DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Similar documents
DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

인문사회과학기술융합학회

03이경미(237~248)ok

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Lumbar spine

03-서연옥.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

hwp


THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Nov.; 26(11),

Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

歯1.PDF

03-2ƯÁý -14š

Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ

03-ÀÌÁ¦Çö

09권오설_ok.hwp

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

서론 34 2

달생산이 초산모 분만시간에 미치는 영향 Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 達 은 23) 의 丹 溪 에 최초로 기 재된 처방으로, 에 복용하면 한 다하여 난산의 예방과 및, 등에 널리 활용되어 왔다. 達 은 이 毒 하고 는 甘 苦 하여 氣, 氣 寬,, 結 의 효능이 있

학술원논문집 ( 자연과학편 ) 제 50 집 2 호 (2011) 콩의식품적의의및생산수급과식용콩의자급향상 李弘䄷 * 李英豪 ** 李錫河 *** * Significance of Soybean as Food and Strategies for Self Suffici

09-감마선(dh)



:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

012임수진

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

,, (, 2010). (, 2007).,,, DMB, ,, (, 2010)., LG., (, 2010) (, ,, ) 3, 10, (, 2009).,,. (, 2010)., (, 2010). 11

<35335FBCDBC7D1C1A42DB8E2B8AEBDBAC5CDC0C720C0FCB1E2C0FB20C6AFBCBA20BAD0BCAE2E687770>

<C3D6C1BE2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D32C8A3292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

,......

09구자용(489~500)

Focus2È£pdf

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

09김정식.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

(5차 편집).hwp

*5£00̽ÅÈ�

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

<352EC7E3C5C2BFB55FB1B3C5EBB5A5C0CCC5CD5FC0DABFACB0FAC7D0B4EBC7D02E687770>

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

< C6AFC1FD28C3E0B1B8292E687770>

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

<31325FB1E8B0E6BCBA2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Dec.; 27(12),

한국 출산력의 저하 요인에 관한 연구

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

1..

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

<353420B1C7B9CCB6F52DC1F5B0ADC7F6BDC7C0BB20C0CCBFEBC7D120BEC6B5BFB1B3C0B0C7C1B7CEB1D7B7A52E687770>

<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>

04±èºÎ¼º

,......

00표지

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE. vol. 29, no. 10, Oct ,,. 0.5 %.., cm mm FR4 (ε r =4.4)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

04김호걸(39~50)ok

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

1. KT 올레스퀘어 미디어파사드 콘텐츠 개발.hwp


<31372DB9DABAB4C8A32E687770>

09È«¼®¿µ 5~152s

PJTROHMPCJPS.hwp

139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ

10(3)-09.fm

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

???? 1

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

<C6EDC1FD2DBAB8B0EDBCAD BCF6C1A4292D DBABBB9AE2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

08김현휘_ok.hwp

*논총기획(1~104)

27 2, 1-16, * **,,,,. KS,,,., PC,.,,.,,. :,,, : 2009/08/12 : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/30 * ** ( :

도큐-표지

< C7CFB9DDB1E22028C6EDC1FD292E687770>

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

ePapyrus PDF Document

04_이근원_21~27.hwp

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

현대패션의 로맨틱 이미지에 관한 연구

<33372DC7D7B3EBC8ADC8ADC0E5C7B02E687770>

Samsung_Everland_magazine_0531.pdf

14.531~539(08-037).fm

<443A5CB1E8BFC144425CBAB8B0EDBCAD5CB4EBC7D0C7F5BDC5B0FAB0E6C0EFB7C228C3D6C1BE295F E2E2E>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Transcription:

Original Article Journal of Apiculture 32(3) : 223~235 (2017) DOI: 10.17519/apiculture.2017.09.32.3.223 Survey of Insect Pollinators Use for Horticultural Crops in Korea, 2016 Hyung Joo Yoon*, Kyeong Yong Lee, Hee Sam Lee, Man Young Lee, Yong Soo Choi, Myeong Lyeol Lee and Gi Hyoung Kim 1 Department of Agricultural Biology, The National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea 1 R&D Extension Division, Extension Service Bureau, RDA, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea (Received 12 September 2017; Revised 20 September 2017; Accepted 20 September 2017) Abstract We have surveyed the current status of insect pollinators use for horticultural crops in 2016. The use rate and farm number of insect pollinators for 26 horticultural crops were 25.8% and 55,208, respectively. The colony number of insect pollinators used in this survey was 479,777, which include 344,690 for honeybees, 119,104 for bumblebees, 12,051 for mason bees, 1,317 for flies, and 2,415 for the combination of bumblebees, honeybees, and mason bees. The use rate of insect pollinators was 59.4% for 11 vegetable crops, such as onion (100%), strawberry (99.9%), oriental melon (93.8%), melon (82.8%), water melon (64.8%), tomato (63.6%), pepper (31.8%), paprika (5.9%), zucchini (1.6%), bitter melon (1.2%), and cucumber (0.2%). The colony number of insect pollinators used for 11 vegetable crops was 449,287, which include honeybees (72.3%), bumblebees (25.1%), flies (0.2%), and the combination (2.4%) of bumblebees and honeybees. The use rate of insect pollinators was 9.0% for 15 fruit tree crops, such as mango (100%), raspberry (24.0%), apple (18.3%), persimmon (14.0%), passion fruit (5.5%), boxthorn (4.5%), blueberry (3.8%), Korean raspberry (3.1%), pear (2.7%), cherry (2.2%), pomegranate (1.0%), plum (0.4%), peach (0.2%), kiwi (0.2%), and jujube (0.02%). The colony number of insect pollinators used for 15 fruit tree crops was 30,290, which include honeybees (66.3%), bumblebees (20.2%), mason bees (8.0%), flies (1.6%), and the combination (3.9%) of bumblebees, honeybees, and mason bees. Together, farms of 97.8% showed positive effect for the use of insect pollinators and most of farms (97.0%) planed for the continuous use of insect pollinators. Key words: Insect pollinator, Bumblebee, Honeybee, Mason bee, Horticultural crops, Vegetable crops, Fruit tree crops *Corresponding author. E-mail: yoonhj1023@korea.kr 223

224, (Kearns et al., 1998; Shimizu et al., 2014). 200,000 (Nabhan and Buchnmann, 1997), 124 70% (Klein et al., 2007). 400 130 (Bees) (James and Pitts-Singer, 2008).,,,, (Morandin and Winston, 2005; Greenleaf and Kremen, 2006; Winfree et al., 2007).,, (Free, 1993; Dag and Kammer, 2001). (Batra, 1995; Goulson et al., 2008; Williams and Osborne, 2009; Rao and Stephen, 2010). Gallai et al.(2009) 100 1,530. 2005 9.5%, 1,900 ~3,100. 500, 390. 2016 (IPBES) 75% 5~8%( 2350~5770 ), ( ),,,,. 50 300% 16%, 9%, 37%, 31% (IPBES, 2016).. 2016,,,,,,..,, 2015 (,,,,,,,, 9,,,,, 6 ), 2016 (,,,,,,,, 9 ), 2016 ( ), ( ) 11 15.

225 2017 1 5 2017 5 30 8, 1, 8 156,., 2016,,., 500 1 ( ). 300 / /660m 2 ( 300 /600kg, 5 /kg), 80 / /660m 2 ( 300 /160kg, 5 /kg). 2017 1 5 5 30., 2016,,,,,,. One-way ANOVA (welch) test, T-test, (Frequencies Analyze) (Multiple response analyze). SPSS PASW 22.0 for windows (IBM, USA). One-way ANOVA (welch) test T-test.,,,.. 156 2016,,,,,,,,,, 11 (Table 1). 10 2011 (Yoon et al., 2013),. 11 45,194.0ha, 12,572ha (Statistics Korea, 2015). 8,152.5ha, 6,299.0ha, 4,975.8ha, 4,436.4ha. 2016 11 26,851.9ha, 2011 (21,138.1ha) 1.3 (Table 1). 11 59.4%, 2011 11%. 100%, 99.9%, 93.8%, 82.8%, 64.8%, 63.6% (Table 1). 11,, 4 (Table 1). 26,851.9ha 20,514.1ha(76.4%), 5,383.2ha(20.0%), 899.6ha(3.4%), 55.0ha(0.2%)

226 Table 1. Cultural area and rate of insect pollinators use for 11 vegetable crops in 2016 Vegetable crops Cultural area (ha) Water melon 12,572 8,152.5 8,151.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 64.8 45.8 Tomato 6,976 4,436.4 1.7 4,434.7 0.0 0.0 63.6 40.4 Strawberry 6,306 6,299.0 5,561.8 291.8 445.4 0.0 99.9 99.9 Oriental melon 5,305 4,975.8 4,970.9 0.0 4.9 0.0 93.8 81.2 Pepper 4,878 1,550.8 635.5 465.9 449.4 0.0 31.8 35.4 Zucchini 3,396 52.8 23.1 29.7 0.0 0.0 1.6 5.3 Cucumber 3,338 7.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 Melon 1,546 1,279.5 1,168.1 111.4 0.0 0.0 82.8 38.4 Paprika 707 41.7 0.0 41.7 0.0 0.0 5.9 15.2 Bitter melon 115 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 Onion (seed) 55 55.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.0 100.0 Total 45,194 Total 26,851.9 (100%) Area of insect pollinators use (ha) 20,514.1 (76.4%) Honeybees 5,383.2 (20.0%) Honeybee & 899.6 (3.4%) 55.0 (0.2%) Area rate of insect pollinators use (%) Flies 2016 2011 59.4 48.4 Table 2. The farm number of insect pollinators use for 11 vegetable crops in 2016 Vegetable crops Farm numbers of insect pollinators use Total Honeybees Honeybee & Water melon 11,076 11,065 11 0 0 Tomato 8,154 5 8,149 0 0 Strawberry 14,851 12,928 693 1,230 0 Oriental melon 6,285 6,276 0 9 0 Pepper 3,274 1,221 1,056 997 0 Zucchini 114 80 34 0 0 Cucumber 25 0 25 0 0 Melon 2,308 2,020 288 0 0 Paprika 40 0 40 0 0 Bitter melon 15 15 0 0 0 Onion (seed) 52 0 0 0 55 Total 46,194 (100%) 33,610 (72.8%) 10,296 (22.3%) 2,236 (4.8%) 55 (0.1%) Flies. 2011 (3,009.0ha) 1.8. 39.7%, 27.1%, 24.2%, 5.7%, 3.1%. (Table 1)., 1 82.4%(4,434.7ha), 8.7%, 5.4%, 2.1%., 2011 40.4%, 2016 63.6% 23.2% (Yoon et al., 2013). 50.0%, 49.5%(445.4ha) 99.5%, 5.0%. 100% (Table 1). Table 2 11 46,194 2011 (41,916 ) 4,278 (Yoon et al., 2013). 33,610 (72.8%), 10,296

227 Table 3. The colony numbers of insect pollinators for 11 vegetable crops in 2016 Vegetable crops Colony numbers of insect pollinators Total Honeybees Honeybee & Water melon 167,815 167,791 24 0 0 Tomato 100,769 77 100,692 0 0 Strawberry 93,634 81,519 5,816 6,299 0 Oriental melon 54,750 54,673 0 77 0 Pepper 15,957 6,802 4,658 4,497 0 Zucchini 526 393 133 0 0 Cucumber 168 0 168 0 0 Melon 14,590 13,332 1,258 0 0 Paprika 225 0 225 0 0 Bitter melon 20 20 0 0 0 Onion (seed) 833 0 0 0 833 Total 449,287 (100%) 324,607 (72.2%) 112,974 (25.1%) 10,873 (2.4%) 833 (0.2%) Flies (22.3%), 2,236 (4.8%) 55 0.1%. (38.5%), (33.0%) (18.7%) 90.2%. 2011 (14,922 ) (9,017 ), (6,173 ). 1 79.1% 8,149, 10.3%(1,056 ), 6.7%(693 ). 55.0%(1,230 ), 44.6%(997 ) 2 99.6%. 100%(55 ) (Table 2). 11 449,287 (Table 3), 2011 (306,856 ) 1.5 (142,431 ) (Yoon et al., 2013). 324,607 4 72.3%. 25.1%(112,974 ), 2.4%(10,873 ), 0.2%(833 ). 2011 (52,684 ) 2.1.,, 7. 51.7%, 25.1%, 16.8% 4.1% 4 97.7%. 20 0.6% (Table 3).,, 7, 89.1%, 5.1%, 4.1%, 1.1%. 2011 10 3. 2.4%, (57.9%) (41.4%) (Table 3). 2011 1.4 16.6.,,.,. 0.2%(833 ) (Table 3). 11 3,300m 2

228 Table 4. Cultural area and rate of insect pollinators use for 15 fruit tree crops in 2016 Fruit tree crops Apple 31,620.0 5773.5 3,295.3 1,680.2 633.0 165.0 0.0 18.3 17.8 Peach 16,704.0 27.1 23.1 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.9 Pear 12,664.0 336.3 331.6 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 2.7 23.0 Persimmon 11,849.0 1,656.5 1,579.5 77.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 14.9 Plum 5,920.0 21.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 2.8 Blueberry 4,290.0 161.1 59.8 25.3 0.0 76.0 0.0 3.8 23.2 Jujube 2,700.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Korean raspberry 2,193.0 69.0 69.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 9.1 Kiwi 1,502.4 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Pomegranate 536.5 5.4 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Raspberry 350.0 84.0 84.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.0 Cherry 336.0 7.5 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 Boxthorn 134.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 Mango 41.9 41.9 4.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 35.5 100.0 Passion fruit 10.9 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 Total 90,851.7 Cultural area (ha) 8,193.4 (100%) Total 5,490.3 (67.0%) Area of insect pollinators use (ha) 1,788.8 (21.8%) 637.7 (7.8%) Honeybees Masonbee Honeybee, & Mason-bee 241.0 (2.9%) 35.5 (0.4%) Area rate of insect pollinators use (%) Flies 2016 2011 9.0 14.1, Fig. 1 3,300m 2 14.2 3.4, 15.3 8.4 (T-test: t(14)=0.548, p=0.592). 2016,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 15 (Table 4). 10 2011 (Yoon et al., 2013),,,,. 15 90,851.7ha, 31,620.0ha, (16,704.0ha), (12,664.0ha) (Statistics Korea, 2015). 5,773.5ha, 1,656.5ha, 336.3ha. 2016 15 8,193.4ha, 2011 (12,130.3ha) 5 32.5%(1.5 ). 2016 15 8,193.4ha 11 (26,851.9ha) 3.3 (Table 1 and Table 4). 15 (100%), (24.0%) (18.3%), (14.0%) 10%. 2016 15 9.0% 2011 (14.1%) 5.1% (Table 4). 2011 (Yoon et al., 2013),, 2.7% 20.3%, 3.8% 19.4%.,,. 15,,, (, ), 5

229 Table 5. The farm number of insect pollinators for 15 fruit tree crops in 2016 Fruit tree crops Total Farmer numbers of insect pollinators Honeybees Masonbee Honeybee, & Mason-bee Apple 5,399 2,995 1,595 2,410 183 0 Peach 41 35 6 0 0 0 Pear 320 315 0 5 0 0 Persimmon 1,976 1,882 94 0 0 0 Plum 56 56 0 0 0 0 Blueberry 349 149 78 0 122 0 Jujube 5 5 0 0 0 0 Korean raspberry 300 300 0 0 0 0 Kiwi 5 5 0 0 0 0 Pomegranate 3 3 0 0 0 0 Raspberry 326 326 0 0 0 0 Cherry 15 15 0 0 0 0 Boxthorn 109 109 0 0 0 0 Mango 104 12 9 0 0 83 Passion fruit 6 6 0 0 0 0 Total 9,014 (100.0%) 6,213 (68.9%) 1,782 (19.8%) 631 (7.0%) 305 (3.4%) 83 (0.9%) Flies 1 (Table 4). 8,193.4ha 5,490.3ha(67.0%), 1,788.8ha(21.8%), 637.7ha (7.8%), (, ) 241.0ha(2.9%), 35.5ha (0.4%). 60.0%, 28.8%, 6.0%. (93.9%),,,. 99.3%., 68.5%, 31.5%.. 15 9,014 11 (46,194 ) 5.1 (Table 2 and 5). 6,213 (68.9%), 1,782 (19.8%), 631 (7.0%), (, ) 305 (3.4%) 83 0.9%., (2,995 ) (1,882 ) 78.4%. 1 89.5% 1,595, 94, 78. 1 99.2% 626, 5., 183 (60.0%) 122 (40.0%). 83 (Table 5). 15 30,290 2011 1.4 (10,721 ) (Table 6). 11 (449,287 ) 14.8., 20,083 5 66.3%., 53.6%, 18.4%, 10.6%, 7.0% 4 90.0%. 0.04%(8 ). 6,130 (20.2%) 15,,,, 5. 5,266 85.9%

230 Table 6. The colony number of insect pollinators for 15 fruit tree crops in 2016 Fruit tree crops Total Colony numbers of insect pollinators Honeybees Masonbee Honeybee, & Mason-bee Apple 19,143 10,769 5,266 2,410 698 0 Peach 91 66 25 0 0 0 Pear 2,139 2,134 0 5 0 0 Persimmon 3,943 3,705 238 0 0 0 Plum 62 62 0 0 0 0 Blueberry 1,797 771 546 0 480 0 Jujube 8 8 0 0 0 0 Korean raspberry 696 696 0 0 0 0 Kiwi 50 50 0 0 0 0 Pomegranate 39 39 0 0 0 0 Raspberry 1,420 1,420 0 0 0 0 Cherry 30 30 0 0 0 0 Boxthorn 292 292 0 0 0 0 Mango 565 26 55 0 0 484 Passion fruit 15 15 0 0 0 0 Total 30,290 (100.0%) 20,083 (66.3%) 6,130 (20.2%) 2,415 (8.0%) 1,178 (3.9%) 484 (1.6%) Flies, 8.9%, 3.9%. 2,415 (8.0%) 15 2 99.8%. 2011 7,346 (75.2%).., 1,178 (3.9%) 59.3%(698 ), 40.7%(480 ). 484 (1.6%) (Table 6). 15 3,300m 2, Fig. 2 3,300m 2 9.4 7.0, 11.5 8.8, 2.4 1.9. 4.0~4.8 (Oneway-ANOVA test: F(2,18)=1.729, p=0.206)., 2016,, 11 15 26. 2011 19 1, 6 6,,,,.. 26 25.8% 2011 0.1%, 2011, 6. 55,208, 26 479,577, 344,690, 119,104, 2,415,,, 2,415, 1,317.,

231 No. of colony/3,300m 2 in vegetable crops 25 20 15 10 5 0 14.2 3.4 15.3 8.4 Honeybees Insect pollinators Fig. 1. The numbers of average colony of insect pollinators used per 3,300m 2 in vegetable crops, 2016. There was significant difference in the number of average colony between honeybees and bumblebees used per 3,300m 2 at T-test. No. of colony/3,300m 2 in fruit crops 25 20 15 10 5 0 9.4 7.0 Honeybees 11.5 8.8 Insect pollinators 2.4 1.9 Mason bees Fig. 2. The colony numbers of insect pollinators per 3,300m 2 for fruit tree crops in 2016. There was significant difference in the colony number of insect pollinators per 3,300m 2 at p<0.05 using one-way ANOVA test. A B Fig. 3. Duration (A) and method (B) of insect pollinators use for 26 horticultural crops in 2016. A B Fig. 4. Education (A) and care (B) for insect pollinators use.

232 (A) 100% a Purchaseprice rate 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Honeybees Mason bees Insect pollinators (B) 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Fig. 5. Purchase price rate (A) and purchase price (B) of insect pollinators for 26 horticultural crops in 2016. Price (Won) a b Honeybees Insect pollinators b Mason bees A B Fig. 6. Advantage (A) and problem (B) of insect pollinators use. A B Fig. 7. Satisfaction degree (A) and plan (B) of insect pollinators use.

233. 1,133 (Fig. 3A), 10 25.9%, 4~6 28.6%, 1 9.2%. 5.7 3.2 (Chi-square Test : X 2 =163.174, df=4, p=0.0001). 1,146 Fig. 3B. 36.6%, 43.0%, 18.5% 95.1%. 1,037 (Fig. 4A), 50.7%, 1~2 33.4% 3~7 15.9% 49.3%. 50%,. (Fig. 4B), 33.6%, 31.5%, 15.5%. (Fig. 5), 9~15 54.9%. 3~6 22.6%,. 18~24 2.6%. 98,147 39,802. 61,303 11,423, 6~9 85.3%, 3~6 13.8%. 58,888 5,665 6~9 77.8%, 3~6 22.2%.,, (welch's ANOVA test F(2,24.185)=211.2721, p<0.0001, (post-hoc analysis : tukey HSD)).,,, (Fig. 6A), (30.5%), (27.3%), (25.8%), (16.4%). 28.4%, 21.0%, 18.6%, 17.3% (Fig. 6B). 1,120 (Fig. 7A), 2.2%,. (Fig. 7B), 39.4%, 57.6%, 3.0% (Fig. 7B). (Yoon et al., 2011a; Yoon et al., 2011b; Yoon et al., 2012).,. 2016,

234 11 15 26. 26 25.8%, 55,208. 26 479,577, 344,690, 119,104, 12,051, 1,317,,, 2,415. 11 59.4%, 100.0%, 99.9%, 93.8%, 82.8%, 64.8%, 63.6%, 31.8%, 5.9%, 1.6%, 1.2%, 0.2%. 11 449,287 72.3%, 25.1%, 0.2%, 2.4%. 15 9.0% 100.0%, 24.0%, 18.3%, 14.0%, 5.5%, 4.5%, 3.8%, 3.1%, 2.7%, 2.2%, 1.0%, 0.4%, 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.02%. 15 30,290 66.3%, 20.2%, 8.0%, 1.6%,,, 3.9%. 97.8%, 97.0%. ( : PJ0100510422017),. Batra, S.W.T. 1995. Bee and pollination in our changing environment. Apidologie 26: 361-370. Dag, A. and Y. Kammer. 2001. Comparison between the effectiveness of honeybee (Apis mellifera) and bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) as pollinators of greenhouse sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum). Am. Bee. J. 141: 447-448. Free, J.B. 1993. Insect pollination of crops. 2nd ed., Academic Press, London. Gallai, N., J.M. Salles, J. Settle and B.E. Vaissiére. 2009. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol. Econ. 68: 810-821. Goulson, D., G.C. Lye and B. Darvill. 2008. Decline and conservation of bumblebees. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53: 191-208. Greenleaf, S. S. and C. Kremen. 2006. Wild bee species increase tomato production and respond differently to surrounding land use in Northern California. Biol. Conserv. 133: 81-87. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. (IPBES). 2016. Summary for policy makers of the assessment report of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services on pollinators, pollination and food production. IPBES. (deliverable 3 (a)) of the 2014-2018 work programme. James, R.J. and T.L. Pitts-Singer. 2008. Bee pollination in agricultural ecosystems. Oxford University Press, New York. Kearns, C.A, Inouye D.W, Waser N. 1998 Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant? pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 83-112. Klein, A.M., B. Vassiere, J.H. Cane, L. Steffan-Dewenter, S.A. Cunningham, C. Kremen. T. Tscharnkle. 2007. Importance of crop pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. Royal. Soc. London. B. 274: 303-313. Morandin, L.A. and M.L. Winston. 2005. Wild bee abundance and seed production in conventional, organic, and genetically modified canola. Ecol. Appl. 15: 871-881. Nabhan, G.P., Buchmann S.L. 1997. Services provided by pollinators. pages 133-150 in G. Daily, editor. Nature s services. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Rao, S. and W.P. Stephen. 2010. Abundance and diversity of native bumble bees associated with agricultural crops: The Willamette valley experience. Psyche volume 2010, Article ID 354072, 9 pages. Shimizu, A, Dohzono I, Nakaji M, Roff DA, Miller DG III, Osato S, Yajima T, Niitsu S, Utsug N. Sugawara T. Yoshimura J. 2014 Fine-tuned bee-flower coevolutionary state hidden within multiple pollination interactions. Sci

235 Rep. 4: 3988. SPSS PASW Statistics 22.0. 2013. PASW Core System User s Guide, SPSS inc. USA. Statistics Korea. 2012. Crops production statistics, 2012/Fruit vegetable/apple. http://www.kostt.go.kr/portal/korea/ kor.pi/index.action. Willmer, P. H. and J.L. Osborne. 2009. Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide. Apidologie 40: 367-387. Winfree, R., T. Griswold and C. Kremen. 2007. Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem. Conserv. Biol. 21: 213-223. Yoon, H.J., K.Y. Lee, M.I. Kim, I.G. Park and Y.C. Choi. 2011a. Current status of insect pollinators use in strawberry crop in Korea. Korean J. Api. 26: 143-155. Yoon, H.J., K.Y. Lee, M.I. Kim, I.G. Park and Y.C. Choi. 2011b. Current status of insect pollinators use in tomato crop in Korea. Korean J. Apiculture 26: 341-353. Yoon, H.J., K.Y. Lee, I.G. Park, M.I. Kim, Y.M. Kim and P.D. Kang. 2012a. Current status of insect pollinators use in apple orchards. Korean J. Apiculture 27: 105-116. Yoon, H.J., K.Y. Lee, I.G. Park., M.I. Kim, Y.M. Kim and P.D. Kang. 2013. Current Status of Insect Pollinators Use for Horticultural Crops in 2011. Korean J. Apiculture 28: 9-18.