: MBT I. MBTI * ** **. 1., (Seol, 199 7 ). (Lee, 1987 )., (Ba n g, 1998 ).. MBTI (Myer s- Br iggs Typ e In dicat or s) J u n g Myer s Briggs 194 1. MBTI J u n g,. ( ), ( ). MBTI. MBTI. (Lee, 1999 ).. * 2 0 0 0 2 **, 2 0 0 1 1 1 12 2 0 0 2 4 2 2 2 0 0 2 8 15-4 4 7 -
2 0 0 2 8 MBTI, (Ba n g, 1998 ), MBTI (Go, 200 0 ) MBTI (Kim, 19 99 ), MBTI (Lee, 1999 ). MBTI (Lee, 19 99 ). MBTI,.,,,,, (Kolb & Br odie, 19 82 ). J u n g,,, (P ar k, 199 1).,....., (Seol, 19 97 )., (Lee, 19 84 ).. (Bibby, 1988 ). MBTI,.. -,,,. MBTI,, MBTI. 2. MBTI MBTI.. 1). 2 ) MBTI. 3 ). 4 ) MBTI 4 (E I, SN, TF, J P ). 5 ) MBTI 4 (E I, SN, TF, J P ) 4. - 4 4 8 -
3 2 4. 1. MBTI 4. 2. 1 7 6, 2 86, 3 33 19 5. 3. 1) - MBTI (Myer- Briggs Type In dicat or ) Kim Sh im (19 90 ) MBTI. MBTI 9 5 (Type In dicat or ) (Ext r averion )- (Int r a ver sion ) ; E I, (Sen sin g)- (intuit ion ) : SN, (Thinking)- (Feeling) : TF, (J u dgem ent )- (P er p cept ion ) : J P. MBTI GS GA GS. MBTI.. E, S, T, J 100 (100 - ). I, N, F, P 100 (100 + ) (Kim, Sh im & J u e, 19 9 5). E I.77, SN.8 1, TF.78, J P.82, EI.86, SN.8 5, TF.8 1, J P.88 (Kim & Sh im, 1990 ). E I.7 5, SN.78, TF.6 7, J P.77. 2 ) -.,. 2 0 2 00. 5. Lee, Kim Kim, P a rk (199 1) 20 4,,,.,,,,, -,,,,,.,,,,,,,,. -.72.7 0..9 2. 4 ) p c- SP SS 10.0,,, P ea r son corr elat ion. 4. 200 0 11 3 12 2 0 MBTI 2 1 7 6, 2 86, 3 33., MBTI MMP I ( ) MBTI 16.. - 4 4 9 -
2 0 0 2 8,,,. 90.. 1. 19 5, 2 86 (44.1%), 1 76 (39.0 %), 3 33 (16.9 %). 90 (4 6.2 %) 7 5 (38.5 %). 54.9 %. <Table 1>. <T a b le 1> Ge n e ra l c h a ract e ris t ics of s u bject ch a r a ct erist ics it em gr a d e fr esh m a n j u n ior senior r eligion pr ot est a nt ca t h olic bu d dist a t h eist birt h or der fir st secon d t h ir d ot h er s pa r ent lived fa t h er dea t h st a t u s m ot h er d ea t h divor sed p ar en t lived fr equ en cy p er cent 76 39.0 86 44.1 33 16.9 90 19 11 75 107 5 1 25 9 12 1 9 170 4 6.2 9.7 5.6 38.5 54.9 26.2 12.8 4.6 6.2 0.5 4.6 87.2 2. MBTI 4 16 <Table 2 >. MBTI. ISTJ 3 5 (17.9 % ), E STJ 3 3 (16.9 % ) ISFJ 2 2 (1 1.3 % ). IN TJ 1 (0.5% ) IN TP. 4 <Ta ble 3 >. - (E I) (Ext r a ver sion ) 113 (57.9 % ), - (SN ) (sensin g) 159 (8 1.5%). - (TF ) (Th inkin g) 106 (54.3 % ) - (P J ) 116 (59 % ). <T a b le 3 > 4 p ref e re n ce p atte rn s o n M BT I in dex ca t egory E I in dex In t r over sion (I) Ext r a ver sion (E ) SN in d ex Sen sing (S) int u it ion (N ) TF in dex Th ink in g (T ) F eelin g (F ) J P in dex P er cept ion (P ) J u dgem en t (J ) 3. fr equ en cy (N ) 82 113 15 9 36 10 6 88 79 116 per cent (% ) 4 2. 1 5 7.9 8 1.5 18.5 54.3 4 5.7 4 1.0 5 9.0. 3.2 7 ( 0.3 9 ), 3.2 5 ( 0.44 ), 3.24 ( 0.5 1). 2.3 6 ( 0.58 ) 2.5 1 ( <T a b le 2 > Pe rs o n a lity ty p e of s u bje ct by M BT I N o. t ype fr equ en cy p er cent N o. t ype fr equ en cy per cent 1 ISTJ 35 17.9 9 IN F J 2 1.0 2 ISTP 9 4.6 10 IN F P 5 2.6 3 E STP 16 8.2 1 1 EN F P 13 6.7 4 E STJ 33 16.9 12 EN F J 4 2.1 5 ISFJ 22 11.3 13 INTJ 1 0.5 6 ISF P 10 5. 1 14 INTP 0 0 7 E SF P 19 9.7 15 ENTP 8 4.1 8 E SF J 16 8.2 16 ENTJ 2 1.0-4 50 -
3 2 4 <T a b le 4 > Def e n s e m ec h a n is m of s u bject N = 19 5 Mea n St d. Devi. Min Ma x Br a gging 2.8 2 0.4 9 1.50 4.5 0 Rea ct ion form a t ion 3.0 6 0.4 2 2. 10 4.2 0 Id en t ifica t ion 3.2 7 0.39 2.30 4.5 0 P a ssive Aggr essive 2.5 3 0.4 5 1.50 4.10 Displa cem ent 2.5 9 0.4 7 1.20 4.0 0 Denia l 2.5 8 0.37 1.4 0 3.6 0 Cont r ollin g 3.0 6 0.4 1 2.20 4.5 0 Su ppr ession 3.2 5 0.4 5 2. 10 4.5 0 Dist ort ion 2.9 2 0.4 3 1.70 4.0 0 Ant icip at ion 3.0 3 0.54 1.30 4.4 0 Ra t ion aliza t ion 3.0 7 0.39 1.90 4.3 0 Dissocia t ion 2.94 0.55 1.4 0 4.4 0 Som a t izat ion 2.7 8 0.67 1.20 4.5 0 Su blim at ion 2.8 2 0.4 8 1.70 4.8 0 Act ing ou t 2.3 6 0.58 1.20 4.5 0 Alt ru ism 3.18 0.5 1 1.50 4.7 0 Regr ession 3.18 0.4 8 1.70 4.6 0 H u m or 3.24 0.5 1 2. 10 4.9 0 Eva sion 2.7 3 0.4 5 1.30 4.2 0 P r oj ect ion 2.5 1 0.4 5 1.20 3.8 0 0.4 5), 2.57 ( 0.37 ) <Ta ble 4 >. 4. MBT I 4 MBTI 4 4, EI, SN, TF, J P <Table 5 >. E I 7, (-.4 3 7 **) (-.307 **), (-.29 5 **), (-.28 2 **), (-.4 88 **). (ext r aver sion ). (.280 **), (.19 9 **). SN 6 (.180 *), - (.234 **), (.168 *), (.168 *), (.2 56 **) 5 (int u it ion ), (-.2 53 **) (sen sin g). TF 2, (-.2 67 **), (.16 1**). J P 12, (.260 **), (.17 6 *), - (.4 07 **), (.188 *), (.367 **), (.34 0 **), (.27 5 **), (.192 *) (.222 **). (-.224 **), (-.6 17 **), (-.190 *). 5. 4 MBT I 4 Lee (199 1) 4,,, MBTI <Ta ble 6 >. J P - 4 5 1 -
2 0 0 2 8 <T a b le 5 > Co rre lat io n b etw e e n d ef e n s iv e m ec h a n is m a n d 4 p ref e re nc e p att e rns o n M BT I N = 19 5 E I in d ex SN in dex TF in dex J P in dex Br a gging -.07 8 -.064 -.0 83. 13 5 Rea ct ion form a t ion -.034. 180 *.0 79.26 0 ** Id en t ifica t ion -.06 2.068.13 1. 17 6 * P a ssive Aggr essive.09 9.234 **.0 23.4 0 7 ** Displa cem ent.064.0 18.1 14. 13 9 Denia l -.0 16.082.0 18. 134 Cont r ollin g -.4 3 7 **. 168 * -.0 02. 15 0 * Su ppr ession -.03 5 -.063 -. 135 -.224 ** Dist ort ion -.30 7 **.09 1 -.108 -.04 1 Ant icip at ion -.03 3 -.253 ** -.2 67 ** -.6 17 ** Ra t ion aliza t ion -.09 0 -.06 1 -.158 * -. 19 0 * Dissocia t ion. 12 6.037.0 53. 18 8 * Som a t izat ion.07 9 -.0 14 -.0 55.07 1 Su blim at ion -.29 5 **. 113 -.0 12 -.08 8 Act ing ou t -.02 5. 168 *.04 7.36 7 ** Alt ru ism -.28 2 **.098.16 1* -. 12 0 Regr ession.04 1.070.0 89.34 0 ** H u m or -.4 8 8 **.256 **.128.27 5 ** Eva sion.28 0 **.062.0 50. 19 2 * P r oj ect ion. 19 9 * -.04 1 -.04 0.22 2 ** ** Cor r elat ion is sign ifican t a t t h e 0.0 1 level (2- t ailed ). * Cor r elat ion is sign ifican t a t t h e 0.05 level (2- t ailed ). <T a b le 6 > Co rre lat io n b etw e e n 4 p ref e re nc e p att e rns o n M BT I a n d d ef e n s iv e m e c h a n is m N = 19 5 fa ct or u n st a ble in dex sen sit iza t ion ego- expa n sive ego- denia l r ealit y ev a sive E I in d ex.109 -.5 19 ** -.04 7.03 6 SN in dex.0 7 1.207 **.0 70 -. 10 0 TF in d ex.0 12.059.0 76 -.20 0 ** J P in d ex.2 16 **.0.4 8.3 06 ** -.30 5 ** ** Corr elat ion is significa n t at t h e 0.0 1 level (2- t a iled ).. E I SN,,. J P. TF, J P,.. ISTJ (17.9 %) ESTJ, ISF J, E SF P, E SF J E STP. ISTJ. (Myer s & McCa u lley, 199 5). E STJ (Myer s & McCa u lley, 199 5 ). Kim (199 8 ) MBTI ISTJ ISTJ (Kim et a l., 19 9 5).. - 4 52 -
3 2 4 ISTP, E STP, ISF P, ENTP (U slia n er, 1990 ; Pr ovost, 19 8 5), Kim (199 9 ) E STP, E STJ, E SF P, EN F P. E STJ ISTJ, ISF J, E STP, ISTP.. " ", " ", " ". Lee (19 9 1),,,,., (Ka n g, 199 9 ). " ",,, (Lee et a l., 199 1). " ". " ",. P a rk (199 1) 1320,,,,,,.,,,, -,,,,,,,,,,,,. " " P ar k (199 1).. 4, (E ) (I) (E ) 57.9 %. Lee (19 99 ) (E ) 60 % (I). Kim (1998 ) (E ). (E ). (I). (Kim et a l., 199 5).,,,,,..,,,, Lee (199 1), ' '..,, (Lee et al., 199 1)., (Kim, 19 94 ), (P ar k, 199 1). - 4 5 3 -
2 0 0 2 8. (S ) (N ). 8 1.5%. Lee (199 9 ) (S ) 86 % (N ).,, -,,,.,.., -,,...., 54.3 %. Lee (19 99 ) (T ) 7 6 % (F ). Kim (199 8 ) (T ) (T ). (T ),.. (F ) (Sh im & Kim, 19 97 ).,.. 59.0 %. Lee (1999 ) (P ) 68 % (J ), Lee (1999 ). Kim (19 99 ) (P ) (J ). (P ). (J ). (P ) (Kim et al., 199 5).,, -,,,,,,,,.,,, (Lee et al., 199 1). Tob a cyk, Wells Spriger (19 88 ),,,. (P ) (J ) - 4 54 -
3 2 4 (Sh im & Kim, 199 7 ). -.,, (Kim, 1994 ). 4, ' ',,,, - (Lee et a l., 19 9 1). J P.,,.. ' ',,,,. E I SN,,. ' ',,,.. J P. ' ' TF, J P,.,,,,..... - " ", " ".,,,, -. - MBTI.. MBTI. 19 5 2 000 1 1 3 12 16, MBTI Orient a t ion MBTI.. 1. : ISTJ, E STJ, ISF J. 4 - (E I) (E ), - (SN ) (S ). - (TF ) (T ) - (PJ ). 2. :,,. 3. MBTI 4-4 5 5 -
2 0 0 2 8 : (ext r aver sion ),,,,,,. (int u it ion ), -,,,, (sen sin g). (t h ink in g), (feelin g). (per ceive ),, -,,,,,, (j u dgem ent ).,. 4. MBTI 4 4 :.,..,.. 1. MBTI (SJ, SP, N F, N T ). 2. MBTI. 3. MBTI.,,. Re f e re n ce s Ba n g, H. G. (19 98 ). T h e effect s of M BT I Grou p act ion al on t h e d egree of self -ot h er accep t an ces an d t h e grow t h of self -est eem according t o t h e p erson ality t y p es of girl 's h igh sch ool st u dent s, U n pu blish ed doct or a l dissert at ion, U niver sit y of Don g- a, Bu sa n. Bibby, C. J. (19 88 ). T h e effect of self - accept an ce t raining on academ ic ach iev em ent an d self -est eem in m in ority h igh sch ool y ou t h, Doct or al dissert at ion. U niver sit y of Texa s a t Au st in. Go, K. O. (200 0 ). T h e effect of M BT I im prov em en t program on t h e adolescent 's lat ent delinqu en cy. Gr a du at e Sch ool of Edu cat ion, Ch ej u N at ion al U niver sit y Ch ej u, Kor ea. Gou, S. K. (1994 ). T h e relat ion sh ip of p ot ent ial m isd eed t en den cy an d p erson ality ty p e on M BT I. U n pu blish ed doct or a l dissert a t ion, U n iver sit y of Bu - sa n, Bu sa n. Ka n g, I. S. (199 9 ). A st u dy on a fact or of st ress of t een agers an d relat ion t o defen se m ech anism, Gr a du a t e Sch ool of E du ca t ion, Ch ej u N at ion al U niver sit y Ch ej u, Kor ea. Kim, S. Y. (19 98 ). R elat ion sh ip b et w een p erson ality t y p es on M BT I an d adolescent 's sch ool adj u st m en t, Gr a du at e Sch ool of Sook m yu n g Wom en ' s U n iver sit y. Kim, J. N. (1994 ). T h e relat ion sh ip b et w een sex role t y p e an d defen se M ech anism, U n pu blish ed m a st er ' s t h esis, U niver sit y of Kor ea, Seou l. Kim, J. E., Lee, K. H., Kim, J. G., P a rk, Y. S. (199 1). Th e in spect ion ou t lin e of cr oss- defen se m ech a nism, J ou rn al of H a -n a m edical. Kim, J. T., Sh im, H. S. (19 90 ). A st u dy a bou t Kor ea st a n da r dizat ion of MBTI, J ou r n al of Psych ological t ype, Cou nsel an d Psy ch ological Cu re, 3 (1), 44-72. Kim, M. K. (199 9 ). Dev elop m ent an d effect of M BT I p sy ch oedu cat ion program for t h e p erceiv ing ty p e adolescent s b ased on t h e relat ion sh ip b et w een p erson ality ty p e an d beh av ioral ch aract erist ics, Gr a du at e Sch ool, - 4 56 -
3 2 4 Pu sa n N at ion al U niver sit y. Kim, J. T., Sh im, H. S., J u e, S. B. (199 5 ). M BT I dev elopm ent an d app licat ion, Kor ea psych ological t est in g in st it u t e. Kolb, L. C., & Br odie, H. K. (1982 ). M odern Clinical Psy ch iat ry, 10t h ed, Sa u n der s, Ph ila delph ia Lee, K. H. (198 7 ). S t u dy of grou p cou n selling act iv ity for p roblem beh av ior cont rol of w om en 's h igh sch ool st u dent s, Gr a du a t e sch ool of edu ca t ion Inh a U niver sit y. Lee, K. R. (19 99 ). T h e effect of self -growt h program u sing on t h e M BT I ab ou t self im age an d m an agem ent of m aladj u st m ent t ech nical h igh sch ool st u den t s, Gr a du a t e Sch ool of E du ca t ion, Silla U niver sit y. Lee, S. L. (19 99 ) T h e effect of t h e relat ion sh ip s im p rov em ent program for college st u dent s ' relat ion sh ip s im prov em ent t h rou gh M BT I. Gr a du a t e Sch ool of Edu cat ion Keim yu n g U n iver sit y Lee, K. R. (19 99 ). T h e effect of self -growt h program u sing t h e M BT I abou t self im age an d goal m an agem ent of m aladj u st m ent t ech nical h igh sch ool st u den t s, Gr a du a t e Sch ool of E du ca t ion Silla U niver sit y. Lee, H. D. (1984 ). T h eoret ical app roach of cou n selling. seou l : Hu n gsu l pu blish in g com pa n y. Lee, K. H., Kim, J. E., Kim, J. K., P ar k, Y. S. (199 1) A St a n dar diza t ion st u dy of EWHA defen se m ech a nism t est (E DMT ), J. Korean N eu rop sy ch iat ric A ssoc V ol 30, N o 3, 582-592. Lee, S. L. (19 99 ). T h e effect of t h e R elat ion sh ip im prov em en t program for college st u dent 's relat ion sh ip s im prov em ent t h rou gh M BT I, U n pu blish ed d oct or a l dissert at ion, U niver sit y of Keim yu n g, Da egu. Lee, K. H., P a rk, Y. S. (19 90 ). Th e pa st Kor ea n self- defen se m ech a nism in t h e old sa yin g, N eu rop sy ch iat ry, 29 (3 ), 72 1-732. Myer s, I., & McCau llry, M. (19 9 5). Dev elopm ent an d applicat ion of M BT I (Kim, J. T., Sh im, H. S., J a e, S. B. t r a n sla t e ), Kor ea n P sych ological Lab, seou l. Pr ovost, J. A. (198 5 ). "Type Wa ch in g" a n d college at t rit ion. J ou rn al of Psy ch ological ty p e, 9, 16-23. P a rk, K. H. (199 1). A st u dy t h e self -defen se m ech anism of Korean s, U n pu blish ed doct or al dissert at ion, U niver sit y of E- h w a wom en s, seou l. Seol, G. M. (199 7 ). H u m an b ein g relat ion an d m ent al h ealt h, Seou l, H akj isa. Sh im, H. S., Kim, M. K. (1997 ). MBTI gr owt h pr ogr a m d evelopm ent a n d effect ver ifica t ion for a j u ven ile. J ou rn al of Psy ch ological Ty p e, 4, 52-7 8. Tob a cyk, J., Wells, D., Sprin ger, T. (19 98 ). J u n gia n t ype a n d self- con cept in j u nior h igh sch ool st u den t s a t h igh r isk for dr opou t, J ou rn al of Psy ch ological Ty p e, 16, 4 7-53. U slia n er, M. (1990 ). T h e com bin ed u se of M BT I, Ba ll St at e U niver sit y. Vallia nt, G. E. (197 1). Th eor et ica l h ier a r ch y a da pt ive ego m ech a nism, A rch, Gen, Psy ch iat, 2 5, 107-1 18. - Ab s t r a c t - A St u d y on MBTI Per s on a lit y Ty p e a n d Defen s e Me ch a n is m of Nu r s in g College St u d en t * Hw a n g, S e u n g -S ook ** Kim, Eu n -J oo ** P u r p o s e : Th e pr im ar y pu r pose of t h is st u dy is t o pr ovide a u sefu l in sigh t for developin g effect ive t ea ch in g a n d st u dent cou n selin g m et h ods by u n der st a n din g t h e r ela t ion sh ip * T h is r e s e a r ch w a s fu n d e d by Kyu n gin W om en ' s Colleg e in 2 0 0 0 ** As sist a n t P r offe s s or. D ep t. of N u r sin g, Kyu n gin W om en ' s Colleg e - 4 5 7 -
2 0 0 2 8 b et ween fou r pr efer en ce pa t t er n s of MBTI p er son a lit y t ypes a n d EWHA defen se m ech a nism s of n u r sin g college st u dent s. Me t h o d : Th e d at a u sed in t h is r esea r ch w er e collect ed a dminist r a t in g EWHA defen se m ech a nism t est a n d MBTI p er son a lit y t ype in st ru m ent t o 19 5 nu r sin g st u den t s in t h e p er iod of N ovemb er 3 t h r ou gh Sept emb er 16 in 2 000. Collect ed da t a wer e a n a lysed by p c- SP SS 10.0. Re s u l t : Th r ee gen er a l con clu sion s wer e dr aw n fr om t h e st u dy r esu lt s : (1) in t er m s of p er son a lit y t yp e, ' Ext r a ver sion ', ' Sen sin g', ' Th ink in g', a n d ' J u d gem ent ' t ypes sh owed h igh fr equ en cy r espect ively ; (2 ) in t erm s of defen se m ech a nism, ' Ident ificat ion ' sh owed t h e h igh est scor e, a n d t h en ' su ppr ession ' scor ed n ext follow ed by ' Hu m or '. H owever, 'Act in g ou t ' sh owed t h e lowest aver a ge scor e, a n d t h en ' Pr oj ect ion ' followed by ' Denia l' ; (3 ) Ba sed on t h e r elat ion sh ip bet w een defen se m ech a nism a n d fou r MBTI pr efer en ce pa t t er n s, it ca n b e dr aw n t h a t st u dent s wit h t h e pr efer en ce of ' Ext r a ver sion ' u su a lly u se defen se m ech a nism of 'Alt ru ism ', ' Su blim at ion ', ' Dist ort ion ', ' Cont r ollin g', a n d ' Hu m or '. In com p ar ison, st u d ent s wit h t h e pr efer en ce of ' In t r over sion ' oft en u se t h e defen ce m ech a n ism of ' Eva sion ' a n d ' Pr oj ect ion '. Co n c lu s i o n : Th e st u dy r esu lt s ca n be u t ilized in bot h fields of edu ca t ion a n d cou n selin g : (1) in t h e field of edu ca t ion, t h is st u dy ca n pr ovide a ba sis for developin g a su it able t ea ch in g m et h od for ea ch per son alit y t yp es of nu r sin g st u dent s ; (2 ) for cou n selin g pr a ct it ion er s, t h e r esu lt s of t h is st u dy pr ovide t h e u sefu l in sigh t s t o u n der st a n d nu r sin g college st u dent s ' comm u n icat ion skills, beh avior p at t er n s, a n d a bilit y of copin g wit h pr oblem s in t h e pr ocess of cou n selin g. Ke y w o rd s : MBTI p er son a lit y t ypes, Defen se Mech a nism - 4 58 -