歯음란물사업자책임(방석호).PDF

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "歯음란물사업자책임(방석호).PDF"

정산 박
7 years ago
Views:

1 ( ) I. II III IV ( ) 2. state action V. < > - 1 -

2 I. PC, 1).,, PC.,. on - line.,..,,?.. II. 1.,,,,, p ,

3 , 53 16, 2 2 ( 71 ). 243,.,, 2).,,,, , 3) ,, 3 2.,

4 4) ( ). 243,, 48 2.,,,. ( 16 4)..,. 5).,, ( 16 4),,, 4., 14 ( ) (1 300 ) (95 16),

5 ,. 6),. 7) 8) BBS,,. mechanism IP 9),, PC, UseNet New s Group 10) 11) common carrier Sysop. 6.,,,, IP ISP DB. 8. IP ISP IP. 9. FT P (file tansfer protocol),.,. 10.,. 11., pp , 11 9, ( )

common carrier Sysop. 6.,,,, 3. 7.. IP ISP DB. 8.

6 , Melissa Virus e- mail.,,. (IP ) (chilling effect ), 12). 96 (T elecommunications Act ) 5 CDA (Communications Decency Act ) (good faith ), (verified credit card), (debit account ), (adult access code), (adult personal identification number ) indecent ', 'patently offensive '. (overbroad), (chilling effect ) 13 ). (obscene) CDA I (Reno v. ACLU, 117 S.Ct (1997)) ( 5) (chilling effect).,, 1, 1997 ( ),, 3, 1998 ( ). 13. Reno v. ACLU, 117 S.Ct (1997) - 6 -

), (adult access code), (adult personal identification number ) indecent ', 'patently offensive '.

7 (IuKDG). ISP. 3,,. 2. PC, ISP..,...,. ( 31 ),,

8 , ( 33 2 ),. ( 3 ).,, 33? ISP,. 33 2,,.. 14), 15) ,,,. 15.,

9 III , 37 2,., 1, Congress shall make no law - - abridging the freedom of speech ?., 21 2 (censor ship), ) , ( )

abridging the freedom of speech - -. 1 1?

10 ,,.,,. 13 ( ) 17), (licensing ) 18 ), (Stamp Act of 1711). 19) liberty ' (licensing system ) 20). 17. ' seditious libel'. T. Barton Carter, Marc A. Franklin, Jay B. Wright, T he First Amendment and the Fifth Estate (4th edition) pp.12-14, Licensing Act 1694 (seditious libel). Stationer 's Company', (piracy), British Stamp Act of Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965) (obscene) (license)

Wright, T he First Amendment and the Fifth Estate (4th edition) pp.12-14, 1996. 18.

11 . 21) ' overbroadness ', 'void for vagueness ', 'least restrictive alternative ' ' speech '., unr eas onab le search and seizure ( 4 ), d ue process of law ( 5 ). speech ( ad hoc balancing ' ) 22) 1 (speech ). (obscenity ). "the freedom of speech" political speech 23 ) (95 16) 21., p. 298, New York T imes Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971), CNN v. Noriega, 498 U.S. 976 (1990). 22. political/ non- political speech, commercial/ non- commercial speech, 'clear and present danger ' ' actual malice' political speech (balancing) Alexander Meiklejohn

"the freedom of speech" political speech 23 ).. 1998 4 30 (95 16) 21., p. 298, 1997. New York T imes Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971), CNN v.

12 ,. 21 4, (speech ). state action looks like government theory ',. 3,. 37 2,

13 .. (preferred position ) 24). (chilling effect ) (95 16) 1.. IV ( ) PC ), 24. United States v. Carolene Products Co, 304 U.S. 144 (1938) Stone. (double standard)., ( 9 ) p. 312, , 2.,,, 3., 4. 3, 5.,

14 ,.,,,..,..,,,. Cyber Promotions America Online 26 ) ALO (state action ),., 53 16, ( 53 2). 26. Cyber Promotions, Inc. v. America Online, Inc., 948 F. Supp. 436 (E.D.Pa. 1996)

15 , state action '. 2. state action state action. 27) 'life, liberty, property ' 14. (public function ) 1 28 ). state action, ' ' (public function ) (relationship).,,, state action 29). 27.,, (licensing) state action. 28. Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507 (1976).. ( , , , )

state action, ' ' (public function ) (relationship).,,, state action 29). 27.

16 , state action. V.?.. 103,,. ISP mechanism.,., 29. John E. Now ak, Ronald D. Rotunda, J. Nelson Young, Constitutional Law (2nd edition) pp ,

17 ,.,. < >,, 11 9, ( ), ( 9 ),, 1997.,,, ,, 1, 1997 ( ) ,, 3, 1998 ( ),,,,, 98-03, ,,, 1997 T. Barton Carter, Marc A. Franklin, Jay B. Wright, T he Fir st Am endm ent and the Fifth E state (4th edition ), T he F oundation Pr ess, 1996 John E. Now ak, Ronald D. Rotunda, J. Nelson Young, Con stitutional Law (2nd edition), W est Publishing Company,

18 T hom as J. Sm edinghoff (editor ), Online Law, Addison- Wesley Dev eloper s Pr ess, 1996 William W. Van Alstyne, Interpr etation s of the Fir st Amendm ent, Duke Univ er sity Press, 1984 A CLU, Is Cyber space Burning? How Rating and Blocking Pr oposals May T orch Fr ee Speech on the Internet, w w w.aclu.org/ issues/ cyber/ burning.html , Censorship in a Box, w ww.aclu.org/ issues/ cyber/ box.html Cyber - Right s & Cyber - Liberties (UK) Report : "Who W atches the Wat chm en : Part II- A ccount ability & Effective Self- Regulation in the Information Age, September 1998, ww w.cyber - rights.org/ watchmen - ii.htm , 'Who Watches the Watchmen : Internet Content Sy stem s, and Privatised Cen sor ship ', November 1997, w ww.leeds.ac.uk/ law/ pgs/ yaman/ watchmen.htm. EU Commission, A ction Plan on promoting safe u se of the Internet, w w w 2.echo.lu/ legal/ en/ intetnet/ actplan.html

How Rating and Blocking Pr oposals May T orch Fr ee Speech on the Internet, http:// w w w.aclu.org/ issues/ cyber/ burning.html - - - - - -, Censorship in a Box, http:// w ww.aclu.org/ issues/ cyber/ box.

사이버음란물 규제의 합헌성에 관한 한ㆍ미 법리 고찰 A Comparative Study on the Constitutionality of Regulation against Cyber Pornography in Korea and the United States

사이버음란물 규제의 합헌성에 관한 한ㆍ미 법리 고찰 A Comparative Study on the Constitutionality of Regulation against Cyber Pornography in Korea and the United States 정 완 * (Choung, Wan) < 차 례 > Ⅰ. 서언 Ⅱ. 사이버음란물의 개념과 규제의 필요성

歯음란물사업자책임(방석호).PDF

歯음란물사업자책임(방석호).PDF