:,, * - - 1) 2 ) 3 ) 4 ) 5 ) 6 ) 7 ) 8 ) 3 ) 9 ) 2 ) 10 )., (, 1995;, 1994)., (,,,,, 1998). (, 1997),.. (, 1992).. (,, 1998;,,,,, 1995).....,.. (, 1995;, 1997;,,,, 1998;,, 1993) *. 1) 6) (hlkim @chungnam.ac.kr ) 2) (jm @roebuck.halla - c.ac.kr ) 7) 3) 8) 4) (eskim @g shp.g snu.ac.kr ) 9) 5) (soonkhim @chollian.net ) 10) (lamia @nuri.net ) - 1233 -
,. (, 1995)..,...,.. II. 1..,., (, 1994). (, 1994;, 1985). (, 1995). 2 66.3% 3 12.2% 1960 (, 1992). 1991 17% (, 1994). (1995), 40... (, 1997;, 1993). (1994), (42.7%), (22.3%), (21.4%)..,,.,., Simonton (1987) Houlihan (1987), Pratt, Schmall, Wright (1985) Wilson (1995). - 1234 -
29 6 (1992),,.,,. (1995),,,,,. Prunchno Potashnik(1989),,, (1998)., (1995),,.,.. (Hermeneutical Circle) (, 1992; Bontekoe, 1996). (Friedrich Schleiermacher), (Friedrich Ast).. (Bontecoe, 1996).,. 2. (interpretation- distanciation). (Bontecoe, 1996). 2... (, 1998b; Bontekoe, 1996; Gadamer, 1989).,....... - (Gadamer, 1989). (, 1992; Allen and Louise, 1990). - 1235 -
,,,,,,.... (narrative) (Ricoeur, 1984). ( ). 3... (Mishler, 1986)... (syntax), (semantic), (pragmatic) (Mishler, 1986). Diekelman. (, 1998).,,,,,, ; 6 (Diekelman, Allen, T anner, 1989) 2, 3, ; 4, - 5, 6,. III. 1.. 13. 6, 2, 1, 1, 1 2. 35 60 3-7. 12, 1, 68 84.. 2.... 1... 1998 1 10 3-4. 3. 1, - 1236 -
29 6.. Diekelman (1989) 6. 1 10.,......... 1. ( ).......,..., hospi ce care........,... TV,.,. ( ).......,...,..,,,.... - 1237 -
.......... ( )... hospice care......., ( ).... 2..., (, 1994). (, 1993).,..,,..... 10,.......... (, 1995).,.. 20, 20-1238 -
29 6..,. 3. (, 1995)....,................ ( )... (, 1992).,,,....... 4.. (, 1993;, 1995).,,.,,.,?........,,., - 1239 -
.,,.. 5.,,,,,, - - (, 1995).. 20,.,..,.,,..,.... 6........,...................,........ - 1240 -
29 6. (, 1993).... (, 1995)..,.,.... V... 13.,,,,,...........,.,.,. (1994).. (1995).,. (1992). -,, 35-70 - 1241 -
, (1998)., 28(4), 1047-1059. (1993).,. (1995)., (1998).,, 1 (1997)., (1992).,. (1994). : -,, (1995).,, 9(1), 94-105. (1985).,,., (1993).,.,,, (1998).,,, (1992). (1990-2021). (1992).,. (1998)., 1 (1998.2.9-2.14),.,,,, (1995).,, 20(3), 448-58. Allen, M. N., Louise, J. (1990). Hermeneutical Inquiry- Meanin g and Scope, Western Journal of Nursing Research. 12(2), 241-253. Bontekoe, R. (1996), Dimensions of the hermeneutic circle, Humanistic Press(New Jersey), Diekelmann, N., Allen, D., & T anner, C. (1989). A Hermaneutic Analysis of the NLN Criteria of the Appraisal of Baccalaureate Programs. In The NLN Criteria for Appraisal of Baccalaureate Programs : A Critical Hermeneutic Analysis, National League of Nursing (Pub. No.15-2253), 3-34. Gadamer, H. (1989). Truth and Method, Crossroad Publishing (New York), Houlihan, J. P. (1987). Famlies Caring for frail and demented elderly : A Review of selected finding, F amily Sy stem s Medicine, 5, 344-356 Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research Interviewing - Context and Narrative, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Prunchno, R. A., & Potashnik, S. L. (1989). Caregiving spouses : Physical and mental health in perspective. J. Am. Geriatric Society, 37, 697-705. Pratt C., Schmall, V., & Wright, S. (1987). Ethical concerns of family caregivers to dementi patients, Gerontologist, 27(5), 632-638. Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and Narrative, 3 vols., translated by Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Sim onton (1987). A ssessing care giver inform ation need : A brief questionnaire, Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 10(2), 177-180. Wilson, H. S. (1995). Family caregiving for a relative with alzheimer 's dementia : coping with negative choice, Nursing Research, 38(2), 94-98 - 1242 -
29 6 -Abstract - Key concept : Hermeneutic research, Dementia, Lives of daughters -in- law The Lives of Daughter s- in-law Who Car e for Par ent s wi th Dement ia Kang, Hyun Sook 1) Go, Keum Ja 2 ) Kim, Won Ock 3 ) Kim, Eun Sim 4 ) Khim, Soon-Yong 5 ) Kim, Hyun Li 6 ) Shin, Soon Ok 7 ) Oh, Sang Eun 8 ) Won, Jeong Sook 3 ) Li, Chun Yu 9 ) Jung, Min 2 ) Choe, Nam Hee 10 ) T his study w as done to investig ate the lives of the daughters- in - law caring for parents w ith dementia and participate in their lives through having quality time w ith them. Data w ere collected by depth interview s and interpreted through the hermeneutic circle as follow s. T hese daughters - in - law have conflict betw een social custom and subjective self. T hey had ambiv alence tow ard their demented partents- in - law and w ere fighting a battle betw een rationality and em otions in their mind. T hese daughters- in law and m others- in - law did not get along and the parents ' dementia aggrav ated the relationships. T hey w ere alienated from their family by the parents w ith dem entia. T he indifference of their family especially their husbands, m ade these subjects live in misery. T hey cared for the demented m other- in - law w ith hatred. Even though they had this yoke, there daughtersin- law were not able to throw off the shackles of convention. 1) Departm ent of Nur sing, Kyung Hee Univer sity 2) Cheju H alla College 3) Kyung Hee School of Nur sing 4) College of Medicine, Gyeong Sang National University 5) College of Nur sing Korea Univer sity 6) Chungnam n ation al univ ersity 7) Young Dong College 8) Chonn am Nation al Univer sity 9) Yanbian Medical College 10) Seoul W omen ' s College of Nursing - 1243 -