1. 목차_kkh hwp

Similar documents
歯목차.PDF

<BFACB1B8B0FAC1A62D372E687770>

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 35~55 학술 전력시장가격에대한역사적요인분해 * 35

歯표지_최종H_.PDF

KDI Journal of Economic Policy, 2009 II


164

<C7A5C1F620BEE7BDC4>

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 1~29 정책 용도별특성을고려한도시가스수요함수의 추정 :, ARDL,,, C4, Q4-1 -

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 1~26 실물옵션을이용한해상풍력실증단지 사업의경제성평가 1

<2D3828C8AE29B9DAC3B5B1D42E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

부문별 에너지원 수요의 변동특성 및 공통변동에 미치는 거시적 요인들의 영향력 분석

<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>

제 출 문 국방부 장관 귀하 본 보고서를 국방부 군인연금과에서 당연구원에 의뢰한 군인연금기금 체 계적 관리방안 연구용역의 최종보고서로 제출합니다 (주)한국채권연구원 대표이사 오 규 철

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

2

歯목차.PDF

1차1~6장12.9

에너지경제연구 제13권 제2호

<C3D6C1BEBFCFBCBA2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D31C8A3292E687770>

34, 40 34, Blume, Easley and O Hara(1994)..,. (random walk),. Easley and O Hara(1987). Karpoff(1987) (1987) (+). (private information) (public informa

KDI정책포럼제221호 ( ) ( ) 내용문의 : 이재준 ( ) 구독문의 : 발간자료담당자 ( ) 본정책포럼의내용은 KDI 홈페이지를 통해서도보실수있습니다. 우리나라경

, ( ) * 1) *** *** (KCGS) 2003, 2004 (CGI),. (+),.,,,.,. (endogeneity) (reverse causality),.,,,. I ( ) *. ** ***

에너지경제연구 제13권 제1호

歯스왑노트1

<C3D6C1BE5FBFACB1B8BAB8B0EDBCAD D30335FC1B6B5BFC3B65FBFECB8AEB0E6C1A6C0C7BFAAB5BFBCBA5F6B E687770>

Microsoft PowerPoint - Freebairn, John_ppt

노동경제논집 38권 4호 (전체).hwp

에너지경제연구 제13권 제1호

hwp

... 수시연구 국가물류비산정및추이분석 Korean Macroeconomic Logistics Costs in 권혁구ㆍ서상범...

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 18, Number 1, March 2019 : pp 에너지전환정책및고령화가국민경제에미치는영향 : 확률적중첩세대일반균형모형 (Stochastic Overlapping Genera

공휴일 전력 수요에 관한 산업별 분석


(IRS)

에너지경제연구 제12권 제2호

- 1 -

韓國開發硏究제 33 권제 1 호 ( 통권제 110 호 ) 소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 이한규 ( 한국개발연구원부연구위원 ) Terms of Trade Shocks and Nontradable Goods Price Inflation Targeting Unde

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

기타자료.PDF

Total Return Swap

±³º¸¸®¾óÄÚ

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 1~18 가격비대칭성검정모형민감도분석 1

<4B C0CEBBE7C0CCC6AE D323720C0CEBCE22E687770>

Buy one get one with discount promotional strategy

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

슬라이드 1

韓國開發硏究제 33 권제 3 호 ( 통권제 112 호 ) 재직자직업훈련관련공적재정의구조와성과 : 효과분석 이철인 ( 서울대학교사회과학대학경제학부교수 ) 유경준 ( 한국개발연구원선임연구위원 ) Training Incentives in the Korean Levy-Gran

<303320B9DABFF8BECF2E687770>


한국개발연구 표지_.hwp

에너지경제연구 제12권 제2호

지능정보연구제 16 권제 1 호 2010 년 3 월 (pp.71~92),.,.,., Support Vector Machines,,., KOSPI200.,. * 지능정보연구제 16 권제 1 호 2010 년 3 월

44-4대지.07이영희532~

에너지경제연구 제13권 제2호

ps

국제무역론-02장

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 95~118 학술 탄소은행제의가정용전력수요절감효과 분석 1) 2) 3) * ** *** 95

<3036C0CCBCB1BFEC2E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


<352EC7E3C5C2BFB55FB1B3C5EBB5A5C0CCC5CD5FC0DABFACB0FAC7D0B4EBC7D02E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

조재욱D)-63-88

06_À̼º»ó_0929

R&D : Ⅰ. R&D OECD 3. Ⅱ. R&D

<C3D6C1BE2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D32C8A3292E687770>

<C0CCBDB4C6E4C0CCC6DB34C8A35F28C3D6C1BE292E687770>

조사연구 권 호 연구논문 한국노동패널조사자료의분석을위한패널가중치산출및사용방안사례연구 A Case Study on Construction and Use of Longitudinal Weights for Korea Labor Income Panel Survey 2)3) a

182 동북아역사논총 42호 금융정책이 조선에 어떤 영향을 미쳤는지를 살펴보고자 한다. 일제 대외금융 정책의 기본원칙은 각 식민지와 점령지마다 별도의 발권은행을 수립하여 일본 은행권이 아닌 각 지역 통화를 발행케 한 점에 있다. 이들 통화는 일본은행권 과 等 價 로 연

Vol.257 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

에너지경제연구 제14권 제1호

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 12, Number 1, March 2013 : pp. 125~158 알뜰주유소전환으로인한자영주유소의 휘발유가격인하효과분석 125

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

<3132B1C732C8A328C0DBBEF7292E687770>

요 약 대한민국은 1948년 정부수립 이후 60년 만에 세계 13위의 경제대국으로 비약적인 성 장을 이루었다. 정부수립 2년 만에 북한의 전격 남침으로 전 국토가 초토화되었고, 휴 전 이후에도 안보에 대한 위협은 계속되었다. 그러나 대한민국 국민은 불리한 여건에 좌절하

<C0CCBDB426C1A4C3A D C532C444C5320BDC3C0E5C0C720B0C7C0FCC7D120BCBAC0E5C0BB20C0A7C7D120B9E6BEC82E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

이용석 박환용 - 베이비부머의 특성에 따른 주택유형 선택 변화 연구.hwp

歯4차학술대회원고(황수경이상호).PDF

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi


,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

에너지경제연구 제13권 제2호

untitled

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE. vol. 29, no. 10, Oct ,,. 0.5 %.., cm mm FR4 (ε r =4.4)


歯김미성원고.PDF

유한차분법을 이용한 다중 기초자산 주가연계증권 가격결정

①국문지리학회지-주성재-OK

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

???? 1


Transcription:

韓國開發硏究제 31 권제 2 호 ( 통권제 105 호 ) 이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 송준혁 ( 한국개발연구원부연구위원 ) Analyzing the Effect of Changes in the Benchmark Policy Interest Rate Using a Term Structure Model Joonhyuk Song (Associate Research Fellow, Korea Development Institute) * 송준혁 : (e-mail) jhsong@kdi.re.kr, (address) Korea Development Institute, Hoegiro 49, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea Key Word: (Term Structure of Interest Rate), (No Arbitrage), (Monetary Policy) JEL code: E43, E52, E58 Received: 2009. 8. 31 Referee Process Started: 2009. 8. 31 Referee Reports Completed: 2009. 11. 10

ABSTRACT This paper estimates the term structure of interest rates with the setup of 3-factor no arbitrage model and investigates the trend of term premia and the effectiveness of changes in policy interest rates. The term premia are found to be high in a three-year medium term objective, which can be interpreted as reflecting the recognition of investors who expect a higher uncertainty in real activities for the coming three years than for a longer term. Then, in order to look into the effect of policy interest rates after the recent change of benchmark interest rate, this paper analyzes the effects of the changes in short-term interest rates of the financial market on the yield curve of the bond market at time of change. Empirical results show that the discrepancy between call rate, short-term rate in money market, and instantaneous short rate, short-term rate in the bond market, is found to be significantly widened, comparing to the periods before the change in benchmark interest rate. It is not easy to conclude clearly for now whether such a widening gap is caused by the lack of experiences with managing new benchmark interest rate or is just an exceptional case due to the recent turmoil in the global financial market. However, monetary policy needs to be operated in a manner that could reduce the gap to enhance its effectiveness.

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 17 Ⅰ. 서론.,..... (term structure of interest rates) (,, ),.,..,,.. Vasicek(1977)

18 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ., Cox, Ingersoll, and Ross(1985) (general equilibrium). Duffie and Kan(1996), Dai and Singleton(2000), Duarte(2004), Kim and Orphanides(2006),., Bekaert, Cho, and Moreno(2005), Ang, Piazzesi, and Wei (2006), Rudebusch and Wu(2008), Doh (2009). 2000 2009 1 3,.. 7.,,.. (1991) McCulloch 3 1, (2002) Heath-Jarrow-Morton., (2000) CIR, (2001) -.. (2005) (2007). (2005) Nelson-

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 19 Siegel 1, 3. (2007) 2,.,. (2007) 3, (signalling).. 3,..,. Ⅱ. 모형설정. Harrison and Kreps (1979), (riskneutral probability measure) (state price) (equivalent martingale measure)., (complete market). Duffie(2002), Dai and Singleton(2002), Duarte(2004) 3 (3-factor arbitrage-free term structure model), (affine model).

20 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ. 1 (zero-coupon bond),.. : (1),.. (2)., (stochastic discount factor). 1) (3) (3). log ( )., (4) (4). 2) (5). (expectations hypothesis) 1). (marginal rate of substitution) (level of marginal utility). Cochrane(2001). 2) Cochrane(2001).

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 21. (risk premium hypothesis). Dai and Singleton(2000) (level), (slope) (curvature)....,,. 3). 4),. (latent factors)., (risk-neutral probability measure) Ornstein- Uhlenbeck., (5), (mean reversion), 3) Fama and Bliss(1987), Mishkin(1990), Fama(1990), Campbell and Shiller(1991), Cochrane and Piazzesi(2005), Hamilton and Kim(2002). 4) Ang and Piazzesi(2003), Diebold, Rudebusch, and Aruoba(2006), Rudebusch and Wu (2008), Bekaert, Cho, and Moreno(2005).

22 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ, (volatility).. (short rate). (6),.... (7) (7) 3, (market price of risk). Duffie and Kan(1996), (physical probability measure) ( ). (8),.. (9) 또는 또는,, (PDE). (10),.

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 23, ( ) ( ). exp log (11). Dai and Singleton(2000). 5) (lower-triangular matrix), (diagonal matrix), (term premium).,. Ⅲ. 자료및추정 (12) (conditional expectations).... 1. 분석자료 KIS 3, 6, 9, 1, 2, 3, 5 1, 2000 8 2 2009 8 19 473. 1 5) Dai and Singleton(2000).

24 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ [Figure 1] Trends of Interest Rates(2000. 8. 2~2009. 8. 19) Source: KIS Ratings.. 6),, 1.,. [Figure 1] 7 1 3. 2000. 2006, 2008. 2008 10. (curvature) 6) (2001) 1.

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 25 <Table 1> Summary Statistics for Interest Rates Mean Std. Dev Skewness Kurtosis Autocorrelation Jarque-Bera Normality Test Call Rate 4.0740 (0.1004) 0.8394 (0.1419) -0.9146 (0.1725) 3.8701 (0.5372) 0.9949 (0.0089) 0.0010 y 3M 4.3714 (0.1206) 1.0101 (0.2065) -0.4850 (0.2515) 3.8713 (0.5268) 0.9952 (0.0128) 0.0010 y 6M 4.5181 (0.1209) 1.0146 (0.2047) -0.3455 (0.2668) 3.7983 (0.4992) 0.9926 (0.0147) 0.0010 y 9M 4.6566 (0.1173) 0.9847 (0.1834) -0.1007 (0.2601) 3.5584 (0.4375) 0.9897 (0.0160) 0.0289 y 1Y 4.7659 (0.1163) 0.9769 (0.1718) 0.0593 (0.2417) 3.3482 (0.3928) 0.9870 (0.0166) 0.2123 y 2Y 5.0678 (0.1126) 0.9472 (0.1530) 0.5186 (0.2053) 3.1640 (0.4251) 0.9805 (0.0181) 0.0010 y 3Y 5.2581 (0.1154) 0.9702 (0.1632) 0.6251 (0.2143) 3.2371 (0.4740) 0.9800 (0.0180) 0.0010 y 5Y 5.5049 (0.1190) 1.0020 (0.1706) 0.6470 (0.2150) 3.1564 (0.4950) 0.9787 (0.0174) Note: Standard errors of summary statistics are estimated using GMM and presented in parentheses. 0.0010., 1 Vasicek CIR. <Table 1> 1 7. 3 1 3.. (normality) Jarque-Bera 3.

26 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ [Figure 2] Sample Average Term Structure 1. 1 0.98,.,. [Figure 2] 1. <Table 1>. 7), 70%,. (principal component analysis). 7) (2001), (2007) 3, 2, 5.,

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 27 [Figure 2] Cumulative Explanatory Power of Principal Components, (level), (slope), (curvature).. 8) 52 moving window (eigenvalue),. [Figure 2]. 1 60% 1. 8) Piazzesi(2003) 3 (level), (slope), (curvature), 2 (level) (slope), 1 (level)., Litterman and Scheinkman(1991) (curvature). Cochrane and Piazzesi(2005).

28 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ,. 2 98% 2000 2006., 3.. 2. 모형추정과결과 Duffie and Stanton(2004), Kim and Orphanides(2006) - (state space model). - (Kalman filter).. (measurement equation) 3 5 7. 3M 3, 3 3..,. (state equation). 9). -. <Table 2>. 9) James and Webber(2000), Kim and Orphanides(2006).

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 29 <Table 2> Parameter Estimates Param. Est Std. Err Param. Est Std. Err 0.1271 0.3701-1.6824 4.1058-1.5111 0.5878-0.1384 0.3959 0.5454 0.1855 0.4534 0.2243-2.1355 0.6331-1.9097 0.7417 0.5410 0.1887-0.0098 0.0900 0.0003 0.0002 0.4420 0.1472 0.0037 0.0069 0.3261 0.1375 0.0053 0.0048 4.89e-8 6.53e-5 0.0402 0.0153 3.28e-4 1.53e-5-0.5728 0.4187 1.11e-4 2.16e-5-1.4363 0.6886 3.59e-4 1.72e-5-3.9055 0.4538 5.19e-4 1.99e-5 0.4946 0.1642 6.24e-5 7.87e-5-9.6307 2.8164 1.08e-3 4.89e-5 Log-likelihood 41.8285, 4.02% (2007) 2 4.07%. (mean reversion).,. <Table 3> RMSE(Root Mean Squared Error) MAE(Mean Absolute Error). RMSE 3 2.424%, 9 1.274%, 1.645%

30 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ <Table 3> Root Mean Squared Error 3M 6M 9M 1Y 2Y 3Y 5Y All RMSE (%) 2.424 1.811 1.274 1.351 1.345 1.424 1.645 1.654 MAE (%) 1.298 1.044 0.865 0.817 0.991 1.099 1.212 1.047 Note: RMSE (%) =, MAE (%) =., MAE 3 1.298%, 1 0.817% 1.047%. RMSE MAE. [Figure 3] 1. 2002, 2000 10).. 2003, 2008. 24bp 2004 14bp. [Figure 2] 1 ( ), 2008, 2009 3.5%. 2008 9 Lehman Brothers Merrill Lynch, 10) 2000 10 0.25%p 2004 11 10.

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 31 [Figure 3] Short Rate, Call Rate and Term Premium [Figure 4] Term Premium for All Maturities

32 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ. [Figure 4].,, 3. 1~3., 3.. Ⅳ. 정책금리변경의효과분석.. 2008 10 9 5.25% 25bp 2009 2 12 2.00% 6 325bp. 2009 2 11 5.25% 2008 8 7 8 6, 2009 8 19, [Figure 5]. 2008 8 2009 2, 1%p.. 2009 2 8, 2 8 0.6%p 2009 8 2009 2. 6.

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 33 [Figure 5] Yields and Term Premia, 2008 8., 2009 2,. 2 12,. 2009 8,. 2008 8. 2009 2,. 7

34 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ. 2008 8 7 5% 5.25%.,,.. [Figure 6] 0 10 (cumulative increments).. 2008 8 7, 25bp. 2008 10 9 10 35bp 3 17bp, 14bp., 12bp. 2008 10 9. 2008 8 7 11). [Figure 6].. 6 2009 2 12. <Table 4> 11bp. 11) 2008 4 4.1% 7 5.9%.

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 35 [Figure 6] Cumulative Increments of Call and Short Rates

36 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ <Table 4> Changes in Call Rates (unit: %) Date t Difference -3 (A) -2 (B) -1 (C) 0 (D) D-C C-B B-A 2008. 10. 9 5.23 5.06 5.12 4.98-0.14 0.06-0.17 2008. 10. 27 4.89 4.98 4.98 4.28-0.70 0.00 0.09 2008. 11. 7 4.02 4.04 4.22 3.97-0.25 0.18 0.02 2008. 12. 11 3.71 3.61 3.62 3.16-0.46 0.01-0.10 2009. 1. 9 2.59 2.58 2.98 2.49-0.49 0.40-0.01 2009. 2. 12 2.20 2.07 2.06 2.02-0.04-0.01-0.13 Note: t = -k denotes k days prior to the decrease in policy rate., (autonomously).. 12) 2008 12 11. (2007),,,.... 3 12)., 2008 3..

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 37 3. 3.,. [Figure 7] 3 [Figure 6].... (market segmentation hypothesis).,,...,,.,

38 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ [Figure 7] Cumulative Increments of 3-Year Yields: Actual vs. Estimated

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 39. 2007 11 30 2008 3 7 RP. 13) RP.. [Figure 8] 2001~07, [Figure 9]. 20bp,., RP,. V. 결론..,.. 13), (2007. 12. 4).

40 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ [Figure 8] Cumulative Increments When Target Call is Decreased: 2001~2007

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 41 [Figure 9] Cumulative Increments When Target Call is Increased: 2001~2007

42 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ. 2008, 2008 9. 7 RP 7,. RP.,. (regime switching),... 2003,..

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 43 참고문헌, :,, 13 2, 2000, pp.1~24., -,, 9 2, 2001, pp.265~286.,,, 12 2, 2007, pp.32~93.,,, 12 4, 2007, pp.121~166., :,, 2000, pp.1~47., Heath-Jarrow-Morton,, 8 2, 2002, pp.56~80.,,, 9, 1996, pp.411~424.,,, 11 2, 2005, pp.35~82.,,, 13, 1991, pp.327~355. Ang, Andrew and Monika Piazzesi, A No-Arbitrage Vector Autoregression of Term Structure Dynamics with Macroeconomic and Latent Variables, Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 2003, pp.745~787. Ang, Andrew, Monika Piazzesi and Min Wei, What Does the Yield Curve Tell Us about GDP Growth? Journal of Econometrics 131, 2006, pp.359~403. Bekaert, Geert, Seonghoon Cho, and Antonio Moreno, New-Keynesian Macroeconomics and the Term Structure, NBER WP No.11340, 2005. Campbell, John Y. and Robert J. Shiller, Yield Spreads and Interest Rate Movements: A Bird's Eye View, Review of Economic Studies 58(3), pp.195~228. Cochrane, John H., Asset Pricing, Princeton University Press, 2001. Cochrane, John H. and Monika Piazzesi, Bond Risk Premia, American Economic Review 95(1), 2005, pp.138~160. Cox, John, Jonathan Ingersoll, and Stephen Ross, A Theory of Term Structure of Interest Rates, Econometrica 53, 1985, pp.385~408. Dai, Qiang and Kenneth J. Singleton, Specification Analysis of Affine Term Structure Models, Journal of Finance 55, 2000, pp.531~552.

44 韓國開發硏究 / 2009. Ⅱ Dai, Qiang and Kenneth J. Singleton, Expectation Puzzles, Time-varying Risk Premia, and Affine Models of the Term Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 63, 2002, pp.415~441. Diebold, Francis X. and C. Li, Forecasting the Term Structure of Government Bond Yields, Penn Institute for Economic Research Working Paper No.02-26, 2002. Diebold, Francis X., Glenn D. Rudebusch, and Boragan S. Aruoba, The Macroeconomy and the Yield Curve, Journal of Econometrics 131, 2006, pp.309~339. Doh, Taeyoung, Yield Curve in an Estimated Nonlinear Macro Model, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Working Paper, 2009. Duarte, Jefferson, Evaluating an Alternative Risk Preference in Affine Term Structure Models, Review of Financial Studies 17(2), 2004, pp.379~404. Duffie, Darrell and Rui Kan, A Yield-Factor Model of Interest Rates, Mathematical Finance 6(4), 1996, pp.379~406. Duffie, Darrell and Kenneth J. Singleton, An Econometric Model of the Term Structure of Interest Rate Swap Yields, Journal of Finance 52, 1997, pp.1287~1321. Estrella, Arturo and Frederic S. Mishkin, Predicting U.S. Recessions: Financial Variables as Leading Indicators, Review of Economics and Statistics 80, 1998, pp.45~61 Fama, Eugene F., Stock Returns, Expected Returns, and Real Activity, Journal of Finance 45(4), 1990, pp.1089~1108. Fama, Eugene F. and Robert R. Bliss, The Information in Long-Maturity Forward Rates, American Economic Review 77(4), 1987, pp.680~692. Hamilton, James and Dong Heon Kim, A Re-Examination of the Predictability of the Yield Spread for Real Economic Activity, Journal of Mone, Credit, and Banking 34, 2002, pp.340~360. Harrison, Michael J. and David Kreps, Martingales and Arbitrage in Multi-Period Securities Markets, Journal of Economic Theory 20, 1979, pp.381~408. Huang, Shirley J. and Jun Yu, On Stiffness in Affine Asset Pricing Models, Journal of Computational Finance 10(3), 2007, pp.99~123. Ilmanen, Antti, Overview of Forward Rate Analysis, Salomon Brothers, 1995. James, Jessica and Nick Webber, Interest Rate Modelling, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 2000. Kim, Don H. and Athanasios Orphanides, Term Structure Estimation with Survey Data on Interest Rate Forecasts, Finance and Economic Discussion Paper, Federal Reserve Board, 2006. Litterman, Robert and Jose Scheinkman, Common Factors Affecting Bond Returns, Journal of Fixed Income 1, 1991, pp.54~61. Mishkin, Frederic S., The Information of the Longer Maturity Term Structure about Future Inflation, Quarterly Journal of Economics 55, 1990, pp.815~828. Piazzesi, Monika, Affine Term Structure Models, unpublished manuscript, 2003. Phillips, Peter C. B. and Jun Yu, Maximum Likelihood and Gaussian Estimation of Continuous Time Models in Finance, Handbook of Financial Time-series, 2009, pp.497~530.

이자율기간구조를이용한정책금리변경의효과분석 45 Rudebusch, Glenn D. and Tau Wu, A Macro-Finance Model of the Term Structure, Monetary Policy, and the Economy, Economic Journal 118(530), 2008, pp.906~926. Vasicek, O., An Equilibrium Characterization of the Term Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 5, 1977, pp.177~188.