광덕산 레이더 자료를 이용한 강원중북부 내륙지방의 강수특성 연구

Similar documents
02¿ÀÇö¹Ì(5~493s

<30392E31322E303320C1F6B1B8C1F6C1A420B9D720C1F6C7FCB5B5B8E920B0EDBDC E706466>

untitled

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Nov.; 26(11),

오토10. 8/9월호 내지8/5

목차 ⅰ ⅲ ⅳ Abstract v Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ i

< B3E2BFF8BAB828C8AFB0E629312E687770>

자연채무에대한재검토 1. 서론 2. 선행연구 9 Journal of Digital Convergence 214 May; 12(5): 89-99

09È«¼®¿µ 5~152s


인문사회과학기술융합학회

untitled

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Jun.; 27(6),

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Jun.; 27(6),

(Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern (Micro- Environment) Re

µðÇÃÇ¥Áö±¤°í´Ü¸é

09권오설_ok.hwp

2 247, Dec.07, 2007

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Dec.; 27(12),

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

31(3B)-07(7055).fm

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE. vol. 29, no. 6, Jun Rate). STAP(Space-Time Adaptive Processing)., -

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Jul.; 27(7),

<31325FB1E8B0E6BCBA2E687770>

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

歯49손욱.PDF

국립중앙도서관 출판시도서목록(CIP) 강원도 시군별 투입산출표 작성 연구 / 김진기, 박봉원 [ 공저]. -- 춘천 : 강원발전연구원 (Research Institute for Gangwon) p. ; cm. -- ( 연구보고 ; 14-25) 참고문헌 수록

<313920C0CCB1E2BFF82E687770>

내지무인화_

04김호걸(39~50)ok

당신이 꿈꾸던 채널, CONTENTS 채널파워 데이터로 살펴보는 Buying Point 특별분석 : 빅데이터로 분석한 당신이 몰랐던 당신이 꿈꾸던 채널, - 채널파워 - 데이터로 살펴보는 Buying Point - 특별분석 : 빅데이터로 분석한 당신이 몰랐던 02 06

09이훈열ok(163-

, Analyst, , Figure 1 통신사가입자추이 ( 명, 000) 60,000 LG U+ KT SKT 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 자료 : MSIP. 미래에셋증권리서치센터


THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Feb.; 29(2), IS

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Mar.; 30(3),

02이용배(239~253)ok

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Jun; 26(6),

e01.PDF

슬라이드 1

11.indd

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE May; 27(5),

歯3일_.PDF


11 함범철.hwp

정치사적

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE. vol. 29, no. 10, Oct ,,. 0.5 %.., cm mm FR4 (ε r =4.4)

06장소영(f2.4)(115~122)ok

원위부요척골관절질환에서의초음파 유도하스테로이드주사치료의효과 - 후향적 1 년경과관찰연구 - 연세대학교대학원 의학과 남상현

<C5F0B0E8C7D0B0FA20C7D1B1B9B9AEC8AD20C1A63435C8A328C3D6C1BE292E687770>

책임연구기관

한약재품질표준화연구사업단 단삼 ( 丹參 ) Salviae Miltiorrhizae Radix 생약연구과

07 최운성.hwp

낙랑군

제1장 마을유래 605 촌, 천방, 큰동네, 건너각단과 같은 자연부락을 합하여 마을명을 북송리(北松里)라 하 였다. 2006년에 천연기념물 468호로 지정되었다. 큰마을 마을에 있던 이득강 군수와 지홍관 군수의 선정비는 1990년대 중반 영일민속박물 관으로 옮겼다. 건

Microsoft Word _0.doc

10(3)-09.fm

data driven_3.indd

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Dec.; 25(12),

,.. 2, , 3.. 본론 2-1 가상잡음신호원생성원리, [8].,. 1.,,. 4 km (13.3 μs).,. 2 (PN code: Pseudo Noise co- 그림 2. Fig. 2. Pseudo noise code. de). (LFSR: Line

Microsoft Word - retail_ doc

3542 KS Figure 1 원/엔 환율 추이 Figure 2 라인 2Q ~ 3Q15 매출 breakdown (KRW/JPY) (KRW bn) 3 25 Total: 229 Total: FX (+9%

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Feb.; 30(2),

<C6EDC1FD2DC0E7B3ADBBF3C8B2B0FCB8AE20C1A4BAB820C1A63130C8A320C8A3BFEC2E687770>

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

농어촌여름휴가페스티벌(1-112)

(JBE Vol. 21, No. 1, January 2016) (Regular Paper) 21 1, (JBE Vol. 21, No. 1, January 2016) ISSN 228


Æ÷Àå½Ã¼³94š


methods.hwp

2011´ëÇпø2µµ 24p_0628

년AQM보고서_Capss2Smoke-자체.hwp

Radar In Weather Modification

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Mar.; 26(3),

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE. vol. 26, no. 9, Sep GHz 10 W Doherty. [4]. Doherty. Doherty, C

融合先验信息到三维重建 组会报 告[2]

서론 34 2

보고서(겉표지).PDF


THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE. vol. 28, no. 4, Apr (planar resonator) (radiator) [2] [4].., (cond

*세지6문제(306~316)OK

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Aug.; 30(8),

한약재품질표준화연구사업단 작약 ( 芍藥 ) Paeoniae Radix 생약연구과

Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

1 (Page 3)

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

한약재품질표준화연구사업단 금은화 ( 金銀花 ) Lonicerae Flos 생약연구과

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Feb.; 28(2),

10(3)-12.fm

Microsoft Word - KSR2014S042

Microsoft Word _1

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE. vol. 27, no. 8, Aug [3]. ±90,.,,,, 5,,., 0.01, 0.016, 99 %... 선형간섭

untitled

¼º¿øÁø Ãâ·Â-1

韓國電磁波學會論文誌第 21 卷第 12 號 2010 年 12 月論文 On Reducing the Shadow Region for Extending the Service Area of TBN-Jeonju Broadcasting 김태훈 이문호 이미성

목 차

Microsoft Word - KSR2012A009.doc

KAERIAR hwp

Preliminary spec(K93,K62_Chip_081118).xls

Transcription:

Study on the characteristic of heavy rainfall in the middle northern Gangwon Province by using Gwangdeoksan radar data 2004. 12. 10.

Fig. 2.2.1 Measurement range of Gwangdeoksan radar site Fig. 2.2.2 Location of the radar site in three dimensional topographical data of Gwangdeoksan.

7.0 1.5km Bright Band Ground and sea clutter 10km 9km 8km 7km 6km 5km 4km 3km 2km 1km 5.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 Fig. 2.3.1 Scan strategy of KMA operational radar.

Fig. 2.3.2 The effective height obtained by radar scan range. Fig. 2.3.3 Raingauges distribution in scan range of Gwangdeoksan radar.

GDK radar RADAR Reflectivity of each radar With 241 X 241 of 1km resolution Rain Gauge 10min rain-rate rate using WPMM Find matching grid point Make PDF Apply PMM Set the mininum dbz Z-R R relationship of each dbz at RainGauge Convert rain-rate rate from reflectivity GDK Z-RZ Composite rain-rate rate from radar-raingauge raingauge rain rate Fig. 2.7.1 The flow chart of the merged precipitation of radar-raingauge raingauge from radar dbz and raingauges.

Rain gauge point 241 241 AWS 1km Fig 2.8.1 Space-time diagram for the calculation of correlation between rainfall rate and reflectivity.

Z (dbz Radar Reflectivity 30 40 50 60 Y (RAIN AWS Rain Gauge X (TIME Fig 2.8.2 Space-time diagram for the calculation of correlation between rainfall rate and reflectivity.

Fig. 3.1.1 (a Cummulative Density Function(CDF of rainfall rate and (b CDF of radar reflectivity on 14 Feb. 2004. 04.

Fig. 3.1.2 Z-R Z R relationship between AWS rainfall rate and radar reflectivity obtained by Probability Density Function(PDF matching method on 14 Feb. 2004.

Fig. 3.1.3 Comparison of rainfall rate between AWS rainfall rate and CWPMM's rainfall rate from 0000 to 2400 KST 14 Feb. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.1.4 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=2000R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0400 KST 14 Feb. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.1.5 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=2000R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0500 KST 14 Feb. 2004.

Table 3.2.1 The best correlation coefficient of rainfall rate on the matched grids between AWS and radar reflectivity on 12 Jul. 2004. AWS ID Correlation AWS ID Correlation AWS ID Correlation 95( -0.127 535( 0.4696 587( 0.4316 101( 0.326 536( 0.1562 588( 0.2845 211( 0.34 542( 0.1881 591( 0.2606 212( 0.198 552( 0.217 593( 0.3299 321( 0.564 553( 0.5398 594( 0.29 322( 0.348 554( 0.3627 595( 0.2386 323( 0.267 555( 0.6642 596( 0.5886 455( 0.275 556( 0.6633 650( 0.2104 505( 0.204 557( 0.2448 651( 0.6835 517( 0.367 558( 0.1506 661( 0.5931 518( 0.229 559( 0.1918 680( 0.5937 519( 0.414 561( 0.0261 877( 0.0023 520( 0.403 568( 0.2634 522( 0.524 585( 0.1905 531( 0.467 586( 0.2534

Fig. 3.2.1 The best correlation coefficient of rainfall rate on the matched grids between AWS and radar reflectivity on 12 Jul. 2004.

Fig. 3.2.2 Z-R Z R relationship in case of stratiform rain between AWS rainfall rate and radar reflectivity obtained by Probability Density Function(PDF matching method on 12 Jul. 2004.

Fig. 3.2.3 Z-R Z R relationship in case of convective rain between AWS rainfall rate and radar reflectivity obtained by Probability Density Function(PDF matching method on 12 Jul. 2004.

Fig. 3.2.4 Comparison of rainfall rate in convective and stratiform rain by Z-RZ relationship.

Fig. 3.2.5 Comparison of rainfall rate between AWS rainfall rate e and CWPMM's rainfall rate from 0000 to 2400 KST 12 Jul. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.2.6 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0100 0 KST 12 Jul. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.2.7 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0200 0 KST 12 Jul. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.2.8 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0300 0 KST 12 Jul. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.2.9 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0400 0 KST 12 Jul. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.2.10 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity ty of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0500 0 KST 12 Jul. 2004.

Table 3.3.1 The best correlation coefficient of rainfall rate on the matched grids between AWS and radar reflectivity on 17 Aug. 2004. AWS ID Correlation AWS ID Correlation AWS ID Correlation 95( 0.177 535( 0.824 587( 0.796 101( 0.734 536( -0.436 588( 0.063 211( 0.872 542( -0.569 591( 0.068 212( 0.476 552( -0.017 593( 0.733 321( 0.128 553( 0.417 594( 0.894 322( 0 554( 0.702 595( 0.915 323( -0.287 555( 0.836 596( 0.830 455( -0.207 556( 0.655 650( 0.155 505( 0.558 557( 0.282 651( 0.775 517( 0.116 558( 0.417 661( 0.367 518( 0.755 559( 0.729 680( -0.417 519( 0.580 561( 0.470 877( 0 520( 0.816 568( 0 522( 0.563 585( 0.359 531( 0.477 586( 0.525

Fig. 3.3.1 The best correlation coefficient of rainfall rate on the matched grids between AWS and radar reflectivity on 17 Aug. 2004.

Fig. 3.3.2 Z-R Z R relationship in case of stratiform and convective rain between AWS rainfall rate and radar reflectivity obtained by Probability y Density Function(PDF matching method on 17 Aug. 2004.

Fig. 3.3.3 Comparison of rainfall rate in convective and stratiform rain by Z-RZ relationship on 17 Aug. 2004..

Fig. 3.3.4 Comparison of rainfall rate between AWS rainfall rate and CWPMM's rainfall rate from 0000 to 2400 KST 17 Aug. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.3.5 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0100 0 KST 17 Aug. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.3.6 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0200 0 KST 17 Aug. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.3.7 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0300 0 KST 17 Aug. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.3.8 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0400 0 KST 17 Aug. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.3.9 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 0500 0 KST 17 Aug. 2004.

Table 3.4.1 The best correlation coefficient of rainfall rate on the matched grids between AWS and radar reflectivity on 12 Sep. 2004. AWS ID Correlation AWS ID Correlation AWS ID Correlation 95( -0.127 535( -0.041 587( 0.84 101( 0.326 536( -0.169 588( -0.135 211( 0.873 542( 0.466 591( -0.061 212( 0.239 552( 0.518 593( 0 321( -0.064 553( 0.238 594( 0.775 322( 0.409 554( 0.768 595( 0.661 323( -0.408 555( 0.902 596( 0.913 455( -0.169 556( 0.674 650( 0.12 505( 0.368 557( 0 651( -0.112 517( 0.403 558( -0.288 661( 0.149 518( 0.594 559( 0.232 680( 0.709 519( 0.428 561( -0.589 877( -0.152 520( 0.891 568( 0.777 522( 0.646 585( 0.678 531( -0.323 586( 0.768

Fig. 3.4.1 The best correlation coefficient of rainfall rate on the matched grids between AWS and radar reflectivity on 12 Sep. 2004.

Fig. 3.4.2 Z-R Z R relationship in case of stratiform and convective rain between AWS rainfall rate and radar reflectivity obtained by Probability y Density Function(PDF matching method on 12 Sep. 2004.

Fig. 3.4.3 Comparison of rainfall rate in convective and stratiform rain by Z-RZ relationship on 12 Sep. 2004..

Fig. 3.4.4. Comparison of the actual rainfall rate measured by raingauge and the estimated rainfall rate by WPMM from 2004.9.12.00:00 00:00 to 2004.9.12.24:00.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.4.5 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 2200 0 KST 12 Sep. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.4.6 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 2300 0 KST 12 Sep. 2004.

(d (a (b (c Fig. 3.4.7 The distribution of precipitation for (a reflectivity y of radar, (b rainfall rate by WPMM, (c rainfall rate by Z=200R 1.6, (d AWS hourly accumulated rainfall rates on 2400 0 KST 12 Sep. 2004.