전체.hwp - PDF Free Download

[ 미국 ] 미등록저작물을부당하게차별한저작권 화해계약은무효 1) * 출판업체들이신문, 잡지등의인쇄물을통해출판할목적으로프리랜서작가들로부터라이선스를받은저작물을작가의허락없이자사의온라인데이터베이스를통해재발행한사건에서, 항소법원은출판업체들과프리랜서작가들이체결한화해계약은방식주의를감안하더라도미등록저작물작가의이익을공평하게보호하지못하므로무효라고판결함. 사건 1) 의배경 1990 WestLaw, NexisLexis. 1999 National Writers Union, The Authors Guild, Inc., American Society of Journalists and Authors The New York Times Co., Thomson Reuters Corp. WestLaw. 2001. 6. 25. New York Times Co. v. Tasini( Tasini ) 2) * University of British Columbia Law School, J.D. 1) In re Literary Works in Electronic Databases Copyright Litigation(REED ELSEVIER, INC. v. MUCHNICK.), 2011 US App Lexis 17026 (Aug 17, 2011). 2) New York Times Co. v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483 (2001). 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 1

. Tasini National Writers Union 2002. 1. Tasini (mediation), 3 2005. 3.. 출판업체들과프리랜서작가들이체결한화해계약의내용 A, B, C 3. - A: 3) 412 4) (statutory damages) - B:, A, (actual damages) - C: 411 (a) 99%. A, 15 1,500, 15 1,200, 875, B 150 12.5%, C 5 10%. 3) 4) 412. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 2

1,800, C reduction, A, B, C 1,800 C, A B C 0.,. 각급법원의판결 1 2005. 9. 21 10, A, B, C,,. 2005. 10. 10 2. 2,. 411 (a) 5),.. 2010. 3. 2. 411 (a) (claim processing rules),.. 5) 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 3

제2항소법원의판단 C (99% ) 6), 23 (a) 7) (adequacy of representation), 1.,. 시사점 2005,, 2005. 2005 2005,. 6), 1,800, A, B C. 7) 23 (a) 4, 1) (numerosity), 2) (commonality), 3) (typicality), 4) (adequacy of representation)., A, B C. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 4

참고자료 http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/18/business/media/court-says-publishe rs-settlement-was-unfair-to-writers.html?_r=1 http://www2.americanbar.org/scfji/lists/new%20case%20summaries/dis pform.aspx?id=558 http://www.copyrightclassaction.com/ http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/copyright/article/4 8493-with-the-freelance-settlement-rejected-what-s-next-.html http://itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/reed_elsevier_v._muchnick 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 5

[ 미국 ] YouTube 의침해통지시스템, 이대로좋은가 8) * ilcreative라는아이디를사용하는 YouTube 이용자의허위저작권침해주장으로순식간에미국유명팝스타들의공식뮤직비디오들이 YouTube 사이트에서대거삭제되자, 특별한증거자료의제출없이도기계적으로적용되는 YouTube의침해통지시스템의문제점과악용가능성에관한우려가제기되고있음. 사건의배경 2011. 8. 29. Justin Bieber Bieber YouTube. Justin Bieber Lady Gaga, Beyonce, Rihanna YouTube. 그림 1. YouTube 의저작권침해통지신고화면 * University of British Columbia Law School, J.D. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 6

Bieber ilcreative YouTube. ilcreative, YouTube, Bieber, YouTube YouTube. YouTube의저작권침해문제에대한처리방침 YouTube 3. - (Terms of Service Violation):, YouTube YouTube. - ID : YouTube (Content ID tool), (audio and video fingerprints database) YouTube,. - (Takedown Notice) : 1998 512 (c) YouTube 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 7

(safe harbor). (notice and takedown),. ilcreative YouTube, ilcreative Justin Bieber. YouTube의침해통지방침, 이대로괜찮은가? YouTube ilcreative. YouTube,. 참고자료 http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/justin-bieber-youtube-site-resto red-228918 http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2392061,00.asp http://www.eff.org/issues/intellectual-property/guide-to-youtube-removal s http://www.youtube.com/t/dmca_policy 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 8

[ 독일 ] 컴퓨터와프린터제조업체도사적복제보상 의무를지는가 1) * 2008년개정전저작권법상사적복제보상의무를지는복제기기에스캐너외에컴퓨터와프린터도포함되는지여부에대해독일연방대법원과연방헌법재판소가서로다른취지의판단을함으로써논란이가중되고있음. 배경 1) 54 54a,, 1985. 2) 2001. 7. 5., - -. 3) * 1) 2008. 1. 1.. 2) 1999 (28.01.1999 - I ZR 208/96). 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 9

- 54. 2002 HP, Canon,,. 2008. 1. 1. 54 54 54a. 2007 12 31. 연방대법원의 1차판결 2007. 12. 6. 2001,. 4) 2008. 2. 10. 5) 2008. 5. 8. CD-copystation 6). 2008. 1. 30.. 7) 3) 05.07.2001 - I ZR 335/98. 4) 6. 12. 2007 - I ZR 94/05. 5) 02.10.2008 - I ZR 18/06. 6) 17.07.2008 - I ZR 206/05. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 10

. 연방헌법재판소결정 2010. 8. 30. 2010. 12. 21.,. 8) - 54a 2001/29/EG 5 2 a 9). CD CD-copystation CD. 10) 연방대법원의 2차판결 2011. 7. 21. 1 7) 30.01.2008 - I ZR 131/05. 8) 30.8.2010-1 BvR 1631/08, 21.12.2010-1 BVR 506/09. 9). 10) 21.12.2010-1 BvR 3461/08. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 11

. 11) -. - 1) 2) 20. -. 평가 12) 2. 11) 21.7.2011 - I ZR 28, 29, 30/11 und 162/10. 12) Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, TeleKOMmunikation und neue Medien (BITKOM). 1999 1,350,, IT. ( ) 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 12

2009. 1. 2008. 참고자료 http://www.bitkom.org/de/presse/8477_68726.aspx http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/bitkom-warnt-vor-deutschem-s onderweg-bei-urheberrechtsabgaben-160572.html http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/bundesgerichtshof-keine-urheb erpauschale-auf-drucker-167868.html http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/vg-wort-geht-fuer-drucker-ur heberpauschale-vors-bundesverfassungsgericht-180640.html http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/bundesverfassungsgericht-entsc heidet-zugunsten-vg-wort-1170137.html http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/urheberverguetung-fuer-pcs-u nd-drucker-bleibt-weiter-offen-1224166.html 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 13

[ 일본 ] 출판물복제에관한실태조사결과 13) * 일본출판협회가수행한 출판물복제에관한실태조사 결과, 2010 년 복사기를통한복사경험은 31.4%, 스캐너의이용경험은 27.3%, 전자책 의다운로드경험은 11.8% 로나타남. 배경 2011. 8. 26. ( 11 ),. - 2011. 4. 15. 4. 20. 18 3,876 1) 18 600 2),,. 2010 1 91.4%( 89.0%), 27.3%( 18.5%). 3) * 1) PC PC 2010. 2) PC PC 2010. 3). 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 14

복사기를이용한출판물복사. 49.8%, 21.3%. 56.1%, 33.3%. 54.3%. 47.9%, 20.2%,,,. 42.7%,,,,. 7.2. 4) 55.7%, 45.2% 26.3%, 12.5%. 62.2% 40.7%( 25.5%, 15.2%). 73.0%( 65.5%) 45.2%, 37.9%,,, 37.2%. 54.2% ( 41.0%),, 22.9%, 22.2%, 18.5%. 스캐너를이용한출판물복제. 45.0% 43.2%. 66.1%, 51.3%,, (,, ) 4) 1 1. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 15

5%. 82.0% 22.5%. 32.3% 26.2%, 25.4%, 22.5%, 21.1%. 34.2% 27.0%, 23.4%, 22.5%. 9.6. 76.7% 46.9%, 36.5%. 66.7%.. 31.6%,. 36.3%.. 58.6%,. 17.1%. 6.2%. 22.5% 5 1 55.9%. ( ) 24.2%, 22.7%, 19.7%, 18.2%. ( ),, 57.6%, 40.5%, 37.0%. 5.7%. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 16

전자서적의다운로드현황 2010 11.8%( 14.2%), 2010 2010 6.5%( 8.2%) 18.3%( 22.3%), 81.7%( 77.7%). 46.9% 30.6%, 27.3%,,, 13.1%. 77.6% 32.9%,,, 11.8%, 9.4%., 24.0%, 42.1%, 33.9%., 24.5%, 46.7%, 28.8%. 시사점,.,. 참고자료 http://www.bunka.go.jp/bunkashingikai/kondankaitou/denshishoseki/11/i ndex.html 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 17

[ 중국 ] 저작권법의전면개정논의 5) * 1990년에제정된중국저작권법은두번의일부개정이있었는데, 중국은과학기술과인터넷의발달, 세계화등으로인한변화에부응하기위하여저작권법의전면적인개정을추진하고있으며 2013년경에저작권법이개정될것으로예상됨. 배경 2011. 8. 25.. - 1990. 9. 7., WTO 2001. 12. 27. 1, WTO 2010. 2. 26. 2,.,,. -, 3. -,. 입법상황의변화, * 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 18

.,.. 20,., 3 3,. 저작권법개정의원칙,,,,. 3,,. 현황및향후일정 2011. 7. 13.. 23 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 19

, 30. 10, 3. 1 2012. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 20

[ 중국 ] 동영상사이트, 새수익모델에관심 1) * 최근동영상사이트의광고수입상승률이드라마등동영상저작권료 의상승률에크게못미치자새로운수익모델에관심을보이기시작함. 배경. 3,., 2010 181% 1 9. -,. 주요내용 ( ) COO. - 2 + VOD,,. 2004 * 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 21

. - PC, TV,,. - 5 ~ 7, 1 ~ 2,. 70 ~ 80%. PC, TV,, PC.,. 참고자료 http://www.chinaxwcb.com/2011-08/22/content_227030.htm 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 22

[ 태국 ] 지식재산권청, 2011 지식재산박람회 개최 1) * 태국지식재산권청은 9. 2. ~ 9. 4. 3 일간방콕중심가에위치한퀸시리 킷전시장에서 2011 지식재산박람회 (IP Fair 2011) 를개최하여, 지식재산 권을대중에게알리고지식재산관련자들을위한토론의장을제공함. 주요내용 2011. 9. 2. ~ 4. (Queen Sirikit National Convention Center), (Extending Wisdom, Creating Thai Innovation to the World) 2011 (IP Fair 2011). Bhumibol Adulyadej,,. 1), * 1) 11, Chaipattana Aerator.,,, 1000, (WIPO) 2009 (Global Leaders Award). 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 23

[ 호주 ] 호주영상협회, 영상콘텐츠의경제적효과발표 2) * 호주영상협회는영상콘텐츠의이용실태를조사하여보고서를발표함. 이보고서에의하면 2010년호주에서 73편의호주영화와 7편의해외영화가제작되었으며, 영상콘텐츠로인한수익이 61억달러이고불법복제로인한손실은 13억달러인것으로나타남. 배경 IPSOS Oxford Economics 1) 2011. 2. (Economic Consequenses of Movie Piracy in Australia) 2009. 7. 2010. 7. 1. - 13 7. 6,100, 1 6,300. 2) 5 7,500. 2011. 8. 23. TV (Economic Contribution of the Film and television Industry). * 1) The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft., TV. 2),,,. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 25

New South Wales, Victoria Queensland 2, 3.. 2006 ~ 2007 18, 2009 ~ 2010 19 5. 2006 ~ 2007 5.11%. -,. 표. 2006 ~ 2007년과 2009 ~ 2010년도의경제적공헌도 ( 백만달러 ) 경제공헌도 영업이익 노동임금 보조금 총이익 일자리 2006 ~ 2007 3,282 2,665 108 5,839 49,941명 2009 ~ 2010 3,455 2,793 111 6,137 28,667명 변화 5.29% 4.82% 3.17% 5.11% -2.55% 호주의영상콘텐츠산업의현황,,,,,, 8 5,200, 8 3,200. 2009 ~ 2010 73 7, 5 5,100 1 7. 3) - 2002 ~ 2003 3,900 2005 ~2006 4. 3 8. 3) 2006 ~ 2007 75 (4 9,800 ), 11 (1 3,400 ). 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 27

-. - 19. 2001. 40%. - 5 4.. 2010 TV 30.9%. - 2 6, 3 5. - 2006,. - 2005 ~ 2006, DVD. - 2006 ~ 2009,.,, TV 41 79%. - 2009. 12. 2010. 12.,,,. 2009. 12. 2010. 12., TV 1,200 2,700 4). - YouTube 530, Google Video Metacafe 5). - 2008, 2008 10 4) 14. 5) YouTube. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 28

2010 210, 2015 640. - 2010 2,390 2015 7,360. 평가. 61 48,000, 13 7 6,100. 22%, 12.7%.,. 참고자료 http://www.afact.org.au/index.php/news/film_and_tv_industry_contributes _6.1_billion_to_australian_economy http://www.afact.org.au/pressreleases/pdf/ipsos%20economic%20conse quences%20of%20movie%20piracy%20-%20australia.pdf 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 29

Irdeto, 안드로이드용으로 ActiveCloak 확장 6) * 멀티미디어콘텐츠보호업체인 Irdeto는자사의미디어보호솔루션인 ActiveCloak을안드로이드용버전으로확장하였다고발표함. ActiveCloak 은플랫폼독립적인소프트웨어방식이며, 이번확장버전에서는 HLS 스트리밍을지원함. ActiveCloak 의소개 Irdeto 1) 2011 2 ActiveCloak. ActiveCloak,,, PC, TV,,,,. Irdeto ActiveCloak D-Link 2) Boxee Box 3),,,,, Comcast OTT 4). * 1) CAS(Conditional Access System). CAS NDS. http://www.irdeto.com/ 2) 1986 2007 21.9%, 2008 WiFi 33%. 3) D-Link 2010 33. 4) Over-the-top content : 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 30

ActiveCloak 의개발배경 2011 1 9,400 ( 1 8, 1,400 ), 2015 6 5,300 ( 5 3,900, 1 1,300 ). 5) ActiveCloak HLS 6). 2010 TV 53%. 3D 100.,.. HLS. ActiveClock 의보안프레임워크 ActiveCloak,. ActiveCloak,,. - ActiveCloak. 5) http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1622614, http://www.bloter.net/archives/56696 6) HTTP Live Streaming: QuickTime X iphone HTTP. HTTP. 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 31

- ActiveCloak PC,. - ActiveCloak. 그림. ActiveCloak 보안프레임워크 ( 출처 : Irdeto) ActiveCloak 의확장솔루션 ActiveClock ios OS. (adaptive bitrate streaming) Irdeto IIS(Internet Information Service) Smooth HTTP Live Streaming(HLS). 시사점 ios 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 32

. ios,,, OS. HTC, OS.,. ios (jail breaking) (rooting),. DRM-free. 참고자료 http://www.irdeto.com/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/boxee_box http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/http_live_streaming Irdeto, Irdeto ActiveCloak Security Lifecycle Service, 2011 한국저작권위원회조사분석팀 33