KISEP Original Articles J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc Vol 38, No 1 DSM-III-R 주요우울증에대한한국어판 Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS) 의진단적타당성연구 * 조맹제 1)

Similar documents
012임수진



Lumbar spine

노인정신의학회보14-1호

Rheu-suppl hwp


1..

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구


Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ

- 최원희ㆍ 김명희: 중년후기 여성의 집단회상 경험과 효과에 대한 연구 - 에 직면하며 심리 사회적인 역할갈등, 고립, 위축, 상실 감 등을 경험하게 된다. 이 시기동안 위기에 잘 대처하 지 못하면 자신에 대하여 실망하며 두려움과 슬픔 등 을 겪으면서 자아존중감이 낮아

139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ

歯1.PDF

서론 34 2

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

±èÇ¥³â

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

16(1)-3(국문)(p.40-45).fm

J Korean Neurol Assoc / Volume 21 / August, 2003 The Validity and Reliability of the Korean Modified Mini-Mental State (K-3MS) Examination Eun-Hee Soh

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

(Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern (Micro- Environment) Re

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

서론 1. 연구대상 1) 정상군 연구대상및방법 2) 성격장애군 526

Jkcs022(89-113).hwp

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )


A 617

1. 연구대상 연구방법 2. 측정도구 3. 명상법소개및연구절차 492

달생산이 초산모 분만시간에 미치는 영향 Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 達 은 23) 의 丹 溪 에 최초로 기 재된 처방으로, 에 복용하면 한 다하여 난산의 예방과 및, 등에 널리 활용되어 왔다. 達 은 이 毒 하고 는 甘 苦 하여 氣, 氣 寬,, 結 의 효능이 있

untitled

04조남훈

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

결론 중심단어 서론 HDS-R 번안 방법 527


878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

online ML Comm ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2012;51:77-84 ISSN 한국판정신장애진단선별질문지의표준화연구 : 최적절단점 계명대학교의과대학동산의료원정

Æ÷Àå½Ã¼³94š

12이문규

14.531~539(08-037).fm

서론


???? 1

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

( ) ) ( )3) ( ) ( ) ( ) 4) 1915 ( ) ( ) ) 3) 4) 285

전립선암발생률추정과관련요인분석 : The Korean Cancer Prevention Study-II (KCPS-II)

<35BFCFBCBA2E687770>


278 경찰학연구제 12 권제 3 호 ( 통권제 31 호 )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

노인의학 PDF

184

자기공명영상장치(MRI) 자장세기에 따른 MRI 품질관리 영상검사의 개별항목점수 실태조사 A B Fig. 1. High-contrast spatial resolution in phantom test. A. Slice 1 with three sets of hole arr

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

KD hwp

03이경미(237~248)ok

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

( )Kju225.hwp

online ML Comm ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2013;52: ISSN 한글판우울증선별도구 (Patient Health Qustionnaire-2)

Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

09È«¼®¿µ 5~152s

치매선별용설문지 SIRQD 개발 D.Y. Lee, et al - 연구방법 대상자및정보제공자의선정 연구대상자 정보제공자 210

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>


., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

歯14.양돈규.hwp

도비라

Kbcs002.hwp

< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

09구자용(489~500)

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

27 2, 1-16, * **,,,,. KS,,,., PC,.,,.,,. :,,, : 2009/08/12 : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/30 * ** ( :

<303720C7CFC1A4BCF86F6B2E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

(



hwp

,......

<302DC5EBC0CFB0FA20C6F2C8AD28BFCF292E687770>

Pharmacotherapeutics Application of New Pathogenesis on the Drug Treatment of Diabetes Young Seol Kim, M.D. Department of Endocrinology Kyung Hee Univ

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

,......

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

02이용배(239~253)ok

<35335FBCDBC7D1C1A42DB8E2B8AEBDBAC5CDC0C720C0FCB1E2C0FB20C6AFBCBA20BAD0BCAE2E687770>

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

159

03-ÀÌÁ¦Çö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

결과 : 결론 : 중심단어 서론 1366

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Transcription:

KISEP Original Articles 38 1 1999 J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc Vol 38, No 1 DSM-III-R 주요우울증에대한한국어판 Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS) 의진단적타당성연구 * 조맹제 1) 배재남 2) 서국희 3) 함봉진 4) 김장규 5) 이동우 1) 강민희 2) 국문초록 연구목적 : Validation of Geriatric Depression Scale, Korean VersionGDS in the Assessment of DSM-III-R Major Depression* Maeng Je Cho, M.D., 1) Jae Nam Bae, M.D., 2) Guk Hee Suh, M.D., 3) Bong Jin Hahm, M.D., 4) Jang Kyu Kim, M.D., 5) Dong Woo Lee, M.D., 1) Min Hee Kang, M.D. 2) 방법 : 결과 : Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Inha University, Inchon Department of Psychiatry, Hankang Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul Department of Psychiatry, Chungnung Evangelical Hospital Department of Psychiatry, Yonchon Medical Center Corresponding author 48

결론 : 중심단어 서론 49

1. 번역및예비연구 1) GDS 의번역 연구방법 2) 예비연구 50

2. 본연구 1) 연구대상 2) 연구방법 3) 면담도구 51

52

4) 자료분석 연구결과 53

Table 1. Comparison of clinical variables between the two groups, major depression group and non major depression group Total subject N88 N% Major depression N35 N% Non major depression N51 N% AgemeanSD 65.486.19 65.406.22 65.276.16 Sex Male 2933 925.7 2039.2 Female 5967 2674.3 3160.8 Educationyears None 2234.3 1234.3 917.6 16 3337.5 1440 1937.3 79 1112.5 2 5.7 917.6 1012 1011.4 3 8.6 611.8 Above 13 1213.6 411.4 815.7 No. of case having current 4753.4 1851.4 2752.9 physical disorder No. of case living with spouse 6978.4 3085.7 3976.5 Mean score of MMSE-K 25.403.83 24.943.21 25.714.26 1. 한국어판 GDS의신뢰도검증 1) 내적일관성 (Internal consistency) 2. 한국어판 GDS의타당도검증 1) 한국어판 GDS와다른우울측정검사도구와의상관관계 Table 2. Correlations of the GDS with other depression scales GDS SGDS CES-D HRS-D MMSE-K GDS 1.000*.9594*.7415*.7788*.0541 SGDS 1.000*.6933*.7490*.0974 CES-D 1.000*.7949*.0659 HRS-D 1.000*.1057 MMSE-K 1.000* Note*p.001 2) 주요우울증환자군과비주요우울증환자군과의문항별점수및총점비교 54

Table 3. Comparison of GDS scoresmeans.d. among different groups Major Non major Total subject depression depression P N88 N35 N51 Item 1 # 0.490.50 0.570.50 0.410.50 n Item 2 # 0.820.39 0.970.17 0.710.46 * Item 3 # 0.490.50 0.740.17 0.290.46 ** Item 4 # 0.550.50 0.860.36 0.310.47 ** Item 5 0.520.50 0.800.36 0.370.49 ** Item 6 0.520.50 0.830.38 0.310.47 ** Item 7 # 0.670.47 0.800.41 0.590.50 * Item 8 # 0.560.50 0.710.46 0.430.50 * Item 9 # 0.530.50 0.830.38 0.310.47 ** Item 10 # 0.490.50 0.890.32 0.200.40 ** Item 11 0.480.50 0.770.43 0.250.44 ** Item 12 # 0.420.50 0.630.49 0.290.46 * Item 13 0.490.50 0.740.44 0.310.47 ** Item 14 # 0.560.50 0.710.46 0.430.50 * Item 15 # 0.520.50 0.890.32 0.250.44 ** Item 16 0.610.49 0.800.41 0.470.50 * Item 17 # 0.410.49 0.690.47 0.200.40 ** Item 18 0.360.48 0.570.50 0.240.43 ** Item 19 0.650.48 0.940.24 0.430.50 ** Item 20 0.740.44 0.890.32 0.630.49 * Item 21 # 0.780.41 0.860.36 0.730.45 n Item 22 # 0.510.50 0.830.38 0.270.45 ** Item 23 # 0.420.50 0.690.47 0.220.42 ** Item 24 0.570.50 0.690.47 0.510.51 n Item 25 0.440.50 0.690.47 0.250.44 ** Item 26 0.590.49 0.740.44 0.470.50 * Item 27 0.580.50 0.710.46 0.490.51 * Item 28 0.430.50 0.690.47 0.250.44 ** Item 29 0.640.48 0.690.47 0.590.50 n Item 30 0.760.43 0.800.41 0.730.45 n Total 16.638.07 23.004.50 11.966.83 ** SGDS 8.224.53 11.662.65 5.653.85 ** pp-value in T-test for GDS score between major depression group and non major depression group *p.05, **p.001, nnon-significant # indicates items of SGDS Table 4. Item-total correlation in GDS Total subject N88 Major depression N35 Non major depression N51 Item 1 0.5134** 0.2999 0.6704** Item 2 0.5290** 0.1550 0.4861** Item 3 0.6438** 0.5463** 0.5063** Item 4 0.7370** 0.3320 0.6848** Item 5 0.5890** 0.5163** 0.4661** Item 6 0.5567** 0.1370 0.4412** Item 7 0.4857** 0.1775 0.6135** Item 8 0.5145** 0.3000 0.5142** Item 9 0.7261** 0.3254 0.6973** Item 10 0.7515** 0.6288** 0.4993** Item 11 0.5922** 0.4764* 0.3426* Item 12 0.4445** 0.4541* 0.3218* Item 13 0.5219** 0.3692* 0.3787* Item 14 0.4089** 0.0857 0.3855* Item 15 0.7439** 0.5882** 0.5421** Item 16 0.6729** 0.3227 0.7546** Item 17 0.7075** 0.5978** 0.5942** Item 18 0.4948** 0.5347** 0.3700* Item 19 0.7130** 0.0834 0.6722** Item 20 0.3624** 0.0609 0.2773* Item 21 0.4541** 0.3135 0.5290** Item 22 0.6516** 0.4966* 0.4322* Item 23 0.6024** 0.3336* 0.4893** Item 24 0.4427** 0.3892* 0.5509** Item 25 0.5922** 0.2502 0.5488** Item 26 0.5259** 0.3101 0.5397** Item 27 0.3591** 0.3000 0.3130* Item 28 0.5499** 0.5422** 0.3559* Item 29 0.3034* 0.4727* 0.2425 Item 30 0.3195* 0.2581 0.3861* Note. *p.05, **p.001. 55

Table 5. Item-total correlation in SGDS Major Non major Total subject depression depression N88 N35 N51 Item 1 0.5686** 0.5505** 0.6521** Item 2 0.5391** 0.1090 0.5158** Item 3 0.7099** 0.7000** 0.5788** Item 4 0.7781** 0.4787* 0.7275** Item 7 0.5164** 0.4000* 0.5912** Item 8 0.4336** 0.1352 0.4128* Item 9 0.7424** 0.4054* 0.7053** Item 10 0.8007** 0.6417** 0.6285** Item 12 0.4905** 0.5793** 0.3757* Item 14 0.4184** 0.0866 0.4025* Item 15 0.7476** 0.4694* 0.5969** Item 17 0.7500** 0.6192** 0.5192** Item 21 0.4480** 0.2908 0.5293** Item 22 0.7128** 0.6090** 0.5236** Item 23 0.6284** 0.3831* 0.4893** Note. *p.05, **p.001 3) 각문항의변별도분석 Table 6. The values of accuracy indices according to various cut-off scores of the GDS Cut-off SE SP FNR FPR PPV NPV Kappa. 14.9429.5686.0571.4314.6000.9355.4694 15.9429.6471.0571.3529.6471.9429.5504 16.9429.6863.0571.3137.6735.9459.5920 17 a.9429.7451.0571.2549.7174.9500.6556 18.9143.7843.0857.2157.7442.9302.6744 19 b.9143.8235.0857.1765.7805.9333.7185 20.8571.8627.1429.1373.8108.8980.7135 21.7714.8824.2286.1176.8182.8491.6597 22.6286.8824.3714.1176.7857.7759.5275 Note. Cut-offCut-off score, SESensitivity, SPSpecificity, TPRTrue positive rate, FNRFalse negative rate, FPRFalse positve rate, PPVPositive predictive value, NPVNegative predictive value, Kappa.Kappa value a Optimal cut-off score estimated to screen major depression b Cut-off score indicated by ROC curve analysis 3. 최적절단점의추정 56

Table 7. The values of accuracy indices according to various cut-off scores of the SGDS Cut-off SE SP FNR FPR PPV NPV Kappa. 6.9429.5490.0571.4510.5893.9333.4496 7.9429.6471.0571.3529.6471.9429.5504 8 a.9429.7255.0571.2745.7021.9487.6342 9.8857.7647.1143.2353.7209.9070.6279 10 b.8571.8627.1429.1373.8108.8980.7135 11.7143.8627.2857.1373.7813.8148.5849 12.6000.9216.4000.0784.8400.7705.5460 Note. Cut-offCut-off score, SESensitivity, SPSpecificity, TPRTrue positive rate, FNRFalse negative rate, FPRFalse positve rate, PPVPositive predictive value, NPVNegative predictive value, Kappa.Kappa value a Optimal cut-off score estimated to screen major depression b Cut-off score indicated by ROC curve analysis Fig. 1. ROC curve analysis depicting SGDS, GDS, CES-D, HRS-D indicates optimal cutoff point, GDS19, SGDS10 4. ROC커브분석법에의한, 우울증선별검사들의주요우울증진단 (DSM-III-R) 에대한진단적타당성분석 고찰 57

58

59

참고문헌 1) Weissmann MM, Bruce ML, Leaf PJ(1991):Affective disorder. In;LE Robins and DA Regier, eds. Psychiatric disorder in America:The Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study, The Free Press, New York 2) Koenig HG, Blazer DG(1992):Epidemiology of geriatric affective disorders. Clin Geriatr Med 8: 235-251 3) 조맹제, 김계희 (1993): 주요우울증환자예비평가에서 CES-D의진단적타당도연구. 신경정신의학 32:381-399 4) 김광일 (1977): 우울증의증후학적연구. 제1편 : Hamilton 우울증측정표의적응을위한연구. 신경정신의학 16:36-45 5) 송옥헌 (1977): 정신과외래환자의 the Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS) 에관한연구. 신경정신의학 16:84-94 6) 신승철, 김만권, 윤관수, 김진학, 이명선, 문수재, 이민준, 이호영, 유계준 (1991) : 한국에서의 the Center for Epidemiologic studies Depression Scale (CES-D) 의사용 : 표준화및요인구조에대한횡문화적검토. 신경정신의학 30:752-762 7) 한홍무, 염태호, 신영우, 김교헌, 윤도준, 정근재 (1986):Beck depression inventory의한국판표준화연구. 신경정신의학 25:487-502 8) Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO(1983):Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. J Psychiat Res 17:37-49 9) Kahn RL, Zarit SH, Hilbert LM, Niederehe G (1975):Memory complaint and impairment in the aged:the effect of depression and altered brain function. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32:1569-1573 10) Salzman C, Shader RI(1978):Depression in the elderly:relationship between depression, psychologic defense mechanism and physical illness. J Am Geriat Soc 26:253-259 11) Wells CE(1979):Pseudodementia. Am J Psychiatry 136:895-900 12) Sheikh VI, Yesavage VA(1986):Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS):Recent evidence and development of shorter version. In TL Brink(Ed), Clinical Gerontology;A guide to assessment and intervention, New York Haworth Press, pp165-174 13) Alden D, Austin C, Sturgeon R(1989):A correlation between the geriatric depression scale long and short forms. Journal of Gerontology 44:124-125 14) Cwikel J, Ritchie K(1988):The short GDS:Evaluation in a heterogeneous, multilingual population. Clinical Gerontologist 8:63-71 60

15) Lesher EL, Berryhill JS(1994):Validation of the geriatric depression scale-short form among inpatients. J of Clin Psychol 50:256-260 16) Hamilton M(1960):Rating depressive patients. J Clin Psychiatry 41:21-24 17) Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS (1981):National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule:It s history, characteristics and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38:381-389 18) 조맹제, 함봉진, 주진형, 배재남, 권준수 (1998): 일도시지역사회노인들의인지기능장애와우울증상의유병율. 신경정신의학 37:352-361 19) 권용철, 박종한 (1989): 노인용한국판 Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE-K) 의표준화연구 - 제1편 : MMSE-K의개발-. 신경정신의학 28 : 125-135 20) 이정균, 김용식, 한진희, 최진옥 (1986): 한국정신장애의역학적조사연구 (VII)-한국어판 DIS의제작-. 서울의대정신의학 11( 부록 ), pp235-242 21) Hyer L, Blount J(1984):Concurrent and discriminant validities of the geriatric depression scale with older psychiatric inpatients. Psychol Rep 54:611-616 22) Norris JT, Gallaghter D, Wilson A, Winograd CH (1987):Assessment of Depression in Geriatric Medical Outpatients;The validity of two screening measures. J Am Geriatr Soc 35:989-995 23) Zgourides G, Spofford M, Doppelt L(1989):The Geriatric Depression Scale;Discriminant validity and elderly daytreatment clients. Psycho Rep 64:1082 24) Lesher EL(1986):Validation of the geriatric depression scale among nursing home residents. Clinical Gerontologist 4:21-28 25) McGivney SA, Mulvihill M, Taylor B(1994):Validation of GDS depression screen in the nursing home. J Am Geriatr Soc 42:490-492 26) Koenig H, Meador KG, Cohen HG, Blazer DG (1988):Self-rated depression scale and screening for major depression in older hospitalized patients with medical illness. J Am Geriatr Soc 36:699-706 27) Gerety MB, Williams Jr JW, Mulrow CD, Cornell JE, Kadri AA, Rosenberg J, Chiodo LK, Long M (1994):Performance of case-finding tools for depression in nursing home:influence of clinical and functional characteristics and selection of optimal threshold scores. J Am Geriatr Soc 42:1103-1109 28) Radolf LS(1977):The CES-D Scale:A report depression scale for research in general population. Apple Psychol Measurement 1:385-401 29) Radloff LS, Locke BZ(1986):The community mental health survey and CES-D scale:in community survey of psychiatric disoreder. Edited by Weissmann MM, Myers JD, Ross CE. New Burniswick NJ. Ruters university press 30) Eaton WW, Kessler LG(1981):Rate of symptoms of deprssion in a national sample. Am J Epidemiol 114:528-538 31) Hamilton M(1967):Development of rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J of Soc & Clin Psychology 6:287-296 32) Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR(1975): Mini-mental state:a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189-198 33) Murphy JM, Berwick DM, Weinstein MC, Borus JF, Budman SH, Klerman GL(1987):Performance of screening and diagnostic tests:application of receiver operating characteristics analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44:550-555 34) Weinstein MC, Berwick DM, Goldman PA, Murphy JM, Barsky AJ(1989):A comparison of three psychiatric screening test using receiver operating characteristics(roc) analysis. Med Care 27:593-607 35) Gavin DR, Ross HE, Skinner HA(1989):Diagnostic validity of the drug abuse screening test in the assessment of DSM-III drug disorder. Br J Addiction 84:301-307 36) Hsaio JK, Bartko JJ, Potter WZ(1989):Diagnosing diagnoses:receiver operating characteristic methods and psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46:664-667 37) Hanley JA, McNeil BJ(1983):A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 149:839-43 38) Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P(1991):Clinical epidemiology:a basic science for clinical medicine, 2nd edition. Little Brown and company, Boston 39) Husaini BA, Neff JA, Harrington JB, Houghes MD, Stone RH(1980):Depression in rural communities: Validating the CES-D scale. J Community Psychology 8:20-27 61

ABSTRACT J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc Vol 38, No 1, January, 1999 Validation of Geriatric Depression Scale, Korean VersionGDS in the Assessment of DSM-III-R Major Depression Maeng Je Cho, M.D., Jae Nam Bae, M.D., Guk Hee Suh, M.D., Bong Jin Hahm, M.D., Jang Kyu Kim, M.D., Dong Woo Lee, M.D., Min Hee Kang, M.D. Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul ObjectivesThe authors attempted to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the Korean version, Geriatric Depression ScaleGDS for screening geriatric DSM-III-R major depression among clinical populations. MethodsThrough of preliminary trials 3 times, the authors translated GDS including Short form Geriatric Depression ScaleSGDS into Korean. GDS, SGDS, HRS-D, CES-D was adminis-tered to 88 elderly psychiatric patients35 major depressives, 51 were non-major depression and also Diagnostic Interview ScheduleDIS-III-R was administered independently to diagnoses DSM-III-R major depression. Reliability and validity test 5, optimal cut-off point estimation, and ROC curve analysis were done to investigate the diagnostic validity of GDS and SGDS. ResultsInternal consistency-reliability and concurrent validity of GDS, SGDS associated with other depression scaleshrs-d, CES-D were excellent. Content validity and discriminant validity which differentiate DSM-III-R major depression from non-major depression was also good. The authors suggest the score 17as the optimal cut-off point of GDS for screening DSM-III-R major depression among clinical populations and the score 8as optimal cut-off score of SGDS. ROC curve analysis revealed wide AUC of both GDS and SGDS, which indicates its high diagnostic validity in assessing DSM-III-R major depression. The GDS and SGDS were found to be highly correlatedr0.9594 and any difference of AUC between both scales in ROC curve analysis were not found. This finding suggests that SGDS can be an adequate substitute for GDS. ConclusionThe GDS and SGDS are valid and reliable case finding tools for screening DSM-III- R major depression among clinical populations in Korea but relatively high cut-off point demands the further evaluation in the viewpoint of culturally determined style of response for the depression questionnaire in Korea. KEY WORDSGDS SGDS Major depression Elderly Diagnostic validity Optimal cut-off score. 62

부록 #1.? #2.? #3.? #4.? 5.? 6.? #7.? #8.? #9.? #10.? 11.? #12.? 13.? #14.? #15.? 16.? #17.? 18.? 19.? 20.? #21.? #22.? #23.? 24.? 25.? 26.? 27.? 28.? 29.? 30.? Note# indicates items of Short form GDSSGDS 63