- - - 130 -



Similar documents
Table 1. The variables of T.O.V.A. inattention impulsivity disinhibition variability inconsistency 200msec., 291

745_757특집-안동현

- 연구대상및방법 1. 연구대상 - 2. 연구방법 1) 검사도구의선정 2) 검사대상

상담학연구 ADHD- : ) 2) 3) 4) 5).,.,. MMPI, K-CBCL, KPR-C,. (Corresponding Author): / / 47 / Tel: /


Rheu-suppl hwp

1. 연구대상 연구방법 196

박 민 철 1. 공격성 aggression 4

ÀÇÇа�ÁÂc00Ì»óÀÏ˘

석사논문.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

Lumbar spine


노인정신의학회보14-1호

歯5-4-04(윤치연외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

012임수진

질병개념및진단분류 임상진단의난제점들 933

다문화 가정의 부모

<30382EC0C7C7D0B0ADC1C22E687770>


서론 34 2

< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>

YI Ggodme : The Lives and Diseases of Females during the Latter Half of the Joseon Dynasty as Reconstructed with Cases in Yeoksi Manpil (Stray Notes w


Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

12이문규

석사

歯1.PDF

04_이근원_21~27.hwp

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

,......

ePapyrus PDF Document

레이아웃 1

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

19 세미만인구의정신장애진단분포 치가 필요한 것으로 조사된 군은 명 인 것으로 발표되었다 년부터 년까지 국내 청소년 사망 원인 중 가장 많은 것이 자살이며 년 자살 충동에 대한 조사 결과 가 지난 년 동안 한 번이라도 자살하고 싶다는 생각을 해 본 적이 있다 고 응답하

Microsoft Word doc

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

03-ÀÌÁ¦Çö



hwp

<3034C0D3BBF3C3E1B0E8C7D0BCFABCBCB9CCB3AA2E687770>

Can032.hwp

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

교실, 놀이터, 혹은 유사 임상적 환경에서 실행한다. 대부분의 경우, 주의력과 충동 조 절에 대한 직접 검사(예:Continuous Performance Test)를 통해서는 실제 환경에서 수 집된 자료 이상의 정보를 얻기 힘들다. 유아들 간의 행동 다양성뿐 아니라 초

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

???? 1

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<30362E20C6EDC1FD2DB0EDBFB5B4EBB4D420BCF6C1A42E687770>

159

1..

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

untitled

16_이주용_155~163.hwp

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

A 617

<31372DB9DABAB4C8A32E687770>

44-4대지.07이영희532~

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

1

Pharmacotherapeutics Application of New Pathogenesis on the Drug Treatment of Diabetes Young Seol Kim, M.D. Department of Endocrinology Kyung Hee Univ

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

< 학술연구용역사업최종보고서 > 지역사회정신건강고위험군아동청소년추적관리코호트확대 (The follow-up and management system for children and adolescents at high-risk of mental health dwelling

(

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case

( ) ) ( )3) ( ) ( ) ( ) 4) 1915 ( ) ( ) ) 3) 4) 285

심장2.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

<626BBBE7B7CAB0FCB8AEC1F6C4A7BCAD30332E687770>

김범수

歯남민4.PDF

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

16(1)-3(국문)(p.40-45).fm

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다


???? 1

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

7.ƯÁýb71ÎÀ¯È« š

< FC1A4BAB8B9FDC7D D325FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

04김호걸(39~50)ok

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

°ø±â¾Ð±â±â

달생산이 초산모 분만시간에 미치는 영향 Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 達 은 23) 의 丹 溪 에 최초로 기 재된 처방으로, 에 복용하면 한 다하여 난산의 예방과 및, 등에 널리 활용되어 왔다. 達 은 이 毒 하고 는 甘 苦 하여 氣, 氣 寬,, 結 의 효능이 있

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Transcription:

KISEP Original Articles 13 1 2002 Korean J Child & Adol Psychiatr 13:129~138 ADHD 최적치료 지침을 위한 예비연구 * PRELIMINARY STUDY FOR ADHD TREATMENT GUIDELINE 이영식 ** 김은영 ** 나 철 ** Young-Sik Lee, M.D., ** Eun-Young Kim, M.D., ** Chul Ra, M.D. ** 목 적 방 법 결 과 결 론 중심 단어 서 론 Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Chung Ang University, Seoul Corresponding author - 129 -

- - - 130 -

연구대상 및 방법 1. 연구대상 2. 연구방법 1) 진단 검사도구 파악 2) 약물치료 현황파악 3) 비 약물치료 현황파악 Table 1. Present practise and the necessity of the diagnostic workup for ADHDn=32 Diagnostic workup Present practice - 131 - Necessity Routinely Selectively Not Routinely Selectively Not Conner s scale 45.2%14 32.3%10 22.6%07 66.7%20 26.7%08 06.7%02 CBCL 45.2%14 25.8%08 29.0%09 46.7%14 43.3%13 10.0%03 SCT 51.6%16 45.2%14 03.2%01 56.7%17 36.7%11 06.7%02 Intelligence test 58.1%18 41.9%13 000 %00 80.0%24 16.7%05 03.3%01 Projective test 22.6%07 74.2%23 03.2%01 23.3%07 70.0%21 06.7%02 ADS 30.0%09 06.7%02 63.3%19 50.0%14 35.7%10 14.3%04 TOVA 16.1%05 16.1%05 67.7%21 43.3%13 33.3%10 23.3%07 CPT 03.3%01 16.7%05 80.0%24 26.7%08 46.7%14 26.7%08 WCST 06.5%02 25.8%08 67.7%21 13.3%04 53.3%16 33.3%10 Stroop test 03.2%01 19.4%06 77.4%24 10.0%03 50.0%15 40.0%12 Trail making test 06.7%02 16.7%05 76.7%23 10.3%03 51.7%15 37.9%11 MRI/CT 000 %00 83.9%26 16.1%05 000 %00 86.7%26 13.3%04 SPECT 000 %00 38.7%12 61.3%19 000 %00 63.3%19 36.7%11 EEGsimple 25.8%08 67.7%21 06.5%02 26.7%08 70.0%21 03.3%01 EEGspecific 03.2%01 61.3%19 35.5%11 06.7%02 83.3%25 10.0%03 ERP 000 %00 38.7%12 61.3%19 000 %00 56.7%17 43.3%13 CBC,U/A,LFT 40.0%12 43.3%13 16.7%05 48.3%14 44.8%13 06.9%02 ECG 41.9%13 48.4%15 09.7%03 43.3%13 56.7%17 000 %00 TFT 12.9%04 67.7%21 19.4%06 20.0%06 76.7%23 03.3%01 Pb level 03.2%01 35.5%11 61.3%19 10.0%03 73.3%22 16.7%05 Chromosome test 000 %00 41.9%13 58.1%18 03.3%01 76.7%23 20.0%06 CBCLChild Behavior Checklist, SCTSentence Completion Test, ADSADHD Diagnostic System, TOVATest of Variables of Attention, CPTContinuous Performance Test, WCSTWisconsin Card Sorting Test, TFTThyroid Function Test

Table 2. Main trend of clinician s prescription for ADHD n=32 Drug classification Psychostimulant Antidepressant Mood stabilizer53.1% Antipsychotics71.9% Others Percentage of prescription metylphenidate100%, pemoline65.6% imipramine90.6%, fluoxetine65.6%, sertraline31.3%,moclobemide31.3%, nortriptyline25.0%, velafaxine12.5% Valproate43.8%, carbamazepine40.6%, lithium9.4% haloperidol65.6%, pimozide31.3%, risperidone21.9% Clonidine84.4% 3. 자료분석 연 구 결 과 1. 진단도구 및 의학적 검사 - - 2. 약물치료 실시현황 1) 전반적 약물사용 경험 - - 2) 공존질병이 없는 ADHD의 경우 3) 감정장애가 동반된 ADHD의 경우 4) 틱 장애가 동반된 ADHD의 경우 - 132 -

Table 3. Clinician s drug choice in variable situationsn=32 Without co-morbidity With emotional disorders With Tic disorder Situations 1st choice 2nd choice With aggression, conduct disorder MPH100% MPH43.8% AD34.4% MPHAD21.9% Stimulant25.0% Clonidine21.9% Antipsychotics21.9% Imipramine9.4% StimulantAntipsychotics6.3% ClonidineAntipsychotics6.3% MPH65.6% MPHAntipsychotics12.5% MPHMood stabilizer6.3% MPHAntidepressants6.3% Others9.4% Pemoline53.1% Imipramine34.4% SSRI6.3% Clonidine6.3%) Risperidone3.1% 1st2nd process MPHAD41.9% MPHMPH41.9% no choice of MPH16.1% MPH MPHAP/MS/AD/clonidine45.2% MPHNonstimulants19.4% MPHothersMPHothers 19.4% No choice of MPH in 1st, 2nd choice process9.4% Adolescent nonspecific50.0% SSRI34.4% Pemoline9.4% AD9.4% MS6.3% Clonodine6.3% Clomopramine, Clonazepam3.1% MPHMethylphenidate, APAntipsychotics, ADAntidepressant, SSRISelective Serotonine Reuptake Inhibitor MSMood Stabilizer - 5) 파탄적행동장애가 동반된 ADHD의 경우 6) 청소년 ADHD의 경우 - 133 -

Table 4. Clinician s present practise and opinion of necessity about the non-pharmacological treatment modalitiesn=32 Treatment modality Present practise Necessity Yes No Yes No Individual psychotherapy/play therapy 75.0%24 25.0%08 31.3%10 68.8%22 Individual CBT 65.6%21 34.4%11 56.3%18 43.8%14 Individual parents counselling 96.9%31 03.1%01 90.6%29 09.4%03 Child group therapy 37.5%12 62.5%20 29.0%09 71.0%22 Parents group therapy 43.8%14 56.3%18 61.3%19 38.7%12 CBTcognitive-behavioral therapy 3. 기타 치료의 실시현황 및 실시 필요성 고 찰 - 1. 진단적 접근에 관하여 - 134 -

Stage 1 Stage 2 *Non-medication *Treatment alternatives * monotherapy MPH100% partial response or nonresponse * Pemoline53.1% * Imipramine34.4% * SSRI6.3% * Clonidine6.3% * Risperidone3.1% * MPHAD41.9% * MPH43.8% *AD IMP8SSRI334.4% * MPH+AD 21.9% * MPHMPH41.9% * no MPHno MPH16.1% Stage 0 *Nonstimulants66% * Stimulants25% *StimulantsTic Medication9.4% *1, 2 stimulants 19.4% *1, 2 stimulants 38.7% *1 2 stimulants 61.3% * MPH65.6% * MPHAP12.5% * MPHMS6.3% * MPHAD6.3% * others 9.4% *MPHMPHAP/MS/AD/clonidine45.2% *MPHNonstimulants19.4% *MPHothersMPHothers 19.4% * 15.6% *1, 2 MPH 62.5% *1 MPH 25.8% *1, 2 MPH 9.4% * No difference50% * SSRI34.4% * Pemoline9.4% * AD9.4% * anticonvulsants6.3% * clonidine6.3% without cormorbid disorders with emotional disorders with Tic disorders with aggression adolescents Fig. 1. Algorithm for the medication treatments of ADHD without/with cormorbid psychiatric disorders in this study. 135

- - - - - - 3. 약물치료 이외의 치료에 관하여 - 136 -

References 1) 대한신경정신의학회(1998): 소아기 행동장애, 신 경정신과학. 하나의학사, pp573 2) Anderson JC, William S, McGee R, Silva PA(1987): DSM-III disordrs in preadolescent children:prevalence in a large sample from the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 24:211-220 3) 조수철, 신윤오(1994):파탄적 행동장애의 유병율 에 대한 연구. 소아청소년정신 의학 5:141-149 4) Popper CW, Steingard RJ(1994):Disorders usually first diagnosed in infancy, childhood, or adolescence. Textbook of psychiatry, ed by Hales RE, Yudofsky SC, Talbott JA, Washington DC, American Psychiatric Press, pp729-832 5) Arnold LE, Jensen PS(1995):Attention-deficit disorders, Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, 6th ed, ed by Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ, Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, pp2295-2310 6) 홍강의, 김종흔, 신민섭, 안동현(1996):주의산만, 과잉운동을 주소로 소아정신과 를 방문한 아동의 진단적 분류와 평가. 소아청소년 정신의학 7: 190-202 7) Sleator EK, Ullman RK(1981):Can the Physician Diagnose Hyperactivity in the Office?. Pediatrics 67: 13-17 8) Charles Popper, Scott A West(1999):Disorders Usually First Diagnosed in Infancy, Childhood, or Adolescence. In Textbook of Psychiatry, 3rd ed. American Psychiatric Press, Washington DC, London, p834 9) Charles Popper, Scott A West(1999):Disorders Usually First Diagnosed in Infancy, Childhood, or Adolescence. In Textbook of Psychiatry, 3rd ed. American Psychiatric Press, Washington DC, London, p835 10) 오경자(1990):주의력 결핍 과잉 활동 장애의 평 가. 소아청소년정신의학 1:65-76 11) Taylor(1995):Dysfunctions of Attention. Developmental Psychopathology vol. 2 : Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation, ed by Cicchetti D & Cihen DJ, New York, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, pp243-273 12) 조수철(1999):소아정신질환의 개념. 서울대학교 출판부:156-157 13) 안동현, 홍강의(1990) : 주의력 결핍장애 아동의 치료. 소아청소년정신의학 1:77-88 14) Costello EJ, Edelbrock C, Costello AJ, Dulcan MK, Barne BJ, Brent D(1988):Psychopathology in Pediatric primary care -New Hidden Morbidity. Pediatrics 81:415-424 15) John H(2000):National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement : Diagnosis and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). J AM Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39: 182-193 16) Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ(1998):Attention-Deficit Disorders.:Treatment. Synopsis of Psychiatry. 8th ed., Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, pp1198-137 -

17) Larry S. Goldman, Myron Genel, Rebecca J. Bezman, Priscilla J. Slanetz(1998):Diagnosis and Treament of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Child and Adolescents. J Am Med Assoc 279:1100-1107 18) Gilbert DA, Altshuler KZ, Rago WV(1998):Texas Medication Algorithm Project:definitions, rationale, and methods to develop medication algorithms. J Clin Psychiatry 59:345-351 19) Steven RP, Lawrence LG, M. LC, Andrew S, Caryn C, C. KC, James TC, Ja mes MS, Carroll WH, Maria EL, Molly L, Marcia GT(2000):The Texas Children s Medication Algorithm Project:Report of the Texas Consensus Conference Panel on Medication Treatment of Childhood Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Part I. J AM Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39:908-919 20) 신민섭, 박수현(1997) : 주의력결핍/과잉운동장애 아동의 신경심리학적 평가. 소아청소년정신의학 8:217-231 21) 이혜련 오경자 홍강의(1998):한국어판 아동행동 조사표, 하나의학사 22) Dupey TR, Greenberg LM(1993):T.O.V.A. Manual. U. A.D., LA 23) Diamond LH(1996):Developing disease-specific drug treatment protocols. In : Manolakis PG. ed. APhA Guide to Drug Treatment Protocols:A Resource for Creating and Using Disease Specific Pathways. Washington, DC:American Pharmaceutical Association 6-1- 6-14 ABSTRACT Korean J Child & Adol Psychiatr 13:129~138, 2002 PRELIMINARY STUDY FOR ADHD TREATMENT GUIDELINE Young-Sik Lee, M.D., Eun-Young Kim, M.D., Chul Ra, M.D. Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Chung Ang University, Seoul Objectives:In order to treatment guideline of ADHD, present clinical practise of child psychiatrists and their opinion of optimal intervention were evaluated. Methods:Structured questionnaire items about diagnostic workup, drug choice of 5 different situations according to different co-morbid disorders, and non - pharmacological treatment were applied to 32 child psychiatrists working at university and general hospital. we compared the data with Texas Algorithm Project guideline. Results:(1) Intelligence Test, Sentence Completion Test, sustained attention test, and Conner's questionnaire were the basic routine test that must be performed. (2) Main trend of medication in this study was not different from TAP guideline. (3) In case of co-morbid tic disorder, first recommending drug is still psychostimulant in the TAP guideline. But in this study initial psychostimulant prescription was not main trend. (4) In case of MPH non-response co-morbid disruptive behavior disorder, MPH medication combined with other drug were more common than switching to other drug as suggested the TAP guidelines. (5) In non-pharmacological treatment, most child psychiatrists reported the importance of parent management. Conclusion:There were some difference in medication trend in this study compared with TAP guideline. Further study and conference are needed for experts consensus in Korea. KEY WORDS:Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder(ADHD) Treatment Guideline Texas Algorithm Project(TAP). - 138 -