 309, 59, 33 400, 25, 20, 24, 93 562. 10% ^ 43.7 ^ 309 20,..,!!!????.. { }.. { }.,, @ @ @, @ @, * 10% 60, 75. 287

.,....,.,.?..,. 1999 5,246, 9,. 10% 301.... (.) @ 288

{ }. 5,, @ @ @,.,.. { }. { }. *.... ^ ^ ;... *.,..,. 289

..., { }.,. 10, 20...,,...., ( ).. ( 10% 20.),.,.., 290

. *....... 0.86, 0.96. 10 ( 1.) ** 1993~1995, 0.90, 0.70 * @, { :, }(KDI, 1998 I@II, 153-214), 1993 0.306, 1994 0.363., {, }(, 2000. 2), { 97 0.399 99 3/4 0.423 }. ** 0. { }.. 291

, 0.70. 11 0.32,... ^,. 292

21.. 1960....... 12,.,,,.,,. 293

., ^ ^.,, { }.... ^ ^.... 1787 ^ 1789 ^. 1863, 1964. { }..,. 1948, 294

......,,,...,,.. ( ).,...,... 295

.,.. { }.. 2000 3000. 296

: [ ] [ ]. :. :. :,. :. :~. :. :,. :. < M N 297

O M, N:. :. :. :,,. :. O:. :. :. :. :. :. :. :. :,. (= ):. M an has almost constant occasion for the help of his brethren, and it is in vain for him to expect it from their benevolence only. He will be more likely to prevail if he can interest their self-love in his favour, and show them that it is for their own advantage to do for him what he requires of them. Whoever offers to another a bargain of any kind, proposes to do this. Give me that which I want, and you shall have this which you want, is the meaning of every such offer; and it is in this manner that we obtain from one another the far greater part of those good offices which we stand in need of. It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities but of their advantages. Nobody but a beggar chooses to depend chiefly upon the benevolence of his fellow-citizens. Even a beggar does not depend upon it entirely. _ With the money which one man gives him he purchases food. The old clothes which another bestows upon him he exchanges for other old clothes which suit him better, or for lodging, or for food, or for money, with which he can buy either food, clothes, or lodging, as he has occasion. (Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 1776, Chapter 2.) 298

_ PQ :. :. PQ:. : ( [ ] ). :. :. RS $ TU $ S TU R:. S:. :. :. TU:. :. :. :. :. :. V W V:. :. :. W:. X 299

X Y Y X :. :. X:. Y:. :. _ _ Z :. Z:. :. C :. :. :. :. :. Beneficence is always free, it cannot be extorted by force _ There is, however, another virtue, of which the observance is not left to the freedom of our own wills, which may be extorted by force, and of which 300

the violation exposes to resentment, and consequently to punishment. This virtue is justice. _ Beneficence, therefore, is less essential to the existence of society than justice. Society may subsist, though not in the most comfortable state, without beneficence; but the prevalence of injustice must utterly destroy it. _ Beneficence is the ornament which embellishes, not the foundation which supports the building, and which it was, therefore, sufficient to recommend, but by no means necessary to impose. Justice, on the contrary, is the main pillar that upholds the whole edifice. If it is removed, the great, the immense fabric of human society... must in a moment crumble into atoms. (Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, 1759, Part 2 Section 2 Chapters 1 and 3.) a _ a:. :. :. :,,,,,. :. :, :,. :. :. :. :. :. :,. :,. 301

L b L _ L c :. :. :. :. :,. :. L:. :,. b:. :. :. :,. c:,. :. F F d e F d e e e 302

d :. :. d:. e:. :. :. :. z :. z:. _ :. :,. :. :. :. fg fg:. :. :. :,. 303

Y Y Y Y :. :. :. :. h X i _ h:. : ( ; ). : G. i:. :,. _ :,. :. :. 304

:. :60. :70. :. :. :. j :. :. j:. :. :. :. :. Given individuals whom we are prepared to regard as alike in ability and initial resources, if some have a greater taste for leisure and others for marketable goods, inequality of return through the market is necessary to achieve equality of total return or equality of treatment. One man may prefer a routine job with much time off for basking in the sun to a more exacting job paying a higher salary; another man may prefer the opposite. If both were paid equally in money, their incomes in a more fundamental sense would be unequal. Similarly, equal treatment requires that an individual be paid more for a dirty, unattractive job than for a pleasant rewarding one. _ Differences of money income _ are {equalizing differences} required to make the 305

whole of the {net advantages,} pecuniary and non-pecuniary, the same. (Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press, 1962, p.162.) :. :. _ _ k l k:. l:. m m:. :. :. :. :. 306

:. :. :. :,,. :. :. :. :. :. 307

1 W:. : X. 91. 2 :. 3 A :. [ ]. 4 :.. 5 :. 6 :. 7 :. :. 8. 1, 2, 3. 9,. 1999 47,507 17,462, 13,981. 13,510 2,554. 10 B:. 11, { @ },,, 1996, 205... 12 free [ ] [ ]. 309

1 {political economy}. {economy} {oikos( )} {nemein( )} { }, {political} {polis}, {political economy}.. 2 D:. 3 Paul Krugman, {The myth of Asia]s miracle,} Foreign Affairs v73 n6 (November 1994). 4 Joan Robinson, {Korea, 1964:economic miracle,} Collected Economic Papers v3, 1965. 5. Dani Rodrik, {Getting interventions right:how South Korea and Taiwan grew rich,} Economic Policy (April 1995). 6 Alwyn Young, {The tyranny of numbers:confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience,} Quarterly Journal of Economics v110 n3 (August 1995)., 1994 { }.,. @, { }, KDI 1999 4/4.. 7 58. 8 1990, { }, KDI 1999 I, 3-52. 9,, { @ }, KDI 1998 I@II. 310

10 Douglas C. North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, 1990, p.3. 11 Mancur Olson, {Big bills left on the sidewalk:why some nations are rich, and others poor,} Journal of Economic Perspectives v10 n2 (Spring 1996), p.19. 12 Stephen Knack, and Philip Keefer, {Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures,} Economics and Politics v7 n3 (November 1995). 13 Dani Rodrik, {TFPG controversies, institutions, and economic performance in East Asia,} NBER Working Paper n5914 (February 1997). 14 Joseph Stiglitz, {Whither reform:ten years of the transition,} Paper presented to 1999 World Bank]s annual bank conference on development economics, 1999. 15 Jonathan Isham, and Daniel Kaufmann, {The forgotten rationale for policy reform:the productivity of investment projects,} Quarterly Journal of Economics v114 n1 (February 1999). 1. 2,.. 3,.,,,, 1999 ( 1961), 3 { }.,, @ @ @. 4,.,.,. 5,,.,, 1 { }. 311

6,, b,,. 7,,, 1994, 473. 8, {,},,, 1999, 135. 9 { },, :,, 1995. 10, { },,,, 1999, 380. 11,, ( ),, 1997( 1967), 382. 12. 13 :. 14 :..,. {,,. } @ @. 15 n,. 16 F. A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty, University of Chicago, 1960, p.153. 17 :. :. 18 :.. 19 :. :,. :. 20 :. :. 21 :. :. 22 60. 23 :. :. :. 24 65. 25 [ ],. :. :. 26 :. :. :. 27 :. :. :. 312

28 :. 29 :,. :. 30., {,. } 31,. 32 :. :. 33 :. :,. 34 :. :. 35. 1 100,. 2 :. :. 3 :. :. :. :. :. 4 :. :. 5 :. 6 :~. :. :. 7 World Bank, World Development Report, 1998, p.1. 8 :. :. :. 9 @, { }, KDI 1998, I@II. 1 I:. 2 :. 3 Pranab Bardhan, {Corruption and development:a review of issues,} Journal of Economic Literature v35 n3 (September 1997). 313

4 Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny, {Corruption,} Quarterly Journal of Economics v108 n3 (August 1993). 5 cost-reducing corruption surplusshifting corruption. Christopher Bliss, and Rafael Di Tella, {Does competition kill corruption?} Journal of Political Economy v105 n5 (1997). Bardhan collusive corruption..,,. 6 Shang-Jin Wei, {Why is corruption so much more taxing than tax? Arbitrariness kills.} NBER Working Paper n6255 (November 1997). 7 OECD,,. Shang-Jin Wei, {How taxing is corruption on international investors?} NBER Working Paper n6030 (May 1997). 8 Paolo Mauro, {Corruption and growth,} Quarterly Journal of Economics v110 n3 (August 1995). 9 Lui { }. Francis T. Lui, {Three aspects of corruption,} Contemporary Economic Policy v14 n3 (July 1996).. 10 Kevin M. Murphy, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny, {The allocation of talent:implication for growth,} Quarterly Journal of Economics v106 n2 (May 1991). 11 Christopher Bliss, and Rafael Di Tella, {Does competition kill corruption?} Journal of Political Economy v105 n5 (1997). 12,. Daniel Kaufmann, and Shang-Jin Wei, {Does [grease money] speed up the wheels of commerce?} NBER Working Paper n7093 (April 1999)... 13 Cheryl W. Gray, and Daniel Kaufmann, {Corruption and development,} Finance and Development (March 1998). 314

14 L:. :. 15 Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny, {Corruption,} Quarterly Journal of Economics v108 n3 (August 1993). 16... 17 R. M. Jackson, The Machinery of Local Government, London:MacMillan, 1958, p.345. 1 A. Alesina and A. Drazen, {Why are stabilizations delayed?} American Economic Review v81 n5 (December 1991):1170-1188. 2 J:. :. 3 Mancur Olson, The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, 1971. 4 Raquel Fernandez, and Dani Rodrik, {Resistance to reform:status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty,} American Economic Review v81 n3 (December 1991). Dani Rodrik, {Understanding economic policy reform,} Journal of Economic Literature v34 n1 (March 1996), p.37. 5. 100 40 5 60 2, 40 10. 90 :5*(30/90)+(-2)*(60/90)=30/90., 30 60. 6 { }, 1990 1 2,000, 15.5%. -. @ @, :1990,, 1993. 7 George Ainslie, {Derivation of [rational] economic behavior from hyperbolic discount curves,} American Economic Review v81 n2 (May 1991), p.334. 315

8 :. :. K:. :. 9 William Easterly, and Ross Levine, {Africa]s growth tragedy:policies and ethnic divisions,} Quarterly Journal of Economics v112 n4 (November 1997). 10 Kevin M. Murphy, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny, {Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth?} American Economic Review v83 n2 (May 1993). 11.,.,,.,,.,,. Douglas C. North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, 1990, p.95. 12 { }.,. 13 North,, p.80. 14 47. 1, { }, @,,, 2000. 2, { }, @,,, 2000. 3, {[ ] },,,, 1999. 4, (, 1998),. 5,,, 1999. 6. 7 Amartya Sen, Inequality Reexamined, Harvard University Press, 1995. 316

8 1, { }, 2000. 4. (.), 1999, 297, { }( 2000. 2.). 9 5,246 2,931 1,236 1,696, 2,314 1,527 788. (.) 10 @. 1993.. 11 @,. 12 Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press, 1999. 317

DJ 2000 21 016 327 9593 coverdesign@hotmail.com

1997 2 2000 1955 1978 1989 1988 ~ 1989 1990 ~

21 2 ISBN 89-7278-221-1