,,, (, 2001: 11-37),,, 4-5 213 19995 1-3
1 ) 2000 39 131 2 ) 2001 10 % ( ),,,, 1),,,, 2) 3) 4),,,, 200193 0 36, 117 117 L i k e r t5 ( 1 =, 3=, 5= ), 1) 28, 1 3 ( ) 2),, (, 2000: 25-26)
1999,,,, 3 ) ( 1999 ) (NPM), (TQM), (Knowledge-Based Management) ( 1999 a ) (, 1999: 63-65), (2000),, (, 2000: 22-2 4 ), (1999b: 27-28),, ( 1999 : 64-67 ),,, (2000: 269) 6,, ( 2000 ) 3) (1999), (1999a), (2000), (2000), (2000a/2000b), (2000)
, (, 2000: 117-121),,,,, ( ),,, ( 41-3) 14 1 10 1,, ( 44-5 5), 5, 50% 2 3 1
1 1,,, reference checking ( 6) ( ) ( 1 ) 7 4 ( ), (, ) ( ) 1 ( ) :, : 3 ( 7 9) (,, ),,
,,, <1 > <1 > (+) 4 ) (-), 36 117 2001 9, 6 8 8 5,,, 1, 200, 750 20019 20011 0 <2 > 4),,,,
117 <3 >, 1 23, 16, 0,
13 28, 31, 4, 27, 2 97 10 01, 46, 0, 46, 7 98, 24 57, 12, 61,,, 1 117 52 %6 0 2 28 %( 33 ), 3 17 %( 4 ), 4 3 %( 4 ) 4 32 23 2 54, 1 78 0 26 7 10 117 15 24 117, 51(436%) 1,
( - ),, 10 1 8, 11-15 2 6, 16-20 2 8 21 1 3 16-20 10 2 7, 11-151 8, 16-201 6, 21 1 5 ( ) ( ) (r ) 219 208 05 6 <6 > ( 5 362 360), ( 5 302 313),, DB,,,
117 4, 113 5 ) 7 04 7 1 13 67 2 %7 6 4 43, 4 59 2 %6 7 12 6 ), 117 4 1 36 3 %, 5),,,,, 5 6),,,,
11 2 %, 14 6 % 7) 8 <9 > ( 5 339-370),, ( 31 1 %) ( 25 3 %) ( 5 291),,, 7)
51 4 65 0 342%, 515 5 32 5 %, 566 0 171%, 414 5 13 7 % 61 2 1 7 %, 40 1 38 5 %, 342% 15 4 % 2 117 1 03 88 0 %, 1 4 12 0 % 8 ) 5,,, 4, 3 12 (103%), 2 3 2 (17%), 29 1 (777%), 2 12 ( 10 3 %) 3, 91 2, 117 24 2 77 65 8 %, 40 34 2 % 40 14 26 117 39 3 %4 6, 607% 71, 3 0 25 6 %, 20004, 8),,,, 4,, 3,,,,,
, ( ) 130 %,,,, 200193 0 40, 1 76, 554, 2 70, 983, 3 61, 283 1 20, 000 9 ) 40 123 8 % 26 121 7 %, 14 127 9 % 62% 10 ) ( ) 1 23 8 %( 1279%), 122 9 %( 1259%) <1 1 > 8,,,, ( 5 323-351),, ( 303-311) 9) 200193 0 19, ( 1), ( 2), ( 1 ) 10), 80% 50 %
<1 2 > 6, ( 5 334, 350 336), ( 301), ( 312)
<1 3 >,,,,, 01 12 ) 5 ( 379) ( 326 3 25) ( 319), 3 11 3 00,,,, 11) 5 8854 5, 5 12),,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( <14> ) ( 46 0), ( 39 7), ( 39 0), ( 36 0), 4, 3 5, 3, 17,,,,,,,,,, 13, (- 100), (- 64), (- 55 4),,,, 168, ( + 40 3), ( + 35) 1 5 1,
, 39 12,,,,, 12,,,,,, 4 36 ( 14), ( 10 25), ( 7 57), ( 7 00), ( 6 50) ( 9 25), ( 3 0 ), ( 4 33), ( 6 43), ( 5 50), ( 10 0), ( 5 50), ( 4 00) 9 ( 0 17), ( 1 33), ( 0 50), ( 0 57), ( 0 20), ( 0 75), ( 12 0), ( 0 29), ( 0 67), 10, 1 3,,,,, 0 5,,, 3, 5 1 3 6, 5 3, 3 2, 4 1,,,,,,,, 6 338, 0 26 13 ) 3 38 1 026,,,, 1,,,, -042, -114-138, 13) 6 903
< 15 > 6, ( 89 %), (86%), (80%), 50 % 57 %, (40%), (33%), ( 32 %) 7, 4 1, 2, 1 2 11, 19 D B 11, D B 4 0, 3 7, 3 0 8, 1 0 0 7,,, (Reference Checking) 6 9,,, 4 4 3, 9,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 8 350, 0 30, 14 ) 1,,,, 1
,, ( 2 86 ) 014, -146 14) 8 9429
< 16 > 9, 4 3, 7 4,,,, 5 1,,, 4, 1 24 40 4, 7 5, 4 3, 5 3 3 2, 2 75,,, 2 50 2 5 1 0,,, 2,,,, 10, 119, 79, 73 5, 60 0, ( 11 ), ( 22 ), ( 54 ), ( 32 ), ( 32 ), ( 32 ), ( 53 ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 18
,,, 4 4 15 ),,,,, 8 325, 0 19 16 ) 1,,,,,, 1,,, ( 2 89 ), -062-107 15 ), 16) 8 8827
<1 6 > 5 324, 34,,,,,,,,,,,, <1 7 >,, 520, 589, 494,,,,,, - 465 01, - 351 05 (-),,,,,
17 ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 17),
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (reference checking),,,,
2, 34 2 %,,,,,,,, ( m e n t o r ),,,
,, (2000), 68: 48-55 (2000), 49(564): 39-47 (2000), : (2000) 2000 (1999), 33(4): 5 7-7 5 (2000) ( ), 38(2): 253-272 (2000), : (2000), 49(564): 23-31 (2001) CSC, 2001-6 (2000) KIPA ( ), 99-07 (1999) ( 1999 ), 23-37 (2000), 49(564): 15-22 (1999) (1999), : 10-15 (2000) CSC, 2000-3 (1999a) : (1999) :, : 20-31 (2000) (2000), 49(564): 32-38 Harper, Kirke (1992) The Senior Executive Service after One Year In Patricia W Ingraham and David H Rosenbloom(eds), The Promise and Paradox of Civil Service Reform, 267-282 Pittsburgh: University of
P i t t s b u r g h Ingraham, Patricia W, Helen Murlis, and B Guy Peters (1999) The State of the Higher Civil Service after R e f o r m Paris: OECD LeBleu, Ronald and Roger Sobkowiak (1995) New Workforce Competency Models Information Systems M a n a g e m e n t 12(3): 7-12 Mirabile, Richard J(1997) Everything You Wanted to Know about Competency Modeling Training & D e v e l o p m e n t 51(8): 73-77 Zifcak, Spencer (1994) New Managerialism: Administrative Reform in Whitehall and Canberra B u c k i n g h a m, Open University Press Http://wwwopmgov/ses/ Us Office of Personnel Management SES Http://wwwcabinet-officegov/uk/civilservice/ SCS Http://wwwsscgovtnz/ (State Service Commission) Http://wwwoecdorg/puma/OECD Http://wwwpsmpcgovau/ (Public Service and Merit Protection C o m m i s s i o n ) Washington State University,,,, (, 2001), (, 1996), (, 2000), (chpark@mjuackr) Univ of Pittsburgh,,,,, 2 (,1998), (, 1998), (,, 2002) (keunnk@plaza1suntackr) Temple University,,,, (, 1998), (, 2000),, ( h b p a r k @ r o a d d a e j i n a c k r ),,,,, (oh@sangmyungackr) Michigan State University,,,,, (1996), : (1998), (1999) ( s m o o k @ s n u t a c k r )