PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

Similar documents
ETL_project_best_practice1.ppt

DW 개요.PDF

Oracle Apps Day_SEM

ecorp-프로젝트제안서작성실무(양식3)

BSC Discussion 1

Microsoft PowerPoint - 3.공영DBM_최동욱_본부장-중소기업의_실용주의_CRM

untitled

1.장인석-ITIL 소개.ppt

歯CRM개괄_허순영.PDF

슬라이드 1

15_3oracle

untitled

F1-1(수정).ppt

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

歯목차45호.PDF

CRM Fair 2004

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

김기남_ATDC2016_160620_[키노트].key

Innovation: CEO In 2006, 2 in 3 CEOs said they would have to bring about fundamental change to their business in the next 2 years to implement their s

첨 부 1. 설문분석 결과 2. 교육과정 프로파일 169

ecorp-프로젝트제안서작성실무(양식4)

Model Investor MANDO Portal Site People Customer BIS Supplier C R M PLM ERP MES HRIS S C M KMS Web -Based

Service-Oriented Architecture Copyright Tmax Soft 2005

Microsoft PowerPoint - 6.CRM_Consulting.ppt

歯1.PDF

歯두산3.PDF

歯부장

untitled

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Intra_DW_Ch4.PDF

FMX M JPG 15MB 320x240 30fps, 160Kbps 11MB View operation,, seek seek Random Access Average Read Sequential Read 12 FMX () 2

13 Who am I? R&D, Product Development Manager / Smart Worker Visualization SW SW KAIST Software Engineering Computer Engineering 3

E-BI Day Presentation

<C7C1B7A3C2F7C0CCC1EE20B4BABAF1C1EEB4CFBDBA20B7B1C4AA20BBE7B7CA5FBCADB9CEB1B35F28C3D6C1BE292E687770>

06_±è¼öö_0323

Microsoft Word doc

목순 차서 v KM의 현황 v Web2.0 의 개념 v Web2.0의 도입 사례 v Web2.0의 KM 적용방안 v 고려사항 1/29

<C1DF3320BCF6BEF7B0E8C8B9BCAD2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Microsoft PowerPoint - KNOM Tutorial 2005_IT서비스관리기술.ppt

3Æí2Àå¨éÀç

대학교육151호-합침

SW¹é¼Ł-³¯°³Æ÷ÇÔÇ¥Áö2013


울산(전체본).hwp

OUR INSIGHT. YOUR FUTURE. Disclaimer Presentation ( ),. Presentation,..,,,,, (E).,,., Presentation,., Representative.( ). ( ).

SchoolNet튜토리얼.PDF

슬라이드 1

untitled

VOL /2 Technical SmartPlant Materials - Document Management SmartPlant Materials에서 기본적인 Document를 관리하고자 할 때 필요한 세팅, 파일 업로드 방법 그리고 Path Type인 Ph

(......).hwp

example code are examined in this stage The low pressure pressurizer reactor trip module of the Plant Protection System was programmed as subject for

슬라이드 1

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

KRG. IT Research & Consulting... Providing INSIGHT Into IT Market.. Developing Business STRATEGY.. Supporting Marketing ACTIVITY 주요 수행 프로젝트 IT기업 성장성 평

untitled

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

학습영역의 Taxonomy에 기초한 CD-ROM Title의 효과분석

08SW

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

Portal_9iAS.ppt [읽기 전용]

2016년 사보

CRM A Study on the Datawarehousing build_up methodology for CRM System :



Software Requirrment Analysis를 위한 정보 검색 기술의 응용

정보기술응용학회 발표

03.Agile.key

슬라이드 제목 없음

歯통신41호.PDF

<30362E20C6EDC1FD2DB0EDBFB5B4EBB4D420BCF6C1A42E687770>

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

Oracle9i Real Application Clusters

, ( ) 1) *.. I. (batch). (production planning). (downstream stage) (stockout).... (endangered). (utilization). *

1. BSC, Cycle [Uncertainty Issue], P What To Do? -, IT Process ing Issue ( Key Initiative) [Decision Making Issue] Workout -Brain Storming - Logic Tre


How we create value? 안전경영 조직 및 시스템 강화 위원장 위원 간사 CEO 전략사장, CFO, 인사지원실장, 사업부장, 사업장장 안전환경인프라팀장 삼성SDI는 안전사고의 위험성에 대비하고 안전한 근무환경을 조성하기 위해 전담부서 개 편과 업무 관리범위

09김정식.PDF

<C3D6C1BE5F2D FBCF6C1A42E687770>

untitled

우리들이 일반적으로 기호

(3) () () LOSS LOSS LOSS LOSS (4) = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

0212-책표지-앞.ps, page Preflight ( 책표지-앞 )

歯경영혁신 단계별 프로그램 사례.ppt


정진명 남재원 떠오르고 있다. 배달앱서비스는 소비자가 배달 앱서비스를 이용하여 배달음식점을 찾고 음식 을 주문하며, 대금을 결제까지 할 수 있는 서비 스를 말한다. 배달앱서비스는 간편한 음식 주문 과 바로결제 서비스를 바탕으로 전 연령층에서 빠르게 보급되고 있는 반면,

2017 1

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

The characteristic analysis of winners and losers in curling: Focused on shot type, shot accuracy, blank end and average score SungGeon Park 1 & Soowo

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

The Self-Managing Database : Automatic Health Monitoring and Alerting

<BCAEBBE7C7D0C0A75FB3EDB9AE2D28B9DAC7F6C0DA292D E687770>

歯주5일본문.PDF

<315FC7A5C1F628BED5B8E9292E687770>

0125_ 워크샵 발표자료_완성.key

<332EC0E5B3B2B0E62E687770>

CONTENTS January 2008, VOL IP Report 59 IP Column 101 IP Information 123 IP News

시안

Transcription:

CRM Data Quality Management 2003 2003. 11. 11 (SK ) hskim226@skcorp.com

Why Quality Management? Prologue,,. Water Source Management 2 Low Quality Water 1) : High Quality Water 2) : ( ) Water Quality Management Change Management 1) 2) 2

Agenda I. Data Quality 1. Data Quality 2. 3. Data Quality II. Data Quality Management 1. Data Quality Management 2. Data Quality Management Framework III. Data Quality Management 1. DB 2. Data Enrichment 3. Data Process IV. SK Data Quality Management System V. Conclusion 1. Total Cost of Data Quality 2. 3

1. Data Quality I. Data Quality Data 10~25%, IT 40~50%, Data Quality. Data cost? Data Strategy Issue Little 4% Not sure 9% High 42% Business IT Data Quality Management. -IT Issue Database Performance 16% Management Expectations 17% Moderate 49% * Assential, Priority Learning - 100, 2001 Business Rule Analysis Legacy Data Transformation 22% 25% - Non quality data costs End-user Expectations 29% (Procession Cost) (Marketing Cost) Mission (Corporate Risk) Business Data Modeling Managing Data Quality 31% 46% * The Data Warehouse Institute - 1,670, 2000 4

1. Data Quality I. Data Quality Gartner, CRM Data (According to a report by Gartner, Inc., the no. 1 reason for CRM failures is ignoring the data) 7 Key Reasons Why CRM Fails, Gartner, Inc.Nelson & Kirkby, 2001 DW Data Quality [Information customer ] (Experience is revealing that more than half of data warehouse built fail to meet expectations because of poor information quality) Improving DW and Business IQ, Larry English, 1999 Data Warehousing Institute, 6,000 ( 720 ) Data Quality (The Data Warehousing Institute estimates that data quality problems cost U.S. businesses more than $600 billion a year) DQ and the Bottom Line, Wayne Eckerson, 2001 CRM Data Application,. Integrating disparate distributed data, applications, and legacy systems across multiple organizations is the single most significant barrier to enterprise CRM execution Research Report, Meta Group, 2000 5

2. Data I. Data Quality LTV, Mission., LTV Mission. (Scrap & Rework ) Data (Cleansing ) / Data Process Failure Non quality Data (DM/TM ) Non quality Data, Mission Mission 6

2. Data : 1 I. Data Quality Data Mining Sampling ~ Modification 50~70%, Modeling, Model Quality. Data Mining Process < Risk of Non-quality Data > D/W D/W Sampling Exploration Modification Data Data Scrap Data Data Modeling Assessment Data Model Model.. 7

2. Data : 2 I. Data Quality Slang,. Communication : : 1111 Slang D/W Slang D/W Slang 8

3. Data Quality I. Data Quality Consistently meeting all knowledge worker and end-customer expectations through Data and Data services to accomplish enterprise and customer objectives - Larry English Consistently : Data Quality Data Meeting : Data, Needs. Knowledge Worker & End Customer : Data Data Quality Information Customer Expectations : Information Quality 9

Agenda I. Data Quality 1. Data Quality 2. 3. Data Quality II. Data Quality Management 1. Data Quality Management 2. Data Quality Management Framework III. Data Quality Management 1. DB 2. Data Enrichment 3. Data Process IV. SK Data Quality Management System V. Conclusion 1. Total Cost of Data Quality 2. 10

1. Data Quality Management II. Data Quality Management Data Quality Management, /. DB / Data / Data Enrichment / Data Data Process Data Quality Management System 11

2. Data Quality Management Framework II. Data Quality Management Data Quality Management DB Data Enrichment, Data Process, Data Quality Management System. Data Quality Management DB Data Enrichment Data Process Needs Enrichment DB / / - - Enrichment Process Data Process Data Quality Management System Merge/Purge Tool DataStat,, Tool 12

Agenda I. Data Quality 1. Data Quality 2. 3. Data Quality II. Data Quality Management 1. Data Quality Management 2. Data Quality Management Framework III. Data Quality Management 1. DB 2. Data Enrichment 3. Data Process IV. SK Data Quality Management System V. Conclusion 1. Total Cost of Data Quality 2. 13

1. DB III. Data Quality Management Needs 14

2. Data Enrichment III. Data Quality Management Data Enrichment Data, Source /. Data Enrichment Data Enrichment Data Enrichment 3.,. Source / / /, 15

2. Data Enrichment III. Data Quality Management Data Enrichment Data Needs Segment,,, Issue Data Enrichment Cycle. Data Enrichment Data Needs Data Needs. Data Enrichment Needs, / Enrichment Segment,. Data Enrichment Enrichment. Enrichment / Data Data Enrichment. Feedback Data Enrichment, Enrichment Issue Data Enrichment. 16

2. : Data Enrichment III. Data Quality Management 17

3. Data Process III. Data Quality Management Data Process Data DW Knowledge Worker, / ECTL Data. Data Warehouse Strategic/Tactical Knowledge Worker ECTL* Repository/ Data Dictionary Business Data Customer Operational Knowledge Worker External Data Information Producer * ECTL : Extract, Correction, Transformation, Loading 18

3. Data Process III. Data Quality Management 19

Agenda I. Data Quality 1. Data Quality 2. 3. Data Quality II. Data Quality Management 1. Data Quality Management 2. Data Quality Management Framework III. Data Quality Management 1. DB 2. Data Enrichment 3. Data Process IV. SK Data Quality Management System V. Conclusion 1. Total Cost of Data Quality 2. 20

1. Merge/Purge System IV. SK Data Quality Management System Merge/Purge,, 3. FTP : 21

1. Merge/Purge System : IV. SK Data Quality Management System M/P / Data, Data process. [ M/P ] [ M/P Data check ] M/P M/P (%) 229,952 3,570,960 1 3,461,797 2 1,505,547 1 1,473,622 2 4,043,207 4,043,207 2,442,159 371,800 0 0-100 60.4 5.69 9.19 88.32 85.62 0 37.24 36.45 0 M/P M/P (%) 4,043,207 3,879,217 2,116,827 190,973 384,761 3,222,352 3,225,030 1,909,486 291,000 291,345 213,542-95.94 52.35 4.72 9.52 79.7 79.76 47.23 7.2 7.2 5.28 0 163,990 325,332 38,979-12,961 348,608 236,767-1,909,486 1,214,547 1,182,277-213,542 (3,4 ) (3,4 ) Example 3,879,217 14,018 149,433 527 12 2,116,827 10,128 204,062 71,272 39,743 190,973 6,686 8,907 6,727 12,504 22

2. DataStat IV. SK Data Quality Management System / Reference DB / *. Example 23

3. COSMOS : Column Statistics Monitoring System IV. SK Data Quality Management System DB Column Total Count, Not Null count, DB Data. - Numeric Data Min, Max, Average, Sum,, 0, Count,. - Date Data (Invalid Count), Min, Max,, - Code Data Domain, Domain Data. Example 24

4. Meta IV. SK Data Quality Management System Meta, Data, Biz Rule, Data,, Data. Meta DB, Biz Rule, Type, Data.,. Example 25

Agenda I. Data Quality 1. Data Quality 2. 3. Data Quality II. Data Quality Management 1. Data Quality Management 2. Data Quality Management Framework III. Data Quality Management 1. DB 2. Data Enrichment 3. Data Process IV. SK Data Quality Management System V. Conclusion 1. Total Cost of Data Quality 2. 26

1. Total Cost of Data Quality Management V. Conclusion DQM., Awakening Data Danger Point. Danger Point Data Quality Cost Information Scrap & rework & Process Failure Costs Data Correction Costs Assessment Costs IQ Improvement, Environment Investments Stage 1 Uncertainty Stage 2 Awakening Stage 3 Enlightenment Time Stage 4 Wisdom Stage 5 Certainty information quality information quality? information quality,. Information quality. Information Quality. 27

2. V. Conclusion DQM Task :. /,. Start Now :.(CRM ) 28

App.1 : Ten Essential Ingredients of Information Quality Management Appendix 1. Understand information quality is a business problem, not just a system problem; and solve it as a business process, not just as a systems process. 2. Focus on the information customers and suppliers, not just the data. 3. Focus on all components of information, including definition, content and presentation. 4. Implement information quality management processes, not just information quality software. 5. Measure data accuracy, not just validity. 6. Measure costs -not just percent- of non-quality information and business results of quality information. 7. Emphasize process improvement and preventive maintenance(plan-do-check-act), not just corrective maintenance (data cleansing). 8. Improve processes at the source, not just in downstream business areas. 9. Provide quality training to managers and information producers (who are their information customers and what do they need?). 10. Actively transform the culture, don t just implement activities. 29

App.2: The 13 th Information Quality Conference Appendix 1. 2. 30

App.2: The 13 th Information Quality Conference - Appendix 3. Keynotes 31

Q & A 32