대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 - 유엔안보리결의 2270, 2321 호를중심으로 - 임을출 경남대극동문제연구소교수 국문요약..,.,,,,.. 2016
76 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호 1..,,.,.,.,,,,
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 77 Ⅰ. 서론 2016 1 6 4 2 7, (UN : United Nations) (, ),,,. 2 10. 3 2 (WMD),,, 2270 (Resolution 2270/2016) (United Nations Security Council 2016). 2270, ( 2016, 31-32). 2016 9 9 5, 5 82 11 30 7 41 ( ) 2321 (Resolution 2321/2016) ( 2016). (loophole),,. 2270. 2270
78 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호.,,.,,,,, EU,..,,.. (key).,...,.
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 79. Ⅱ. 유엔안보리제재의이행평가 1. 선행연구검토. 2270 ( 2009: 2012) 2016 2270 (2016 3 ) 2321 (2016 11 ) ( 2016, 2016).... 2016 4 3 1., ( 2016, 57; Gary and Jeffrey and Kimberly 1990).,
80 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호 ( 2007, 4-5). ( 2016, 65).,, (Gary and Jeffrey and Kimberly 1990, 65-71). (Oxenstierna, Susanne and Olsson 2015, 24-27) 90%.. 2. 유엔안보리제재의내용과이행실태 1 (resolution). 1695, 1718, 1874, 2087, 2094. 2016 1 4 2270. 2016 9 9 5, 7 41 ( ) 2321.,.
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 81 ( 2016, 2). 2 18 (North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 2016), 2270 3 16 ( 13722 ). 1),, EU,,, ( 2016, 61-62). 2270,.. 2270 2016 11 69. 2009 2 1874 8 48 ( 2012, 160) 2013 3 2094 24 2270. 7, 4,,, 1),,,,,.
82 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호 ( 2016; 2016). 2016 9,,,. 2).. (OMM).. 3.,.,,,., 2270 33 90. 5 2321 2270 WMD 3. ( 2), 2016 4 10 ;, 6,,, 2016 9 14.
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 83 2016, 16).,.... 2321, WMD,,..,. 9. 2014 2 (COI).,.,. 2321 WMD...,,.
84 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호,.,,,.. 2270 13, 15,,. 2321 39, 42.,., IT. 2270 17,. 3. 중국의이행사항과이행실적종합평가 2270 2016 7 20. 6 (United Nations Security Council 2016).,,,,,. 3) 3) United Nations Security Council, Note verbale dated 20 June 2016 from the Permanent Missiion of China to the United Nations adressed to the Chair of the Committee, 29 June 2016; 5,, 2016 7 22.
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 85 2016 3 3. (Coal) (Iron) (Iron ore) (Gold) (Titanium ore) (Vanadium ore) (Rare earth materials), (Aviation Fuel) ( 2016: 3). 2321,,, ( 2016: 15). < 표 1> 북한의수출입금지품목 구분 품목,.,,.. (loophole), 2321. 4 750 (2015 38%). 4) 4),, 2016 12, p.13. WMD,
86 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호. 2016 12 11 31,. 2017 1 25,,,. 45% ( 2016, 3).., 15... 2014 (15 ) GDP(KDI 322 ) 4.7%. 34.4% GDP. 43.8%, 21.8%.,.,. 2014,.,,.
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 87 (HS code 2 (61, 62) ) 7 6,158 22.8%. ( 2016, 6). 2016,. 2016 7.3% 58 3 2016 8.3%, 6.1% 2013. < 그림 1> 최근 5 년간중국의대북교역추이
88 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호 구분 2012 년 2013 년 2014 년 2015 년 2016 년 < 표 2> 최근 5 년간중국의대북교역추이 2016 4, 5. 9,. 구분 1 월 2 월 3 월 4 월 5 월 6 월 7 월 8 월 9 월 10 월 11 월 12 월 < 표 3> 2016 년월별중국의대북교역실적 2016 /
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 89. 20.5%, / 12.5%. 37.4%, 29.9%. 2,500 2015 130.7%. 2016 41,878,450kg 144.3%, kg 6.4%. 2016. 11.1%. 12.5% 11 83. < 표 4> 최근 5 년간중국의대북무연탄수입실적 2016 12,. 74.3%, 32.9% 9.8%.
90 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호 < 표 5> 2016 년월별대북무연탄수입실적 1 월 2 월 3 월 4 월 5 월 6 월 7 월 8 월 9 월 10 월 11 월 12 월,,,,.. 90%.. ( 2016, 49). < 표 6> 유엔안보리제재효과이행실적종합평가 항목 제재효과 이행실적
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 91 Ⅲ. 유엔안보리제재가북한경제에미친영향.,.,,,. 1. 대내경제정책 : 자립성, 주체성및과학기술의강조.,,,. 2016 7., 7 (, 16/05/06),..,
92 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호, ( 2016, 37).,,..,,.,,,.,,,.,...,,.,..,.
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 93 < 표 7> 제재이후제시된경제부문의핵심목표, 노선과과제들 구분내용..,,. 2016 2017.,,,.. 2016 4, 24 ( 17/04/03)..,.
94 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호.,,. (, 15/01/26)...,,...,.,,..,,
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 95.,. 2. 시장 ( 물가및환율 ).,. 5),..,,. [ 2] 2270 12 2017 3,,.. 1. 5),,.
96 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호 < 그림 2> 제재이후물가및환율추이. 2270,,,. ( 16/11/03).,.,. 2016 5. 2017 3.
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 97.,,,.,,,. 5 7 70, 200. 3. 노동정책 : 노력동원및해외근로자파견,,,,,,., 70, ( 2016).. 6.25. 5,. 1959 3,,.,...
98 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호,.,,. 70 100,,.., ( ), ( ),, ( 16/03/21). 7 2016 2 23 70. ( 16/04/06)., (4.12),. ( 16/04/14). 2016 70 200, 7 5. 200., 2016 3 18 2..
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 99 2270. 12 ( 16/09/21). 3, 7 8, 4000 5000, (UAE) 2000 20 40 11 12 3000. 5 6. 23 ( 2 5700 ), 12. ( 16/02/23). 4. 대외경제정책 : 경제특구외자및관광객유치,. -.. - 100,.,. 2016 4 10 29
100 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호 588.,, ( 16/07/09). 2016 7 9.... 2016 3 9 -,, ( 16/03/12). Ⅳ. 결론 : 평가및전망..,..,,,,
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 101.. 2016 1..,,.. 2010,,..,.,,,,..,..,
102 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호.,.,,,. ( 2007, 22-23)..,,.,.,.
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 103 < 참고문헌 >. 2007. :, : KDI.. 2017.,. 2017 4 10., 2016 4 10.. 2016 4 27.. 2016... 2016.... 2016., News Alert: 2.. 2016.,, 2016.. 2016., - ; 61-62.. 2016.,. ( ). 2016 4 10. ( ).. 2016 9 14., 2321,, 2016 11 30.. 2016.,, ( 36 ); 14.
104 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호. 2016., 2016, : ; 49.. 2016., 2016 12, :. 37., 2009. UN,, 2009 7, :.. 2012. UN,, 21 2. 160.. 2016. UN, ; 3.. 2016. 2000-2015, 16-23 : 1.. 2016. 7, (4 19 ). Kim Byung-Yeon. 2016. The Effects of Economic Sanctions on North Korea: Interim Evaluation, 2016 Roundtable on DPRK Agriculture, U.S. Ambassy: 16-18. Oxenstierna, Susanne and Olsson. 2015. "The Economic Sanctions against : Impact and prospects of Success," FOI(FOI-R-4097-SE), September. 24-27. United Nations Security Council, Resolution 2270 (2016), Adopted by the Security Council at its 7638th meeting, on 2 March 2016. United Nations Security Council, Note verbale dated 20 June 2016 from the Permanent Missiion of China to the United Nations adressed to the Chair of the Committee, 29 June 2016. UNSC. 2009. Report of the Panel Experts established pursuant of resolution 1874. Gary Hufbauer, Jeffrey J. Schott, and Kimbery Ann Elliott. 1990. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered : History and Current Policy, IIE.
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 105.2016., (8 16 ).. 2016...., (9 21 ).. 2016., 70, (3 21 ).. 2016., (4 6 )..2016.,, (4 14 )..2016. 70, (3 30 )., 200, (6 2 ).. 2016., (4 6 )..2016. 5, (7 22 )..2016. 69, (11 29 ).
106 통일연구제 21 권제 1 호 Abstract Evaluation for the Implementation of United Nation s Sanctions and the Impact of Sanctions on the North Korean Economy Eul Chul Lim Professor, Kyungnam University This study examines the impact of sanctions on North Korean economy by looking at the implementation status of the United Nations Security Council s sanctions on North Korean economy comprehensively, and analyzing a situation of the official trade with China who is holding a key to the effectiveness of sanctions. Next, it is followed by analysis on how the sanctions have impacted on North Korean government s economic countermeasures and has brought changes in the market, such as prices, exchange rate, etc. It has been revealed that at least North Korea is suffering hardships in earning foreign money due to the problem in shipping, overseas trade, finance sectors, the restriction on North Korean illegal activities abroad, and tightening regulations on dispatching workers abroad, etc. However, it did not have much effect on the trade with China and the market price which are the most notable indicators for the effectiveness of the UN s sanctions. Sanctions have had a considerable effect on the North Korean authorities in relation to the 7th Party Congress. Enduring isolation and pressure has created the spirit of the new era that stresses self-development, independence,
대북제재의이행평가와북한경제에미친영향 107 and self-sustenance. It has also led to strengthening of the mobilization system, expansion of loyalty funds and labor force exports. Sanctions have also affected the market activities in North Korea, leading to public discontent. While impacts on inflation and the exchange rate were negligible, it worsened public anxiety and raised the desire for risk-free assets. In addition, the increased labor mobilization and various tax burdens resulted in a reduction in time invested in business activities that had a direct effect of disrupting people s livelihoods. Key words: United Nations Security Council Resolutions, International Sanctions, North Korean economy, Trade between North Korea and China, Market Price 투고일 : 2017년 04월 14일심사일 : 2017년 05월 20일게재확정일 : 2017년 05월 24일