DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Similar documents
서론 34 2

<303320C0CCBDC2B1B3BFDC28BCF6BFF8C1F6BFAA296F6B2E687770>


한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

012임수진

hwp

27 2, 1-16, * **,,,,. KS,,,., PC,.,,.,,. :,,, : 2009/08/12 : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/30 * ** ( :


전립선암발생률추정과관련요인분석 : The Korean Cancer Prevention Study-II (KCPS-II)

Lumbar spine

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

<BFCFBCBA30362DC0B1BFECC3B62E687770>

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의


歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

2007)...,,,,,, 조사대상및시기 Inbody 520(, ) (BMI) 22.9, BMI 체성분검사 (Inbody 520),,,, BMI,,. (, DS-102) 0.1cm

hwp

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타


untitled

(김정현).fm


< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

1..

노인정신의학회보14-1호

<35BFCFBCBA2E687770>

현재도 피운다. (a) Half pack a day (b) half to one pack a day 반 갑 미만 반 갑 ~ 한 갑 (c) one to two packs a day (d) more than 2 packs a day 한 갑 ~ 두 갑 두 갑 이상 5. Ho

03-서연옥.hwp

Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ

A 617

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :




Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

보고서_pdf로.hwp

Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

현대패션의 로맨틱 이미지에 관한 연구


여대생의 섭식장애, 초기부터 초기 성인기에 이르는 여성에게서 더욱 두드러지는 데, 이 시기의 여대생은 대인관계 형성이 중요한 발달과제이고 매력적인 외모가 이런 과제의 성취에서 중요한 역할을 하기 때 문이다. 특히 여대생들은마른체형을선호하는사회문화적 영향으로 잘못된 방법

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

(): () (, ),, (Ministry of Health and Welfare, ), (Lee MJ ; Kim SY ).,,,,,,,,,,,, (Ministry of Health and Welfare, ).,., (Pak DJ ). (Park JS ). (Pak D

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF


<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>

들어가면서 본 식생활가이드 는 여러분께서 받으신 식생활 평가지의 내용을 쉽게 이해하실 수 있도록 구성되었습니다. 식생활 평가지는 식품섭취조사에서 응답하신 내용을 기반으로 분석하여 체중평가, 에너지 섭취평가, 식품 섭취 평가, 영양소 섭취 평가 등의 내용을 포함하고 있습

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

03이경미(237~248)ok

<C3D6C1BE5F C7D1B1B9B1B8B0ADBAB8B0C7B0FAC7D0C8B8C1F62E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

(Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern (Micro- Environment) Re

歯1.PDF

歯14.양돈규.hwp

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

달생산이 초산모 분만시간에 미치는 영향 Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 達 은 23) 의 丹 溪 에 최초로 기 재된 처방으로, 에 복용하면 한 다하여 난산의 예방과 및, 등에 널리 활용되어 왔다. 達 은 이 毒 하고 는 甘 苦 하여 氣, 氣 寬,, 結 의 효능이 있

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

ePapyrus PDF Document

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

자기공명영상장치(MRI) 자장세기에 따른 MRI 품질관리 영상검사의 개별항목점수 실태조사 A B Fig. 1. High-contrast spatial resolution in phantom test. A. Slice 1 with three sets of hole arr

590호(01-11)

?

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

03-ÀÌÁ¦Çö

139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ

00약제부봄호c03逞풚


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

<31342EBCBAC7FDBFB52E687770>

untitled

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

433대지05박창용

12이문규

,......

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Treatment and Role of Hormaonal Replaement Therapy

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<BFACBCBCC0C7BBE7C7D E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

SG프랜-한남점 지노영수정.QXP

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

141(26) () ( ( ) () () () ) 2) 1932 ()()3) 2 1) ( ) ( ) () () () 4) ( ) 5) 6) ) ) ( ) () 42 () )

Kinematic analysis of success strategy of YANG Hak Seon technique Joo-Ho Song 1, Jong-Hoon Park 2, & Jin-Sun Kim 3 * 1 Korea Institute of Sport Scienc

Pharmacotherapeutics Application of New Pathogenesis on the Drug Treatment of Diabetes Young Seol Kim, M.D. Department of Endocrinology Kyung Hee Univ

<C3D6C1BEBFCFBCBA2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D31C8A3292E687770>

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Transcription:

J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 25(1): 49 63 (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2015.2.25.1.49 49 1 1 2 3 1, 2, 3 Study on Body Awareness, and Health Status according to Body Mass Index of College Women in Seoul Area Kyung-Ok Shin 1, Kyung-Soon Choi 1, Kyoung-Sik Han 2 and Min-Seok Choi 3 1 Dept. of Food and Nutrition, Sahmyook University, Seoul 139-742, Korea 2 Dept. of Animal Resources, Sahmyook University, Seoul 139-742, Korea 3 Dept. of Management Information System, Sahmyook University, Seoul 139-742, Korea ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to investigate body recognition, eating patterns, and health status of female college students in Seoul according to body mass index. In this study, we classified subjects as underweight, normal weight, and obese according to BMI. The mean age of subjects was 20.69±1.72 years. Average height, weight or BMI of subjects were 161.49±5.39 cm, 52.17±6.53 kg and 20.01±2.35 kg/m 2, respectively. Body satisfaction rate was 11.5% for Yes, whereas body dissatisfaction rate was 88.5% (p<). Body dissatisfaction rates for the overweight, body dissatisfaction and underweight groups were 54.7%, 37.5% and 3.1%, respectively. The most common reason for controlling weight was 52.8% for to look pretty, whereas stress at 45.5% was the most common in the obese group. Exercise + diet therapy was used by 48.7%, followed by hungry (23.9%), exercise (17.3%) and intermittent diet (6.1%). Regular exercise 35.3%, A good rest & sleep 32.4% and Regular meals & taking nutrition 26.6% were significantly important (p<). Overeating was lower among obese subjects, whereas consumption of fried foods and high-fat meats was higher (p<). These results suggest the need for proper nutrition education for college students. Key words : BMI, body awareness, weight-control, eating habit, healthy eating index Corresponding author : Kyung-Ok Shin, Tel: +82-2-3399-1657, Fax: +82-2-3399-1655, E-mail: skorose@syu.ac.kr,., (Pak & Son 2002; Nam et al 2014)., (Nam et al 2014). (Cho IK 2003; Lim & Rha 2007; Kim KY 2008; Kim et al 2009; Nam et al 2014),,. (Kim SH 1995; Choi et al 2008; Choi et al 2010; Choi et al 2012). (Lee et al 1997; Cheong et al 2002; Kim et al 2004; Yoon HS 2006; Choi et al 2008; Choi et al 2012),,,. (Sung MH 2005; Nam et al 2014).,,,,

50 (Chyun et al 2000; Lee & Chang 2007; Choi et al 2008; Choi et al 2010; Choi et al 2012; Nam et al 2014). Nam et al(2014)., (Nam et al 2014).,,,,,,. 1. S 19 21 233 2013 10 2013 11, 217. (Body mass index : BMI) 52, 154, 11,,,,,. 2. (Yoon GA 2004, Shin & Choi 2014) BMI 25.0 kg/m 2,,. 2),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. 3),,,,,,. 4).,,,,,. 5),,,,,,. 1) (Samhwa Company, Korea) (Tanita corporation, Japan), [Body Mass Index: BMI, (kg)/ (m 2 )]. (World Health Organization 2000; Anuurad et al 2003; Shin & Choi 2014) (BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 ), (18.5 kg/m 2 BMI < 24.9 kg/m 2 ), (BMI 25.0 kg/m 2 ). BMI 25 kg/m 2 6) 10 (Kim et al 2003). (, ) 1,,,,,,, (1 ) (1 ), 2, (,, ) 2,

25(1): 49 63 (2015) 51,,,,, (, ) 2 (.). 3. SPSS version 18.0(SPSS Inc, Chicago, 11., U.S.A.). one-way Anova, (p<) Duncan.,, p< χ 2 -test. 1. Table 1. 20.69,, 161.49 cm, 52.17 kg 20.01 kg/m 2. 19 29 ( 160 cm, 56.3 kg)(the Korean Nutrition Society 2010), 1.49 cm, 4.13 kg., 45.76 kg, 53.0.37 kg 66.36 kg (p<). 17.43 kg/m 2, 20.42 kg/m 2 26.44 kg/m 2. (Yu & Lee 2004), 162.2 cm, 46.2 kg, 17.6 kg/m 2, Hong et al(2011) 163.1 cm, 54.0 kg, 20.3 kg/m 2. Kim & Kim (2005) 162.6 cm, 51.8 kg, Cheong et al(2007) 6 162.3 cm, Shin & Chung(2010) 161.56 cm, 51.98 kg. Choi et al (2012) 2008 2, 161.3 cm, 51.8 kg 19.2 kg/m 2, 2011 2, 161.7 cm, 51.3 kg 19.6 kg/m 2,. Nam et al(2014) 21.0,, 161.9 cm, 47.0 kg 17.9 kg/m 2. (2012), ( (kg/m 2 ) 25 ) 19 29 12.1%,. 2., Table 2 Table 3. 11.5%, 1) Table 1. Anthropometric characteristics of subjects Variables Mean±S.D. Body mass index Underweight Normal weight Obese Significance Age (years) 20.69±1.72 1) 20.85±1.47 20.65±1.78 20.55±2.02 2) Height (cm) 161.49±5.39 162.02±4.82 161.0.41±5.05 158.32±10.33 Weight (kg) 52.17±6.53 45.76±4.01 a 53.0.37±4.61 b 66.36±7.61 c 3) BMI 4) (kg/m 2 ) 20.01±2.35 17.43±1.22 a 20.42±1.34 b 26.44±1.23 c Mean±S.D. 2) : statistically no significant difference at p< by ANOVA-test. 3) a c values with different alphabet were significant different among groups at p< by Duncan's multiple range test. 4) BMI : body mass index.

52 Table 2. Body awareness and satisfaction ( I ) Body satisfaction Reason of dissatisfaction body The most satisfying parts of the body part Worry about weight-control An instrument to control weight The advice for weight-control The desired degree of weight loss Intent surgery and prescription drugs Worry about food during weight loss Yes 15(28.8) 1) 10( 6.5) - 25(11.5) No 37(71.2) 144(93.5) 11(100) 192(88.5) Overweight 7(18.9) 88(61.1) 10(90.9) 105(48.4) Underweight 6(16.2) - - 6( 2.8) Body dissatisfaction 21(56.8) 51(35.4) - 72(33.1) Others 18( 8.1) 15( 3.5) 1( 9.1) 34(15.7) Face 11(21.2) 26(16.9) 4(36.4) 41(18.9) Head 4( 7.7) 15( 9.7) - 19( 8.8) Shoulder 3( 5.8) 20(13.0) 2(18.2) 25(11.5) Breast 1( 1.9) 13( 8.4) 1( 9.9) 15( 6.9) Belly 4( 7.7) 10( 6.5) - 14( 6.5) Hip 8(15.4) 12( 7.8) 1( 9.9) 21( 9.7) Leg - 3( 1.9) - 3( 1.4) Hight 12(23.1) 22(14.3) - 34(15.9) Weight 2( 3.8) 31(20.1) 3(27.3) 36(16.6) Appearance 7(13.5) 2( 1.3) - 9( 4.1) Yes 39(75.0) 147(95.5) 11(100) 197(90.8) No 13(25.0) 7( 4.5) - 20( 9.2) Looks pretty 24(61.5) 77(52.4) 3(27.3) 104(52.8) Healthy 2( 5.1) 16(10.9) 2(18.2) 20(10.2) Treatment of disease - - - - Advice - 2( 1.4) 1( 9.1) 3( 1.5) Stress 13(33.3) 51(34.7) 5(45.5) 69(35.0) Others - 1( 0.7) - 1( 0.5) For yourself 36(92.3) 127(86.4) 8(72.7) 171(86.8) Parents 2( 5.1) 12( 8.2) 2(18.2) 16( 8.1) Friends - 7( 4.8) 1( 9.1) 8( 4.1) Others 1( 2.6) 1( 0.7) - 2( 1.0) 1 2 kg 17(43.6) 9( 6.1) - 26(13.2) 3 5 kg 15(38.5) 74(50.3) 1( 9.1) 90(45.7) 6 8 kg 3( 7.7) 36(24.5) 1( 9.1) 40(20.3) 9 kg 4(10.3) 28(19.0) 9(81.8) 41(20.8) Yes 5(12.8) 43(29.3) 4(36.4) 52(26.4) No 34(87.2) 104(70.7) 7(63.6) 145(73.6) Carbohydrate foods 7(17.9) 49(33.4) 3(27.3) 58(29.4) Fast food 22(56.4) 77(52.4) 7(63.6) 1( 0.5) 2) 3)

25(1): 49 63 (2015) 53 Table 2. Continued Worry about food during weight loss Method of weight-control Sugar foods 7(17.9) 13( 8.8) - 106(53.8) Alcohol 2( 5.1) 7( 4.8) 1( 9.1) 20(10.2) Others 1( 2.6) 1( 0.7) - 12( 6.1) The hungry 13(33.3) 32(21.8) 2(18.2) 47(23.9) One food diet - 1( 0.7) - 1( 0.5) Protein diet - 4( 2.7) - 4( 2.0) Diet supplements and injections 1( 2.6) 2( 1.4) - 3( 1.5) Exercise 10(25.6) 22(15.0) 2(18.2) 34(17.3) Exercise + diet therapy 14(35.9) 75(51.0) 7(63.6) 96(48.7) Intermittent diet 1( 2.6) 11( 7.5) - 12( 6.1) 1) 2) 3) N(%) : number of subjects, the relative % of subjects. Significant at p< by χ 2 -test. : statistically no significant difference at p< by χ 2 -test. 88.5%. 71.2%, 93.5%, 100% (p<). 56.8%, 61.1% 90.9% (p<). (Lee & Park 2003) 15.6% 37.5%, Rhee JH(2007),,.,, (Hong et al 2011). Hong et al(2011) 90.1%, BMI, 64.9%, 26%, (p<0.0001). Lee & Lee (1996) 17.2%, 2.1%, 61.0%, 31.5%. (Cho & Kang 2004), 74.3%,. Ju et al(2013),. Table 3. Body awareness and satisfaction ( II ) < 1 weeks 13(33.3) 1) 17(11.6) - 30(15.2) Try period of weight-control 1 weeks 1 month 13(33.3) 50(34.0) 3(27.3) 66(33.5) 1 3 month 6(15.4) 55(37.4) 7(63.6) 68(34.5) 3 6 month 2( 5.1) 20(13.6) 1( 9.1) 23(11.7) 1 years 5(12.8) 5( 3.4) - 10( 5.1) 2)

54 Table 3. Continued Self-confidence 28(71.8) 94(63.9) 8(72.7) 130(66.0) Emerging changes in the weight-control Maintaining weight The reason for the failure of weight loss Side effects of weight loss Learn about weight loss Cost for weight-control (10 4 won) Disease appears after weight loss Study - 1( 0.7) - 1( 0.5) Healthy 1( 2.6) 26(17.7) 1( 9.1) 28(14.2) Complete disease remission - - - - Never 10(25.6) 26(17.7) 2(18.2) 38(19.3) Yes 20(51.3) 47(32.0) 2(18.2) 69(35.0) No 19(48.7) 100(68.0) 9(81.8) 128(65.0) Lack of willingness 15(78.9) 73(73.0) 6(66.7) 94(73.4) The wrong way 2(10.5) 7( 7.0) - 9( 7.0) Study - 8( 8.0) 2(22.2) 10( 7.8) Disturbance of the surrounding environment and friends - 9( 9.0) 1(11.1) 10( 7.8) Others 2(10.5) 3( 3.0) - 5( 3.9) Yo-yo syndrome 5(26.3) 30(30.0) 4(44.4) 39(30.5) Increased appetite 3(15.8) 19(19.0) - 22(17.2) Anemia 6(31.6) 13(13.0) - 19(14.8) Stress - 8( 8.0) 1(11.2) 9( 7.0) Others 5(26.3) 30(30.0) 4(44.4) 39(30.5) Internet 27(69.2) 109(74.1) 8(72.7) 144(73.1) Hospital consultation 2( 5.1) 4( 2.7) 1( 9.1) 7( 3.6) Book and magazine 1( 2.6) 8( 5.4) - 9( 4.6) Friends and family 6(15.4) 17(11.6) 2(18.2) 25(12.7) Others 3( 7.7) 9( 6.1) - 12( 6.1) 5 10 26(66.7) 82(55.8) 3(27.3) 111(56.3) 10 20 5(12.8) 45(30.6) 5(45.5) 55(27.9) 20 30 3( 7.7) 11( 7.5) 3(27.3) 17( 8.6) 30 5(12.8) 9( 6.1) - 14( 7.1) Anemia 11(28.2) 29(19.7) 1( 9.1) 41(20.8) Irregular menstruation 3( 7.7) 22(15.0) 1( 9.1) 26(13.2) Osteoporosis 1( 2.6) 1( 0.7) - 2( 1.0) Breakdown of body 14(35.9) 42(28.6) 1( 9.1) 57(28.9) Anorexia - 3( 2.0) 1( 9.1) 4( 2.0) Others 10(25.8) 50(34.0) 7(63.6) 67(34.0) 3) 1) 2) 3) N(%) : number of subjects, the relative % of subjects. Significant at p< by χ 2 -test. : statistically no significant difference at p< by χ 2 -test.

25(1): 49 63 (2015) 55, (23.1%), (21.2%), (15.4%), (13.5%), (20.1%), (16.9%), (14.3%), (13.0%),, (36.4%), (27.3%), (18.2%) (p< ). 52.8%, 35.0% 10.2%, 45.5%. 86.8%, 8.1% 4.1%. Hong et al(2011) 8.0%, 92.0%. (Lee et al 2005; Ahn & Park 2009; Cho & Choi 2010), 85.7%, 91.9% 92.8%. 1 2 kg 43.6%, 3 5 kg 50.3%, 9 kg 81.8% (p<). 26.4%, 73.6%. 53.8%. (48.7%), 23.9%, 17.3%, 6.1%. Yu et al(2003), Ghaderi & Scott(2001) Hong et al(2011). Choi et al(2010), 32.0%, 71.7%, 39.8%, 17.4%, 16.9%, 2.0%. Hong et al(2011) 73%, 95.8% 32.8%. (Nunez et al 1998, Kim & Lee 2006, Strong et al 2008),,,,. 1 33.3% 33.3%, 1 3 37.4%, 1 3 63.6% (p<)., 66.0%, 14.2%. 51.3%, 32.0% 18.2% (p<)., 73.4%, 7.8% 7.8%. 31.6%, 26.3% 15.8%, 30.0%, 19.0% 13.0%, 44.4%, 11.2%. 73.1%, 12.7%, 4.6%. Cho & Choi(2010),,,. TV (Cho & Choi 2010). Choi et al(2012) 2008 2011 2 37.3% 60.3% ( ), TV. 5 10 56.3%, 10 20 27.9%, 20 30 8.6%, 7.1% 30 (p<). 35.9%, 28.2%, 7.7.%, 28.6%, 19.7%, 15.0%, 9.1%,

56 9.1%, 9.1%, 9.1%.,. 3. Table 4.. 217 194. Choi et al(2010) Table 4. Health related habits of drinking Alcohol drinking Frequency of weekly drinking Begin drinking habit Motive for drinking Daily amount of alcohol drinking(soju) Reason of drinking Kind of alcohol Yes 50(96.2)1) 135(87.7) 9(81.8) 194(89.4) No 2( 3.8) 19(12.3) 2(18.2) 23(10.6) Everyday 1( 2.0) 7( 5.2) - 8( 4.1) 1 time/w 6(12.0) 26(19.3) 2(22.2) 34(17.5) 2 3 times/w 4( 8.0) 14(10.4) 1(11.1) 19( 9.8) 2 3 times/month 39(78.0) 88(65.2) 6(66.6) 133(68.6) Elementary school - 3( 2.2) - 3( 1.5) Middle school 5(10.0) 17(12.6) - 22(11.3) High school 15(30.0) 22(16.3) 4(44.4) 41(21.1) University 30(60.0) 93(68.9) 5(55.6) 128(66.1) Curiosity 13(26.0) 32(23.7) 4(44.4) 49(25.3) Stress 1( 2.0) 7( 5.2) - 8( 4.1) Admonition 2( 4.0) 14(10.4) 1(11.1) 17( 8.8) For show 1( 2.0) 1( 0.7) - 2( 1.0) From necessity 33(66.0) 81(60.0) 4(44.4) 118(60.8) 1/2 14(28.0) 39(28.9) 1(11.1) 54(27.8) 1/2 1 32(64.0) 75(55.5) 7(77.7) 114(58.8) 1 2 3( 6.0) 21(15.6) 1(11.1) 25(12.8) 3 1( 2.0) - - 1( 0.5) Habitually 2( 4.0) 13( 9.6) 1(11.1) 16( 8.2) Mental stability 3( 6.0) 6( 4.4) - 9( 4.6) Social relations 39(78.0) 92(68.1) 8(88.9) 139(71.6) Weight control - - - - Others 6(12.0) 24(17.8) - 30(15.5) Soju 20(40.0) 59(43.7) 4(44.4) 83(42.8) Beer 24(48.0) 73(54.1) 5(55.6) 102(52.6) Makgeolli 5(10.0) 3( 2.2) - 8( 4.1) Liquor 1( 2.0) - - 1( 0.5) Traditional liquor - - - - 2) 1) 2) N(%) : number of subjects, the relative % of subjects. : statistically no significant difference at p< by χ 2 -test.

25(1): 49 63 (2015) 57 33.8%, 1.8%,. 68.6% 2 3, 1 17.5%. 66.1%, 21.1%, 11.3%. 60.8%, 26.0% 23.7%, 11.1%. ( 4 5 ) 58.8%, ( 2 ) 27.8%, ( 6 8 ) 12.8%. 71.6%, 8.2%, 4.6%. 52.6%, 42.8%, 4.1%.. (2012), 1 (365 ) 7 ( 5 ), 5 ( 3 ) 2 17.5%, 2005 4.6%, 2010 7.4% 2012 7.9%. (Kromhout D 1983; Williamson et al 1987; Lee & Kim 1991),. (Shin et al 2009; Choi et al 2010),,. (Dallongeville et al 1998; Kim et al 2006; Shin & Choi 2014),. 4. Table 5. 63.5%, 50.0% 54.6%. 49.0%, 36.6% 54.4% (p<). Choi et al(2008),. Choi et al(2012) 2008 2 (35.2%), 2011 2 (32.4%), 2008 2011 2. 57.6% 6 8, 4 6 30.9%, 8 7.8%. 30.8%, 39.0% 18.2%. 44.9% 1 2, 30 1 41.0%. (2008 ), 20 29, 1 2 19.5%, 30 1 38.6%. Choi et al(2010) 12.3%, (61.2%). Choi et al (2012) 30 38%. 5. Table 6., 20 65.0%, 20 50 32.3%, 50 100 1.4%. 69.1%. 17.5%, 33.2%. Choi et al(2010) 3 27.7%, 3 15.9%. (Lee & Lee 1996)

58 Table 5. Health related habits of subjects Interest in health A key to health Daily the sleeping hours Exercise Frequency of exercise per week Duration of daily exercise Very often 33(63.5) 1) 77(50.0) 6(54.6) 116(53.5) Sometimes 18(34.6) 68(44.2) 5(45.5) 91(41.9) Almost never 1( 1.9) 9( 5.8) - 10( 4.6) A good rest & sleep 25(49.0) 41(28.3) 1( 9.1) 67(32.4) Regular exercise 14(27.5) 53(36.6) 6(54.5) 73(35.3) Regular meals & taking nutrition 12(23.5) 40(27.6) 3(27.3) 55(26.6) Prohibition of smoking & drinking - 1( 0.7) - 1( 0.5) Supplement intake - - - - Obesity measurement - 10( 6.9) 1( 9.1) 11( 5.3) > 4 hours 2( 3.8) 5( 3.2) 1( 9.1) 8( 3.7) 4 6 hours 13(25.0) 49(31.8) 5(45.5) 67(30.9) 6 8 hours 32(61.5) 88(57.1) 5(45.5) 125(57.6) > 8 hours 5( 9.6) 12( 7.8) - 17( 7.8) Yes 16(30.8) 60(39.0) 2(18.2) 78(35.9) No 36(69.2) 64(61.0) 9(81.8) 139(64.1) 1 2 times/w 8(50.0) 26(43.3) 1(50.0) 35(44.9) 3 times/w 6(37.5) 15(25.0) - 21(26.9) 4 5 times/w 1( 6.3) 16(26.7) 1(50.0) 18(23.1) Every day 1( 6.3) 3( 5.0) - 4( 5.1) 30 minutes 3(18.8) 11(18.3) 1(50.0) 15(19.2) 30 minutes 1 hour 9(56.2) 22(36.7) 1(50.0) 32(41.0) 1 hour hour 30 minutes 4(25.0) 20(33.3) - 24(30.8) 1 hour 30 minutes 2 hour - 7(11.7) - 7( 9.0) 2) 3) 1) 2) 3) N(%) : number of subjects, the relative % of subjects. : statistically no significant difference at p< by χ 2 -test. Significant at p< by χ 2 -test.,,,. 32.7%, 26.0% 36.4% 1 2. 22.6%, 36.4%. (Kim SH 1995, Ahn et al 2007, Choi et al 2010) 20.8%, 50 56%. 36.5%, 17.5% 27.3% (p<), 16.6%., 42.3%, 41.6% 45.5% (p<). 62.2%, 43.3%

25(1): 49 63 (2015) 59 Table 6. Eating habits of subjects < 20 33(63.5) 102(66.2) 6(54.5) 141(65.0) Food expenses ( 10 4 won) Type of food expenses consumption Time of meal Eat breakfast Overeating Eating out Snacking Unbalanced meals 20 50 17(32.7) 48(31.2) 4(45.5) 70(32.3) 50 100 2( 3.8) 1( 0.6) - 3( 1.4) 100-3( 1.9) - 3( 1.4) A homelike meal 8(15.4) 29(18.8) 2(18.2) 39(18.0) Eating out 38(73.1) 106(68.8) 6(54.5) 150(69.1) Meal delivery 2( 3.8) 3( 1.9) - 5( 2.3) Snack 4( 7.7) 16(10.4) 3(27.3) 23(10.6) Regularly 8(15.4) 29(18.8) 1( 9.1) 38(17.5) Sometimes 29(55.8) 73(47.4) 5(45.5) 107(49.3) Irregularly 15(28.8) 52(33.8) 5(45.5) 72(33.2) Every day 17(32.7) 33(21.4) 1( 9.1) 51(23.5) 5 6 times/w 3( 5.8) 19(12.3) 1( 9.1) 23(10.6) 3 4 times/w 9(17.3) 29(18.8) 1( 9.1) 39(18.0) 1 2 times/w 11(21.2) 40(26.0) 4(36.4) 55(25.3) Not at all 12(23.1) 33(21.4) 4(36.4) 49(22.6) Almost never 19(36.5) 27(17.5) 3(27.3) 49(22.6) Sometimes 26(50.0) 100(64.9) 6(54.5) 132(60.8) Often 7(13.5) 27(17.5) 2(18.2) 36(16.6) Korean food 11(21.2) 64(41.6) 3(27.3) 78(35.9) Western food 22(42.3) 42(27.3) 3(27.3) 67(30.9) Chinese food 18(34.6) 48(31.2) 5(45.5) 71(32.7) Fast food - - - - Others 1( 1.9) - - 1( 0.5) Almost never 8(15.4) 14( 9.1) 1( 9.1) 23(10.6) 1 time 30(57.7) 98(63.6) 7(63.6) 135(62.2) 2 times 10(19.2) 23(14.9) 2(18.2) 35(16.1) > 3 times 4( 7.7) 19(12.3) 1( 9.1) 24(11.1) Almost never 11(21.2) 21(13.6) - 32(14.7) Sometimes 16(30.8) 71(46.1) 4(36.4) 91(41.9) Often 25(48.1) 62(40.3) 7(63.6) 94(43.3) 2) 3) 1) 2) 3) N(%) : number of subjects, the relative % of subjects. : statistically no significant difference at p< by χ 2 -test. Significant at p< by χ 2 -test.. Choi et al(2012) 2008 2, 2011 2,,

60 2011 2,. 6. Table 7. 35.5%, 44.7%. Table 7. Mini dietary assessment in college women Milk & its products, daily Meat, fish, egg, soybean etc, every meal Kimchi, vegetables, every meal Fruits & other juices, daily Fried foods, more than 2 times per week High fat meat, more than 2 times per week Add more salt or soy source at meals 3 meals a day, regularly Ice cream, cake, cookies, carbonated drinks as snack, more than 2 times per week Variety of food (balanced diet) Very often 10(19.2) 1) 33(21.4) - 43(19.8) Sometimes 17(32.7) 57(37.0) 3(27.3) 77(35.5) Seldom 25(48.1) 64(41.6) 8(72.7) 97(44.7) Very often 21(40.4) 53(34.4) 2(18.2) 76(35.0) Sometimes 28(53.8) 82(53.2) 5(45.5) 115(53.0) Seldom 3( 5.8) 19(12.3) 4(36.4) 26(12.0) Very often 23(44.2) 63(40.9) 4(36.4) 90(41.5) Sometimes 22(42.3) 65(42.2) 5(45.5) 92(42.4) Seldom 7(13.5) 26(16.9) 2(18.2) 35(16.1) Very often 18(34.6) 45(29.2) 4(36.4) 67(30.9) Sometimes 24(46.2) 58(37.7) 2(18.2) 84(38.7) Seldom 10(19.2) 51(33.1) 5(45.5) 66(30.4) Very often 19(36.5) 67(43.5) 6(54.5) 92(42.4) Sometimes 30(57.7) 69(44.8) 1( 9.1) 100(46.1) Seldom 3( 5.8) 18(11.7) 4(36.4) 25(11.5) Very often 15(28.8) 38(24.7) 3(27.3) 56(25.8) Sometimes 24(46.2) 65(42.2) 3(27.3) 92(42.4) Seldom 13(25.0) 51(33.1) 5(45.5) 69(31.8) Very often 9(17.3) 20(13.0) - 29(13.4) Sometimes 24(46.2) 49(31.8) 3(27.3) 76(35.0) Seldom 19(36.5) 85(55.2) 8(72.7) 112(51.6) Very often 7(13.5) 28(18.2) 2(18.2) 37(17.1) Sometimes 22(42.3) 49(31.8) 1( 9.1) 72(33.2) Seldom 23(44.2) 77(50.0) 8(72.7) 108(49.8) Very often 20(38.5) 67(43.5) 3(27.3) 90(41.5) Sometimes 14(26.9) 59(38.3) 3(27.3) 76(35.0) Seldom 18(34.6) 28(18.2) 5(45.5) 51(23.5) Very often 27(51.9) 59(38.3) 6(54.5) 92(42.4) Sometimes 18(34.6) 76(49.4) 3(27.3) 97(44.7) Seldom 7(13.5) 19(12.3) 2(18.2) 28(12.9) 2) 3) 1) 2) 3) N(%) : number of subjects, the relative % of subjects. : statistically no significant difference at p< by χ 2 -test. Significant at p< by χ 2 -test.

25(1): 49 63 (2015) 61 83.9%, (1 ) (1 ) 69.6%. (,, ) 2 68.2%, 17.1%, (.) 87.1%. 40.4%, 34.4% 18.2% (p<). 2 36.5%, 43.5% 54.5%, (p<). 17.3% 13.0%, 72.7% (p<).,,, (, ) 2 38.5%, 43.5% 27.3%, 45.5% (p<). Choi et al(2012) 2011 2,,,, 2008,,. Shin & Choi (2014) (41.3%) ( 9.1%, 27.9%), (37.0%), (43.5%) (54.3%).,,. 1. 20.69,, 161.49 cm, 52.17 kg 20.01 kg/m 2. 2. 11.5%, 56.8%, 61.1%, 90.9% (p<). 52.8%, 35.0% 10.2%, 45.5%. 9 kg 81.8%, 3 5 kg 45.7% (p<). 3. (48.7%), 23.9%, 17.3%, 6.1%. 31.6%, 26.3% 15.8%, 44.4%, 11.2%. 4. 63.5%, 50.0% 54.6%. 49.0%, 36.6% 54.4% (p<). 5. 22.6%, 36.4%. 6. 40.4%, 34.4% 18.2% (p<). 2 (p<).,,.,,,.,

62. REFERENCES Ahn BRM, Park ES (2009) Perception of body weight control, life styles and dietary habits according to the obesity index (OI) of female college students. Korean J Human Eco 18: 167-179. Ahn MS, Chang IY, Kim KH (2007) Comparisons of UCP2 polymorphism, dietary habits, and obesity index in normal and obese university students. Korean J Food Culture 22: 404-413. Anuurad E, Shiwaku K, Nogi A, Kitajima K, Enkhmaa B, Shimono K, Yamane Y (2003) The new BMI criteria for asians by the regional office for the western pacific region of WHO are suitable for screening of overweight to prevent metabolic syndrome in elder Japanese workers. J Occup Health 45: 335-343. Cheong SH, Kwon WJ, Chang KJ (2002) A comparative study on the dietary attitudes, dietary behaviors and diet qualities of food and nutrition major and non-major female university student. Korean J Comm Nutr 7: 293-303. Cheong SH, Na YJ, Lee EH, Chang KJ (2007) Anthropometric measurement, dietary behaviors, health-related behaviors and nutrient intake according to lifestyles of college students. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 36: 1560-1570. Cho HS, Choi MK (2010) A study on body image and dietary habits by the body mass index of middle school students in Chungnam. Korean J Food & Nutr 23: 368-375. Cho IK (2003) A study on the female undergraduates concern for the weight-control and diet. MS Thesis Yong-in Uni. Yongin Cho KJ, Kang HJ (2004) A study on the food habits and dietary intakes of university students in Busan area. J Korean Society Food Culture 19: 70-82. Choi KS, Shin KO, Chung KH (2008) Comparison of the dietary pattern, nutrient intakes, and blood parameters according to body mass index(bmi) of college women in Seoul area. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 37: 1589-1598. Choi KS, Shin KO, Huh SM, Chung KH (2010) Comparison of nutritional and physical status according to the residental type among college women in Seoul Women's University and Sahmyook University. Korean J Nutr 43: 86-96. Choi KS, Shin KO, Chung KH (2012) Dietary habits, nutrition status, and health of female students. Korea J Food & Nutr 25: 719-728. Chyun JH, Woo KJ, Choe EO (2000) A study on obesity rate and self-evaluated body shape of woman living in Inchon. Korean J Dietary Culture 15: 361-367. Dallongeville J, Marecaux N, Fruchart JC, Amouyel P (1998) Cigarette smoking is associated with unhealthy patterns of nutrient intake: A meta-analysis. J Nutr 128: 1450-1457. Ghaderi A, Scott B (2001) Prevalence, incidence and prospective risk factors for eating disorders. Acta Psychatr Scand 104: 122-130. Hong MS, Pak HO, Sohn CY (2011) A study on food behaviors and nutrient intakes according to body mass index and body image recognition in female university students from Incheon. Korean J Food & Nutr 24: 386-395. Ju MJ, Shin YJ, Kim YH (2013) A study on body awareness and dietary life of adults who perform regular exercise. J Nutr Health 46: 461-469. Kim HY, Kim JH (2005) Food habits and nutrition knowledge of college students residing in the dormitory in Ulsan area. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 34: 1388-1397. Kim KY (2008) Effects of body mass index on eating disorder in college female. Korea J Sports Sci 17: 89-96. Kim KY, Ahn GJ, Kim KW (2004) Analysis of dietary habit, eating disorder and needs for nutrition education programs by weight control attempts among female college students. J Korean Soc for Study of Obesity 13: 248-257. Kim MH, Bae YJ, Sung CJ (2006) A evaluation study on nutrient intake and diet quality of male college students according to pack-year in Korea. Korea J Nutr 39: 572-584. Kim MK, Lee GC (2006) Weight reduction dieting survey and satisfaction degree and diet related knowledge among adult women by age. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 35: 572-582. Kim MO, Eun JG, Chang UJ (2009) Recognition of body weight and body part satisfaction in female college students. Korean J Food & Nutr 22: 205-214. Kim SH (1995) Dietary patterns of university female students in Kongju city: Comparisons among subgroups devided by residence type. Korean J Nutr 28: 653-674. Kim WY, Cho MS, Lee HS (2003) Development and validation of mini dietary assessment index for Koreans. Korean J Nutr 36: 83-92. Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey (2012) Ministry of Health and Welfare.

25(1): 49 63 (2015) 63 Korean Statistical Information Service(KOSIS) (2008) Korea. Korean statistical information service(kosis) (2012) Korea. Kromhout D (1983) Energy and macronutrient intake in lean and obese middle-aged men (the Zutphen study). Am J Clin Nutr 37: 295-299. Lee BS, Lee YS (1996) A study on the nutrient intake and eating behaviors of the 3 groups. Korean J Food & Nutr 9: 441-446. Lee HC, Choi JM, Son LS, Song JI (1997) A study on the body fatness and lifestyles of university students. J Korean Soc for Study of Obesity 6: 169-184. Lee HJ, Choi MR, Koo JO (2005) A study of body image, weight control and dietary habits with different BMI in female high school students. Korean J Comm Nutr 10: 805-813. Lee JE, Park HR (2003) Body-related attitude, self-esteem and eating attitude in undergraduate students. J Korean Acad Psych Mental Health Nurs 12: 602-611. Lee SH, Chang (2007) Effectiveness of nutrition education on dietary habits and diet quality in the weight loss and weight gain groups in college women. Korean J Nutr 40: 463-474. Lee SH, Kim WY (1991) Relationship of habitual alcohol consumption to the nutritional status in middle aged men. Korean J Nutr 24: 58-65. Lim JY, Rha HB (2007) Weight control and associated factors among health-related major female college students in Seoul. Korean J Comm Nutr 12: 247-258. Nam JH, Lee SJ, Kim HJ (2014) Correlation of earing disorders on BMI of college women in Gyeong-gi province. Korea J Food & Nutr 27: 80-88. Nunez C, Carbajal A, Moreiras O (1998) Body mass index and desire of weight loss in a group of young women. Nutr Hosp 13: 172-176. Pak SJ, Son CN (2002) The effects of cognitive behavior therapy on body image esteem, self-esteem, and depression of college women with negative body image. Korean J Health Psychology 7: 335-351. Rhee JH (2007) A study on effects of somatotypes and stress on body cathexis and preferences of clothing image. J Costume Culture 15: 1084-1099. Shin KO, An CH, Hwang HJ, Choi KS, Chung KH (2009) Effect of smoking and drinking habits on the nutrient in- takes and health of middle and high school boy students. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 38: 694-708. Shin KO, Choi KS (2014) A study on the health status, and nutrient intakes according to body mass index of college men in Seoul area. Korean J Food & Nutr 27: 507-521. Shin KO, Chung KH (2010) Comparative study of dietary habits, mini dietary assessment scores, and health interest between female students in the department of food and nutrition and other departments, Sahmyook University. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 20: 341-351. Strong KA, Parks SL, Anderson E, Winett R, Davy BM (2008) Weight gain prevention: identifying theory-based targets for health behavior change in young adults. J Am Diet Assoc 108: 1708-1715. Sung MH (2005) Relationship among eating disorders, physical symptoms and self-esteem among college women. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health 9: 155-166. The Korean Nutrition Society (2010) Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. Seoul, Korea. p 21. Williamson DF, Forman MR, Binkin NJ, Gentry EM, Remington PL, Trowbridge FL (1987) Alcohol and body weight in United States adults. Am J Public Health 77: 1324-1330. World Health Organization (2000) Obesity. Preventing and Ma- naging the Global Endemic. WHO Technical Report Series no 894. WHO, Geneva. Yoon GA (2004) The relation of educational level and life-style behaviors to obesity in adult males. Korean J Nutr 37: 385-393. Yoon HS (2006) An assessment on the dietary attitudes, stress level and nutrient intakes by food record of food and nutri- tion major female university students. Korean J Nutr 39: 145-159. Yu CH, Lee JS (2004) A study on the nutritional status accor- ding to body mass index in Korean college women. Korean J Nutr 37: 899-907. Yu HH, Nam JE, Kim IS (2003) A study of the nutritional intake and health condition of female college students as related to their frequency of eating breakfast. Korean J Comm Nutr 8: 964-976. Date Received Date Revised Date Accepted Dec. 8, 2014 Feb. 27, 2015 Feb. 28, 2015