1 1 Asia n Journa l of Education 2000, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 151-169. ( ) * 1).,.,.,,,.,.. 17,., *
152 1 1. A X,. X A X A.,...,., (false consciousness)..,..,? (modus vivendi),.,.,.,,..,.,,.,,
153..,.. II...,. (A. J. Simmons, 1979).,,.... (natural duty).,.?.,.,,.,..
154 1 1..,,.., A, - A, A -., A. (express consent).,.., 1). A, A..., (hypothetical consent). (original position).. A,.,,.,,, 1) (1979) receive accept. receive, accept. receive, accept,.
155 (market failure) (public goods) (, 1994).. A?., A. A.. (suum cuique), A. (justice as fairness). (principle of gratitude).,.. A?,.,. (J. Rawls, 1971),..,.,. (voluntariness),,..,, (counter- factuality). (D. Hume), X X.
156 1 1,. III...,.. A B.,.,....,.,..!,,....,... A, A.,
157.,.?.,..,.,,,...?.....,,,,...?,....
158 1 1,.,,. (Max Weber),,.,.,..,.,.,....,,..,, (political hedonism). (teleological theory).,, (rational choice)..
159.,,. (R. Nozick. 1974)....,..,....,,,..,,.,,,,..,.
160 1 1. A A...,.,. 2)... IV.,,,.,..,.,,.,,.. 2),. (Leviathan)..
161...,,,. (natural duty),,.,,,,.,,.,.,. A,.., (M. Walzer, 1983) (M. Sandel, 1982),.,..,.,.,. A
162 1 1,. A, A,, (heavenly lottery system).!.,.,.,,..,,,..,.....,,.,...,, (L. Strauss, 1953)
163 (political hedonist)..,.,.,,.,,.,. V... (pure procedural justice) (perfect procedural justice)..,.,,.,.
164 1 1,...,.. (morally permissible). (J. Locke). (jus naturale)..,..,,...,. A B C. A C B,.,...
165 (prima facie obligation). A,,..,..,,.,...,,. A. C,.,.,.,. VI.,
166 1 1...,.,..,.?..,..... ( )...,.?...,,,...., (deliberative democracy).
167, ( )... (J. S. Mill) (, 1995)., (aggregative democracy) (deliberative democracy), (grassroot democracy),...,,.,,..,....,.,...
168 1 1,, ( ). ( ),,...,,. (1997).. :. (1995).. :. (1994). II. :. Milgram. S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper and Row. Nozick. R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Sandel. M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Simmons, A. (1979). Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Strauss, L. (1953). Natural right and history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books. Wolin. S. (1986). Contract and birthright. Political Theory 14. 2(May), pp. 179-193. * 7 10 / 1 7 13 / 2 7 20 *.. e-mai l : parkp@snu.ac.kr
169 Abstra c t The possibi l i t ies and l imi ts of consent theor ies as a j ust i ficat ion for pol i t ical obl igat ion Par k, Hyo-Chong * 3) This research is an at tempt to examine the possibi l i t ies and l imi ts of consent as a potent ground of political obligation in a critical way. The consent theories have a moral superiority compar ison wi th social contract theor ies and ut i l i tar ianism. Their maj or strength is to demonstrate t a ci t izen has a duty to bind to onesel f to obey to pol i t ical author ity, as we bind our selves to obey promising. Nevertheless, this research calls into question the validity of consent theories by arg that consent is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for a just ificat ion polit ical obligat ion we do not regard consent merely as a potential ground of authority, it is important to note the fac that consent has other functions as well. The educative and communicative functions of consent are important values that have implications for citizenship education in democratic society. This is the state which governs with the consent of its citizens is better than the one which does not. * Department of National Ethics Education, Seoul National University