184

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "184"

병길 시
6 years ago
Views:

1 KISEP Original Articles Korean J Child & Adol Psychiatr 8183~198 한국판청소년용도덕발달수준평가도구의개발 DEVELOPMENT OF THE KOREAN FORM OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT INVENTORY FOR ADOLESCENTS 신지용 * 조수철 ** Jee-Yong Shin, M.D.,* Soo-Churl Cho, M.D.** 요약 중심단어 서 론 Department of Neuropsychiatry, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Kangdong Sacred-Heart Hospital, Seoul Devision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Children s Hospital, Seoul 183

2 184

3 1. 연구대상 연구대상및방법 185

4 2. 연구방법 1) 검사도구의선정 2) 검사대상의선정 Table 1. Distribution of the main sample No. of survey No. of analysis% Male Female Male Female Middle school 1st year nd year rd year High school 1st year nd year rd year Total

5 3) 타당도평가 4) 신뢰도평가 5) 도덕발달수준의점수화과정 1. 타당도 1) 구인타당도 연구성적 187

6 Table 2. PM score# according to grades Grade No. Mean S.D. Scheffe testp0.05 Middle 1st * **** 2nd ** 3rd *** High 1st nd **** 3rd * ** *** Total F5,201=6.84, p=0.00 *, **, ***, ****:significant between the compared groups #:the score of principled morality Table 3. Concurrent validity Test Short-form Pearson Test * correlation Short-form 0.87* 1.00 Significance Test.00 two-tailed Short-form.00 Test No. Short-form *:Correlation is significant at the 0.01 leveltwotailed Table 4. Discriminant validity No. Mean F Significance Scheffe test Conduct * ** Psychiatric ** Normal * *, **:significant between the compared groups p0.05 2) 공존타당도 3) 변별타당도 Table 5. Story-total correalation Pearson correlation Total * 0.12* * * 0.16* 0.68* * * * * Total 0.58* 0.68* 0.56* 0.50* 1.00 *:Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level(two-tailed) Reliability coefficients 5 items Alpha=0.71 Standardized item alpha=0.68 Table 6. Pearson correlation coefficients of the scores between test and retest of this inventory by subgroups Normal group Conduct group Correlation No. r No. r Pearson p value <0.01 < 신뢰도 1) 이야기-전체상관성및내적일관성 2) 검사-재검사신뢰도 4. 청소년에서의도덕발달수준 188

7 고찰 189

8 결론 References 고재혁 (1986): 한국청소년의도덕성발달과그교육적함의. 서울대학교대학원남정현 (1986): 정신분열증환자들의도덕발달에대한연구. 조선대학교대학원남정현 김이영 김광일 (1987): 정신분열증및인격장애환자의도덕발달비교연구. 정신건강연구 6: 문영삼 (1988): 고등학생의도덕성발달수준과문제정의검사에의한측정치와의관계. 국민대학교대학원문용린 (1986): 인지발달론의관점에서본도덕성발달연구의문제와전망. 교육이론, 1:77 문용린 (1987): 청소년비행에대한관점의다양화. 교육개발 47:5-11 문인원 이만홍 이길홍 (1989): 의과대학생의도덕발달에대한연구. 신경정신의학 28: 박병희 장경준 신지용 (1996): 주제정의검사를사용한배행청소년의도덕발달에대한연구. 신경정신의학 35: 박종영 이종현 (1982): 학생들의도덕판단에관한연구. 한국심리학회지 3: 박춘자 (1988): 비행청소년과일반청소년의도덕성발달에관한연구. 단국대학교대학원신지용 김자성 장경준 (1995): 한국고등학생의도덕발달에대한연구. 신경정신의학 34: 이만홍 김준기 조은영 (1991): 의과대학생의도덕발달단계에대한연구 (II). 신경정신의학 30: 최정윤 (1979): 비행학생의도덕성발달-Kohlberg의도덕발달단계이론을중심으로. 고려대학교대학원 American Psychiatric Association(1994):Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed, Washington DC, American Psychiatric Press, pp85-91 Bandura A, McDonald FJ(1963):Influence of social reinforcement and the behavior of models in shaping children s moral judgments. J of Abnorm Soc Psychol 67: Gibbs JC, Arnold KD, Burkhart JE(1984):Sex differences in the expression of moral judgment. Child Dev 55: Gilligan C, Ward J, Taylor J(1988):Mapping the Moral Domain. Harvard University Press Hall C(1954):A Primer of Freudian Psychology. New York, Mentor Book 190

9 Hoffman ML(1975):Sex difference in moral internalization and values. J Personal Soc Psychol 32: Kohlberg L(1958):The Development of Modes of Moral Thinking and Choice in the Years Ten to Sixteen. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago Kohlberg L(1981):The Philosophy of Moral Development. Vol 1, San Francisco, Harper and Row Krebs D, Gillimore J(1982):The relationship among the first stage of cognitive development, roletaking abilities and moral development. Child Dev 53: Moon YL(1986b):A review of crosscultural studies on moral judgement development using the Defining Issues Test Muuss RE(1988):Carol Gilligan s theory of sex differences in the development of moral reasoning during adolescence. Adolescence 23: Park JY, Johnson RC(1984):Moral development in rural and urban Korea Piaget J(1962):The Moral Judgement of the Child. 3rd ed, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Rest JR(1974):Judging the important issues in moral dilemmas:an objective measure of development. Dev Psychol 10: Rest JR(1979):Revised Manual for the Defining Issues Test:An Objective Test of Moral Judgement Development. Minnesota Moral Research Projects, Minneapolis Rest JR(1986a):Moral Development:Advances in Theory and Research. Praeger Press. New York Rest JR(1986b):Manual for the Defining Issues Test. 3rd ed, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Self DJ, Olivarez M(1993):The influence of gender on conflicts of interest in the allocation of limited critical care resources:justice versus care. J Crit Care 8:64-74 Sharpe VA(1992):Justice and care:the implications of the Kohlberg-Gilligan debate for medical ethics. Theor Med 13: Walker LJ(1984):Sex difference in the development of moral reasoning:a critical review. Child Dev 55:

10 ABSTRACT Korean J Child & Adol Psychiatr 8183~198, 1997 DEVELOPMENT OF THE KOREAN FORM OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT INVENTORY FOR ADOLESCENTS Jee-Yong Shin, M.D., Soo-Churl Cho, M.D. Department of Neuropsychiatry, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Kangdong Sacred-Heart Hospital, Seoul ObjectsThis study was carried out to develop the Korean form of Moral Development Inventory for Adolescents designed to assess the principled morality in adolescents. And the auther also intended to find the demographic variables that influence the moral development. MethodsThe Korean form inventory was applied to 507 middle and high school adolescents, and retest was done in 42 second year middle school adolescents with 3 weeks interval. Together this inventory, short form of Rest moral development which had been proved its reliability and validity, were administered to the all subjects for concurrent validity. And then the author examined whether this inventory discriminates between conduct disorder patients, psychiatric controls and normal controls in the level of moral development. ResultsTest-retest reliability and internal consistency were very satisfactory. Concurrent validity with this inventory was also high level. And conduct disorder patients were scored significant lower than psychiatric and normal controls in the level of principled morality. The mean PM scores did not show significant difference according to the variables such as sex, birth order and religion. But there was significant difference according to the educational level of mother and places. ConclusionsThese results indicate that the Korean form of Moral Development Inventory is a reliable and valid rating inventory to assess the moral development level in Korean adolescents. KEY WORDSMoral development inventory Reliability Validity. 192

11 부록 사회문제에관한설문지 다음빈칸을채워주세요 193

12 194

13 Ⅰ. 남편과약 195

14 Ⅱ. 탈옥수 196

15 Ⅲ. 의사의갈등 197

16 Ⅳ. 직원고용 198

歯14.양돈규.hwp

歯14.양돈규.hwp : The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy 2003. Vol. 15, No. 3, 615-631. 1 2 3 1,410.,, ( ),., ( 69%),.,, ( ), ( ).,,.., ( ).,. :,,. :, (390-711) 21-1, : 043-649-1362 E-mail : ydk9498@hanmail.net