韓國開發硏究제 32 권제 2 호 ( 통권제 107 호 ) 지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 김희삼 ( 한국개발연구원부연구위원 ) Analysis on the Labor Market Performance of Local University Graduates and

Similar documents
大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

歯1.PDF

Á¶´öÈñ_0304_final.hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache


232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

<28BCF6BDC D B0E6B1E2B5B520C1F6BFAABAB020BFA9BCBAC0CFC0DAB8AE20C1A4C3A520C3DFC1F8C0FCB7AB5FC3D6C1BE E E687770>

歯4차학술대회원고(황수경이상호).PDF

<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>


< FB4EBB1B8BDC320BAB8B0C7BAB9C1F6C5EBB0E8BFACBAB820B9DFB0A320BFACB1B85FBEF6B1E2BAB92E687770>

서론

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

歯4차학술대회원고(장지연).PDF

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>



44-3대지.08류주현c

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H


hwp

<31342EBCBAC7FDBFB52E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

레이아웃 1

04_이근원_21~27.hwp


Vol.257 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

50-5대지05장후은.indd

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 95~118 학술 탄소은행제의가정용전력수요절감효과 분석 1) 2) 3) * ** *** 95

264 축되어 있으나, 과거의 경우 결측치가 있거나 폐기물 발생 량 집계방법이 용적기준에서 중량기준으로 변경되어 자료 를 활용하는데 제한이 있었다. 또한 1995년부터 쓰레기 종 량제가 도입되어 생활폐기물 발생량이 이를 기점으로 크 게 줄어들었다. 그러므로 1996년부

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

Vol.259 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M


조사연구 권 호 연구논문 한국노동패널조사자료의분석을위한패널가중치산출및사용방안사례연구 A Case Study on Construction and Use of Longitudinal Weights for Korea Labor Income Panel Survey 2)3) a

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

서론 34 2

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


에너지경제연구 제13권 제2호

... 수시연구 국가물류비산정및추이분석 Korean Macroeconomic Logistics Costs in 권혁구ㆍ서상범...

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

11¹ÚÇý·É

본문01

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

,......

03-서연옥.hwp

182 동북아역사논총 42호 금융정책이 조선에 어떤 영향을 미쳤는지를 살펴보고자 한다. 일제 대외금융 정책의 기본원칙은 각 식민지와 점령지마다 별도의 발권은행을 수립하여 일본 은행권이 아닌 각 지역 통화를 발행케 한 점에 있다. 이들 통화는 일본은행권 과 等 價 로 연

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

?? 1990년대 중반부터 일부 지방에서 자체적인 정책 혁신 을 통해 시도된 대학생촌관 정책은 그 효과에 비자발적 확산 + 대한 긍정적 평가에 힘입어 조금씩 다른 지역으로 수평적 확산이 이루어졌다. 이? + 지방 A 지방 B 비자발적 확산 중앙 중앙정부 정부 비자발적

歯kjmh2004v13n1.PDF

2 - ABSTRACT The object of this study is to investigate the practical effects of Senior Employment Project, implemented by government as a part of sen

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

13.11 ①초점

<31342DC0CCBFEBBDC42E687770>

이용석 박환용 - 베이비부머의 특성에 따른 주택유형 선택 변화 연구.hwp

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

°í¼®ÁÖ Ãâ·Â

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

1..

사단법인 커뮤니케이션디자인협회 시각디자인학회

2 I.서 론 학생들을 대상으로 강력사고가 해마다 발생하고 있다.범행 장소도 학교 안팎을 가리지 않는다.이제는 학교 안까지 침입하여 스스럼없이 범행을 하고 있는 현실 이 되었다.2008년 12월 11일 학교에 등교하고 있는 학생(여,8세)을 교회 안 화장 실로 납치하여

도비라

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

06-구인회

10송동수.hwp

①국문지리학회지-주성재-OK

09김정식.PDF


7 1 ( 12 ) ( 1912 ) 4. 3) ( ) 1 3 1, ) ( ), ( ),. 5) ( ) ). ( ). 6). ( ). ( ).

歯주5일본문.PDF

공연영상

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

00.앞부분2

7 1 ( 12 ) 1998.,. 5 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ). 4) ( )..,. 5) ( ).,, ( ) ( ). 6)., 2, ( )., ( ) ( ).

Vol.258 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

- 2 -


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend


06_À̼º»ó_0929

Transcription:

韓國開發硏究제 32 권제 2 호 ( 통권제 107 호 ) 지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 김희삼 ( 한국개발연구원부연구위원 ) Analysis on the Labor Market Performance of Local University Graduates and Regional Education Gap Hisam Kim (Associate Research Fellow, Korea Development Institute) * 본고는고영선편, 지역개발정책의방향과전략 ( 연구보고서 2008-03, 한국개발연구원, 2008. 12) 중제 8 장 ( 김희삼, 지방대학문제의분석과정책방향 ) 의일부내용을바탕으로작성한것임. ** 김희삼 : (e-mail) hisamkim@kdi.re.kr, (address) Korea Development Institute, 49 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea Key Word: (Local University), (Labor Market Performance), (SAT Score), (Regional Education Gap) JEL Code: I21, J24, J31 Received: 2010. 3. 26 Referee Process Started: 2010. 3. 30 Referee Reports Completed: 2010. 6. 18

ABSTRACT In terms of labor market accomplishments, such as income, size of the company, and the matching quality between one s job and college major (specialization), a very large discrepancy is observed between the graduates from colleges located in Seoul and those outside Seoul. But, when the department average score of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) at the time of college entrance is controlled for, the discrepancy is found to be reduced to a considerable degree. In the case of wage gap, at least two third can be explained by the SAT score gap. The remaining wage gap seems to reflect the characteristics of workplace. In other words, graduates with high SAT scores enter colleges located in Seoul and thus tend to find better jobs leading to earning differences. This result that confirms the importance of aptitude test scores suggests that in the labor market, one of the major reasons behind a lower accomplishment of the graduate from local colleges is due to a lower competitiveness of local colleges in attracting the brightest students. But, this should not be viewed as only an internal problem of local colleges. This is because the growth of local economies tends to haul the advancement of local colleges in that area rather than being the other way around. The agglomeration effect in Seoul where headquarters of large corporations and financial institutions gather is the factor that has elevated the status of colleges located in Seoul since this provides highly preferred job choices of graduates. When the competitiveness of college is significantly influenced by exogenous factors, such as the vicinity to Seoul, the effort being made by colleges alone would not be enough to improve the situation. However, the central government, too, is not in the position to carry out countermeasure policies for such problems. The regional development strategy boosted through supportive policies for local colleges, such as financial support, is not based on the persuasive and empirical grounds. It is true that college education is universal and that the government 's intervention in assisting local colleges to secure basic conditions, such as tenure faculty and adequate facilities is necessary. However, the way of intervention should not be a support-only type. In order to improve the efficiency and effect of financial support, restructuring programs, including the merger and integration of insolvent colleges, should be underway prior to providing support. In addition, when the policy is focused on education recipients local college students, and not on education providers local colleges, the importance of regional gap in compulsory education (elementary and junior high schools) turns out to be much important as the gap between metropolitan area colleges and local colleges. Considering the educational gap before college entrance shown from the discrepancies of aptitude test scores among different regions, the

ABSTRACT imbalance between regions in terms of human resources is apparently derived from compulsory education, and not from college education. Therefore, there is a need to double the policy efforts to reduce the educational gap among different regions. In addition, given the current situation where it is difficult to find appropriate ex post facto policy measures to solve the problem of income gap between the graduates from metropolitan colleges and local colleges, it can be said that improving the environment for compulsory education in local areas is a growing necessity for bridging the educational gap among different regions.

58 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ Ⅰ. 서론,.,..,,.,.,,., 16. 4.,.,,...,..

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 59 Ⅱ. 선행연구와분석자료 1. 지방대졸업생의노동시장성과에관한선행연구 2000... (Youth Panel), ( ) 2001 15~29 8,296., 1,000. ( ) 2002 2 14,026 (4 7,543, 6,483 ) 2003 12. 2005 (2003 4 13,320, 12,721 ).., 1 2 (2003) 13%. (2005) 2,,. 1 4 (2005) 4.,.,

60 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ, (2005) 2003,,,. (2007) 2005. 2005 (2007) 11.5%..,.., (2007) (2007). (2007), 4.. (, ). 2. 분석자료 가. 대졸자직업이동경로조사 (GOMS) 2006 (Graduates Occupational Mobility Survey, GOMS). GOMS 2004 8 2005 2 4,. ( ) 2005 2005 502,764. (158 ), 4 (173 ), (11

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 61 ) 3 342. GOMS 150 5% (multi-stage stratified sampling). 2008 3 26,544. GOMS (, 14,,, ).,,. (cohort),.,,., GOMS 22. 나. GOMS 표본의기초통계 <Table 1> GOMS.,.. 46.4%. 1990 2003 1994, 2005 2. 85%, 4 60%, 38%, 2.5%. 1). 1) GOMS 5% 10% (over-sampling).

62 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ <Table 1> Descriptive Statistics of the GOMS College Graduates Sample(n=26,544) Year of college entrance and graduation Percent College categories and majors Percent Entrance before 1994 0.1 Branch 5.3 Entrance in 1994 0.1 National institution 13.2 Entrance in 1995 0.4 Public institution 1.9 Entrance in 1996 1.8 Private institution 84.9 Entrance in 1997 8.4 4-year university 59.9 Entrance in 1998 14.2 University of education 2.5 Entrance in 1999 8.2 2-year junior college 37.6 Entrance in 2000 18.4 Humanities major 9.6 Entrance in 2001 18.2 Social sciences major 24.7 Entrance in 2002 8.6 Education major 7.4 Entrance in 2003 21.4 Engineering major 30.7 Entrance in 2004 0.1 Natural sciences major 11.3 Graduation in August 2004 9.7 Medical and pharmacy major 5.9 Graduation in February 2005 90.3 Arts and physical major 10.4 다. 학과별취업률및평균수능점수 GOMS. 2), GOMS 2005 ( ) (2005 4 1 ).,.,. 1994 ( ) 2003 2) GOMS,.

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 63 ( ). 3). Ⅲ. 대졸자의노동시장성과에대한지역적요인의영향,,.... 1. 임금 (Mincer[1970])., (,,,,,, ) (,,,,,,,,,, ). 가. 대졸취업자의출신대학지역별임금격차. <Table 2> (1) 3).

64 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ 15.3%. (, ),., ( [2007] 11.5%).,, ( 2 ).,,.,,,,, 4),,.,. ( ). <Table 2> (2) 15., 20%, 10%, 10%, 6%, 5%. 5) 4) 0.563. 1,957 653.,. 5),, 2006 1 (GRDP) 4 154.

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 65 <Table 2> College Graduates Wage Gaps by Region of College Dependent variable: ln(monthly average wage) (1) (2) Coefficient Std. dev. Coefficient Std. dev. Intercept -17.79616 2.0769 *** -19.61321 2.0814 *** College outside Seoul -0.1530 0.0082 *** Busan -0.1639 0.0138 *** Daegu -0.1552 0.0169 *** Daejeon -0.1580 0.0174 *** Incheon -0.0631 0.0183 *** Gwangju -0.1859 0.0158 *** Ulsan -0.0479 0.0254 * Gyeonggi -0.1024 0.0109 *** Gangwon -0.2178 0.0187 *** Chungbuk -0.1431 0.0172 *** Chungnam -0.1702 0.0156 *** Jeonbuk -0.2524 0.0190 *** Jeonnam -0.2283 0.0195 *** Gyeongbuk -0.1669 0.0131 *** Gyeongnam -0.1780 0.0180 *** Jeju -0.2928 0.0276 *** Branch 0.0541 0.0190 *** 0.0460 0.0193 ** Private institution -0.0667 0.0105 *** -0.0856 0.0112 *** College of education 0.2846 0.0241 *** 0.2600 0.0244 *** Junior college -0.1316 0.0103 *** -0.1417 0.0105 *** Employment rate of the department 0.1012 0.0192 *** 0.0883 0.0196 *** Major (omitted: Arts & Physical) Humanities 0.0451 0.0144 *** 0.0476 0.0144 *** Social sciences 0.1409 0.0118 *** 0.1467 0.0118 *** Education 0.1270 0.0174 *** 0.1340 0.0174 ***

66 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ <Table 2> Continued Dependent variable: ln(monthly average wage) (1) (2) Coefficient Std. dev. Coefficient Std. dev. Engineering 0.1665 0.0119 *** 0.1667 0.0119 *** Natural science 0.0497 0.0143 *** 0.0541 0.0143 *** Medical and pharmacy 0.2800 0.0165 *** 0.2995 0.0166 *** GPA 0.0327 0.0043 *** 0.0330 0.0043 *** Number of licences 0.0036 0.0019 * 0.0052 0.0019 *** Weekly working hours 0.0108 0.0002 *** 0.0109 0.0002 *** Months of experience 0.0055 0.0002 *** 0.0055 0.0002 *** Months of experience squared 0.0000 0.0000 *** 0.0000 0.0000 *** Age 0.0113 0.0011 *** 0.0123 0.0011 *** Female -0.1070 0.0095 *** -0.1051 0.0095 *** Married 0.0653 0.0123 *** 0.0642 0.0122 *** Living with parents -0.0101 0.0107-0.0176 0.0107 * Household head 0.0861 0.0105 *** 0.0843 0.0104 *** Number of household members 0.0002 0.0031 0.0006 0.0031 Mother's years of schooling 0.0038 0.0011 *** 0.0032 0.0011 *** Family income at the time of college entrance (omitted: under 1 million won) 1 million - 2 million won 0.0408 0.0156 *** 0.0376 0.0155 ** 2 million - 3 million won 0.0882 0.0150 *** 0.0809 0.0150 *** 3 million - 4 million won 0.1302 0.0158 *** 0.1204 0.0158 *** 4 million - 5 million won 0.1490 0.0167 *** 0.1387 0.0167 *** 5 million - 10 million won 0.1719 0.0177 *** 0.1654 0.0176 *** 10 million won and over 0.2102 0.0252 *** 0.2027 0.0251 *** Number of observations 17,046 17,046 Adjusted R 2 0.358 0.365 F ratio 239.0*** 182.1***

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 67 나. 수능점수를고려했을때출신대학교지역이임금에미치는효과,. 1990 6),., 1994 2003 ( [2007], p.51)... 1994 96 200, 1997 400,. (=100 ). 4. 4 <Table 3> 8,215. <Table 3> (1). 16.4%. (2) 5.2% 6) ( ) 1980 32.8%, 1990 33.2% 1995 51.4% 1996 1997 60.1%, 2001 70.5%, 2007 82.8% OECD (2005 66.7%, 47.3%).

68 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ <Table 3> SAT Scores - Good Predictor of Wage Gaps by Region of University (1) (2) Dependent variable: Not controling for SAT scores Controling for SAT scores ln(monthly average wage) Coefficient Std. dev. Coefficient Std. dev. Intercept -35.863 5.476 *** -35.489 5.408 *** University outside Seoul -0.164 0.011 *** -0.052 0.014 *** Branch 0.054 0.022 ** -0.034 0.022 Private institution -0.068 0.013 *** -0.017 0.014 College of education 0.188 0.031 *** 0.155 0.031 *** Employment rate of the department 0.139 0.028 *** 0.112 0.028 *** Major (omitted: arts & physical) Humanities 0.052 0.023 ** -0.092 0.024 *** Social sciences 0.166 0.021 *** 0.004 0.024 Education 0.220 0.027 *** 0.016 0.030 Engineering 0.196 0.021 *** 0.029 0.024 Natural science 0.032 0.023-0.100 0.025 *** Medical and pharmacy 0.222 0.031 *** -0.013 0.034 GPA 0.036 0.006 *** 0.034 0.006 *** Number of licences 0.006 0.003 * 0.010 0.003 *** Weekly working hours 0.014 0.000 *** 0.014 0.000 *** Months of experience 0.006 0.001 *** 0.006 0.001 *** Months of experience squared 0.000 0.000 *** 0.000 0.000 *** Age 0.021 0.003 *** 0.020 0.003 *** Female 0.004 0.017-0.004 0.017 Married 0.042 0.018 ** 0.046 0.018 *** Living with parents -0.001 0.016 0.002 0.016 Household head 0.088 0.016 *** 0.087 0.016 *** Number of household members 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 Mother's years of schooling 0.005 0.002 *** 0.004 0.002 ** Family income at the time of college entrance (omitted: under 1 million won) 1 million - 2 million won 0.009 0.025 0.006 0.025 2 million - 3 million won 0.049 0.024 ** 0.047 0.023 ** 3 million - 4 million won 0.080 0.025 *** 0.074 0.024 *** 4 million - 5 million won 0.079 0.026 *** 0.073 0.025 *** 5 million - 10 million won 0.101 0.027 *** 0.099 0.026 *** 10 million won and over 0.117 0.037 *** 0.113 0.036 *** Department average SAT percentile score 0.006 0.000 *** Number of observations 8,215 8,215 Adjusted R 2 0.341 0.358 F ratio 110.0*** 115.3***

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 69, 3 2. 7), 10 6%. 8).,,,,,,.,.. 9) 다. 수능점수와직장특성을고려했을때출신대학교지역이임금에미치는효과. (16 ), ( ),, ( ), 4 ( / ), ( / ),. 7),., 14.9%, 6.0%. ( ). 8) (2007) 10 5%. 9) 7,642 <Table 3>. ( ) -0.162(0.012), -0.043(0.014). <Table 3> (0.683=(0.164-0.052)/0.164) (0.735=(0.162-0.043)/ 0.162),.

70 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ. (endogeneity) (,, ) (specification). <Table 4>. <Table 4> 5,689. <Table 4> (1), (2). (1) 8.7%.,,., 1,000,,,. (2). 10),. 22. 11) 10) ( 5,310 ) <Table 4>. ( ) -0.080(0.014), -0.0007(0.017),. 11) 2007 10 441, 94.3% 54.6%, 63.9%, (, 914, 2007. 11. 27).

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 71 <Table 4> Wage Gaps by Region of University Conditioned on Job Characteristics Dependent variable: (1) Not controling for SAT scores (2) Controling for SAT scores ln(monthly average wage) Coefficient Std. dev. Coefficient Std. dev. Intercept -40.5170 5.7684 *** -40.3611 5.7311 *** University outside Seoul -0.0873 0.0142 *** -0.0145 0.0165 Branch 0.0506 0.0249 ** -0.0114 0.0258 Private institution -0.0387 0.0155 ** -0.0013 0.0160 College of education 0.0538 0.0348 0.0333 0.0346 Employment rate of the department 0.0865 0.0315 *** 0.0737 0.0314 ** Major (omitted: Arts & Physical) Humanities -0.0802 0.0259 *** -0.1807 0.0282 *** Social sciences -0.0397 0.0243-0.1524 0.0275 *** Education 0.0315 0.0313-0.1122 0.0353 *** Engineering -0.0348 0.0246-0.1510 0.0279 *** Natural science -0.1186 0.0266 *** -0.2123 0.0286 *** Medical and pharmacy 0.1060 0.0361 *** -0.0592 0.0407 GPA 0.0202 0.0072 *** 0.0199 0.0071 *** Number of licences -0.0055 0.0038-0.0026 0.0038 Weekly working hours 0.0094 0.0004 *** 0.0094 0.0004 *** Months of experience 0.0040 0.0006 *** 0.0041 0.0006 *** Months of experience squared 0.0000 0.0000 *** 0.0000 0.0000 *** Age 0.0231 0.0030 *** 0.0228 0.0030 *** Female 0.0222 0.0189 0.0160 0.0188 Married 0.0451 0.0194 ** 0.0472 0.0193 ** Living with parents 0.0120 0.0182 0.0144 0.0180 Household head 0.0639 0.0176 *** 0.0662 0.0175 *** Number of household members 0.0040 0.0050 0.0049 0.0050 Mother's years of schooling 0.0032 0.0018 * 0.0023 0.0018 Family income at the time of college entrance (omitted: under 1 million won) 1 million - 2 million won 0.0528 0.0272 * 0.0518 0.0271 * 2 million - 3 million won 0.0649 0.0259 ** 0.0642 0.0258 ** 3 million - 4 million won 0.1057 0.0269 *** 0.1029 0.0268 *** 4 million - 5 million won 0.1023 0.0281 *** 0.0984 0.0279 *** 5 million - 10 million won 0.1366 0.0294 *** 0.1331 0.0292 *** 10 million won and over 0.1481 0.0412 *** 0.1474 0.0410 *** Department average SAT percentile score 0.0042 0.0005 ***

72 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ <Table 4> Continue (1) (2) Dependent variable: Not controling for SAT scores Controling for SAT scores ln(monthly average wage) Coefficient Std. dev. Coefficient Std. dev. Region of job (omitted: Seoul) Busan -0.0489 0.0261 * -0.0551 0.0259 ** Daegu -0.0113 0.0279-0.0264 0.0278 Daejeon -0.0613 0.0288 ** -0.0601 0.0286 ** Incheon 0.0055 0.0311-0.0017 0.0310 Gwangju -0.0678 0.0294 ** -0.0557 0.0292 * Ulsan 0.0320 0.0341 0.0296 0.0339 Gyeonggi 0.0041 0.0160 0.0097 0.0159 Gangwon -0.1444 0.0384 *** -0.1335 0.0382 *** Chungbuk -0.0398 0.0344-0.0304 0.0342 Chungnam -0.0363 0.0283-0.0224 0.0281 Jeonbuk -0.0627 0.0336 * -0.0216 0.0338 Jeonnam -0.0401 0.0367-0.0102 0.0366 Gyeongbuk -0.0555 0.0281 ** -0.0619 0.0279 ** Gyeongnam 0.0035 0.0244 0.0078 0.0242 Jeju -0.1820 0.0663 *** -0.1333 0.0661 ** Regular employee 0.1663 0.0181 *** 0.1694 0.0179 *** Union member 0.1066 0.0158 *** 0.1005 0.0157 *** Firm size (omitted: 4 persons or under) 5-9 persons -0.0407 0.0244 * -0.0338 0.0242 10-29 persons 0.0116 0.0222 0.0127 0.0221 30-49 persons 0.0228 0.0255 0.0241 0.0254 50-99 persons 0.0241 0.0244 0.0257 0.0242 100-299 persons 0.0581 0.0248 ** 0.0598 0.0247 ** 300-499 persons 0.0528 0.0302 * 0.0524 0.0301 * 500-999 persons 0.0370 0.0272 0.0343 0.0270 1000 persons or over 0.1199 0.0241 *** 0.1093 0.0239 *** Social insurance provided by job National or occupational pension 0.1425 0.0454 *** 0.1340 0.0451 *** Health insurance 0.1360 0.0461 *** 0.1433 0.0458 *** Employment insurance 0.0069 0.0458 0.0017 0.0455 Industrial accident compensation insurance -0.0182 0.0444-0.0102 0.0442 Benefits provided by job Severance pay -0.0570 0.0225 ** -0.0569 0.0223 ** Overtime pay 0.0501 0.0145 *** 0.0468 0.0144 *** Bonus 0.1032 0.0196 *** 0.1001 0.0195 *** Annual/monthly paid vacation 0.0848 0.0206 *** 0.0849 0.0205 *** Paid maternity leave 0.0253 0.0141 * 0.0225 0.0140 Paid sick leave 0.0375 0.0185 ** 0.0324 0.0184 * Number of observations 5,689 5,689 Adjusted R 2 0.521 0.527 F ratio 84.6*** 85.6***

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 73 라. 출신대학교지역이임금에미치는효과의임금분위별추정 (quantile regression model).,, ( ),. (OLS) 0, 0.,. arg. 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9. 5 <Table 5>. 100 (bootstrapping)., 10%( ), 25%( ), 50%( ), 75%( ), 90% ( ) 5.1%, 5.0%, 5.1%, 5.4%., 5%, 5.2%,

74 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ Dependent variable: ln (monthly average wage) (1) 10% (2) 25% (3) 50% (4) 75% (5) 90% Coeff Std. dev. Coeff Std. dev. Coeff Std. dev. Coeff Std. dev. Coeff Std. dev. Intercept 2.188 (0.429) *** 2.612 (0.305) *** 3.037 (0.171) *** 3.481 (0.174) *** 3.632 (0.219) *** University outside Seoul -0.044 (0.028) -0.051 (0.014) *** -0.050 (0.010) *** -0.051 (0.014) *** -0.054 (0.013) *** Branch -0.072 (0.062) -0.042 (0.025) * -0.036 (0.017) ** -0.035 (0.023) -0.045 (0.022) ** Private institution -0.006 (0.030) -0.011 (0.018) -0.028 (0.013) ** -0.018 (0.012) -0.018 (0.014) College of education 0.451 (0.060) *** 0.186 (0.038) *** 0.048 (0.020) ** 0.009 (0.019) -0.048 (0.026) * Employment rate of the department 0.139 (0.075) * 0.131 (0.033) *** 0.138 (0.022) *** 0.094 (0.025) *** 0.124 (0.031) *** Major (omitted: Arts & Physical) Humanities -0.096 (0.051) * -0.060 (0.032) * -0.058 (0.026) ** -0.079 (0.027) *** -0.099 (0.047) ** Social sciences 0.025 (0.047) 0.050 (0.028) * 0.031 (0.024) -0.006 (0.026) -0.054 (0.045) Education 0.016 (0.064) 0.095 (0.038) ** 0.062 (0.028) ** -0.012 (0.032) -0.096 (0.047) ** Engineering 0.065 (0.048) 0.086 (0.030) *** 0.066 (0.026) ** 0.023 (0.028) -0.047 (0.044) Natural science -0.176 (0.062) *** -0.076 (0.035) ** -0.041 (0.029) -0.068 (0.029) ** -0.122 (0.043) *** Medical and pharmacy -0.320 (0.149) ** -0.044 (0.043) -0.039 (0.041) 0.043 (0.039) 0.082 (0.058) GPA 0.005 (0.013) 0.039 (0.007) *** 0.042 (0.005) *** 0.037 (0.006) *** 0.033 (0.006) *** Number of licences 0.020 (0.007) *** 0.012 (0.004) *** 0.007 (0.003) ** 0.005 (0.003) 0.005 (0.004) Weekly working hours 0.018 (0.001) *** 0.014 (0.001) *** 0.009 (0.001) *** 0.006 (0.001) *** 0.005 (0.001) *** Months of experience 0.008 (0.002) *** 0.007 (0.001) *** 0.005 (0.001) *** 0.004 (0.001) *** 0.005 (0.001) *** Months of experience squared 0.000 (0.000) * 0.000 (0.000) ** 0.000 (0.000) *** 0.000 (0.000) ** 0.000 (0.000) *** Age 0.009 (0.005) * 0.015 (0.003) *** 0.020 (0.003) *** 0.023 (0.003) *** 0.031 (0.006) *** Female 0.030 (0.031) -0.040 (0.016) ** -0.054 (0.015) *** -0.058 (0.013) *** -0.040 (0.023) * Married 0.089 (0.032) *** 0.031 (0.018) * 0.011 (0.015) 0.028 (0.015) * 0.023 (0.019) Living with parents 0.010 (0.033) 0.022 (0.020) -0.021 (0.013) -0.018 (0.013) -0.011 (0.017) Household head 0.097 (0.030) *** 0.103 (0.021) *** 0.062 (0.013) *** 0.038 (0.013) *** 0.026 (0.015) * Number of household members 0.003 (0.009) -0.001 (0.005) 0.008 (0.003) ** 0.003 (0.004) -0.001 (0.005) Mother's years of schooling 0.002 (0.004) 0.002 (0.002) 0.004 (0.002) ** 0.005 (0.002) *** 0.004 (0.002) *** Family income at the time of college entrance (omitted: under 1 million won) 1 million - 2 million won 0.050 (0.079) 0.003 (0.033) -0.023 (0.025) -0.038 (0.021) * -0.029 (0.041) 2 million - 3 million won 0.099 (0.079) 0.046 (0.035) 0.013 (0.023) -0.018 (0.018) -0.007 (0.038) 3 million - 4 million won 0.111 (0.086) 0.063 (0.035) * 0.037 (0.023) 0.014 (0.020) 0.038 (0.039) 4 million - 5 million won 0.103 (0.083) 0.062 (0.035) * 0.052 (0.023) ** 0.012 (0.022) 0.021 (0.040) 5 million - 10 million won 0.112 (0.081) 0.097 (0.036) *** 0.073 (0.023) *** 0.039 (0.025) 0.044 (0.041) 10 million won and over 0.136 (0.096) 0.066 (0.047) 0.052 (0.033) 0.049 (0.034) 0.093 (0.056) Department average SAT percentile score 0.006 (0.001) *** 0.007 (0.000) *** 0.007 (0.000) *** 0.007 (0.000) *** 0.006 (0.000) *** Number of observations 8,215 8,215 8,215 8,215 8,215 Pseudo R 2 0.260 0.254 0.232 0.209 0.189 <Table 5> Quantile Regression Result of Wage Gaps by Region of University

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 75. 12),. 10% 50%,. 10%,,., 10 6 7%. 2. 사업체규모.,,.,. 가. 대졸취업자의출신대학지역별사업체규모 9 ( ). 1 4 (13.1%), 5 9 (11.8%), 10 29 (18.7%), 30 49 (9.4%), 50 99 (11.5%), 100 299 (11.7%), 300 499 (5.0%), 500 999 (5.9%), 1,000 (13.0%). 1 9 (ordered logistic regression model) <Table 6>. (1) (-0.651), 12) (2007) 2.5 4.0%.,.

76 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ <Table 6> College Graduates Firm Size by Region of College Dependent variable: firm size (9 categories) (1) (2) (Ordered logit model) Coefficient Std. dev. Coefficient Std. dev. College outside Seoul -0.6515 0.0348 *** Busan -0.5343 0.0585 *** Daegu -0.5988 0.0708 *** Daejeon -0.7394 0.0748 *** Incheon -0.2597 0.0766 *** Gwangju -0.7215 0.0668 *** Ulsan -0.1097 0.1080 Gyeonggi -0.6221 0.0463 *** Gangwon -0.9282 0.0768 *** Chungbuk -0.6236 0.0715 *** Chungnam -0.7442 0.0648 *** Jeonbuk -1.0392 0.0802 *** Jeonnam -1.0419 0.0830 *** Gyeongbuk -0.6442 0.0554 *** Gyeongnam -0.6542 0.0750 *** Jeju -1.1924 0.1180 *** Branch 0.2827 0.0795 *** 0.3177 0.0811 *** Private institution -0.2701 0.0445 *** -0.3322 0.0477 *** College of education 0.2285 0.0913 ** 0.1360 0.0936 Junior college -0.4032 0.0434 *** -0.4051 0.0444 *** Employment rate of the department 0.4079 0.0814 *** 0.3299 0.0837 *** Major (omitted: arts & physical) Humanities 0.6997 0.0625 *** 0.7005 0.0628 *** Social sciences 1.0354 0.0514 *** 1.0473 0.0518 *** Education 0.5264 0.0705 *** 0.5376 0.0710 *** Engineering 1.3649 0.0522 *** 1.3642 0.0525 *** Natural science 0.8772 0.0618 *** 0.8907 0.0622 *** Medical and pharmacy 1.6444 0.0725 *** 1.7035 0.0734 *** GPA (omitted: lowest) Lower 0.3631 0.1946 * 0.3828 0.1939 ** Median 0.5051 0.1832 *** 0.5181 0.1824 *** Higher 0.6467 0.1834 *** 0.6650 0.1827 *** Highest 0.7213 0.1869 *** 0.7383 0.1862 *** Number of licences 0.0020 0.0081 0.0069 0.0081 Age -0.0209 0.0040 *** -0.0171 0.0040 *** Female -0.1558 0.0397 *** -0.1523 0.0397 *** Married -0.1116 0.0513 ** -0.1189 0.0513 ** Living with parents -0.3086 0.0447 *** -0.3318 0.0448 *** Household head 0.1848 0.0438 *** 0.1803 0.0439 *** Number of household members 0.0289 0.0127 ** 0.0330 0.0127 *** Mother's years of schooling 0.0218 0.0045 *** 0.0199 0.0045 *** Family income at the time of college entrance (omitted: under 1 million won) 1 million - 2 million won 0.0876 0.0653 0.0680 0.0653 2 million - 3 million won 0.2297 0.0631 *** 0.2015 0.0632 *** 3 million - 4 million won 0.2498 0.0665 *** 0.2120 0.0666 *** 4 million - 5 million won 0.1592 0.0702 ** 0.1272 0.0703 * 5 million - 10 million won 0.1621 0.0742 ** 0.1454 0.0743 ** 10 million won and over 0.2304 0.1072 ** 0.2098 0.1074 * Number of observations 17,710 17,710 Log likelihood 2,611.5 2,770.3 Pseudo R 2 0.035 0.037

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 77 (, odds ratio) 0.521(=exp(-0.651)). <Table 6> (2) 15..,.,,. 나. 수능점수를고려했을때출신대학교지역이사업체규모에미치는효과 <Table 7> 4. (1). 0.494 (=exp(-0.705)). (2) 0.763(=exp(-0.270)). 13) 9 (parallel regression assumption). (proportional odds test Brant test), ( 13) (7,924 ) <Table 7>, ( ) -0.7371(0.0481), -0.2836(0.0577) <Table 7>.

78 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ <Table 7> SAT Scores - Good Predictor of Firm Size by Region of University Dependent variable: firm size (9 categories) (1) (2) (Ordered logit model) Coefficient Std. dev. Coefficient Std. dev. College outside Seoul -0.7049 0.0463 *** -0.2697 0.0554 *** Branch 0.3065 0.0882 *** -0.0392 0.0916 Private institution -0.2016 0.0549 *** -0.0027 0.0567 College of education 0.0775 0.1156-0.0383 0.1155 Employment rate of the department 0.4781 0.1138 *** 0.3627 0.1141 *** Major (omitted: arts & physical) Humanities 0.6885 0.0950 *** 0.1050 0.1035 Social sciences 1.0530 0.0882 *** 0.4053 0.0991 *** Education 0.7920 0.1097 *** -0.0537 0.1245 Engineering 1.6711 0.0888 *** 1.0179 0.0997 *** Natural science 0.8760 0.0983 *** 0.3448 0.1052 *** Medical and pharmacy 1.3542 0.1336 *** 0.4252 0.1487 *** GPA (omitted: lowest) Lower 0.5210 0.2825 * 0.4876 0.2817 * Median 0.5432 0.2668 ** 0.5465 0.2657 ** Higher 0.7605 0.2670 *** 0.7424 0.2660 *** Highest 0.9733 0.2728 *** 0.9642 0.2717 *** Number of licences -0.0075 0.0141 0.0057 0.0141 Age -0.0505 0.0111 *** -0.0475 0.0112 *** Female -0.1572 0.0685 ** -0.1896 0.0688 *** Married -0.1617 0.0739 ** -0.1448 0.0740 ** Living with parents -0.2949 0.0664 *** -0.2842 0.0663 *** Household head 0.1750 0.0654 *** 0.1781 0.0654 *** Number of household members 0.0323 0.0187 * 0.0377 0.0186 ** Mother's years of schooling 0.0292 0.0066 *** 0.0230 0.0066 *** Family income at the time of college entrance (omitted: under 1 million won) 1 million - 2 million won -0.1645 0.1008-0.1741 0.1008 * 2 million - 3 million won -0.0592 0.0967-0.0623 0.0966 3 million - 4 million won 0.0068 0.1005-0.0130 0.1004 4 million - 5 million won -0.1690 0.1050-0.1910 0.1049 * 5 million - 10 million won -0.0278 0.1091-0.0330 0.1091 10 million won and over 0.2047 0.1516 0.1935 0.1518 Department average SAT percentile score 0.0250 0.0018 *** Number of observations 8,523 8,523 Log likelihood 1,417.1 1,618.8 Pseudo R 2 0.039 0.044

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 79 <Table 8> The Odds Ratio of Local University Graduates Getting Jobs by Firm Size Firm size 5 persons 10 persons 30 persons 50 persons 100 persons 300 persons 500 persons 1,000 persons (1) Not controling for SAT score 0.727 0.615 0.569 0.520 0.517 0.469 0.439 0.384 (2) Controling for SAT score 1.047 0.852 0.820 0.747 0.762 0.758 0.751 0.767 =3,777.4). 14) <Table 8>.. <Table 7>. (1), 5 0.727, 1,000 0.384. 5, 1,000. (2)., 5 5 ( 1.047 1 ). 10 30 50 0.8 0.7, (1). 14) 9. 2~3 (multinomial logit).

80 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ. 3. 전공일치도. ( )?, (26.4%), (45.0%), (28.6%). 1, 2, 3. 가. 대졸취업자의출신대학지역별전공일치도 <Table 9>. (1) ( ) 0.863(=exp(-0.148))., ( =257.2). ( ) ( ) ( ) (A) (B). (A) 0.769, (B) 0.941.,,. (2),,. ( [2008]),

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 81 <Table 9> College Major and Job Matching Quality by Region of College Dependent variable: college major and job matching quality (3 categories) (Ordered logit model) (1) (2) Coefficient Std. dev. Coefficient Std. dev. College outside Seoul -0.1478 0.0371 *** Busan -0.2559 0.0629 *** Daegu -0.0437 0.0778 Daejeon -0.2394 0.0798 *** Incheon -0.1388 0.0831 * Gwangju -0.3353 0.0719 *** Ulsan -0.4130 0.1166 *** Gyeonggi 0.1202 0.0497 ** Gangwon -0.3666 0.0844 *** Chungbuk -0.1709 0.0785 ** Chungnam -0.0483 0.0716 Jeonbuk -0.3433 0.0883 *** Jeonnam -0.0976 0.0895 Gyeongbuk -0.2102 0.0595 *** Gyeongnam -0.4070 0.0833 *** Jeju 0.0508 0.1282 Branch 0.0551 0.0838-0.0458 0.0856 Private institution -0.0179 0.0474-0.0778 0.0508 College of education -0.0508 0.1147-0.0941 0.1170 Junior college -0.6306 0.0468 *** -0.6966 0.0480 *** Employment rate of the department 0.3538 0.0870 *** 0.3630 0.0894 *** Major (omitted: arts & physical) Humanities -0.7982 0.0663 *** -0.7728 0.0666 *** Social sciences -0.5700 0.0534 *** -0.5411 0.0536 *** Education 1.0306 0.0823 *** 1.0792 0.0828 *** Engineering -0.2954 0.0540 *** -0.2711 0.0543 *** Natural science -0.5964 0.0653 *** -0.5638 0.0657 *** Medical and pharmacy 1.0402 0.0763 *** 1.1254 0.0774 ***

82 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ <Table 9> Continued Dependent variable: college major and job matching quality (3 categories) (Ordered logit model) GPA (omitted: lowest) (1) (2) Coefficient Std. dev. Coefficient Std. dev. Lower 0.1683 0.2114 0.1813 0.2115 Median 0.4505 0.1994 ** 0.4618 0.1995 ** Higher 0.7883 0.1997 *** 0.7964 0.1998 *** Highest 0.9685 0.2035 *** 0.9852 0.2036 *** Number of licences 0.0220 0.0086 ** 0.0261 0.0088 *** Age 0.0201 0.0042 *** 0.0221 0.0043 *** Female 0.0268 0.0429 0.0348 0.0430 Married 0.0143 0.0551 0.0143 0.0552 Living with parents -0.1398 0.0483 *** -0.1553 0.0485 *** Household head 0.0975 0.0474 ** 0.0999 0.0475 ** Number of household members 0.0230 0.0139 * 0.0204 0.0139 Mother's years of schooling 0.0114 0.0049 ** 0.0101 0.0049 ** Family income at the time of college entrance (omitted: under 1 million won) 1 million - 2 million won 0.0414 0.0704 0.0416 0.0706 2 million - 3 million won 0.0056 0.0680-0.0050 0.0682 3 million - 4 million won 0.0367 0.0718 0.0308 0.0721 4 million - 5 million won 0.0099 0.0757-0.0082 0.0759 5 million - 10 million won 0.0474 0.0799 0.0308 0.0801 10 million won and over -0.0643 0.1149-0.0877 0.1152 Number of observations 17,733 17,733 Log likelihood 2,335.9 2,438.7 Pseudo R 2 0.062 0.064.,. 4

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 83., 2..,. (school to work).,. 나. 수능점수를고려했을때출신대학교지역이전공일치도에미치는효과 <Table 10> 4. (1), 0.880 (=exp(-0.128)), 4. (2),. 15). 15) 1.015(=exp(0.015)),.

84 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ <Table 10> SAT Scores - Good Predictor of Major-Job Matching by Region of University Dependent variable: university major and job matching quality (3 categories) (1) (2) (Ordered logit model) Coefficient Std. dev. Coefficient Std. dev. College outside Seoul -0.1277 0.0494 ** 0.0146 0.0606 Branch 0.0188 0.0944-0.0920 0.0983 Private institution 0.0204 0.0590 0.0818 0.0610 College of education 0.1997 0.1440 0.1582 0.1444 Employment rate of the department 0.5255 0.1234 *** 0.4918 0.1237 *** Major (omitted: arts & physical) Humanities -0.7702 0.1008 *** -0.9537 0.1107 *** Social sciences -0.6862 0.0924 *** -0.8913 0.1055 *** Education 0.7623 0.1240 *** 0.5011 0.1396 *** Engineering -0.3519 0.0921 *** -0.5619 0.1057 *** Natural science -0.6542 0.1037 *** -0.8214 0.1117 *** Medical and pharmacy 1.0378 0.1396 *** 0.7399 0.1576 *** GPA (omitted: lowest) Lower 0.5805 0.3014 * 0.5671 0.3017 * Median 0.7203 0.2845 ** 0.7159 0.2848 ** Higher 1.0524 0.2850 *** 1.0431 0.2853 *** Highest 1.2923 0.2916 *** 1.2883 0.2919 *** Number of licences 0.0296 0.0154 * 0.0344 0.0154 ** Age 0.0021 0.0120 0.0024 0.0121 Female -0.1922 0.0750 ** -0.2026 0.0751 *** Married -0.0461 0.0806-0.0397 0.0807 Living with parents -0.0630 0.0718-0.0574 0.0719 Household head 0.1809 0.0714 ** 0.1814 0.0715 ** Number of household members 0.0127 0.0207 0.0140 0.0207 Mother's years of schooling 0.0020 0.0071-0.0003 0.0071 Family income at the time of college entrance (omitted: under 1 million won) 1 million - 2 million won 0.0358 0.1100 0.0357 0.1100 2 million - 3 million won -0.0013 0.1052-0.0014 0.1052 3 million - 4 million won 0.0114 0.1094 0.0060 0.1094 4 million - 5 million won 0.0293 0.1140 0.0240 0.1140 5 million - 10 million won 0.1017 0.1188 0.1010 0.1188 10 million won and over 0.0017 0.1635-0.0004 0.1635 Department average SAT percentile score 0.0078 0.0019 *** Number of observations 8,536 8,536 Log likelihood 1,013.6 1,030.1 Pseudo R 2 0.057 0.057

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 85. 16) Ⅳ. 고등교육이전단계의지역간교육격차 1. 지역별고교졸업자의대학진학지역선택행태..,. ( ). GOMS 4 <Table 11>.., z (= / )., (1),. (2) ( ).., 16) (7,936 ) <Table 10>, ( ) -0.1171(0.0513), 0.0474(0.0632) <Table 10>.

86 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ <Table 11> Lower-Class Students Tend to Enter Local Universities with the Same SAT Score Dependent variable: whether the university is in local region or in Seoul (logit model) Going to a local university (1) Not controling for SAT score (2) Controling for SAT score Going to a university in Seoul (3) Not controling for SAT score (4) Controling for SAT score Odds ratio z-value Odds ratio z-value Odds ratio z-value Odds ratio z-value Department average SAT score 0.995-4.3 1.143 41.0 Family income (omitted: under 3 million won) 3 million 4 million 0.974-0.5 0.976-0.5 1.056 1.0 1.010 0.2 4 million 5 million 0.858-2.7 0.860-2.6 1.260 3.7 1.249 3.0 5 million and over 0.845-2.8 0.845-2.8 1.452 5.8 1.512 5.3 Mother's year of schooling 0.977-3.7 0.979-3.3 1.080 10.5 1.034 3.9 Region of high school (omitted: Seoul) Busan 1.093 1.2 1.062 0.8 0.108-23.0 0.113-20.1 Daegu 0.205-17.5 0.201-17.7 0.117-19.2 0.099-18.8 Daejeon 0.825-1.9 0.813-2.1 0.159-14.4 0.140-14.0 Incheon 0.199-14.0 0.198-14.0 0.413-8.2 0.312-9.4 Gwangju 1.214 2.3 1.169 1.8 0.126-18.1 0.120-16.6 Ulsan 0.417-7.7 0.405-7.9 0.146-12.7 0.160-10.8 Gyeonggi 0.213-21.9 0.208-22.2 0.483-11.0 0.547-7.4 Gangwon 0.665-3.8 0.652-3.9 0.282-10.0 0.306-8.2 Chungbuk 0.857-1.4 0.829-1.7 0.169-12.5 0.189-10.5 Chungnam 0.251-12.4 0.244-12.6 0.267-10.8 0.256-9.6 Jeonbuk 1.005 0.1 0.943-0.6 0.208-13.7 0.278-9.2 Jeonnam 0.206-15.1 0.198-15.5 0.261-12.2 0.279-9.7 Gyeongbuk 0.302-12.8 0.297-13.0 0.247-13.4 0.234-12.1 Gyeongnam 0.632-6.0 0.618-6.3 0.155-18.8 0.147-17.1 Jeju 0.697-2.0 0.674-2.2 0.276-6.1 0.325-4.5 Pseudo R 2 0.081 0.082 0.156 0.374 Note: The year of university entrance, sex, and age are also controled in each estimation. Source: Calculated by the author using the 4-year university graduates sample of the GOMS data (n=12,837)..,,,

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 87., (3),. (4),. (z =41.0).,.. 17),. 2. 성장단계에따른수능점수의지역별격차,.,.. 17), Turley(2003).,.

88 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ,. <Table 12> GOMS,, 14,.,,,. 18) 14 13,022, 12,916.,,., 14,.,,. 5 (100 5 ), 14 7. 19),.,, 3, 4 5., 6. 11 13. GOMS 4 2001 10 300 20, 18), GOMS.,. 19).

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 89 <Table 12> SAT Percentile Score Gap by Region (1) (2) (3) Region of birth SAT score gap (t-value) Region of 14-year old SAT score gap (t-value) Region of high school SAT score gap (t-value) Foreign 5.09 (1.73) Foreign 7.24 (3.44) Foreign - - Seoul 0.00 (reference) Seoul 0.00 (reference) Seoul 0.00 (reference) Incheon -0.95 (-1.06) Incheon -1.11 (-1.37) Incheon -0.86 (-1.06) Daegu -2.12 (-3.20) Daejeon -2.98 (-3.77) Daejeon -2.91 (-3.79) Daejeon -2.40 (-2.65) Daegu -3.05 (-4.80) Daegu -3.09 (-4.87) Gangwon -2.86 (-3.66) Gyeongbuk -3.36 (-4.87) Gyeongbuk -3.15 (-4.49) Gyeongbuk -3.24 (-5.21) Gangwon -3.65 (-4.25) Gangwon -3.62 (-4.21) Gyeonggi -3.26 (-5.48) Gyeongnam -4.04 (-6.74) Gyeonggi -4.09 (-8.09) Ulsan -3.56 (-3.82) Gyeonggi -4.08 (-7.91) Gyeongnam -4.13 (-6.88) Busan -3.90 (-7.41) Ulsan -4.63 (-5.23) Ulsan -5.07 (-5.72) Chungnam -4.02 (-5.51) Chungnam -4.78 (-6.04) Chungnam -5.39 (-6.62) Gyeongnam -4.04 (-6.94) Busan -5.09 (-9.35) Busan -5.42 (-9.85) Chungbuk -4.95 (-5.84) Jeju -5.92 (-4.12) Chungbuk -6.37 (-7.53) Gwangju -6.29 (-8.34) Chungbuk -6.24 (-7.49) Jeju -6.48 (-4.50) Jeonnam -6.41 (-10.33) Gwangju -7.54 (-11.30) Gwangju -7.81 (-11.97) Jeju -6.62 (-4.67) Jeonnam -7.95 (-11.30) Jeonnam -7.86 (-10.67) Jeonbuk -11.29 (-16.54) Jeonbuk -13.06 (-18.08) Jeonbuk -12.92 (-17.87) Note: The respondent s sex, age, year of university entrance, and parents years of schooling are controled in each estimation. Source: Calculated by the author using the 2006 GOMS data and Jinhaksa SAT database.. <Table 12> <Table 2>,.,.,.

90 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ ( [2008] 51.8%),.,. <Table 2>, <Table 12> 4. Ⅴ. 결론 GOMS,. 16%..,,. 3 2..., 14,.., 20), 20) (2008) 3.

지방대학졸업자의노동시장성과와지역별교육격차 91..,,, 2., ( 3 2),. 21). 21).,,.,.

92 韓國開發硏究 / 2010. Ⅱ 참고문헌, :, 4,, 2005.,,,, 2007. 6.,,,, 2008-03,, 2008. 12.,, 2007-08,, 2007. 12.,, 2006., :,, 28 2,, 2005, pp.1 27., :,, 5 4,, 2005, pp.65 99.,,, 30 2,, 2007, pp.87 118.,, 1994 2003., : vs, 2,, 2003.,, 2001 2004.,, 1998 2006.,, 2007.,, 2003 2005. Mincer, Jacob, The Distribution of Labor Incomes: A Survey, Journal of Economic Literature 8(1), 1970, pp.1 26. Turley, Ruth, Wasted Talent: Why Some High-Achieving Students Don t Apply to College, Working Paper, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta Hilton Hotel, Atlanta, GA, Aug. 16, 2003.