Kinematic analysis of success strategy of YANG Hak Seon technique Joo-Ho Song 1, Jong-Hoon Park 2, & Jin-Sun Kim 3 * 1 Korea Institute of Sport Scienc

Similar documents
Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ


<353420B1C7B9CCB6F52DC1F5B0ADC7F6BDC7C0BB20C0CCBFEBC7D120BEC6B5BFB1B3C0B0C7C1B7CEB1D7B7A52E687770>


The characteristic analysis of winners and losers in curling: Focused on shot type, shot accuracy, blank end and average score SungGeon Park 1 & Soowo

iii

012임수진

< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>

Effects of resistance training method on body composition, isokinetic strength and endurance, cardiopulmonary function, anaerobic power in female judo

Lumbar spine

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

스포츠과학 143호 내지.indd

<333320BCD5C1F6C8C62DB4EBC7D020BFA4B8AEC6AE20C4ABB3AAB5F0BEF020BCB1BCF6B5E92E687770>

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Sep.; 30(9),

<C8ADB7C220C5E4C3EBC0E52E687770>

머 리 말 우리 나라에서 한때 가장 인기가 있었던 직업은 은행원이었다 년대만 하더라도 대학 졸업을 앞둔 학생들은 공사 公 社 와 더불어 은행 을 가장 안정적인 직장으로 선망했다 그러나 세월은 흘러 구조조정이 상시화된 지금 은행원 은 더이상 안정도 순위의 직업이 아니다

(

03이경미(237~248)ok


시작하기 시작할 준비가 되었으면 다음 설명에 따라 설문조사를 실시한다. 1단계: 허락받기 클럽을 떠나는 회원에게 에 응해 줄 것인지 물어본다. 이 설문 조사는 클럽의 문제점을 보완해 향후 같은 이유로 이탈하는 회원들이 없도록 하기 위한 것이며, 응답 내용은 대외비로 처

005송영일

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

12이문규


09È«¼®¿µ 5~152s

1..

Theoretical foundation for the ethics of coaching sport Sungjoo Park* Kookmin University [Purpose] [Methods] [Results] [Conclusions] Key words:

1. 연구 개요 q 2013년 연구목표 제2-1과제명 건축물의 건강친화형 관리 및 구법 기술 연구목표 건강건축 수명예측 Lifecycle Health Assessment (LHA) 모델 개발 건축물의 비용 기반 분석기술(Cost-based Lifecycle Health

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

歯기구학

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Dec.; 27(12),



Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc


THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Jun.; 27(6),

< BEC7BFECC1F62E687770>

08.hwp

433대지05박창용

KARAAUTO_4¿ù.qxd-ÀÌÆå.ps, page Normalize

주지스님의 이 달의 법문 성철 큰스님 기념관 불사를 회향하면서 20여 년 전 성철 큰스님 사리탑을 건립하려고 중국 석굴답사 연구팀을 따라 중국 불교성지를 탐방하였습 니다. 대동의 운강석굴, 용문석굴, 공의석굴, 맥적산석 굴, 대족석굴, 티벳 라싸의 포탈라궁과 주변의 큰

목 록( 目 錄 )

03-1영역형( )

02-1기록도전( )

04조남훈

<31342DC0CCBFEBBDC42E687770>

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Jul.; 27(7),

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

A study on the sports educational zeal through the qualitative network analysis: Focusing on mothers of student athletes Byung-Goo Lee & Han-Joo Lee*

???? 1

,. 3D 2D 3D. 3D. 3D.. 3D 90. Ross. Ross [1]. T. Okino MTD(modified time difference) [2], Y. Matsumoto (motion parallax) [3]. [4], [5,6,7,8] D/3

< C6AFC1FD28B1C7C7F5C1DF292E687770>

14.531~539(08-037).fm

국문요약 한국 중 근세사회의 농법과 수리시설의 변화, 발달과정 등을 문헌 자료 검토와 발굴 보고서 분석을 통해 정리하였다. 고려시대의 경지이용방식은 文宗代 田品 규정에서 볼 때 1년 또는 2년 休閑法이었다. 벼 경작법이 고려말에 이르러 休閑法에서 連作法으로 변화 발전하


차례.hwp

<35BFCFBCBA2E687770>


달생산이 초산모 분만시간에 미치는 영향 Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 達 은 23) 의 丹 溪 에 최초로 기 재된 처방으로, 에 복용하면 한 다하여 난산의 예방과 및, 등에 널리 활용되어 왔다. 達 은 이 毒 하고 는 甘 苦 하여 氣, 氣 寬,, 結 의 효능이 있

139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ

전립선암발생률추정과관련요인분석 : The Korean Cancer Prevention Study-II (KCPS-II)

methods.hwp

???춍??숏

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

03 장태헌.hwp

~ Fig. 1. The standard of competition basketball wheelchair (Lim, 2003)

Microsoft Word - KSR2012A021.doc

45-51 ¹Ú¼ø¸¸


<35335FBCDBC7D1C1A42DB8E2B8AEBDBAC5CDC0C720C0FCB1E2C0FB20C6AFBCBA20BAD0BCAE2E687770>

590호(01-11)

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

À±½Â¿í Ãâ·Â

산선생의 집입니다. 환영해요

融合先验信息到三维重建 组会报 告[2]

시안

<C1A63534C8B820BCBCB9CCB3AA2DC6EDC1FD2E687770>

The Gaze Behavior and Defense Motion of National Hokey Goalkeeper in Field Hokey Penalty Coner and Stroke Task Seungmin Lee 1, Sang-Cheol Lee 2 *, Jon

歯14.양돈규.hwp

10(3)-09.fm

Research subject change trend analysis of Journal of Educational Information and Media Studies : Network text analysis of the last 20 years * The obje

¸Þ´º¾ó-ÀÛ¾÷5

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

2014_ pdf

<352E20BAAFBCF6BCB1C5C320B1E2B9FDC0BB20C0CCBFEBC7D120C7D1B1B920C7C1B7CEBEDFB1B8C0C720B5E6C1A1B0FA20BDC7C1A120BCB3B8ED D2DB1E8C7F5C1D62E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

03-ÀÌÁ¦Çö

서론 34 2

DWCOM15/17_manual

<BCADBFEFC1F6B9E6BAAFC8A3BBE7C8B85FBAAFC8A3BBE72DC8B8BFF8BFACB1B8B3EDB9AEC6C7B7CABFACB1B C1FD295FB3BBC1F62E687770>

hwp

<31372DB9DABAB4C8A32E687770>

: 4 2. : (KSVD) 4 3. :

서울대 뉴스레터 1018

Transcription:

Kinematic analysis of success strategy of technique JooHo Song 1, JongHoon Park 2, & JinSun Kim 3 * 1 Korea Institute of Sport Science, 2 Catholic Kwandong University, 3 Yonsei University [Purpose] [Methods] [Results] [Conclusions] Key words:

Table 1. Characteristics of subjects Subject Height (cm) Weight (kg) Age (yrs) YHS 159.9 52.3 27 S1 166.8 61.1 28 S2 167.3 66.6 27 S3 171.9 65.0 23 S4 165.2 62.7 23 166.2(4.3) 61.5(5.6) 25.6(2.4)

Fig. 1. Layout of camera and control point installation (Song et al., 2016) Fig. 2. Events and phases of and techniques (Song, 2017)

Fig. 3. Definition of angles (Song, 2017) Table 2. Phase time (unit: sec) BC PrF HC PoF PoF Asc 0.10 (0.01) 0.11 (0.01) 0.14 (0.02) 1.05 (0.03) 0.41 (0.03) PoF Des 0.64 (0.01) Vaulting time 1.41 (0.01) S1 0.11 0.15 0.14 1.14 0.40 0.74 1.66 S2 0.10 0.10 0.17 1.21 0.42 0.79 1.58 S3 0.10 0.12 0.18 1.05 0.38 0.67 1.45 S4 0.10 0.13 0.15 1.10 0.42 0.68 1.48 0.10 0.13 (0.02) 0.16 (0.02) 1.13 (0.06) 0.41 (0.02) 0.72 (0.05) 1.54 (0.08)

Table 3. Horizontal and vertical displacements of the center of mass (unit: m) Horizontal BTD BTO HTD HTO Peak 0.0 0.6 1.2 1.8 3.0 LD 5.0 Displacement PrF 0.6 PoF 3.3 Vertical BTD BTO HTD HTO Peak LD 0.9 1.1 1.6 2.1 3.0 1.0 Displacement S1 0.0 0.7 1.6 2.1 3.6 6.3 0.9 4.1 1.0 1.2 1.7 2.3 3.1 0.9 0.9 2.3 S2 0.0 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.8 4.8 0.6 3.1 1.0 1.1 1.5 2.1 3.0 0.5 1.0 2.6 S3 0.0 0.5 1.1 1.7 2.8 4.6 0.6 2.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.1 0.9 0.8 2.2 S4 0.0 0.7 1.4 1.9 3.2 5.3 0.7 3.4 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.2 3.0 0.7 0.9 2.3 0.0 0.7 1.3 1.9 3.1 (0.4) 5.3 (0.8) 0.7 3.4 (0.5) 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.2 3.0 0.7 PoF Asc 0.9 0.9 PoF Des 2.0 2.4 Table 4. Horizontal and vertical velocities of the center of mass (unit: m/s) Horizontal BC HC PoF BTD BTO V HTD HTO V 7.7 5.3 2.4 5.0 2.9 (0.3) 2.1 (0.3) 3.1 Vertical BTD BTO HTD HTO LD 0.1 (0.3) 4.0 3.7 3.9 S1 7.6 5.7 1.9 5.5 3.2 2.3 3.6 0.1 3.4 3.0 3.9 3.4 S2 7.5 5.5 2.0 5.0 2.1 2.9 2.5 0.5 3.2 3.3 4.3 1.7 S3 7.2 4.8 2.4 4.4 2.4 2.0 2.8 0.3 3.6 3.0 3.7 5.4 S4 7.8 5.5 2.3 4.9 2.9 2.0 3.1 0.4 3.2 3.4 3.9 2.7 7.5 5.4 (0.4) 2.2 5.0 (0.5) 2.7 (0.5) 2.3 (0.4) 3.0 (0.5) 0.3 3.4 3.2 4.0 (0.3) 5.3 (0.3) 3.3 (1.4)

Table 5. Change in hip, knee and shoulder joint angles (unit: ) Hip Knee Shou lder BTD BTO HTD HTO Peak LD 109.1 (6.1) 143.5 (8.7) 186.9 (8.2) 188.8 185.5 181.6 (12.0) (12.0) (14.6) S1 105.3 170.2 227.2 211.2 188.1 95.4 S2 117.8 159.4 196.8 196.6 187.0 108.7 S3 116.0 154.3 214.2 191.8 159.6 127.1 S4 111.2 145.7 190.3 204.8 175.8 134.9 112.6 (5.6) 147.3 (3.0) 157.4 207.1 201.1 (10.2) (16.8) (8.6) 168.1 (3.3) 168.8 (5.4) 173.3 (2.6) 177.6 116.5 (13.2) (17.9) 171.5 (2.3) 134.9 (14.8) S1 148.7 177.2 160.7 171 172.6 124.7 S2 158.8 169.7 171.9 175.4 174.0 126.3 S3 146.8 167.8 158.7 170.5 165.0 156.2 S4 153.0 167.9 175.9 161.7 161.9 140.9 S1 S2 S3 S4 151.8 (5.3) L 126.0 (6.9) R 114.5 (5.8) 170.7 (4.5) 166.8 (8.4) 169.7 (5.7) 127.6 121.8 146.7 (12.8) (18.2) (11.5) 133.2 (7.5) 125.4 149.5 (13.5) (13.6) 168.4 (5.9) 29.6 (4.6) 64.4 (2.9) 137.0 (14.7) 99.9 (24.1) 53.1 (7.9) L 112.7 112.3 102.5 136.6 57.5 42.5 R 96.0 107.7 110.5 147.9 37.3 78.4 L 116.1 122.1 124.4 139.1 39.7 76.9 R 110.6 119.6 118.1 132.3 37.1 28.8 L 138.9 134.7 120.2 164.2 34.9 19.8 R 124.0 125.5 107.8 117.8 21.9 42.9 L 131.5 131.9 119.2 129.9 45.3 56.0 R 130.9 132.0 122.9 108.6 28.0 57.4 L 124.8 125.3 116.6 (12.5) (10.2) (9.7) R 115.4 121.2 114.8 (15.4) (10.3) (6.9) 142.5 (15.0) 126.7 (17.2) 44.4 (9.7) 31.1 (7.5) 48.8 (24.0) 51.9 (21.2)

Fig. 4. Change in hip and shoulder joint angles

Table 6. Touchdown and takeoff angles of board and horse, landing angle (unit: ) BC HC BTD BTO HTD HTO 63.4 (1.6) 106.0 (6.4) 24.0 (3.0) 81.7 (10.0) LD 54.2 (7.5) S1 63.8 113.5 32.5 83.2 78.6 S2 65.2 107.5 23.3 75.8 89.7 S3 64.8 107.7 28.9 86.1 69.6 S4 62.3 102.4 29.8 81.8 77.0 64.0 (1.3) 107.8 (4.5) 28.6 (3.9) 81.7 (4.3) 78.7 (8.3) Table 7. Rotation angles of the thigh and trunk (unit: ) Thigh Trunk BTD BTO HTD HTO Peak LD 42.2 (4.3) 105.1 (11.1) 188.4 (5.4) 261.2 (7.8) 455.5 (5.4) 770.0 (14.6) S1 39.7 119.6 219.2 278.2 436.5 825.8 S2 51.0 113.1 186.2 258.4 429.5 822.8 S3 45.2 111.2 195.5 267.6 451.2 787.7 S4 49.3 103.0 194.4 265.0 456.6 805.0 46.3 (5.0) 112.7 (2.7) 111.7 (6.8) 141.1 (4.7) 198.8 (14.2) 179.9 (8.9) 267.3 (8.2) 250.5 (10.5) 443.5 (12.6) 457.8 (6.8) 810.3 (17.7) 766.5 (1.7) S1 113.9 129.3 172.1 248.6 451.3 741.8 S2 112.6 133.3 168.5 240.5 436.9 753.9 S3 109.6 136.6 161.3 253.9 433.3 729.7 S4 117.7 136.9 184.2 241.2 450.9 758.0 113.5 (3.4) 134.0 (3.5) 171.5 (9.6) 246.1 (6.4) 443.1 (9.4) 745.9 (12.8)

Table 8. Twist angle of the trunk (unit: ) BTD BTO HTD HTO Peak LD 2.7 (13.3) 7.1 (10.8) 14.1 (6.2) 11.4 (5.7) 222.8 (17.0) 1049.5 (4.3) S1 1.3 2.3 1.8 8.4 220.4 896.2 S2 0.3 1.4 8.4 10.8 180.1 903.7 S3 3.7 4.0 3.3 35.8 153.2 846.2 S4 0.2 6.3 2.1 12.5 205.0 877.7 1.3 (1.7) 1.7 (4.2) 2.3 (4.8) 7.3 (21.7) 189.7 (29.4) 881.0 (25.6)

Table 9. Angular velocities of the thigh and trunk (unit: /s) BTO HTD HTO Peak LD BC PrF HC PoF PoF Asc PoF Des 758.5 (30.2) 741.9 (54.2) 231.4 (104.7) 212.3 (93.7) 759.6 (37.4) 495.0 (75.9) 470.1 (3.5) 485.8 (22.4) Thigh rotation Trunk rotation S1 578.5 670.8 48.6 289.6 653.5 407.2 391.5 526.4 S2 681.5 704.7 52.8 289.2 702.0 427.0 408.5 495.1 S3 780.7 682.1 122.3 576.8 723.6 393.5 473.4 505.8 S4 692.0 583.2 368.2 337.4 678.4 471.4 459.3 508.1 683.2 (82.8) 660.2 (53.2) 302.6 (22.5) 148.0 (150.7) 564.4 (44.9) 373.3 (137.6) 442.5 (34.5) 277.1 (28.7) 689.4 (30.2) 355.4 (35.6) 424.8 (34.0) 471.1 (12.3) 433.2 (39.4) 506.5 (47.0) 508.9 (13.0) 479.8 (13.2) S1 357.2 598.7 292.1 137.8 281.8 528.0 507.0 391.1 S2 306.9 583.7 14.0 196.4 337.2 429.5 472.9 398.5 S3 201.6 525.6 496.2 255.5 222.6 493.4 468.0 444.8 S4 351.1 400.8 257.7 191.7 353.7 380.2 498.1 445.2 304.2 (72.0) 527.2 (90.0) 90.4 (65.8) 1308.8 (120.4) 265.0 (197.7) 684.2 (184.8) 195.4 (48.1) 298.8 (59.4) 457.8 (65.9) 997.7 (24.4) 486.5 (19.0) 573.9 (26.8) 419.9 (29.1) 1278.2 (14.2) S1 15.1 1027.0 193.3 791.3 570.8 914.8 Trunk twist S2 22.6 1077.2 136.9 752.5 460.3 910.6 S3 296.0 1195.9 489.9 828.5 490.3 1035.4 S4 20.9 1212.6 142.5 797.9 525.0 976.8 69.8 (152.0) 1128.2 (90.5) 240.7 (168.1) 792.6 (31.2) 511.6 (47.5) 959.4 (59.0)

AbdelAziz, Y. I., & Karara, H. M. (1971). Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates in objectspace coordinates in close range photogrammetry. Proceedings of the ASP Symposium of CloseRange Photogrammetry. Urbana: University of Illinois. Kim, S. K. & Park, Y. J. (1994). A Kinematic Analysis of Cuervo and Cuervo Full turn Motions of Gymnastics. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 33(2), 133143. Park, J. H., Youn, S. H. Back, J. H., Kim, D.M., Chung, N. J. (2003). The Kinematical Analysis of Ropez Motion in Horse Vaulting. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 42(3), 697708. Park, J. H. & Song, J. H. (2012). The Kinematic Analysis of Vault. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 23(3), 702717. Park, J. H. & Song, J. H. (2015). The Kinematic Analysis of Tsukahara Stretched with 7/2 Turn ( 2) in Vault. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 26(2), 413429. Park, C. H., Kim, Y. K. (2014). Kinematic Comparisons between Yang1 and Yang2 Vaults in Men`s Artistic Gymnastics. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 24(4), 317327. Song, J. H. (2017). A Study of the Possibility of New Technique in Vault for the 2020 Olympic Games in Tokyo. Seoul: Korea Institute of Sport Science. Song, J. H., Kim, K. J., Park, J. H. (2016). A Study on the Optimization of Vault for the 2016 Liu Olympic Games. Seoul: Korea Institute of Sport Science. Song, J. H., Moon, Y. J., Kim, K. J., Kwon, Y. H., Park, J. H. (2014). A study to improve the completeness of new technique (tsukahara stretched with 7/2 turn) in vault. Seoul: Korea Institute of Sport Science. Song, J. H. & Park, J. H. (2016). A Comparative Study of Kinematic Characteristics of Ri Se Gwang Motion in Vault. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 27(3), 644655. Song, J. H., Lee, S. H., Song, H. S., Park, J. H., Ha, C. S. (2011). Analysis to improve the completeness of new technique (handspring forward and salto forward straight with triple twist) in vault. Seoul: Korea Institute of Sport Science. Lee, S. H., Park, J. H., Lee, J. H. (2006). Kinematic Analysis of Acopian in Vault. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 16(1), 8999.

Lim, K. C. (2004). Biomechanical Analysis of Tsukahara Vault with Double Salto Backward Piked. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 14(3), 135147. Takei, Y., Blucker, Erik P., Hudert Dunn, J., Myers, Scott A., & Fortney, Virginia L. (1996). A Threedimensional analysis of the men's compulsory vault performed at the 1992 Olympic Games. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 12, 237257. Takei, Y. (2007). The Roche Vault Performed by Elite Gymnasts: Somersaulting Technique, Deterministic Model and Judges Scores. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 23, 111. Yoon, C. S. & Kim, T. S. (2006). The Kinematic Difference to the Skill Level in the Yurchenko Stretch Skill of Horse Vaulting. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 16(2), 135144.