07½Å¿µÀü

Similar documents

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구



,......

1..


012임수진

Vol.259 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

00약제부봄호c03逞풚


서론 34 2

Lumbar spine


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

< FB4EBB1B8BDC320BAB8B0C7BAB9C1F6C5EBB0E8BFACBAB820B9DFB0A320BFACB1B85FBEF6B1E2BAB92E687770>

hwp

<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>


저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

(Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern (Micro- Environment) Re

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

PHI Report 시민건강이슈 Ⅱ 모두가건강한사회를만들어가는시민건강증진연구소 People's Health Institute


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

590호(01-11)

Treatment and Role of Hormaonal Replaement Therapy

歯4차학술대회원고(황수경이상호).PDF

<31342EBCBAC7FDBFB52E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

달생산이 초산모 분만시간에 미치는 영향 Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 達 은 23) 의 丹 溪 에 최초로 기 재된 처방으로, 에 복용하면 한 다하여 난산의 예방과 및, 등에 널리 활용되어 왔다. 達 은 이 毒 하고 는 甘 苦 하여 氣, 氣 寬,, 結 의 효능이 있

03-서연옥.hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

노인정신의학회보14-1호

이용석 박환용 - 베이비부머의 특성에 따른 주택유형 선택 변화 연구.hwp

<BFACBCBCC0C7BBE7C7D E687770>

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

YI Ggodme : The Lives and Diseases of Females during the Latter Half of the Joseon Dynasty as Reconstructed with Cases in Yeoksi Manpil (Stray Notes w

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

부속

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

07ÀÓ½ÂÁö50-61

사회동향1-최종

Life Course

<B3EDB9AEC1FD5F3235C1FD2E687770>

歯1.PDF

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

44-3대지.08류주현c

A 617

서론

歯14.양돈규.hwp

< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

사회동향-내지간지수정

141(26) () ( ( ) () () () ) 2) 1932 ()()3) 2 1) ( ) ( ) () () () 4) ( ) 5) 6) ) ) ( ) () 42 () )

아태연구(송석원) hwp

44-4대지.07이영희532~

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Á¶´öÈñ_0304_final.hwp

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

13.12 ①초점

hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

2011´ëÇпø2µµ 24p_0628

12이문규

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 1~29 정책 용도별특성을고려한도시가스수요함수의 추정 :, ARDL,,, C4, Q4-1 -

139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

한국 출산력의 저하 요인에 관한 연구

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

<C7D1B1B9B1A4B0EDC8ABBAB8C7D0BAB85F31302D31C8A35F32C2F75F E687770>

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

04_이근원_21~27.hwp

한국체육학회지.hwp

Rheu-suppl hwp

03-배화옥

<3036C0CCBCB1BFEC2E687770>

07½Å¿µÀü

.,,, - 4, 5.,.,..,.. / /, LG OLED,,.,,.. / /,.,.,...,...

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 35~55 학술 전력시장가격에대한역사적요인분해 * 35

Transcription:

Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health March 2010, Vol. 43, No. 2, 138-150 doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.2.138 Analysis for the Impact of Adulthood and Childhood Socioeconomic Positions and Intergenerational Social Mobility on Adulthood Health Jae-Hee Seo 1, Ho Kim 2, Young-Jeon Shin 1 1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine; 2 School of Public Health, Seoul National University Objectives: There are at least three conceptual models for the effects of the childhood social environment on adult health: the critical period model, the social mobility model, and the cumulative risk model. However, few studies have investigated all three different models within the same setting. This study aims to examine the impact of childhood and adulthood socioeconomic positions and intergenerational social mobility over the life course on the health in adulthood based both on the critical period model and the social mobility model. Methods: This study was conducted on 9583 adults aged between 25 and 64 years old and they were the respondents to the Korea Welfare Panel Study (2006). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out, using the critical period model and the social mobility model out of the life course approaches, to look into the impact of childhood and adulthood socioeconomic positions and intergenerational social mobility on the health status in adulthood. Results: Household income and occupation out of the adulthood socioeconomic position indicators had an independent influence on the adulthood health status. The childhood socioeconomic position indicators, except for the place of childhood residence, affected the adulthood health status even after adjustment for the adulthood socioeconomic position. The effect of intergenerational social mobility was also statistically significant even after adjusting for the adulthood socioeconomic position, but it became insignificant when the childhood socioeconomic position was additionally adjusted for. Conclusions: Adulthood health is indeed affected by both the childhood and adulthood socioeconomic positions as well as intergenerational social mobility. This result shows that a life course approach needs to be adopted when dealing with health issues. Key words: Chronic disease, Health status, Social mobility, Socioeconomic factor J Prev Med Public Health 2010;43(2):138-150

Figure 1. Type of intergenerational social mobility. Note: Intergenerational social mobility was defined as upward, downward or stable comparing the childhood SEP with the subject s own occupation. Stable non-manual: non-manual population who had nonmanual father, Upward mobile: non-manual population who had manual father, Downward mobile: manual population who had non-manual father, Stable manual: manual population who had manual father. Figure 2. Conceptual framework for this study.

Table 1. Number and percentage of subjects self-reported health status and current chronic disease according to type of social mobility and socioeconomic position: adult aged 25-64 of Korean Welfare Panel Study, 2006 Social mobility and socioeconomic position indicators N Men (n=5039*) Self-reported health status Current chronic disease Healthy Average Unhealthy No Yes Social mobility Type of social mobility stable Upward mobile Downward mobile Manual stable Adulthood socioeconomic position Household income High Low Own occupation Manual Others Current residence Childhood socioeconomic position Own education level College or more High school Less than high school Father s education level High school or higher Elementary or middle No education Father s occupation Manual Others Residence at childhood 446 1072 311 2309 4289 750 1562 2667 810 2410 2629 2292 1949 798 2162 1865 1012 925 4014 101 1655 3385 401 (90.0) 908 (84.7) 258 (83.0) 1750 (75.8) 3466 (80.8) 429 (57.2) 1349 (86.3) 2041 (76.5) 506 (62.5) 1838 (76.3) 2057 (78.2) 1962 (85.6) 1503 (77.1) 431 (54.0) 1831 (84.7) 1437 (77.0) 627 (62.0) 802 (86.7) 3015 (75.1) 79 (78.5) 1364 (82.4) 2531 (74.8) 36 (8.1)0 114 (10.6) 33 (10.5) 310 (13.4) 501 (11.7) 92 (12.2) 154 (9.9)0 349 (13.1) 89 (11.0) 293 (12.1) 300 (11.4) 223 (9.7)0 246 (12.6) 124 (15.5) 193 (8.9)0 236 (12.7) 164 (16.2) 78 (8.5)0 503 (12.5) 12 (11.8) 163 (9.9)0 430 (12.7) 9 (1.9)0 50 (4.7)0 20 (6.6)0 249 (10.8) 322 (7.5)0 229 (30.6) 59 (3.8)0 277 (10.4) 214 (26.5) 279 (11.6) 272 (10.3) 107 (4.7)0 201 (10.3) 243 (30.5) 138 (6.4)0 192 (10.3) 221 (21.8) 45 (4.8)0 496 (12.4) 10 (9.8)0 127 (7.7)0 424 (12.5) 412 (92.5) 967 (90.2) 268 (86.3) 1938 (83.9) 3720 (86.7) 512 (68.2) 1418 (90.8) 2245 (84.2) 569 (70.3) 1998 (82.9) 2234 (85.0) 2084 (90.9) 1634 (83.8) 514 (64.4) 1970 (91.1) 1538 (82.5) 724 (71.5) 820 (88.7) 3327 (82.9) 85 (84.5) 1449 (87.6) 2783 (82.2) 34 (7.5)0 106 (9.8)0 43 (13.7) 371 (16.1) 569 (13.3) 238 (31.8) 144 (9.2)0 422 (15.8) 241 (29.7) 412 (17.1) 395 (15.0) 207 (9.1)0 315 (16.2) 284 (35.6) 192 (8.9)0 327 (17.5) 288 (28.5) 104 (11.3) 687 (17.1) 16 (15.5) 205 (12.4) 602 (17.8)

Table 1. [Continued] Number and percentage of subjects self-reported health status and current chronic disease according to type of social mobility and socioeconomic position: adult aged 25-64 of Korean Welfare Panel Study, 2006 Social mobility and socioeconomic position indicators N Women (n=5321*) Self-reported health status Current chronic disease Healthy Average Unhealthy No Yes Social mobility Type of social mobility stable Upward mobile Downward mobile Manual stable Adulthood socioeconomic position Household income High Low Own occupation Manual Others Current residence Childhood socioeconomic position Own education level College or more High school Less than high school Father s education level High school or higher Elementary or middle No education Father s occupation Manual Others Residence at childhood * Weighted total number. 294 644 206 1336 4377 943 962 1574 2785 2623 2698 1731 2156 1435 2474 1891 955 1076 4137 108 1710 3611 264 (89.7) 577 (89.6) 151 (73.2) 876 (65.6) 3348 (76.5) 446 (47.3) 864 (89.8) 1051 (66.7) 1879 (67.5) 1851 (70.6) 1943 (72.0) 1531 (88.5) 1651 (76.6) 611 (42.6) 2024 (81.8) 1301 (68.8) 469 (49.1) 849 (78.9) 2866 (69.3) 79 (72.8) 1338 (78.2) 2456 (68.0) 21 (7.2)0 45 (6.9)0 31 (15.2) 221 (16.5) 547 (12.5) 167 (17.7) 67 (7.0)0 258 (16.4) 390 (14.0) 362 (13.8) 353 (13.1) 139 (8.1)0 290 (13.5) 285 (19.8) 260 (10.5) 299 (15.8) 155 (16.3) 125 (11.7) 570 (13.8) 19 (17.6) 185 (10.8) 529 (14.7) 9 (3.1)0 22 (3.5)0 24 (11.6) 239 (17.9) 482 (11.0) 330 (35.0) 31 (3.3)0 266 (16.9) 515 (18.5) 410 (15.6) 402 (14.9) 60 (3.5)0 214 (9.9)0 538 (37.5) 191 (7.7)0 291 (15.4) 331 (34.6) 101 (9.4)0 701 (16.9) 10 (9.6)0 187 (10.9) 626 (17.3) 277 (94.0) 620 (96.3) 166 (80.9) 1026 (76.8) 3694 (84.4) 574 (60.9) 921 (95.7) 1220 (77.5) 2127 (76.4) 2098 (80.0) 2170 (80.4) 1644 (95.0) 1873 (86.9) 752 (52.4) 2218 (89.7) 1494 (79.0) 556 (58.2) 912 (84.8) 3265 (78.9) 91 (84.6) 1468 (85.9) 2801 (77.6) Weighted total number: men=4,318 women=2,480 (if own occupation or father s occupation was others then they were excluded). 18 (6.0)0 24 (3.7)0 39 (19.1) 310 (23.2) 683 (15.6) 369 (39.1) 41 (4.3)0 354 (22.5) 657 (23.6) 524 (20.0) 528 (19.6) 87 (5.0)0 283 (13.1) 683 (47.6) 256 (10.3) 397 (21.0) 399 (41.8) 164 (15.2) 872 (21.1) 17 (15.4) 242 (14.1) 811 (22.4)

Table 2. Changes in odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of self-reported health for adulthood socioeconomic position (SEP) indicators with adjustment for childhood SEP indicators: adults aged 25-64 of Korea Welfare Panel Study, 2006 Adulthood SEP Household income High Low Own occupation Manual Others Current residence 2.20 (1.83-2.64) 1.39 (1.16-1.66) 2.29 (1.82-2.88) 0.93 (0.80-1.07) * Father s occupation, father s education level. Father s SEP and own education level were adjusted. Men Age, father s SEP*adjusted 2.16 (1.79-2.60) 1.28 (1.07-1.54) 2.22 (1.76-2.80) 0.90 (0.78-1.04) Fully adjusted 2.03 (1.68-2.45) 1.10 (0.90-1.35) 2.00 (1.57-2.54) 0.89 (0.77-1.02) 2.61 (2.22-3.08) 1.47 (1.14-1.90) 1.76 (1.38-2.23) 0.98 (0.85-1.12) Women Age, father s SEP*adjusted 2.57 (2.18-3.03) 1.34 (1.03-1.73) 1.66 (1.31-2.12) 0.96 (0.84-1.10) Fully adjusted 2.40 (2.03-2.84) 1.02 (0.78-1.34) 1.40 (1.09-1.80) 0.94 (0.82-1.08) Table 3. Changes in odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of current chronic disease for adulthood socioeconomic position (SEP) indicators with adjustment for childhood SEP indicators: adults aged 25-64 of Korea Welfare Panel Study, 2006 Adulthood SEP Household income High Low Own occupation Manual Others Current residence 2.02 (1.64-2.50) 1.16 (0.93-1.44) 2.11 (1.61-2.76) 0.90 (0.76-1.07) * Father s occupation, father s education level. Father s SEP and own education level were adjusted. Men Age, father s SEP*adjusted 2.00 (1.62-2.47) 01.1 (0.88-1.37) 2.03 (1.55-2.67) 0.88 (0.75-1.05) Fully adjusted 1.95 (1.57-2.41) 0.96 (0.75-1.22) 1.84 (1.38-2.45) 0.87 (0.74-1.03) 2.25 (1.87-2.71) 1.56 (1.09-2.24) 2.03 (1.43-2.88) 1.08 (0.92-1.27) Women Age, father s SEP*adjusted 2.22 (1.85-2.68) 1.44 ( - 2.08) 1.96 (1.38-2.78) 1.06 (0.91-1.25) Fully adjusted 2.06 (1.71-2.48) 0.99 (0.67-1.45) 1.50 (1.04-2.17) 1.04 (0.88-1.22)

Table 4. Changes in odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of self-reported health for childhood socioeconomic position (SEP) indicators with adjustment for adulthood SEP indicators: adults aged 25-64 of Korea Welfare Panel Study, 2006 Childhood SEP Own education College or more High school Less than high school Father s education level High school or higher Less than middle school Father s occupation Manual and others Residence at childhood 1.33(1.13-1.58) 2.12(1.71-2.63) 0.95(0.80-1.14) 1.61(1.28-2.03) 1.01(0.85-1.19) * Age, own occupation, household income were adjusted. Men Age and own occupation adjusted 1.26(1.05-1.52) 1.91(1.50-2.42) 0.95(0.79-1.13) 1.66(1.32-2.09) 1.06(0.90-1.25) Fully adjusted* 1.21(-1.47) 1.67(1.31-2.13) 0.94(0.78-1.13) 1.64(1.30-2.07) 1.10(0.93-1.30) 1.62(1.34-1.97) 2.98(2.34-3.80) 1.12(0.94-1.32) 1.05(0.86-1.28) 0.93(0.79-1.09) Women Age and own occupation adjusted 1.56(1.27-1.92) 2.96(2.30-3.82) 1.14(0.96-1.35) 1.04(0.85-1.27) 0.93(0.79-1.09) Fully adjusted* 1.53(1.24-1.88) 2.61(2.02-3.38) 1.13(0.95-1.34) 1.03(0.84-1.26) 0.95(0.81-1.12) Table 5. Changes in odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of current chronic disease for childhood socioeconomic position (SEP) indicators with adjustment for adulthood SEP indicators: adults aged 25-64 of Korea Welfare Panel Study, 2006 Childhood SEP Own education College or more High school Less than high school Father s education level High school or higher Less than middle school Father s occupation Manual and others Residence at childhood 1.36(1.10-1.67) 1.63(1.27-2.09) 1.22(0.97-0.52) 1.03(0.79-1.35) 0.86(0.70-1.05) * Age, own occupation, household income were adjusted. Men Age and own occupation adjusted 1.33(1.06-1.68) 1.55(1.18-2.04) 01.2(0.96-1.51) 1.07(0.82-1.40) 0.90(0.73-1.10) Fully adjusted* 1.30(1.03-1.63) 1.37(1.03-1.81) 1.20(0.96-1.51) 1.05(0.80-1.38) 0.93(0.76-1.14) 1.85(1.40-2.43) 3.67(2.69-5.00) 1.25(1.01-1.55) 0.75(0.58-0.96) 0.81(0.67-0.99) Women Age and own occupation adjusted 1.80(1.35-2.40) 3.76(2.71-5.22) 1.28(1.03-1.59) 0.74(0.57-0.95) 0.81(0.67-0.99) Fully adjusted* 1.79(1.34-2.39) 3.42(2.46-4.75) 1.28(1.03-1.59) 0.73(0.57-0.94) 0.83(0.68-1.01)

Table 6. Changes in odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of self-reported health status and current chronic disease for intergenerational social mobility with adjustment for childhood SEP (own education) and adulthood SEP (household income): adults aged 25-64 of Korea Welfare Panel Study, 2006 Intergenerational social mobility* Men Stable non-manual Upward mobile Downward mobile Stable manual Women Stable non-manual Upward mobile Downward mobile Stable manual 2.17(1.04-4.53) 2.68(1.18-6.08) 4.13(2.07-8.25) 1.76(0.79-3.92) 2.63(1.18-5.88) 3.06(1.53-6.10) Self-reported health status Age and own education adjusted 2.07(0.99-4.32) 2.20(0.96-5.06) 2.84(1.37-5.87) 1.32(0.59-2.97) 1.28(0.54-3.02) 1.17(0.54-2.55) Age and household income adjusted 2.21(1.06-4.60) 2.31(1.01-5.27) 3.58(1.79-7.17) 1.62(0.73-3.60) 2.08(0.93-4.68) 2.36(1.18-4.74) 1.11(0.73-1.70) 1.35(0.81-2.24) 1.37(0.93-2.03) 1.12(0.57-2.20) 2.26(1.19-4.28) 1.73(1.01-2.96) Current chronic diseases Age and own education adjusted 1.07(0.70-1.64) 1.22(0.73-2.06) 1.19(0.77-1.82) 0.90(0.46-1.78) 1.31(0.65-2.63) 0.80(0.43-1.51) Age and household income adjusted 1.12(0.73-1.71) 1.27(0.76-2.11) 1.29(0.87-1.90) 1.06(0.54-2.08) 1.91(-3.63) 1.43(0.83-2.45) * Intergenerational social mobility was defined as upward, downward or stable comparing the childhood SEP (socioeconomic position) with the subjects own occupation; Stable non-manual: non-manual population who had non-manual father; Upward mobile: non-manual population who had manual father; Downward mobile: manual population who had non-manual father; Stable manual: manual population who had manual father.

1. Khang YH, Lynch JW, Kaplan GA. Health inequalities in Korea: Age- and sex-specific educational differences in the 10 leading causes of death. Int J Epidemiol 2004; 33(2): 299-308. 2. Khang YH, Kim HR. Explaining socioeconomic inequality in mortality among South Koreans: An examination of multiple pathways in a nationally representative longitudinal study. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34(3): 630-637. 3. Khang YH, Lynch JW, Kaplan GA. Impact of economic crisis on cause-specific mortality in South Korea. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34(6): 1291-1301. 4. Kim HR, Khang YH, Yoon KJ, Kim CS. Socioeconomic Health Inequalties and Counter Policies in Korea, Seoul.

Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs 2004. (Korean) 5. Khang YH. Lifecourse approaches to socioeconomic health inequalities. J Prev Med Public Health 2005; 38(3): 267-275. (Koean) 6. Kaplan GA, Lynch JW. Whither studies on the socioeconomic foundations of population health? Am J Public Health 1997; 87(9): 1409-1411. 7. Korea Labor Institute. 8th Korea labor & income panel study. [cited 2009 Dec 20]. Available from http://www.kli. re.kr/30_labp_eng/index.asp. 8. Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lynch J, Hallqvist J, Power C. Life course epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57(10): 778-783. 9. Leon DA, Walt G, editors. Poverty, Inequality and Health: An International Perspective. Persoective. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001, p 58-87. 10. Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y, editors. A life Course Approach to Chronic Disease Epidemiology, 2nd ed. Persoective. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004, p 3-14. 11. Lynch J, Kaplan GA. Socioeconomic position. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I (eds). Social Epidemiology. Oxford University Press: New York, 2000, p 13-35. 12. Rosvall M, Chaix B, Lynch J, Lindstrom M, Merlo J. Similar support for three different life course socioeconomic models on predicting premature cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality. BMC Public Health 2006; 6: 203. 13. Hallqvist J, Lynch J, Bartley M, Lang T, Blane D. Can we disentangle life course processes of accumulation, critical period and social mobility? An analysis of disadvantaged socio-economic positions and myocardial infarction in the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58(8): 1555-1562. 14. Pollitt RA, Rose KM, Kaufman JS. Evaluating the evidence for models of life course socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2005; 5: 7. 15. Barker DJ, Osmond C. Infant mortality, childhood nutrition, and ischaemic heart disease in England and Wales. Lancet 1986; 1(8489): 1077-1081. 16. Singh-Manoux A, Ferrie JE, Chandola T, Marmot M. Socioeconomic trajectories across the life course and health outcomes in midlife: Evidence for the accumulation hypothesis? Int J Epidemiol 2004; 33(5): 1072-1079. 17. Power C, Matthews S, Manor O. Inequalities in self rated health in the 1958 birth cohort: Lifetime social circumstances or social mobility? BMJ 1996; 313(7055): 449-453. 18. Hemmingsson T, Lundberg I. Can large relative mortality differences between socio-economic groups among Swedish men be explained by risk indicator-associated social mobility? Eur J Public Health 2005; 15(5): 518-522. 19. Krieger N, Chen JT, Selby JV. Class inequalities in women s health: Combined impact of childhood and adult social class--a study of 630 US women. Public Health 2001; 115(3): 175-185. 20. Tiikkaja S, Hemstrom O. Does intergenerational social mobility among men affect cardiovascular mortality? A population-based register study from Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2008; 36(6): 619-628. 21. Tiikkaja S, Hemstrom O, Vagero D. Intergenerational class mobility and cardiovascular mortality among Swedish women: A population-based register study. Soc Sci Med 2009; 68(4): 733-739. 22. Beebe-Dimmer J, Lynch JW, Turrell G, Lustgarten S, Raghunathan T, Kaplan GA. Childhood and adult socioeconomic conditions and 31-year mortality risk in women. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159(5): 481-490. 23. Khang YH. Relationship between childhood socioeconomic position and mortality risk in adult males of the Korea Labour and Income Panel Study (KLIPS). Public Health 2006; 120(8): 724-731. 24. Kim JM, Stewart R, Shin IS, Yoon JS. Limb length and dementia in an older Korean population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74(4): 427-432. 25. Song YM, Sung J. Adult height and the risk of mortality in South Korean women. Am J Epidemiol 2008; 168(5): 497-505. 26. Rose KM, Perhac JS, Bang H, Heiss G. Historical records as a source of information for childhood socioeconomic status: Results from a pilot study of decedents. Ann Epidemiol 2008; 18(5): 357-363. 27. Davey Smith G, Hart C, Hole D, MacKinnon P, Gillis C, Watt G et al. Education and occupational social class: Which is the more important indicator of mortality risk? J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52(3): 153-160. 28. Kaplan GA, Goldberg DE, Everson SA, Cohen RD, Salonen R, Tuomilehto J et al. Perceived health status and morbidity and mortality: Evidence from the Kuopio ischaemic heart disease risk factor study. Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25(2): 259-265. 29. Kim HR. The relationship of socioeconomic position and health behaviors with morbidity in Seoul, Korea. Health Soc Welf Rev 2005; 25(2): 3-35. (Korean) 30. Son MA. The relationship of social class and health behaviors with morbidity in Korea. Korean J Prev Med 2002; 35(1): 57-64. (Korean) 31. Lee MS. Health inequalities among Korean adultssocioeconomic status and residential area differences. Korean J Sociol 2005; 39(6): 183-209. (Korean) 32. Korean Institute of Health and Social Affair. The Third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(KNHANES III). Seoul, Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2005. 33. Kim YM, Kim MH. Health inequalities in Korea: Current conditions and implications. J Prev Med Public Health 2007; 40(6): 431-438. (Korean) 34. Jeon GS, Jang SN, Rhee SJ. The impact of socioeconomic factors on the gender differences of disability and subjective health among elderly Koreans. J Prev Med

Public Health 2009; 42(3): 199-207. 35. Korea Labor Institute. 8th Korea labor & income panel study. [cited 2009 Dec 20]. Available from http://www.kli. re.kr/klips/ko/report/vew.klips-0600?pageno=&seq= 8#file. 36. Smith GD, Hart C, Blane D, Hole D. Adverse socioeconomic conditions in childhood and cause specific adult mortality: Prospective observational study. BMJ 1998; 316(7145): 1631-1635. 37. Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O, Martikainen P, Lahelma E. Socioeconomic position and self-rated health: The contribution of childhood socioeconomic circumstances, adult socioeconomic status, and material resources. Am J Public Health 2005; 95(8): 1403-1409. 38. Chang SS. Inequality of educational opportunity in Korea: The effects of family background on educational attainment. Korean J Sociol 2000; 34: 671-708, 798-799 (Korean) 39. Son M, Armstrong B, Choi JM, Yoon TY. Relation of occupational class and education with mortality in Korea. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56(10): 798-799. 40. Krieger N, Okamoto A, Selby JV. Adult female twins recall of childhood social class and father s education: A validation study for public health research. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147(7): 704-708.