슬라이드 1

Similar documents
15_3oracle

Slide 1

Oracle Apps Day_SEM

Æí¶÷4-¼Ö·ç¼Çc03ÖÁ¾š

00내지1번2번

PowerPoint Presentation

Slide 1

Journal Price Study

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

06_À̼º»ó_0929


Slide 1

¿À¸®ÄÞ40

슬라이드 1

BSC Discussion 1

1

<392D313128BFF92920C1B6B0A320BAB8B5B5C0DAB7E128C0C7C4A1C0C7C7D0BAB9C7D5C7D0C0A7B0FAC1A4C3DFC1F8B0E8C8B9292E687770>

¨ë Áö¸®ÇÐȸÁö-¼Û°æ¾ðOK

A Problem for Government STAGE 6: Policy Termination STAGE 1: Agenda Setting STAGE 5: Policy Change STAGE 2: Policy Formulation STAGE 4: Policy Evalua

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

°¡°Ç2¿ù-ÃÖÁ¾

2019_2nd_guide_kr_0619.indd

13.11 ①초점

ecorp-프로젝트제안서작성실무(양식3)

¿À¸®ÄÞ38

03-ÀÌÁ¦Çö

Scopus 한국어이용가이드-3차수정

< C6AFC1FD28C3E0B1B8292E687770>

Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

°í¼®ÁÖ Ãâ·Â

09오충원(613~623)

<C0FCB9AE20B1E2BCFA20BFDCB1B9C0CEB7C220B3EBB5BFBDC3C0E520BAD0BCAE2E687770>

07_À±¿ø±æ3ÀüºÎ¼öÁ¤

00.앞부분2

내 연구논문 성과 알아보기

歯CRM개괄_허순영.PDF

Microsoft PowerPoint - UHXXEMZJGVSS.pptx

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

27송현진,최보아,이재익.hwp


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

ISSUE

, Analyst, , Table of contents Executive summary 3 Investment thesis Deal tracker 44 Compan

H_AR_ P

<443A5CB1E8BFC144425CBAB8B0EDBCAD5CB4EBC7D0C7F5BDC5B0FAB0E6C0EFB7C228C3D6C1BE295F E2E2E>

< B3E25FBBE7B8C1BFF8C0CEC5EBB0E85FB0E1B0FA5F76332DBCF6C1A42E687770>


< B3E220C0CCBDB4C6E4C0CCC6DB2DB9E8B0E6C8AD28C3D6C1BEBCF6C1A4BABB E687770>

<5B31362E30332E31315D20C5EBC7D5B0C7B0ADC1F5C1F8BBE7BEF720BEC8B3BB2DB1DDBFAC2E687770>

, Analyst, , Table of contents 2

264 축되어 있으나, 과거의 경우 결측치가 있거나 폐기물 발생 량 집계방법이 용적기준에서 중량기준으로 변경되어 자료 를 활용하는데 제한이 있었다. 또한 1995년부터 쓰레기 종 량제가 도입되어 생활폐기물 발생량이 이를 기점으로 크 게 줄어들었다. 그러므로 1996년부

04김호걸(39~50)ok


°Ç°�°úÁúº´6-2È£

Disclaimer IPO Presentation,. Presentation...,,,,, E.,,., Presentation,., Representative...

±¹¹® »ï¼º Ç¥Áö ¹Û

One Stop Service,

시안


SchoolNet튜토리얼.PDF

<312EBFACB1B8C0DAB7E C1D6BFE4B1B9C0C75FB1B9C0AFB8B25FB0E6BFB5B5BFC7E2292DC3D6C1BEC6ED2E687770>

<BEF0B7D0C1DFC0E B3E220BABDC8A32E706466>

±×¸°¸®Æ÷Æ® ³»Áö5Â÷

¼�È«¼® Ãâ·Â

¨èÂ÷·Ê

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

07_À±ÀåÇõ¿Ü_0317

<30312E2028C3D6C1BEBAB8B0EDBCAD29BDB4C6DBBCB6C0AF5F E786C7378>

_ _ Reading and Research in Archaeology. _ Reading and Research in Korean Historical Texts,,,,,. _Reading and Research in Historical Materials from Ko

°¡°Ç6¿ù³»ÁöÃÖÁ¾


204

C O N T E N T S 1. FDI NEWS 2. GOVERNMENT POLICIES 3. ECONOMY & BUSINESS 4. FDI STATISTICS 5. FDI FOCUS

리텀 백서 새로저장-작은용량

광주국제족부관절심포지엄프로그램_웹용_수정2.indd

(5차 편집).hwp

Microsoft Word - Westpac Korean Handouts.doc

ÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æ-Áß±Þ

KARAAUTO_1¿ù.qxd.ps, page Normalize

All That Story_회사소개서 Final Version( )


The characteristic analysis of winners and losers in curling: Focused on shot type, shot accuracy, blank end and average score SungGeon Park 1 & Soowo

기업은행현황-표지-5도

12È«±â¼±¿Ü339~370

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

<B1E2C8B9BEC828BFCFBCBAC1F7C0FC29322E687770>

제 출 문 국가지식재산위원회 위원장 귀하 본 보고서를 "2015년 지식재산 활용전문위원회 정책이슈 발굴 연구" 최종보고서로 제출합니다. 2015년 11월 7일 주관연구기관명 : 한송온라인리걸센터(주) 연구기간 : ~ 주관연구책임자 :

Çö´ëÀ§¾Æ½Ã¾È10

untitled

untitled

歯Final-Handout.PDF

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

Microsoft Word - 크릴전쟁_당신이 모르는 남극 바닷속 쟁탈전_FINAL.docx

Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

e- 11 (Source: IMT strategy 1999 'PERMISSION ' ) The World Best Knowledge Providers Network

Microsoft PowerPoint - SVPSVI for LGNSYS_ ppt

歯1.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

월호 IBK(고해상단면).pdf

Transcription:

Global scientific collaboration in research landscape 2012 Elsevier User Seminar May 22-23, 2012 SciVal Product Sales Manager 장현주차장

Agenda Trends 연구경쟁 연구협력 Competition 경쟁전략 벤치마킹 Collaboration 전략적인협력 연구협력기회

R&D Budget per Nation (PPP USD) Competition : R&D Investment 400,000,000 350,000,000 300,000,000 250,000,000 200,000,000 150,000,000 100,000,000 50,000,000 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Note: China is total of China, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and China, Macao Special Administrative Region. Data for the following years/nations are estimated data; 2008 India, 2003/2005/2007 Australia. Source: UNESCO, Institute of Statistics Year

Number of Publication Competition : Publication growth 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Year Source: SCImago (Based on SciVerse Scopus data)

Competition : Applications and Awards < 연구기금신청은늘어나고있으나, 수여및성공률은낮아짐 > Source: NIH IMPAC, Success Rate File, March 22, 2012

Competition: Research Outputs by countries <Publication Overview: 2006-2010 Scopus 등재논문기준 >

Percentage of Papers with int l author Collaboration : Internationally co-authored Publication % 40 35 30 25 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Source: Knowledge, Networks and Nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century, The Royal Society, 2011

Number of International Collaborated Papers Collaboration : Change in Co-authored publication 2008 1996 Rate of International Publication Source: Knowledge, Networks and Nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century, The Royal Society, 2011

International collaboration: publication impact Source: Knowledge, Networks and Nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century, The Royal Society, 2011 9

SciVal Suite - Products 우리기관의우수연구역량분석솔루션 연구자프로파일링및연구네트워킹솔루션 연구비 ( 기금 ) 지원, 수여정보솔루션 Analyze institutional strengths Establish directory of research expertise 연구자, 연구그룹별의연구성과분석및벤치마킹솔루션 View funding opportunities & intelligence Benchmark performance of researchers & teams Analytics Report Source Data Custom Development and Data Reporting Services

Competition ( 연구경쟁 ) 연구활동분석 논문수, 논문증가율 피인용건수 논문당피인용건수 SciVal Suite 가기관의연구성과, 경쟁분석및전략수립을도와드립니다. 연구경쟁 연구역량 : 주제, 학제, 성장율 특정주제분야경쟁 : 우수연구기관, 연구자 연구기금 연구전략수립 연구경쟁전략 : 경쟁기관과의연구역량분석및비교 벤치마킹

Competition: Research Outputs by Korean Univ. <Publication Overview: 2006-2010 Scopus 등재논문기준 >

Total Citations from 2006-2010 Publication Competition: Publication, Citation, CPA 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 Number of Publication 2006-2010 Based on publication included in Scopus from 2006-2010. Source: SciVal Spotlight Korea Map 2010

Competition: Research Competencies (strengths) <Univ. A Competency Map> <Univ. A Competency Table> COMPUTER SCIENCE MATH & PHYSICS CHEMISTRY SOCIAL SCIENCE MULTI-DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AREAS ENGINEERING HEALTH SCIENCE MEDICINE 기관의고유연구역량 < 기관의연구역량 > 기관의연구역량분석 각역량의주제, 학제, 전세계적인성장율, 기관성장율분석 Source: SciVal Spotlight Univ. A. Competency Map 2010

Competition: Top institutions <Univ. A 의특정우수연구역량 - 우수연구기관정보 > Source: SciVal Spotlight Univ. A. Competency Map 2010

Competition: Top authors <Univ. A 의특정우수연구역량 - 우수연구자정보 > Source: SciVal Spotlight

Competition: Funding opportunities and results 연구기금기회및수령정보 Source: SciVal Funding

Based on publication included in Scopus from 2006-2010. Source: SciVal Spotlight Map 2010 for Korean Institutions Research Strategy: Institutional strengths Univ. A 와 B 의연구역량비교 University A University B

Research strategy: Individual competency Univ. A 와 B 의특정연구분야역량비교 Source: SciVal Spotlight

Research strategy: Comparative analysis Univ. A 와 B 의 PPM 비교및경쟁분석 Source: SciVal Spotlight University A University B Question Discipline? Star Discipline? 논문점유율을높일수현재의성장율, 점유을있는방법? 유지하기위한방법? -집중투자 -우수연구자채용 -우수연구자유지 논문성장은낮으나, 점유율이높은 연구분야

Research strategy: Competitors benchmarking Univ. A C 팀의연구경쟁력비교분석 Univ. A Univ. B Univ. C Univ. C - Current Faculty What-if scenario 1: What-if scenario 1: Current Faculty + Current Faculty + Recruit 1 Recruit 1 What-if scenario 2: Current Faculty + Recruit 2 Source: SciVal Strata

Collaboration ( 연구협력 ) 기관의연구협력현황 (Co authoring) 연구협력기관 우리기관의연구역량에기여하는연구협력분야 연구자별연구협력현황 연구자별연구협력 공저자네트워크 SciVal Suite 가기관의연구협력을지원하고, 네트워크구축을도와드립니다. 잠재적인연구협력기회제안 협력연구자추천 공저자네트워크구축제안

Collaboration: Institutional status Univ. A Collaboration map: 전세계저자들과연구협력현황 Source: SciVal Spotlight 2010 Collaboration Map

Collaboration: US institutions Univ. A Collaboration map: 미국내연구협력 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Harvard Johns Hopkins Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Source: SciVal Spotlight

Institutional Collaboration with Univ. B Univ. B 와의연구협력현황및협력기회 Source: SciVal Spotlight

Collaboration with individual competency 특정우수연구분야의연구협력기관 Source: SciVal Spotlight 2010 Map

Collaboration: Researcher, Research team 특정연구자, 연구팀간연구협력및네트워킹 Source: SciVal Strata

Collaboration: Individual researcher 연구자페이지 : 연구업적, 연구경향, 연구네트워크 Source: SciVal Experts

Collaboration: Coauthors of researcher 개인연구자의연구협력현황 Source: SciVal Experts

Collaboration: Research Network of researcher 개인연구자의공동연구네트워크 Source: MD Anderson SciVal Experts Website http://www.experts.scival.com/mdanderson/default.asp 30

Collaboration opportunity: Institution, author 연구협력기회 우수연구기관, 우수연구자 Source: SciVal Spotlight 31

Collaboration opportunity: Similar Experts 연구협력기회추천 공통분야관심을갖고있는전문가, 연구자 Source: MD Anderson SciVal Experts Website http://www.experts.scival.com/mdanderson/default.asp

Collaboration opportunity: Research network 미국의의과대학 A 팀의공동연구네크워크현황및사례 ; 일부교수님간에공동연구가이뤄지고있음. Experts 도입후, 해당학과전체교수님간의공동연구네트워크구축됨. 새로운소통방식및협력기회제공 Experts 도입전 Experts 도입후 Source: A Medical school Experts case

Collaboration opportunity: Research grant 연구협력기회추천 특정연구와관련된연구기금정보확인 Source: SciVal Funding

SciVal Suite 기대효과 기관의연구성과상세분석을통해연구전략개발및성공적인연구지원 Identify and build on research strengths 우수연구분야확인 채용혹은공동연구를 위한우수연구자확인 채용혹은공동연구 경우의효과예상 Acquire research funding 연구기금확보기회탐색 공동연구자탐색 Grow national and/or global prestige 효과적인연구를위한기관 내혹은다른기관과의협업 정기적인연구성과평가를 통한연구성과향상및연구 전략수립 대외적인연구성과및 평판도제고

도서관을위한새로운서비스제안 이용자를위한새로운서비스를찾고계십니까? 연구자프로파일링및연구네트워킹솔루션 연구기금 ( 비 ) 기회및수여정보제공솔루션 세계학계에서의연구자인지도제고 약 80% 이용자가 Google 검색을통해 Experts 접근 미국외지역의이용 45% 융합학문의연구협력가속화 연구비재원 : 국내에서전세계로범위확대 4,000 + funding bodies 의기금정보제공 NIH funding 80% - 국외연구자지원가능 다양한연구자, 이용자층을위한서비스확대

감사합니다. 장현주 Tel: 02-6714-3102 E-mail: d.jang@elsevier.com