ๆญฏbok9.PDF
|
|
- ์ฉํ ๊ตฌ
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 - - * ** *** <>,., 1995,,,,.,,,.,,,. : G2 :,,, *..,. ** (E-m ail: yslee@m ail.h an gkon g.ac.kr) *** (E-m ail: cllee@tiger.korea.ac.kr)
2 <> < > < >
3 ) (1999b)(ROA).,. (1999a). (productive efficiency),,.. 2) (1999a, 1999b) 1) ,,, ,,,,. BIS,..,,,, BIS. 2) (1995),,,, (1999), (1993), H ao, et al.(1999)
4 ., (decomp osition),,,,..,.,.,...,,,,., (1998)., (1999). 3),,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,. 3)
5 4.,..., (divisia). (F*)(Y*) (total factor productivity),. 4) (F*) (Y*) ( F *, Y * ). Y * = i 1i Y i F * = j 2j X j, (1) 4)
6 Y * = i 1i Y i F * = j 2j X j, (2) 1i (revenu e) i, 2jj. Y i X j i j, Y i X j i j. 5). T F P = Y * F *, T F P = Y * - F * (3) (PFP, partial factor productivity) ( F j )( Y * ). P F P = Y * F j, P F P = Y * - F j (4) (discrete data) (5)(tornqvist). log F = log ( F t F t - 1 ) = 1 2 j log Y = log ( Y t Y t - 1 ) = 1 2 i ( s jt + s j, t - 1 ) log ( X jt X j, t - 1 ) (r it + r i,t - 1 ) log ( Y it Y i, t - 1 ) (5) (6) 5), 1i, 2j. 1i = P i Y i / ij, i P i Y i j i P i Y i, 2j = w j X j / j w j X j, P i w j w j X j
7 X jt tj( X j ), s jt = w jt X jt / j w jt X jt t j( X j ), Y it t i( Y i ), r it = P it Y it / i P it Y it t i( Y i ). (5)(6) (7)(8) T F P = log (Y ) - log ( F ) (7) P F P = log (Y ) - log (F j ) (8).. 6). 7),.,.,.., 6) Output M easurement in the Service Sectors, edited by Griliches, Zvi, NBER(1992). 7) Sealey and Lindley(1977), Berger, H anw eck and Humphrey(1986). Master(1987), Berger, H anweck and H umphrey(1986), (1990)
8 ,..,. 8) 30%,.. 9),,,,, ( ). 10),,,,.,,. 11) 8) Humphrey(1991). 9) (1995),,. 10) (1990), (1992),,. (1993),, (1993), (1995),,. 11).,,, (1999)6,
9 .,,,. 12)., <1>. 2. <2>.., , %8.0%, % %2.5%. 12).,,,, 5. (normal loans) (precautionary loans) 36., 6,. (doubtful) (estimated loss) (non-performing loans) ,,, 6 3.-,
10 ,,, , <1>
11 , % , -1.8% <2> : (3)(4)
12 ,. 1997,.,,,,.. ( ) ( )., 3,.. (analysis of variance). <3>(a), < 1>,., %, %.., %,,,,,
13 -1.0%., %, -1.7%..,,. <3> (a), (0.99) 1.6(0.21) 0.1(0.87) (0.00)*** 7.6(0.00)*** 5.5(0.01)*** (0.00)*** 9.1(0.00)*** 6.5(0.00)*** (0.61) 3.1(0.05)** 0.3(0.75) : F-. ( ) P-v alu e, *10%, ** 5 %, ***1%
14 , , 1%,.. (b), (0.97) 5.2(0.01)*** 2.7(0.07)* (0.01)*** 4.9(0.01)*** 2.5(0.09)* (0.01)*** 5.9(0.00)*** 3.0(0.06)* (0.80) 5.3(0.01)*** 3.0(0.06)* : F-. ( ) P-v alu e, *10%, ** 5 %, ***1%., 1995 (< 1> )
15 ,. 13) (analysis of variance). <3>(b) < 2>., %, % %., , %-1.1%, 2.9% %-2.6%1.0% ,. 13),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,.,,, BIS
16 .,.,, %, 10% ,, 1% ,, 10%., ,, ,..,,, ),,,, 14) (1997), 4(1997)
17 CDATM,,..,. Denny, Fu ss & Waverman (1981), (9). 15) T F P = i [ 1 - e y i ] Y c - e P er P er - e R at io d Rat io - e IT IT - e B ran ch Bran ch - T (9), Y c = 1 2. i ( i, t + i, t - 1) ln ( Y i, t Y i, t - 1 ), i, t = e y i, t ie y i, t, e y i = ln g ln y i, e P er = ln g ln P er, e R at io = ln g Rat io, e IT = ln g ln IT, e B ran ch = ln g ln Bran ch (10) (9) ( i [ ( 1 - e Y i ] Y ]).. ( - e P er P er).,.,. ( - e R at io d R at io). 15) (9) < 1>
18 . ( - e IT IT ).. ( - e B ran ch Bran ch ).., ( - T ),., (11)(multi-product joint cost function). 16) C = g ( W,Y, P er, Rat io, IT, Branch, T ) min ( WX : F ( X, Y, P er, Rat io, IT, Branch, T ) = 0) (11), W, Y, X, Per, Ratio, IT, Branch. 17) X * i 16) ( ) ( ).,., (qu asi-fixed input).. (),,,. 17),, PC CD, ATM,,
19 (12). C * = g ( W 1,..., W n, Y 1,... Y m, P er, Rat io, IT, Branch, T ) (12), 1,.., n, 1,.. m (12) 2(13) 2 (translog cost function). ln C * = a 0 + i a i ln y i + j b j ln w j is a is ln y i ln y s j l b j l ln w j ln w l + ij c ij ln y i ln w j + d B ln Branch d B B ln Branch ln Branch + i d ib ln y i ln Branch + j d jb ln w j ln Branch (13) + d P er ln P er + d R at io Rat io + d IT ln IT + t t + f f, t f,. 18) t f. CD ATM.,.,. IT i, t = T = 0 ( 1 - i ) I i, t - = ( 1 - ) IT i, t I i, t, = 18) (13) a 0. a 0, (13) (fixed effect model). a 0 (random), a 0 a 0 = a 1 + i. a 1, i0, (random variable). (13)(generalized least squ ared method) (random effect model)
20 (bias).. 19) (Shephard's Lemm a) (share equation) Sj. ln C * ln w j = S j = b j + j b j l ln W l + i c ij ln Y i + jd ib ln Branch (14) (13)(14), 1. a is = a s i, b j l = b lj, j b j = 1, j b j l = 0, j c ij = ,,,, CDATM ~97. 20) (13) (14) 19). C/ T = ( ln C( r) - ln c(s))/ (r - s ), rs. 20) ( + ) ~
21 SUR(seemingly unrelated regression). 21) <4>(a)(b). R , 0.81~0.86., (Per) (+),. (Ratio) (+),. (IT) (+), <5>.,,..,., %. (1993) (1998). 21) (14),,,. SUR, (singularity)
22 <4> (a) <a-1> RMSE R2 2 P-valu e <a-2> ln (y 1) 0.603(1.382) ln (p 1p 2) 0.003(0.002) ln (y3y3) 0.004(0.004) ln (y2) (0.708) ln (p 1p 3) (0.003)** ln (b1) 0.724(1.804) ln (y3) 0.190(0.392) ln (p 2p 2) 0.093(0.005)** ln (b1b1) 0.156(0.178) ln (p 1) 0.307(0.049)** ln (p 2p 3) (0.004)** ln (y1b1) (0.126) ln (p 2) 0.706(0.089)** ln (p 3p 3) 0.133(0.005)** ln (y2b1) (0.068) ln (p 3) (0.089) ln (y1p 1) 0.003(0.005) ln (y3b1) 0.099(0.039)* ln (y 1y 1) 0.217(0.141) ln (y1p 2) (0.010)* ln (p 1b1) 0.023(0.004)** ln (y 1y2) (0.087) ln (y1y3) 0.022(0.010)* ln (p 2b1) 0.041(0.008)** ln (y 1y3) (0.034)* ln (y2p 1) (0.003)** ln (p 3b1) (0.008)** ln (y2y2) 0.160(0.078)* ln (y2p 2) (0.006)* ln (IT) 0.037(0.012)** ln (y2y3) 0.070(0.023)** ln (y2p 3) 0.053(0.006)** ln (Per) 0.450(0.098)** ln (y3y3) (0.015) ln (y3p 1) 0.002(0.002) Ratio 0.695(0.372) ln (p 1p 1) 0.035(0.004)** ln (y3p 2) (0.005) : 1) (12). ln C * = a 0 + i a i ln y i + j b j ln w j isa is ln y i ln y s + 1 jl b 2 jl ln w j ln w l + ij c ij ln y i ln w j + d B ln Branch d BB ln Branch ln Branch + i d ib ln y i ln Branch + j d jb ln w j ln Branch + d P er ln P er + d Rat io Rat io + d IT ln IT + t t + f f 2) ()*5 %, **1%
23 ,,., %, -4.74%.,. (increasing return to scale). (b) <b-1> RMSE R 2 2 P-value e <b-2> ln (y 1) 3.117(1.837) ln (p 1p 2) 0.003(0.003) ln (y3y3) (0.008) ln (y2) - ln (p 1p 3) (0.005)** ln (b1) (2.689) ln (y3) (0.514) ln (p 2p 2) 0.092(0.007)** ln (b1b1) (0.321)* ln (p 1) 0.186(0.067)** ln (p 2p 3) (0.006)** ln (y 1b1) 0.611(0.217)** ln (p 2) 0.821(0.132)** ln (p 3p 3) 0.133(0.007)** ln (y2b1) (0.143) ln (p 3) (0.122) ln (y1p 1) 0.003(0.009) ln (y3b1) (0.083) ln (y 1y 1) - ln (y1p 2) (0.022) ln (p 1b1) 0.022(0.006)** ln (y 1y2) (0.121)* ln (y1y3) 0.026(0.019) ln (p 2b1) 0.032(0.015)* ln (y 1y3) (0.084) ln (y2p 1) (0.006)** ln (p 3b1) (0.013)** ln (y2y2) 0.307(0.132)* ln (y2p 2) (0.015) ln (IT) (0.046) ln (y2y3) 0.048(0.072) ln (y2p 3) 0.053(0.014)** ln (Per) (0.227) ln (y3y3) 0.003(0.045) ln (y3p 1) (0.004) Ratio 0.908(0.624) ln (p 1p 1) 0.035(0.006)** ln (y3p 2) 0.004(0.009)
24 <5> , 1991~ % % %.,.., 1991~ %
25 (productivity p aradox) CDATM. 22) C DATM.,, ), 1995~97() ()., 4.6%, 4.8%.., 3.7%-0.53%.,., -3.9%, -1.1%..., -1.1%, -1.4%.. 22) (1999), (1999). 23)
26 , -0.8%, 0.1%.,., 3,. < 6>(a)., 1991~97.,,,,.,,,,,..,,.,, 1%., 7.86%, 4.68%4.43%...,.,,
27 <6> (a), (0.99) 1.6(0.21) 0.1(0.87) (0.00)*** 3.7(0.03)** 11.3(0.00)*** (0.09)* 5.0(0.01)*** 5.0(0.01)*** (0.00)*** 1.2(0.30) 1.2(0.30) (0.06)* 1.4(0.25) 1.6(0.21) (0.00)*** 4.5(0.02)** 33.5(0.00)*** : F-. ( ) P-valu e, *10%, **5 %, ***1%
28 (b), (0.97) 5.2(0.01)*** 2.7(0.07)* (0.16) 1.6(0.20) 2.7(0.08)* (0.96) 6.7(0.00)*** 6.7(0.00)*** (0.06) 0.8(0.46) 0.8(0.46) (0.66) 0.05(0.95) 0.07(0.93) (0.52) 7.0(0.00)*** 8.3(0.00)*** : F-. ( ) P-valu e, *10%, **5 %, ***1%.,,,,., 10%, 4.74%,
29 4.55%, 3.51%.,.,,., 1%, -1.27%, -0.85%, -0.52%.,,.,,.,,. 10%., -1.49%, -1.12%, -0.92%. CDATM.,.,,. 1% -4.52%, -6.52%, -3.65%
30 . () (),,,..,, 1991~97.,..,,...,., ,
31 ,. <6-b>, , ,. 5.1%,, 3.9%4.7%., 5.9%,, 3.3%5.0%.,.,,.,.,.,
32 .,.., , ,,,,,.,, , ,,.,.,, CD, ATM.,
33 ,,.,.,,.,,,, 1991~97,.,,..,,..,,,.,,.,
34 < >, :,, ,,, ,,,,, http :/ / fsc.go.kr / kfsc/ board/ 05/ 17accept.htm, ,,, http :/ / fsc.go.kr/ kfsc / board/ 05/ 18stan d ard2.htm, ,,,, 8, 1997., :,, X- ( ), 1995, ,,,,,,, 8, 1997.,,, , - M alm qu ist, 1999, 1999.,, 72,, , p p ,,, ,, 1999, 1999.a,, 6 1,, 1999b.,,,, :
35 Fourier Flexible, 1998, 1999, :,, , pp.20-42,,,, 1992, pp , BIS,, ,,,, Berger, A. N., G. A. Hanw eck, and D. B. Humphrey, "Comp etitive Viability in Bankin g : Scale, Scop e, an d Produ ct Mix Econ omics," Journal of M onetary Economics 20, 1987, p p Denny, M., M. Fu ss and L. Waverm an, "Th e Measu rem ent an d Interpretation of Total Factor Productivity in Regu lated In du stries, w ith an Ap plication to Canadian Telecomm unications", In Cow in g, T.G. and R.E. Stevenson (ed s.) Productivity M easurement in Regulated Industry, Readin g, M.A. 1981, Academic Press. Gilber, Aliton, R., Bank Market Structure an d Com p etition, A Su rvey, Journal of M oney Credit and Banking, N ovember Part, 1984, pp Grilich es, Zvi, Output M easurement in the Service Sectors, N BER, H ao, Jon ath an, William H u nter, an d W on K. Yan g, "D eregu lation an d Efficien cy : Th e Case of Priv ate Korean Banks," p resen ted on th e Con feren ce of Korean Fin ance A ssociation, 1999, p p Hu m p hrey, D. B., "Why Do Estim ate of Bank Scale Econ om ies Differ?" Economic Review 76, F.R.B. of Richm on d, 1990, p p Hu m p hrey, D. B., Produ ctivity in Bankin g an d Effects from Deregu lation," Economic Review, F.R.B. of Richm on d, 1991, p p Kim, Mosh e, an d Jacob Weiss, Total Factor Produ ctivity Grow th in Bankin g: Th e Israeli Bankin g Sector , Journal of Productivity A nalysis, Vol 1, 1989 pp Oniki, H ajim e, Tae H oon Ou m, Rodn ey Steven son, Yim in Zhan g, "Th e Productivity Effects of th e Liberalization of Jap an ese Telecom mu nication
36 Policy", The Journal of Productitivity A nalysis, 5, Pin dyck, R. S. an d J. J. Rotemberg, "Dyn amic Factor Dem an d s an d Effects of En ergy Price Shocks, A merican Economic Review, Vol 73, 1983, pp Sealey, C. W. and J. T. Lindley, "Inputs, Outputs and a Theory of Production an d Cost at Dep ository Fin ancial In stitu tion s, Journal of Finance 32, 1977, pp
37 < 1> Denny, Fuss & Waverman (1981),. (1). C = g ( Y, W, P er, R at io, IT, Bran ch, T ) (1) C, Y, W, Per, Ratio, IT, Branch, T (tim e). (1) (time), (2). dc dt = i + g y i y i T + g w j j w j T + g P er g Rat io g + Rat io T IT P er T IT T + g Bran ch Bran ch T + g T (2). () 2( 1 C ), (3) 1 C dc dt = i ln C ln y i y i + j w j x j C w j + ln C ln P er P er + ln C Rat io d R at io + ln C ln IT IT (3) + ln C ln Bran ch Bran ch + 1 C dg dt e y i = ln g ln y i, e P er = ln g ln P er, e R at io = ln g R at io e IT = ln g ln IT, e B ran ch = ln g ln Bran ch, (3)
38 C = i e Y i Y i + j w j x j C + e IT IT + e B ran ch Bran ch + T w j + e P er P er + e R at io d Rat io (4), C = j w j x j t, (5). C= 1 C dc dt = j w j x j C w j + j w j x j C x j (5) (5)(4) (6). j w j x j C x i = i e Y i Y i + e P er P er + e R at io d R at io + e IT IT + e B ran ch Bran ch + T (6) (6-1), (7) (7) (8). 24) F = j w i x j C x j (6-1) T F P = Y - F (7) T F P = i [ 1 - e y i ]Y i - e P er P er - e R at io d Rat io - e IT IT - e B ran ch Bran ch - T (8) 24) (8)11 (9)
39 < 2> < 1>
40 < 2>
41 < 3>
42 < 4>
ๆญฏProduct1.PDF
A B,, D, E, F...... A.. B.. D. E. F. .,. 1980,, 1990..,.....,.., (price-cap regulation) - 1 - .,,,.,..... 3SLS... - 2 - ...,. 1). Denny, Fuss & Waverman(1981) Divisia,,. Kiss(1983), Denny, et al., Tornqvist,.
<C7D1B1B9B0E6C1A6BFACB1B8C7D0C8B828C0CCC1BEBFF85FC0CCBBF3B5B75FBDC5B1E2B9E9292E687770>
ํ๊ตญ ์ฆ๊ถํ์ฌ์ ํจ์จ์ฑ ๋ถ์ ์ด์ข
์* ์ด์๋** ์ ๊ธฐ๋ฐฑ*** โ
. ์ ๋ก 1990๋
์ดํ ์ฆ๊ถ์์ฅ์ ๊ฐ๋ฐฉํ ๋ฐ ์์จํ๊ฐ ์ง์ ๋์ด๊ฐ๊ณ ์๋ ๊ณผ์ ์์ 1997๋
12์ ์ธํ ์๊ธฐ์ฌํ๊ฐ ๋ฐ์ํ๊ฒ ๋์๊ณ , ์ดํ ์ฆ๊ถํ์ฌ์ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์กฐ์ ๊ฐ์ํ, ์ธ๊ตญ๊ณ ์ฆ๊ถํ์ฌ์ ์ง์
ํ๋ ๋ฐ IT๊ธฐ์ ์ ๋ฐ์ ์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ์ฆ๊ถ ์จ๋ผ์ธ๊ฑฐ๋์ ํ๋, ์ธ๊ตญ์ธ์ ํฌ์ํ๋ ์์ ์ฒ ํ์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ์ธ๊ตญ์ธ ๊ฑฐ๋๋น์ค์
ๆญฏ์ ์ฉ์นด๋์์ฅํ์.PDF
2002. 11-4 - ,.. : Tel 3771-0230 / Fax 3771-0130 / E- mail ajh@fki.or.kr - 5 - - - 1. / 4 2. / 4 2.1 2.2 2.3 3. / 7 3.1 3.2 3.3 4. / 17 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 5. / 30 5.1 5.2 5.3 6. / 35 : / 39-6
2
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 10, Number 1, March 2011 : pp. 1~24 ๊ตญ๋ดํ๋ ฅ๋ฐ์ ์ฐ์
์๋ํ์ฐ๋ฃ์์๋ณธ์๋์ฒด์ฑ๋ถ์ 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 F F P F P F ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln 6 ln ln ln ln ln 7 ln
๋ถ์ ์ธต์์ฐ๊ด๋ฆฌ์ฌ์ ์ด์(์ต์ข ).hwp
29. 1..,.. (Federal Reserve Board: FRB) 10 (net worth) 10%. LIMRA FRB (Survey of Consumer Finance: SCF) (financial asset). 1) 25 25, 25., 25 50 (m ass afflu ent), 50 100 (afflu ent), 100 500 (high-net-w
์ค๊ณ์ฌ์์ฐ์ฑ์ ๊ณ ๋ฐฉ์(์ต์ข ).PDF
2003. 12. .,.,,...,,,...,. 2003 12 1. 10 1. 10 2. 11. 15 1. 15 2. 16 3. 20. 43 1. 43 2. 45 3. (comp en sation) 61 4. 72 5. 78. 81 1. 81 2. ALICO 92 3. 98 4. 105. 109 1. 109 2. 112 3. 118 4. 120. 124 127
334 ้ ๆบช ๅญธ ๊ณผ ๅ ๆ ๆ ๅ ็ฌฌ 55 ่ ่ง ่ชช ์์๋ ๋ฟ์ด ๋ ๋ง๊ณผ ๊ณ ์์ด๋ผ๋ ๊ธฐํ์ ๋๋ฌผ์ ์์ฌ๋ก ํ์ฌ ๋น๋ ์ ์น ์ ํฉ์ ๋นํํ์๊ณ , ็ฝ ้ป ้ฃ ์์๋ ์ ๊ณผ ์ ์ ์์งํ๋ ์๊น์ธ ็ฝ ๊ณผ ้ป ์ด ์๋ก ๋ฒ์ด ๋ ๋ฌธ๋ต์ ํตํ์ฌ ์ณ๊ณ ๊ทธ๋ฆ์ ๊ฐ์น๊ด์ด ์ ๋๋ ํ์ค์ธ
ๅ ๅก ๆดช ๅฎ ้ ์ ๋
ผ์ค๋ฅ ์ฐ๋ฌธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ็ฆน ่ ่ฑ *1) ์ฐจ ๋ก. ์๋ก . ์น๊ทผํ ์์ฌ๋ฅผ ํตํ ๊ณต๊ฐ์ ํ๋. ๋ฌธ๋ต์ ์์ ๋ฐฉ์์ ํตํ ๋
ผ๋ฆฌ์ฑ์ ๊ฐํ. ์ฐ์ธ์ ์์ ๋ฐฉ์์ ํตํ ํ์ค ๋นํ. ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ด๋ก ๅ ๅก ๆดช ๅฎ ้ ์ ไป ็ฅ ์์ ่
ๅฎ ์ฐ๊ฐ์ ํ๋ํ ๋ฌธ์ธ ๊ด๋ฃ์ด๋ค. ํ์ฐ์์ ๋ฌธ์ง์ธ ๅ ๅก ้ ์ ์์ ์์๋ฌธ์ด ๋๋ถ๋ถ์ ๋น์ค์ ์ฐจ์งํ๊ณ , ่จ ่ชช ๅบ ๋ฑ์ ์ฐ๋ฌธ
ๆญฏ์ฐ๋ณด00-10.PDF
4. ( ) 1.. (M arketin g Chann el Distribu tion Ch annel) (Sets of interdep end ent organization s involved in the process of m aking a product or service available for use or consu m ption) 1). 2). 3).,.
ๆญฏ์ฐ๋ณด01-04.PDF
36. 1. IN G 8 ) ING,.... ING.,,,,. (Executive Board) (Risk Policy Com mittee), (Central Credit Comm ittee), (Central Limit s Com mittee).,,.,. 8) 1999 ING Annual Report pp. 32 36 pp. 94 95. 37 1) ING,
h99-37.PDF
1 ).,....,.,. 99,,,.,. I. ( ). 1) 99 / 1999 ( 8 4 ), (, 1999a ). 2) < 1>. 70 90 90. (66 79 ) 66 73 2,000 (66 72 ) 600 (7 1 ) 77 79 1,000. 80 82 1,263 770, 88 900. < 1> ( 1966-1998) : ; (1976-1997), (1998
ๆญฏ์ฐ๋ณด99-6.PDF
. 1. 45),,,. (N ICB), (CAIF),, (IRC : Insurance Research Cou ncil), III(In surance Inform ation Institu te), CAIF, Connin g & Com p any. Conning - 1996 Conning frau d Survey 46) - (IRC). Conning s Survey
ๆญฏ4์ฐจํ์ ๋ํ์๊ณ (์ฅ์ง์ฐ).PDF
* 1)., Heckman Selection. 50.,. 1990 40, -. I.,., (the young old) (active aging). 1/3. 55 60 70.,. 2001 55 64 55%, 60%,,. 65 75%. 55 64 25%, 32% , 65 55%, 53% (, 2001)... 1998, 8% 41.5% ( 1998). 2002 7.8%
ํน์ง....,.,., (good jobs) (rent-sharing) (fairness)..... โ ก. ์๊ธ๊ณผ์์ฐ์ฑ๊ตฌ์กฐ์๋ถ์๋ชจํ ) 1),,,, 2_ ๋ ธ๋๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ
์ฐ๊ณต์๊ธ์๋ค์์๊ฐํ๋ค ์ฐ๊ณต์๊ธ์๋ค์์๊ฐํ๋ค 1) ํฉ์๊ฒฝ * โ
. ๋จธ๋ฆฌ๋ง ().......... * (skhwang@kli.re.kr). ํน์ง _1 ํน์ง....,.,., (good jobs) (rent-sharing) (fairness)..... โ
ก. ์๊ธ๊ณผ์์ฐ์ฑ๊ตฌ์กฐ์๋ถ์๋ชจํ. 1980 1) 1),,,, 2_ ๋
ธ๋๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ ์ฐ๊ณต์๊ธ์๋ค์์๊ฐํ๋ค 1990 -. Hellerstein
์ ๋ด์.PDF
A pplic ation of Continu ou s P re fle x Com po s it e Girder to Rig id F ram e by V ertic al Lo adin g 2001 2 A pplic ation of Continu ou s P re fle x Com po s it e Girder to Rig id F ram e by V ertic
44-4๋์ง.07์ด์ํฌ532~
A Spatial Location Analysis of the First Shops of Foodservice Franchise in Seoul Metropolitan City Younghee Lee* 1 1 (R) 0 16 1 15 64 1 Abstract The foodservice franchise is preferred by the founders who
( )๋ฐ์ฉ์ฃผ97.PDF
DDA D D A 1 ) 1. D DA 1 ). D D A DDA (Doh a Developm en t Agen d a ) 194 7 GATT (Gen er a l Agr eem en t On T a r r ifs a n d T r a d e ; ) 9, 199 5 WT O. 1994 ( 1986-94 ) WT O,. D DA. WT O 2 ). GAT T
SB-600 ( ) Kr SB-600 1
SB-600 () Kr SB-600 1 " " "! $ ' " " $ % & 2 ' ( # # # # " & " # # "! 3 " " # ' # $ # " " " " " 4 " " " " ( # " " " " 5 # $ " " # " " " ( # " 6 " # $ " " # " " " ( # ' " " 7 8 9 k k k k k k k k k 10 k
01-07-0.hwp
์ ๊ฑฐ์ ์์ฅ๊ฒฝ์ โ
ก - 2000 ๊ตญํ์์ ์ ๊ฑฐ์์ฅ์ ์ค์ฌ์ผ๋ก - ๋ฐ๊ฐ์ฌ ์ฐจ ๋ก ํ ์ฐจ๋ก ๊ทธ๋ฆผ ์ฐจ๋ก ์ 1๋ถ ์์ฅ ๋ฉ์ปค๋์ฆ๊ณผ ์ ๊ฑฐ์์ฅ โ
. ์ ๋ก โ
ก. ์ ๊ฑฐ์์ฅ์ ์๋ฆฌ์ ์ด์๋ฐฉ์ ์ ๋น์์ฅ ์ง์ญ๊ตฌ์์ฅ ๋ฌธ์์ฌํญ์ Q&A๋ฅผ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ์ธ์ ์ ๋น์์ฅ ํ๋๋ผ๋น ์ฌ๊ธฐ ์ข
๋ชฉ์ฃผ๊ฐ๊ทธ๋ํ c 2000 ์ค์์ผ๋ณด Cyber์ค์ All rights reserved. Terms
ๆญฏ์ฐ๋ณด01-08.PDF
38. 1.. 1962. ( ) ( ). 1968, 1969. 1969,,,. 1960, 1960. 1969, 1969. 1980. 1989 10%, 20% 1995.,. 39. 1989 40% 1990 30% 1998 40%. 1990 0.2% 50, 1998, 1%. 1993 20%. 100%. 1997, 1997, 40%.,, 1970. 1960 30%
ๆญฏ์ฐ๋ณด01-10.PDF
2001. 12 ,.,..,..,.,..,. ..,.,,...,. 200112 . :,.,.,,... 1) 65 ( 19854.7%199917.0%). 199965 3. 1) 19602.9%20007.1%203019.3%. ii (1990 25.8%200044.9%). ( 19700.4 19992.5), (15199011.9% 199925.9%).,. 46%O
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 21 22 22 23 24 24 27 28 30 30 31 32 33 34 38 39 40 40 42 10 44 46 48 48 50 51 51 53 57 58 58 60 65 67 67 68 71 11 73 74 74 75 77 80 80 83 84 86 89 90 90 91 94 94 94 98 98 101 103 103 12 104
ๆญฏ๊น๋ฏธ์ฑ์๊ณ .PDF
- 1998-2000 - ( ). 1997..,.. (, 20001).,.,, 1990.,,. 1990. (, 2001).. 1998 2000, 1998 2000..,? ?,?,? Juhn Murphy (1993). Juhn Murphy 1970 1990 30 1990., ( ). 1),,. Juhn Murphy 30 3. 3..,...,. -. /.,. 1998-2000
<C3D6C1BE2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F62833322D32C8A3292E687770>
์ ์์ฐจ ์ ์ ํ์ ๋ํ ์๋น์ ์ง๋ถ์์ฌ์ก ์ถ์ ๊ฐํ์ ์ต์งํ ์ด๊ธฐ์
์ ์์ฐจ ์ ์ ํ์ ๋ํ ์๋น์ ์ง๋ถ์์ฌ์ก ์ถ์ An Analysis on Estimation of Willingness to Pay for the New Products of Citrus Tea Assessed by Korean Consumers ๊ฐํ์ * ์ต์งํ** ์ด๊ธฐ์
*** 1) Kang,
02์ ํํ
Yonsei Business Review Vol. 47, No. 1 (Fall 2010), 151-179 David vs. Goliath: M&A of HaiTai Confectionery and Foods Co. by Crown Confectionery Co. Hyun-Han Shin** 2004 10 Korea Confectionary Holdings NV
์ต์ข ๋ณด๊ณ ์.PDF
. 1.... Westbrook and Newman(1978),,, 8). Anderson (1973) 9)., Anderson. () (ou tcom e) () (p rocess)() 10). 8) Westbook, R. A. and Newman J. W., An Analysis of shopper Dissatisfaction for major Household
<5349BBEABEF7C0C75FBDC3C0E5B1B8C1B65FB9D75FB0E6C0EFBBF3C8B2C6F2B0A128C1B6C1A4BFF820C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BE5F323031345F395F3131292E687770>
- i - I. SI์ฐ์
์ ๊ฐ๋
๊ณผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ํน์ฑ (SI์ฐ์
์ ๊ฐ๋
) SI(System Integration) ์ฐ์
์ ์ ๋ถ ๊ธฐ์
๋ฑ์ด ์ํํ๋ ๊ตฌ๋งค ์์ฐ ํ๋งค ๊ณ ๊ฐ๊ด๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์ฌ๋ฌด ๋ฑ์ ๊ดํ ์
๋ฌด๋ฅผ ์ ์์ ์ผ๋ก ์ฒ๋ฆฌํ ์ ์๋๋ก ํ๋์จ์ด(H/W), ํจํค์ง ์ํํธ์จ ์ด(S/W), ์ฝํ
์ธ , ๋ฐ์ดํฐ๋ฒ ์ด์ค, ์์คํ
์ค๊ณ, ๊ต์ก, ์ปจ์คํ
๋ฑ์ ์ ๊ธฐ์ ์ผ๋ก ๊ฒฐํฉํ์ฌ ์ ๋ณด์์คํ
์
No Title
2003 6 A Stu dy on Determ in ation of Con solidation Settlem en t in Soft Grou n d w ith th e Titled Load 2003 6 2003 6 Ab stract A Stu dy on Determ in ation of Con solidation Settlem en t in Soft Grou
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 1~26 ์ค๋ฌผ์ต์ ์์ด์ฉํํด์ํ๋ ฅ์ค์ฆ๋จ์ง ์ฌ์ ์๊ฒฝ์ ์ฑํ๊ฐ 1
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 1~26 ์ค๋ฌผ์ต์
์์ด์ฉํํด์ํ๋ ฅ์ค์ฆ๋จ์ง ์ฌ์
์๊ฒฝ์ ์ฑํ๊ฐ 1 2 3 4 5 6 ln ln 7 8 9 [ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1] ํด์ํ๋ ฅ๋จ์ง๊ฑด์ค๋ก๋๋งต 10 11 12 13 < ํ 1> ํ๊ท๋ถ์๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 14 < ํ 2> ๋ฏธ๋ํ๊ธํ๋ฆ์ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ
, ( ) * 1) *** *** (KCGS) 2003, 2004 (CGI),. (+),.,,,.,. (endogeneity) (reverse causality),.,,,. I ( ) *. ** ***
, 40 3 4 (2006 12 ) * 1) *** *** (KCGS) 2003, 2004 (CGI),. (+),.,,,.,. (endogeneity) (reverse causality),.,,,. I. 1998. 2005 12 ( ) *. ** *** 2, 40 3 4 37.2%, 20 60%. 80%..,..,.,,, (SCB),,,.,..,, /,..
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 85~114 ์ฐ์ ๋ณ์๋์ง์๊ฐ๋์ฒด๊ด๊ณ์ถ์ ์ํตํํ์์ธ์ CO 2 ๊ฐ์ถํจ๊ณผ๋ถ์ * 85
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 85~114 ์ฐ์
๋ณ์๋์ง์๊ฐ๋์ฒด๊ด๊ณ์ถ์ ์ํตํํ์์ธ์ CO 2 ๊ฐ์ถํจ๊ณผ๋ถ์ * 85 86 ~ ~ 87 ~ 88 89 ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln 90 ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln
1ํ๋ -๋ฐฉํํ์ฉ.hwp
์ฃผ์ : ์ด ๊ธ์ ์ธ๊ตญ์ด๊ณ ๋ฑํ๊ต์ ์ฌํ ์ค์ธ 1ํ๋
ํ์์ ๋์ ๋
์๋ก ์ค์ ํ์ฌ ์์ฑ๋์์ผ๋ฏ๋ก, ์ด์ ํด๋นํ์ง ์๋ ํ์์ ์ฝ์ง ๋ง์ธ์. ์๋ง ์ง๊ธ ์ด ๊ธ์ ๋ณด๊ณ ์๋ ํ์๋ค ๋๋ถ๋ถ์ ๊ธฐ๋ง๊ณ ์ฌ๋ฅผ ๋๋ด๊ณ , ์ด์ ๋ฐฉํ์ผ ๋ก ๋ค์ด๊ฐ๋ ์์ ์ผ ๊ฒ์ด๊ณ , ํ์๋ ์ธ๊ตญ์ด๊ณ ๋ฑํ๊ต์ 2๋
๋จผ์ ์
ํํ์ฌ 1ํ๋
๊ณผ 2ํ๋
์ํ์ ๋ง์น๊ณ 3ํ๋
์ผ๋ก์ ์ํํ๋ ์ ๋ฐฐ๋ก์, ํ๋ฐฐ๋ค์
201501_๊ฒฝ์ ์ ๋ง๋ณด๊ณ ์_f.hwp
ISSN 2288-7083 2015. 1 2015. 1 ์ ์ฝ ๊ธ๋
์ค ๊ฒฝ์ ์ฑ์ฅ๋ฅ ์ 3% ์ค๋ฐ ์์ค์ ๋ํ๋ผ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ์ ๋ง ใ
๋ฏธ๊ตญ ๋ฑ์ ์ค์ฌ์ผ๋ก ํ ๊ธ๋ก๋ฒ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ ๊ฐ์ , ๊ตญ์ ์ ๊ฐ ํ๋ฝ ๋ฑ ์ ํ์
์ด ์ฑ์ฅ๋ฅ ์ด ์ ์ฐจ ๋์์ง ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ์์ ์ฑ์ฅ์ ๋ํ ์ง์ถ๋ถ๋ฌธ๋ณ ๊ธฐ์ฌ๋๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋ฉด ๋ด์ ๊ธฐ์ฌ๋๊ฐ ์์ถ ๊ธฐ์ฌ ๋๋ฅผ ์ํํ ์ ๋ง ์ทจ์
์์๋ ๊ธ๋
์ค 42๋ง๋ช
๋์ด๋ 10์ ์ ๋ง(45๋ง๋ช
)์
๋ถ์๊ฒฐ๊ณผ Special Edition ๋ น์๊ฑด๋ฌผ์ ๊ฐ์น์ฐ์ ๋ฐ ํ์๋ฐฐ์ถ ํ๊ฐ ์ด์ ์ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋ถ์ผ์ ์ ๊ทน์ ์ธ ์ฐธ์ฌ ๋ฐฉ์์ ๋ง๋ จ์ด ํ์ํ๋ค. ๋ํ ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ๋ ๋ น์๊ฑด์ถ์ ๊ฒฝ์ ์ฑ์ ๋ํ ๊ฒ์ฆ์ ๋ ํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ ๋ฏธํกํ ์ค์ ์ด๋ค. ๋ฐ๋ฉด, ๋ฏธ๊ตญ, ์๊ตญ, ํธ์ฃผ ๋ฑ์ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋๋ก ๋ น์๊ฑด์ถ๋ฌผ
๊ธฐํํน์งโ
ก 1 ์ง์๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ ํ๊ฐ๊ธฐ๋ฐ ์๋์งํจ์จ๋ฑ๊ธ์ธ์ฆ ๊ฑด์ถ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ์น์ฐ์ ์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ์ง์๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ ํ๊ฐ๊ธฐ๋ฐ ์๋์งํจ์จ๋ฑ๊ธ์ธ์ฆ ๊ฑด์ถ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ์น์ฐ์ ์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ * ์ ์ ์ค ๋ถ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์ ํ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ ์ ๋
น์๊ฑด์ถ์ผํฐ ๋
น์๊ฑด์ถ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋จ ์ ์ฑ ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ํ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ ์ ๋
น์๊ฑด์ถ์ผํฐ ๋
น์๊ฑด์ถ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋จ ๋ฐ ์ ๋ฆ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ํ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ ์ ๋
น์๊ฑด์ถ์ผํฐ ๋
น์๊ฑด์ถ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋จ ์ค ์ข
๋ ๋ถ์ฅ ํ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ ์ ๋
น์๊ฑด์ถ์ผํฐ
ๆญฏFFF01379.PDF
1 9 9 5 M. Div. . 1995 M. Div. . 1 9 9 5 . 1 A. 1 B. 2. 4 A. 4 B. 6 C. 9. 15 A. 15 1. 15 2. 17 3. 2 0 B. 22 1. 22 a. 25 b. 26 c. 27 2. 29 a. 3 0 b. 35 c. 37 3. ( ) 4 1 a. 43 b. 4 5 c. 48. 5 2 A. 5 2 1.
๊ณตํด์ผ ์ ๋ ฅ ์์์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ์ ๋ณ ๋ถ์
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 15, Number 1, March 2016 : pp. 99 ~ 137 ๊ณตํด์ผ์ ๋ ฅ์์์๊ดํ์ฐ์
๋ณ๋ถ์ 1) 99 100 ~ 101 102 103 max m ax 104 [ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1] ์ ์กฐ์
๋ฐ์๋น์ค์
๋ํ์
์ข
์ ๋ ฅ์ฌ์ฉ๋์ถ์ด 105 106 [ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2] 2014 ๋
์ผ๋ณ์ ์๋ฐ์ ์๊ธฐ๊ธฐ์
์ข
AMR
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ์ 14๊ถ ์ 1ํธ
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 14, Number 1, March 2015 : pp. 111~141 2 ์ฐจ์๋์ง์ฐ์
์๊ธฐ์ ์ ํจ์จ์ฑ๊ตญ์ ๋น๊ต๋ฐ ๊ฒฐ์ ์์ธ๋ถ์์๊ดํ์ฐ๊ตฌ 1) 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 max ln ln ln ln 118 ln ln ln ln ln ln ln 119 120 121
์ค์ ๋ฐ ์ ๋ง 09๋ ํ๋ฐ PECVD ๊ณ ๊ฐ ๋ค๋ณํ์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ์ค์ ๊ฐ์ 10๋ ํ์๊ด R&D ์ฅ๋น ๋งค์ถ์ ๋ฐ์ผ๋ก ๋ณธ๊ฒฉ์ ์ธ ์์ ์์ฐ ์์ 1. 09๋ 3Q ์ค์ ๋์ฌ๋ 09๋ 3Q์ ๋งค์ถ๊ณผ ์์ ์ด์ต์ผ๋ก ๊ฐ๊ฐ 142 ์ต์(YoY 16.7%, QoQ 142%), 6 ์ต์(ํ์ ํ)
KRP Report (3ํ์ฐจ) GOLDEN BRIDGE Research - ์ค๋ชฐ์ผ - Not Rated ํ
์ค (095610) ๊ณต์ ๋ฏธ์ธํ ์ถ์ธ์ ์ํ, ํ์๊ด ์ฅ๋น์ ๋งค์ถ ๊ฐ์ํ๋ก ๊ฒฌ์กฐํ ์ฑ์ฅ ์์ฑ์ผ: 2009.11.18 ๋ฐ๊ฐ์ผ: 2009.11.19 3Q ์ค์ ๋์ฌ์ 3๋ถ์ ๋งค์ถ๊ณผ ์์
์ด์ต์ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 141.5 ์ต์(QoQ 142%), 6 ์ต์(ํ์ )์ด๋ค. ๋ชฉํ๊ฐ
DBPIA-NURIMEDIA
The e-business Studies Volume 17, Number 4, August, 30, 2016:319~332 Received: 2016/07/28, Accepted: 2016/08/28 Revised: 2016/08/27, Published: 2016/08/30 [ABSTRACT] This paper examined what determina
ๆญฏ์ฐ๋ณด00-6.PDF
. 1. 2).,,,..,,. < - 1> - - - - - - - - - 2) (economies of scope) n n. - 24 - . (Savage ; 1991, Berger and Humphery ; 1992,, 1997b) () (Boyd and Graham ; 1986, 1988, 1993, ; 1997).,, 3). translog,. 2.
ๆญฏ320.PDF
Thermo Orion Model 320 PerpHecT Meter I. 1 II. A. 2 B. Keypad 3 III. A. 4 B. 4 IV. A. 5 B. 5 C. setup 6 V. ph A. 7 B. ph 8 VI. LogR ph A. 10 B. LogR? 11 C. LogR 12 VII. mv/ ORP/ A. mv 13 B. (, ) 13 VIII.
Microsoft Word - 040203 .........doc
24. 2. 4/ ๊ธฐ์
๋ถ์ ์ ํ์ง์ฃผ Analyst ๊ตฌ๊ฒฝํ 2) 3772-7476 bird9@koreastock.co.kr ์ ํ์ง์ฃผ (5555) ๊ธฐ์
๊ฐ์น์ Upgrade ๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ์ ๋ณด์ Buy(maintain) ๋งค์(์ ์ง) ์กฐํฅ์ํ์ ๊ฐ์ ์์ผ ๊ธฐ์
๊ฐ์น๋ฅผ Upgrade : ๋ชฉํ ์ฃผ๊ฐ 24,์ ์ํ์ฃผ ์ค์์ ์ ์ผํ๊ฒ ๋งค์(Buy) ์๊ฒฌ์ ์ ์ํ๋ ์ด์ ๋ ํฅํ ๊ธฐ์
๊ฐ์น๊ฐ
<C6EDC1FD2DBAB8B0EDBCAD3132333128BCF6C1A4292D303130352DBABBB9AE2E687770>
์ฐ๊ตฌ 09-24 ๋ฌผ ์๋ ์ํํ๊ฒฝ ์ธ์ฆ์ ๋ ๋น์ฉํจ๊ณผ ๋ถ์์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ 2009. 12 ํ๊ตญ์ธ๊ฐ๋ฐ์ ์ 1์ฅ ์ ๋ก 1.1 ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ํ์์ฑ 1 1.2 ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ชฉ์ 3 1.3 ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ 3 ์ 2์ฅ ๋ฌผ ์๋ ํ๊ฒฝ์ ๋ํ ์ฃผ์ ๊ฐ๋
2.1 ๋ฌด ๋์์ธ์ ๊ฐ๋
5 2.2 ๋ฌผ ์๋ ์ํํ๊ฒฝ ์ธ์ฆ์ 6 2.2.1 ์ธ์ฆ์ข
๋ฅ 7 2.2.2 ์ธ์ฆ๋์ 7 2.2.3 ์ธ์ฆ๊ธฐ๊ด 7
CONTENTS SUMMARY PART 1 MARKET MARKET STRATEGY MARKET ISSUE MARKET ISSUE PART 2 CREDIT CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT STRA
CONTENTS SUMMARY PART 1 MARKET MARKET STRATEGY MARKET ISSUE MARKET ISSUE PART 2 CREDIT CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT STRATEGY 4 CREDIT ISSUE 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99
๊ตญ๋ด์ ์ฌ๋ณดํ๊ฐ๋ ๋ฐ์ฌ์ ํํฉ.PDF
2002. 7 ,..,. 2001, 15 7, 50 24% 29%. 5 0.2%, 17.5%... 32,.. ,,. ( ). 2002 7 . 1 1. 1 2. 3 3. 7 4. 19. 26 1. 26 2. 39 3. 52 4. 63 5. 74. 89 1. 89 2. 97 3. 104 4. 109 5. 118 6. 123 7. 127 8. 135 9. 139
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ 16 ๊ถ์ 1 ํธ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 35~55 ํ์ ์ ๋ ฅ์์ฅ๊ฐ๊ฒฉ์๋ํ์ญ์ฌ์ ์์ธ๋ถํด * 35
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ 16 ๊ถ์ 1 ํธ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 35~55 ํ์ ์ ๋ ฅ์์ฅ๊ฐ๊ฒฉ์๋ํ์ญ์ฌ์ ์์ธ๋ถํด * 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 < ํ 1> ํ๋ณธ์๋ฃ์๊ธฐ์ดํต๊ณ๋ 42 [ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1] ํ๋ณธ์๊ณ์ด์๋ฃ์์ถ์ด 43 < ํ 2> ์์ค๋ฐ๋ก๊ทธ์ฐจ๋ถ๋ณ์์๋ํ๋จ์๊ทผ๊ฒ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ
Manufacturing6
ฯ6 Six Sigma, it makes Better & Competitive - - 200138 : KOREA SiGMA MANAGEMENT C G Page 2 Function Method Measurement ( / Input Input : Man / Machine Man Machine Machine Man / Measurement Man Measurement
ๆญฏ๋ ผ๋ฌธ์๊ท๋ง.PDF
3 3.1 (Lim it Equilibrium M eth od ),,, Coulom b,..,... = 0, F elleniu s, Bishop, Janbu, Spencer, M org en stern and Price, (GLE ),,,. 4.(Dun can & W right, 1980) 1) F., F = S (3.1), S = (Sh ear Stren
์๋ฃ I. ํ์ฌ์ ๊ฐ์ 1. ํ์ฌ์ ๊ฐ์ ๊ฐ. ํ์ฌ์ ๋ช ์นญ : ์ฃผ์ํ์ฌ ์ ๋ถ์ํ ๋. ์ค๋ฆฝ์ผ์ : 1969. 12. 10 ์์ ๊ฐ์ ๋ค. ๋ณธ์ฌ์ ์ฃผ์,์ ํ๋ฒํธ ์ ํ๋ฒํธ, ํํ์ด์ง ์ฃผ์ ์ฃผ ์ : ์ ์ฃผ์ ๋์ง๊ตฌ ๊ธ์๋ 669 2 ์ ํ๋ฒํธ : 0632507114 ํํ์ด์ง :
๋ถ ๊ธฐ ๋ณด ๊ณ ์ (์ 50 ๊ธฐ 1๋ถ๊ธฐ) ์ฌ์
์ฐ๋ 2010๋
01์ 01์ผ 2010๋
03์ 31์ผ ๋ถํฐ ๊น์ง ๊ธ์ต์์ํ ํ๊ตญ๊ฑฐ๋์ ๊ท์ค 2010๋
5์ 14์ผ ํ ์ฌ ๋ช
: ์ฃผ์ํ์ฌ ์ ๋ถ์ํ ๋ ํ ์ด ์ฌ : ๊น ํ (์ธ) ๋ณธ ์ ์ ์ฌ ์ง : ์ ์ฃผ์ ๋์ง๊ตฌ ๊ธ์๋ 669 2 (์ ํ) 063 250 7114 (ํํ์ด์ง) http://www.jbbank.co.kr
ํน๊ฑดํ๋๊ณต์ฒญํ์๋ฃ[1].PDF
: 2002. 8. 21. 15:0017:00 : Korean Re : ( ) I. 1 II. 2 1. 2 2. 4 3. 5 III. 9 1. 9 2. 10 3. 12 4. 16 17 I. (1973.2.6 2482, )(1971 163), (197253) o 3 o, o (m oral hazard) * 1999.06.30 : 23, 7-1 - 1999.10.30
2002.9์์์ .doc
2002 [ ] 1...... 1 2.. 2 3.. 3 4. /.. 4 5...... 5 6.. 6 7.. 7 8.. 8 9.... 9 10..... 10 11. 10 12. 11 .,, CI,. Moody s, S&P, Fitch, The Banker 3., 247,620 2138,405, 179,653 1684,656, 197,006 1267,306. 22,657,
untitled
Mathematics 4 Statistics / 6. 89 Chapter 6 ( ), ( /) (Euclid geometry ( ), (( + )* /).? Archimedes,... (standard normal distriution, Gaussian distriution) X (..) (a, ). = ep{ } ฯ ฯ a 6. f ( F ( = F( f
, ( ) 1) *.. I. (batch). (production planning). (downstream stage) (stockout).... (endangered). (utilization). *
, 40 12 (2006 6) 1) *.. I. (batch). (production planning). (downstream stage) (stockout).... (endangered). (utilization). * 40, 40 12 (EPQ; economic production quantity). (setup cost) (setup time) Bradley
๊ธฐํ์๋ฃ.PDF
< > 1 1 2 1 21 1 22 2 221 2 222 3 223 4 3 5 31 5 311 (netting)5 312 (matching) 5 313 (leading) (lagging)6 314 6 32 6 321 7 322 8 323 13 324 19 325 20 326 20 327 20 33 21 331 (ALM)21 332 VaR(Value at Risk)
๊ตญ์ ๋ฌด์ญ๋ก -02์ฅ
1 1 ( 27 ). 2, 3, 4. - 5. 6,. 7. 2... 17 20... 32 1.? ( ).?? 2.?,? 17 18, (Adam Smith). 40 (David Ricardo).,.,,. 20 (Gottfried Haberler). 2 2. 2 2.,. 6., 7. 1776. 1776,,,., 17 18 (,, ).,. 33 (1571 1641).
ๅ ้ ๋ฐ ๅ
ฑ ็ฃ ๅ ๆฅ ่งธ ไบค ๆต ๋ฅผ ้ ํ ๆฟ ๆฒป ๅฟ ็ ์ ๅฑ ้ ๆน ๅ ๅ ๅ ็ตฑ - ็ถ ์ด ๅ ฑ ๅ ๆธ ๋ ๅ ๅ ็ตฑ ไธ ้ข 73 ๅนด ๅบฆ ไธ ๅ ้ก ๅญธ ่ก f ๅฝน ์ ้ ํ ็ข. ็ต ๅ ฑ ๅ ๆธ ๋ก ็ ๅบ ํฉ๋๋ค l 9 7 3 ๋
il์ ๊ธด ็ก ็ฉถ ๆฉ ้ ไบฌ ้ ๏ฅฝ ้ ็คพ ๅฎ ไฟ ็ตฑ - ็ก ็ฉถ ๅง ๅก ๆ ็ก ๆผ ้ค ๅก ่ฒฌ ไปป ่
: ๋ฃ ๅ ๆค ๅง ๅก
ยฐรธยพรท-01V36pลก
2 3 4 5 6 ..2.3 3 (differential) (equation).. () d/d (). e 0.2 (, ), d/d 0.2e 0.2. e 0.2 (). ()., ().,.. (DE: differential equation). (tpe), (order), (linearit). (ODE: ordinar differential equation). (2).
untitled
MIRAEASSET QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH KOREA Quantitative Analysis KORE Feb. 8, 27 Style Matters! Mirae Asset Style Strategy : Monthly Update C ontents PART 1. Highlights & MASS 5 Overview 1. Highlights 2.
<C3CA3520B0FAC7D0B1B3BBE7BFEB202E687770>
1. ๋งํ๊ฒฝ ๋ง๋ค๊ธฐ 59 2. ๋ฌผ ์์์์ ๋ง์ 71 3. ๋น๋ ํํ 84 4. ๊ฝ๋ณด๋ค ์๋ฆ๋ค์ด ๊ฒฐ์ 97 5. ๊ฑฐ๊พธ๋ก ์ฌ๋ผ๊ฐ๋ ๋ฌผ 110 6. ๋ด๊ฐ ๋ง๋ ๊ธฐ์๊ณ 123 7. ์ ๋
๋
ธ์์ ๋ง์ ๋ ์จ? 136 8. ๋ชป์๊ฒจ๋ ๋๋ ๊ฝ! 150 9. ๋จํ์ ์๊น ์ถ๋ฆฌ 162 10. ๊ณ ๋ง์์! ์ง๋ ์ด 174 1. ๋ ์๋ผ ์ด๊ธฐ๊ตฌ 188 2. ๋ ๋๊ตฌ๊ฒ? 198 3.
<3039303432345FB1B9C1B65FC1DFB3B2B9CC5FB1B9B0A1BFA15FB4EBC7D15F494D465FB1DDC0B6C1F6BFF85FC7F6C8B25FB9D75FC0FCB8C128C3D6C1BE295BBCF6C1A45D2E687770>
ํด์ธ๊ฒฝ์ ํฌ์์ ๋ณด 2009. 4. 20 ํด์ธ๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๊ตญ๋ณ์กฐ์ฌ์ค ์ต๊ทผ IMF์ ๋ ์ค๋จ๋ฏธ ๊ธ์ต์ง์ ํํฉ ๋ฐ ํฅํ ์ ๋ง 1. ์ต๊ทผ ํํฉ ๋ฉ์์ฝ, ์ฝ์คํ๋ฆฌ์นด ๋ฑ์ ๋ํ IMF ๊ธ์ต์ง์ ์ฌ๋ก ๋ฐ์ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ๋ฐ ๊ธ์ต์๊ธฐ๋ก ์ธํด ์ค๋จ๋ฏธ ๊ตญ๊ฐ๋ค์ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ์นจ์ฒด๊ฐ ์ง์๋๊ณ ๋๋ฏธ ์ ์ถ, FDI, ๋์ธ์์กฐ ๋ฑ์ด ๊ธ๊ฒฉํ ์์ถ๋๋ฉด์, ๋์ธ ์ ๋์ฑ ํ๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ํด ์์ด๋ฐ๋๋ฅด, ๋ฉ์์ฝ, ๊ณผํ
๋ง๋ผ,
( ),,. 1).. 2). 3). 4). KEYWORD :, Data Envelopement Analysis, , %(10 ), 19.6%, 34.8% ,.. (economies of scale) (economies
( ),, 1) 2) 3) 4) KEYWORD :, Data Envelopement Analysis, 1997 488, 1 5 6 30%(10), 196%, 348% 2 2001, (economies of scale) (economies of scope) 1, Data Envelopment Analysis (production frontier) II, DEA
ยฑยนยนรรยบรร -ยธรฑรรทรรขยทรยฟรยผยบ
Vision ROA : 1.2% : 1.5% 2006 4. / 2001. 11. 1 2001. 11. 9 2002. 4. 8 2002. 5. 11 2002. 9. 22 2002. 10. 1 2002. 10. 29 2002. 11. 21 2002. 12. 4 2003. 3. 13 2003. 5. 26 2003. 8. 7 2003. 9. 1 2003. 9. 3
์ฐพf ;์ ์ฝฉ ๋ณต์์ 1:11 71 ๋ณธ๊ฒจlํ (๊ณ ์ฆ๋ช๊ด๋ จ๋ฌธํ์๋ฃ์ง)
:J NO ๊ทธ๋ค๋ด\ ์ฉ~l ๋ณด์กด๊ธฐ๊ฐ 1 3 5 10 30 ์ค์๊ตฌ ์๊ตฌ ์์ฐ๋ถ์๋ช
๊ถ๋ฅ๋ฌธํ์ฌ๊ณ } ์ฐพf ;์
๊ฟ ๋ณต์์ 1:11 71 ๋ณธ๊ฒจlํ (๊ณ ์ฆ๋น๊ด๋ จ๋ฌธํ์๋ฃ์ง) ๋ฌด ์ ์ ์ ์ ์ ํ ์ฌ ์ ์ ์ ๋นผ ์ ์ ๋นผ ์ ์ ์ ์ ์ ์f ๋งค 4 ์ ๋ฃ ์ค ์ ์ ์ ๋นผ ์ ์ ์ ์ ์ U ์ ์ 9 11 j 0( 2) 807 ๋ฌธํ์ฌ์ฒญ ์ฐพf ;์
์ฝฉ
` Companies need to play various roles as the network of supply chain gradually expands. Companies are required to form a supply chain with outsourcing or partnerships since a company can not
'00 ์ง์ญ๋ณ๋ถ์.PDF
. 1., 53,569 18.4%, (18.3% ), (7.6% ), (7.4% ). 2000 ( :,, % ) ( ) 2,440,992 53,569 748 74,399 3,537 6.6 43 5,875 812,369 14,893 334 20,297 1,316 8.8 55 2,099 690,726 15,562 289 20,591 2,048 13.2 40 3,267
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 1~18 ๊ฐ๊ฒฉ๋น๋์นญ์ฑ๊ฒ์ ๋ชจํ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋๋ถ์ 1
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 1~18 ๊ฐ๊ฒฉ๋น๋์นญ์ฑ๊ฒ์ ๋ชจํ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋๋ถ์ 1 2 3 < ํ 1> ECM ์์ด์ฉํ์ ํ์ฐ๊ตฌ 4 5 6 7 and 8 < ํ 2> ์ค์ฐจ์์ ๋ชจํ (ECM1~ECM4) 9 10 < ํ 3> ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋๋ถ์์์ฐ์ธ๋๋ฏธ๋ณ์ 11 12 < ํ
ๆญฏํ์ง_์ต์ข H_.PDF
21 5 LG < > / 5 5 Chen, Roll, Ross,, (-) (+) (-), (-) (+) / (-), (+) J, /, (-) IMF, /,,, 5bp 5bp 1 1 3 ( )/ ( ) ( :p) 1 3 6 / 1-23 45 55 1% 2 33 42 1p 296 234 175 1%p -13 147 171 1%p 1 81 7 1% 48 57 54
587.eps
VP7-6 Series VP7-6-FPG-D- (FG-S) (FG-D) (YZ-S) (YZ-D) Closed center (FHG-D) Exhaust center (FJG-D) (FPG-D) Pressure center(fig-d) VP7-6-FHG-D- VP7-6-FG-S- VP7-6-FG-D- (V) (A) ) (A) ) (V) ) 0.15~0.9{1.5~9.}
- 1 -
- 1 - External Shocks and the Heterogeneous Autoregressive Model of Realized Volatility Abstract: We examine the information effect of external shocks on the realized volatility based on the HAR-RV (heterogeneous
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 1~29 ์ ์ฑ ์ฉ๋๋ณํน์ฑ์๊ณ ๋ คํ๋์๊ฐ์ค์์ํจ์์ ์ถ์ :, ARDL,,, C4, Q4-1 -
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 1~29 ์ ์ฑ
์ฉ๋๋ณํน์ฑ์๊ณ ๋ คํ๋์๊ฐ์ค์์ํจ์์ ์ถ์ :, ARDL,,, C4, Q4-1 - . - 2 - . 1. - 3 - [ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1] ๋์๊ฐ์ค์์์์ค์ง GDP ์ถ์ด - 4 - - 5 - - 6 - < ํ 1>
<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>
๋ถ๋์ฐํ์ฐ๊ตฌ ์ 16์ง ์ 1ํธ, 2010. 3, pp. 117~130 Journal of the Korea Real Estate Analysts Association Vol.16, No.1, 2010. 3, pp. 117~130 ๋น์ ํ Mankiw-Weil ์ฃผํ์์ ๋ชจํ - ์๋๊ถ ์ง์ญ์ ๋์์ผ๋ก - Non-Linear Mankiw-Weil Model on Housing
" " "! $ ' " " $ % & 2
SB-800 Kr " " "! $ ' " " $ % & 2 ' ( # # # # " & " # # "! 3 " " # ' # $ # " " " " " 4 " " " " ( # " " " " 5 # $ " " # " " " ( # " 6 " # $ " " # " " " ( # ' " " 7 8 9 k k k k k k k k k u 10 k k k k k 11
๋ชฉ ์ฐจ 1. ํ๋์ ๊ฐ์ 2. ์ด์ฉ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์์ต๋ฅ ํํฉ 3. ์์ฐํํฉ 4. ํฌ์์ด์ฉ์ ๋ฌธ์ธ๋ ฅ ํํฉ 5. ๋น์ฉํํฉ 6. ํฌ์์์ฐ๋งค๋งค๋ด์ญ 7. ๊ณต์ง์ฌํญ <์ฐธ๊ณ - ํ๋์ฉ์ด์ ๋ฆฌ>
ํ(์ฃผ์)์ด์ฉ [์ฃผ์ํ ํ๋] [ ์์ฐ์ด์ฉ๋ณด๊ณ ์ ] (์ด์ฉ๊ธฐ๊ฐ: 2015๋
10์ 01์ผ - 2015๋
12์ 31์ผ) o o ์ด ์ํ์ [์ฃผ์ํ ํ๋] ๋ก์, [์ถ๊ฐ ์
๊ธ์ด ๊ฐ๋ฅํ ์ถ๊ฐํ์ด๊ณ , ๋ค์ํ ํ๋งค๋ณด์์ ์ข
๋ฅ๋ฅผ ์ ํํ ์ ์๋ ์ข
๋ฅํ ํ๋์
๋๋ค.] ์์ฐ์ด์ฉ๋ณด๊ณ ์๋ ์๋ณธ์์ฅ๊ณผ ๊ธ์ตํฌ์์
์ ๊ดํ ๋ฒ๋ฅ ์ ์๊ฑฐ ์์ฐ์ด์ฉํ์ฌ๊ฐ ์์ฑํ๋ฉฐ, ํฌ์์๊ฐ ๊ฐ์
ํ ์ํ์
Microsoft Word - 2014Outlook_์ฆ๊ถ์ _editing_final_f.docx
1 Outlook 1 ์ฆ๊ถ ์ฐ์
์ ๋ง Overweight ์ฆ๊ถ/์ํ/์ง์ฃผ 1. 11. 7 Analyst ๋ฐ์ ํธ -9-7 Sunho.park@meritz.co.kr RA ์๊ฒฝ์ -9-97 Kyungwan.eun@meritz.co.kr Top Pick ๋์ฐ์ฆ๊ถ() Buy, TP 1,์ ํฌ์ํฌ์ธํธ I. ์์ต๊ตฌ์กฐ ๊ฐ์ ๋น์์ฑ ์ฆ๋: ์ด์ ๋ ์์กด์ ๋ฌธ์ ์ด๋ค 1. ๋ฌธ์ ์
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ์ 13๊ถ ์ 1ํธ
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 13, Number 1, March 2014 : pp. 23~56 ๊ฑฐ์๊ณ๋๋ชจํ์์ด์ฉํ์ ๋ ฅ์๊ธ ํ๊ธํจ๊ณผ๋ถ์ * 23 24 25 26 < ํ 1> OECD ์ ๋ ฅ์๊ธ์์ค ( ๋จ์ : $/MWh) 27 28 < ํ 2> ๋ชจํ์๊ตฌ์ฑ 29 30 31 [ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1] ์ฐ๋ฆฝ๋ฐฉ์ ์๋ชจํ์๊ฐ์ 32
ๆญฏ4์ฐจํ์ ๋ํ์๊ณ (ํฉ์๊ฒฝ์ด์ํธ).PDF
1) 2).. 1-4.,,,, k?,,,. -, 4.... (norm alization ) (social inclusion ),..,. 1990.. 2000 145 100 3.1% 1, 1* *** 4. ( ). 3) 133 15 64, 56. 47.8% 71.6% 28.4%. 4.1% 7 ( 1). 4) < 1> 1 2 (2000) 47.8 71.6 28.4
AGL1.36/...
3 01 part 3.6% 3.4% 3.2% 2.5% 2.7% 3.1% 2.9% 2.3% 7 born in each country, live in US PEOPLES 8 PEOPLES PEOPLES 9 10 PEOPLES 11 PEOPLES 12 PEOPLES 13 14 15 PEOPLES 16 17 PEOPLES 18 PEOPLES 19 FRB PEOPLES
<2D3828C8AE29B9DAC3B5B1D42E687770>
๋ถ๋์ฐํ์ฐ๊ตฌ ์ 16์ง ์ 1ํธ, 2010. 3, pp. 131~146 Journal of the Korea Real Estate Analysts Association Vol.16, No.4, 2010. 3, pp. 131~146 ์ฃผํ์์ฅ ์ฒด๊ฐ์งํ์ ์ฃผํ์์ฅ์งํ ์์ธก๋ ฅ ๋ถ์ * 1) Analysis on the Predictive Power of the Housing
Microsoft Word - 110831 Stragegy Monthly 9์ํธ.doc
็พ ์ฑ๋ฌดํ๋ ์ํฅ 211๋
9์ํธ ํด๊ฒฐ๋ ๊ฒ์ด๋ผ๋ ๋ฏฟ์ ๋ฆฌ์์น์ผํฐ 211๋
8์ 31์ผ ํํ Strategy Monthly 9์, ์ํ์ ์ ํํ๋ค๋ฉด ๋ฐ๋ก ์ง๊ธ์ด๋ค 9์ KOSPI ์ํ๋จ๋ฐด๋ 1,78pt ~ 2,4pt ํ๋ฐ๊ธฐ ์ ๋ง [์๊ฐ์ ์๋ฌผ์ ๊ฐ ํ๋ฆด ๋๊น์ง]์์ ์ ์ํ ๅ ๅผฑ (3๋ถ๊ธฐ) ๅพ ๅผบ (4๋ถ๊ธฐ) ์๋๋ฆฌ์ค๋ฅผ ์ ์งํ๋ค. ๋ฌผ๋ก ๊ธ๋ฝ์ ๋ํ ๋ฐ๋ฐ์ด ์ถํํ
KDI์ ์ฑ ํฌ๋ผ์ 221ํธ ( ) ( ) ๋ด์ฉ๋ฌธ์ : ์ด์ฌ์ค ( ) ๊ตฌ๋ ๋ฌธ์ : ๋ฐ๊ฐ์๋ฃ๋ด๋น์ ( ) ๋ณธ์ ์ฑ ํฌ๋ผ์๋ด์ฉ์ KDI ํํ์ด์ง๋ฅผ ํตํด์๋๋ณด์ค์์์ต๋๋ค. ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ๊ฒฝ
KDI์ ์ฑ
ํฌ๋ผ์ 221ํธ (2010-01) (2010. 2. 10) ๋ด์ฉ๋ฌธ์ : ์ด์ฌ์ค (02-958-4079) ๊ตฌ๋
๋ฌธ์ : ๋ฐ๊ฐ์๋ฃ๋ด๋น์ (02-958-4312) ๋ณธ์ ์ฑ
ํฌ๋ผ์๋ด์ฉ์ KDI ํํ์ด์ง๋ฅผ ํตํด์๋๋ณด์ค์์์ต๋๋ค. http://www.kdi.re.kr ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋ณ๋์ฑ์๋ํ์์ธ๋ถ์๋ฐ์์ฌ์ ์ด์ฌ์ค (KDI ๋ถ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์ ) * ์ ์ฝ,,, 1970. * (,
ๆญฏ๋ชฉ์ฐจ.PDF
200% 2000 9 , LG < >, IMF,, 30 IMF 30,,, 30 1997 307, 63 1999 244, 149 489% 164% 30 IMF 2000 1999 i ,, (+), (-) IMF 30 5~30 1~4 (-), (+) IMF 30, 200%, 30 ii < > < > I 30 1 1 1 2 2 3 7 4 8 5 9 II 30 11
:. 1. (,1995)..,, (,1994)..,.(,1989).,,,, (,1995).,,,, (,,,,1998)., (W oods,1985).. (1995) 7.8%, 17.3%, 61.5%. (,1995) 20-80%,, 5% (Hamilton, P arry, Alagm a, Blum enthal, and H erz,1984). 1 25 40% (,3196
a16.PDF
,,,, A B S T RA CT A S t u dy on S erv ic e Ch ara ct eri s t ic s of D ire c t ors of H e alt h Cen t ers in K ore a T his stu dy h as attempted to show general characteristics of health centre director
ๅ ็ตฑ ่ชฟ 8 9-1 0-7 3 7.7 ็น ๅฅ ๅฎฃ ่จ ๊ณผ ๅ ่ช ้ ้ ไฟ ่จญ ๅฎ ์ ไฝ ็ธ ่ซธ ๅ ้ก ๋ฐ ๊ทธ ๅฑ ๆ l 9 8 9.,'.y.'"a. U.-.i '.;-,-'.(."'.''.-t..u-. -.-.'๋ฅผ ไปป ่
;.?. ๆฐธ ไฟ ( ๆฑ ๅ ๅคง ) t3..:. ๅฐ.,.'5; 4?:i??l: -7;:..j'.;J ; ::... ๅ ๅ ็ตฑ - ้ข ๅ
๋ถ๋ฌธ๋ณ ์๋์ง์ ์์์ ๋ณ๋ํน์ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ณตํต๋ณ๋์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ๊ฑฐ์์ ์์ธ๋ค์ ์ํฅ๋ ฅ ๋ถ์
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 15, Number 1, March 2016 : pp. 33 ~ 67 ๋ถ๋ฌธ๋ณ์๋์ง์์์์๋ณ๋ํน์ฑ๋ฐ๊ณตํต๋ณ๋์ ๋ฏธ์น๋๊ฑฐ์์ ์์ธ๋ค์์ํฅ๋ ฅ๋ถ์ 33 ~ < ํ 1> ์๋์ง์๋น๋๊ณผ์ฃผ์๋ณ์๋ค์์ฐํ๊ท ์ฆ๊ฐ์จ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 34 35 36 37 38 ~ 39 [ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1] ๋ถ๋ฌธ๋ณ์๋์ง์์๋น๋์์ฆ๊ฐ์จ
02๊นํ์(51-72.hwp
๋ณดํ๊ธ์ต์ฐ๊ตฌ ์ 26๊ถ ์ 1ํธ (2015. 2) pp. 51-71 ์ํด๋ณดํ์ฌ์ ์ถ์ฌ๋ ๊ณผ๋คํ๊ฐ? -RBC ๊ท์ ์ ๊ธฐ์ดํ ๋ถ์ - * Do P/L Insurers Cede Too Much? - An Analysis Based on the RBC Regulation - ๊น ํ ์ ** ๊น ์ ์ *** Hunsoo Kim Seog Young Kim ๊ฒฝ์ ๊ฐ ์ ์ฑ์ฅ์ผ๋ก
ๆญฏ๋ชฉ์ฐจ.PDF
-, - 2001 5 LG i < >,, Probit, (10 T-Bond - 3 T-Bill ) 197311~19753 19801~19807 4 60%, 19817~198211 8 64% 196912~197011 19907~19913 50%, (5-1 ) ii 19922~19931 19968~19986 9 57%, 67% 19881~19897 9 41% 20007~12,
รรตยฑรรยคยบยธAb72ยฐยปรถdic143ลก
2013.6 SECURITIES FINANCE Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Contents Part 5 Part 5 SECURITIES FINANCE PART 1 01 02 03 04 PART 2 PART 3 PART 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PART
untitled
200 180 ( ) () 1,060 1,040 160 140 120 / () 1,020 1,000 980 100 960 80 940 60 920 2005.1 2005.2 2005.3 2005.4 2006.1 2006.2 2006.3 2006.4 2007.1 2007.2 2007.3 150000 () (% ) 5.5 100000 CD () 5.4 50000
<30352D30312D3120BFB5B9AEB0E8BEE0C0C720C0CCC7D82E687770>
IT๋ฒ๋ฅ ์ปจ์คํ
๊ฐ์๊ต์ (์) ์๋ฌธ๊ณ์ฝ์ ์ดํด ์ํํธ์จ์ด ์์ฐ๊ด๋ฆฌ๊ธฐ๋ฒ ์๋ฌธ๊ณ์ฝ์ ์ดํด - 1 - - 2 - - 3 - - 4 - - 5 - - 6 - - 7 - - 8 - - 9 - - 10 - - 11 - - 12 - - 13 - - 14 - - 15 - - 16 - - 17 - - 18 - - 19 - - 20 - - 21 - - 22 - - 23 -
๋ณด๊ด๋ณธ.PDF
T CP (T CP T hr oughput Gu ar ant ee u sing P acket Buffering ), {schoi, ckim }@popeye.snu.ac.kr (Differentiated Services ) T CP (flow ).. T CP.. T CP.. RT T. A bs tract T his paper deals w ith th e T
Microsoft Word - 0900be5c8034c413.docx
213. 11. 21 Fixed Income Outlook CREDIT MARKET RESEARCH 214๋
ํฌ๋ ๋ง ์์ฅ: ๋ณด์ด์ง ์๋ ์ - ์ ๋ถ 214๋
ํฌ๋ ๋ง๋ฌผ์ ๋ฐํ์์ฅ์ ํ๋ฐํ์ง ์์ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ์์. ๊ณต๊ธฐ์
์ ๋ถ์ฑ๊ด๋ฆฌ๋ก ์ ๊ท์ฌ ์
์ ์ฒด, A๋ฑ๊ธ ์ดํ ํ์ฌ์ฑ์ ๋ฎ์ ์ฐจํ๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ์ผ๋ก ์ธํ ์์ํ, ์ํ์ ๋ฐ์ คIII ๋๋น๋ฅผ ์ํ ์ ์๊ธ์กฐ๋ฌ ์๋ฃ ๋ฑ์ผ๋ก ์๋ฐํ์ก์
๋ดํธ.PDF
11 1 (2002 ), pp. 29~5-1),,.......... Yale,.. 1) 2000 (KRF-2000-041-C00160). 2001.. 29 2002 ( 11 1 ).. (, ). (, ). 21.... 10 0.5% (, 2000). 2000 1%.. /.,,.... ( ) ( ).? 30 / -..,,... 1.. 4-5 (, 2000, 1998,
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp.357-378 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.29.2.201906.357 3 * Effects of 9th Grade Students Participation in Career Curriculum Cluster
ยฐรธยฑรขยพรยฑรขยฑรข
20, 30, 40 20, 30, 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3.1 6.3 9.4 12.6 15.7 18.8 22.0 25.1 28.3 31.4 2.4 4.7 7.1 9.4 11.8 14.1 16.5 18.8 21.2 23.6 7.1 14.1 21.2 28.3 35.3 42.4 49.5 56.5 63.6 70.7 5.9 11.9 17.8 23.7
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ์ 13๊ถ ์ 1ํธ
์๋์ง๊ฒฝ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 13, Number 1, March 2014 : pp. 83~119 ๊ฑฐ์๊ณ๋๋ชจํ์์ด์ฉํ์ ๊ฐ๋ณ๋๋ฐ ์ ๋ฅ์ธ๋ณํ์ํ๊ธํจ๊ณผ๋ถ์ * 83 84 85 86 [ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 1] ๋ชจํ์ํด๊ฒฐ์ ๊ณผ์ 87 [ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ 2] ๊ฑฐ์๊ณ๋๋ชจํ์ํ๋ฆ๋ (flow chart) 88 89 < ํ 1> ์ ๋ฅ์ธํํฉ (2013
untitled
Logistics Strategic Planning pnjlee@cjcci.or.kr Difference between 3PL and SCM Factors Third-Party Logistics Supply Chain Management Goal Demand Management End User Satisfaction Just-in-case Lower
์์ฑ09E02๋ฐ์์.PDF
: * 1 ) 2 ) 3 ) 4 ) 1 ) 5 ) 6 ). 1.,., (cont ent - ba sed cu rricu la ) (pr ocess- b a sed cu rricu la ),,,,,., -, (Ben -Zu r, Ya gil & Spit zer, 1999 ; H egge, 19 9 5 ; Oer m a n n, 19 94 : Spit ser,
<BACFC7D1B3F3BEF7B5BFC7E22D3133B1C733C8A3504446BFEB2E687770>
๋ถํ์ ์ฃผ์ ๋์
๊ด๋ จ ๋ฒ๋ น ํด์ค 1) ์ด๋ฒ ํธ์ ๋ค์ ํธ์์๋ ๋ถํ์ ์ฃผ์ ๋์
๊ด๋ จ ๋ฒ๋ น์ ์๊ฐํ๋ ค ํ๋ค. ๋ถํ์ ํ๋๋์ฅ์ ๋์
ํ๋์กฐํฉ๊ธฐ์ค๊ท์ฝ์ด์ ๊ณผ ๋์ฅ๋ฒ ์ ์ ๊ท์ ๋์ด ์๋ค. ๋ถํ ์ฌํ์ฃผ์ ๋์
์ ์ฑ
์ ์ฌํ ์ฃผ์๋์ด๋ฌธ์ ํ
์ 2), ๋์
๋ฒ, ์ฐ๋ฆผ๋ฒ ๋ฑ์ ํตํด ์ฟ๋ณผ ์ ์๋ค. ๊ตญ๊ฐ๊ณํ๊ณผ ๋์
๋ถ๋ฌธ์ ๊ด ๊ณ, ๋์ฐ๋ฌผ์ ๊ณต๊ธ์ ๊ดํด์๋ ์ธ๋ฏผ๊ฒฝ์ ๊ณํ๋ฒ, ์ฌํ์ฃผ์์์
๋ฒ,
1 9 2 0 3 1 1912 1923 1922 1913 1913 192 4 0 00 40 0 00 300 3 0 00 191 20 58 1920 1922 29 1923 222 2 2 68 6 9
(1920~1945 ) 1 9 2 0 3 1 1912 1923 1922 1913 1913 192 4 0 00 40 0 00 300 3 0 00 191 20 58 1920 1922 29 1923 222 2 2 68 6 9 1918 4 1930 1933 1 932 70 8 0 1938 1923 3 1 3 1 1923 3 1920 1926 1930 3 70 71