ECO 2002-10 2002. 8 5,
.. Tel : 3771-0496, Fax : 3771-0110, E-mail : css@fki.or.kr
< > 1 5 17. 19. 5 (2002. 5. 23) 22. (2002. 7. 22) 25 5 27. 29. 31. 36. 42 5 45. 47. 51. 52. 53 5 55. 57. 63. 65
. 71. 76. 78 80 < > 81 5 83 5 86 90 91 (2000. 10. 23 ) 93 5 96 5 108 121
The issue of a f ive-day workweek and the problems it poses <Abstract> 1 Background 17 The Point at Issue 27. The Expediential Wage-Boosting Strategy 29. The Difference between Actual and Statutory Working Hours 31. Working Conditions that are inconsistent with International Standards 36. The Unilateral Introduction of Public and Banking Service 42 The Effect of a Five-day Workweek 45. The Increasing Cost of Labor 47. The Manpower Shortage in Medium and Small Enterprises 51. Unresolved Issues between Labor and Management 52. The Decrease in Employment 53 The Problem to be Solved 55. The Number of holidays per year 57. The No-Work-No-Pay Principle 63. The Working Condition Being consistent with the International Standard 65
. The Promotion of Using Holidays 71. The Expanded Exemptions regarding Working Hours and Holidays 76. The Schedule to Legalize a Five-Day Workweek 78 Reference 80 <Appendix> 81
A bstract The tripartite government-labor-management commission created an ad hoc committee in May of 2000 with the intent of introducing a five-day workweek through the case of a democratic process. The government and labor call for raising the number of noworking days to 136-146 days a year, as compared with the Western average of 126.8 days and Japan s 129-139 days. It is imprudent to raise the number of laborers off days under the new workweek system to exceed Japan s 129-139 days, particularly in light of the significant per-capita gross domestic product gap between the two countries(korea-$8,900 and Japan-$37,000). All things considered, the enforcement of a five-day workweek uniformly across the board is premature. The government s policy would aggravate the already severe manpower shortage in small and medium-sized businesses and deteriorate corporate competitiveness by increasing cost of labor.
1. 5 1998 (work sharing) 1998 6 4 2000 40 1999, ( 5 ) 2000 5, 2001 9 50-2000 10 23-2001 9 5,
2 5,, 2001 12 13 - (2001. 9) 2002 4 2002 7 5 7 20. 5 1. 5 5, 4 14.4%
3 5, 20% 2., 4944 40-2000 47.1 49.1 -, 5 -
4 5, -, - 1 (GDP) 2, 40 3. 2 3 - (2 3,000) 44, (1 3,000 ) 42-18,900(2001 )
5 44,,, 44 5 (129 139 ) - 15 25, 136 146 (145 ) 126.8 91(1 ) 101 (10) - 5
6 5, - 6 5 4. 5, 5 5, 5 5,,
7. 5 1. 40 19 (, 2002) - - 5 5, 5 - -
8 5, 2. 5 5 3. - - -
9 4. - 5,,. 5 1. (1) 5 (129 139 ), 15 25 136 146 -, (145 ) - 126.8
10 5, (2) 6, 5 52 15 91 136, 1, 15. (3) ( ), 2. (1).,
11 - (2) ( ) 4 3. (1), 50%ILO 25% (2) 5 12, 24 3 3 4 3
12 5, 31 ( ) (3) 40, 1 -, 40 1 (4) 1979 UN,
13 ILO - (12 ) ( ), 148 158 4. (1) 101 111 [ (52 ) ( 12 )(10 20 ) ( 17, 1 )(10 ;,, )], 1999 75.8 ()4438 44 40 34
14 5,, ( ) (2), 5., 6. () -
15 5 - ( 6 ) ( 5 )
5
5 19. 1998 (work sharing) 1998 6 4 2000 40 1999, ( 5 ) - 1999 6 25 1999-2000 3 24 ( ) 2000 5, 2001 9 50-2000 10 23
20 5, - 2001 9 5,, 2001 12 13 - (2001. 9) 2002 4 2002 4 24, 2002 4, 5 - (129 139 ) - - - 25% - 1 -
5 21 - - ( ) 2002 4 26 2002 5 2 4 5 3, -, 50%, 21 (2002. 5. 27), 4 (2002. 5. 30) -,, 11, (50%), (1 12 )
22 5,. 5 (2002. 5. 23) 2002 5 23 2002 7 1 5-5, 5-5 6 5-5 5-5 52 26 ( 12, 8,
5 23 6 ) 12 ( 8, 4 ) 12-1 1, 5 -, 5, - 5 6 5
24 5, < 5 > 1. 5 2002 7 1.,. 2. 5 8, 12, ( ) 6, ( ). 3.. 4. 5.
5 25. (2002. 7. 22) 2002 7 5 7 20 2002 7 22 < 1> 5 (2001. 9. 5) (2001. 12. 13) 4 (44 40 ) (12 ) (10 ) ( ),.,.,,. 40 ( ) ( ), ( ) 40 ( ) : 15 ( ) ( ) : 18 22, 3 1, 22 ( ) : 15 22, 3 1, 22 15 25 : 2 1
26 5, (2001. 9. 5) (2001. 12. 13) 2005 2012, 1,000 : 2002. 7 300 : 2003. 7 50 : 2005. 1 : 2007. 1,, : 2002. 7 1,000 : 2003. 7 500 : 2004. 7 300 : 2005. 7 50 : 2007. 7 10 : 2010. 1 2006 25% 50% 4 325% ( 50%) 50% 1 16 1 12 40 3 16 (12) 1 12 1 (: 21) 1 6 1 12, 1 52 3 :,, 40
5
5 29. 1998 IMF -, - 5-5, 4 14.4% -,
30 5,, 4 (40 44) 5, 20%, (14.4% : 10%, 4.4%),, ( )
5 31. ( 44) 50 40, < 2> 40 (40) 1994 37.6 2.4 1995 36.3 3.7 1969 38.6 1.4 1973 38.0 2.0 1983 37.7 2.3 1975 40.9-0.9 1973 36.8 3.2 : 1) Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Legal and Contractual Limitations to Working Time in the European Union, 1997 2), 1999 Country reports on economic policy and trade practices, 2000. 3 3) ILO, Yearbook of labor statistics, 4),, 2000. 6
32 5, - 19381936 40, 40-1982 40 38-1987 40 40.6-1990 40 40-20002 84, 1995 44 49 44 40-2000 47.1 49.1 -,
5 33 - - - 5 -, - -,
34 5, OECD 27 2 - - 5, (loose-loose) - 1 (GDP) 2 - (2000. 5. 23) ( 49)( 44)
5 35, 40, 38 -,
36 5,., 2 3 - (2 3,000) 44, (1 3,000 ) 42-18,900(2001 ) ILO, 138 44 8561.6% - 44 (48), (45), (44) - 44(71.7%) (45.3%) (26.4%) 44,
5 37 < 3> ( 138) 54 (1) 52(1),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Guyana, Haitai,,,,, 48,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (52) 47 (1) 46, (2),,, Ginea-Bissau, Lesotho,,, Sao Tome 45 and Principe,, 1),, (12),,,,,,, 44,,,,,,,, (16) 43(1) 42,,, (4) 41,, (3),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 40,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Seychelles,,,,, (43) 38 (1) 35 (1) : 1),, 45 50 2), : 1), 1999 Country reports on economic policy and trade practices, 2000. 3 2) ILO, Conditions of work digest, 1995 3),, 2000. 6
38 5,, 5 5, 5 5 5-5, - 5 52 14%,,
5 39 50%,, 44 5 (129 139 ) -, - 18,900 3 7,000-15 25, 136 146 (145 ) 126.8 91(1 ) 101 (10) - (12 ), 148 158-10 (,, ), 146 156, 158 168
40 5, - 5 - - 5 4 6 5 - ILO 25% - 1 -.,
5 41 - (,,,,, ) 40 -,, - - 5,
42 5,. 5 5-5 5 5, - 5-5 - 5
5 43 5 5,, 2000 10
5
5 47. 40 - - 14.4% (< 4> ) - 4,,, -,
48 5, < 4> ( 44 40) <> : 5,000, : 47.9(99 ) : 44 (445,000 ) (3.95,000 150%) 249,250 (445,000 ) 40 5,500 (405,500 ) (7.95,500 150%) 285,175 [ 1] 100% 14.4% :,, 2000. 6 19 (, 2002) - 365 5 (12) 3 3 4 3 4 3, - - 5
5 49-30%, -. -, 5, 5 - - - 5 (, 2002. 5), 5, 58.4%( 23.3%, 35.1%) 26.6%
50 5, 5-5 (, 2002. 7), 5 81.7% ( 47.9%, 33.8%)
5 51. 5-76.6%, 7.6%(, 2001) - 5 -
52 5,. - - - - - 53% (, 2001) 21% 26% - 46.9%, 38.8% 12%
5 53. 5-5,, (,, ) - 1988.
5
5 57. 1. 5 (129 139 ) - 91(1 ) 101 (10) - 18,900 3 7,000, 15 25 136 146 -, (145 ) - 126.8 - (12 ), 148 158-10 (,, ), 146 156, 158 168( )
58 5,,, 91(1 ) 101 (10 ) = 52 + 17 + 12 + 10 (1 1 ) - 103 113 ( 12 ) - 10 (,,, ) : 136 146 = 104 + 17 + 15 25 (2 1 ) - 10 (,,, ) : 126.8-129 139, 145( ), 136, 137 140, 120 150( ), 107 130, 102 109 2. 110, 2 1 1, 1 1
5 59-59 1 10, 9 8. 2 1 1 1 1., 20. - 57 1 1. 11. -,
60 5, 6, 5 52 15 91 136, 1, 1 15, (40 ) - 15, 104( )+17( )+ 15( )=136 129 139 -,
5 61 < 5> 1GDP (99 US$) ( ) () 8,551 34,374 34,091 24,715 25,783 24,630 12,521 36,979 52 17 10~40 12 12 : 91~121 : 103~133 104 15 10~20 104 10 104 8 24 104 9~12 24 104 11 30 78 22 7~30 52 11 7~14 129~139 114 136 137~140 145 107~130 70~77 10? 6~36????? : 101~131 : 113~143 ( ) 104 17 15 136 + 129~139 + 129~139 + : : 114 +(6~36) 114 +(6~36) 136 + 137~140 + 145 107~130 + + 5 ( ) 136 + 137~140 + 145 107~130 + + 70~77 + 70~77 + 3. ( ) 16, 1 17
62 5, < 6> 17 15 10 8 9~12 11 12 11 11 1GDP 8,551 34,374 34,091 24,715 25,783 24,630 11,530 36,979 - (99 US$) : 7 : ( ),
5 63. 1. 1 1-54 1 1.,,,, < 7> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 ( ) 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 I L O 1 1
64 5,,., - 2 2. 54 8 - ( ) 4
5 65. 1.,, 50% ILO 25% - 55, 10050., - -,,
66 5, - 50%ILO 25% 25% - 25% : ILO,,,,,, - 50% :, 2. 1 12-52 1 12 49 (1 44, 1 8).
5 67 5 12, 24 3 3 4 3 31-16 - ( ) 3. 2, 1-50 2
68 5, 149 1 49 1, 49 2. 1 149 1 49 1, 49 2. 56, 12. 2 1 -
5 69 40, 1 -, 40 1 : : : 35 : 4. - 71 1.
70 5, -,, 2 1979 UN, ILO - (12 ) ( ), 148 158,,
5 71. 1., ()44 38 -. (17 ), (10 ), (12 ) 39 44 1) 52-39 2) 8 52 = 38.0 : 1) 2) :,, 2000. 6
72 5, 38.04 1.2, 44.6 42.9, 42.6, 37.4, 36.6 < 8> (:,, ) 1GDP () () () () 50.0(99) 44 17 22 8,500(99) 38.0 45.6(98) 48 15 7 13,130(97) 44.6 48.4(98) 44 11 7 25,754(97) 41.2 37.5(98) 40 14 10 33,370(97) 36.3 41.7(98) 40 10 7 31,456(98) 37.4 37.7(98) 48 9 13 24 25,621(97) 42.9 37.0(95) 48 7 28 23,108(97) 42.6 : 1), 1999 Country reports on economic policy and trade practices, 2000. 3 2) ILO, Conditions of work digest, 1995 3),, 2000. 6 1 5 ( 5.6 ) 44 37.2
5 73 ( ) 44 1) 52-44 2) 8 52 = 37.2 : 1) () 2) (39 ) 5 ( ) :,, 2000. 6 10 ( ) 35.7 - (4.2 ),,, - (, ) 44 1) 52-54 2) 8 52 = 35.7 : 1) () 2) (39 ) 5 ( ) 10 ( ) :,, 2000. 6 101 111 [ (52 ) (12 )(10 20 ) (17, 1 )(10 ;,, )], 1999 75.8
74 5, - 22 8.8 ( 99 ) < 9> 80 85 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 24.6 295.2 69.8, 24.7 296.4 68.6 24.7 296.4 68.6 24.7 296.4 68.6 24.7 296.4 68.6 24.7 296.4 68.6 24.6 295.2 69.8, 24.6 295.2 69.8 24.4 292.8 72.2 24.2 290.4 74.6 24.0 288.0 77.0 24.1 289.0 75.8-1 2(), - 30 40, 40 50 44 40 34 (44 40) 40 52-39 1) 8 52 = 34.0 : 1) :,, 2000. 6
5 75, 2., 1,
76 5,. 61, (30 ) - 61 4 5,. 1., 2.,,,, 3. 4. ( 30 : ),,, 61
5 77, (30 )
78 5,., - () 5 - ( 6 ) ( 5 ) ILO ( 116, 1962 ) 40
5 79 198748 40 46 -, 10 40
80 5, 5,, 2002. 7,, 2000. 6, 40 :?,, 2002. 5,,, 2001. 5,, 23, 2001. 10,, 2000. 9, 5, 2001. 8, 5, CEO Information( 311 ), 2001. 8, 5,, 2002. 8. 2, ( 5), 2001. 1, 5, CEO MEMO( 2002-20 ), 2002. 6, 5, CEO MEMO( 2002-30 ), 2002. 8, 5, 2001. 9,,, 2002
83 5 /. IMF 1998..,.. 5,,.?, 5 (129 139 ). 18,900 3 7,000. 91(1 ) 101 (10).,
84 5, 15 25136 146 (145 ). 126.8. (12 ), 148 158. 10 (,, ), 146 156, 158 168.,. 5,. 5 4.,. 6 5. ILO 25%, 6 1,.,..,
85. 5., 2000 10. (, 2002. 8. 2)
86 5, 5 (129 139 ) 136146 (148 158 ) <>,,, 15 25 136 146 2 3. (2 3,000) 44, (1 3,000) 42 18,900(2001) 3 7,000 ILO, 138 44 8561.6% 44 (48 ), (48), (45 ), (44) 44 (71.7%) (45.3%) (26.4%) 91(1 ) 101 (10 ) = 52 + 17 + 12 + 10 (11 ) 103 113 ( 12 ) 10 (,,, ) : 136(1 ) 146 (20 ) = 104 + 17 + 15 25 (2 1 ) 10 (,,, ) : 126.8 129 139, 145( ), 136, 137 140, 120 150( ), 107 130, 102 109
87 15 ( ) 15 25 ( ), 15 25 (2, 1 ) (136 146 ),. (12 ) ( ), 148 158,, 4 8 5 4 ( ) (), 4 ( 44 40),
88 5,,, ( ) 38, ILO (50% 25%), ILO 25% 50% 50%, 1 16 1 12 5 12, 24 3 3 4 3 31.
89 1 2005 2012 5 3 2006 :, 3., 5, 5, (,,,,, ) 40,,
90 5, 49 1 44, 18, -, 1 12, ( 50%) - 1953 1 8, 1 48, 1989 1 8, 1 44 (, ) ( 20 ),,,
91 49 1 44 18 50 2 1 49 1 49 1, 49 2, 48 1 1 49 1 49 1, 49 2, 56, 12 54 1 1 55 10050
92 5, 57 1 1 1 59 1 10, 9 8 20 61,,, 71 1
93 (2000. 10. 23 ). 2,500 21,., 2000 5 17. 2000 10 2 1,,., 2,000. 40 5,.
94 5,..... o. 2,497, 2,000. o., ()
95. o.,. o. 40 5. o.. o., 5 5,. o.. 2000. 10. 23
96 5, 5, 93.7% 5 (www.fki.or.kr) (www.kfsb.or.kr) 300 5 (10,000, 1,452 ), 93.7% 5. 5 87.4%, 43.7%, 5, 58.4%( 23.3%, 35.1%). 5 17.0%, 8.5%., 5 72.8%... :,
97 : 300 10,000, 1,452 : 2002. 5. 16 5. 29 :. 10,000 1,452, 93.7% 5 74.1% 5-5 87.4% 43.7% - 5, 58.4%( 23.3%, 35.1%)26.6%
98 5, 5, 65.2% 5 5 17.0% - 8.5% 5, 39.3%, 18.4% ( )., (9.3%), (9.3%), (6.9%), (3.4%) 5-74.6%,, 25.4%
99 5 72.8%,,,,. 1. 5 5-93.7%5 ( : 15.5%, : 48.3%, : 29.9%) - 5 (29.9%) -, 98.8%, 95.7%, 83.3% 55
100 5, < 1> 5 15.5% 48.3% 29.9% 6.3% 100% 2. 5 (1) 74.1% 5 -, 6.5%( 5.7%, 0.8%), 19.4% < 2> 5 0.8% 5.7% 19.4% 40.3% 33.8% 100.0% (2) 5 87.4%, 43.7%
101 < 3> 5 43.7% 43.7% 9.0% 3.3% 0.3% 100.0% - 5 (3) 5, 58.4%( 23.3%, 35.1%) 26.6% - 15.0%( 1.6%, 13.4%) 5
102 5, < 4> 5 1.6% 13.4% 26.6% 35.1% 23.3% 100.0% (4) 5, 65.2% 5 ( : 20.8%, : 44.4%) < 5> 5 4.2% 7.1% 20.8% 44.4% 23.5% 100.0% - 5 3. 5 5 17.0% - (149 ) 17.8% (50299 ) 15.5%
103-10% 15% 24.4%20% 30% 19.4%, 30% 15.9% - 24.5%,, 21.5% 19.5%, 19.1% < 6> 5 17.0% 1) 12.4% 2 ) 11.0% 3 ) 11.2% : 1) 2), 3) 5,, 4. 5 5
104 5, 8.5% - 9.3%, 7.2%, -, 12.6%, 10.5% 84.1% 5, < 7> 5 8.5% 84.1% 15.9% 5. 5 5 39.3%, 18.4% () - (9.3%), (9.3%),
105 (6.9%), (3.4%) < 8> 5 39.3% 18.4% 9.3% 9.3% 8.1% 6.9% 5.3% 3.4% 100.0% 6. 5 5-5. 74.6%,, 25.4%
106 5, - 5 < 9> 5 32.8% 25.4% ( ) (21.7%) ( ) (3.7%) 23.1% 18.7% 100.0% 7. 5 5 72.8%,,,, < 10> 5 22.1% 50.7% 27.2% - 56 5
107 10% -,, -, 5
108 5, 5, 89.4% 5 (www.fki.or.kr)( ) 5 (1,162, 222 ), 89.4% 5. 5, 6 5. 5, 117, (126.8 ) 69.6%. 5, 57.2% () (33.8%), 4 (23.4%), 54.7%. 57.3% ILO( ) 25%, 37.0%
109 1, 36.0%6. 5 87.0%, 33.0%. 81.7% 5, ( 47.9%, 33.8%). 5 12.8%, 6.4%... : : ( ) 1,162, 222 : 2002. 7. 12 7. 24 :
110 5,. 1,162 222, 89.4% 5 5, 6 5 5, 117., (126.8 ) 69.6% 5, 57.2% ( ) (33.8%), 4 (23.4%) 5, 54.7% 5, 57.3% ILO( )
111 25% 5, 37.0% 1, 36.0%6 64.7% 5 5 87.0%, 33.0% 5, 47.9%( 13.2%, 34.7%) 33.8% - 5 5, 79.7% 5
112 5, - 5 5, 12.8% - 6.4%. 5 5-89.4% 5 ( : 12.0%, : 28.7%, : 48.7%)
113-5 (48.7%) < 1> 5 48.7% 28.7% 12.0% 10.6% 100% 5 5, 6 5 1. 5 5, 117-56.0% 120 -, (126.8 ) 69.6%
114 5, < 2> 5 110 111 120 121 130 131 140 141 32.4% 23.6% 32.9% 10.6% 0.5% 117 2. 5 5, 57.2% ( ) (33.8%), 4 (23.4%) -, 4 4 23.8% 11.9% < 3> 5 ( ) 33.8% 4 23.8% 4 23.4% 4 11.9% 4 7.1% 100.0% 3. 5 5, 54.7%, 36.3% 12, (12 )
115 < 4> 5 54.7% 12, 36.3% 9.0% 100.0% 4. 5 5, 57.3% ILO( ) 25% -, 4 25%, 50%, 50% 24.2%, 18.5% < 5> 5 ILO( ) 25% 57.3% 4 25%, 50% 24.2% 50% 18.5% 100.0% 5. 5 5, 37.0% 1, 36.0%6
116 5, -, 21 27.0% < 6> 5 1 37.0% 6 36.0% 21 27.0% 100.0% 5 1. 5 (1) 64.7% 5 -, 5.6%( 5.6%, 0%), 29.7% < 7> 5 0% 5.6% 29.7% 43.9% 20.8% 100.0%
117 (2) 5 87.0%, 33.0% < 8> 5 33.0% 54.0% 9.8% 3.2% 0% 100.0% - 5 (3) 5, 81.7% ( 47.9%, 33.8%) - 18.3%( 1.9%, 16.4%) - 5
118 5, < 9> 5 1.9% 16.4% 33.8% 34.7% 13.2% 100.0% (4) 5, 79.7% 5 (: 23.1%, : 56.6%) < 10> 5 0.9% 5.7% 23.1% 56.6% 13.7% 100.0% - 5 2. 5 5 12.8%
119 < 11> 5 12.8% 1) 9.8% 2 ) 6.9% 3 ) 6.1% : 1) 2), 3) - 300 13.3% 300 10.3% - 10% 15% 37.3%20% 30% 16.9%, 30% 4.5% 5,, 3. 5 5 6.4%
120 5, - 300 6.7%, 300 4.6%, 71.2% 5, < 12> 5 6.4% 71.2% 28.8%
121. 5.. ( ).?. 410%, 20%.,. (, )
122 5,?, 2000 10. 2002. 7. 23