11-13 10 148-000 117-0 1 A Study on the Assessment of the Regional Vulnerability to Earthquake Disasters 2002. 12
A Study on the Assessment of the Regional Vulnerability to Earthquake Disasters 2002. 12
: : : 2002. 1 2002. 12 (12 ) : : :
.. 1. 2. 3.. 1. 1) 2) 2. 3. 1) 2) 3) 4. 1) 2) 3)
. 1. 2. 3. 4.
S U M M A RY. Title A Study on the Assessment of the Regional Vulnerability to Earthquake Disasters. Obje ctive s 1. Observation of disastrous urban hazard factor s in Korean urban districts 2. Formulation of survey methods & checklists for the regional vulnerability assessment 3. Proposal of basic dir ection for the regional vulnerability assessment. Co nte nts 1. Study of earthquake damages and regional vulnerability 2. Case study for the seismic vulnerability analysis 3. Analyses of the regional characteristics and the types of vulnerabilities 4. Suggestion of the basic direction for the regional vulnerability assessment. Co nc lus io ns 1. Study of the possible damages caused by earthquake in Korea 2. Analysis of the relationship between earthquake damages and regional vulnerabilities 3. Suggestion of examining items for the assessment of the regional vulnerability 4. Proposal of fundamental direction and checklists for the vulnerability assessment
1 1 1.1 1 1.2 5 2 7 2.1 7 2.1.1 7 2.1.2 8 2.2 13 2.2.1 (San Francisco) 17 2.2.2 ( ) 18 2.2.3 ( ) 19 2.2.4 ( ) 20 2.2.5 (San Ferando) 21 2.2.6 ( ) 22 2.2.7 (Mecico) 23 2.2.8 ( ) 25 2.2.9 (Izmit) 28 2.2.10 ( ) 30 2.2.11 (Gujarat) 33 2.3 36 3 41 3.1 41 3.1.1 41 3.1.2 41 3.2 43 3.2.1 44 3.2.2 45 3.2.3 45 I
3.3 50 3.3.1 50 3.3.2 51 3.3.3 53 4 61 4.1 61 4.1.1 62 4.1.2 63 4.1.3 67 4.2 70 4.2.1 70 4.2.2 74 5 85 5.1 85 5.1.1 85 5.1.2 86 5.1.3 90 5.2 93 5.2.1 93 5.2.2 98 5.3 104 5.3.1 105 5.3.2 111 5.3.3 112 6 113 6.1 113 6.2 117 119 II
2.1 (1905 1942 ) 11 2.2 (1978 2001 ) 11 2.3 12 2.4 1900 14 3.1 42 3.2 46 4.1 63 4.2 64 4.3 66 4.4 1 67 4.5 1 68 4.6 68 4.7 2 68 4.8 2 69 4.9 69 5.1 89 5.2 95 5.3 97 5.4 103 5.5 106 5.6 108 5.7 109 5.8 109 5.9 110 6.1 116 III
IV
1.1 3 2.1 9 2.2 17 2.3 19 2.4 20 2.5 (http :/ / www.scecdc.scec.org/ sanfer.html) 21 2.6 4 ( ) 23 2.7 24 2.8 24 2.9 ( ) 26 2.10 26 2.11 27 2.12 27 2.13 (Wandh) 29 2.14 29 2.15 ( ) 31 2.16 31 2.17 ( ) 32 2.18 32 2.19 34 2.20 34 2.21 ( ) 35 2.22 5 ( ) 35 2.23 37 3.1 48 3.2 49 3.3 51 3.4 55 3.5 56 3.6 57 V
3.7 58 3.8 59 4.1 61 4.2 61 4.3 61 5.1 104 VI
1 1.1,.,.,.,.,.. 3 2,,.,.,,.,., - 1 -
,,..,,.,.,,,,.,.,,,..,,,,,,.. - 2 -
1.1., 2 3.,.,,.,,. - 3 -
.,.,.,,. 1990 (1994), (1994), (1995),.,,.,.,,,. - 4 -
1.2,,.,.. 1,,. 2,... 3,,,.,. 4 ( ) - 5 -
,,,,,,,.,,.,. 4. 5,,,.,. 6.,. - 6 -
2 2.1 2.1.1. ( ).,,. (theory of plate tectonics) (plate),,,., (Inter-Plate Earthquake). (Eurasian Plate)., (Intra-Plate Earthquake),. 7.0, 20 1976 7 ( ).,,,, - 7 -
.,,,. 2.1.2 1905 100., 7.0.,, ( 100 1000 ),. (1), < 2.1> 15 17, 16, 18 20. 1800,. 1-8 -
2, 4.3 400, 5.3 45. 50. 2.1 (2) 1905, 1905 1942 14 533. 1978 2001 21 512. 100km - 9 -
, 5.0 4. 1963 5.8, 1936 7 5.1, 1978 9 5.2,. 1978 10 5.0,, 1000,,. - 10 -
2.1 (1905 1942 ) 1905 12 1918 17 1931 22 1906 7 1919 16 1932 20 1907 2 1920 12 1933 18 1908 2 1921 10 1934 23 1909 1 1922 8 1935 22 1910 1 1923 10 1936 33 1911 4 1924 8 1937 12 1912 2 1925 22 1938 20 1913 3 1926 22 1939 27 1914 7 1927 14 1940 26 1915 11 1928 23 1941 20 1916 12 1929 19 1942 7 1917 19 1930 19 : 533 2.2 (1978 200 1 ) 1978 6 1986 15 1994 25 1979 22 1987 11 1995 29 1980 16 1988 6 1996 39 1981 15 1989 16 1997 21 1982 13 1990 15 1998 32 1983 20 1991 19 1999 37 1984 19 1992 15 2000 29 1985 26 1993 23 2001 43 : 512-11 -
2.3 1978. 9. 16 5.2 ( ) 1978. 10. 7 5.0 ( ) 1980. 1. 8 5.3 - - 1981. 4. 15 4.8 65 1982. 2. 14 5.1 1982. 3. 1 4.7 45 1982. 8. 29 4.0 1983. 9. 17 4.2 1985. 1. 14 4.2 40 1985. 6. 25 4.0 1987. 3. 6 4.0 1992. 1. 21 4.0 50 1992. 11. 4 4.4 230 1992. 12. 13 4.0 70 1993. 3. 28 4.5 230 1994. 4. 22 4.6 175 1994. 4. 23 4.5 175 1994. 4. 23 4.1 150 1994. 7. 26 4.9 100 1995. 7. 24 4.2 30 1996. 1. 24 4.2 80 1996. 12. 13 4.5 20 1997. 6. 26 4.2 9 1998. 2. 10 4.1 90 1999. 1. 11 4.2 15-12 -
2.2 1994 (Northridge) 1 ( ), 1999 (Izmit) ( ), 2001 (Kachchh),.,, 50km..,,.,. < 2.4> 1900,. - 13 -
2.4 1900 1906. 4. 18 San Francisco, U.S. 700 8.3 1906. 8. 16 Valparaiso, Chile 15,000 8.6 1908. 12. 28 Messina, Italy 120,000 7.5 1915. 1. 13 Avezzano, Italy 30,000 7.0 1920. 12. 16 Kansu, China 180,000 8.5 1923. 9. 1 Kanto, Japan 143,000 8.3, 1927. 5. 21 T shighsi, China 200,000 8.3 1932. 12. 26 Kansu, China 70,000 7.6 1935. 5. 31 Quetta, India 60,000 7.5 1939. 1. 24 Chillan, Chile 30,000 7.8 1939. 12. 27 Erzincan, T urkey 23,000 8.0 1946. 5. 31 T urkey 1,300 6.0 1946. 10. 20 Houshu, Japan 2,000 8.4 1948. 6. 28 Fukui, Japan 5,131 7.3, 1949. 8. 5 Pelileo, Ecuador 6,000 6.8 1950. 8. 15 A ssam, India 1,500 8.7 1953. 5. 18 T urkey 1,200 7.2 1954. 9. 9 Orleansvilli, Algeria 1,657 6.7 1956. 6. 10 Afghanistan 2,000 7.6 1957. 7. 2 Iran 2,500 7.4 1957. 12. 13 Iran 2,000 7.2 1960. 2. 29 Agadir, Morocco 12,000 7.5 1960. 5. 21 Chile 5,700 8.5, 1962. 9. 1 Iran 14,000 7.3 1963. 7. 26 Skopje, Yugoslavia 1,100 6.0 1964. 6. 16 Niigata, Japan 7.5,, 1964. 3. 27 Alaska, U.S. 131 8.4 ( ),, 1966. 8. 19 Varto, T urkey 2,529 6.8, 1968. 8. 31 Iran 11,600 7.4-14 -
1970. 5. 28 T urkey 19,086 7.1 1970. 5. 31 P eru 66,000 7.8,, 1971. 2. 9 S an F eran do, U.S. 65 6.6, 1972. 3. 10 Iran 5,374 6.9 1974. 12. 28 P akistan 52,000 6.3 1975. 9. 6 T urkey 200 6.7 1976. 2. 4 Gu at em ala 23,000 7.5 1976. 5. 6 It aly 920 6.5 1976. 7. 27 T ang san, Chin a 250,000 7.8 1976. 8. 16 Mindan ao, Philippin e 5,000 8.0 1976. 11. 24 T urkey 5,000 7.4 1977. 4. 4 Vrancea, Rum ania 2,000 7.2 1978. 9. 16 T abas, Iran 25,000 7.7 1980. 10 Algeria 4,500 7.3 1980. 11 It aly 4,800 7.2 1985. 9. 19 M ecico 20,000 7.8 1988. 12. 7 Arm en aia, S SR 25,000 6.8 1990. 6. 20 Rasht, Iran 45,000 7.7 1990. 7. 16 Lu zon, Philippin e 1,621 7.8 1994. 1. 17 Los Ang eles, U.S. 120 6.9 1994. 6. 6 N eiv a, Colombia 795 6.6 1995. 1. 17 Kobe, Japan 6,308 7.2,,,, 1995. 5. 27 S akhalin, Ru ssia 3,000 7.5 1997. 2. 28 Arm en aia - Iran 3,000 6.1 1997. 5. 10 Iran - Afghanist an 4,000 7.3 1998. 2. 28 Afghanist an 2,323 6.1 1998. 5. 30 Afghanist an 4,000 6.9 1998. 7. 17 P apua N ew Guinea 3,500 7.1 1999. 1. 26 Colombia 2,000 5.8 1999. 8. 17 Izm it, T urk ey 15,400 7.4 1999. 9. 21 Chichi, T aiw an 2,400 7.6 1999. 11. 12 T urkey 400 7.1-15 -
2000. 6. 4 Indon esia 103 7.9 2001. 1. 14 El S alv ador 844 7.6 2001. 1. 26 Gujarat, India 20,003 7.7 2001. 2. 13 El S alv ador 315 6.6 2002. 2. 3 Afy ou, T urkey 44 6.2-16 -
2.2.1 (San Francisco) 1906 8.3.,. 20 30, 15,000.,. 100m., 1989 90km,. 2.2 (Ste inbrugge Collection of the UC Be rke ley Earthquake Enginee ring Research Cente r) - 17 -
2.2.2 ( ) 1923 8.3. ( ),. 11 58,, ( 15 ) 130 45., 25., 0.1. - 18 -
2.2.3 ( ) 1948 7.3 ( ) ( ). 100%, 30% VII ( ). 43, ( ).. 2.3 ( ) - 19 -
2.2.4 ( ) 1964 7.5. ( ),.,,.,. 2.4 (http://www.hrr.mlit.go.jp/bos a i/niigatajis hin/conte nts/c27a.html) - 20 -
2.2.5 (San Ferando) 1971, 1994 1 17 (Northridge).. 6.6,,,,, 1973..,. 2.5 (http://www.s c e cdc.s ce c.o rg/s anfe r.html) - 21 -
2.2.6 ( ) 1971, 1978 7.5. ( ),,.,,. 1980 1980 1995 ( ), 1968 ( )..,,.,. - 22 -
2.2.7 (Mecico) 300km 8.1..,..,., 2 4 20 40. 2.6 4 ( ) - 23 -
2.7 2.8 ( : http://nis e e.be rke le y.e du/me xico/ge ote c h/ce ntra l_me xico_e a rthqua ke.html # Effe cts %20of%20Gro und%20motio ns %20o n%20s o me %20Structure s ) - 24 -
2.2.8 ( ) 1995 1 17 ( ) 7.2 ( ) 6. ( ),,,.., ( ). ( ) ( ), 1 ( ), 1.,,. - 25 -
2.9 ( ) 2.10-26 -
2.11 2.12 ( : http://www.e qe.c om/publicatio ns/kobe /fire fo ll.htm) - 27 -
2.2.9 (Izmit). 1999 8 17 7.4. 6,, 6,,.,. 2,,. (tu la),,., 1,..,., - 28 -
. 2.13 (Wa ndh) 2.14-29 -
2.2.10 ( ) 1999 9 21 ( ) ( ) 7.6 2. 1976 ( 8.3),,,., (Philippine plate) (Eurasian plate), (Indo Australian plates) (Sunda block),., ( ),., 1960.,.,.,. - 30 -
2.15 ( ) 2.16-31 -
2.17 ( ) 2.18-32 -
2.2.11 (Gujarat) 2001 1 26 (Gujarat) (Kachchh) 6.9., 20,005., 95%.,.,,. 4 5, 1., 1.,. - 33 -
2.19 2.20-34 -
2.2 1 ( ) 2.22 5 ( ) - 35 -
2.3,.,,,, 4. ( ),, ( ). ( ). ( ),,.. ( ),., ( ) - 36 -
, ( ). 2.23-37 -
., 2.,.,..,,. ( ) = ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) :, : : :,,, - 38 -
,., ( ) ( ),.,. - 39 -
3 3.1 3.1.1,.,,,,. ( ),,. 3.1.2,. 1968 ( ) ( ), 1972. - 41 -
3.1,, ( ),,,,,, ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, LP, LP,,,,,, ( ) ( ),,, ( ),,,,, ( ),,,,,,, ( ),,,,,, ( ) ( ), ( ) - 42 -
( ) ( ), 97. < 3.1>. 3.2 km km. 70km (Shallow Focus Earthquake), 70%. ( ), ( ). 1995 ( ) 6400 ( ) 20km,. (Hypocenter : ).,. ( ), ( ). ( ),. 1991 ( ) - 43 -
. 3.2.1 ( ),, ( ),. 1963, 1971 ( ). ( ) 1978 ( ), 1985 ( ), 1991., 1994 1996 ( ), 1995 1 ( ). ( ),. - 44 -
3.2.2 (1),,,.. (2) - : ( ), ( ) 4 - : M 7.2 - : 20 30km - ( ) : 40km 20km - : 6 - :, 6m/ 3.2.3 (1), 2,. 1997 < 3.2>. - 45 -
3.2,,,, (,, ) (,, ),, (, ),,, ( ) ( ) ( ),,,,, ( ),,,,,, - 46 -
( ) ( ) ( ),,, ( ),,,,,,,, (p an ic) ( / ) ( / ),, ( ) (, ) ( ), - 47 -
(2) ( ) < 3.1>,. 3.1 ) ) 500m 500m (mesh) ( 7000 ),,. ),.. ), ( ),,. ),,. ),. < 3.2>. - 48 -
3.2-49 -
3.3 3.3.1,. 1975 ( ), 1980 ( ) 1 5, 1998 4., ) : ) : ( ) ) : ) : 4, 4. < 3.3>. - 50 -
3.3 3.3.2 (1), ( ).. - 51 -
(2),., ( ). (3)., (case),,. (4) ( ),. (5), 5 (rank)., ( ). - 52 -
3.3.3 (1). ( ),.,. 10, 20., ( ),, 5. (2) ( ) ( ), ( ) ( ). ( ), 5. ( : ), 1 ( : 60 ). - 53 -
(3),,.,,,,., 5. (4), ( ) ( ),..,,., ( ),. - 54 -
3.4-55 -
3.5-56 -
3.6-57 -
3.7-58 -
3.8-59 -
4 4.1,,, 4. < 4.1>. 4.1-61 -
5,,,., 1995 1 ( ),. ( ),. 4.1.1,,,.,,,. ( ),,,. < 4.1>,.,. - 62 -
4.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 4.1.2 < 4.2> 2. 2,. - 63 -
( ), 60%, 1., 1.0 2 2 75%, 3 ( 4.2 ), 1 2. 4.2 (%) (%) 1 2. 93 41. 9 41. 9 2 2. 31 32. 9 74. 8 3 0. 80 11. 5 86. 3 4 0. 45 6. 40 92. 7 5 0. 38 5. 39 98. 1 6 0. 11 1. 52 99. 6 7 0. 03 0. 38 100. 0-64 -
< 4.3>, 1,,,,. < 4.3>, 1,,, 1,. 2 < 4.3>, < 4.3> 2,,,,, 2-65 -
4.3 1 2 0. 806 0. 254-0. 508 0. 754 0. 121 0. 537 0. 148 0. 819-0. 522 0. 786 0. 921 0. 247 0. 932 0. 188-66 -
4.1.3.,,,.,., 1 < 4.4>,., < 4.5> 1 0.924, 1.,,. 4.4 1 0.622 0.855 0.771 0.322 0.460 0.434 0.104 0.076-0.013 0.323 0.368 0.386-67 -
4.5 1 Ap p rox F Pr > F 1 0.924 0.924 837.275 0.0001 2 0.393 0.392 98.855 0.0001 3 0.117 0.116 21.771 0.0001 4.6 1 5.847 0.968 0.968 2 0.182 0.030 0.998 3 0.014 0.002 1.000 2 < 4.7>,, < 4.8>.,. 4.7 2 0.211-0.016 0.594-0.021 0.082-0.020 0.105-0.067 0.448 0.322 0.406 0.368 0.141 0.023 0.230 0.023-68 -
4.8 2 Ap p rox F Pr F 1 0.719 0.718 254.081 0.0001 2 0.540 0.539 133.759 0.0001 3 0.115-10.722 0.0001 4 0.018-0.985 0.3210 4.9 1 1.068 0.7156 0.7156 2 0.411 0.2752 0.9908 3 0.014 0.0090 0.9998 4 0.000 0.0002 1.0000-69 -
4.2 4.2.1 ( ),.,..,,.,,,.,. 1960 1970., ), ) 1960 1970, ) 1980.. - 70 -
(1) 20 30 19 (1910 1945),. (1950 1953),,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,. (2) 1960 1970,.,.,,, 4 5., (1960), - 71 -
(1961), (1962), (1963), (1964), (1965). (1961) 10 (1965), 30 (1966)..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. 1970,,., ( 1, 2 )., (, 1970-1971, ), (, 1970-1971, ), ( 1, 1971-1974, ), ( 1-4, 1975, / 5, 1976, ), (1975, ). (3) 1980,,.,. - 72 -
, 10., (1982-1985), (1985-1989), (1983-1988),,,. 1990,.,,. - 73 -
4.2.2,.,,.,..,,.,.,,. - 74 -
LPG, LPG ( ).., LPG,, LPG. ( ) 4~6m,, (,,, ).,,.,.. - 75 -
- 76 -
- 77 -
- 78 -
- 79 -
- 80 -
- 81 -
- 82 -
- 83 -
5 5.1 5.1.1.,,,,,,,.,.,,. - 85 -
5.1.2,., 3 4. ( 15 ).,. ( 14 )..., ( 16 ). - 86 -
.. ( 18 ).,..,.. ( 19 ).,.,,, - 87 -
. 1977 1, 5, 6 (2002 2006).. < 5.1>. - 88 -
5.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -, -, - - -, - - - 89 -
5.1.3,. (1) 1 (1972 1981),,,., 4. 2 (1982 1991) (1987 1991),.,,. 3 (1992 2001),,. 4 (2000 2020),,. 4,. (2). - 90 -
,,,,,, ( ),. ( ),,. (3),,.,,,,,, 3.,. 1 3,,.,.,,,,. - 91 -
,..... - 92 -
5.2 5.2.1,,.,,,,.,,,.,.,, 2001 1 8 ( ),..,. - 93 -
(1) 6, 20, - -, - - - - ( 7 ). " " ( 12 ). - - - - - - - 8,, " " ( 13 ). - - - - - - 94 -
(2), < 5.2>. 5.2,,,,,, GIS (,,, ),,,,,,,,,,, (,,, ), (,,,, ), (,,,, ) (,,,, ), (,,, ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - 95 -
(3).,,,,, < 5.3>. - 96 -
5.3, (,, ),,,, ( ),,, (, ), (,, ),,,, (, ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ),,,,, ( ), ( ), (, ),,, ( ) ( ),,,, (, ),,,,, (,,,,,,,, ), (, ) (,,,, ),,,,,,,, ( ),,, (,, ), (, ),,, (,,,, ),, ( ),, - 97 -
5.2.2,..,.,,. (1) ( ). ( ),,,.,. (2),,,,,,. - 98 -
,.,.,...,..,., ( )..,.,.,,,. - 99 -
.,..,,,. (3),.,,.,,,,.,. - 100 -
(4),.,..,,,.,,..,,.,,,.,. - 101 -
(5).,,, LPG.,,,.,,,, ( ),. < 5.4>.,. - 102 -
5.4,,,,,,, ( ),, (,, ),, (,, ),, (, ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (, ) (,, ), (, ),,, (,,, ) (,, ),, (, ),,,, - 103 -
5.3.,, 5.1-104 -
,.,,.. 5.3.1 ( ),.,.,.,,. (soil profile type) 5 ( 5.5 ), - 105 -
. ( 5.5 ).,, 5.5 30m (m/ s) (N (1) ) (kpa) 760 - - 360 760 > 50 > 100 180 360 15 50 50 100 180 < 15 < 50 : (1) N : (2000) - 106 -
,. 1988, 2000 6, 10,000m2, 1,,, 5,000m2. 5 ( ),,., ( ), - - - - - D E ( 5.9 ) - 107 -
5.6 38 ( ). 2002. 8. 26 8 1 ( ). 1. 32 ( ) 38 2 1. 1. 3 2. 1,000m 2 3. 13m 4. 9m 5. ( 2001. 10. 20 ) 10m ( ) 1., 5 ( 1/ 10 1 ). 1. 6 2. 10,000m 2 3. 1) 4. 2) 1) 32 2 3 " " 5.7 5.8 1. 2) 32 2 4 " " 5. - 108 -
5.7,, (,,,,,, ),,,, (,,,,,,,,,, ),, (,,,,,,,,,, ), (,,,,,,,,,, ), 5.8-1,000m 2,,,,,,,,,, - 15-5,000m 2,,,,, 1-5,, 2 1-109 -
5.9 A B C D E,,,,,, - 110 -
5.3.2.,,.., LPG,, ( ),.,.. 4m 6m, LPG, - 111 -
5.3.3.,,,.. ( ) ( ) 1m 2,..,..,,. (,, ), (,,, ). - 112 -
6 6.1 1978 21, 5.0.,.,.,.,,,,.., - 113 -
,,..,.,,,,. -,,, -,,,,,,. -,,,, (, ) (, ). -,. -,,, - 114 -
.. -.,,. -,,. -,, LPG,. -,. -,,,,. ( ),. - 115 -
6.1., 6.1, ( ),, (,, ), (, ) (,,, D ) (, ) (, ) ( ),,,, (, ),, - 116 -
6.2,.,.,.,,,.,,.,.,,., - 117 -
,. - 118 -
,,, 1999,,, 2000, 1999. 8. 17,, 1999, 1999. 9. 21 ( ),, 1999, 2001,, 2001,, 2000,, 2002,, 2000, 20, 2001,,, 2000,,, 1985,,, 1988,,, 1986,,, 1998 4,,, 1999,, 1998,,, 1999,,, 1996,,, 1996,,, 1996. - 119 -
, ( 4 ), 1998,, 1993,, 1997, ( 5 ), 1995, ( 5 ), 1997, 1995, 1996-120 -
1. 2. 3. NIDP- 2002-10 ( ) 2002. 12. 4. / 5. 2002. 1 2002. 12 6. / / /FAX 7. ( ) 253-42 6 : (02) 3274-2241 2 : (02) 3274-2243,, ( ) 8. / / / /FAX 9. 10.,.,.,. 11.,, 12. 13. 14. 15. 135
REPORT DOCUMENT A T ION PA GE 1. Report No. 2. Project Class ification 3. Report Date NIDP- 2002-10 (Research Report) Policy Dec. 2002 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Period Covered A Study on the Assessment of the Regional Vulnerability to Earthquake Disasters Dec. 2002 Jan. 2002 6. Performing Organization Name and Address 7. Author(s) Nationa l Institute for Dis aster Preve ntion 253-42 Gongdeok- Dong, Mapo- Ku, Seoul 121-719, Korea Phone : +82-2- 3274-2241 2 Fax : +82-2- 3274-2243 Jung, Gil Ho Kim, Hyun Ju Park, Byung Cheol (NIDP) 8. Co- performing Organization Name and Address 9. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 10. Abstract T he disaster prev ention plannin g is a kin d of trial t o accurately defin e th e degree of vuln erability of an area and t o m inim ize t otal dam ages cau sed by disaster. T o do this, th e qu antifying of the area ' s vulnerability is v ery im portant. N ev ertheless, the fundam ental surv ey m ethods an d checklist s hav e not y et been properly devised in Korea. T his study proposes surv ey it em s and m ethods for th e regional vuln erability as ses sm ent. In addition, the purposes of m easuring v ariou s kin ds of vuln erable fact or s an d determ ining th e degree of the vuln erability t o earthqu ake disa st er s are su gg est ed. 11. Keywords Disaste r preve ntion pla nning, Vulne ra bility to ea rthqua ke disa ste rs, Re giona l vulne ra bility assess me nt 12. Security Classfication 13. No. of Pages 14. Distribution Statement 15. Price Unclassified 135 Released Unlimited
2002 12 1 2 1-7 1 9 253-42 6 T el 02)3274-2241 2 Fax 02)3274-2243